What is Energy REALLY?!

[@ScienceAsylum]

This is a very old video. I revisited the topic more recently and feel like the new video answers the question more deeply: kzbin.info/www/bejne/qZ_NYqp4qdNpf5o

[@jdwalters9489]

Respectfully, I disagree. The new video takes an early digression into work and we get into the weeds of forcexdisplacement whereas this one focuses on the fundamentals of learning about what energy is by examining where we find it, and how forms of energy that 'look different' actually boil down to either kinetic or potential. My students found this one more useful.

[@BlueButtonMasher]

your video on the gradient seems to answer the question in a less abstract and more useful way imo.

[@lilianagarcia6225]

Good video XD

[@lilianagarcia6225]

@@jdwalters9489 I do not disagree

[@midnightdragonfly9707]

Adding location and movement brings to mind the phenomena of the ‘eternal ‘now’ principle. That the amount of energy is relative to the location and direction of matter. However, I would omit ‘gravitational energy’ as a thing when really that just refers to Earth’s solidified magnetism holding all matter in place.

[@triton9687]

Him explaining why we don't know what energy is, gave me a better understading of energy then any book I've ever read...

[@Cb22075]

Right!?!? same!!

[@JoakimfromAnka]

Finally an honest video on this subject.

[@Mazaroth]

Adrijana Radosevic Maybe he was talking about all the pseudoscientific stuff and the many, many, MANY snake oil salesmen out there.

[@unknownnepali772]

yeah!!!!!

[@redstoneworld6027]

ik

[@brigittelars5564]

Why can't these science guys ask the creator engineer of the universe, huh!!

[@mustafaalnsour1676]

@@brigittelars5564 Can anyone? I mean that would be great. Do you possibly have his phone number?

[@ScienceAsylum]

Almost all science sources explain what energy does. This is my attempt at explaining what it IS.

[@RohithMusic]

+The Science Asylum Noether's Theorem offers a beautiful insight into how energy arises as a concept due to time translation symmetry. Maybe you could talk about that?

[@ScienceAsylum]

Rohith B.V. That's not a bad idea :-)

[@SharkLe-bt8tg]

Hi nick!

[@TheTrickGuru]

The Science Asylum You say in your video that energy can't be broken into parts - however doesn't quantum theory state that it is? For example photons which are the quanta (discrete packets of energy) of the em field.

[@ScienceAsylum]

Brendan Stoneham People need to stop teaching that photons are discrete packets of energy. They're packets of light, not energy. Light /has/ energy just like everything else, but that energy can have any /value/ (E=hf). The light is broken into parts but energy is not.

[@5hanx]

I recently got really carried away with watching your videos, running out of new ones so gone back to the old ones you've done and it's interesting how you've changed over the years. Honestly some of the best videos I've ever seen, I really really appreciate every single hour you put into making these videos. Stay crazy!

[@lilianagarcia6225]

Yeah stay crazy! :)

[@jarzyna1231]

I'm really glad i found your channel, none of other ytbers can't share knowledge with such a simplicity, passion and humour. You sir deserve way more subscribers

[@hyronvalkinson1749]

Great work condensing all energy into two forms everyone understands (potential and kinetic) and then using relativity to show that they're one and the same. I know people who take college-level physics struggling to make sense of the concept of energy. I find it funny that it took me so long to figure out what you've explained in a 4 minute video. Hope this gets more views!

[@ScienceAsylum]

+Hyron Valkinson Glad it helped!

[@Zelink108]

xamarmm people keep saying "nothing" but energy can neither be created nor destroyed, energy is something that has always been.

[@lilianagarcia6225]

@@ScienceAsylum It really helped thank you so much! :)

[@phxbillcee]

You're a nut, but an informative nut! I don't always follow totally, but you give me something to grab on to & think about. (Only have 2 yrs of college, no physics & am mostly self-taught since {I'm 62 now}). I try to keep up with what we "know" currently, but that can be somewhat slippery, depending on how divisive the current schools of thought are in a subject. I really appreciate your channel, &, please, keep up the good work!

[@trash9152]

*N U T*

[@chasingtheunknown3763]

you're cool. :)

[@icelsikupingmerah]

phxbillcee damn 62 you’re such kind

[@mumhustler]

I like this guy's no bs approach. +1 sub

[@realdanielpeach]

"no bs" what was that intro lol

[@seastormsinger]

I just gotta say, aside from loving your videos for their content, I love love love the little grammatical corrections you throw in. They make me very happy.

[@kev4ev]

3:18 so would it be correct to claim that the kinetic energy has a property of relativeness similar to how the space and time are relative?

[@ScienceAsylum]

Yes. Since kinetic energy depends on speed and speed is relative, kinetic energy must also be relative.

[@srustibaral4179]

I've always been intrigued by this work. Energy. We know so much about it, yet we do not know what it truly is. Even though it will always be something incomprehensible, your video has given me a lot of clarity on the topic, and now I am less confused by the whole concept lol. Thank you.

[@srustibaral4179]

word*

[@alitheeternity4230]

I fid see in the halldiay and reisnick fundammetals of phyisics that energy is like a number we have assigned to things and work is like transferring energy.

[@jeffrobertson5864]

The answer to what is energy is really pretty simple. Energy is the capability of something to undergo a change. It’s not a fluid, it’s not a substance. It’s just a number and a very useful number. But like mass, momentum, and velocity, it’s a number that can only have value in relation to something else.

[@Pesquisando0b1011]

I started to write above and then I stop and read some lines here. I was think exactly the same yo said. Energy is the capability to change, so its not something but a property of the universe. Some kind of "status". Other cool phenomena is electromagnetic force. There's no perfect explanation how a particle can exert force in another distant one. The Electromagnetic theory gives us information useful enough to make use of electricity and magnetism but doesn't really tell us what things are. I'm thinking that maybe the universe and matter is a emergent property of some underlying thing! What do you think guys?

[@roberttrisca8210]

U juat said what it does, as all the others, not what is it. " it s the thing that does that." what exactly is that thing.

[@Pesquisando0b1011]

@@roberttrisca8210 Its not a thing. Its more like an effect or a property of the universe. IMHO

[@roberttrisca8210]

@@Pesquisando0b1011 i just called it a " thing" to outline the distintion between it and it s effect, as in the video he tried to talk about the " it " not it s effects, concluding that the mother-comment tried to explain the effect of " it " .

[@l0_0l45]

@@Pesquisando0b1011 Thats where relativity and quantum mechanics has its limits of giving us explanations. Thats why string theory is comming up and efforts to verify that it is true or not are being taken.

[@kochenk9521]

I've always felt the way we define what energy is to be so weird. I'm glad I'm not the only one who feel this way.

[@kristellfadul1906]

I truly love your videos!! Each one makes me a little bit crazier!! I use my energy to learn about quantum physics, watch football games, bake and sleep. I like variety. ;)

[@cjheaford]

Nick you explain science so well and make it fun. Please keep these videos coming! I like Hank Green on the sci-show channel a lot, but for example this video on energy was SO much better explained in roughly the same amount of time. Particularly the statement "Energy is just a number, and that number never changes." I've never heard the concept of energy put so well. You have a gift as an educator and I enjoy seeing your channel grow in subs. You truly know your craft and present it expertly. I'm a fan!

[@ScienceAsylum]

Thanks!

[@sudharsanvj8531]

I appreciate your honesty. Strictly speaking we don't seem to truly understand anything ! We just keep observing and have a list of observations !

[@ΣτέργιοςΚατσογιάννης]

I love how the video starts. The visualization of a person bumping around and acting "a little crazy" is a common misconception amongst kids about energy, thus associating the lack of energy as being tired. That's a great epistemological obstacle when teaching the more abstract concepts of potential and kinetic energy.

[@def_editz_4]

Ελλαδα

[@TGUlricksen]

THE most honest video in the world, love it.

[@kkknwjmsmdn9552]

I am rooting for you.... I hope you get a million subscribers! !!

[@maplesyrup2944]

Finally something that makes sense of the types

[@Cb22075]

Thank you!!!! Your video is the best of all the "what is energy" vids bc your the ONLY one who actually admits we dont really know what it even is or how to define it! Before watching your video I was thinking energy was some physical thing- I kinda had like a clear sphere in my imagination lol- now your making me realize I wanna say energy is actually the behavior of the thing, similar to a wave- a wave isnt the thing itself, a wave is the way the thing is behaving or moving... does that make any sense??.... correct me if Im talkin crazy...

[@srijansingh8124]

This person is just making me love science more and more❤️

[@karinlindgren717]

This video makes me so happy. 🥰 Thank you very much for making it!

[@ianbardrick5708]

This is excellent - has been a major help in helping a student come to terms with the concept.

[@asadaslam]

I have learned more from this channel than I have ever from my school Physics class.

[@promitchakraborty]

@The_Science_Asylum Wonderful video! In addition to explaining in a very simple manner one of the most fundamental and yet incomprehensible things,it also allayed my anxieties in life a bit; reminding me that most of the things that trouble me in my life are just arrangements of energy, and are not intrinsically fearsome or bad.

[@MrWildbill]

I think both the unknown and our inability to describe many things, like energy in terms of "what it actually is" makes physics so compelling to me. The "whys" are pretty cool also, why energy acts like it does, why after the big bang all of that energy did not just continue to radiate forever as photons, why did it take the form of matter in the first place. If it makes your head hurt thinking about it too long then you are probably on the right path :)

[@Muninn801]

This video is kind of fantastic. I would like an expanded version.

[@ScienceAsylum]

Thanks. I'll consider making a follow-up video.

[@huntingresonance]

***** As a Physics teacher I just wanted to say, after just discovering your videos they really are the perfect balance of meticulous attention to detail and a fast and interesting pace of delivery. I'll be pointing my students in your direction first thing tomorrow. Finding that balance with youtube videos is very difficult but you've nailed it. Thank you.

[@ScienceAsylum]

huntingresonance Thanks! This video is one of my personal favs.

[@trucid2]

Check out his video on Noether's Theorem.

[@jannickharambe8550]

this is more satisfying than other videos on energy but it still leaves me unsatisfied energy is just a number.. this does not seem right!!!

[@unknownnepali772]

but my question is it is necessary that displacement should be done to define work or energy...i mean if we are pushing a wall then wall is not moving but we are wasting some amount of our energy..is not that energy?how to define that...i am really confused???

[@ScienceAsylum]

( kzbin.info/www/bejne/qZ_NYqp4qdNpf5o ) The displacement of an object is necessary to do work _on that object._ If you push a wall and that wall doesn't move, then no work has been done _on that wall._ That doesn't mean work hasn't been done on anything. It just means it hasn't been done on the wall. It's certainly been done _inside you body,_ but that's because things have been displaced inside you body.

[@NotALizardPerson69]

"You gotta use your mind's eye" woah dude.

[@frederickj.7136]

So, Mary Jane is now legal in several states. Who would have guessed?

[@philjamieson5572]

Once again, I've really enjoyed learning from this channel. Thanks.

[@livvielov]

Really good video a little bit disappointed that we don't actually know, though

[@ScienceAsylum]

Yeah, it's kind of a bummer.

[@livvielov]

***** but there is an upside to not knowing everything. It means there's still stuff to discover and learn

[@ScienceAsylum]

Olivia C-G Yep! I'm pretty excited about knowing one day and I'm hopeful. Humans are pretty good at figuring things out ...when we try, anyway ;-)

[@cretaceoussteve3527]

Ever science I started learning science, I've been like, "this makes no science!" But science I love science, all the science point to learning more science!

[@Reign_Of_Is_REAL]

Olivia C-G AND ....you never will because there's no explanation. 👍😁

[@myway8772]

I like the cut of your jib, energy, I like to think energy is life force, the stuff that animates everything. I don't know if you explained what that is in this video but I'm sure no one really knows exactly what it is, except that we are all floating in it!

[@gabrielstracener7005]

The fact that you actually talk about the one thing that no one has ever actually talked about before is amazing. This same question has been boggling my mind for quite some time and I came to a some-what conclusion that energy is just like our math. It is simply a "variable" we use that helps us understand reality the same way that the variables 1 and 2 help us understand that an apple added to a group of 2 other apples make 3 apples. I kind of believe that energy is really just like the numbers we created since the beginning of mankind but I don't believe that other people see it this way and figure that energy must be a substance. The same way that numbers can work universally, energy is the same thing. I think of energy as just another number "1,2,energy,3...." even though that is not an accurate representation. Now this is not my definite thought or explanation of what energy is or its value because there is much more to it then that. Anyways, that how I think of energy and what I believe it to be in a way.

[@jaimehernadez9943]

great video man keep the work coming

[@sgtsnakeeyes11]

thanks, this was exactly what I was looking for.

[@ScienceAsylum]

sgtsnakeeyes11 You're welcome.

[@Lightning_Lance]

I'd love to see a behind the scenes of how you shoot these videos. I imagine it'd be hilarious, with you changing in and out of the lab coat and/or maybe filming things out of order so you don't have to change as much.

[@soilbroker]

In Greek the meaning of energy is that is the potential (of an object) to create work. Energy is not a think. So you should definetely explain in a video what work is and how it is related to energy.

[@rebeccalopez2997]

What a relief this is finely out in the open.

[@Meditate6969]

Really...This was quite a good explanation...Thumbs up

[@Bassotronics]

When I have thoughtful energy, I watch The Science Asylum. :)

[@johnconnell8436]

That's probably the best definition I've ever heard. 👍🏻

[@MikeSmith-cl4ix]

I think it's movement. And everything else emerges from it. Your videos are amazing, by the way.

[@frederickj.7136]

Now this is one user friendly and very, um, *lucid* exposition... tightly packed into a very small patch of spacetime. I'm glad The Science Asylum can be found within my light cone. Thanks!

[@ScienceAsylum]

FYI: I expounded on this topic more recently: kzbin.info/www/bejne/qZ_NYqp4qdNpf5o

[@tjzx3432]

I figured this out a few months ago, and came to the same conclusion. Wonderful.

[@stndsure7275]

It is good when we understand that description and explanation is not the same thing!

[@cavalrycome]

0:35 Only thermodynamically free energy can be used to do work. 2:42 When you use the word 'mass' here, I think what you really mean is 'matter'. Kinetic and potential energy both have mass. 3:19 The amount of kinetic energy something possesses and hence its mass is an observer-dependent quantity in special relativity.

[@ScienceAsylum]

cavalrycome Technically, yes... but when we start talking about mass being observer-dependent, we've stepped beyond the scope of this video. I've made videos since this one explaining what you're saying.

[@MrWildbill]

Wanted to add that your concept tree is really great even if it does not describe the first block, energy, I never visualized that next step, where it is either light or mass and then all streams from there was a great representation. It caused another piece to click into place. Nice Job!

[@ScienceAsylum]

+MrWildbill47 Thanks! I've spent a lot of time thinking about it.

[@trevorgreenough6141]

Finally, a video with a science guy with an answer of "I dunno", I like that

[@jamesbardsley5300]

Hi Nick I love this video and your channel as a whole. You are the best thinker about Physics on YT. One question: You say towards the end of this video: 'Every hypothesis we've ever had that has pretended energy is some kind of substance has epically failed'. Please give one or more examples of thinkers or scientists who have made that hypothesis. And, if possible, briefly say why the particular hypothesis failed. Best wishes James

[@lilianagarcia6225]

Awesome video! :)

[@Lon3Assassin]

Incredibly well thought out and clearly explained! This is really informative :)

[@WESTPRINGLE]

so what is energy then?

[@mohamedddos7301]

This is the best video I ever seen about Energy

[@ScienceAsylum]

Really? I made a newer video that _I_ think is better: kzbin.info/www/bejne/qZ_NYqp4qdNpf5o You might disagree though.

[@McBridger]

I use my energy on: Lazyness (btw I watched this for school)

[@v.gopalakrishnan350]

I love your channel!

[@lasithaaththanayake]

2:20 What holds the atoms together is Attractive frorces between atoms. There is no Energy in a bond. Forming a bond releases energy. So How chemical energy hold the atoms together in a molecule.?

[@ScienceAsylum]

I say as much in this follow-up video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/nWScn6qEopWLnNk

[@lasithaaththanayake]

@@ScienceAsylum Thank you ❤️ Appreciate your reply.

[@WideCuriosity]

I have pondered this myself and I'm glad this was a recommended video. I've never come up with a satisfying answer either, but nice try. Off to look at your later video now.

[@RamKumar-to5ip]

"Energy is just a number", u gave the best answer!!!!, its just a number that supports conservation theories, u r a crazy genius!!!!

[@Jessthenursecoach]

Your amazing, You are what every instructor shoild be. Please do a video about Quantum Physics and the Universe and its relationship with spirit and man Until next Time Lawrence

[@vanessajean2043]

I’ve seen a few videos on this yours is my favourite!! 🤣🤣 thanks for making this

[@31Sparrow]

a Joule measures energy with the units: kg*m^2/s^2, but what does that mean? Consider acceleration with units m/s^2: how fast the velocity (m/s) is changing. A newton describes acceleration of a mass with kg*m/s^2: how fast the velocity of a mass is changing in one dimension of space. By adding the additional meter unit to the newton, we get the Joule: how fast the velocity of a mass is changing in two dimensions of space. It seems to me that when matter is moving in two dimensions at once, it is being torn apart, so maybe energy is a measurement of 'how much a mass is exploding'.

[@ajithashok5255]

The definition I have learnt is "energy is the capacity to do work" (while studying in 9th standard) Is it right though ?

[@ScienceAsylum]

It is correct. It just isn't very satisfying. This newer video might have a little more satisfying of an answer: kzbin.info/www/bejne/qZ_NYqp4qdNpf5o

[@zodiacfml]

Stuff we already know. You are actually close to getting what is energy, abruptly stopped on vibration of elementary particles. What happens if we are able to stop or slow these vibrations? In the question, I mentioned "slow". It means, energy is a matter of time too. If time of an object is slowed down relative on an observer, the perceived energy output of an object is lessened too. If we are able to stop the vibration of these particles then it is also the equivalent of stopping their time. What is a particle without time? Nothing. It has no energy. It doesn't exist. Energy is simply existence and the perceived reality of time.

[@shadabhanif6111]

dude.....you're so good!!

[@darthrhodes]

8 years later, still the best explanation on KZbin.

[@johnarbuckle2619]

Excelente video, keep up the good work

[@surajtiwari2614]

What do you mean by two atoms colliding? How can they collide? Does electrons collide with other atoms' electrons when energy is applied or electrons collide with nucleus or nucleus gets agitated and collide with electrons or other atoms' nucleus?

[@ScienceAsylum]

Atoms get really close and then push off of each other via electric force. They don't actually "touch," but it's still considered a collision because a force is exchanged.

[@TheAlphaMaleProject]

we can't see energy but we can feel it's effect

[@boomstick9172]

+Manikanth Goud It has no effect. Forces have effects. Energy measures possible effects. It's a theoritical measure, like numbers.

[@ScienceAsylum]

+Ιωάννης Λέπουρας Just because it's an INDIRECT measurement, it doesn't mean it's not real.

[@boomstick9172]

***** What? That's like saying numbers have effects on physics.... PHYSICS have effect on physics. Numbers are used to describe them.

[@beaconterraoneonline]

Seeing and feeling are the same, a tool ... they are observations or a measurements that something is there.

[@Devilofdoom]

@@boomstick9172 I mean numbers do have an effect on physics. So... not really sure what you're on about.

[@faith1160]

My teacher told me to watch this and to be honest it’s rly good

[@gogomusic77]

please answer the following question...is it possible for a mechanically charged clock to weigh more than not charged. sorry for my bad english

[@fangugel3812]

Love the energy!

[@ricomajestic]

Total Energy is just a feature/property of the universe that never changes. The amount doesn't change that is but that feature can exist in different forms!

[@brinkman4925]

With degrees in electrical and nuclear engineering I spent hours contemplating relationship between force and energy. Determined that energy might not be real. This put my mind at ease knowing someone else agrees. Force to energy to work equations are easy on paper but hard to conceptualize.

[@ScienceAsylum]

While energy isn't a real physical thing, it is _useful_ so I tried to give it a better definition in a more recent video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/qZ_NYqp4qdNpf5o

[@dominiquefortin5345]

For me what always made sense for energy is to think of it as a disturbance in the fabric of reality (or in our universe). Like when you throw a rock in water, it will produce ripples at surface. I heard it being called a field and there are many different ones in our reality. Also, the stuffs of our universe are able to capture those disturbance and keep them for different amounts of time then release it when the conditions are right.

[@ScienceAsylum]

If you want to get super technical, even the "stuffs of our universe" can be looked at as ripples in quantum fields.

[@ajc5404]

Great video. Great way to explain and keep our attention. Thank you.

[@anwitabiswas4675]

Thank you very much.after watching your video, I have understood that why is people getting angry on me for asking this question several times.

[@petersteenkamp]

Definition: Energy = capacity for change. Change can for example be change in location (kinetic energy) or change of state (matter/liquid/gas) etc. Capacity means capability plus there is a quantity to it.

[@darthglowball]

The kinetic energy of a particle is an inverse proportionality constant whereby a randomly chosen unchanging force that is applied to the particle until it hits a zero velocity from its current velocity is inversely proportional to the resulting distance to get that particle to a halt. I don't know if this is more useful though.

[@balanaidu5370]

Feynman said it long ago that physicists don’t really know what energy is. It’s a bit like money. It makes things go around.

[@shubhamdiwakar540]

Great... Explained very well

[@abababa7483]

I like the way you explain stuff....keep it on..

[@jeffrobertson5864]

Spot on. Energy is just mathematical construct that doesn’t really exist outside the human mind. It’s just a number that is very useful in identifying and predicting patterns in the natural world around us.

[@Pesquisando0b1011]

I was thinking about this matter these days. Many things in science is just relations but we cant really define the "thing". I was looking for ideas to try to have an insight an thats the best video I found. Most ideas about energy Im having at this moment is more philosophic I think.

[@zacherydippenaar8524]

Perhaps one of the fundamental questions in our understanding of the universe.

[@TubeUil]

The information you gave was very interesting. It was good for my mind to eventually put all energy into the two categories. And also describing, albeit in short, how energy is not an actual thing, as far as tests have revealed so far. I'd like to know more about energy and light. The reason for me to search the web for 'what is energy', came from trying to understand what light is. Since it has no mass, but does have energy, what is it then? It moves through space from the sun to earth, from stars to alien planets, yet it is not something with mass, (potential energy), but does have properties like wave length. Your channel is most likely aimed at a young audience (me being young, but not so much: 35), hence maybe your choice for a sharp speaking tone, quick editing and kind of humor. Maybe it's just how you go about explaining things:). I stuck around though, because what you said was very interesting. Thanks! best, from Amsterdam

[@ScienceAsylum]

You're welcome. Thanks for sticking around :-)

[@АндрейДынин-л8т]

2)i am assuming - when exchange of energy between two points occurs, the path which energy followed is the path of least resistance. always everywhere-therefore I consider this a universal law. 1)energy exchange between two points max speed is C. Or C is max for energy flow.

[@NRGpyer]

nice work! i loved the tree

[@mrmeowtv6248]

It's okay to be a crazy? Oh boy I think I've gone overboard...

[@artbar6]

@ The Science Asylum Can you please explain where the word comes from and what questions were scientists trying to answer with it.

[@biledionez9014]

From the idea that energy can not be created or destroyed and only transferred: If i am applying work at an object causing it to accelerate forward, it gains kinetic energy while its potential energy stays the same, that means i am transferring energy to it, right? If so, what kind of energy was this inside my body before being transferred and becoming the kinetic energy on the object?

[@ScienceAsylum]

Correct. You're using chemical energy to move your muscles to do that work.

[@biledionez9014]

Thank you so much! Great video and channel, by the way.

[@karlaagekirkegaard7598]

A very good explation of something that cannot be explained. If energy is a property, it cannot be "just a number". A number is a number for something.

[@ScienceAsylum]

I give a more satisfying answer in a more recent video: kzbin.info/www/bejne/qZ_NYqp4qdNpf5o

[@satishm5260]

👌u r really honest. I am really impressed by this video.

[@PulseCodeMusic]

We have to consider some thing fundamental sooner or later and energy is about as fundamental as it gets. Energy is everything that is.

[@magicalworld5446]

What is the difference between force and energy? Can you make a video on it? I like all your videos. Keep up the good work.

[@ScienceAsylum]

I want to make a "what is a force?" video, but it's still in the brainstorming stage.

[@pinkunicorn1616]

You have a lot of energy Nick!!

[@sergiodavila3290]

This is incredible. Aristotle essentially says precisely what you’re describing in his treatment of potency/act - or more close to his Greek, ability/energy - which is the basis for his claim that reality is merely things energized and things capable of energizing. That corresponds to kinetic and potential energy, respectively.

[@Teelirious]

Energy is the difference between things? The trace of non-homogeneity left over after the shattered symmetry of the big bang? Energy is entropy that's been bottled? Love your channel.

[@rayali5735]

You deserve way more subscribers imo!

[@ScienceAsylum]

+Ray Ali Thanks!