What is Immanuel Kant actually saying in The Critique of Judgement? | Jan-Ove Tuv and Magnus Vanebo

Jan-Ove Tuv sits down with the artist Magnus Vanebo to discuss Immanuel Kant and his philosophical work "The Critique of Judgment".
▶ Full video: bit.ly/3a8CYkR
This is a preview of an episode from the 🔥 Dark Flame series. To get access to the full conversation and more exclusive material, become a $5 patron at / caveofapelles
The conversation was produced by Bork S. Nerdrum, with assistance from Sebastian Salvo.
The centerpiece was a 19th century reproduction of G. F. Watts' Hope. On the shelf were a Roman bust of a boy, a bust of Aristotle, and Pallas Athena.
SHOUTOUT to our TOP SPONSORS!
Dean Anthony
Fergus Ryan
Anders Berge Christensen
Sofia Xiang
Tonelise Rugaas
Yngve Hellan
Jared Fountain
Trym Jordahl
Shaun Roberts
Herman Borge
Jack Entz Warner
Michael Irish
Peter Asinger
Alastair Blain
Erik Lasky
Stacey Evangelista
Elizabeth Freeman
Jon Harald Aspheim
Would you like to get previews, bonus material and other benefits? Become a patron:
/ caveofapelles
Subscribe to our newsletter. It is the only way to make sure that you receive content from us on a regular basis:
bit.ly/2L8qCNn
Check out our other channels:
/ schoolofapelles
/ culturewarsnow
Podcast available on SoundCloud, iTunes, and Spotify:
/ caveofapelles
spoti.fi/2AVDkcT
apple.co/2QAcXD6
Visit our facebook page:
/ caveofapelles
Make sure to subscribe to our channel over at BitChute:
www.bitchute.com/channel/cave...
For inquiries - [e-mail]

[@edmundhusserl9071]

Regardless of what is said of Kant in this video--positive or negative--, the fact that the first 13 of the 25 minutes of it has been marked "intro" is itself/by-itself/in-and-for-itself etc. etc., incontrovertibly Kantian.

[@arunjetli7909]

Huge problem rooted in Aristotle and the demise of great western philosophy of Protagoras , Heraclitus and Plato. The concept of indifference is explained ontologically in The Bhagavta Gita , because The Gita defies Binary Aristotelian logic .so in the Monism-of Parmenides or Bhagvad Gita our world is a possibility of the ontological monism , not the other way around.The entirewestern critique of Plato brought out by the west , misses that the world of forms is the reality in which our mundane participates .by reversing this given world as the only possibility as actuality , dogmatism takes root . Whatever the European thinks becomes universal This the justification of terror of the westerner in eradicating non European cultures . Ontologically the seed of violence is rooted in this Kantian thinking it is consistent with his flawed co space,time A-priori but matter not A-priori The entire a Project of Kant is originally sincere to justify objectivity and yet retain the activity of the subject But very soon it reverts to th3 flaws of Aristotle , and cannot justify visceral empiricism. Kant has vet little respect for j inductive logic at fir due diligence as much is written about A-priori

[@arunjetli7909]

In a word Kant is epistemologically flawed because Aristotle’s as well He is however more dangerous , as he takes Aristotelian ethnocentrism to a different level Now in the Parmenidian Advaita view this ethnocentricism as dogmatism . In calculus as well one approaches infinity but dies not get there .the obsession for apodeictic certainty is the theological fetishized of both Aristotle and Kant