If the cause we are loyal to has to have objective value that doesn’t depend on your existence, then why should you be loyal to the well-being of your family as opposed to the well-being of any other two people?
@LogicPhilosophy4 жыл бұрын
Great question. The cause (C) needs to be believed to have value independent of your valuing it rather than actually have objective value. So, I could say that I value X b/c X has properties A, B, C. But I couldn't say I value X b/c I value it or b/c I take it to be valuable or b/c it pleases me (hedonism). Royce thinks that every cause must be PERSONAL otherwise you why would you be devoted to it but also must have an IMPERSONAL element to it. It has to be regarded as something larger than your private self. As to your specific example. You would be loyal to your family b/c it is something you personally are concerned with (you personally value or take interest in it), while two random people would not concern you (they might, but in this case we are supposing they don't). So, you would want your family to be happy if you died / no longer existed (as many people do) but maybe not two random individuals. I'm sure there is a more precise way of putting this!
@rcpphilosophy81224 жыл бұрын
Logic Are there any limits on what I can claim is a personal cause? For instance can I legitimately claim to be personally invested in the wellbeing of every sentient being? Or is that cause too much larger than I am to be personal?
@LogicPhilosophy4 жыл бұрын
Royce indicates (1) you can't be loyal to an abstraction and so I would imagine that the well-being of every sentient being is not concrete enough to be a personal cause (maybe for God) BUT (2) since you have an obligation to increase loyalty in the world, this commitment involves a humanitarian effort. The well-being of every sentient being is promoted (or served) indirectly through a commitment to loyalty.
@thegoldenlibrary3 жыл бұрын
Thank you! This video tells me not to give up and that I am loyal to my cause. It also tells me that one day other people my join in to make the dream real. Thanks.
@LogicPhilosophy2 жыл бұрын
Ya, that is Royce's position concerning the benefits to you of being loyal to your cause. In later parts of his book, he'll talk about whether your cause is moral or not. Best wishes!
@PhiloSign4 жыл бұрын
Great video! 6:50 The idea that we can't be loyal to particular material things, but rather end states, ideals or purposes, makes me think of final causes. So I guess the "cause" Royce is talking about would refer to some final cause.
@LogicPhilosophy4 жыл бұрын
Certainly! And for more on final causes, see your great video here: kzbin.info/www/bejne/g3acmop9mraapZY
@clairenash84483 жыл бұрын
This is a helpful video!! Thanks!
@LogicPhilosophy3 жыл бұрын
Glad it was helpful! Hoping to finish the rest of the book in the future!
@spoonsthepirate52393 жыл бұрын
Nice football jerseys man I'm a Sounders fan myself
@LogicPhilosophy3 жыл бұрын
Awesome. Don't really follow the MLS, but I do cheer for the Sounders whenever they play the Portland Timbers!
@dard19943 жыл бұрын
Thank u
@LogicPhilosophy3 жыл бұрын
No problem. The definition is definitely different than how people normally use the term "loyal"