What is Meta-ethics? (L1-Introduction)

  Рет қаралды 33,923

Mr Moffat Philosophy

Mr Moffat Philosophy

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 7
@nz1159
@nz1159 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you soo much, you explained simply and in soo much detail, it's really helpful how u broke things down and made it clearer to understand
@piyushverma2797
@piyushverma2797 11 ай бұрын
Amongst Few videos on internet where you don’t need to increase playspeed
@misganateshomegemesho6444
@misganateshomegemesho6444 2 жыл бұрын
THANK YOU VERY MUCH
@elinetube3975
@elinetube3975 5 ай бұрын
j'ai une question si vous pouvez traduire Pouvons nous dire que l'éthologie a mis fin au debat philosophique ? Puisqu'on sait que l'ethique est un résultat de l'evolution ?
@ReverendDr.Thomas
@ReverendDr.Thomas 2 жыл бұрын
meta-ethics: (also, metaethics), this is the over-arching principle which guides all moral judgments. According to the teaching of this book, there is but a single, succinct definition of morality, and that is whether or not any particular volitional act causes HARM to oneself or to another living creature. Any other paradigm of morality (at least those in the anti-realism camp), such as utilitarianism, ethical subjectivism, and other non-objectivist theories of morality, necessarily belong to the field of normative ethics. Read Chapter 12 for a complete disquisition of both meta-ethics and normative ethics. However, since that chapter may be too deep philosophically for the great majority of the population, the following is an excruciatingly-simple formula which one can memorize in order to know the distinction between the two categories of ethics: Metaethics = HARM. Normative ethics = UNDUE harm. So, “meta-ethics” refers to any kind of intentional harm, whilst “normative ethics” refers to the discernment of whether that harm is justified harm or if it is unjustified harm. Cf. “normative ethics”.
@AbAb-th5qe
@AbAb-th5qe Жыл бұрын
Nice video and intro to the topic. But some of your explanations are woolly and like much of education today is focussed on showing rigid taxonomies rather teaching students how to think for themselves. Then again this is only A-level standard, so teaching students about well known concepts in philosophy rather than how to do it is ok. Some your assertions in your slides are not supportable.
@shalizamohammed3690
@shalizamohammed3690 Жыл бұрын
i dont understand! maybe i'm high or something
What is Cognitivism in meta-ethics? (L2 - Cognitivism)
8:40
Mr Moffat Philosophy
Рет қаралды 16 М.
Metaethics: An Introduction
8:26
InspiringPhilosophy
Рет қаралды 84 М.
How Strong Is Tape?
00:24
Stokes Twins
Рет қаралды 96 МЛН
Une nouvelle voiture pour Noël 🥹
00:28
Nicocapone
Рет қаралды 9 МЛН
What is Morality?
14:09
Aperture
Рет қаралды 360 М.
An Introduction to Applied Ethics
11:59
The Wandering Professor
Рет қаралды 9 М.
Russell's Paradox - a simple explanation of a profound problem
28:28
Jeffrey Kaplan
Рет қаралды 8 МЛН
An Introduction to Metaethics
15:39
The Wandering Professor
Рет қаралды 4,2 М.
Metaethics
9:02
Philosophy Vibe
Рет қаралды 56 М.
An Explanation of Terminology used in Metaethics
22:27
Jeffrey Kaplan
Рет қаралды 60 М.
What is Ethics?
4:55
The Ethics Centre
Рет қаралды 980 М.
Metaethics: Crash Course Philosophy #32
9:34
CrashCourse
Рет қаралды 2,2 МЛН