If my math teacher explained pi this way I would have "gotten" it immediately. You're amazing.
@jamescollier32 жыл бұрын
just for that circle? or all circles?
@barbmccafferty45332 жыл бұрын
@@jamescollier3 What?
@zthehuman70512 жыл бұрын
@@jamescollier3 it’s a ratio, so yes for all circles.
@finnfrosty Жыл бұрын
@@jamescollier3 all circles because the diametre is always fit into the perimitre 3.14 times try it if u dont believe me
@TheAdam2877 Жыл бұрын
I was taught about Pi in school but this is by far the best demonstration to explain it plainly so that people can have a visual aid to better understand it. Thanks, I'm going to show my son this. ; )
@hasankader10502 жыл бұрын
When we were at primary school, teacher doesn't explained how does pi value comes 3.14. amazing thanks Luke
@user-lu1bv4lf8z2 жыл бұрын
44344
@chrisalex00118 күн бұрын
Simple, yet mind blown. Thank You!
@suvacity5963Ай бұрын
Wooooow perfectly explained 👍 thank you very much
@Kaido14122 жыл бұрын
When I finished watching this video, it was 3:14 am. Kinda freaks me out a bit, but also realized I should go to bed. lol
@JVerde8532 жыл бұрын
For me it was 19:47, which if you take the ln of, you get 2.97 which is basically 3, aka basically pi
@herbie_the_hillbillie_goat2 жыл бұрын
@@JVerde853 That's freaky. 😁
@pharrison7276Ай бұрын
Great explanation
@DrRSPMD20108 ай бұрын
You’re so Amazing !!! Thank you sooo much !!! Now I fully understand Pi and will never forget it !!!
@mountainman91452 ай бұрын
Because the string has an ending i.e. it is finite - should not the value of pi end eventually.
@umami02472 жыл бұрын
Nice work never got into math I just am terrible at it so never learned this. Often wondered why it was this number well now I know.
@anishsingh67032 жыл бұрын
Great Salute to The LEGEND and GENIUS of All Time :- ARYABHATA , Who had Given the First Accurate Value of Pie And Many Things in His Life and Can't be Compared to Anyone . Thankyou .
@sycration2 жыл бұрын
So much of Indian mathematics, especially the Kerala school, is greatly under appreciated in the western world. To venerate Kepler and Newton but not Aryabhata and Madhava is to deny history.
@anishsingh67032 жыл бұрын
@@sycration Please Sorry Brother but kya aap isko thoda sa Hinglish me likh ke Bhej sakte hai kyuki aapka comment mujhe acche se samajh nahi aa paa raha hai . Again sorry for that but please write it again in Hinglish .
@anishsingh67032 жыл бұрын
@@sycration Purane Time ke Mathematicians me ARYABHATA hi Pure WORLD me Jaane Jaate hai . _Specially UNESCO Ne ARYABHATA ke Yaad aur Sammaan ke liye Har Saal Celebrate karta hai Unki Inventions ki Pure WORLD me_ . He is the Father of Mathematics . Kyuki Aur Sab Mathematicians and Scientists ne to Unhi ke Kaam ko aage badhaya aur naye naye Inventions and Discoveries hue . UNESCO Said That - ARYABHATA Mind is Really Can't Comparable with any Other Mathematicians and Scientists . He is Legend and Genius of all Time in The World Who can Never be Forgotten . Said By UNESCO . _Go and Search if you Can't Believe_ . Thankyou .
@sycration2 жыл бұрын
@@anishsingh6703 sadly I do not speak Hindi so I use a machine translator. Hopefully this makes sense maiM mazIna anuvAdaka kA upayoga kara rahA hUM kyoMki mujhe hiMdI nahIM AtI hai| maiMne kahA ki nyUTana aura yUkliDa kI prazaMsA karanA galata hai lekina mAdhava aura AryabhaTTa kI prazaMsA karanA nahIM| prAcIna kAla ke pratibhAzAlI bhAratIya vaijJAnikoM kI upekSA karanA itihAsa ko nakAranA hai|
@idrisShiningTimes2 жыл бұрын
I'd not like to start any political discussion related to history here. But I do infact agree Indian mathematicians are underrated. Aryabhatta did find some decimal places of pi. But Newton on the other hand, used and manipulated the Binomial Theorem to find pi till any decimal places desired. I'm saying Newton's contribution and other mathematicians' contributions too do matter here and are equally on the level Aryabhatta was. मैं यहां इतिहास से संबंधित किसी भी राजनीतिक चर्चा को शुरू नहीं करना चाहूंगा। लेकिन मैं वास्तव में सहमत हूं कि भारतीय गणितज्ञों को कम आंका जाता है। आर्यभट्ट को पाई के कुछ दशमलव स्थान मिले। लेकिन दूसरी ओर, न्यूटन ने किसी भी दशमलव स्थानों तक वांछित होने तक पाई को खोजने के लिए द्विपद प्रमेय का उपयोग और हेरफेर किया। मैं कह रहा हूं कि न्यूटन का योगदान और अन्य गणितज्ञों का योगदान भी यहां मायने रखता है और समान रूप से आर्यभट्ट के स्तर पर हैं।
@stevekerp12 жыл бұрын
Did well with the "3" part but the remainder doesn't look like ".14" at all.
@paulg4442 жыл бұрын
yeah, he definitely pulled the string much tighter when he did the diameters than when he made the circumference. That was about .25 left over.
@creamu2roblox2 жыл бұрын
Close enough
@javidelgado52 жыл бұрын
@@jovmml its .14 of all three strings
@noonegotnojams10182 жыл бұрын
It's an approximation which is much close to 3.14
@robertveith63835 ай бұрын
@@creamu2roblox -- No, it's *not* "close enough!" The percent error is too big with the way he did it.
@tumak12 жыл бұрын
...INTERESTING PRESENTATION. But the string remainder should be one-tenthish of the unit lengths. That was not the case in the video. But the strategy was sound. Cheers
@asriel5222 жыл бұрын
Wait .......isn't π the integral of e to the -x² from negative infinity to positive infinity squared?
@noonegotnojams10182 жыл бұрын
It is
@shueb1232 жыл бұрын
He is just explaining from simplicity perspective or the basic of it ,,,you have gone too far to some other expressions of pi
@sedmirnel77642 жыл бұрын
We all know that pi is irrational. *Then why its definition is a ratio?*
@justmehere_2 жыл бұрын
because one of those values in the ratio is always itself irrational. Rational numbers are expressed as a ratio of two _integers_
@Tigerglider22 сағат бұрын
@@justmehere_yeah
@Xayuap2 жыл бұрын
when they say technically I don't know if they want to say theoretically o practically
@pi43132 жыл бұрын
This was my true calling
@lenny09122 жыл бұрын
🤣🤣🤣
@nagesh0072 жыл бұрын
Awesome 😍
@ThisReckless2 жыл бұрын
If you complete the circumference with all the string and there is no gap, Then why does it matter how many radiuses you fit around the circumference of a circle? If you enclose the circle then who cares what the ratio of radiuses to circumference is.
@zgp88502 жыл бұрын
Essentially, it's because this ratio allows you to compute the area or perimeter of any circle. If you know radius or diameter, you can know the perimeter of the circle.
@justmehere_2 жыл бұрын
it's also a special value that has many applications other than finding circumference or diameter, mainly related to curves and angles.
@venkatfaraday2 ай бұрын
355 videos 366 subscribers😢.... What a tragedy
@venkatbabu17223 жыл бұрын
Pi is a multiplicity of surfaces. That's why it seems to go on forever.
@peace77842 жыл бұрын
it doesn't seem to, it actualy does
@zaroonahmar55582 жыл бұрын
Help a lot,,, thanks
@davidulsalla60023 жыл бұрын
Yeah.good explanation
@yaaro_naan86262 жыл бұрын
Wow 👍 nice
@appalanaiduannepu98452 жыл бұрын
WITH PRACTICAL; STUDENTS CAN EASILY UNDERSTAND. THANK YOU
@robertveith63835 ай бұрын
Stop yelling your post in all caps.
@wilsonzhang87152 жыл бұрын
then why is half a circle one pi?
@paulg4442 жыл бұрын
@Channel Good Stuff because for angles by convention we normalize by radius R which is 1/2 the diameter. C/ R = 2pi
@jaredgoede26812 жыл бұрын
Thanks for an interesting question. This video shows that the circumference of a circle comes from the diameter going around the perimeter 3.14 times (or pi). They used an equation of pi = c/d: another way to say this is D x Pi = C or a full circle. Half a circle would only use have the diameter or one radius (2 radius make a diameter) Diameter=D Radius= R Circumference =C Pi= 3.14........ Full Circle. (D x Pi = C) or (R + R x P=Ci) or (2 x R x 3.14) Half a circle (D/2 x Pi) or (R x Pi) To learn more check out this video kzbin.info/www/bejne/mXSTl42VodB5prM
@Tigerglider22 сағат бұрын
@@paulg444thanks
@LaylaD51503 жыл бұрын
Dope 👍
@YuiAnine Жыл бұрын
hold the phone, this is 7th grade stuff? And is meant to be used BEFORE algebra?? ive learned algebra before Pi in 8th grade.
@Tigerglider22 сағат бұрын
Yeah im cramming for a test rn in prealgebra
@wagglebutt2 жыл бұрын
Looks more like 3.3
@audbay29904 жыл бұрын
Ya
@Ibrahimnada19952 жыл бұрын
I'm disappointed with my self , took me 26 years of living ,eating,shitting,sleeping to ask my self this question on 1:33 AM (what is PI why is it 3.14)
@albertobernado41032 жыл бұрын
math says "infinite", reality says "finite". Wt.... ???
@justmehere_2 жыл бұрын
pi does not equal infinity, it just has infinite digits
@EDM_BOY Жыл бұрын
It's cause we're living in a simulation 😅
@dracarysssx2 жыл бұрын
My teacher didn't tell me about this
@marshalls362 жыл бұрын
Ratio
@slyfly48292 жыл бұрын
The reason why we cannot solve pi is because a circle isn't 2 dimensional, it's actually 3.
@kallianpublico75172 жыл бұрын
There may be a deeper solution to pi that involves "dimension". There may be a simpler explanation. I don't know. One thing that puzzles me is the meaning of pi. Is it really just a number? I dont think so. In language meaning either explains or describes. Pi is a very strange number. I think it's strangeness is due to missing meaning. Another way to look at pi is as an operator. An operator that, when applied to any line, gives a special kind of curve. A number that turns one shape into another. Is there an operator that turns lines into triangles? Squares? Toruses? Hyperbolas? If we could find those operators maybe they'd shed more light on what pi is.
@jeffthevomitguy11782 жыл бұрын
@@kallianpublico7517. The secant if the inverse cosine can turn a point into a line. And the cosine of the inverse secant turns that pine back into a point.
@kallianpublico75172 жыл бұрын
@@jeffthevomitguy1178 How? How do you operate on points? By multiplication, exponents? What is the meaning or solution to any number operating on a point. As an example what is 3 times a circle or square? 3 circles, 3 squares? Cosines and secants have geometric meaning in 2 dimensions. Points are 1 dimensional. Points have no "shape". Even though we think of a line as a shape, what its made of (points) isn't a shape. One point doesn't make a line, but two points joined together do? How? How are they joined? Lines joined by angles give 🔺️, squares ⬛️, and polygons. How are points joined to make lines? By knots 🪢? Can we even have a visual reference? Atoms are joined together by the bonding of the outermost shells of electrons. Protons and neutrons are joined together by the strong nuclear force. Are points joined together by nuclear forces? Chemical geometry: shapes? What are points made of? The truth of the matter is either no one knows, or it can be made of anything. That ambiguity is not resolved by invocation of the trigonometric functions.
@jeffthevomitguy11782 жыл бұрын
I'm talking about plane projection. This is all with reference to a circle.
@kallianpublico75172 жыл бұрын
@@jeffthevomitguy1178 I'm sure it works and makes sense. Does it give you any more insight as to what a point is?