What is Robotic Process Automation (RPA)?

[@ac14081408]

This guy is a classic. We need more videos of him.

[@thomaspascual9780]

Get this guy in more videos! Love the way he presents info!

[@judecliffnfor4371]

Yep

[@nyambesimangolwa5755]

Facts

[@frankliu6123]

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) is a game changer in streamlining processes and increasing efficiency. It's amazing how technology is revolutionizing the way we work!

[@SkromnitsaKrasotka]

Thank you so much, first time watched IBM video, thoroughly enjoyed it and found so much useful! Please do more! You present so well and clearly!

[@Ruby-ij9yg]

Came here to find out what RPA is.This is just a sales advert for non technical people. I still do not know "What RPA is"

[@solutionanalysts1]

RPA revolutionizes operations by automating tasks, boosting efficiency, accuracy, and scalability. It frees up human resources for strategic initiatives, ensures compliance, reduces errors, and drives cost savings, productivity, and competitiveness.

[@Ramkumar-uj9fo]

Can it be said that surface automation RPA is Taylorist as above Yes, RPA (Robotic Process Automation) shares several characteristics with Taylorism, making it a modern-day manifestation of Taylorist principles in certain aspects. Here's a breakdown of the key parallels: Emphasis on Efficiency and Standardization: Taylorism: Focused on breaking down tasks into their smallest, most efficient components and standardizing work processes to eliminate waste and increase productivity. RPA: Automates repetitive, rule-based tasks, often those involving multiple applications, to streamline processes and reduce human error. It essentially breaks down work into discrete, standardized steps that can be executed by software robots. Focus on Task-Level Optimization: Taylorism: Concentrated on optimizing individual tasks rather than considering the broader work environment or employee satisfaction. RPA: Similarly, targets specific tasks for automation, often without fundamentally transforming underlying processes or addressing broader organizational issues. Potential for Deskilling and Worker Alienation: Taylorism: Criticized for reducing jobs to simple, repetitive actions, potentially leading to worker deskilling and alienation from their work. RPA: If implemented without careful consideration, can displace workers from tasks that become automated, potentially leading to job loss or reassignment to less fulfilling roles. However, it's important to note distinctions and potential for more holistic approaches: RPA's Potential for Augmentation: RPA can also be used to augment human capabilities, freeing up time for higher-value tasks and enabling employees to focus on creativity, problem-solving, and customer interaction. Emphasis on Human-Centered Automation: Modern approaches to automation increasingly emphasize designing RPA solutions in collaboration with employees, considering their expertise and ensuring a smooth transition to new roles. Integration with Other Technologies: RPA is often combined with other technologies like artificial intelligence and machine learning, potentially leading to more complex and adaptive automation that can better complement human skills and decision-making. Conclusion: While RPA shares similarities with Taylorism in its focus on efficiency and task-level optimization, it's essential to recognize its potential for augmenting human capabilities and fostering more holistic, human-centered approaches to automation. By carefully considering the impact on employees and designing RPA solutions in collaboration with them, organizations can leverage the benefits of automation while minimizing potential negative consequences and creating more meaningful work experiences. Bard No more Chaplin Modern Man 👍🌹♥️

[@frankliu6123]

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) is revolutionizing the way businesses operate! It streamlines processes, increases efficiency, and reduces errors. Embrace RPA and watch your productivity soar.

[@blitzbane4135]

Sounds Great - Great Explanation on RPA- automation is important and should be included with AI in most businesses in order to make processes easier...

[@NaveedHaque]

Incredible explainaation! Thanks Zach!

[@marthamariajaimecarrasco7201]

Amazing video and explanation! Could you please do a video comparing or explaining Robotic Process Automation vs Agentic Process Automation? Thanks!

[@robinhood5407]

Please choose the marker and it's color wisely. Clear ink with fat line helps.

[@adamgriffin851]

Nice job brother.

[@xinlinwang2580]

Zach, nice presentation. Like your video!

[@Becky_Cal]

Great, easy-to-follow explanation! Wonderful presenter.

[@sonalshukla3155]

very nice video this vey helpful .

[@najamul-alam4488]

How can I implement RPA in accounts payable section where there huge manual checking and physical hard copies are involved? And in my company we use SAP HANA.

[@piadonado4551]

Thank you! Very informative! :)

[@panashifzco3311]

Informative content...well-presented too....great..!!

[@jaywana1]

Can you give more information on jobs (rpa) and certifications

[@4EDoug]

I have a question. What happens to the Operation Team, what use are they after RPA is in place?

[@jatinnandwani6678]

Amazing!

[@大森亮太-e4m]

Hey! Jag är Japan.Japans IT ligger efter. Jag vill utveckla IT med RPA!

[@Butterflyy12]

How do you make this virtual board

[@IBMTechnology]

See ibm.biz/write-backwards

[@vamsivamsi4910]

I receive this link any other updated from ibm i mean any assement link or any other next process

[@HarveySidney-r7o]

Harris Jose Brown Melissa Harris Robert

[@DanielCorbin-z1l]

Davis Jose Robinson Betty Williams Nancy

[@HarveySidney-r7o]

Brown Daniel White Lisa Lee Elizabeth

[@AzherZarach-l9o]

Walker Mark Anderson Ruth Young Susan

[@zelalemmekonnen8030]

I thought it was real RPA. smh.

[@PeterUstinox]

de ja vu: kzbin.info/www/bejne/l4unkoGMnZifZs0

[@charles120001]

The first 60 seconds were boring computer jargon and gobblygook, so I stopped watching. Some office managers may understand your jargon, but the people making the buying decision, those at the top, will cut of the meeting or just walk out even if you are IBM.