WHAT is the Richat Structure / The Eye of the Sahara / Guelb er Richat and HOW was it formed?

[@MariaBaiasHeritage]

Thank you for watching! I hope you enjoyed learning about the Richat Structure. Let me know which geological wonder of our planet you'd like to learn about.

[@RocketGator05]

you and Bright Insight need to collab on this. He's got some good research

[@shauny2146]

Bright insight

[@jamesmcguire6706]

There's a lot more information out there. Do not even speak of it and just give the old main stream idea is not going to grow your channel. If you can scientifically dismiss their claims that's fine but do not even speak on it is very CNN of you.

[@cedarwaxwing3509]

I’d like to know more about Devil’s Tower in Wyoming, USA. The glib “it’s an old volcano “ don’t hold up. The rock there is actually a large phenocryst porphyry, which suggests deep intrusion and cooling, not near surface or extrusive cooling. Also, there are other outcrops of the same rock within twenty miles or so of DT, suggesting all of these structures were fed by a deep magma chamber. But given the exotic composition of the rocks and their odd, columnar cooling profile, there is something unique about the origin of the magma.

[@joshi6898]

Don't worry I'm going to make another video about my theory that is was actually built by termites. Its not Atlantis but a termite colony.

[@Sebastian_19876]

Thank you Maria, is amazing that after all the years i knew about this, is the first time I watch a video with the genuine explanation a no a clickbait about some myth.

[@MariaBaiasHeritage]

Thank you for watching! I'm happy to hear you are interested in the science-based explanation of the structure.

[@noban2730]

Thanks, was trying to find a video that wasn't all about Atlantis lol

[@MariaBaiasHeritage]

Thanks for watching! I'm happy to see that there are some people who are interested in the scientific explanation. 🙂

[@KuroItami]

me too! it was very interesting and informative, thank you

[@ConstantineJoseph]

It’s Atlantis bro

[@ClarkBark14]

Or provided by Joe Rogan...

[@docfortune]

Same.

[@kamlee4010]

Your video was very informative and interesting . Thank you for sharing this with us . I just watched Itchy Boots earlier in season 7 episode 22 riding right through this eye on her motorcycle . She is a geologist who has ride thousands of miles around different continents. She very good at history and explains the science behind the events , structures , minerals , gemstones and the beauty of this earth in her videos

[@waynemachan4732]

Yes, thats why I watched this ! Lol..

[@tezzrterry7485]

The Itchy Boots video shows that it is a non event at ground level. Not Atlantis.

[@MariaBaiasHeritage]

Thanks for watching! I'm happy to hear you found it interesting.

[@kamlee4010]

@@MariaBaiasHeritage I appreciate all good videos that are well researched and informative.. best wishes and thanks for your reply

[@franciscoramossanchez9577]

Excelente video, keep it up the good work !!! I am a new suscriber

[@MariaBaiasHeritage]

Thank you! And thanks for subscribing! 🙂

[@francisnjie1586]

Just watched itchy boots as well so you vlog was really helpful. Thanks

[@frankdillon6127]

motorcycle blogger itchy boots just went there a day ago, a must see video.

[@deptusmechanikus7362]

Finally! A video about Richat Structure that's not another clickbaity Atlantis hoax nonsense. Thank you

[@MariaBaiasHeritage]

I'm so happy to see that some people appreciate the science-based explanation of the Richat Structure!

[@Everythinggaming.]

is this a landform

[@najeemworldwide]

Amazing!!!

[@thomasmaughan4798]

Anyone else here after seeing Itchy Boot's drone video of the Richat Structure or Eye of Africa or Eye of Sahara?

[@amethystpagan8682]

i'm so sick of pseudo-science videos about the richat structure claiming it's atlantis or whatever. I'm really happy I found your video that actually explains in a simple way what the richat structure is and why it's so special

[@MariaBaiasHeritage]

I'm so happy to see that there are some people who are interested in the science-based explanation. 🙂

[@GregoryWhite-g8x]

There's another video by a guy who claims to have found the most amazing archeological site ever found but won't reveal it yet. Thx for this wonderful science-based video!!

[@usssanjacinto1]

That is Atlantis. Even the locals say so.

[@hereBDBD]

excellent - thank you!

[@MariaBaiasHeritage]

Thank you! I'm glad you enjoyed it!

[@jessicasinclair323]

Very well explained

[@MariaBaiasHeritage]

Thank you! 😊

[@SA-bc6jw]

I might never have heard of this had your video not been favored by the algorithms. Thank you for teaching us.

[@MariaBaiasHeritage]

I'm happy to hear the algorithms favored it and it reached a wider audience. Thank you for watching! 🙂

[@hattershouse710]

You should listen to the Joe Rogan podcast. They talk about things like this all the time. "Bright Insight" youtube channel has the most info on this.

[@Kmarad_]

I'm not fond of pseudo-science theory about this, but those tectonic plates building a nearly perfect circle doesn't seem too realistic in my opinion either. Every mountain was created because of tectonic plates right ? How come none are that circular ? By the way, if it was a dome, why is it below the ground around it ? I'd rather think of a volcano, but then that geological formation would be higher. So then maybe a meteorite ? Tectonic plates building a dome makes no sense at all to me. Please would someone care to explain in details how ?

[@awesome382]

Thank you , you rock!

[@geogarces]

Is the Ricaht have any matches patterns of Atlantae. I saw an old roman map with Atlanteans in the sahara, Mauratania.

[@brianvernon249]

This was re-discovered by NASA. They used it as a marker.

[@MahamRaza]

Very informative @maria mam I really likes your lectures

[@MariaBaiasHeritage]

Thank you! I'm happy to hear you like my videos! 🙂

[@MahamRaza]

@@MariaBaiasHeritage My pleasure ❤️

[@janhutten3]

Thanks Maria.🌍

[@MariaBaiasHeritage]

Thanks for watching! 🙂

[@Avensur]

Fascinating indeed 😮!!! It just gives you the desire to be in the middle of it. The Cradle of Civilization. But I will need a lot of fuel water, and food to reach it. An incredible adventure. Thanks my friend.

[@jacobmygindpedersen1138]

Cool!😊

[@MariaBaiasHeritage]

Thanks for watching! 🙂

[@لمرابطمحفوظ]

Thanks you

[@mikehunt7810]

Any reading you'd recommend on the subject?

[@TrollBot.]

Muy bien! According to underrated science and according to ancient astronaut theoriest, the Ritchat structure is also the capital of what Plato called Atlantis!

[@agriffin5308]

I agree.

[@ajitparkar9059]

I dont think its natural

[@jom4752]

Agreed. There is proven evidence that it was the site of Atlantis washed away by a possible tidal wave moving from the Mediterranean across to the Atlantic Ocean some 10k years ago

[@jinoshiosote4049]

That's what I understood it to be

[@jinoshiosote4049]

@@jom4752 Yes. That's probably where the whole mythos of Atlantis being underwater comes from. The fact that it was literally under water because of the tsunami.

[@MrWheezyE420]

As others have said it's crazy how you have to trawl through pages of conspiracy nonsense just to find an actual video about the geology and actual science. Thanks for the informative video!

[@Prifly70]

I'm so glad you didn't bring up Atlantis, thank you for factual information on the structure. Its amazing how many channels just have clickbait garbage about the eye.

[@MariaBaiasHeritage]

Thanks for watching! I'm happy to see that some of my viewers are interested in factual information and not speculation.

[@michaelzane3823]

It is the location of Atlantis though, the proof is undeniable

[@barbarosa3d239]

@@michaelzane3823 The mountains up north even inherited Atlas name.. the great flood and tsunami is still more reasonable theory for me, than 100 million years of process. I still did not find the answer why it is formed in concentric circles...

[@lovewalruss]

Thanks

[@Bimmer_MD]

So just curious, I have a question, & I apologize in advance this kind of long winded. According to you, the Richat is the eroded remnants of a dome of igneous rock (kimberlite, rhyolite, carbonatite, black basalt) and sandstone. 1st sandstone is a sedimentary so it would not have anything to do with the original geological formation, but it would have settled into any voids in the igneous formation as time passed. Next, in the video that you referenced, it explains that diamonds are typically produced among kimberlite formation. Given that the the mineral surrounding the diamonds would be going through a very similar geological process I would believe that the surrounding elements would develop somewhat similar characteristics. Resulting in a tough durable mineral that would at least be comparable to diamond. Last, 3 out of the 4 minerals that you say that are found are kimberlite, basalt, and rhyolite. All of which are extremely similar to granite. Granite very resistant to wind and rain erosion. Look at Half-dome in California. It is an igneous formation that's estimated to be around 83 million years old and shows very little signs of erosion in comparison to that of the Richat. Another geological example that brings doubt to your hypothesis is Uluru in Australia. Uluru is estimated to be 1/2 a billion years old. The big difference is that Uluru is sandstone which is highly susceptible to rain & wind erosion. Yet, it is also nowhere near the state of erosion of the Richat. So my question is, if the Richat is compromised of these very durable minerals, how is it that the have degraded so far beyond any other comparable geological formations?

[@MariaBaiasHeritage]

Hi Kevin, here's an article from "Geology Science" that goes deeper into the details about the rocks and the formation of the dome: geologyscience.com/gallery/eye-of-the-sahara-or-richat-structure/. I hope this helps answer your questions.

[@stig]

@@MariaBaiasHeritage I bet none of the writers of that have actually gone there.

[@ChrisBrown-hr6mc]

It’s because of flooding and water erosion that the richat is weathered that way

[@jamielandis4606]

Super interesting! I never heard of this before.

[@MariaBaiasHeritage]

Thanks for watching! I also find the Eye of the Sahara very interesting. And there are so many more fascinating natural formations on Earth to explore!

[@RocketGator05]

check out Bright Insight's research on this. He makes the argument that it might be Atlantis. Pretty thought provoking

[@Chronically_ChiII]

3:30 what did you say? The "little sphere"? Why didn't it weaken?

[@KrixoniusPlays]

Maria you mentioned pangea, i have a question, do you think as the plates are now would rasing or lowering the water change the shape of the continents at all? With a maximum depth of only about 46 feet (14 m), the Azov is the world's shallowest sea. There are many examples around the world. What do you think?

[@ClarkBark14]

The salt shelfs in the gulf of Mexico would be a great vid.

[@MariaBaiasHeritage]

Thank you for the suggestion! This sounds like an interesting topic. I'll search for the scientific explanation and add it to the list of future videos.

[@ClarkBark14]

@@MariaBaiasHeritage "shelfs" was probably the wrong wording. I don't remember the proper name, but enormous volumes of salt were deposited as Pangea split and sea water filled. Very interesting geography along the Sigsbee Escarpment.

[@damedesmontagnes]

I theorize that the concentric ring formation is due to the vibratory alignment of matter as in cymatics and spherical standing waves.

[@driverguy7]

Please examine, study, and investigate the Yonaguni Structures that are underwater south of Japan in the Pacific ocean, that appear manmade, but may not be. Thank you!

[@Funckle73]

Love her!

[@NickVenture1]

Well explained. Now I must check when the large meteorite hit the earth which destroyed the Dinosaurs on earth. Because that impact area is now located in central America. Was the impact area origininaly located on the single land mass of the one continent and since shifting to the place where we see it now?

[@MariaBaiasHeritage]

Thank you! That’s a very good question. The dinosaurs were wiped out sixty-six million years ago. By that time, Pangaea had already started breaking apart, and the continents were closer to their current positions, rather than the original landmass. Here’s an animation of how Pangaea broke over time (kzbin.info/www/bejne/nXyvmX9jj7CGrJo) and you can see where the contents were at the time of the meteorite impact. But, the continents were still drifting at the disappearance of the dinosaurs, so there was still an increased activity of tectonic plates and lots of volcanic activity, all of these factors influencing the climate. So the dinosaurs lived (and died) during pretty harsh times of the planet. Here’s an article that provides more details about this topic: www.nhm.ac.uk/discover/how-an-asteroid-caused-extinction-of-dinosaurs.html

[@NickVenture1]

@@MariaBaiasHeritage Thank you for the explanation. 65 Million years ago.. that's quite recently, indeed.

[@juarawebcom298]

How to proof its happened 100millions years ago? Is there any other Richat Structure existed?

[@derekscanlan4641]

There is something a bit similar in the Philipines, near Manila. It's an island in a lake, on an island, within another lake, on a bigger island!

[@Heather.Isaiah43.1]

Thanks! Wanted to learn more after my Haunted Cosmos podcast mentioned it 💛 I hope one day you come to a knowledge and understanding of Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior. Blessings to you

[@aboukalil]

Is this an ancien Hydron colider that was accidently exploded abd distroyed atlantis ?

[@carsonroeser9079]

Nah bro it’s Atlantis! Source: Joe Rogan.

[@stig]

I was just there for my 2nd time. If you don't believe me then check my work. I was there a few days ago. BTW. It's not dome geology.

[@derekscanlan4641]

@@baysideauto maybe she just obeys the scientific principle of "extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof"? Unless someone provides some extraordinary proof that this is not natural (...and the have not, so far), I see no reason to believe 'Atlantis' theories, or other wild speculations about it

[@stig]

​@@derekscanlan4641 @baysideauto ?? If you read plato he says that the circular ditch was naturally made and then altered by man. It has nothing to do with anything extraordinary. Also the saying extraordinary claims, it's actually not true. Proper evidence is what matters most, regardless of how extraordinary the claim may seem.

[@Zorton_]

There's another eye of the Sahara. In Chad! 19°0542°N 19°14'46"E It's has rings just like the other eye of the Sahara. Please check it out and talk about it. I see it as very relevant. Thank you 🙏🏼 Love the channel ❤

[@kennethutz4205]

I appreciate you validating the structure as Natural. It would seem way easier to create Atlantis if Mother Nature had it laid out already.

[@alecstevens8467]

its not atlantis

[@CC22ball]

We need to dig under there!!

[@jonilehtonen69]

Hey! I would be really interested in learning about fake art spotting techniques. I'm guessing there's the basic radiocarbon dating, identifying materials used back in the time. I would truly enjoy an overly detailed video about the subject!

[@MariaBaiasHeritage]

Hi Joni, thanks for the suggestion on a video about fake art spotting techniques. I already have a video on this topic, discussing the various scientific methods we can use in detecting art forgeries. In case you haven’t seen it, here’s the link: kzbin.info/www/bejne/e5uraHt5faiXr5o . I don’t think I’ll be coming back to the topic in the near future, but if you’re more interested in using radiocarbon dating for detecting art forgeries, here’s an interesting article where they used radiocarbon dating on an alleged painting by Fernand Léger, and they proved it was a fake (link.springer.com/article/10.1140/epjp/i2014-14006-6). In case you don’t have access to that article, here’s an open access article that talks about identifying art forgeries by radiocarbon dating: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6613090/

[@m.barcalow4813]

Never in 100,000,000 years would I ever belive your synopsis for a 25 mile wide perfect concentric circle to form naturally. This is a man made event.

[@ilovemyplug8454]

subscribed :)

[@MariaBaiasHeritage]

Thanks for subscribing! 🙂

[@hihihello263]

Do you know if there is another example similar to what happened to Richard structure anywhere in our solar system? Thanks in advance 🙏🏻

[@MariaBaiasHeritage]

I haven't seen anything related to this while researching the Richat Structure, but I wasn't looking specifically for other structures in the solar system.

[@thomasmaughan4798]

A similar feature, much smaller, exists in Utah in the United States; it is called Upheaval Dome and is believed to be a salt dome or intrusion rather than magma intrusion.

[@derekscanlan4641]

there's a similar thing in the Philipines, near Manila... but it's full of water. It looks like an island in a lake, in an island, in a lake, etc.

[@thebunz7]

Not a natural formation as not recreated anywhere on Earth or elsewhere. Something sentient created this which excites the imagination.

[@timcarpenter7399]

Atlantis

[@macdmacd7896]

superhero landing.

[@rachelcox5290]

I'd like to know about what created the Big Horn Basin in Wyoming.

[@MariaBaiasHeritage]

Thank you for your suggestion! I've added this topic to my list of future videos.

[@rachelcox5290]

@Maria Baias Awesome. Can you tell me what caused the crater directly West of the Richat at 21°00'57"N 11°49'55"W?

[@MariaBaiasHeritage]

Sorry, I couldn't find any scientific information specifically on this smaller crater.

[@rachelcox5290]

Thank you!

[@develentsai3215]

Atlantisian just left the room:)

[@douglasboone3790]

I can not figure-out, how to operate this Gravity Manipulation Device, because the instructions are all written in Hieroglyphics`.

[@rickyspanish69420.]

It's nice to find a video not about Atlantis lol

[@MariaBaiasHeritage]

It's nice to have viewers who are interested in the scientific details behind the Richat Structure.

[@floydcrase625]

The structure seems far from the continental plates edge for that theory has the volcanic rocks been dated? The oldest rocks are on top? In the middle? From what I have seen (second hand) is its more like it was forced down and the magma forced it back up hence the almost vertical sedimentary layers forming the rings

[@niccapetown]

Can you do one on Table Mountain? How it came to be etc.

[@MariaBaiasHeritage]

Thank you for suggesting this topic. I've added it to my list of future videos.

[@CinamonChina]

I still don't understand how this "CIRCULAR" igneous regions were formed.

[@god47398]

it just seems way too specific to be natural. i'd be curious to see if theres anything else like it anywhere on our planet as the natural process described seems to be incredibly rare, especially on the scale of the richat structure.

[@MECKATRON]

You talk with such conviction as if you were there when it happened. The genies have a different story but your story is satisfactory enough for those that came to see it

[@jdubs681]

Thank you for being logical and not trying to make a dumb story about Atlantis

[@andrewbresee2969]

Great video, thank you! There are so many videos out there, convinced that the structure was Atlantis. But I’m a skeptic, and your video helped propose a different, and much more likely, explanation. Keep it up!

[@StargazerTheFurry]

It's not "much more likely" this is literally the fact and truth on how it was formed lol, there are many scientific papers out there stating so.

[@andrewbresee2969]

@@StargazerTheFurry Ehh, no. All historical theories are conjecture. Some are just more likely than others. "In science, theories never become facts. Rather, theories explain facts. [A big] misconception is that scientific research provides proof of attaining the absolute truth. Scientific knowledge is always tentative and subject to revision should new evidence come to light."

[@jamesdaviesanswers8751]

@@StargazerTheFurry no it’s not.

[@stig]

05:08 What is this thing you keep showing here? It isn't the Richat Structure.

[@derekscanlan4641]

yes, it is. The image is just not aligned north. It seems to be aligned Southwest. That took me 1 minute on google maps... did you not try it?

[@stig]

@@derekscanlan4641 Did you not check who I am? I've spent 15 years on google earth. That's One Million Percent not the Richat. Where is the Sebket el Guelb? Hint: I've been there 3 times. I'm the Richat Expert.

[@stig]

@@derekscanlan4641 I don't know what happened to my original response to you but I've been there and I know the structure. Where is the Sebket el Guelb? I've been there three times.

[@octavio318]

HI can you explain how the mount Roraima was formed ? thank you for the excellent video

[@MariaBaiasHeritage]

Thank you for watching! I'm happy to hear you enjoyed the video. And thank you for the video suggestion!

[@blackheart4360]

Its Alantis.

[@bearlogg7974]

You can tell something stood there at one point and that whatever it was got swept away by flood & wind erosion thousands of years ago

[@pubuapubua]

Hey! Factuality!!!

[@bambootheleafwingwhototall3757]

Thoth the Atlantean of the Emerald Tablets said two of the three islands sank and one moved, I believe it was to Afrika.

[@soundcoreclassics4367]

I don't believe this, how can u explain the structure found in the area.

[@madalinmaximilian6899]

Its not a natural formation .. Pls do more research

[@elitestockpicks8212]

I am wondering if we can go there.

[@shawnmccarthy4022]

Is that why some people believe in flat eart and round earth because we used to be one land mass

[@trout3685]

Three years ago, World of Antiquity posted a video debunking claims that this structure is Atlantis. Also, bright insight just posted a new video on the richat structure so more trolls are likely to come. I hope they see this comment.

[@priztucker]

I think we all agree that the concentric circles do not seem so natural. Can you verify that this occurs naturally throughout the Sahara?

[@perfectjsjsj]

Have you seen the inside of a tree before

[@barleyarrish]

If we quote a 'Theory' we are not quoting 'established fact'. You did not mention 'Electrical Discharge' and 'Plasma' as a causal factor, or establish why you chose the date for the formation. If you study the Satellite Photographs you can clearly see that there is a large East to West pattern which follows the low lying land from Mediterranean to the Atlantic. This would appear to be hard evidence of a catastrophe that reduced the historically fabled green paradise of the Sahara to the Desert we see today, Which of course would suggest a much more recent date, possibly only 5-7000 years ago.

[@deandee8082]

lol at dome, it's a mothership footprint... yup of just one of the 3 landing legs ...

[@shauny2146]

I really like this idea and it’s so cool .. just asking because there is obviously an alternative explanation.. is jimmy corsetti and Randal Carlson wrong because he is not a geologist? Or does he have some valid points to consider an alternative?

[@scottoman]

i see an ancient civilization

[@joeykimble62]

I want to see a video about the "rainbow mountians" in china. It'll make for a great thumbnail

[@MariaBaiasHeritage]

Thanks so much for the suggestion! This is definitely going on my list of future videos for when I get back to creating KZbin videos after taking a break.

[@PeeedaPan]

You need to read about Atlantis. This is the proven location of an ancient advanced civilization circa 11,000 BCE that was flooded after rapid melting of the polar ice caps caused massive sea level rise and was due to a giant asteroid that hit Greenland. Fascinating stuff

[@brandonHines76]

this is one of the examples that I believe the scientific speculation is completely wrong... we live in a day where we are finding out human civilization (presumably) have been around far longer that we assumed, science community is so close minded they develop these.. unlikely contrivances to explain things they can't... its a giant assumption. Stamped with believe us, because you have to, don't think about it, we will for you.

[@gpasprimus6505]

In time immemorial titans existed now you have there remains it is the eye of the dragons that swam the ancient oceans many forms you call mountains are titans uluru in Australia is a heart of one of them observe its vein structures

[@whysthat6675]

I believe it's atlantis.

[@sonyalindee8676]

I am fascinated by Pangea. I do not agree by the visual how all land mass was on one side of the earth. What if during the formation of earth it was originally a water planet then as the moon was formed in the giant impact theory the amazing amount of heat generated on the surface of the planet caused expansion. We all know that heat expands and cold contracts. Then what was once below the surface of the waters expanded to become The continents. I think this would better explain the eye of the Sahara. ☄️🌖🌍

[@jason_m_schmidt622]

So skinny earth became “thicc” earth 😂

[@timothyappleseed2986]

There is no way all the land could be on one side and the water on the other. If that was the case the water would simply cover all the land.

[@sonyalindee8676]

@@timothyappleseed2986 maybe this translated wrong for you. I said I did not agree with the land mass only on one side of the earth. But that the earth itself was entirely covered in water and the single land mass was below the surface. With the occurrence of the giant impact theory When the moon formed during a collision between the Earth and another small planet about the size of mars. You and I know that heat expands and cold contracts. As the heat from this collision occurred the Structure of the Earth expanded out from the waters. Of course this is just a theory as everything is only an idea not a proven fact.

[@timothyappleseed2986]

@Sonya Lindee thanks for the reply. Of course we are all working out theories based on how we understand the laws of nature. I don't see the moon separating from the earth either though. The texture of the earth is 1/1000 of the diameter of the earth including the sea floors. That's like laying a human hair on a cue ball. The moon is much smoother. If the moon had separated from the earth due to some impact, neither would be as smooth or even as round as they are.

[@timothyappleseed2986]

The shorelines were actually formed with giant bulldozers. If you want to know more about that hit me up on Facebook. Maybe a can do a video about it together.

[@MidnightDesperado66]

Didn't Plato describe this as the city of Atlantis? Three circles of land and two of water, with a opening to the sea of the south and with mountains to the north called Atlas?

[@ad3ly]

Natural formation.. yea, sure..

[@deandee8082]

all rock valleys mountains we see on this planet was once molten lava.. good grief

[@greatreset85]

God created heaven and earth 🌎

[@uncletom1971]

So it's like a ... giant pimple?

[@biseboy9062]

Thats Atlantis.

[@n2datasolutions443]

The richard structure is atlantis, I saw a documentary on this so it must be true

[@stevelacombe5291]

It looks like an open pit mine.

[@mcdemuth]

I think the structure was once the ringed city of the Atlantean (Atlantis) Empire that Plato described... Not saying I disagree with your theory of it's early formation... but, that the Atlanteans thought that it would make a great place for a city... Perhaps with some modifications by "rounding off" some of it's features. however, the amount of modifications that was needed to create the ringed water ways could easily be debated... There also seems to be evidence of a massive tidal wave from the sea that destroyed the region around 11,000 years ago, that reshaped the land, just like large amounts of flowing water always does. That would explain why there is so much salt covering that entire region.

[@jason_m_schmidt622]

That wasn’t Atlantis. Atlantis was not destroyed. Atlantis left🛸

[@soundcoreclassics4367]

Yes, it was the advance civilization of atlantis, The geologist found a structures there.

[@_ingoknito]

3:34

[@HeatherRose_]

It's a petrified tree stump.

[@sufferingduckman]

Oh. My. Goodness. Um... wow. No.

[@koralite3953]

"natural formation" i am skeptical

[@Eye_Exist]

This is a good example of mainstream misinformation. This idea of formation of the structure is not even on its hypothesis stage, as site has barely been visited by scientists ever, it surely has never been tested and there is no other example of such formation of similar structure anywhere on earth. the only real scientific and honest answer is that we do not know how it was formed or if it was created. but of course we have to demystify such unnatural looking structure which has suddenly started getting lots of attention from the alternative history point of view suggesting it is the location of atlantis - no matter if we actually have any hard scientific research behind it or not. anything is legal as long as it supports the mainstream misinformation narrative of science knows there's no mysteries on earth. please stop calling this video "learning" - just because you wear glasses and suit and speak like you know something doesn't mean you know anything.

[@MariaBaiasHeritage]

As a scientist, I prefer to use science to explain why things are the way they are, because science provides sufficient information to help us understand the world. It’s why I love science - we can learn so much about our world using science. Regarding Atlantis, there are various suppositions as to where it might have been, but there’s no scientific evidence to support any connection between Atlantis and the Eye of the Sahara.

[@Eye_Exist]

@@MariaBaiasHeritage And your scientific evidence for your claims lies where? i'm not suggesting it is A. - i'm saying you are spreading misinformation because you urge to prove it isn't. you don't have scientific evidence - what you have is a hypotethical way of how it could have formed naturally. if you are a scientist you understand the difference.

[@Eye_Exist]

@@MariaBaiasHeritage also which I notice is that you are a scientist in a completely different field, which isn't even close to geology. funny how you use the general title as an authority regardless.

[@Eye_Exist]

@@MariaBaiasHeritage you mention science astonishing six times in three little sentences and even blame someone else for having no scientific reason behind and yet you fail to provide any kind of scientific research for your claims even when asked? oh god youtube 🤣

[@clarencetse]

Must be nice being an armchair warrior without contributing anything to society

[@lllllsp1d3rlllll]

Bs rocks don't form that way this video goes against what we know about geology and weathering

[@stepper8584]

"A super mega long long long time ago, we guess probably something like this happened" is not truely scientific, so I think it's a bit misplaced to use language as if it's fact. Also, or better yet, especially scientists should be very careful what language they use, because often science teachers speak as if things that are highly speculative are science fact. That being sad, thanks for making this video and giving a nice video explaining this hypothesis.