the intro "bang" took my soul out of my body and brought it back again.
@lgon99773 жыл бұрын
Like the video guys! She's at gunpoint...
@PatrikAe-e1k10 ай бұрын
Thanks! I am working on a essay about XRF and this video helped me so much!
@theomoundzounga3855 Жыл бұрын
Wouah well explained 👌, best video on XRF so far! I am covered. Thank you very much!
@multivitamin4254 жыл бұрын
2:01 could've animated secondary radiation as moving outward and not inward, it may confuse people
@imranhaider82482 жыл бұрын
Make a video on wdxrf as well. Explaining the function of analyzing crystal and collimator. Thanx
@flambojan_lab11 ай бұрын
Good explanation
@dharshdesign4 жыл бұрын
how does this XRF works if I place a silver ball, that's wrapped with a 22K gold sheet? Will that detect the silver content thru that gold, or will detect only the purity of gold?
@dragondrago17404 жыл бұрын
Am not an expert on the subject, but I assume that it will only measure the gold. XRF is used to measure atomes on the surface of materials and not in materials
@dookierotterdamski89493 жыл бұрын
@@dragondrago1740 it wil not penetrate enough to detect the silver ball it wil only go a few micro's in the base material
@susie20152 жыл бұрын
XRF only detect the appearance 30um coat.
@krishnakantakonar6833 жыл бұрын
Greatly explained 🙏🙏
@divijmallela84442 жыл бұрын
short and crisp
@muratgultekin53511 ай бұрын
Wiil this xray show the difference between mild steel and chromoly And the thickness
@DrAdeel9694 жыл бұрын
How to analyze the data after mapping from beamline?
@blacckgoete10202 жыл бұрын
Does mass of the sample have effect on the results after the analysis?
@kovoproxy2 жыл бұрын
thank you Schatzi
@Vision2676 жыл бұрын
can this measure coating thicknesses in multiple layers?
@alirezanazarahari83425 жыл бұрын
No, it can't. You probably can try XPS for that.
@markcrume3 жыл бұрын
Great explanation. Thank you.
@mugemangangojeanbaptiste57206 жыл бұрын
Can u explain how to use it in tunnels not on the surtface
@JayGotcha52853 жыл бұрын
With all the charisma
@Bored_Trumpet Жыл бұрын
What you expect? Egghead afterall...
@rlrrlrll3 жыл бұрын
At 1:44 wouldn't it be an electron from the outer shells that is excited (and certainly not removed)? Inner electrons are shielded by outer ones. The most inner electrons need the most work to remove them, as they are the closest to the core.
@Double0pi3 жыл бұрын
Nope. XRF removes core electrons. The outer electrons then "fall down" to the lower energy levels, emitting characteristic X-ray spectra as they go.
@rlrrlrll3 жыл бұрын
@@Double0pi Interesting! Never heard of that phenomenon before. I'll ask my prof about that :) thanks!
@Double0pi3 жыл бұрын
@@rlrrlrll Remember that different wavelengths of EM radiation have different energies. In gen chem, you learn that certain wavelengths are emitted when electrons move from an excited state down to a lower level. All of the wavelengths you calculate with the Rydberg equation are UV or visible light. Go down to a lower-energy sort of radiation--infrared--and you no longer have enough energy to excite electrons to the next energy level, so instead you induce molecular vibrations. Go up to a higher-energy radiation and you basically excite electrons right out of the atom! X-rays can absolutely knock electrons out of the valence shell, but in that case we don't see the fluorescence used in XRF. As you mentioned in your original comment, it would take a lot of energy to knock out electrons closest to the core...but X-rays have that much energy! I'll get around to doing my own XRF video some day...not quite ready to do that yet.
@rlrrlrll3 жыл бұрын
@@Double0pi Thank you for the explanations! I assumed Xrays are more powerful, but powerful enough to kick out electrons close to the core, that's pretty exciting :D
@Muonium12 жыл бұрын
@@Double0pi isn't there an error in this video? The narrator says the x-rays knock an election out of "a low energy level", but isn't it a HIGH energy level (hence the need for a photon of such high energy to eject it) and merely a LOW orbital number? Aren't the "outer" valence electrons actually in the lower energy levels? Also I'm afraid I cannot help but notice you are at the Evergreen State college....home to the most infamous incident on any college campus in the nation in the past several years. What is that like, especially being in the science department where there were organized efforts to "decolonize chemistry" and suchlike at the height of the insanity? Were you ever in contact with Bret or Heather?
@ibrahimnazemqader91536 жыл бұрын
Thanks
@nisrinebedroune93254 жыл бұрын
Bonjoure a toute stp j'ai besoin des thèses sur XRF
@chalpudeku75406 жыл бұрын
Thank you
@HuntingtonCora-c7j2 ай бұрын
Smith Paul Hernandez Gary Rodriguez Margaret
@davidcurtis75472 жыл бұрын
Send me information please . I will visit the web site