What Kind of Microscope Camera you Should Buy

[@DragonSimp416]

This was exactly the kind of video i needed desperately. Thank you.

[@eyes21st]

Keep up the good work..👍 Often stuff like this is underappreciated.

[@owlredshift]

Thanks for the great video, man! I know your channel isn't huge- yet... But with enough quality videos like this one serving as sort of the infrastructure, you have the makings to be a hugely successful resource and youtube channel.

[@micro_safari]

Thank you for the kind words my friend. It's comments like yours that keep me going!

[@БогданГапонов-к6ш]

You could just move your phone down inside the phone-holding part of the smartphone adapter and it would work. 2:20

[@pedroantunes8241]

Great video!

[@ClausRow]

My microscope doesn't have the third adaptor port thing, the "barrel". Is there a way to get that blue box to look down the regular eyepiece place?

[@wiggles.]

Yes, at the link in the description you can buy the camera with an adapter to go in the eyepiece of a binocular or monocular microscope for $220

[@alenaelisa5264]

Would you rather recommend using a digital camera and the right setup for it with the microscope to take good photographs?

[@nz_coderman]

Does anyone happen to know substitution of Olympus EP50 for CX23. EP50 should be a good one, but its price is dear. Thanks

[@levinelVoR]

You are missing an important option, specifically a smartphone adapter that is mounted on its own eyepiece, and is swapped with your normal viewing eyepiece. It is very affordable, and on my binocular stereoscope it greatly simplifies switching between binocular viewing and taking pictures. On my Olympus scope, the less sophisticated eyepiece of the adapter is actually a much better optical match with my phone than the Olympus eyepiece. Of course a small amount of refocusing is required. With today's high-megapixel phones, digtal zoom can achieve wonders, and at higher maginifications, you may find yourself using your phone as a viewfinder in preference to binocular viewing.

[@modernkangal]

This needs more likes

[@lotharmayring6063]

Best for microscopy Full-Frame Mirrorless Digital Camera and the software inside

[@micro_safari]

I actually get worse image quality on my mirrorless cameras, mostly because the sensor is not designed for low light environments, which leads to noise in the image. There are some other technical considerations which make regular mirrorless/DSLR camera sensors non-ideal for microscopy too. That being said, if you can absolutely blast your sample with an IMMENSE amount of light, mirrorless cameras will give you the best image. But I am talking amounts of light that the majority of microscopes cannot provide stock.

[@lotharmayring6063]

@@micro_safari that depends on the software of your camera. Normaly mirrorless DLSR cameras have the best sofware for noise reduction, sensivityadaption and so on. But sometimes i use a 4K webcam without the optics, they do a good job for hobbiists

[@durohr232]

Cheap Chinese garbage everywhere.

[@LarsLarsen77]

Just buy an old DSLR.

[@doodskop89rs]

This video doesn't give an answer to the question posed in the title. Therefore a dislike.

[@wiggles.]

He provided all the information to make an informed decision and answer that question based on your personal situation. Therefore a dislike on your comment.