What makes people live and die for nations?

Cultural historian Prof Joep Leerssen explains the power of the imagined community.
“[T]he members of the smallest nation will never know most of their fellow-members, meet them, or even hear of them, yet in the minds of each lives the image of their communion.”
1983: the Cold War kept international relations in deep freeze, but the Shah of Iran had already been toppled by an Islamic revolution. In this year Benedict Anderson intervened in nationalism studies with a book that is as topical and authoritative today as it was 35 years ago. Imagined Communities appeared at a time when the societal roots and the cultural imagination of "the nation" were a hotly contested issue; historians were just becoming aware of the power of informal collective memories and "invented traditions"; postcolonialism was just around the corner; and Anderson’s slim book offered a theory that even-handedly acknowledged both the political and the cultural elements that go into nation-building. Cultural historian Joep Leerssen (UvA) situates the book in the debates of its appearance and in its continuing relevance. How did it help us, in 1983, to understand the historical nature of nationalism, how does it help us today to understand its remarkable revival?
Go to www.sg.uu.nl for more video's, blogs and our current programme.
© Copyright Studium Generale
Doorplaatsen uitsluitend met toestemming en onder vermelding van link en Studium Generale.

[@kehindeonakunle7404]

Excellent topic, analysis and presentation

[@meghkalyanasundaram8720]

~32:29: "Because the nature of nationalism as an ideology is that it is based on culture, it invokes the identity of the nation, it is about manifesting the nation's traditions, the ... "we feeling" of a group that recognises each other culturally, and language and shared memories (etc) and at the same time it is a product of modernity..." [almost verbatim]