Difference between radioactive and radiation. Discussion of half-life and how neutrons are needed to make something radioactive, not being exposed to radiation.
Пікірлер: 48
@dragzgaming3 жыл бұрын
Can we take a moment to appreciate how he wrote all that backwards perfectly lol
@studiosraufncingr69653 жыл бұрын
or you know.. he wrote normally and just mirrored the video in the editing program
@johno9507 Жыл бұрын
You didn't notice his watch and wedding ring are on the wrong side?
@dragzgaming Жыл бұрын
Very observant, I missed that lol
@michaelschwartz9485 Жыл бұрын
He's actually rearranging his molecules to make it look like this. That's very easy for Professor Energy.
@tekashiii Жыл бұрын
"Why is something radioactive?" "I dont know. Marbles. Half life. Lolz"
@Songfugel5 жыл бұрын
I wish this would have been a longer video
@mazdoctorxd5 жыл бұрын
“Many people think: ‘oh my gosh! that’s radioactive! I’m gonna become radioactive!’ No, no, you might become... dead, or get cancer...” Me: that really isn’t helping😂😂😂
@MaruskaStarshaya Жыл бұрын
If you don't protect yourself, as we know alpha and beta radiation could be shielded easily
@TheRWS965 жыл бұрын
Hello Illinois EnergyProf, Could you enable comunity contribution to subtitels, i would like to show this to some other people but they cannot understand english very well so i would like to add a translation.
@sleepib5 жыл бұрын
From the title, I was hoping for an explanation of what makes an isotope unstable. This is just saying it's radioactive because it's radioactive.
@WarrenGarabrandt5 жыл бұрын
Thanks! Saved me some time.
@WarrenGarabrandt5 жыл бұрын
@D.O.A. I'm pretty sure it has to do with the following: 1) the week force governs radioactive decay 2) it is moderated by a particle being created and a force exchanged between those particles 3) certain energies of particles (and therefore their mass) are more likely than others 4) different elements and different isotopes need particles of a certain mass to exist to exchange the right amount of energy 5) if a particle of a certain energy is common, the reaction will occur readily, and if it's very rare, it will take a long time 6) if something isn't impossible, it will eventually happen. 7) when a required particle happens to manifest where its needed, the atom decays 8) "stable" atoms will decay too, it's just that the particles required to mediate it are extraordinarily rare. Let time run it's course, and eventually every atom will decay.
@WarrenGarabrandt5 жыл бұрын
@D.O.A. Every atom and every isotope has some value or range of values that if a particle were there with just the right value of energy, it would cause an atom to undergo radioactive decay. It's just a question of how long to you have to wait, statistically speaking, before you are likely to see one. We've actually proved this. We observed a stable atom undergo decay in one of our neutrino detector. It was extremely unlikely, but it happened anyway.
@justgivemethetruth3 жыл бұрын
@@WarrenGarabrandt Only 90 isotopes are expected to be perfectly stable, and an additional 162 are energetically unstable, but have never been observed to decay. Thus, 252 isotopes (nuclides) are stable by definition (including , for which no decay has yet been observed).
@kaan-urp2 жыл бұрын
the ratio of protons and neutrons inside of a nuclei must be 1 or very close to 1. For example if protons are more than neutrons, it will undergo beta+ decay and one of its protons will become neutron. Sometimes this process might leave the atom in an excited state and it might also radiate gamma rays. Another reason to become radioactive is nucleus might become too big for the nuclear force to keep nucleus intact since it has a very small effect radius. Uranium decays because of this reason. So becoming radioactive from something radioactive is impossible. You have to become something radioactive to be radioactive. You wont have any radioactive particles inside your body naturally. Maybe some isotopes like K40 might get into your body but they can be ignored. I think this is what the video is trying to tell. You either need to fuse some nuclei together or add some free protons or neutrons to some nuclei which requires extra effort. You wont get radioactive from something radioactive.
@danender55552 жыл бұрын
Q: What makes something radioactive? A: Marbles
@RailVentures5 жыл бұрын
How do you learn to write backwards on a see thru blackboard?
@mazdoctorxd5 жыл бұрын
Rail Ventures because skills😂😂😂
@johno95074 жыл бұрын
He doesn't write backwards, he writes normally and the video image is reversed. Didn't you notice his wedding ring is on the wrong hand and he writes left handed, then at 1:40 the image isn't reversed and his ring is on his left hand and he's back to being right handed.
@utkukeskin877210 күн бұрын
cool explanation
@Frankenstec2 жыл бұрын
Im a lay person not a scientist or student and one of the many questions I have is: If Beta radiation is an electron going through your body, how do radioactive materials stay radioactive for so long? Arent the atoms losing electrons? Are there just that many of them? Or am I missing something?
@ValWasTakenWasTaken4 жыл бұрын
Is it good that im atleast procrastinating with my economics studies by learning about radioactivity?
@dinismalpique52493 жыл бұрын
Literally the same here, I'm taking Economics and this is what I decided to do with my time
@ylette5 жыл бұрын
Half-Life 3 confirmed.
@Mr_BRRRRT3 жыл бұрын
When he started writing, making me think he was writing in the contrary just so we could read it, I legit was scared af. Then I realized what it was.
@9999Mihas4 жыл бұрын
So how things actually become radioactive?
@TurdFurgeson2753 жыл бұрын
Nobody has commented on the fact that he's writing backwards without much effort. I was amazed.
@johno9507 Жыл бұрын
He is writing normally on the glass and the image is flipped digitally, even his watch and wedding ring are on the wrong side.
@justgivemethetruth3 жыл бұрын
His watch is on his left wrist presumably ... so since his left wrist is on the left side of the video, the video is flipped across the vertical axis.
@michaelschwartz9485 Жыл бұрын
Professor Energy for President!
@knutritter4615 жыл бұрын
A nice example of radioactivity is baking soda containing potash. If people knew how radioactive it is... noone would dare to eat a cake anymore. 😂
@guesswho60385 жыл бұрын
Baking soda is sodium hydrocarbonate so it's a bad example actually. But, yes potassium is slightly radioactive, so for estimated 140g of average human body potassium content, there's ca. 16mg of radioactive isotope K-40. Would you touch another human again?
@knutritter4615 жыл бұрын
@@guesswho6038 Except there are baking sodas that exhibit a high content of potassium hydrogen carbonate. (KHCO3)
@manify8269 Жыл бұрын
But how and why something changes ....does it happen itself...
@MoltenFungus3 жыл бұрын
I waited a year, and half life 2 came out.
@SigEpBlue5 жыл бұрын
IIRC, the Zippo lighter in the pocket of one of the guys at the SL-1 experimental reactor accident became radioactive, due to neutron bombardment. But yes, I think in light of a prompt-critical event, the last thing you're worried about is becoming radioactive. Perhaps the term _ionizing_ radiation should've been used to distinguish it from other types we shouldn't worry about too much...?
@hankcester17 күн бұрын
Radioactive. An unstable nucleius of an atom
@RyanHannaMusic5 жыл бұрын
OK, are you writing normally on the glass then flipping the camera, or are you actually writing backwards? 😂
@marca65975 жыл бұрын
I was thinking the same thing lmao.
@nobiledigitale5 жыл бұрын
The image is flipped, look at the position of the buttons on his jacket :)
@JesterAzazel5 жыл бұрын
His watch is another clue, when the video shows him in a classroom it's on a different hand. Also, he's right handed.
@sayori39393 жыл бұрын
What makes things radioactive? It's simple that would be my wet socks :3
@suhankumarchoudhury99589 ай бұрын
No, the question is what is radioactivity.
@joneslt2 жыл бұрын
Terrible explanation. This doesn’t even come close to explaining why something is radioactive
@Entroprox9 ай бұрын
Was thinking the same thing
@abhinay4200 Жыл бұрын
Bad explanation should have explained about extra neutrons and protons