"What's 1x1?" Terrence Howard Interview | Chris Vernon Show

----
1-click Subscribe to GCM: bit.ly/subscribe2gcm
Discover the latest Memphis sports community news at: grindcitymedia.com/
~SOCIAL~
Instagram: / grindcitymedia
Twitter: / grindcitymedia
Facebook: / grindcitymedia
Follow the Memphis Grizzlies on KZbin for exclusive team videos and player highlights: bit.ly/subscribe2memgrizz

[@TheBest0704]

This planet is the dumbest its ever been before. We’re living in the movie Idiocracy

[@Liverkiller]

Hahah, yup

[@camisnyder3460]

Hahaha I’ve been saying that for YEARS

[@ChrisFrazierthecoach]

Facts! I am like is it me? But I find comments like this and breathe the breath of relief to know that I’m still normal.

[@davehooper6481]

It was supposed to be a comedy not a prophecy. I would ask this dumbass what would happen if he bought one apple from Walmart just one time. How many apples would he have... TWO? Then I would suggest he start breaking his pills in half and wearing a helmet when outdoors.

[@oui2611]

i mean not really, in actuality you can look back at the 19th century and find that the general western public couldnt even read. its just that today we have the loud minority that screams out crazy shit that sounds dumb making us all look dumber.

[@LOLA-mx7jm]

Who’s here because of Rogan….? And this man was greater but is now more great after listening to him chop game on JoRo.

[@KPSavant]

🙌

[@jermieldeleon]

Facts ! Joe let him cook that whole episode..and I’m grateful for that!.loved it

[@tom_mac]

TLDR: this whole thing is him just misunderstanding how digital computers (calculators) work. the thing he did here with the calculators, his misunderstanding, its because our phones are digital computers. digital computers are actually physically unable to perform calculations using irrational numbers, like the square root of 2. it's literally impossible. if you had an analogue (or quantum) computer and you performed this maths, it would come out as expected, though. see, with a digital calculator you only get so many bits you can use to store a number in memory to perform operations on it, so when you do operations using irrational (irrational numbers go on literally forever after the decimal point) you aren't actually using that number precisely you are instead using an approximation, a rounded off number as close as possible. this works good enough when you are using smaller transformative functions, but the more drastically you change the number through a mathematical operation the greater the inaccuracy becomes, sometimes becoming so far off that the results are utterly useless. this is also why different calculators give different results when working with irrational numbers, because they sometimes have different numbers of bits assigned express a number. for example, an old Casio calculator can only hold 9 digits past the decimal of an irrational number such as pi, so it wraps the 9th decimal place to the nearest sub-number whereas an iPhones calculator with 64 bits used for calculator number memory can hold 16 decimal places before it rounds off - so if you do "pi x 3" on an old Casio, you'll get a different result to the same operation done on an iphone calculator. it's also what you'd get if you did these calculations manually, because at some point you have to decide to round the number off, you literally cant work with irrational calculations without rounding off and entering the realm of approximation, unless you have an analogue computer. think of an analogue computer as being like an abstracted simulation using representative psychical processes, then measuring the changes in the internal parts which moved, as opposed to a digital computer which has little binary switches in it arranged in a pattern to represent things. Terrance often uses things like this which rely on noone in the audience understanding some fundamental feature involved to erroneously explain/justify his instinctual thoughts and feelings about a thing and it's honestly pretty impressive even though it's nonsense. he makes links between things in places where they don't logically follow, constantly, which is a symptom consistent with a few mental illnesses including bipolar and schizophrenia. Dunno which he is suffering from but surely something. I can see how it would be convincing to many, especially how he speaks with charisma and confidence, but it's little more than mental illness and solipsistic narcissism at play. This is what happens when you live in a world of yes men, where noone dares calls your BS, for a lifetime. sorry for the long ass essay lol.

[@datmeme8967]

As long as you realize what a clown show that was. Bro convinced himself that 1x1=2. I'm sure you know the formula for the area of a rectangle? L x W = Area? So how many square feet are there in a 1 foot by 1 foot floor tile? 2? Also, what is he waiting for to demonstrate a flying linchpin? It's been years since he tried scamming the country of Ghana into investing in it and he still hasn't done anything but pay someone to do some computer animations. He claims he has revolutionized so many industries. Name one? Only thing I credit him with is a very rudimentary abandoned patent on a general concept that could be called augmented reality. The rest is like someone who can fake a bunch of words in Chinese being able to convince other people who don't speak Chinese that they are fluent in Chinese. An entertaining and worthless talent.

[@PdWOLFG4NG]

🙏

[@fsacchau]

I'm not here to offend anyone, including Mr. Terrence Howard. Perhaps I can offer an explanation that may clear up this "1x1=2" question. I think that whether it be +, - , *, or /, the units matter. In the case of multiplying, we often ignore the units because we sort of understood what the implied units are. For example, if 1 pound of grapes costs 1 dollar, and you purchased 1 pound, then the equation is [1 pound * 1 dollar/pound = 1 dollar]. The unit 'pound' cancels, and you're left with the answer 1 dollar. That makes sense because you purchased 1 pound of grapes, and so the cost should be 1 dollar. In the day-to-day application, this is often how we use multiplication. We drop the units because they are implied. In the case of a square (with length & width of 1 meter), the area is 1 meter x 1 meter = 1 meter^2. Note how you also multiply the units (I.e., m x m = m^2). If you have a rectangle with sides of 1/2 meter and 2 meters, then the area is also 1 meter^2 [1/2 meter x 2 meters]. This makes sense because if you take the area from a square (1 m x 1 m) and cut it in the middle and put them side by side, it would yield the same area of a rectangle (1/2 m x 2 m = 1 m^2). Math is just a framework like a language but with very strict rules. We have an operation where 1 "operation" 1 = 2. That operation is addition with '+' symbol. If we want to change the meaning of the operation 'x' to addition, then 1 x 1 = 2. Note that even with addition, one should be mindful of the units. For example, 1 dollar + 10 cents, we should convert 1 dollar to 100 cents or 10 cents to 0.1 dollar before adding. Therefore, 1 dollar + 10 cents can be written as 100 cents + 10 cents = 110 cents or 1 dollar + 0.1 dollar = 1.1 dollars. In Mr. Howard's example of 1 penny x 1 penny, Mr. Howard is correct (the answer is not 1 penny; it is 1 penny^2).

[@kharonthecreator]

balance the equation of (1x1=1) you will have (1=0). does 1 equal 0?

[@skyisthelimitreadyornotfor2]

Howard should have made that distinction. 1 penny x 1 penny is 2 pennies, but 1 penny x 1 is just 1 penny.

[@yippikiyay197]

This poor guy doesn't understand fractions

[@RajivSamaroo]

Sorry but of course (sq root 2) cubed is equal to (sq root 2) x 2. What is so confusing about that? Terrence should put on a robe and talk abt happiness and the meaning of life, I’m sure he has a lot of wisdom there. But his math and science are totally bogus. Also, 1x1 means you have one occurrence of 1. So of course it means 1. You can’t disprove math because you think the word multiply means create more. Wait till he discovers multiplying by fractions. 🤣🤯

[@drsjamesserra]

I had a discussion on X about it, somehow a defender didn’t see the point, unbelievable how ignorant people are and how many didn’t pay attention in math class.

[@oui2611]

i mean youre arguing against someone whos againdt the established facts so of course its going to seem bogus because he isnt following the established methods. im not saying he's right, im just saying its pretty obvious to say he's wrong.

[@RajivSamaroo]

@@oui2611 okie

[@JohnNoone-bv5bi]

😂 multiply does mean to create more. Just because this challenges your current beliefs or teachings doesn’t mean to say that what he’s saying is wrong. We’ve been lied to about lots of things in history so why wouldn’t they lie about this? Any Trillion dollar industries that are threatened by his theories will have paid bots and trolls come out to assassinate his character and works. You can see this in every terrence Howard video it’s so obvious. Keep an open mind is all I’m saying.

[@brendanbiddle4875]

Glad somebody caught this. He’s taking the square root of a number then cubing the number. You will never get back to the original number by cubing it. The two processes are not the same and therefore Terrence’s theory is dead.

[@AmCanTech]

Crazy begins at 22:30

[@TimothyC.84]

🐐

[@jessewilliams6459]

Terrence fans: "I failed math, but he tells me my teacher was wrong. That makes me feel smart."

[@buythedip5300]

I was in advanced mathematics but he makes some good points. Try and think outside the box.

[@TheHalusis]

@@buythedip5300 sounding like he makes a good point

[@INeedsMoneys]

@@buythedip5300 yeah most definitely. Some people (most) are too confined by rules set up by other people a long long time ago taking it as the ultimate truth and nothing can ever change it. That's not how progress is made.

[@INeedsMoneys]

@@buythedip5300 love the name btw. I'm always buying the dip. 💯🔥📈

[@jessewilliams6459]

@@INeedsMoneys Not really. I'm an engineer. If something works it works. Do something with it and I'll be impressed.

[@anthonyricciardo]

Terrence's Mistake in a Mathematical Concept: Imagine you have a penny, which is just a single coin. If someone asks you how much one penny times another penny is, it might sound a bit strange because we usually don't multiply money this way. But let's explore this idea together! Multiplication: The Grouping Concept Multiplication is like making groups of things. For example, if you have 1 box and put 1 penny in it, you still have just 1 penny. It doesn't magically double! So, if you multiply 1 by 1 penny, you're not really making more pennies. You still have just that 1 penny, not 2. Note: we said 1 x 1 penny AND NOT 1 penny x 1 penny Understanding Units When we talk about multiplying things, we also have to think about what they are (their units). For example, if you multiply 1 inch by 1 inch, you get 1 square inch, which is a measure of area. This makes sense because inches measure length, and when you multiply them, you're finding out how much space something covers. But what about our pennies? Pennies are money, not lengths or areas. So, if you try to multiply a penny by a penny, you end up with something called "penny squared," which doesn't make sense in real life. There's no such thing as a "penny squared" in your piggy bank or wallet. Adding vs. Multiplying When you have two pennies, you simply add them together to know you have 2 pennies in total. This is adding, not multiplying. Adding is when you put things together to see how much you have in total. Bringing It All Together So, when we talk about 1 penny multiplied by 1 penny, it's likely a mistake to think about it in this way. When you're saying 1 penny x 1 penny, what you're talking about is having 1 group of 1 penny. It's important to remember that this still equals just 1 penny. It doesn't magically turn into 2 pennies just because we used multiplication. Multiplication helps us understand how many things we have in groups, but it doesn't change the amount when we're talking about... 1 group of 1. To clarify, the correct way to think about and write the concept of 1 penny x 1 penny is to see it as 1 group times 1 penny, or simply 1 x 1 penny. The real question multiplication helps answer is: How many groups of pennies do you have? This is what multiplication is truly about. Understanding multiplication in this way helps us see that it's a method for organizing and counting things in groups, rather than changing the nature or amount of what we have. This distinction is crucial in avoiding confusion and ensuring that we apply mathematical concepts correctly in real-world situations. Remember, in mathematics, clarity and precision in how we express and interpret concepts are key. By refining our understanding of multiplication and the units involved, we can avoid misconceptions and build a more accurate picture of the math at work in our daily lives. Money and Math When it comes to money, like pennies, we usually talk about adding them together to find out how much we have. If we have 10 boxes and each box has 10 pennies, that's 10 times 10 pennies, which means 100 pennies in total because we have 10 groups of 10. It's the same with just 1 penny; 1 group of 1 penny is still just 1 penny. Conclusion So, remember, multiplication is about groups and how many things are in those groups. We can't multiply pennies and get more pennies out of nowhere. And when we're talking about units like inches or pennies, we need to think about what those units mean and how they work in real life. I hope this helps clear things up! Multiplication and units can be tricky, but once you understand how they work, it makes a lot more sense. ------------------------------- ZERO: Understanding multiplication involves recognizing it as a method for combining multiple groups of the same size. The concepts of 1 and 0 play essential roles in this process, each serving a unique purpose that is integral to mathematical operations at all levels. The Role of 1 in Multiplication The number 1 is the identity element for multiplication. This means that when you multiply any number by 1, the result is the number itself. This property doesn't diminish the value of 1 in multiplication; instead, it provides a fundamental basis that ensures consistency across mathematical operations. When you multiply a number by 1, you're essentially saying you have one group of that number. Far from being irrelevant, this operation is crucial for maintaining the integrity of mathematical principles. The Role of 0 in Multiplication Similarly, 0 plays a critical role in multiplication. Multiplying any number by 0 gives a result of 0. This reflects the concept that if you have zero groups of something, you end up with nothing. This isn't a sign that 0 'doesn’t multiply' but rather that it applies the rule of having nothing in a consistent and predictable way across all numbers. The existence of this rule makes mathematical operations reliable and understandable, enabling us to build more complex equations and solve more intricate problems. Why "True Multiplication" Includes 1 and 0 The idea of "true multiplication" only starting at 2 disregards the foundational roles that 1 and 0 play in the broader framework of mathematics. Every number, including 1 and 0, has a place in multiplication because they help us understand and organize the world in a consistent manner. To exclude 1 and 0 from multiplication or to give their interactions with other numbers different terms would not only complicate mathematical education but also undermine the coherence and simplicity of mathematics itself. Conclusion In mathematics, clarity, consistency, and universality are key. The rules for 1 and 0 in multiplication provide us with a stable foundation from which we can explore and understand more complex concepts. These numbers allow us to express and solve problems accurately, whether we're dealing with the theoretical underpinnings of mathematics or applying math to real-world situations. Therefore, rather than being excluded or renamed, the roles of 1 and 0 should be embraced for the critical functions they serve within the realm of multiplication.

[@chillinx7268]

That was a life lesson in itself.

[@JB-qm7vt]

Someone please send this person’s explanation to Terence

[@INeedsMoneys]

@@JB-qm7vtthis person misinterpreted terrence tho. Terrence is saying 1 penny times 1 penny equals 2 pennies because of the conservation of energy principle. 2 pennies cant become 1. The person who wrote the small piece of advice here is missing the forest for the trees.

[@garymurakami4867]

Omg there is a simpler way to say it😅

[@tyronewilliams3634]

This is an example of why our country is screwed. We take for granted what is told to us without being able to verify or confirm it. If only one of my friends, me included, have a brain, then all together we have one brain (1x1=1). If 100 of us have a brain, then we have 100 brains (1x100=100). If none of us have a brain, then we are screwed (1x0=0). I don’t know anything about energy conversion theory but if basic arithmetic is not suitable then maybe another tool should be used or created.

[@MilitaryDog.]

I think he’s mistaking 1 x 1 with 1 + 1. 1 item + 1 item means that you have 2 items which have been put together. 1 x 1 means that you have 1 item which grows to the amount of the other item. 1 item grows to the amount of 1 which equals 1. 10 items grow to the amount of 10 which equals 100 100 items grows to the amount of 100 which equals 10,000 With addition you have 2 items in the equation being added into eachother. 5 + 5 = 10 With multiplication you have 1 item which is growing by the other number in the equation by that many times. 5 x 5 = 25 Tho 0 is still an annoying number for me because if you have 1 item which grows by 0 times then you still have the 1 item. It only works if you say that you have 0 items which grow 1 times then you still have 0 items. Math is interesting and just because it’s old doesn’t mean that we have it all figured out. We need to keep testing out our obvious assumptions and never get complacent. There’s always something we’re missing and always something more to learn. We don’t know everything within the universe yet. ✌️😊

[@percyjones8376]

Yep exactly you remember this form 3 grade? Lol this is a good experiment to watch people change basic knowledge because a person in a way over paid profession tells them too… I’m reading people argue about how he is right about 1x0 being 1. I mean you can see it everywhere these days.. Supreme Court justices not being able to say what a women is(even though she is one).. and so on and on.. it’s time for this asteroid to hit we need to start over again

[@davidpettey2698]

Just change your analogy from growing to counting and it works. 1 item that you count once is 1 1 item that you count zero times is 0

[@WLVSTV]

You’re actually using a false equivalency. You are referencing an action not a mathematical sequence. If I count something 1x yes it equals once. With numbers - if you’re multiplying. The number breaks away from original positioning to amplify itself to a new number. 1x1=1 is a broken equation because the number never shifts so it’s a placeholder like the “number” 0 which isn’t a number

[@bobbyknight3836]

@@WLVSTVI’ve been going deep on this for the last few days and that’s a perfect explanation

[@fetB]

@@WLVSTV Terrence, is that you speaking? Theres nothing broken about 1x1. Multiplication is the expression of how many multiples of a value, or item etc, exists. And 0 is a number. It's the mathematical expression of no value.

[@percyjones8376]

I’ve completely lost all faith in humanity

[@C-Llama]

Only gets worse when you read the comments. People with zero education confidently challenging the definition of multiplication. wtf is wrong with our species

[@erraticentertainment]

Good you lacked the iq necessary to understand simple concepts

[@JimmyCooperAustralia]

Na - it's just a small percentage of really loud dumb ones.

[@idicula1979]

FOR LYING TO ME. Terrance Howard 2024

[@JohnNoone-bv5bi]

@@idicula1979lying How?…..because he’s challenging your beliefs? Because nothing ever gets proved wrong throughout history and must be changed because new discoveries have been made? Sure. At least keep an open mind, this is why we are stuck in this way of thinking because people aren’t willing to think outside the box and only accept the so called scholars teachings. There certainly is truth to this otherwise why are the bots and trolls out in force to character assassinate and dismiss his work it’s so obvious. Anything that challenges trillions dollar industries must be suppressed but truth will over come lies.

[@richardzakh7209]

guys the difference is he's trying to multiply number on number, not number on time, it's whole different system in both cases math is correct it means that second initial doesn't have time properties but number's which is quantity, while time has different properties as a whole of itself which can merge with a one, if you ate 1 apple 1 time then you ate 1 apple because time can merge of itself but if you multiply money on money then it's a different story

[@conormooney5786]

He's a special kind of stupid

[@indiig.]

That’s the realization that I came to as well, but now I’m having trouble wrapping my head around how you can multiply a unit times another unit. If I multiply 2 dollars by 3 dollars do I have $5 or $6? Is unit x unit just addition? Can I multiply 2 cats by 2 bananas?

[@baassiia]

Yes he is folling people who are bad in math. Example from 1 grade. One boy recived 1 candy twice (1*2) and Second 1 candy once (1*1) who has more candies. His evaluation about linear math is also wrong 1m*1m is 1m2, a square. 1m*1m*1m =1m3 a cube. We have it covered. As for 4D (adding time) I am not sure what is the status currently but math sciencienst know it's there ;) You can't technicaly multiple 2banana with 3 oranges. You can do muliplocation 3*2 banana or 2*3oranges, wheres first number is muliplicator not object.

[@richardzakh7209]

@@baassiia see that's what i said, you provided me example that multiply on time with a candy, once or twice is a time while Terrence challenges multiplying object by object or action by action, but in our math second initial is just a time, it doesn't mean our math is wrong though

[@baassiia]

@@richardzakh7209 if you insist to multiple then you can do banan =x, strawberry =y. 3x*2y = 6xy which is nor banana nor strawberry just fruit salad. Overall usfullness of that is real life is minimal, that doesn't mean it not exist in math. I gave you other example with metric system when usfullness is obvious 2mx2m = 4m2, a square.

[@cheezius3357]

Greatest quote of all time “Am I crazy or is the calculator broken” - Terrance Howard

[@SchMasHed]

Hes crazy

[@cheezius3357]

@@SchMasHed nah the calculator can’t handle the truth.

[@SchMasHed]

@@cheezius3357 The calculator is largely responsible for your ability to leave a comment on a video that you watched on the internet LMFAO

[@cheezius3357]

@@SchMasHed ok but that has nothing to do with the point of my comment. Anyways have a good one 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻

[@ZerosiiniFIN]

​@@cheezius3357 It has verything to do with it. You're saying calcs are not correct. If they were not correct, all this ICT would not work

[@cartorx1261]

if you have 2 apples once you have 2 apples. 2 apple twice you have 4 apple, that's simple and satisfied bro. 1 apple once you have One apple still. 1 apple 4 times you have 4 apples

[@jankopandza1072]

multiplication is a form of addition. Multiplication is an addition of like amounts. example 2+2+2 = 6 / 2 x 3 = 6 ... the problem he is talking about is that the problem starts with number 1 ... 1+1 = 2 yet 1x 1 = 1 ? if you did not understand let me make it more simple.. 7+7 = 49 why do we use multiplication ? so we do not have to use addition .. 7+7+7+7+7+7+7 = 49 .. so i hope you understood the problem . 1+1 = 2 so why is 1x1 = 1 .. that is where the problem starts

[@AriyahandTiffanie]

@@jankopandza1072Exactly!!!!!! If you have 1 Apple and multiply it by 1. There will be 2 apples I always questioned this when I was in elementary school. I told my daughter when she started school. I don't know why 1x1=1 And 0x1=0 Bcuz it makes no sense. But it's what we're taught in school so just play along. But we know the real answers 😂

[@unknowntea6457]

​@@AriyahandTiffanieif you have 1 apple only once you would only have one apple and that's how × works, you take a number and see how many times you have it (hence why × is also called times) like how 1×2 is 2 and not 3 because you're not adding, you're answering how many times 1 shows up which is twice and that's why 1×1 is 1 because its 1 shown only once not twice or you'd be adding (+) and not multiplying (×)

[@unknowntea6457]

​@jankopandza1072 you proved your own statement false very quickly there lol. You're saying 2+2+2=6 which is 2×3=6 which is correct and also proves that 1×1=1 as you're showing that the original number (2) shown 3 times becomes 6 whilst 1×1 would mean the original number (1) is shown 1 time which is 1 meaning 1×1=1 and 1×2 is 2 and not 3 (which would just be adding) because the original number (1) is being shown 2 times which is 2

[@irish3353]

@AriyahandTiffanie let's say you're out for a walk, and you see one apple once. How many apples did you see. You saw one apple one time, so you only saw one apple. That's multiplication. Another way to think of it is that a multiplication equation is setting up an addition equation. The first number tells you which number you'll be adding, and the second shows how many times that number appears in the addition equation. Take your 7×7=49. 7+7+7+7+7+7+7=49. The number 7 appeared 7 times. Move this to 1×1, so the number 1 will appear 1 time. 1 = 1, thus 1×1=1. Multiplication indicates the amount of times something occurs. Whether it be a sighting of apples or a number.

[@beergut8915]

The first 1 is what you have The second 1 is how many times you have it

[@Thadopeera]

Those that KNOW you don’t have to TELL.. Those you have to TELL won’t LISTEN 💯

[@WilliamLester-lt5sv]

Chris u the Man ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Great interview

[@khalifaal-islam5729]

When your basics are faulty... You laugh at truth

[@kevenbates4313]

In this case yes, but be cautious in never questioning the basics. It's that type of thinking that led Plank to say science advances 1 funeral at a time. The relationship between Newtonian physics and Quantum has everyone's pencils rolling off the desk but no one wants to double-check the foundation.

[@kreasenchetty]

@@kevenbates4313 Yes, I agree with you, but to apply Quantum physics logic to manipulate pure mathematic laws is idiotic and irresponsible. His "revelation" will get the ignorant more confused. Until he can prove the pseudo science, best he stick to his popularity contest through acting.

[@kevenbates4313]

@@kreasenchetty Salty lmao

[@shyheemjohnson9100]

@@kevenbates4313 this is true but there’s nothing wrong with an open mind

[@shyheemjohnson9100]

Not saying he right or wrong

[@Ynaffit_76]

I've always known that Cardi is smarter than what ppl have been giving her credit for..Cardi will be doing fine I do believe 2024 will be her year..everybody gotta go thru their pain first before they get back up..this pain will bring out the best of her later

[@dreddmann9292]

just because someone was being dumb yesterday doesn't mean that they are being dumb today. we all continue to learn and grow, learning is not just a 1 time thing. it's an everyday thing. we all have the ability to learn and we all have been guilty of just being dumb.

[@capwb]

She used to drug and rob people

[@s133p3r0]

@@dreddmann9292 You are confusing intelligence with wisdom. You can be dumb and still have wisdom. Intelligence is your capacity for problem solving and understanding. It has nothing to do with growing or learning.

[@DustinGunnells]

He was good in Electric Dreams TOO!

[@legatesfamily]

its crazy that he explains the fun facts of 1*1=1 to get peoples minds turning because his real discovery is so beyond the simple math equations that if you can see the problems with the simple math then you wont see the errors on bigger equations

[@347LisaLisa]

Yes because our equations in math are sentences the reasoning comes more from sentence structure than empirical (universal) math which is toroidal and causal (cause and effect).So 1 and 1 again is two ones therefore 2. Best I can understand so far❤

[@das_it_mane]

Sorry to say you didn't understand anything because there's nothing to understand. He's simply wrong.

[@Binahx86]

@@das_it_mane He is wrong, but he is just trying to fix what's wrong. He talks about 1 because math itself is wrong, e.g, we can multiply by 0 but we cant divide by it, how is that possible? So he is right to say there is something wrong, his solution is wrong i agree.

[@qwertzundefinedapfel3830]

"[...]because his real discovery is so beyond the simple math equations" Actually his real discovery is quite simple, if effective: If you talk enough garbage there will be people who think this isn't garbage but higher wisdom and are willing to pay a lot of money for it.

[@humanbean3]

@@siliconvalleymetal its semantics as far as I can tell. maybe he wants to change the word "multiply" or something. our math has gotten us to the moon and back for god's sake. the actual math can calculate how an object can rubberband and boost off a distant planet's gravity and propel an object to intercept with another object that is orbiting the earth at 35k miles an hour, with the precision of inches. how is this math wrong ?

[@batfink274]

Anyone who doesn't know that 1 lot of 1 is 1 is not worth listening to imo.

[@cgptony11]

Love it

[@kalinamasash1137]

Thank You Terence , Greeting from Poland :)

[@theultimatereductionist7592]

I saw some comments on Professor Dave Explains' channel about some nutjob named Terrence Howard, and I just assumed: oh, surely that's not the ACTOR Terrence Howard who stars as Rhodie in the first Iron Man movie (2008). So I did a search on YT just now... OH FUCKING SHIT! It IS the same person! MY GOD it proves acting requires NO BRAINS!

[@davehooper6481]

He should try taking on the role of a sane person.

[@NickiePaschal]

I love hero 6 that's one of me and favorite Disney movies❤❤❤

[@roxanneharris7435]

Terence Howard is one of a kind I believe he's a genius. And he made a lot of sense to me. People always say people who are different are crazy. People who are different see the light they are chosen. Thank you Terrence Howard For sharing your knowledge.

[@chriscolby4578]

Even as kid we question these things yet we get told, it's right just because we say so.

[@thakurv1]

Or you were just a child and still think like a child

[@chriscolby4578]

@@thakurv1 or its time to evolve and change the way we do things or does that scare you "change"

[@chriscolby4578]

@@thakurv1 and I bet you believe that the great pyramid of Giza was just a tomb for a king just like you were told to believe so.

[@ethanivey8018]

@@chriscolby4578Literally everything he said in his math segment was just spewing nonsense. Anybody who has gone through proper algebra knows there is no “mathematical fallacy” in his loop

[@tinmanjad]

One thing I’ve noticed and it’s just what I’ve noticed since Covid is that a lot of people are into conspiracy theories I’m hearing it everywhere. I’m seeing it all over social media and I’m seeing friends of mine share crazy conspiracy theories on social media and I am also one of them, but I do not let myself jump down the rabbit hole. I just wonder if other people are noticing this.

[@thaburninator0904]

Im so annoyed right now because I got click baited into this Terrance Howard video sometime earlier this week, and now I am stuck in a section of youtube with 0x1 people that know how multiplication works.

[@VoidChakra]

If 1x1= 1+1 =2 then 3 x 3 = 1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1+1= 12 but in real life if I have 3 pigs and I have to feed them 3 bag each I still need 9 because pig 1 gets 3 pig 2 gets 3 and pig 3 gets 3. Still I need 9 bags. So how does 3 + 3 + 3 = 9 but 3 x 3 = 12

[@Unizuka]

​@@VoidChakrabro 3 x 3 is the same as 3 + 3 + 3, it's like saying you have a 3 cartons, each carton contains 3 apples, so how many apples you have in total? 3 + 3 + 3 = 9 apples

[@bandupjosh7709]

@@VoidChakra 3x3=9

[@Player-gx1eo]

People need to go back to first grade if they think that 1x1=2. They just don't understand the basics

[@Accoooo-mufc]

@@Player-gx1eo2

[@takodawhitefeather]

Why be afraid to challenge your own thinking/reasoning? I welcome this type of dialog, whether I understand it or not. I would keep digging and searching, and learning.

[@shamlotbestrhapsever7437]

Except that everything and anything from basic finance to the very systems that allow us to communicate on this website are derived from proven and logical foundations set forward by the mathematics we know and understand today. He claims to have proven or invented or created things, none of which have come to fruition at all. His arguments take advantage of the fact that the majority of people aren't exceptional at math, much less understanding syntax and "identities."

[@takodawhitefeather]

@@shamlotbestrhapsever7437 That's how you feel, but it's not up to you. I've learned that much of what we've been programmed with, and directed to think, is essentially flawed and only told from a slanted perspective by the "ruling classes". So no... keep digging, don't stop exploring, and never cease to question what you're told. I no longer trust mainstream academia/scholarship.

[@BraveStarEric]

@@shamlotbestrhapsever7437 you ever thought that perhaps we should be even more advanced in 2024? Maybe there is a fundamental flaw that is holding us back. For example Why are we still using the same electrical grid from the early 1800s when nikola Tesla have already conceptualize universal wireless electricity? You mean to tell me we still haven’t been able to realize his designs from 1880s? It’s this same lack of open mindedness that is holding us back from the stars wouldn’t you agree?

[@owenswabi]

No one is afraid. They’re upset that someone who apparently has influence is saying 1x1=2 and is convincing people of it

[@69revenga]

@@BraveStarEric If Terrance howard is correct, then every innovation we have made including the wheel, cars, AC/DC power, circuitry and radio transmission wouldn't be possible. his views directly contradict and prevent these from occurring. you mention Tesla's wireless electricity fantasy, but there is a well known physic issue with it called "inverse sixth-power falloff rate". so its is useless for anything much more than charging a cellphone on a mat with a coil embedded right inside of it or at a distance of maybe a meter powering the simplest, tiniest device for a very short period using a one meter diameter coil. The fact that people who are failures in life and listen to pseudoscience that makes them feel like they're smarter than everyone is really sad.

[@Grimaldo354]

This is a good representation of how horrible our education standards have become while also indulging in utter schizoidal nonsense.

[@AlexanderduMoulin-wm5uf]

It scares me how right u are.

[@xoxolol2738]

Prove him wrong then

[@DoYouDJ]

Thanks for this you is not lyin.

[@emmjay1537]

When 1=1....1*1 is 1. $1 is not 1. $1 does equal 100 pennies, 4 quarters, 10 dimes, and 20 nickels..BUT 1=1. As soon as he states that 1 is anything other than 1. Has a value other than 1, IT'S NO LONGER 1. Where are his people? He needs help.

[@jtris01]

Lets splve for x, now shall we? x³ = 2x x³ - 2x = 0 x(x² - 2) = 0 x = {0, -sqrt(2), sqrt(2)} There is no surprise he chose the square root of two as his example, because its a splution of this answer. It does NOT imply, however, that this is true for all numbers.

[@msjazzy89]

I think that’s part of the why he’s saying that there’s a problem because the formula is not consistent even at this basic level. Im about to study his other material to gather more before dismissing it

[@jtris01]

@@msjazzy89 No, it isn't a formula. It's just an equation. If you took a 6th grade math class you would know that equations only ever have infinite solutions where the same value equals itself. Such as x = x. In the video, Terrence asserts that it doesn't make sense for the square root of two cubed be equivalent to the square root of two times two. However, in my explanation it makes perfect sense. He makes a logical fallacy, asserting that x³ = 2x is equivalent to sqrt(2)³ = 2 * sqrt(2). He uses this logical fallacy, for people like you, who don't understand the underlying math, to make it seem like there is something fundamentally wrong with how our math works. However, critical thinking demonstrates otherwise.

[@msjazzy89]

@@jtris01 I majored in Math, so formula and equation can be used interchangeably... If you went to kindergarten you would know this🙄. You should visit his site and read the entire proof and other literature he’s referencing, because your brain seems to not be able to grasp the conceptual understanding of his assertions.

​@@msjazzy89you did not major in math. He has a very simple misunderstanding of how square roots function. If you took even basic high school algebra and did well, you would understand his mistake.

You don't need to go through all that to see why Howard is confused. It's more about how square roots function. The square root of 2 can be written as 2^(1⁄2). It's the same thing. Just a plain 2 is the same thing as 2^(2⁄2) because the 2/2 is equal to 1. But when you multiply numbers with exponents, the exponents are added together, so: 2^(1⁄2) x 2 is the same thing as 2^(3⁄2), which is also the same thing as (2^(1⁄2))^3 or the square root of 2, cubed. Terrance just does not understand math.

[@joeveevo]

Here’s them problem in his logic imo. In much simpler terms than anyone else I’ve seen comment. The square root of 2 is 1.4etc. Meaning if you take 1.4etc and add .4etc of 1.4etc to 1.4etc you will get 2. Now when you cube 1.4etc, first you are taking 1.4etc and multiplying it by 1.4etc like I did before equaling 2 and then multiplying by 1.4etc again. Making the operation 2x1.4etc giving you 2.8etc now when you do what he told the other person to do you are simply multiplying 1.4etc x2 which is the exact operation you are performing in the set of operations he told the first person to do. Meaning he told them to do the exact same thing but made it convoluted enough that they didn’t realize they were performing the exact same operations and leaving them baffled as if they witnessed some flaw in basic mathematics. Someone who believes he is right please enlighten me.

[@andromedadelux]

That explanation as to why it is flawed was horrible but. What he explained with the 2 loop can actually be done with every number as long as you divide by the original number itself. Square root of 2 = X number. Take X number and Cube it. Then divide by 2 and you'll get X number. Then cube it and you get a repeat etc. Square root of 5 = X number. Take that number and Cube it. Then divide by 5 and you'll get X number. Then cube and you get a repeat etc. ^ you can do it with every number. The loop is in the division. You can't create the "loop" if you took Square root of 5 = X number. Take that number and Cube it. Then divide by 2 and you'll get X number. Then cube it and you won't get a loop at all because you didn't use the same number to divide. He leaves out this kind of experimentation and the reasoning is selective if you only use 2 to divide without considering that any other number used if repeated in the same way will just create repetition.... The only thing I've heard him be accurate on is the explanation of zero in physics for energy. Which obviously cannot exist within the calculation of any of those equations because the presence of energy removes the possibility of zero in the first place. Which runs into complications with information and the whole black hole thing initially because the old ideation of the black hole didn't consider energy in a proper way where some idiot decided to give a black hole properties that don't exist. Even when its 1000% obvious that anything going into a black hole just gets shot out the other side like....who wasn't paying attention to the actual images and thought it just blanked out? Wtf were they smoking....he states theres a problem with the loop but there really isn't cause you're just literally making the loop yourself with selection of the numbers involved. He plays a fun numbers game but unless I'm missing something I don't see any significance in looping the numbers yourself.

[@macbird-lt8de]

@@andromedadelux the part where he said "x^3=2x=x+x" may have x^(1/2) as the only solution. Not that it means anything lol, but it's a cute puzzle to ask somebody to solve for x.

[@macbird-lt8de]

lol he calls it "an unnatural equation and a mathematical fallacy". what a guy.

[@GamblingDogs-go7lu]

a square root of a number is a number that when it multiple itself it gives us the original number ... example the square root of 4 is 2 , because 2x2 is 4 .... again the square root of 9 is 3 , because 3x3=9 ... so the square root of 2 , is 1.41421356237 meaning 1.41421356237x 1.41421356237 =2

[@user-ej7be9mm7s]

He’s right multiply means to increase point blank period.

[@rafaelalexanderrafaelfelic7272]

A honest man need to be honest like the sun needs to sine the dishes man will trustly sell but honor he has none tarrence Howard thanks for speaking the truth the wold need more people like you I alsow know about the tree of life lots of Knowles

[@user-hj2sm9gk5n]

You're so smart Pal . 👏👏👏👏

[@null_s3t]

Alternate title: Terrence Howard needs to go back to elementary school.

[@erraticentertainment]

You lack the iq to grasp this concept and that's fine lil bro

[@kellyjackson4973]

Hustle and flow is my favorite movie

[@billycake5830]

I'm sorry to hear that

[@eddie9201]

I would propose that in mathematics, esp multiplication, we put a unity exemption where 1x1=2, ie: 1 multiplied by any number = multiplier +1 or = 1+1=2. Hence 1x0 =1, 1x2=3, 1x10=11, 1x1234=1235... Thus $1 x $1 = $2. 1 apple + 1 apple = 2 apples...etc.

[@ClevelandDelaney]

Salute🏆 Peace ✨ Power⚡ and Prosperity👑 Thanks for letting me in the club in Atlanta years ago I told you I was going to be a Music Producer and I now Have my Bachelor's in Audio Production. You have always been real and a great person Salute God 💯🎆👑 I told you thanks for doing hustle and flow when I caught you coming up the stairs at the club I had my laptop in my hand making beats if you don't remember. 🎆

[@santtu1875]

Bro is mentally insane😂

[@Nextsession271]

Much Respect to you Mr. HOWARD. I proposed this same idea to a mayoral candidate years ago. HE said he was extremely interested in my idea, and he would call me, but never called. I was even willing to donate my own personal equipment for the children's development. I've since moved out of that city. Most inner city legislation is not interested in truly helping out troubled youth. SMH

[@createa.googleaccount713]

YOU ARE OUR TRUE HERO!!! ❤🏆🏆🏆🏆🏆🎖🏅🥇🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻👏👏👏👏👏👏🙌🙌🙌💣🤜💥🤛💫🧨🎆 Soooo sorry to heat this, I hope this Dude CALLS 📞 YOU!!! AND INVITES YOU & INCLUDES YOU!!!

[@anthonyricciardo]

Unfortunately Terrence's thought process and logic is flawed here. Its simply a mistake in the mathematical concept of multiplication. I have provided a full proof and explanation above in the comments.

[@s133p3r0]

@@anthonyricciardo 1 times 1 OCCURENCE. It's very simple, pretend there is a vending machine with apples in it, if you get a ticket that says 5 on it, you get to press the button on the machine 5 times till you use all the credits. If you get a ticket with 1 apple on it, how many apples do you get? 1 or 2?

[@anthonyricciardo]

@@s133p3r0 not sure what you are talking about… but one ticket gets you one apple. If you have a ticket and already have an apple, you end up with 2… 1 apple from the machine and 1 apple that you started with?

[@NothingTrue11]

@@anthonyricciardoisn’t that 1+1?

[@jodiemac6865]

You rock.. I'm learning so much

[@miraclelove991]

Love Terrence🎉🎉🎉🎉💙💙💙💙💙💙💙❤️💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙💙

[@justintaylor7837]

Mang, great to be here mang

[@lachlanandrews5805]

Im tha only muddafarkin sekurity up in ere mane 😂

[@user-ph9sc9dp2z]

Terrance is such a great guy. Loved Hustle and Flow, that movie changed my life

[@drownyall]

How?

[@808estate2]

@28:05 Foreshadowing at it's finest, now JRE😂

[@9Either_Being]

When he said “I can fix it” i really pictured a solution being created or rebirthed.

[@brandiepittman]

I love this podcast. The fundamentals to love of life.

[@JeanneCiampa]

Gorgeous man

[@kelilahqetsiyah6925]

... and an absolute genius.

[@BobbyWashingtonvlog]

Terrance is speaking facts and they are joking around. If our basics are off because of deliberate bad programming, we need to change it

[@Vanillabean520]

Nothing Terrance is speaking is remotely close to facts its delusions of grandiosity, he has a god complex and some social notoriety.

[@CaptainDavidNMartinLawEn-nl2qe]

Sir , I wish to tell you a little of what I have found in my studies since ending my 33 year career in and upon the Sea Bering crew engineer captain owner. I was interested in Law and started down that rabbit hole as after listening to you , you did the same with math and I find the flower of life most interesting and you are a wise man sir , and dedicated to your pursuit and seem to be selfless in sharing now you said you patented your work and that is wise sir as most are selfish , I comprehend fully that we all must be to be able to help others . What I found disturbs me and last year in June I wrote 2 affidavits and had them notarized ( notary public sits higher upon the judicial chain of command than the 2 lower court justices) 1 proclamation of Emancipation of legal and legal entity upon the grounds that ownership of legal (fake contractual law , note lower case) it is secret as was with the birth certificate legal entity unknowing by the parents or guardian signing that document pledges the baby legal entity , prior th 1938 you are born Law est. Free .

[@michaelm3363]

1 group of 1 apple gives… 1 apple in total. I think. Let me just check my work here. Oh yep, still equals 1 😂

[@maamenotjahere7974]

1X1=1 no argument

[@AP_Designs]

Well in our current way of thinking it does.. what he's suggesting though is 1 group of 1 apples = 1 group of 1 apples = 2 separate things = 1 group + 1 apple. You don't now have 0 groups of 1 apples or 1 group of 0 apples. The law of conservation of energy states that energy can neither be created nor destroyed - only converted from one form of energy to another. With that way of understanding, it makes sense.

[@zainodeenisaacs3158]

I might not be a mathematician... but 1X1[will always][= 1. I thing his not understanding the language of math. if I had to solve (1X3= or 3X1), I would say 1+1+1= or 3 =, if this math looks wrong to you, then WOO to you. No disrespect To Terrence Howard, but stick to acting.

[@UraStr]

@@AP_Designs shrooms or acid?

[@iandralikbooker1109]

If you give a person 1 apple they could share and grow more with the seeds......or a person could be selfish and eat the apple and waste the seeds, then yeah one =one.....or one could equal a lot to one person.... There's a story in the bible about Talents......check it out...... Jesus feed thousands with 5 loaves of bread and 2 fish....😂😂😂sometimes its not what you got but what ro do with it...... KATT Williams been on tour 19 yrs and pays well self owned business and supports other comedians....that One man multiplied his Talent ❤❤❤

[@lakeshamayes722]

If someone would have told me this in second grade, I may have liked Math more instead of history; AND the Kaleidoscope obsession as a kid!!! This was on point!!! Nice.

[@scottmorrison1561]

Do you get that 1x1=1 though, because one lot of something counted once, equals once. To do 2x2 would be two lots of something, counted twice; that means theres four lots. If you have one lot of something counted zero times (1x0) then it wouldn't be counted at all (because you times'd it by none, zero (no times)). Language is imperfect, so I understand that 1x1 can be confusing; but ultimately with multiplication were talking about how many groups of something there are after counting them all up. Terrence is getting confused around the language used with multiplication, which leads him to conceptualise math incorrectly.

[@pwayne219]

​@@scottmorrison1561 It doesn't make sense if you think about it. If you multiply something zero times (2×0=0) why is it zero and not the number. Why does the number go away if u multiplied it zero times?

[@scottmorrison1561]

@@pwayne219 All I can say is that language is imperfect and the word 'multiply' by the way we usually define it might not be the perfect word for it, since we already have an established concept of what that word means outside of a math context. If you want to understand what multiplication is and what it is not I'd suggest looking it up. Once you understand the idea in full then feel free to critique it again; but I'd recommend understanding it in full first.

[@help4343]

@@pwayne219 Because if you have no(zero) 2s you don't have it, do you?

[@ReneeJohnsonakaRaeJ]

Yes, Terrence… come on with that Union!! You have the power… don’t need permission!!!

[@Timisme1926]

As he talks about hustle and flow, describing, is white magic, it’s real, it’s truth, it’s life. If you enjoy movies, this movie is inspiring. If you aren’t inspired and if you haven’t done similar to try and get what you want out of life, you aren’t doing it correctly.

[@timothythegreat6294]

i hope he has the strength to get through his inner demons empaths have it hard man

[@Garden2021Ruth8]

Pray creator prepare a special gader ha qodesh as he continues to bring truth debunking all we’ve been taught all our life from people we trust. wonder if they will admit their atrocities related to greed and control as they are now being unveiled

[@Kamza8eight]

Terrence Howard 🙌🏼🔥 keep unveiling the True Nature of existence

[@syndon7052]

You betta whoop that Trick! xD

[@user-db2gz9fc9d]

I have cracked all secrets, Da vinci, Nikolas Tesla, Terrence Howards (Flower of Life) ect.

[@trustyWeedGuy]

​@@user-db2gz9fc9dExpound

[@anthoneeduke3482]

@@user-db2gz9fc9dalso if u have crack my brain open with the knowledge

[@anthoneeduke3482]

@@user-db2gz9fc9dur carbon jus like me 666 now where we go out from this body is different but u are still in it besides sleeping unless this is a energy that’s isn’t yours originally

[@ThomasConover]

6:12 “I’m just doing it to mess with everybody” - Terrence the worlds biggest troll

[@AlixBrignol]

I love you bro! No fear

[@user-ct5de2tt4l]

1 TIMES ANY NUMBER, IS ITSELF. pretty simple to understand. He says 1x1 fails to satisfy the term "multiply. Multiply means obtain from (a number) another that contains the first number a specified number of times. Obtain from (1) another that contains the fist number (1) a specified number of times (1). one 1 is 1...

[@alicedoors4826]

lol yh his problem seems to be his definition of multiply

[@Leomerya12]

Then 1 times 0 is 1, based on that same reasoning. There's flaws in his logic. A better way to understand multiply is as an instance. Zero instances of One is leaves you with a total of Zero. One instance of One leaves you with a total of One. Two instances of One leaves you with a total of Two. Etc.

[@leowhite9873]

🤣Its still one zero aint it ?@@Leomerya12

[@rj_lab]

@@Leomerya12 it is till zero based on his logic, not 1.

[@RaidoKivioja]

@@rj_lab no its not

[@fetB]

24:18 not necessarily, it describes how often a thing exists

[@christinecoates9449]

The flower of life starts from a single circle at the centre of the symbol, meaning life from a single circle from creation onward

[@ryancromwell4092]

A group is more than to put several things together that are similar

[@jeremygraves7982]

Terrence unironically seems like a fun guy to be around

[@Christian_Ada1]

Please stop saying unironically It’s overused because if the internet

[@kevenbates4313]

Very true, I would love to have a few hours to privately talk with him about physics and ideas about the universe, he is a very creative thinker.

[@bradleyhayman2682]

If you like hanging out at the funny farm

[@s133p3r0]

@@kevenbates4313 Just talk to a schizophrenic vagrant, it will make about as much sense.

[@_Majunior]

​@@Christian_Ada1it's the same sentence without the use of it. I'm so tired of seeing it

[@user-ky7dn4qw3s]

Absolutely on point brother

[@anthonyricciardo]

Similar to Terrence, however, his reasoning and logic are misguided. It's a fundamental error in understanding the concept of multiplication. I've detailed a complete proof and explanation in the comments above.

[@grislyghost]

Totally agree about making the Theater a bigger social, educational, and political space.

[@GodsChild0144]

FACTS 💯😇🙏🏽👑💝

[@jamesmiles1329]

Just so you all know 1 + 1 = 3. We all have been lied to.

[@lokanoda]

One human being times one human being makes three :)

[@efmartinez5276]

Correct 🚼

[@JUST-IN..MOBILEPODCAST]

BECAUSE AS SAID IN THE BIBLE NOT TRYING TO BE BIBLICAL BUT IT IS SOMETRUTH..WHEN 2 IS IN THE MIDST I AM THERE

[@Madonnalitta1]

​@@lokanodanope. One human plus one human equals two humans. Don't mistake math with biology. If me and my partner walk down the road, another human doesn't just appear. It's still just the two of us.

[@ochodamagician2212]

Anybody else here after seein Terrance Howard interview wit the wig on 😅

[@jayempowers]

I'm here after watching THAT interview, then after watching his full Oxford Address! This man is a genius In Real Life!!

[@plantpapi614]

That wasn’t a Wig

[@ochodamagician2212]

@@plantpapi614 what was it then?

[@mangugas837]

it was a wig...he was coming off a movie set, look it up

[@argonlitium2837]

@@jayempowers "This man is a genius In Real Life!!" you are imbecil

[@michaelandersen4484]

how come when I go to the shop with 1 trolley and I put 1 item in it ... I only have 1 item in my trolley ... shouldn't there be 2 items in my trolley if ... 1 x 1 = 2

[@maniphaces]

I pretty much dig everything my dude says, and I really respect and am inspired by everything he is doing- however my perspective on the whole 1x0 thing [because no one asked for it;] - I learned multiplications by teaching myself that it asks a question: "what's inside ___ groups of some number"? You might have been taught this way also. So, it obviously goes like this 2X3 = 2 groups of 3 (of something) = 6 things total in these groups. 1x1 = 1 group of 1 (something). getting to the point 1x0 = 1 group of nothing means no group- so yeah it sounds like a trick question so we rewrite it to sound more logical; 0x1 = 0 groups of 1 (aka what's inside of zero groups of 1) = still sounding like a trick question but it still tells you that basically you already know that there is either "nothing there" [but since "nothing" doesn't exist] or its "saying you did not create a group". Basically, it's a question that should not be asked. Or it's a rhetorical question at best. But the world likes to see complete patterns "everything must be included" so 0x1 must be included in the times table. But why ask the question? It's like asking "if I stand still- how fast did I run- or how far did I go"? Again "nothing" doesn't exist. Nothing would be an oxymoron to the concept of existence itself. 0 is basically no more than a place holder for mental constructs - or as mentioned before, it represents the absence of action/creation/manifestation; "you created 0 groups of one or 1 group of 0". It's still a statement being made, equivalent to "at the start of the timer til the end, you did not take any action". zero represents everything that was not done. Which in the case it's almost a synonym for infinity; because there will always be an infinite number of things that does not happen. If at the fork in the road, you go left, well you did not go right. Thus, "not going right" is represented as 0

[@paolaespino1437]

Always said that empire and hustle and flow were a continuation 🔥

[@ReneeJohnsonakaRaeJ]

Yessss! You said it!! 🙌🏽

[@jamescarver5876]

A square that’s 1 unit by 1 unit gives an area of one square unit . If I hand someone one dollar, one time, they’re up one dollar. If I overlap one horizontal line with one vertical line, they intersect once. If I do 11x11 I get a number ending in one for some reason. If I fill up a checkerboard with one row and one column, one square is filled up. If I multiply any two odd numbers together, the product is always odd. Seems to work in every application. But 1x1=2 because of energy or something

[@JackTheMimic]

Multiplication is the question: How many objects is a single object in groups of itself what number of times? How many apples are 4 groups of 5 apples? 20, right? How many apples are 1 group of 1 apples? Linguistically, that question doesn't make any sense. It's either undefined or zero GROUPS of apples. Terrance seems to just take the word group to mean more than one object. So the minimum for objects within a group is 2. He also makes the point that only 1 and 0 have heuristics that are not imperical, just dogmatic. Multiply something by 1, and it equals itself. Multiply something by 0, and it equals 0. Why do you know from A x B = B That A equals 1? Why, imperically, not dogmatically? Why do you know from A x B = A That A equals 0? How do you know that besides the dogmatic repetition, that zero times anything equals zero? Why can't you do that with ANY other number? These are the crazy questions that everyone just laughs off instead of working through imperically.

[@humanbean3]

@@JackTheMimic say what

[@JackTheMimic]

@@humanbean3 I don't know if you literally didn't read it, or you don't understand what is written there. Lol

[@humanbean3]

@@JackTheMimic I can't understand the point you're making. I'm not smart but I can usually understand stuff If I try hard enough. I know 0 times of something is 0 empirically and dogmatically. I know 1 times of something is that something empirically and dogmatically. I kind of understand not liking the word "multiply" because it has a different definition when not used in math context though.

[@nosajc0okies364]

@@humanbean3 @humanbean3 When you express 1 x 1 = 1 you are saying 1 group of 1. But grouping can't occur this way it's singular, so the expression becomes void through that context. 1=1 not 1x1=1. The equation implies that there is more then one, otherwise we wouldn't get 1x1=1 or 1=1 it would just be 1. They made a mistake putting 0 or x at the base of the multiplication table, because it should just be represented as 1, there should never be a 1x1. Why have 0 if nothing exists in the first place, you got a group of nothing so how dumb were we to group nothingness and then calculate everything off nothing, so 256 of what couldve been multiplied by 0 (representing the groups) is equal to 0. Or 256 groups full of nothing, 0 = 0. What? Then to go 1x1=1, 1 is 1, its not 1 is 1 equals 1. This is why he gets you to "square root" 2 and and cube the result (not square it). 1Group x 1Thing = 1thing doesn't make sense, why group 1 thing. How did you isolate 1 thing into 1 group and ignore what you isolated it from.

[@orangelimesky]

He's exactly why affirmative action needs to stop and merits should be the only factor.

[@stevendibble5739]

'You gotta whoop that trick' - T.Howard, 2024

[@kreasenchetty]

Terence Howard defination of multiplication: " To make more..." Terrance Howard proof of a fundamentally flawed mathematical system and the basis of Terrology: "Cool calculator trick to wow your friends"

[@lokanoda]

Yeah, he's stuck up in his own ass

[@miikavihersaari3104]

It's not even a cool calculator trick, but a simple equation: x^3 = 2x, div both sides by x: x^2 = 2, take square root: x = sqrt(2) So in order for cubing x to be the same as multiplying x by two, x must be the square root of two. EDIT: To be precise, the equation has three solutions: x = sqrt(2) x = -sqrt(2) x = 0

[@thumuslol]

If anyone is reading this and maybe be a bit confused by math notation, that totally normal… math difficult for many people, you can think of x^3 as 3 x’s being multiplied by eachother so x times x times x which is commonly represented as (x*x*x) using the astrix to represent multiplication. Since we dont know the value if x since it is a variable, you cannot divide it by two and reduce it to (x*x), that would only work if the value of x was 2. Dont let this terrence moron make you an idiot too…

[@miikavihersaari3104]

@@thumuslol No one's dividing x^3 by 2 to get x^2.

[@diji5071]

​@@miikavihersaari3104consumption = time ²

[@joelstanley993]

He needs his own podcast called Terrance does bad math.

[@dbuck2862]

you do know that math has never been 100% right, it the closest equation that solve the problem. This is why you can get a solid number with point behind it that go on to infinity after a calculation. example 192.034434434----- they teach you this in middle school math. so if he is saying that math isn't right he close to right as they used old method that been used to now, and new technology could prove their a better math system that we never new until now.

[@peacetoall1858]

He's wrong. To answer as clearly as possible - 7 x 7: This is a true multiplication scenario. We have 7 groups, each with 7 items. Multiplying these quantities gives us a total of 49 items (7 x 7 = 49). 1 x 1: This isn't a typical multiplication scenario. Here, we only have 1 group and 1 item. We're not really multiplying anything; we're simply acknowledging the existence of a single item. Key takeaway: 1 x 1 = 1 establishes the presence of a single unit. 7 x 7 = 49 represents the total after multiplying multiple groups of units. While they don't directly correlate in a strict multiplication sense, 1 x 1 lays the groundwork for understanding multiplication as repeated addition.

[@Hawkspeaks2me]

He mixes simple math with geometrical operations. 5x5=25, my understanding: Five sets of 5= 25, or multiple addition, (1x1=1: 1 set of 1 =1) you start throwing squares and roots in there, now you are talking about higher math that relates to the circle, which ends up with irrational numbers, many times. I'm not a mathematician and cannot throw things like distributive functions into the conversation, but it seems Terrance has skipped over some basics. His calculations of negative space are brilliant though!!

[@fafunvideography]

That's so funny, 1x1, i used to look at that when learning math, and over the years, my gut was like, what?! Lol

[@dominicellis1867]

If 1*1 = 2, then 1/1 doesn’t equal 1 and all of algebra collapses. Without identity elements we can’t stay within the field of real numbers and nothing makes sense. Super symmetry does not exist, it’s a promise made by string theory. What he’s talking about is a perfect engine with no entropy, it’s not impossible but statistically improbable to the greatest degree. An engine that looses no energy to heat or sound would theoretically be able to fly perfectly tangentially so that all of the subsequent energy could be harnessed for the landing at the destination. That is genius but highly improbable.

[@trustyWeedGuy]

​@@dominicellis1867but what if?

[@VesicaChloeAstrology]

fr

[@LambertBowden56]

​@@trustyWeedGuy There is no "what if" here... it's just nonsense. End of story.

[@trustyWeedGuy]

@@LambertBowden56 check out his drone challenge and tell me it's still bullshit xdd Only 4 engineers in the world solved it. You have a 2 hours podcast in his channel with the dudes showing their Lynchpin drones, capable of tangential flight. Terrence Howard Project

[@michaelmiller4938]

This is the most intelligent failure of grade school math ever espoused.

[@arctyler2245]

Please do tell

[@magnumopus8202]

1×1=1 because this question is asking you to give me 1 one time. Think about it this way. 6x4= 24 This question asked you to give me 6 four times 6,6,6,6 =24 Now 4×6 = 24 This question asked you to give me 4 six time 4,4,4,4,4,4,=24 Multiplication is really not adding but you can add to understand getting the answer. If that's doesn't help Why would you give me 1 thing two times when I only asked you to give it to me once. 1x1=1 1×1= 1 Either way I'm asking for a 1 one time don't give me 2.

[@KFrost-cz7uh]

9:57 now I’m curious at this part not about what the interview or follow up with… I want to know what the first page script said verbatim.

[@shmirie666]

So if 1x1=2 than 1÷1=0. So any number multiplied by 1 is not multiplication but addition. And dividing by 1 is subtraction.

[@iulia1690]

1x1=1square. 1:1=1at power 0. The first îs a plane, the second a point

[@brandonharrington6027]

New math Square root 2 = 1.4142135623 1.4142135623 X to the third 3rd Power = 2.28427121746190 Now divided by 2 Hit Equal now Cube it again hit x to the 3 yeah Do You See that Loop? Yeah that's saying X Cub is equal to 2x which is equal to x + x that's an Unnatural Equation that's a Mathematical Fallacy that's the "beginning of your math" that's how I invented tangential flight.

[@spicy1768]

when a number is "to the second power" it is multiplied by itself. It is NOT multiplied by 2. So he is wrong, it is not "2x", that is entirely a different math problem, and he simply doesn't understand what exponents are. It is extremely basic, and clearly wrong to anyone who understands the concept.

[@ayeshasalam4139]

Terrance Howard for President!!

[@mylilpc]

“1” isn’t an action. The equation 1x1 is a statement. One, one time, is one. Numbers are constructs nothing is actually being done to “one” when you multiply it so laws of physics don’t apply. You can’t hold a “one”, you can’t do what “one” does. Even as A person, you are more than one thing. Mathematical loops actually help to rationalize our existence considering we are bound to time space and matter. God exists outside of time space and matter, so I’m nearly positive a different kind of something like math exists somewhere outside of our realm of understanding. Each day anyone has ever lived in the conscious world of our known reality has been a loop of eating sleeping going to the bathroom being awake days and nights etc. The math loops because we are in a loop, in a program, in a system, God’s creation is a finite thing. It’s rather alarming to see people going to such great lengths to be confused or cause confusion these days 🤦🏽‍♀️

[@rubenledesma5116]

They've coded our mind to only Remember and Repeat...if you wish to break free, you'll need to exit their code. Mr. Howard is speaking an ancient language.

[@Anchor-Supreme]

It’s actually incredible how many people don’t understand how multiplication works. I’m genuinely terrified about the future of the Western world if this many people can be fooled by an obviously crazy individual.

[@officialkiii]

Extremely terrifying, the fact that we’re even discussing it 🥴

[@F1083]

Just wait until the flat earthers and the Terrance cult hook up

[@TheEngineeringHub]

Bro finds people who can't do math and gives them an 8th grade math trick which has nothing strange about it and claims he cracked the universe. Jeeeez😂

[@Timisme1926]

The story about Hotel Chateau Mon Mon, is such a Cold pimping life!! Trick that was just, absolutely the funniest story I’ve ever heard!!

[@volumerecords3945]

Never thought Howard would be blowing my mind on some math ish🤯🤯

[@erdtree_larry]

So if I go 1mph for 1 hr(1mi/hr x 1hr), how far have I gone? 1 x 1 = 1 AND (mi/hr) x (hr) = miles. So if you go 1 mi/hr for 1 hr, you have gone a distance of 1 mile in that time. If you turn on your faucet and put a pitcher underneath and it's flowing 1 L/min of water for 1 min, you will have a volume of 1L in that pitcher. L/min × min = L.

[@Or_else_it_gets_the_hose_again]

@@OrganicReasoningIt’s incredible how you’ve taken simple math that a child can understand and turned it into word salad that a grownup would lose their mind trying to apply logic to. It’s as if you’ve decided that because you can’t pronounce the letter $, red is actually potato and it definitely smells like 4.

[@Or_else_it_gets_the_hose_again]

@@OrganicReasoning Sorry, I made a typo. Read what I said again. You might want to retract your "like" unless you are trolling for responses like mine.

[@Or_else_it_gets_the_hose_again]

@OrganicReasoning then carry on the good work sir

[@soundmedicine1210]

Yeah I think Terrence means this. With your 1mph per hour comparison inded you have driven 1 hour x 1 mile = 1 mile. But the 1 hour you used is also energy and still exists even though you only look at the mile. But 1 mile and 1 hour stay seperate and dont add up to 2 miles.

[@erdtree_larry]

@@soundmedicine1210 We're not only considering one side. We're taking into account both of the items, it's just that they cancel out. This is called Dimensional Analysis, and it's how we get proper units. In this case it is (mile/hour) x (hour) = (mile x hour)/(hour) = (mile)...so the hours just cancel out, but it's important to realize that they are not ignored. It's similar to multiplying 2/3 x 3 = 2. Each item is considered, including with words(units), and that is also the case if you were to square them. For example (Pressure in psi or Lbs/in^2) = (Force)/(Area) = (Force in lbs)/(Area in square inches or in^2). We can rearrange this to find (Force) = (Pressure) x (Area) = (lbs/in^2) x (in^2) = lbs. Check out Dimensional Analysis...it's actually pretty cool, and it gets you thinking about all of the units you've ever seen and what they actually mean. Cheers!

[@hebrewloc9416]

His explanation about going to the theater to meet people not just to watch movies but to interact and socialize with you surrounding community is so true, I was explaining to a friend the other day on of the biggest reasons this Country and the World too in a smaller sense is becoming so Me, Me, Me, I, I, I, like, we you see small little groups of people stay to them selves, and why communities aren't really a community anymore, why there's more violence, more homelessness, more crime, and what I told him was, what first started this downward trend in societies breakdown started in the late 80's and early 90's with the dumbing down of our entire education system, we had a large amount of worthless non helpful, non educating and not caring teachers throughout America, a lot of them weren't teaching to educate the youth they were mearly earning a paychecks, many blamed the students instead of stepping up and actually teaching, the Highschool drop out rate was the highest it has ever been back then, instead of firing the worthless teachers and hiring ones that cared and wanted to really teach the government allowed the schools to adopt new educational programs, they also allowed the programs to dump the College prep courses and replace it with essentially dumb down the courses, the thought was to make it easier to learn and so the graduation rates would go up, the government also allowed non educational institutions to create the programs, all that really happened is they dumbed down society, sure the rates went up but now Americas students aren't prepared enough for college, as these stupid kids become adults they realized they were to dumb to really deal with this like society, the community, politics, so the started changing the society idea the community idea, as this went on you had to developers of property wanting more and more money, cities wanted older neighborhoods to look new again, so in came Gentrification, which is the single biggest killer of our local communities today, back in the day in 80's and 90's I lived in L.A., and gangsters, thugs, taggers etc.... were never scared of being arrested or cops, but we were scared of Miss Lavann in our apts, Ms Johnson on the corner, Mrs Cindy across the street, and that because we were scared of our moms and those ladies had mom on speed dial, people used to go to their local area fairs for their communities, local businesses would have booths, and im sure you've noticed a lot of them have gone away, things like here in the Sacramento area there used to be the Orangevale Pow Wow Days, Fair Oaks Fiesta Days, Citrus Heights American Life festival, etc... communities put these on so the community could come out and meet each other and also so the surrounding communities could come out and meet each other, that's why the these kind of Fairs always had booths from local community businesses to show off and showcase their businesses, it was a come meet your neighbors, have fun, bring your kids thing, these gradually linked and created City Fairs, County Fairs, State Fairs and eventually Country Expo's now not many people go to their local Fairs anymore, nor their County Fairs, and those that do only go for the Carnival rides and games and sometimes the music, gentrification has removed those old ladies neighborhood watch all stars, the tore down the homes and built huge gated communities of people who don't care about the areas they live in, they don't keep a watchful eye, they dont go to local community fairs, most dont even hang around their own communities even, they leave and go hang with friends at their homes, they dont go to to the movie theaters and watch movies they have watch parties at their homes, the idea of the community being a community looking out for the community and being involved in the community in the most sense is gone, communities simply aren't communities anymore, they're just neighborhoods and areas

[@thirtythreeeyes8624]

You just wrote a whole biography about how people are too self centered lol you can see the irony right?

[@Bxnjamin]

i like to think in new ways especially when trying to understand reality, and as mad as this all sounds it has made me think. (dont read this high) When thinking of multiplication as grouping, I'm aware that the equation of 1 apple multiplied by 1 is 1(1(apple)) , which in reality is not actually just 1 apple.. In this case the apple is a subject (of which there is 1) and the other 1 is a mathematical concept just as much as 0 and infinity.. it is separate to the 1 apple, or subject. So now when contrarily thinking about 1 apple multiplied by 1 apple - not 1 group of 1 apple - i can imagine how these two circumstances are completely separate cases in terms of reality/energy. increasing 1 apple by 1 apple shouldn't essentially remove the energy of either apple, and this is different to having 1 set of 1 apple. Our actual concept of 1 multiplied by itself and not an external subject should then also create a greater version of itself. Visually, 2 of something expanding by 2 of themselves would appear as 4 of those things together, 3 by 3 would appear as 9, and 1 expanding by 1 would appear as 2 (like if my iphone increased by one of itself it would look like a malformed double iphone). If so could the true 0 multiplied by the true 0 possibly equal 1, or in less mathematical terms "something"? Especially as its apparent that our concept of 0 is equally as small and large as infinity. What does this kind of unimaginable reaction cause outside of our comprehension? I believe that mathematics is our minds true language, and terminology can cause a lot of confusion. I think there's a fundamental difference between thinking of multiplication as creating baskets/groups, and thinking of multiplication as accumulation - or increasing - of the self/subject. There are things science/religion may never be able to explain - like how in our reality at some point something had to come from nothing - So i'm open to exploring possibilities and new ways of thinking like this that could help to explain these unknowns in our understanding. Thanks for reading my ted talks, I could be crazy or a genius.

[@Jus_Saiyan]

The point is, the math we have works but it's incomplete. Mathematics is not congruent with the laws of motion and relativity. Creative minds have been debating for centuries to unite these three disciplines. The fact we can't interstellar travel is based on our understanding of the universe and mathematical principles of space travel. This will require precision that we don't have currently with the system.

[@anthonyricciardo]

Unfortunately Terrence's thought process and logic is flawed here. Its simply a mistake in the mathematical concept of multiplication. I have provided a full proof and explanation above in the comments. The mathematics is complete, as it is based in simple arithmetic.

[@Player-gx1eo]

There is no point here. His thought process and basic knowedge is just wrong

[@Madonnalitta1]

Maths isn't supposed to. Numbers are a human creation. They are not a law of physics.

[@stacyjens8256]

I would love to watch a Terrence Howard show full of educational content.

[@creativekaii]

I'd love this as well!

[@anthonyricciardo]

You mean a show full of misconceptions and mistakes of concepts? Yeah, that would be entertaining. Would give me enough content to start my own KZbin channel dedicated to explaining in simple terms where the mistake is.

[@yancynunez5387]

😂😂 😂😂 people are so dumb.. so you think Einstein didn't think of why 1x1= 1 its an easy explanation. the man memorized 2 numbers in a calculator and he a genius .. let me see him do math.. with out a calculator. always talking about the same dam thing. the fact that yall dont know how 1x1=1 The reason the number stays the same is because multiplying by 1 means we have 1 copy of the number. mtf confusing adding and multiplying 😂😂 still cant wrap his head around of why having one copy of a number equals that number .. ahhhh maybe cuse you have a copy of one number bro 😂

[@Duna181]

Is any one how i can contact him , or try call and talk for few minuts? I think i know what he is missing in his approch.

[@317cmrogers]

I legit just want to sit and talk with him for like 10min. Pretty sure we can clear all this up

[@spicy1768]

There are a shocking number of people commenting on this video who do not understand multiplication. For those of you who genuinely think he is right, I have news for you. Both you and he do not understand how multiplication problems work. Let me explain it. If you have 2 x 3 = 6, this can be said as "two groups of three is six". So you have three in one group, and three in another group. That is six total. That is how you read a multiplication problem in simplest terms. So, for 1 x 1 = 1, one "group" of one, is ONE. Similarly, 0 x 2 = 0 because you have ZERO groups of two. If you have one group of any number, then you just have THAT NUMBER. If you have ZERO groups of any number, you have ZERO. You are fresh out of that number. Nada. Zilch. You got nothing. Someone should have taken this man aside and taken the time to TEACH him how to understand a multiplication problem. It is tragic that he has paraded his theory out to the world and even presented it to students at Oxford, and they sat there and let him explain the whole theory to them. We are destined to failure as human beings if Oxford tolerates an entire presentation by this man, a man who has failed to comprehend 3rd grade math, while having a disturbingly disproportionate amount of confidence in his incorrect beliefs. Please, for the love of God, everyone just think about what I have said, and if you are struggling with multiplication problems, contact an elementary teacher for help.

[@bsdiceman]

facts, if I was at that union speech, I would like to think I would have called him out.

[@stephenjones7129]

LOL I agree whole heartly. :)

[@anthonyricciardo]

Yes... take a look at my comment above. It provides a full explanation as to where the mistake is.

[@sunflowertarot393]

When have you ever seen Nothing in the universe?

[@billjohnson7706]

Exactly!!!