What's new in JavaScript - HTTP203

[@dandan7884]

itd be a great april 1st joke if google announced that chrome will support vbscript and is working together with microsoft to achieve this in the next months xd

[@vinno97]

Shanene Larissa only if they actually implemented it (behind a flag)

[@rongsenng]

What is the plus thingy Jake mentioned? Something like +'1' === 1?

[@dolphin7961]

What is a good name for that "not global" module scope that was mentioned at 3:40. I understand the idea, its scoped to the module/file and not on the window/global, but what do we call that scope? "Not-global" doesnt seem very clear

[@nofacee94]

module scope?

[@MattiasBuelens]

"Module scope" seems to be the most common term for it. This is similar to how we use the terms "global scope", "function scope" and "block scope". See also: hacks.mozilla.org/2018/03/es-modules-a-cartoon-deep-dive/

[@jakearchibald]

Problem is, and have different module scopes.

[@dolphin7961]

So what do we call those different module scopes? For longevity, I think type=module is the more appropriate case to be called "module scope". But the "Lexical scope" that scripts have is also important to differentiate

[@jakearchibald]

I guess "module script lexical scope" and "classic script lexical scope". Hmm.

[@entalpa]

When will NodeJS run modules asynchronous instead of synchronous. Now I have to write extra code to accomplish this.

[@nunofaria11]

That comment from Mathias about re-implementing "+" with "-" is both brilliant and terrifying... cause they are actually capable of doing it when they want to start the apocalypse

[@izybit]

Apple did something similar(ly stupid) with ++/-- in Swift.

[@sewaksingh6189]

Http 203 ?

[@ganstabreakincity]

So cool, Mathias always look like he knows every detail XDD

[@hamzaelouakili2438]

Mathias is crazy hyped!!! :P

[@sonicpawnsyou]

Message to whoever is writing the subtitles for these videos: At 03:38, it should be "class declarations", not "classic iterations".

[@entalpa]

These guys are very smart. Einstein told me once that fantasy is more important than knowledge.

[@imorganmarshall]

This was enjoyable, thanks.

[@whosmav628]

Hard to follow this

[@avilde]

That's a great upcoming feature - private prop :)

[@iuliuvisovan7307]

Holy shit fourteen nights Surma no wonder you're at Google

[@Vladhin]

Private fields?? Wow

[@hrgwea]

Why would any browser vendor other than Microsoft ever support VBScript? Not even worth joking about it. :P

[@easy-stuffs]

Tamizhan da!! :-)

[@AtileonVA]

Privates props in classes... I will start to cry of joy

[@AtileonVA]

Fransisco Wijaya 4:21 dude

[@AtileonVA]

I don't think so, there's great features that Typescript has and Js dont... honestly my knowledge about TS is less than JS, I'm exploring these days

[@erfling1]

Fransisco Wijaya If JavaScript becomes typescript, then, yeah, there will be no need for Typescript

[@LarsRyeJeppesen]

@Fransisco Wijaya Last time I checked, JS didn't have typing

[@Textras]

I SECOND that you're first

[@Nonenone-rj9yp]

lol you refer to your manager like their a wife or something

[@andrew1550]

gibs me da ::bind, I don't care about the pipeline operator, ramda is a much better solution for composing functions.

[@carloschulo]

LOL ReDim -ing arrays

[@garfieldgray]

first

[@dragannovakovic9816]

No love for pipeline operator? :(

[@dassurma]

Pipeline operator is still contentious. We had a dedicated video on it.

[@davidmaxwaterman]

private - yuck