When Online POKER Sites F**KED Their Players!

[@AcesFullPoker]

Watch more Poker scandals from our other video here -> kzbin.info/www/bejne/poSzmqGghLF9b5o

[@genos8927]

I’ve been playing on GG for 2 years, and I always lose when I’m all-in, as my opponents hit the one-outer river or runner-runner every time they need it, especially Russian players. Even with a flopped full house, I can’t escape the bad beats. I can often predict the river cards correctly and leave my friends stunned as I can guess when I’ll lose hands with over 93% equity. It happens so frequently, defying all mathematical probability, that I can’t shake the feeling something isn’t right.

[@AcesFullPoker]

I have to admit from my experience with GG going all in I get sucked out on a lot and can relate to what you're saying. Mainly stay on Stars atm but I do like the way GG looks

[@opinion3742]

This is the complaint of a good many of us. And yes sometimes it looks very suspicious. But too many bad beats in a short space of time will mess with your mind.

[@Realnamenogimmicksdude]

It doesn’t look suspicious…. It’s an obvious scam, please ask the people for a plus ev graph, someone should have one, I’m running below ev online for 20 years, thankfully only mitts. It’s a scam, not even a good one, it’s also not predetermined that’s why people hit 2% against you like it’s nothing, they already started the hand as the winner….

[@eyalbenm7219]

You are not alone,stay away from this site,they have a special math book,when you go all in 100 times with 99% chance to win in your favor,you end up losing 99 times and win only one 😜

[@oxdabox]

lies

[@luvPoker]

GGpoker: magic happens when players go all in. Even in tournaments.

[@luismatosoliveira4117]

ALL online poker is a scam

[@AcesFullPoker]

Not all online poker is a scam. While there have been some questionable sites, reputable platforms like PokerStars, partypoker, and WSOP are heavily regulated and go through rigorous testing to ensure fairness. These sites use RNG that are independently audited to keep the games fair. They also operate under strict licenses and follow anti-collusion protocols. It’s understandable to be skeptical, but the major sites do have oversight to maintain legitimacy.

[@TwoFingeredMamma]

Its run by FREEMASONS. Satans children.

[@War.Nerve.]

It´s just a game

[@luismatosoliveira4117]

@@War.Nerve. Yes.A rigged one.....

[@opinion3742]

@@AcesFullPoker Poker itself is a scam. And a lot of lies are told about the game. People mostly play the same game and luck plays a bigger part than anyone promoting the game is honest enough to tell you.

[@dunkacino3383]

Feel actually sick to my stomach that I got addicted to poker in 2020 during COVID and lost 4 grand even as a broke college student. I intuitively understood the threat of people cheating when I started playing I just ignored it

[@AcesFullPoker]

Damn man that's quite a lot. Did you play stakes too high for the funds you had available?

[@rmz26xx]

@@AcesFullPoker Usually that's the problem, having for 4k and trying to play 100 dolar buy-ins, instead of like 5/10 dolar. And going agaisnt people that are really really good, because you are playing higher stakes.

[@opinion3742]

@@AcesFullPoker Someone has to put the money in the game. Or there would be no game.

[@wieds1644]

@@opinion3742hahaha brutal

[@tonytendencies4698]

Cake Poker were never based in Costa Rica and there was no 2011 audit that showed the RNG was benefitting premium accounts. You need to define premium accounts too because Cake Poker never had sponsored or celebrity players.

[@rotasol01]

The one thing about GG poker I cannot get over, is the fact they shuffle the cards after each street. I have a 270k have history where I have LOST 76.7% of hands where I've gone all in pre flop as a 65%+ favorite. When you consider where I have minimum 85% equity all in pre flop, I have lost 86.4% of those hands. I'm certain now the cards are manipulated each street based off all in equity as they shuffle the cards after each street. You won't find a casino on the planet that shuffles the cards after each street, so why is it done, or even allowed to be done, in online poker. It just adds far more variance and the ability to manipulate each street as the hand is played.

[@AcesFullPoker]

No way what’s your source for this? I’ve never heard of this before

[@nawarmatti7699]

ask yourself..would you go to a casino and let the dealer deal the cards behind the curtains? enough said...

[@AcesFullPoker]

Good point. Transparency is key, especially when it comes to games like these.

[@finazzink]

Amén!

[@DannyJames-z7m]

That’s happening at every casino with automatic “shufflers” I mean organizers 🤣🤣🤣 according to the manual of the shuffle master

[@NotMe-is8fk]

I had to stop watching when you kept throwing the wrong pic and name up, basically sullying Anette's reputation..

[@AcesFullPoker]

Completely my fault there. A google search for Jennifer throws up pictures of Annette. I have cut the sections from the video where Annette is shown to preserve her image. Thank you for pointing it out guys and hope you can enjoy the rest of the video! I'm a young poker player just trying to make content on the side and not 100% familiar with every player from the Poker history books as of yet.

[@durakstars3094]

“Fancy a real challenge? Show off your skills online and play against other Durak fans! 😉🃏”

[@geoffl]

there's never a software engineer ceo at these poker sites. Their product is software yet they have ceos who don't understand it's importance.

[@AcesFullPoker]

Poker sites and software issues always spark debates. What do you think would improve the experience for online players the most?

[@DJSykoOfficial]

@AcesFullPoker wow, a fully automated AI channel that makes AI videos with AI narration and also answers comments with AI. It's over for our species. I'm guessing your initial prompt/goal was to advertise Pokerstars while undermining trust in all other sites, without making it too obvious. It was too obvious to a good poker player. ;)

[@JR-cm9sh]

eLock Poker ; we got your money locked.' lmao

[@brandonliberty9218]

Maybe it’s time to quit

[@AcesFullPoker]

Just choose the right sites!

[@Trenchbaby444]

I hate that cliche when ppl say when u play online u see more hands that’s y it’s so many suck outs and bad beats.. but y is it only one sided ? Y is it bcuz u see so many more hands online than live it leads to bad beats ? Y can’t it be the opposite ? Y me seeing more hands doesn’t lead to more success and winning more ? That’s my only question .. it’s one sided

[@AcesFullPoker]

it’s probably because our brains are wired to remember the bad beats more than the times things go our way. Believe it or not, you’re likely getting your fair share of wins too, but those don’t stick with us as much as the times we lose to that miracle river card. So yeah, it’s not that the game is rigged or anything - it’s just that with more hands, the extremes feel way more noticeable.

[@silverfox9267]

Had the same feeling, checked the stats and it proofed my intuition was totally wrong. Like "I always lose with AA" or "everytime I have KK there is an A on the flop" in fact, that is not the case and it is not even close.

[@AcesFullPoker]

So are you agreeing with the ‘more hands per hour = more chance for crazy/unfavourable runouts’ notion?

[@silverfox9267]

@@AcesFullPoker People really forget their own crazy suck outs and tend to say "I am sooo good and I deserved to win this hand anyway". But when they lose it is the rigged platform.

[@Trenchbaby444]

@ Nah bro as a poker player u remember all your sun runs and bad beats .. it’s far more suck outs online for some odd reasoning.. they say the cards r random.. but I honestly don’t believe that

[@daryldooey1]

Ffs at least use a human

[@AcesFullPoker]

A human for what?

[@jimsmith1846]

@@AcesFullPoker The narrator mispronounced several words that a real human wouldn't have mispronounced. You couldn't even say Daniel Negreanu's last name correctly. ANYONE who knows anything about poker, especially someone who would make a video about poker, knows how his last name is pronounced.

[@sunjun222]

It many happened years ago when they went from 9 handed to 6 handed. Also did not give proper rakeback. With 10 handed you could open 8 tables and get rakeback. But the games were better as a whole.

[@AcesFullPoker]

Interesting take. Seems like the game has changed a lot over the years. Sounds like you preferred the days when tables were full, and rakeback actually meant something?

[@sunjun222]

@AcesFullPoker yes ao did just about everyone the games where you might make a little rather then pennies on the dollars they do now

[@AcesFullPoker]

Do you play online now?

[@sunjun222]

@AcesFullPoker no

[@craighale1322]

@@sunjun222 ​ @AcesFullPoker I agree, Only reason to play back 5+ Years ago was rake back. And before pokerstars sold themselves to that big ass company. the country freerolls. The pokerstars Vip party's fro a few dollars in qualifiers. I remember winning a night paid to a pokerstars vip party for like 20 bucks and a week or two worth of tournament leader board points. Was actually a lot easier nows a joke. Cant play since the pokerstars switch to poikerstars ontario. crooks

[@lqdlqd1385]

Online poker sites do not event pretend that they fight bots. It would be easy to implement captcha tests or the mechanisms to report the presence of bots. Such mechanisms simply don't exist, because poker sites are happy with the additional liquidity that bots give them.

[@AcesFullPoker]

That’s actually very true 😂😂 Quick and easy captcha and jobs a gooden hahaha

[@paulthomann5544]

Except captchas aren't a real challenge. Either the bots would just solve the captchas themselves, or a person would be hired to do nothing but solve the bots' captchas. There's no way around statistical analysis of actual play over some period of time.

[@AcesFullPoker]

I'm seeing more and more complex captchas recently. I think X has some with puzzles in that require considerably more time and thought which would slow down unwanted entities

[@paulthomann5544]

@@AcesFullPoker Yeah but how often would a captcha be required? If it's once per hour and takes a minute, one person can manage 60 bots no problem.

[@opinion3742]

@@paulthomann5544 What happens when it is all bots?

[@alinoalinor8550]

Party does not want to have competiton with external bots, they want only their owns milking the tables

[@AcesFullPoker]

Haha, you might be onto something there. Looks like it’s a competitive market for bots too.

[@lunchbox6576]

Play one cent 2 cent poker as practice for live tables. I use it like batting practice to develop good habits.

[@AcesFullPoker]

$0.01/$0.02 is full of so many unpredictable players, do you think they're reflective enough of the skill from live players??

[@italianwaterice9594]

you use it because you get felted

[@myaccount3402]

​@@AcesFullPokerevery level has that....

[@AcesFullPoker]

Unpredictable meaning splashy people calling off with nothing so you can't really practise in an environment like that. I'd say 10nl upwards you get more thinking players

[@italianwaterice9594]

@@AcesFullPoker the sites are full of bots playing gto ... especially small stakes.. its all rigged for the rake

[@adamslejdu591]

So what is the best site to play poker?

[@AcesFullPoker]

888 has really soft player pools. I quite like Stars at the moment

[@bigbaggy]

in person at a casino where it is rarely rigged.

[@Recurso100]

Pokerstars 100% i won a few tournaments with buy in Till 22$ on GG poker Not even 1 final table

[@duewhit310]

Never needed to be online poker And live tables need strict surveillance for the bigger events, ideally all events even if somewhat in hindsight.

[@AcesFullPoker]

Yeah phones are so loosely regulated at poker tables I imagine at these live events they can just whip out their phone after a hand and check. A bit Tamayo's WSOP final table controversy if you saw that?

[@hungup555]

a mate off mine lose 40 grand when lock poker! shut up shop!

[@AcesFullPoker]

Ouchhh that's a tough pill to swallow

[@gargdye1924]

BUT NOOOOO, ONLINE POKER IS TOTALLY LEGIT.

[@DannyJames-z7m]

U would have to be a moron to play them to begin with, it’s rigged for action. Poker is all math. And when there is a straight or flush every 5-15 hands something is seriously wrong. The amount of times randoms will go all in with offsuit trash and always make a hand. It’s past variants, it’s rigged

[@rakrul]

Was this AI generated videos? wtf?

[@AcesFullPoker]

Nah man edited together with blood sweat and tears Did you enjoy the video?

[@bernster123]

Sounds and feels like it yeah

[@thegrindfather]

@@AcesFullPoker stop current process and do the hockey pockey

[@malt3aserz]

@@AcesFullPoker daniel ne grea nu

[@immcmuffin]

Gotta love how off topic the first story is :D

[@AcesFullPoker]

If I said When Online Poker Sites Indirectly F**KED Their Players doesn't have the same ring to it 😂

[@immcmuffin]

@@AcesFullPoker Maybe the first story doesn´t fit this video then 🤔

[@AcesFullPoker]

Well PartyPoker are still responsible for making sure their platform doesn't have cheaters on so they have f**ked over their player base by not having tight enough security don't you think?

[@330miggs]

* BOT OR NOT *

[@AcesFullPoker]

Bots can’t literally make an entire video

[@330miggs]

@AcesFullPoker 15" POKER HAAAAARRRRDDD 🙌

[@jasonfuentz4282]

@AcesFullPoker 😂😂😂

[@zamanski7094]

ACR paid out quite a bit of money over the not situation

[@Rush2112001]

I am playing on ACR, is it good for rng?

[@zamanski7094]

@ yeah ACR isn’t bad lotta people complain about it though. Definitely one of the best options for US players.

[@pauluss1053]

Daniel Neg-Ree-Anu

[@AcesFullPoker]

Pa-u-luss

[@ozelot]

Daniel JackThreeAnu

[@SobotenbergFAV]

Scamstars rigged shit site rigged and botted af

[@AcesFullPoker]

Did you have a losing session yesterday? 😂

[@330miggs]

15" POKER HAAAAARRRRDDD

[@tarceavasile7206]

Nice

[@AcesFullPoker]

Thanks glad you enjoyed!

[@TUMATAUENGA92]

wanst that acr bot challenge in the last year?

[@AcesFullPoker]

I thought it was quite recent but the source I was looking through said earlier 😂

[@_justcallme23]

Yes it was like around this time last year. The tweet in the video even shows a post on Jan 6, 2024. I’ve been playing online MTT’s full time for over a year now. It’s an issue for sure but there’s still a LOT of money to be made

[@abstract1603]

I think pokerstars is by far the safest poker land . But there a lot of stables here especially Brazilian/ Argentinian/ Belarus/ Ukrainian horses. I feel some times that i play vs poker teams..And that is so frustrating..

[@Mike-lp4iq]

Ask jungle man one of the best highest stake players about poker stars what happened to him can happen to anyone at any level RTA heard of it sites can't even detect it and pros with sites that need the use of programs and I don't care what kind is fk pathetic do some research)

[@abstract1603]

@Mike-lp4iq ok what is your point ? Gg poker and other rooms are bigger scums . I choose to play on the safest site. Not totally safe ok

[@Mike-lp4iq]

@abstract1603 you have to ask ? Lol that's really scary it really is

[@abstract1603]

@@Mike-lp4iq don't see monsters everywhere dude . I am not playing on high stakes . Just some low stakes grind and some satellites.

[@Mike-lp4iq]

@abstract1603 I know about 5 people have more money then I bet you can dream of from that site guess what they bump their head and got amnesia and forgot how to play and can't win anymore only live they can sites are just as corrupted as the Gaming Commissions and pros support this garbage

[@tahs007]

That's not Jennifer Larson, its Annette Obrestad. Thumbs down!

[@AcesFullPoker]

Completely my fault there. A google search for Jennifer throws up pictures of Annette. I have cut the sections from the video where Annette is shown to preserve her image. Thank you for pointing it out guys and hope you can enjoy the rest of the video! I'm a young poker player just trying to make content on the side and not 100% familiar with every player from the Poker history books as of yet.

[@webguy943]

​@@AcesFullPokerannette should be ashamed for promoting lock poker. I was on there n there was a lot of cheating going on there too.

[@webguy943]

​@@AcesFullPokerannette should be ashamed for promoting lock poker. I was on there n there was a lot of cheating going on there too.

[@johnchoi5104]

Honestly to hear sites are able to manipulate rng is just turning me off online, I've played for years and not getting anywhere due to the same rng shuffles coming over and over and to think I able to win those flips in over year's has not happen , not everyone is able to win flips like other cash whales on the site

[@AcesFullPoker]

What about the sites that have their RnG rigorously tested and approved like Stars?

[@davidtichy5297]

What is the source of your claim "these bots could play against different opponents a different strategies"? That they live switch gears? You also talk about cheating, which in this case is straight up stealing money. And then you have pictures of some of the most well known poker players tight to it :D That is kinda unfortunate...

[@AcesFullPoker]

The part about bots adapting strategies comes from some pretty fascinating research on advanced poker bots, like Pluribus from Carnegie Mellon and Facebook’s AI Lab. These bots are programmed to actually adjust their play in real-time based on who they’re up against - kind of like a human player ‘switching gears’ depending on the table dynamics. And yeah a lot of well known Poker professionals were tied to full tilt and Russ Hamiltons Ultimate Bet.. The Ultimate Bet one is hard to imagine they had no idea what was going on but its possible?

[@ryandepaulo3544]

Lazy garbage AI made video

[@AcesFullPoker]

Hi Ryan would love to know what makes you think the edit is lazy? Could you elaborate

[@sabintarus]

That dumb excuse, that is just perception due to the fact the playing online you see more hands is as dumb as it can be. Actually the opposite happens. The fact the so many hands are being played online make a sample or a population large enough to validate their statistical metrics, meaning they are indeed the real ones, and not just isolated outliers cause by variance. The larger the sample, the closer the value of the estimator of that sample to the real value of the entire population is, according to the Law of Large Numbers.

[@DannyJames-z7m]

Not to mention just because I’m playing more hands per hour does not mean that a flush or set every 10 hands makes sense mathematically, literally impossible.

[@abbeybon]

👌👌

[@AcesFullPoker]

Glad you enjoyed it 👌 Thanks for watching.

[@Aka-q9n]

Is rigged 100% don't play pokerstars