Tarantino: "First off, Oliver cut over 28 minutes of Juliette's feet. I wanted nothing to do with it after that."
@maxstraight82402 ай бұрын
Feet jokes aren't funny
@0t3n4layf2 ай бұрын
@@maxstraight8240This comment actually made me laugh 😂
@simonfrederiksen1042 ай бұрын
@@maxstraight8240 Yes feet jokes are the bottom of apparel!
@philmcmahon7415Ай бұрын
werd
@chadalpha798323 күн бұрын
Stone also took out 750 N-words spoken by the characters
@azzah7712 ай бұрын
With the difficulty Tarantino had getting started it makes you wonder how many other amazing directors are out there who never get the chance
@Eventual-Visitor2 ай бұрын
Many who weren't willing to live with their nose all up in the right rectums.
@goracks692 ай бұрын
Agreed. What’s more is this probably isn’t just a director specific thing. Any profession with a high buy-in will be like this. How many potentially amazing CEO’s are managing mcDonalds? How many Bruce Lee’s aren’t on camera? How many Michael Schumacher’s are driving Honda Civics to their 9-5s? How many gifted artists go unknown? If only talent was the measuring factor instead of luck and money.
@crow5782 ай бұрын
There's all kinds of wasted talent. I created a technology worth billions of dollars, and I'll likely die homeless.
@Publiksquare2 ай бұрын
Most of them
@crow578Ай бұрын
@@unknown5150variable Swarm/cellular/modular robotics in general, and the modular lawnmower in particular. It renders everything else on the market (a $31b/yr industry) obsolete. I also created the Barnacle Bot,the world's first remote-controlled marine hull-cleaning robot.
@raixhatv66663 ай бұрын
*No feet shots* Tarantino: it's ruined
@mikes80203 ай бұрын
There's a feet shot from the movie in this video.
@ArtLike3 ай бұрын
4:34 we see…FEET 😊
@Kasigi033 ай бұрын
Ummm Juliette Lewis definitely put out a butt with her bare feet in this movie for sure. And she hangs her bare feet out the car a few times. You also get a squat shot for the real freaks.
@Seth979933 ай бұрын
That must be it😂
@karsten115533 ай бұрын
Hahaha I just paused it randomly at 4:34 to check out a couple of the comments, and the first one I see is this comment:D (Spoiler: we see feet at 4:34)
@VonWenk8 күн бұрын
"Mallory's backstory as sitcom" is my favorite part of Natural Born Killers. Tarrantino should be happy his script got made.
@girtisholland3 ай бұрын
Why does Roger Avery never get credit from the public for being involved in writing Pulp Fiction, Reservoir Dogs and True Romance.
@phoebevolz22913 ай бұрын
I feel like Avery helped trim a lot of the fat from Tarantino’s earlier scripts and helped them become better movies. Those films all have his recognizable style, the snappy dialogue, etc. but they’re also tighter than most of the stuff that he’s made since.
@freakbuck3 ай бұрын
You can watch Roger Avery's films and see for yourself how much he contributed to Tarantino's early work. Killing Zoe and The Rules of Attraction are both brilliant. It's criminal that he hasn't made a movie in 20+ years.
@getsome48063 ай бұрын
@@freakbuck"...criminal..." might be an unfortunate term to apply to his career.
@johncorr71543 ай бұрын
He killed a woman due to his reckless decision to drive while intoxicated, so In my opinion he's better off being ignored and not glorified.
@NickNotar3 ай бұрын
@@johncorr7154Nobody is glorifying drunk driving, and he served his time and changed his life. He didn't murder someone. He made a mistake, a horrible mistake, and he has to live with it every day. You don't. Learn forgiveness, especially in regards to something that has zero bearing on you. You'll be much happier.
@thevelvetroom94493 ай бұрын
every youtube video these days: "before we get to the point of the video, lets start from the beginning....." every damn video
@sirsnek65623 ай бұрын
usually warranted but I've seen some misses Its important to do it so you aren't interrupting the main point to go on some tangent to explain why it matters, like someone explaining warhammer lore
@EyeballParalysisProd3 ай бұрын
it’s called a lack of writing talent and a reliant on clips
@AnneHathawayRules3 ай бұрын
As opposed to starting from the middle...
@Elcore3 ай бұрын
@@AnneHathawayRulesStarting from the middle is a legitimate and engaging storytelling technique though. In fact it's one of the oldest (Google 'in medias res').
@AnneHathawayRules3 ай бұрын
@@Elcore UGH. Not starting from the beginning and then having that pause... "Let me tell you how I got here..." 🤮 Such an overused cliché
@mikethetowns3 ай бұрын
Downey Jr; the one American actor in showbiz who's put in the effort to craft a damn decent and pretty convincing Strayan accent haha.
@Molkentin3 ай бұрын
Serious?
@mikomaxwell63133 ай бұрын
@@Molkentinit’s pretty good
@Molkentin3 ай бұрын
@@mikomaxwell6313 Are you australian? OP is which is weird.
@EndrChe3 ай бұрын
@@MolkentinAre you? Is it bad?
@paulw50393 ай бұрын
@@EndrChe I'm Australian. His accent is OK. Not great. Some words he nails, others don't sound right.
@ErebosGR3 ай бұрын
Oliver Stone: "It wasn't like we stole his script, he was paid very well." 3:28 "$10,000"...
@martianproductions9973 ай бұрын
lmao seriously 🤣 thats BS even in the 90s!
@latviandragon27183 ай бұрын
i mean thats alot of money
@roems63963 ай бұрын
There must have been something on the back end. He said he gave up money to take his name off the script, so there was more than that upfront payment.
@zym66873 ай бұрын
The 10,000 was to option the script not the full price.
@mellowyello14783 ай бұрын
@roems6396 possibly a guaranteed funding for what would become Reservoir Dogs
@keithwilliams883 ай бұрын
It was QT’s baby, so I understand why the deviation annoyed him so much. But from the outside, the things Stone brought to it were valuable and interesting. Just in a different tone from what QT laid out. He kept most of what was in the original script, and arguably by expanding and humanizing M&M, added a good dash of complexity to the flavor. Added stakes to tense scenes in the riot and escape that would be much much dimmer. Who cares if they make it out if all you know is the little shown in the interview and a few flashbacks? I’m glad fate lined up a collaboration that otherwise wouldn’t happen.
@jamesfayne1083 ай бұрын
The sitcom opening is what grabbed me right away. I can't even picture the movie without that scene
@MrSh4des3 ай бұрын
true. its iconic. better than any tarantino opening maybe he was just jealous.
@craighicksartwork2 ай бұрын
It's very deep and very dark. Not sure why Tarantino doesn't get it.
@grogery15702 ай бұрын
I can't think of a better way of saying that behind the perfect image of a family home resides a house of horrors.
@hubble90752 ай бұрын
First thing that grabbed me was the song choice.
@sullivandmitry14162 ай бұрын
@@craighicksartworkit’s not that he doesn’t “get it,” more that he doesn’t like it. He is a different director and felt like his story was ripped up and changed.
@bobcobb36543 ай бұрын
QT’s hate of the “I Love Mallory” sequence seems pretty simple; he didn’t think the co-protagonist needed an origin story. Much like how IMO Rob Zombie’s Halloween messed up by trying to explain why Michael Myers was like he was. Sometimes it’s more compelling when you don’t have an explanation.
@lanolinlight3 ай бұрын
You just articulated the crux of the problem with modern movies--filmmakers catering to plot/backstory nerds as if a truckload information can substitute for creating a genuine emotional connection or dramatic necessity. It's for people who wish to casually "think" through a movie rather than become immersed in it. NBK is their granddaddy.
@deanjustdean78183 ай бұрын
Problem with that is that Mallory's behaviour, if you want to sympathise with her, *does* require explanation. In the 1990s, the fact that nearly every woman on Earth has been subjected to unacceptable behaviour from the male animal was not widely known. So making it clear after the fact that Mallory was smashing the shit out of a country hick fukktard because he did things that remind her of her male gene pool shitter was important for audiences of that time. And it was just as important for the Scagnetti takedown. The more nuanced view we have today (one that Stone was clearly partly clued in on) was not developed enough. Did you know that over ninety percent of the men in jail were abused as boys? I am willing to bet it is a hundred percent with the women.
@brianstorm54883 ай бұрын
@@lanolinlightSee the shitty Alien prequels where explanation kills all plausibility and the horror of a mysterious species that might have ravaged entire planets and is the most populous in the universe for all we know. Knowing you’re dying with no idea why and no hint of motive is much scarier. Then again maybe Jaws should have a backstory where Quint killed it’s wife.
@bomboy73 ай бұрын
Go take a shower!
@AJ02233 ай бұрын
Hard disagree about Rob zombies Halloween dude, hard disagree
@domclegg12253 ай бұрын
does anyone else miss when film video essays had actual titles and thumbnails
@zerocore_3 ай бұрын
i miss the days when i was gullible enough to think video essayists were actual authorities on the subjects they covered.
@LordJagd3 ай бұрын
Yeah now it's all like "this filmmaker did something shocking and i can't get enough of it" (emphasis on lack of capitalization)
@billycostigan12473 ай бұрын
The tube is completely oversaturated. Too much content to give any thumbnail time to something that doesnt feature pop culture icons/drama. It's really crappy and lame.
@angryretrogamer73133 ай бұрын
I like the thumbnail and title to this video. I knew what the video was about the second I saw it.
@dooffff3 ай бұрын
I've never cared, but the AI shit gets on my nerves, just be thankful you're hearing a person
@daemonthorn58883 ай бұрын
I loved Natural Born Killers. It's a great film.
@MovieTrailerDatabase3 ай бұрын
Agreed. A proper fun movie with some really great stylistic choices.
@GoldKingsMan3 ай бұрын
Yea was a cool weird movie.
@TheLangalear2 ай бұрын
Top ten easily......Robert, Woody and Lewis were amazing, not to mention Mr. Dangerfield being a perfect casting for his part.
@shamoney9385Ай бұрын
Amazing movie
@sunflowerbadger3 күн бұрын
Movies can be so predictable and boring. Not this one. ❤
@JeffreyDeCristofaro3 ай бұрын
I just couldn't get Tommy Lee Jones and Robert Downey Jr.'s roles, dialogue and performances out of my head after I finished seeing it for the first time 1.5 decades ago. So over-the-top that they were perfect!
@Alexshriver20242 ай бұрын
Why not just say 15 years ago ?
@francoisleveille4092 ай бұрын
@@Alexshriver2024 Why tell someone else how to say what they want to say ?
@michaelslowmin2 ай бұрын
@@Alexshriver2024Why not say .015 millenia?
@biohead662 ай бұрын
@@michaelslowmin or 0.15 centuries
@ScreaminSaviorАй бұрын
My favorite Tommy Lee Jones role!
@ICantBeCompletlyCertain3 ай бұрын
The sit com part is incredible. It's such dark twisted absurd satire. Really brilliant ridicule of a deeply disturbed nation.
@WorldwideWyatt3 ай бұрын
Yep
@pete97153 ай бұрын
Much like the scene Jeffery hides in the closet in Blue Velvet.
@jenkharmilton3 ай бұрын
Best scene and far funnier than anything in any other Tarantino movie.
@brianmeen21583 ай бұрын
Yep. Dangerfield nailed his role
@SeanGabbert2 ай бұрын
Yup. The sitcom sequence put it on us with every laugh track. Good scene. Tarantino just didn’t like this vision, I guess. But for him to say it’s a bad movie? A bit much.
@francoisleveille4092 ай бұрын
NBK came out in 1994 - just one year after the documentary version of Manufacturing Consent - and both combined had such a profound impact on the way I see media and how it is used to influence people's values and opinions.
@tehf00n2 ай бұрын
I hear that brother. I actually emailed Noam Chomsky at his M.I.T. office after watching the MC doc. I asked "How do you avoid feeling impotent, when it comes to changing things, with all this knowledge you have acquired?" (along with some explanation of my own journey to political knowledge). To my surprise he replied a month later and basically said (to paraphrase) "it's important to do whatever it takes to look yourself in the mirror every day and say I've done something". That gave me a new hope that even my microchanges could affect change.
@francoisleveille4092 ай бұрын
@@tehf00n Unfortunately, these days, the magnificent legitimate criticism of our democratic societies Chomsky wrote 2-3 decades ago is used by dictatorships to legitimize believing in their propaganda and disinformation.
@KasumiRINA5 күн бұрын
@@tehf00n was there a gеnосіdе that Chomsky haven't supported openly? He even wrote a complimentary foreword for HоІосаust denial book! Dude is like "if you kill millions, I will white-wash you, and I got JUST the director that will make a complimentary interview", between Oliver Stone and Noam, I haven't seen a third person that wished me and my family and our entire country dead as hard as these two... except for poo tin himself.
@wrecklessfilmsofficial3 ай бұрын
Funny, because this is my favorite film. Love Tarantino and Stone. I find it interesting you came to a different conclusion because in reading the original screenplay, I was actually surprised how similar Quentin's was in its tone. Much of the media satire is still there, only Quentin focuses on overly long dialogue scenes with Wayne that aren't necessary and focuses less on Mickey and Malory which makes them a lot more stale than Stone's version--as goofy and romanticized as they are in his version.
@holdwhatdoor76293 ай бұрын
I agree with a lot of what you say. I also thought the sitcom style intro for Mallory was one of the best aspects of the movie because of its satirical depiction of reality with a veil of sitcom production style
@AllDetours3 ай бұрын
NBK is also a virtual blueprint for Kill Bill: needless shifts to black and white, tilting camera angles, anime sequence. Stone should have been given a Pulitzer for adding in a laugh track to the Dangerfield scene
@THEDONTTELLSHOW13 күн бұрын
tbf the black and white sections in Kill Bill were to get it an R rating.
@AllDetours13 күн бұрын
@THEDONTTELLSHOW but they are still there
@THEDONTTELLSHOW13 күн бұрын
@@AllDetours in the R rated version they are. There is an unrated version with both films together which has those scenes in full colour. I agree that NBK absolutely skewered QT though, prefiguring his next pop-culture addled moves with accuracy.
@AllDetours13 күн бұрын
@@THEDONTTELLSHOW cool!
@roems63963 ай бұрын
Nice retrospective! I have always wondered why he hated the movie so much. It was iconic to us teenagers in the 90s. This really explains the differences of focus between his original script and the final product.
@ConernicusRex3 ай бұрын
Only the ones who hadn’t matured into their teens yet.
@roems63963 ай бұрын
@@ConernicusRex What? You’re saying that children watched this movie and enjoyed it, not teenagers? Ridiculous take.
@VersusArduaКүн бұрын
@@roems6396 ikr? What a weird take 😂
@octagonseventynine12533 ай бұрын
I love that movie. Some of my favourite ever performances. It’s a funny, wacky, psychedelic, horrific road movie. It’s no Wild at Heart though. I don’t think Tarantino understands or at least cares about Satire and that movie is 100% satire.
@doofwarrior99123 ай бұрын
Nah 1000% a top 5 for me
@THEDONTTELLSHOW3 ай бұрын
It was a satire of Quentin's pop-addled-fevered-fetished mind. That's why he hates it.
@mikespearwood39143 ай бұрын
@@THEDONTTELLSHOW Yeah, Tarantino always wants the violence to be "cool". Which is why he'd despise a satirical take on violence and celebrity.
@dvdly3 ай бұрын
Interesting, your Wild at Heart comparison because I felt when I first saw NBK that much of the similarity between both film's imagery and tone had to've been done deliberately by Stone: on-the-run renegades road trip and their style of automobile; their scenes pulled over at the side of the two-lane highway; close-up of creepy insect on the hot asphalt and intermittent running yellow lines; the change in mood of the protagonists after a dramatic death along the way.
@gregruddock56623 ай бұрын
@@dvdly Damn Fine Analysis.
@BadQuest3 ай бұрын
A solid documentary, excellent editing. Very good stuff man!
@chadwik40003 ай бұрын
Do you know who Quentin Tarantino supposedly wrote this based on? It was a real life couple, allegedly.
@entropynmeАй бұрын
Thank you for talking about this movie. I first saw it a few years back and keep coming back and then away with new interpretations, and for whatever reason not a ton of people are talking about this film
@seankelly64613 ай бұрын
Natural born killers is an exceptional film by any measure...roger ebert called it a masterpiece....i kinda agree with him
@yournamehere60022 ай бұрын
The Mallory sitcom was actually a great idea
@magnuskallas2 ай бұрын
I agree. Strange to say, but I have 3 films in my favourites collection I rewatch often, written by Tarantino - True Romance, Natural Born Killers and From Dusk Till dawn. But only Pulp Fiction from his directing catalogue.
@yournamehere60022 ай бұрын
@@magnuskallas I think Pulp Fiction is massively overrated. Does he ever pay off Bonnie coming home? Is the French girlfriend necessary or just a boring reference to Breathless? Do they need Harvey Keitel to tell them to wash the car and take it to a junkyard? Even I would know to do that. His best films are the ones without pretension---True Romance, From Dusk Til Dawn, Kill Bill. Reservoir Dogs works because he's constrained by time, he can't make it into a three hour wankfest of movie references. The worst part of Natural Born Killers is the pretensions, not of Taratino, but Stone. The Shaman wanders in from The Doors and distracts from the movie's dark black comedy.
@yournamehere60022 ай бұрын
@@magnuskallas Pulp Fiction is massively overrated. Did Bonnie ever come home? Why did they need The Wolf to tell them to clean the car and put it in a junkyard crusher? Even I would know to do that. What was the point of the annoying boring French girlfriend except to make a pretentious reference to Breathless? The only good movies by Tarantino are the ones without pretension--True Romance, From Dusk Til Dawn and Kill Bill. Jackie Brown is overlong but is only good because of the source material by Elmore Leonard---and Out of Sight is infinitely better. Reservoir Dogs benefits from it being his first movie, which forces him to do more with less, rather than make a three and a half hour wankfest of movie references and pointless scenes. I would put Stone's U-Turn, Salvador or Talk Radio up against any Tarantino movie, and Stone would win, hands down. The only bad part of Natural Born Killers is the pretensions of Stone, not Tarantino---his Shaman wanders in from The Doors and temporarily sabotages the black comedic tone.
@KasumiRINA5 күн бұрын
Roger Ebert loved everything that was objectively bad, like Adam Sandler movies, and hated everything people liked, like Stanley Kubrick's films. There's no surprise he hated the love letter for serial killers too, I bet he would have praised Oliver Stone tossing putin's salad too!
@ErinJeanette25 күн бұрын
I was wondering why I was so confused why I thought this was a Tarantino movie but it wasn't but it is. Fascinating! Thank you!
@dawkinakus86653 ай бұрын
Natural Born Killers is a FANTASTIC movie!! I honestly don't care what Tarantino thinks about the final product. I'm not a fanboy who is going to start hating an awesome movie just because HE does! Great video, though, Lancelloti! :)
@yournamehere60022 ай бұрын
He's a raging egomaniac who can't stand anyone doing his movie
@Monkycrasure-gk4fz2 ай бұрын
Nobody asked you to dislike it because of Tarantino's opinion.
@Microverse1Ай бұрын
Thanks for doing this video. NBK is my favorite movie of all time, and I always heard that Tarantino hated it but I never knew why or heard him actually talk about it.
@BenMerrell-pn1fg3 ай бұрын
He hated that it was rewritten, he didn't hate the result of the script he wrote
@dzenacs2011Ай бұрын
For people who actually read his script - all this nonsense about it was sooo diferent is laughable. Its almost absolutely the same. Nobody knows what made Tarantino hates this film aside him and Stone.
@BenMerrell-pn1fgАй бұрын
@@dzenacs2011 In an interview I watched, he mentioned particularly disliking the Rodney Dangerfield fake sitcom bit
@Marmalade_Sally25 күн бұрын
@@dzenacs2011 You're just literally making things up lmfao... it's absolutely not almost the same (yes, i've read it, and I can link you to multiple write-ups explaining the specific difference if you want to rly be embarrassed), and Tarantino has discussed publicly and on multiple occasions the specific reasons why he didn't like Stone's version. Stop lying on youtube 🤣
@jeremyross21953 ай бұрын
Excellent editing and walking through the history
@NicholeOlive3 ай бұрын
I am personally happy that Stone picked this up. It’s one of my favorite movies. If Tarantino had it his way it would be a comic lacking meaning and purpose. Stone added a depth that Tarantino could never do. NBK is a masterpiece under Stone’s correction and direction.
@lancelloti.3 ай бұрын
Would you like to see Tarantino’s version of 'Natural Born Killers'?
@ebyahenbolico3 ай бұрын
Absolutely
@MumRah3 ай бұрын
No. That movie disgusted me in every way possible.
@TheInfiniteSheldon3 ай бұрын
Yes, but that movie had such insane editing, it would be interesting to see what other directors would do with the script as well.
@doofwarrior99123 ай бұрын
Then it did its job @@MumRah
@MightyEFX3 ай бұрын
imahine itll be his last dont think so tho
@BigFrogg3 ай бұрын
Tarantino making his version would be a pretty fitting choice for his last movie imo
@oophorror22513 ай бұрын
Read his script. It’s less than mid.
@Kasigi033 ай бұрын
I'd like to see him actually go in a vastly different direction for one last hurrah. Like Once a Upon a Time wasn't about gangsters or over all use of violence, until the very end. But who knows. Maybe he'll never even get to it. He's made nine movies that are more than perfectly fine if you ask me.
@owenedwards98073 ай бұрын
He sold the script, he doesn't own it
@Alfie2233 ай бұрын
Naw we want the Vega brothers movie
@vdeovisuals3 ай бұрын
Re-making his own story sounds like a terrible idea
@movies4life-x2v5 күн бұрын
He hate it because it's better than his version He may be a great author But oliver stone is an artist
@delix7873 ай бұрын
I think people are hating on Tarantino way too much and I will explain why. The version that you got with this movie is the one you’re so used to, so you can’t imagine another script because your mind is trained to only accept the only version that you got. If Tarantino had his original version and it did not go in another direction. Yes there is a chance the audience could love his version more. So if he believes that the audience would like what he had to offer, there’s a chance that they actually would. If both versions got the screen light, then the fans would debate making videos on which one did better, which one was written better, and which one has the better storyline? You’re only trained to know that only one version of natural born killers was made, and you will only accept this one version because the other version of this movie does not exist. But if it did, you probably would be taking back your opinions because when you actually have the real thing in front of your eyes, a lot of things could change immediately with opinions.
@holdwhatdoor76293 ай бұрын
Tarantino has made two amazing films. Reservoir Dogs and Pulp Fiction. Everything else he has done has been a Tarantino schtick recreation.
@JONINXBOX2 ай бұрын
I like NBK and definitely think it’s interesting how it turned out in Stones version compared to QT’s script.. originally NBK was a story Clarence was writing in an early version of True Romance but it was QT’s mate Avery who told him. To split it into two separate scripts cause the story was so good that it shouldn’t be just a smaller part of TR’s sub plots, Good video.. new to the channel and subscribed.
@cattlecooker9533 ай бұрын
This is hands down one of my favourite movies.
@GrrrTurtle3 ай бұрын
That movie is magnificent. I saw it as a kid in the theater. Watched it as an adult and was still blown away though I understood it through a different lens.
@ArcherGreen3 ай бұрын
Gotta watch this movie now
@EbonAvatarАй бұрын
I hate this movie. It's just deeply unpleasant to watch at all times. In every scene there's something ugly happening, and every frame is colored weirdly, or cuts in very jarring ways. Now I know that Oliver Stone was doing that intentionally, that's the effect that he wanted, and he's a very good filmmaker so he did a good job of making the movie unpleasant. It makes the movie nearly impossible to watch for me.
@Isabelle.Adjani.Stomps2 ай бұрын
Natural Born Killers is an underrated masterpiece!
@Zolotou260428 күн бұрын
Naw it's shit.
@Isabelle.Adjani.Stomps28 күн бұрын
@@Zolotou2604 Why?
@angryretrogamer73133 ай бұрын
Natural Born Killers is my favorite movie of all time. Partly because of the nostalgia I have for what happened in my life, how m I enjoy watching it and the soundtrack. I think Quentin Tarantino would have made the movie much better but it is what it is. It is still the movie I enjoyed the most probably of any movie in my life. I still watch it from time to time. I really enjoyed this video. Very well done sir and thank you.
@NTWoo953 ай бұрын
I had read that Natural Born Killers was part of True Romance, as a script that Clarence was writing. Wonder where that story came from
@JasonVoorhees101003 ай бұрын
I believe they were the same movie and he split them into 2. Lots of similarities
@KasumiRINA5 күн бұрын
True Romance is wholesome and the couple love and care for each other, and you root for them to get away from the drug barons that are chasing them NBK is about two psycho killers being worshiped by idiots.
@MouthBreatherGamingАй бұрын
Tarantino should make his version.
@LeviSchaffer-h1i3 ай бұрын
I love that movie. The song as the credits roll is great
@ENigma-um8zw3 ай бұрын
Waiting For The Miracle by Leonard Cohen
@OP-yt9ik3 ай бұрын
Closing credits is The Future, by Cohen. Waiting for the Miracle plays at the beginning. Anthem by Cohen plays during the prison riot.
@LeviSchaffer-h1i3 ай бұрын
@@OP-yt9ik thank you dude
@justaguy61002 ай бұрын
Honestly, True Romance is his best. I'd have _liked_ to have seen his original script for Natural Born Killers, but I can't imagine a way it could be better. And I have a very good imagination.
@justaguy61002 ай бұрын
Once Upon A Time in Hollywood is number 2, BUT just because I read "Helter Skelter" when I was a teenager, and would have dearly loved that outcome having happened. So, IMHO YMMV.
@KasumiRINA5 күн бұрын
@@justaguy6100 I like these two a lot but Pulp Fiction is my fav, I also loved Death Proof, the ending is just how villains need to be defeated (Hollywood and Basterds did the same). Kill Bill would be so much cooler if Zoe Bell played main hero IMO, Uma Thurman lets it down, she couldn't do most stunts and IMO Lucy, Vivica, Chiaki, Julie and Darryl are WAY more charismatic than her. Even Michael Madsen is! So you WANT to root for the Bride, but every other character who isn't Bill is more interesting.
@brokenphilotedmind3 ай бұрын
A Great film and a Great soundtrack...
@angryretrogamer73133 ай бұрын
Amazing soundtrack
@hubble90752 ай бұрын
Baby was a black sheep….
@User-uj7nz2 ай бұрын
"Repetition works, David. Repition works, David"
@mercster2 ай бұрын
I'm glad Stone made the movie he did. As with most successful artists, Tarantino is a control freak, and I get it. Ya can't win 'em all, bud!
@tyerffej2 ай бұрын
100% agree!
@jedidiahgirio15 күн бұрын
Great video man. I had a really unique experience watching this movie on acid when I was a teenager, and it was an amazing movie experience! It was like a living music video, with all the best parts turned into a story. It's still probably my favorite movie of all time.
@HeadbutKneecap3 ай бұрын
How crazy. I’ve tried to watch this movie 3 times and can never get through it.
@SuperKratosgamer3 ай бұрын
yeah, its crap
@e.l.gstudios313 ай бұрын
this is a best video essay about natural born killers & it's story different from stone (Director & frontman of the finished film that we all love & know today) & Tarantino (original writer of the film, but hate the result because it got messed up & re-tooled), which I would understand, but knowing, that it's great film, and after seeing this video, I'm really interested in seeing Tarantino version getting it's shot to the big screen & I feel like it would a a similar vibes to JAWS, not showing the sharks, but knowing their kills, like it will be a zodiac type scenario, but not seeing the killers until the very end, but in a non-chronological storyline, that would be fun, heck, I might do it, overall, in hindsight, Quentin's version = Zodiac + Jaws + Truman Show + all of his films, I will love it, no matter what
@dear_darling3 ай бұрын
I mean it’s kind of legendary that your first two scripts are directed by two of the finest directors in modern history. ❤
@Alpha23TV25 күн бұрын
True Romance was amazing. Natural Born Killers was solid. Would love to see both of these in Quinten Tarantino’s directorial style.
@UberTankred2 ай бұрын
It's not a Tarantino movie, that's clear while watching it. NBK is much more like Robocop, which is why I loved it. You have a director who earned two Purple Hearts in Vietnam and tried to show people the difference between what you see on-screen and what's actually happening. He released a documentary about the Ukraine War and the public will only understand what a masterpiece it is once the war is over.
@robhamilton47362 ай бұрын
Blah Blah Blah. Tarrentino movies are an adventure. Stones are good but more of the same.
@dp27thelight92 ай бұрын
@@robhamilton4736Natural Born Killers is better than all of Tarantino's films. Sits right next to David Lynches Blue Velvet.
@hahajones2 ай бұрын
@@robhamilton4736That’s the stupidest thing I have read today…It’s early, but I read a lot.
@mrkeogh2 ай бұрын
Putin's shill Oliver Stone?
@MF-dc8bi2 ай бұрын
Intersting vid! I've not watched it for years but I always liked NBK, although in an alternate universe somewhere there's Tarantino's version which I would love to see. Also True Romance rules!
@Formakiwi2 ай бұрын
The difference between Stone´s take and Tarantino´s personal style can be boiled to a couple of key distinctions: Tarantino has the mind of an adolescent, a video-store clerk for whom the spectacle of violence is jus thrilling cinema. Stone is the more mature film-maker, in that he declines to use on-screen violence as a means to excite the audience, but is more interested in the people who commit these acts and the consequences of them. Tarantino could never make a film like Platoon (1986), which sought to seriously interrogate American gung-ho militarism through the raw, painful and for Stone deeply personal experience of Vietnam. That more socially conscious outlook is anathema to Tarantino, who, despite his own great skill and panache as a film-maker, remains basically rooted in childish impulses and B-movie tastelessness, and can only view his subjects through a lens of virtuoso technical craft.
@KasumiRINA5 күн бұрын
Stone is the dude who made "documentary" movie where putin shown him a doctored video where US helicopter with Ukrainian pilot speech track on top was passed as russian spetznaz. There's ZERO respect he deserves, Oliver is a personal filmmaker of the worst tyrants to ever live. Also you sound like you have a broom in your arse.
@ttrestle2 ай бұрын
I actually liked the film because it was so different and artistic. And it made fun of entertainment tonight.
@calvin_k36783 ай бұрын
The problem is that stone revamped Tarantino’s vision for the film without fully understanding what he was trying to say. You can tell by the way he talks down about it, something that had been rejected, by trying to breathe relatability into the killers, he ends up neutralizing their uniqueness and turns them into common archetypes.
@steveleeart3 ай бұрын
He knew exactly what he was doing. He added a lot of ethos, pathos and logos to the bones of Tarantino’s story.
@LordVader10943 ай бұрын
@@steveleeartAgreed. I actually prefer what we got to what Tarantino would've wanted
@davedanger44143 ай бұрын
NBK was one of those movies that a lot of film nerds praised. I hated it. Still hate it. I'm surprised Tarantino hated it, but he had a specific vision in mind, I'm sure. The film thinks it's a lot smarter than it is. It feels like a student film. I've probably seen it 3-5 times, trying to convince myself that it was good. It's a slog and it seems like people like it because it's quirky and if you say you didn't like it, that just means you didn't get it.
@hellolistener.2 ай бұрын
@@davedanger4414Emperor’s New Clothes situation. Everybody telling me this is a great movie and it’s just not. So he added a backstory to the killers, so what? All he did was add an hour of bad improv and dutch angles in service of humanizing the murderers. Ironically, it seems this is exactly what the original script was criticizing.
@KasumiRINA5 күн бұрын
@@steveleeart ah yes, praising and humanizing serial killers. Exactly the type of pathetic shіt that should be frowned up, as you pointed out. While you used the word pathos to correctly call out Oliver Stone's work as pathetic, I don't think logos, Greek for WORD, means anything here? He added a lot of... words... to the script? And ethics is downright wrong, cheerleading for mass murderers is exactly what Oliver Stone does, and it's ANTI-ethical. Seriously, he humanized Hugo Chavez AND рutіn. Can't go lower than that, maybe next he'll make a film about family life of Kims from North Korea? What about Ayatollah home parties?
@tomatobooksentertainment8376Ай бұрын
Ok, most of the script is just the Wayne gale style.
@HULLGRAFFITI3 ай бұрын
I find it hard to believe that a guy who watches all sorts of obscure low budget crap hasn't actually watched what is an incredible film because he couldn't get through 5mins of a bit he didn't like
@bobcobb36543 ай бұрын
He spent months with the story during the writing process. He liked the story the way he wrote it. To see a supposed “satire” bit that demystified a main character took him out of it.
@Fiveash-Art3 ай бұрын
I saw it in the theater and felt like I enjoyed it. Watched it again about 10 years ago, and it's god awful. I was 20 when it was released .. shows how we change. It has some interesting sequences, but as a whole it's a pile of crap. I was taken in by the flashiness and the soundtrack more than anything I think.
@HULLGRAFFITI3 ай бұрын
@@Fiveash-Art It's certainly not for everyone but I have always loved that mixed media collage style Oliver stone does so well .He can say more with a half second insert shot of an eye or something than most ppl could with 20 lines of dialogue , NBk is like channel surfing while tripping where this mess of imagery actually makes sense . This 'U-Turn' and JFK are all done with the same impressionist vibe and I like it , But I can see why mainstream ppl wouldn't
@HULLGRAFFITI3 ай бұрын
@@bobcobb3654 He also knew enough about the world of film making to know any screenplay is gonna be made in the directors vision
@Fiveash-Art3 ай бұрын
@@HULLGRAFFITI I'm not what you'd call 'mainstream' .. I just think Stone has made some bad movies. As a whole, I generally enjoy a lot of what he's done. Platoon, Born on the 4th of July,.. Although he tends to white wash a lot of these political/historical events , there's nothing really all that unorthodox about what he does and it's as mainline as it gets. Just another ex military guy who saw some war without that much insight. His work is best when it comes from that personal viewpoint. Natural Born Killers is just cringeworthy gobbledygook disguised with a veneer of fake edginess. Embarrassingly artsy fartsy.
@jessisanchez81502 ай бұрын
He stole the story from Martin Sheen's "Badlands"
@alexwestconsulting3 ай бұрын
I remember watching this in the theatre. It was challenging to watch. It was supposed to be. And it was. I had already watched all of Tarantino's other work, of course, same with Oliver Stone, but this was next level. I can't imagine that any changes to script would have had any difference to the end product. This was Stone's movie in the end, a showcase of his directing more than anything else, him trying to make his version of a snuff movie, and it was unlike anything else. I feel like Tarantino is just bitter that Stone out-Tarantino'ed him.
@keithwellerlounge743 ай бұрын
It was challenging to watch because it was shit. Films should be challenging to watch, they are supposed to inspire and entertain. This film was dull as fuck, you cannot deliver a good story with such empty, boring characters.
@alexwestconsulting3 ай бұрын
@@keithwellerlounge74 Sure you can. Characters aren't everything. You can have a good movie simply by virtue of the cinematography. Or boring characters that have clever lines. Of even just great special effects. I'm not the biggest fan of the movie, but there's lots there to like. Name me a movie of that time with that much exposure that was as graphic, and I don't just mean the violence. Even Pulp Fiction was a pretty clean movie. NBK was startling in its rawness.
@anthonydelange41282 ай бұрын
I like Tarantino's mindset he only hates it because he wants better no matter how good it might look to the audience , in the mind of the creator there will always be flaws.
@digbyskellingtonАй бұрын
Oliver Stone’s problem is not that he’s “too satirical”; it’s that he’s thuddingly, monotonously literal.
@knifeteeth3 ай бұрын
Fastest 10 mins on the internet. Damned Well Done.
@craighicksartwork2 ай бұрын
The one script Tarantino wrote that I'm glad he didnt direct. NBK is a phenomenal movie.
@stlbum2 ай бұрын
one of my favorite movies of all time. They really don't make em like this anymore.
@gadaboutunited3 ай бұрын
Oliver Stone has made some good movies but f me, can he eff them up too! Also, sticking to historical accuracies seems to be his kryptonite.
@slayerduval13 ай бұрын
I'm so over people dissing JFK. It's an incredible film bursting with brilliant actors in every single scene. And it does an excellent job treating the biggest unsolved crime in our nation's history with the gravitas it deserves. It's also beautifully directed. I especially loved Jack Lemmon, John Candy. Walter Matthau, Joe Pesci, Kevin Bacon and the unparalleled Donald Sutherland giving a masterclass performance.
@itheuserfirst31863 ай бұрын
@@slayerduval1 Huh? Kennedy's assasination is not an unsolved crime. We know who did it, and why he did it. Stone is a conspiracy kook.
@arthurrimbaud72873 ай бұрын
He definitely went off the rails in the late 90's. His 86-91 is unparalleled.
@Banana_Split_Cream_Buns3 ай бұрын
@@slayerduval1 me too. The Vietnam War didn't just happen by accident. Of course _JFK_ is a propaganda movie but the whole premise of it was to get people to try to question the circumstances that lead to events that control their lives and determine history. There are still unsealed documents in regard to JFK's assassination and we just recently had a wholly and completely unnecessary attempt on one Presidential candidate's life, while the other Presidential candidate and current President was forced to drop out (see Seymour Hersch's recent piece detailing how Obama, Pelosi, Schumer and Jeffreys threated Biden with a suggestion that Harris was about to invoke the 25th Amendment) due to a mental condition (senility) that everyone has known about for the last 5 years.
@shamoney9385Ай бұрын
That’s pretty crazy cause that’s literally 1 of my fav movies EVER. It’s a classic fr
@doofwarrior99123 ай бұрын
This is 1 of my favorite films, the anxiety it induces isnt captured anywhere else. The fact tarantino hates that shit makes me like it even more. Fucking tired of his feet shots every 2 seconds
@PinaCollada-zp7vx3 ай бұрын
natural born killers actually sucks, true romance would probably be more iconic than pulp fiction if he made it but that’s my gay opinion
@PodyTheCirate3 ай бұрын
Damn was hoping this would be about The Movie Critic! As a huge QT fan I haven’t seen NBK and have no desire to
@octagonseventynine12533 ай бұрын
@@PodyTheCirate it’s better than a lot of his movies. You should watch it, the dialogue is very QT
@august63893 ай бұрын
It's pretty bad. RDJ is good but that's about it. Its a messy film
@Ultraway133 ай бұрын
PLEASE watch it and watch more movies. QT is not god of cinema and when you decide to explore cinema deeper than QT you are gonna find so many beautiful gems.
@brucewayne81583 ай бұрын
If Tarantino directed: Tim Roth as Wayne Gale, Michael Madsen as Jack, with Val Kilmer as Mickey and Angelina Jolie as Malory
@JeremyBearimy9132 ай бұрын
I don't think Angelina Jolie had even been discovered when NBK was being made. Hackers was her breakout role and that didn't come out until 1995.
@lennonmahoney7302Ай бұрын
Angelina Jolie? I can’t think of a film of his she’s in lmao, you mean Uma Thermin?
@brucewayne8158Ай бұрын
@@lennonmahoney7302 Uma Thurman would be good too, I just think Angie would’ve fit the role age-wise at the time.
@lennonmahoney7302Ай бұрын
@@brucewayne8158 I definitely would be more interested to see her take
@brucewayne8158Ай бұрын
@@lennonmahoney7302 Angelina or Uma?
@ikedogman13 ай бұрын
I get why seeing your vision turn out completely differently than what you had in mind would turn you off and cause resentment. Also, I love Natural Born Killers.
@Banana_Split_Cream_Buns3 ай бұрын
You should look up the video of Tarantino explaining why he hates Bill Murray films but loves Chevy Chase films. QT loves Chevy Chase films because the guy he plays is always an asshole from beginning to end but he hates Bill Murray films because the guy he plays always starts out as an asshole but "grows" over the course of the movie in a Disney fairytale like way to become some great moral character by the end of it. Tarantino argues that Bill Murray movies thus do not reflect the realities of human character: if someone is an asshole at the beginning of a particular set of events, they will still be an asshole at the end of those events. I suppose the difference here between Stone and Tarantino is their view on both morality and reality. Stone is very focused on moralizing, but Tarantino has a more existentialist view on life and morality: "the moral of the story here is that you were at the wrong place at the wrong time and as a result you are dead".
@AbeStephan3 ай бұрын
I think Lucy Liu said some 💩 about Bill picking on her while making Charlie's Angels . I still disagree with Quentin that STRIPES is a lousy movie .
@KasumiRINA5 күн бұрын
To add, Bill Murray IS an asshole in real life, and his entire career is him playing himself and everyone liking him in the end while he actually refuses to change and keeps being a bully. He launched an ashtray on Richard Dreyfus for SUGGESTING to change a line in the script! He's a psycho. So is Oliver 'mi amigo dictator who destroyed lives of millions' Stone.
@BOXINGFREEKS3 ай бұрын
True Romance is an absolute masterpiece though, I hope he doesn't feel the same about that one. It felt like a Tarantino movie through and through, the same way From Dusk 'Til Dawn did (albeit a different genre)
@HarpersInfiniteSystems3 ай бұрын
It's the most memorable and horrifying part of the movie. Tarantino is wrong, and he maybe hates it because his filmography does not take violence seriously.
@RogueBoyScout3 ай бұрын
I think Tarantino hates the film because Stone pretty much stripped his script and served it back to him as a psychological profile of Tarantino's shadow. And as much as I love Quentin's work, I get the feeling he isn't the kind of person who has Jung's Red Book in his home. And while I think Stone has become another one of those counter counter-culture personalities (what some people mislabel as contrarians), I for one believe Oliver's works always come from a place of wanting to advance the human condition to a good place...... ..... I just think him, like a lot of us, have lost sight of what that place is meant to be, due to somehow getting caught up in a dark forest none of us really saw coming....
@THEDONTTELLSHOW3 ай бұрын
@@RogueBoyScoutexactly that. He turned Tarantino inside out for all to see.
@mikespearwood39143 ай бұрын
@@RogueBoyScout Yeah, Tarantino just wants violence in movies as a "cool" teenage thing, and not taken seriously.
@THEDONTTELLSHOW3 ай бұрын
@@mikespearwood3914 there's a great comparison video of QT and PTA talking about violence in their films.
@itheuserfirst31863 ай бұрын
Nah, it was a bad film. Poorly directed, and poorly scripted. The over the top acting was annoying as well.
@VideoCommentsAndMore2 ай бұрын
I did ultimately find the movie uncomfortable to watch and didn’t exactly enjoy it, but I do appreciate Stone's take. I really think the sitcom stuff was wildly disturbing and worked really well itself
@jmdi27033 ай бұрын
Where we read Tarantino's original script? Any pdf link?
@ConernicusRex3 ай бұрын
Learn to use google before commenting.
@drownthepoor2 ай бұрын
Both Stone and Tarantino have made many films I love. Natural Born Killers, True Romance, Reservoir Dogs all special films. But Natural Born Killers always reminded me of Fear And Loathing because it feels like a fever dream.
@mryoshi12213 ай бұрын
i love this movie. first watched it during my rdj obsession. told my 7th grade teacher i saw it and she said "huh!?" rewatched it again at 22 and still love it
@barefootandindependentАй бұрын
I love Tarantino and I love Natural Born Killers and as a nice side note.... that TV sitcom scene is one of the best in the picture!!
@LazarusWilhelm3 ай бұрын
2:48 Ironic that Stone's alterations to Tarantino's script made a film 100 times more "morally repugnant" than anything Tarantino could just by changing the perspective from the journalist to the killers. That one change made a film that is painful to watch, edgy and psuedo-provocative drivel.
@habadasheryjones3 ай бұрын
@@LazarusWilhelm I'll never forget reading about Stone complaining about the Breaking Bad finale (he never watched any of the show up to that point, he just caught the finale by the way) and how it was just something like "violent trash." Like how can you talk that mess when you've only seen like 1/63rd of the story, grandpa? The dude turned Rodney Dangerfield into a incestuous scumbag and he's out here saying some exaggerated blood in Tarantino films is morally repugnant. And how does he get on a high horse about exaggerated violence when that prison riot sequence uses borderline cartoon slapstick imagery and sound effects? Is Stone the only one allowed to have fun with his film's use of violence? Dude thinks he can gatekeep that stuff just because he's Nam vet and knows what real violence looks like first hand.
@itheuserfirst31863 ай бұрын
@@habadasheryjones A ripe conspiracy nut as well.
@KasumiRINA5 күн бұрын
@@habadasheryjones look up what Stone makes now! A love letter film to dictator Hugo Chavez who turned Venezuela into most miserable country in western hemisphere, and multiple films demonizing Ukrainian people and praising рutіn for being a natural born killer.
@EpicDoom803 ай бұрын
Great film, brilliant soundtrack. I watched it on acid as a teen in the 90's and the movie really "unlocks". Its meant to be viewed like that, not as disturbing as you might think. Tarantino is a nerd that makes decent shlock, but he lacks true artistic chops. Hes been trying really hard lately to make some "legacy" films, but he basically makes the same movie over and over again. "True romance" is the best thing hes ever done.
@thirdhandlv42313 ай бұрын
You are definetely right, Pulp Fiction is just a piece of plastic that did nothing interesting or different at all, hence why everybody forgot it after 1994 and doesn't talk about it anymore, neither does anyone talk about any of his other movies, nobody cares enough about tarantino to talk about or even make a video about him or his material.
@THEDONTTELLSHOW3 ай бұрын
@@thirdhandlv4231 Pretty sure they were sharing their opinion, not that of a collective culture...a collective culture which has been airing every moment a Kardashian farts for a decade.
@wellsborie68973 ай бұрын
as horrifying as it is, and the copycat crimes, I fucking love this movie
@pasha_houston2 ай бұрын
Thank you for this insightful video, this was interesting to learn. Watched natural born killer ages ago, didn't like it, kinda hated it actually. Didn't know the story behind it. True romance was really cool, enjoyed that one.
@jmdi27033 ай бұрын
NBK is masterpiece film.
@brianmeen21583 ай бұрын
Agree I watch it every time it’s on
@ActionagogoOFFICIALYOUTUBE2 ай бұрын
Like it or not, this movie was ahead of it's time. Great video.
@mikes80203 ай бұрын
Natural Born Killers has a lot of good stuff in it but I don't think it totally works as a movie. Maybe Tarantino's version would have, considering how good he was at the time. The best thing about Natural Born Killers was the soundtrack.
@arthurrimbaud72873 ай бұрын
The last 40 minutes of the movie is fantastic.
@CoryBays2 ай бұрын
The sitcom scene was the best and darkest part of the movie…
@steveporter31613 ай бұрын
I’ve always found it funny how much Tarantino claims to hate Natural Born Killers and claims to never have seen the whole thing, when he stole the visual aesthetic for Kill Bill and even used the same cinematographer Robert Richardson ever since
@pete97153 ай бұрын
Haha
@itheuserfirst31863 ай бұрын
Well, Kill Bill sucked. They're not all going to be homeruns.
@alecrichards85742 ай бұрын
I love pretty much every Tarantino movie, and I loved this movie too. But I'd be fascinated to see the Tarantino versions he envisioned of this and True Romance.
@MrVisde3 ай бұрын
True Romance is a perfect time capsule of 90s action movie from Tony Scott with Tarantino dialog. It’s perfect. NBK is just grotesque. It was trying way too hard.
@Bodezefah3 ай бұрын
Natural Born Killers and True Romance are amazing! Some of my favorites
@josephmayfield9452 ай бұрын
I prefer Born Killers over most of Tarantinos movies. It doesn’t feel like a constant rip off of old genre pictures I’ve already seen.
@spacekitt.n3 ай бұрын
i think i was 14 or so when this came out and i saw it on VHS, and I LOVED it. Had never seen anything like it before, loved the trippy stylized way it was filmed and was shocked to hear QT actually didnt like it. In fact i was shocked years later to find out that this movie was panned when it came out as well. I guess people just dont have good taste lmao
@WeeklyTubeShow23 ай бұрын
I finished the script more than once. Never could finish the movie.
@s56hqr2223 ай бұрын
That sitcom scene is one of my favorite parts!!!
@itheuserfirst31863 ай бұрын
This is one of those films you might have loved as a teenager because it was so edgy and off its tits, but when you mature, and watch it again, you realize it was terrible. I saw Taxi Driver at 16, but my appreciation for that film has only grown. Let's be honest, neither director has the talent of 70's directors.
@deanjustdean78183 ай бұрын
Trying to show a more nuanced view of murderers who were abused as children during the 1990s was never going to age well, especially with the knowledge of the subject we have now.
@kaydgaming3 ай бұрын
I love it for its stylistic decisions. Its art.
@arthurrimbaud72873 ай бұрын
My take exactly. I still think Stone's best work blows away Tarantino's.
@radioyinko66263 ай бұрын
Hermano. Ando buscando tu canal en español. No recuerdo el nombre. Pasalo porfi
@tehf00n2 ай бұрын
And that's w-hyyyyy.... helicopters.... were not deployed. I remember the first time watching this movie. I had to rewatch it immediately.
@BNizzzz2 ай бұрын
Tarintino's 2 best movies are the 2 that somebody else made.