Honestly, the "Toppers' Answer booklets" provided by different Coaching Institutes online increases stress seeing the COMPLEX, FANCY, WELL DESIGNED content, making me wonder "7 minutes mai how"😅. Thank you for sharing these wonderful tips. The dream looks achievable 🙏
@rafeekpn21052 жыл бұрын
Yeahh
@anurag87852 жыл бұрын
Maggie bhi banne mai nakhre dikhati hai 7 minutes mai toh
@kajolpatnaik41222 жыл бұрын
You are right anwesha
@equityabcd59722 жыл бұрын
Same here
@mridulamaity91622 жыл бұрын
Same here
@Siiiaa3652 жыл бұрын
The ist time i read the answer i assumed i don't know it but after you wrote the answer ... i was actually knowing all the things .. So basically understanding such questions is the biggest challenge . Thanks sir for guiding us . 🙏
@upscaspirant25252 жыл бұрын
Right to privacy: In the puttaswamy vs UOI case, Supreme court held privacy as natural right thereby establishing the relationship between the individual morality and constitutional morality. Conclusion: Constitutional morality plays an important role with regards to the 3 organs of the government by means of check and balances. For example in above cases, judiciary checked the role of executive.
@civilserviceshouse2 жыл бұрын
In puttaswamy vs UOI case the right to privacy was declared as fundamental rights by the supreme court. RTP is protected as an integral part of the right to life and personal liberty under A.21.
@Kush.trails2 жыл бұрын
Right to privacy :- In S.C in recent judgment , right to privacy of an individual can not be curtailed as it forms the basic fundamentals of condition ie. Right to life and personal liberty Triple talaq judgement :- In triple talaq judgment s.c upheld the constitutional validity of triple talaq law ,as it was against the constitutional morality ie ( right to religion v/s right to equality ). Conclusion So from above judgement of hon. S.C we can conclude that "Constitutional morality triumphs over societal morality "
@shubhamsingh-lp8rx2 жыл бұрын
Sir i believe u r the only one here on YT, who is actually giving realtime check to the upsc aspirants.
@ritik405cr2 жыл бұрын
Olga Tellis case: Right to Livelihood Maneka Gandhi Case: Right to Dignified Life MC Mehta Case: Right to clean Air These Cases can also be quoted 👍
@gauravjanjal62342 жыл бұрын
Conclusion :- It can be seen from above judgments that the 'constitutional morality' is being kept at higher pedestal by judiciary through interpreting various constitutional terms in such a way that it would act as a precedents in future to protect essential facets of constitution.
@ArchanaKumari-sm3eh2 жыл бұрын
What a fascinating conclusion brow!
@vivekgupta88382 жыл бұрын
Are u preparing for UPSC?
@gauravjanjal62342 жыл бұрын
@@vivekgupta8838 Yes Bro just started in month of December!
@iamodgnoba98772 жыл бұрын
Amazing! Serious aspirants know all the contents which sir had written above. What we need is to understand the demand of the question appropriately.😅 Thank you so much sir for sharing the answer writing procedures. Fortunate to have you as a mentor through this channel.🙏❤
@lakhyanathbez65262 жыл бұрын
Was just waiting for the video and suddenly it comes , very impressed from your work sir .
@vinodbirudula77242 жыл бұрын
Me too
@ManujJindalIAS2 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much 😀
@ishratwazid12902 жыл бұрын
Hello sir Right to privacy judgement : Supreme court in Puttaswamy judgement held right to privacy as fundamental right under article 14,19 and 21 of the Constitution thus presenting a sign of Constitutional morality. Conclusion : From the above judgements it can be noted that Indian judiciary has shown us doctrine of constitutional morality many times. Also the preamble, fundamental rights, directive principles of state policy, fundamental duties and so on represent that constitutional morality is deeply rooted in the structure of constitution itself.
@manvendra28092 жыл бұрын
I used that as my first example in the paper
@shashwattrivedi44172 жыл бұрын
Very nice
@pallavimishra51792 жыл бұрын
Privacy Case - in the judgement Supreme court held that right to privacy is an integral part of right to life, expanding its scope to secure a dignified life to everyone, thereby sticking to the constitutional principles. Conclusion - it can be seen that through various judgements, Supreme court has responded to the evolving challenges and stuck with the constitutional morality to ensure justice in the country.
@satyasathish64772 жыл бұрын
Super ❤️
@helinajanmala7836 Жыл бұрын
awesome
@Save_water_grow_trees2 жыл бұрын
Conclusion -- constitutional morality is crucial for constitutional laws to be effective. Without constitutional morality the operation of the constitution tends to become arbitrary, erratic, capricious.
@piyushtiwari48322 жыл бұрын
Sir no words how gud u are ..God bless u
@iasofficer26602 жыл бұрын
Such initiative really helps those in particular who can't afford to join test series because of coaching loot!
@pawandev49872 жыл бұрын
4 words - raw, pure, informative, simple.....great work sir...literally changed my outlook for upsc papers
@bhaskyp19922 жыл бұрын
The Real Gem .. hats off Sir . You are helping hope for US
@yuvrajkhatri60742 жыл бұрын
Puttaswamy case - upheld the right to privacy which is important for vibrant democratic morals Freedom of speech and expression - anuradha bhasin case Navtej singh johar case - decriminalised homosexuality Vishakha guidelines for women workplace safety Democratic values and morals is essential for any democracy to grow And these judgement upheld those values and paved a way for better functioning of the country .
@jaswanttiwari80542 жыл бұрын
Right to privacy : it's give liberty and freedom of privacy of person according to( article 21 )safe fundamental right strictly (SC) judgement to constitutional morality Conclusion : thus above shows all judicial decision whether fundamental right ,parliamentery powers, and constitution doctrine principles, so that's mention constitutional morality.
@akashks75132 жыл бұрын
Consistutional mortality as a doctrine helps SC to stick to basics and strikes balance between activism and normalcy. It is a guiding light for constitutional interpretation.
@triviaimpulse68732 жыл бұрын
Sir,plz post this type of videos on a regular basis ,it is very beneficial for us ,,,,,and thanks a lot sir for ur immense guidance ,,,,,,,,,,,,,Thanks a lot sir,,
@becomemillionaire67882 жыл бұрын
Once again ,I can say your efforts is full of energy and full of true guidence ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ Much more Valuable for UPSC aspirants ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
@divyanisingh3662 жыл бұрын
You made it seem so easy. You boosted my confidence. Sir I request you to make more videos on answer writing. Thank you.
@rituyadav22552 жыл бұрын
Sir thank you so much ap sach mein guiding light .. baki sab complicate kr dete hain .. but u make it soooo sooo simple !!!! Sab samjh aata h !!
@AapkaBunty00082 жыл бұрын
Sir you are doing a great job by providing your precious time to aspirants.. Thank you so much sir..
@Nadiya018882 жыл бұрын
YOU ARE SO KIND AND GENIUNE PUBLIC SERVANT. WAY TO GO YOU ARE DOING VERY GOOD WORK.
@rajatdas16122 жыл бұрын
Thank you sir for this class. I was just stucked in arranging & putting the information precisely on a paper. Your guidance helped me a lot..Thank you sir, this type of class is very much beneficial for us, those who are dependent only on self study.❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
@transient61722 жыл бұрын
Thank u so much sir ♥ u r an inspiration to aspirants like us. Thanks a ton for ur invaluable efforts to help us out.U have a big heart. Hope i become an IAS and meet u one day.
@ManujJindalIAS2 жыл бұрын
It's my pleasure
@IASPCSPathshala2 жыл бұрын
thank sir..i too discussed the same thing in my video..hope this time i will clear the exam..finger crossed
@PraveenKumar-kd6gy2 жыл бұрын
Such a wonderful and useful information sir thanks for the valuable answer writing lecture with your guidance sure I will get IAS in 2023 sir
@buddhakonwar902 жыл бұрын
Sir ,could you make a video on how to approach Ethics ? I have seen many videos on KZbin of toppers on Ethics, but they only speak on how to entrich the contents rather how to study the subject. So it will be very helpful if you make a "beginner guide to Ethics" type of video.
@kuldeepchaudhary51235 ай бұрын
Hello sir.. Right to privacy judgement - In this judgement , supreme court said that right to privacy is the fundamental right under article 21 , which follows basic basic constitutional principles and values. Conclusion : it can be seen from above judgements that court is the interpretor of constitution and follows the principles of constitutional morality which is rooted in constitution itself .
@risakmendkhar48452 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much sir, i m from N-E Meghalaya, where accessing to any coaching institute is rare and may not available too, so having a channel like this one really helps me
@gameramve2 жыл бұрын
In KS puttaswamy case, SC put forward right to privacy which is a moral right of every individual. This help individuals in living a dignified life, by not letting know what ones perspective is about something and what one does. This helps in maintaining brotherhood and morality.
@studywithsuchii88432 жыл бұрын
Right to privacy - hold the constitution value of liberty of individual in their own space
@kaushiksingh16722 жыл бұрын
Conclusion - will include the question statement in conclusive voice and add some insights of my own way forward 🤔
@prashantkumarkapadia15362 жыл бұрын
I m new one , i don't have any source except internet , thnx fr guiding me through ur video.
@harshithv61312 жыл бұрын
sir, your way of approach to answer writing is really nice to grasp, please continue this series .....
@himanshusingh51882 жыл бұрын
Dear sir ..you have just boosted my confidence thank you sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo much sir ..humari dil se dua h ki aap bahut sari kamyaabi achieve krogey 🙏🏻
@kuchhbhi66772 жыл бұрын
Right to privacy comes under Article 21. It describes the importance of privacy in the life of a person. Conclusion: By above examples it can be clearly seen the value of constitutional morality upheld by various judgement in favour of human dignity.
@vikassrivastav99422 жыл бұрын
I was studying this topic and suddenly the notification of this video popped up...
@deepakpundir5732 Жыл бұрын
conclusion- From the judgments made by apex court mentioned above, it can be concluded that with the interpretation from constitution itself the basic fundamentals of constitution morality always presides over the decision of an individual or group as a whole
@darpanjain59462 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the efforts you made for us. It is really helpful for aspirants to have an ias like you helping us❤
@kartikraj75382 жыл бұрын
Sir, you are great..you teach & guide us in very practical way. Lot of love ❤️❤️❤️🙏
@prityraj40862 жыл бұрын
Thank you sir for this video. I just started to practice question and answer and so confused how to start introduction and body based on basic knowledge . I was not able to write answer of this question even I knew everything which you wrote . It helped me alot .
@ShubhamKumar-jk1lv2 жыл бұрын
Great sir ...thankyou for this type of explanation. I got very clear minded to write short and in time answers .
@komalshriwas2704 Жыл бұрын
This video has immensely helpef me to understand how to describe things in simple words and to the point ... thankyou so much for your efforts.. 🌺
@ManujJindalIAS Жыл бұрын
Thanks
@meghakhajuria14742 жыл бұрын
Really appreciate your support 🙏. Keep writing and guiding us. Gratitude and regards
@AttaUllahNaik Жыл бұрын
Puttaswamy Case, 2017 In this judgement, Supreme Court declared the Right to Privacy as a part of Right to life and Liberty(Article 21). Thus, emphasised the protection of privacy of an individual(not only citizens) to be one of the priciples of constitutional morality Conclusion: It is evident from the above Supreme Court Judgements that the constitutional morality must be a priority of the state to be followed as one of its guiding principles while formulating laws, rules, regulations etc. Even the judiciary is bound to follow the same principle while pronouncing its judgements.
@susmitharani94982 жыл бұрын
When you have read that question I felt low but after explaining the concept I am able to write the answer with the same words have you used in the answer and I felt very happy,thank you sir for boosting my confidence
@sid23722 жыл бұрын
Sir thank u for focusing on most important thing of UPSC CSE... time management and answer writing.
@rahiraghuvanshi7262 жыл бұрын
3. K.s. puttaswamy case (2017) : by this supreme court judgement the right to privacy is the fundamental right of every person under article 21. Conclusion: by such supreme court judgements Reflected "morality of the constitution" and also fullfill the aim of india constitution the balancing of power between parliament and judiciary.
@sanketsarode90052 жыл бұрын
Can also include NALSA VS UNION OF INDIA - recognised transgender as third gender Namam rebia judgement Shah Bano case Hussainara khatoon case - right to speedy trial Shreya singhal case - section 66 A was declared unconstitutional as it was violating freedom of speech And finally as per sir mentioned privacy judgement - right to privacy is an integral part of life and it's duty of state to protect citizens data Conclusion As envisaged by DR B R Ambedkar constitutional government has a duty to abide by its value and watchdog ( supreme court) of constitution has ensured accountability and checks and balances by its various judgement.
@nationalinfographic34072 жыл бұрын
SC judgement that struck down section 377 in IPC which was against basic human rights. The judgement upheld constitutional morality by putting fundamental rights over archaic laws.
@Rahulthewarrior.2 жыл бұрын
sir regarding Right to Privacy we may describe about the Pegasus virus which is Israel oriented and as supreme court made a committee regarding the investigation and its resulting into breach in personal privacy data of Individual....thank u sir for boosting us with yr answer writing...yr initiative will be boon for us definitely..
@heathledger64252 жыл бұрын
*conclusion-constitutional morality is an innovation which is not just to contain arbitrariness of executive but also provide a constitutional perspective to social, religious and other issues*
@a.a.aaanurag36242 жыл бұрын
Nice Conclusion
@vijaysagar3302 жыл бұрын
Right to Privacy: Sri Krishna Committe Right to Personal data Protection 2018.
@kunalrathore5282 жыл бұрын
Sir you do so much for the aspirants.... thank you so much
@Skkkkkk97112 жыл бұрын
The conclusion is the Supreme Court gave many judgement like keshvanandan Bharti case (1973) this case was also protect the fundamental rights also . And Supreme Court also gave the 39 constitutional amendment act was unconstitutional this show the constitutional morality. There were many cases also when sc proved the morality like golaknath case (1964)
@sumitbharti70622 жыл бұрын
K . S .PUTTASWAMY( right to privacy ) case It protects the right to privacy of persons as part of right to life(Art.21) and hence protects the constitutional morality .
@BPranoy2 жыл бұрын
It usually feels intimidating when some big coaching guys talks about answer writing as if this is something rocket science but they way sir explained it , it felt like I always had this in me, just needed a bit of belief and confidence on my own knowledge to manifest them in paper.
@sunilvijoriya86322 жыл бұрын
thank you soo much sir for helping us and improve our confidence 🙏🙇♂️
@cricketcv1852 жыл бұрын
Very very thanks sir.you are guiding us in right direction
@rishibector1592 жыл бұрын
Navtej jauhar case for individualist and liberty, sabrimala judgement, LIC case 1992, basic structure as part , Shreya singhal case for speech etc etc. It's not explicitly defined in constitution but attached to values and morals of constitution. Kesavandna Bharti case is watershed moment in constitution morality
@jitenderthakur35192 жыл бұрын
Simple and effective approach sir.....Fabulous 👌
@prachithorat45452 жыл бұрын
Keshavananda bharti case Maneka Gandhi case Naaz foundation case Navtej Singh johar case Puttaswamy case Olga tellis case Transgenders case
@shakirlone34712 жыл бұрын
Right to privacy : sc in puttaswamy judgments said the right to privacy is an integral part of art 21. Along with it sc in Maneka Gandhi case right to freedom of movement was upheld to be a part of art 21 I.e right to life and libert. CONCLUSION .. SUPREME COURT THROUGH VARIOUS JUDGEMENTS HAVE UPHELD THE CONSTUITIONAL MORALITY I.E GIVING WIDER CONONATIONS TO PROVISONS OF CONSTUTION AND IN TURN ALLOWED THE CONSTUITION TO BE INTERPRETED ACCORDING TO MODERN CHANGING WORLD BALANCING STATE LAWS AND INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM TO ALLOW THE CITIZEN TO HAVE CONDUCIVE ENIVORMENT OF OVERALL DEVELOPMENT
@samikshamalik9312 жыл бұрын
Right to privacy :- S C gave protection to people's fundamental right to ensure constitutional morality. Conclusion:- through various judgement S C maintained the importance of constitutional morality which serves as a foundational value.
@saamirsohail87052 жыл бұрын
With the reference to RIGHT TO PRIVACY = it proff is right to privacy is beyond right to life and it emerged in Aadhar judgment
@sameerturki43172 жыл бұрын
Pretty happy that I also had similar approach yesterday.
@Harsha16222 жыл бұрын
It can be seen from above, judiciary plays a vital role in safeguarding the basic structure of the constitution and interpret the constitution so as to sustain constitutional morality in the country. "It is by judiciary interpretation that we breathe life into the constitution".
@sahilgupta97372 жыл бұрын
Thanku sir ... I was reading these topic briefly and was thinking how ll I convert it to my answer. But u solved it and increased my confidence ... Once again thanku and meet u soon as an ias
@ManujJindalIAS2 жыл бұрын
Great 👍
@idyllicquest62592 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot sir for this extraordinarily-put lecture 🙌🙌💫 no one literally no one til date, ever has supposedly been this much committed towards helping students with all these skills and letting them know the nuances and subtleties of answer writing✍or I think even preparation approach for that matter, but it's only you sir who's actually making it so practical with writing live answers and really bursting all fallacious things about everything. .. Lots of respect sir you are extremely gracious and different from all you not only vocalise to help but you genuinely help us all.. Stay blessed and safe my lighthouse🙏❤🙌
@ManujJindalIAS2 жыл бұрын
Thanks so much
@idyllicquest62592 жыл бұрын
@@ManujJindalIAS my pleasure sir✨😌💫
@Evergreen_song11082 жыл бұрын
Conclusion We observed through above discussion that constitutional morality is spirit of the constitution which defining constitution is living document and when any issues pertaining around their so after that judiciary is saving his dignity.
@CRICK_FANCLUB-o4e2 жыл бұрын
Sir i would write under right to privacy part as it ensures dignified, free of external pressure life. And in conclusion part- because everything related to day to day issues not mentioned in constitution so judiciary take help of "constitutional morality" doctrine in decision making often.
@nikhil62422 жыл бұрын
Puttaswamy Case(2017)- This case held up the constitutional morality by delivering the verdict that ‘RIGHT TO PRIVACY’ is a fundamental right under article 21 of our Indian Constitution. Conclusion- Hence, from the above mentioned judgements, it is quite evident that constitutional morality is indispensable in today’s world.
@ajaynimbalkar69482 жыл бұрын
IR Cohelo case would also have been a better judgment where the ninth schedule was enacted to keep it outside the judgement of judicial review. this undermining rule of law and hence the judgment had been a remarkable one in judicial history. conclusion: In the light of the points presented above, it is clear that modern India values Constitutional morality as the supreme virtue. this ensures the rule of law and constitution as a source of morality for all, which has been seen from time to time. Thank you!
@raahiscreations30242 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much sir🙏😊
@AmanKumar-cd1gp2 жыл бұрын
Right to privacy judgement In puttu swamy judgement sc considered that right to privacy is fundamental right it can not breach except in somr circumstances Conclusion =from above judgement we can see no one can go beyond the principle or value of constitutional morality and make constitution to highest law of land
@Ritikkumar-hn2rk2 жыл бұрын
Literally after taking coaching also i am totally confused what to write how to write but all my doubt have been cleared in this 16:13 min.. This video made my day! Thankyousomuch sir for your precious time 🙏🏻
@NileshKumar-cq9fe2 жыл бұрын
The right to privacy judgement gave new definition to the constitutional morality as it protects the fundamental right of right to privacy which was provided by the Constitution to the people in India. Conclusion - hence above are the few examples vis a vis cases who helped to maintain constitutional morality in the country.
@anaghapatil2502 жыл бұрын
Right to privacy- K.s puttaswamy vs UOI brought in light that right to privacy is intrinsic part of art 21 which paved the path for government drafting data protection bill. Thus upheld constitutional morality.
@maharanathakur97502 жыл бұрын
My brother also cleared the Civil Services Exam but he will not create his KZbin channel for subscribers. There are many IAS who are working and are not engaged in other activities. Thanks 🙏
@varunpatil69142 жыл бұрын
In Puttaswamy case right to privacy considered as fundamental right their by underscoring the liberty of the individual. Thus constitutional morality is reflected in these judgement which is a key underlying principle of Constitution
@Upscaspirantjourney2024 Жыл бұрын
Right to privacy :- Puttaswamy case v/s Union of India in this case supreme court upheld the fundamental right U/A - 21 of consitutional morality of liberty of person with subjected to reasonable restrictions. Conclusion However consitution limited the power of parliament with subject to judicial review to protect & balance the fundamental right & welfare of people by politically, social & economically through various judgement without effecting basic structure of consitution & constitutional morality like liberty, equality & fraternity etc..
@manjeetkumar44272 жыл бұрын
Sir, I would really want to say thanks to you for this
@donquixoteonrocinante2 жыл бұрын
3. 'Right to Privacy' Verdict The SC added a new dimension to the doctrine of constitution morality in the above verdict aka Justice Puttaswamy case by declaring that Right to Privacy is implicit in Article 21 of the constitution. Conclusion - These above judicial decisions elaborated the doctrine of constitutional morality. The doctrine is also embedded in the Preamble, Fundamental Rights, DPSPs and other chapters of the constitution. Moreover, these decisions have also deepened the roots of constitution morality in the socio-political sphere of our country.
@Anustuv2 жыл бұрын
Conclusion: Constitutional Morality is a intuition that is to be cultivated in the minds of every responsible citizen . Upholding Constitutional Morality is not only the duty of our judiciary or the state but also of every individual.
@LIFE143.2 жыл бұрын
Puttawamy judgement..constitutional morality...right to privacy is a fundamental right..
@soumibiswas30652 жыл бұрын
Right to privacy- SC through this judgement upheld the idea that privacy is an integral part of Right to life ( article 21 ) in order to protect the dignity of an individual
@anandkanni43482 жыл бұрын
Sir another example Navtej Singh Johar verdict,(section 377 of IPC,1860)the Supreme Court observed in regard to social morality, that “Any attempt to push and shove a homogeneous, uniform, and consistent and a standardized philosophy throughout the society would violate the principle of constitutional morality.
@venkatavinay32222 жыл бұрын
R to privacy judgment - SC read down the sec.377 of IPC on the ground of personal liberty guaranteed under A.21 ensuring constitutional morality .
@upscfundamental70192 жыл бұрын
1)Under puttaswamy judgement supreme court held that right to privacy is fundamental right and comes under to the right to live a dignified life. So here it evolved out the ideas of privacy under right to life 2)maneka Gandhi vs union of India Under it supreme court evolved the idea of "principal of natural justice " under the domain of right to life.. 3) navtej Singh johar vs uoi SC decriminalised the homosexuality by using the domain of right to equality supported by constitutional morality 4)S R Bommai vs Uoi Concept of secularism and right to equality and others comes under the domain of basic structure by further examining it by using the constitutional morality .
@becomemillionaire67882 жыл бұрын
Highly grateful to you sir 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
@rashmibasavaraj40812 жыл бұрын
Make Gs 4 answer writing vedio sir pliz ....🙏🙏🙏.. & tysm sir for making such a helpful vedio ty sir...
@divyanshishukla35432 жыл бұрын
Right to privacy- supreme court protects the constitution morality under Ks puttaswamy case which protects right to life of citizen. Conclusion - thus , it can be seen by above judicial decisions that constitution morality is founded in constitution itself through artice 32 and checks & balances .
@learner97062 жыл бұрын
Constitutional Morality is a sentiment to be cultivated in the minds of a responsible citizen. Upholding constitutional morality is not just the duty of Judiciary or state but also of individuals.
@pallavikaul37562 жыл бұрын
Constitution is copy pasted from British law. Judiciary use heavy terms to hide their inefficiency.
@ayushmanshrivastava55142 жыл бұрын
We can also mention Decriminalising sec 377 and Section 497( Adultery) .in these judgements there was a conflict between Constitutional morality and Social Morality.
@laxmishivhare9188 Жыл бұрын
Can we include The Naz foundation case under which SC mentioned that only constitutional morality should prevail not public morality ? Conclusion- From the above judgements it is clear that judiciary has kept constitutional morality in higher pedestal and kept on difining in diffrent cases which protects the essential features of constitution.
@sumitbharti70622 жыл бұрын
In Navtej singh Johar case(2018) SC struck down section 377 of the IPC and upheld the right of homosexuals.
@johnkhumba91652 жыл бұрын
Consequently,we saw how the morality of constitution which is the facet of constitution is preserved and made supreme.These have shown us that from time to time and from case to case the constitutional values and principles are the guiding standard in various interactions between people and various arms of the state.