"White Judge Fines Black Woman, Then Discovers She’s a Federal Prosecutor!"

[@meazlesgolf3455]

I stopped listening at the 7:30 timestamp because this is unrealistic. 15 minutes late with a court filled with over TWENTY people waiting for their case to be called will take at least an HOUR to get through and that's being conservative. NO JUDGE (in my opinion will do such a thing as mentioned in this audio.) Even if the young lady case was called first, the judge would simply set it aside and continue with the other cases and then recall/readdress those that were called earlier. At that time he might reprimand them on their tardiness and then perhaps be dogmatic and aggressively adverse toward them which I can believe. However, to dramatically stop in the middle of another case to address someone coming into the court late AND knowing their name BEFORE they identify themself is highly suspicious. Nice try though!!!!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@ElyxStar]

1. Is it really possible for a judge to act this way? Generally, such behavior by a judge in court seems unusual and unprofessional. Courts typically operate under strict rules and procedures, and a judge usually does not interrupt other cases to focus on one person unless there is an extremely urgent or exceptional situation. 2. Comment on the audio's content: You called the audio unrealistic, and your argument is valid. Judges usually hear cases in order. If a party arrives late, the judge typically decides to hear their matter later or may reprimand them for the delay. However, interrupting another case to address a latecomer is not common practice. The judge's behavior in the audio seems to be presented in an exaggerated or dramatic manner. 3. General principles of courts: Courts operate in a very organized manner. Each case has a scheduled time, and parties who fail to appear on time may have their matter postponed. Judges generally: Hear scheduled cases in order. Reprimand latecomers, maintaining the decorum of the court. Avoid unnecessary interruptions or giving special attention to individuals. Conclusion: Your objection seems valid. The incident described in the audio appears to deviate from typical judicial practices and seems unrealistic. It is likely exaggerated or presented with a specific purpose in mind.