THANK YOU for respecting the archer's range difference! Gives a much more balanced 1v1 analysis!
@DemonAgeOfEmpires2-wf8lv4 ай бұрын
Also gives a slight edge to the fastest units so speed will also be a factor as in real games. Thanks for the comment
@2TonTonyGalento4 ай бұрын
Fun Fact: Incan FU Eagles have the same pierce armor as Huskrls
@DemonAgeOfEmpires2-wf8lv4 ай бұрын
@@2TonTonyGalento I didn't know that, thanks for the info!
@reto685927 күн бұрын
I guess inca eagles would have performed better than mayans in any of this matchups, except against the balisaelephant.
@arturstick10 күн бұрын
@@reto6859 would die against the composite bowman
@jeffer94194 ай бұрын
This test doesnt show the whole picture. There must be fights in big numbers, im sure ghulams would do much better in them, fo example
@felixsuarez76634 ай бұрын
However Huskarls are still better in any fight against archers, even with their piercing damage, the ghulams are not even close in comparison to the tankiness the huskarl gives you, I think the ghulam to be a better soft counter to archers, since the Hindustanis themselves doesnt have great opctions against archers
@benedictjajo4 ай бұрын
Even In big numbers, if archers are in staggered formation, then Ghulam will still perform way worse than Huskarls.
@徐瑋成-i5c4 ай бұрын
Huskarls is better than ghulams. Because CA in castle age have 6+2 attack 。But Goth eco are not good to win the federal fight .
@divicospower91124 ай бұрын
@@felixsuarez7663 Fully upgraded skirmishers and hussars. Not bad against bowmen.
@aadisaadi76383 ай бұрын
@@felixsuarez7663ghulams have their own advantage of being faster and better against a lot of other units . But ya against archers huskarals seem better not by a lot though
@5Xum23 күн бұрын
Huskarl just does not give a fuck. The other two running into battle, he just casually walks up to his victim and slaughters them. Oh it's an elephant? No problem, watch me Legolas that shit.
@harshawardhanthopate4874 ай бұрын
Poor ratan archer, his death actually hurts 😢
@SethBennion4 ай бұрын
I think that the Inca EEW is more anti-archer than the Mayan one, because it takes one damage from most archers instead of two. Because of this, against a fully upgraded arb, they take 10 more shots, and even more if the archer has 7 base attack like cav archers and a lot of unique archers do. The composite bowman, however, is an exception to this.
@DemonAgeOfEmpires2-wf8lv4 ай бұрын
@@SethBennion true. I will have a separate video about them
@SethBennion4 ай бұрын
@@DemonAgeOfEmpires2-wf8lv Thanks! Maybe you should also include Burmese cavalry and the Savar as well. Or, you could make a separate video on anti-archer cavalry if it becomes necessary and you desire to do that.
@aspirenux85994 ай бұрын
I think every Archer test should be at least 3 archers/group. A
@fedrick1connery6074 сағат бұрын
The ballista elephant did not do as well as I expected. Interesting
@jefferson80554 ай бұрын
I wanted to see the Elite Shrivamsha Rider too
@DemonAgeOfEmpires2-wf8lv4 ай бұрын
@@jefferson8055 they will be featured in a future video for sure
@CBHikingWA8 сағат бұрын
if only 1 archer attacks, the shield will keep generating making the rider effectively unbeatable
@RheaMainz4 ай бұрын
A follow up series could focus on which of these five civilisations counter Armenians the best! Which of their supporting units could lead to their main anti archer unit triumphing over the likes of Composite Bow compositions!
@DemonAgeOfEmpires2-wf8lv4 ай бұрын
@@RheaMainz true. Armenian bowmen need their own separate video.
@DemonAgeOfEmpires2-wf8lv4 ай бұрын
@@RheaMainz true. Armenian bowmen need their own separate video.
@pillbox20794 ай бұрын
Huskarl is Huskarl. I have two questions. 1. What script do you use for two armies to attack each other? 2. I really like the scenes and environments you create for each video. Why not use max graphics for them?
@DemonAgeOfEmpires2-wf8lv4 ай бұрын
@@pillbox2079 I use triggers, not scripts. I have some tutorial in my older videos if you want to check them out. Check my playlists and you will find them. 2-I do use max graphics. I don't know they come out this way. It's the rendering process that ruins them, despite using 4K capture etc..
@KananovOffical4 ай бұрын
I love this concept.
@DemonAgeOfEmpires2-wf8lv4 ай бұрын
@@KananovOffical thank you!
@pa_sya605013 күн бұрын
Хускарл, как батя Показал сынка, кто тут сила👑
@AhmadFauzi-pd2tb4 ай бұрын
One man kill an elephant+man like wtf😂😂
@DemonAgeOfEmpires2-wf8lv4 ай бұрын
@@AhmadFauzi-pd2tb 😂😂
@antugino1363 ай бұрын
Gimli: that still only counts as one 😡
@nafg1154 ай бұрын
One for the algorithm
@DemonAgeOfEmpires2-wf8lv4 ай бұрын
@@nafg115 you're the best!
@TheKobasen4 ай бұрын
If used against multiple archer that's where ghulam got shiny.
@timoschmonsees26524 ай бұрын
Why is the eagle killing the ballista elephant faster than the huskarl?
@RomaInvictusSPQR4 ай бұрын
i think balista isnt archer class so no bonus damage ... instead cav class and eagel have cav bonus attack
@kalifzerich71874 ай бұрын
Bonus vs cavalry maybe
@timoschmonsees26524 ай бұрын
Ah right the cavalry armor explains it
@DemonAgeOfEmpires2-wf8lv4 ай бұрын
@@timoschmonsees2652 eagle has bonus damage against mounted units if I recall correctly.
@mazterlith4 ай бұрын
It is because a ballista elephant is both siege (+5 bonus to eagle attack) and cavalry (+4). This is almost as good as the attack bonus vs monk (+10).
@sajasdia79764 ай бұрын
How about shrivamsha rider?
@DemonAgeOfEmpires2-wf8lv4 ай бұрын
@@sajasdia7976 I will in a future video. In this I wanted only foot units.
@Colo19943 ай бұрын
Ghulamd
@BirikinPrimary4 ай бұрын
In the terms of this its obvious to say : Huskarl %100 anti-archer Eagle Warrior is flexible between anti-archer and anti-cavalry Gluham? sorry they aint any good imo
@RomaInvictusSPQR4 ай бұрын
Ghulam are amazing ... this test doesnt work the right way for ghulam strength
@SuperD8634 ай бұрын
Eagles arent anti cavalry at all. The correct way to see their anti cavalry bonus is as a way to make sure they dont get completely outplayed even by light cavalry. Because even scout line, which is both the cheapest and weakest cavalry line tends to trade very well vs eagles.
@BirikinPrimary4 ай бұрын
@@SuperD863 I didnt said they are %100 anti cav,i said they are between anti-archer and anti-cav half to half...
@olorinistar99034 ай бұрын
Ghulam are good vs groups of archers because of their penetrating damage, which is not seen here at all
@benedictjajo4 ай бұрын
@@BirikinPrimaryhow are Eagles any good against anything other than archers? They pretty much lose to all melee cavalry. At least, Huskarls are great against archers, decent against other infantry, and are dirt cheap and quick to produce. If anything, Huskarls are more flexible than Eagles.
@purevsurenpuje92834 ай бұрын
Ghulam can kill multiunits
@DemonAgeOfEmpires2-wf8lv4 ай бұрын
@@purevsurenpuje9283 yes but is that enough against archers?
@muller074 ай бұрын
Dude. You made your test wrong. The inca eagle is better against archers. Is the one with more armor. This simple fact break your whole test
@3snoW_4 ай бұрын
Mayans have more hp, that is more impactful against certain matchups like composite bowman. And aztec eagles have more attack which leads to faster kills, so less shots taken. There's an argument to include all 3 eagles. But if you're only including one, the Mayan eagle is considered to be the strongest in general so I would pick Mayan as well.
@DemonAgeOfEmpires2-wf8lv4 ай бұрын
@@muller07 mayans have almost double the health. The +2 armor of incas is inferior. I did a comparison not long ago between them.
@muller074 ай бұрын
@@DemonAgeOfEmpires2-wf8lv yes i saw it. And against arbalesters incas was the better...as was in SOTL videos. The mayan is really better weel rounded. The azteca can kill faster. But the +2 in armor makes it count.
@DemonAgeOfEmpires2-wf8lv4 ай бұрын
@@muller07 you are not wrong, I will have to make an extra test about it