Hands down Ohtani because we need to move on from rewarding the simple spectacle of watching homeruns (while still difficult) and learn to appreciate the wonders of Ohtani’s duality, the combination of power and grace like we’ve never seen before. 単純に彼が凄すぎて把握出来てない人がまだ多いのとアメリカとしては当然アメリカ人に受賞してもらいたいのがメディアを通し反映されてるのが分かる。けど最終的にはたった30人の意見だから最後までどう転ぶか分からないので結果が楽しみですね!
Even if Ohtani is Honduran or Malaysian, I would choose him without hesitation. A master who hits 10 wins and 30 homers is better than a superman who hits 80 a year.
As Mr. Fletcher rightfully said few weeks ago, it’s as difficult as comparing apples and oranges. “BIG APPLE” VS “Orange County”? To make comparison easier, how about converting “apples”(HRs) to “oranges”(pitcher’s Wins) and vice versa? If Impact Coefficient should be 2.5 (meaning Impact Ratio of W and HR is 1W:2.5HR), conversion of Shohei’s 12W to HR is 30HR as of September 13th. Adding his actual 34HR makes 64HR already! SHOHEI 64HR:JUDGE 57HR. To avoid redundancy, I’ll skip the conversion of HR to W for now. Shohei’s 5 more HR and 2 more W makes 39HR and 14W; conversion 73.3HR passing Barry Bonds, while Judge hitting 8 more to make only 65HR. Oh, by the way, Shohei 2021 conversion is 68.5HR, so he is well on the way to surpass himself again!
@totalbasesgainedtbg41422 жыл бұрын
There is a lot of discussion about which of the two is more deserving of the MVP, and it's confusing to see from outside the discussion because people can often rely on a very biased perspective. There are many ways to judge each of these accomplishments, but as far as I can tell, I feel that none of them can be used as a definitive argument. Currently, WAR is a well-known indicator for evaluating players from multiple perspectives, but as this video mentions, it seems unclear and unfair in some areas. The view you present also seems a bit thin on the ground that the factor has to be at that value. Here is a suggestion. How about using only the values based on play without the extra coefficients as shown below?
@totalbasesgainedtbg41422 жыл бұрын
Let's use a number directly derived from baseball, the base, as the unit of evaluation. Convert a player's value to the number of bases he has gained. Here, I wrote the Total Bases Gained as the sum of total bases, BB ,stolen bases, caught stealing and HBP. First, let's convert Ohtani's pitching value into batters' units. The current A-League all pitcher's ERA average is 3.88, and Otani's ERA is 2.55 and IP is 141, so he contributes 20.8 runs more than the average to his team. I consider this to be the runs gained by Ohtani as it is. That's roughly 83 bases. Next, let's look at the hitting value. Judge's total bases gained are 459, and Otani's are 347. Also, if the average hitter's total bases per game is calculated from the total bases gained by all A-League hitters, it comes out to 0.45. Based on this value and the number of at-bats the two hitters have, it comes out to how much better the two hitters are than the average hitter. Judge and Ohtani are 190.3 and 86.8, respectively. Now, since the value of Ohtani's pitching performance was 83 bases, Ohtani's overall value would be 83+86.8=169.8 bases. This means that Judge is currently contributing about 20 more bases or 5 more HRs to the team than Otani. I believe this makes Judge the most valuable player so far.
WAR doesn't properly calculate Ohtani, DH deduction is wrong, plus as a 2way player, he's 1:1, an elite 1:1. The dig on Ohtani is the home/away splits, whereas Judge is about even. Ohtani has great pitching clutch numbers like Judge has great clutch hitting
ジェフ・フレッチャー氏はこの動画の中で「「MVP」すなわち「最も価値のある選手」とは、私にとって「最もチームに貢献した選手」である」と一貫して話をされていますが、一方で「最も価値のある選手」の定義は各投票者の判断に委ねられているとも言っていますね。確かに過去には「MVPとは最もチームに貢献した選手」と明確に定義されていたようですが現在は「最も価値のある選手」としか定義されていないのであとは投票者の判断基準で決まるということなのでしょう。 一方NPBの最優秀選手は「最も活躍した選手」と定義されているようですが、では「最も活躍した」とはいったいどういう意味かなのか?というとこれも曖昧で投票する方にとって悩ましいところでしょうね。 The Most Valuable Player Award is given annually to one player in each league. The award began in 1911 as the Chalmers Award, honoring the \"most important and useful player to the club and to the league\". This award was discontinued in 1914. From 1922 to 1928 in the American League and from 1924 to 1929 in the National League, an MVP award was given to \"the baseball player who is of the greatest all-around service to his club\". Prior winners were not eligible to win the MVP award again during this time. The current incarnation of the MVP award was established in 1931. The Baseball Writers' Association of America (BBWAA) votes on the MVP award at the conclusion of each season before the postseason starts.