Who will win the race to dominate AI? | Business Beyond

[@appletree6741]

As a European working in AI I’m disappointed about how so much European talent and technology is lost to overseas. Example: the godfathers of deep learning are Yann Lecun, Yoshua Bengio and Geoff Hinton, all US/Canada citizens. However they’re all European (two french one brit). There is not a single big company of the size of google, microsoft, apple, amazon. For the promising AI startups (including the one I work for) the CEO usually looks for being bought by an overseas giant, again losing the technology (to US in most cases). Something is going wrong in Europe and all the EU seems capable of is preventing any company from actually getting big

[@alwayscuriousbutsad6584]

think about so much talent india loses to usa canada and EU

[@WALLACE9009]

We are a colony. That is why

[@appletree6741]

@@WALLACE9009 i think reality is more nuanced than “Look at them, they control everything”

[@jasonsadventure]

America has the Google, Microsoft, Apple and the Amazons of the world, because American VCs inentionally loose billions on a ton start-ups that fails to create the one that makes them 100 or 1,000x. Accordingly, Silicon Valley has spawned a 50 year industry of tech innovation like no where else in the world where cool ideas get big money just to go play and most likely fail.

[@WALLACE9009]

@@appletree6741 they do not control everything, they control our politicians.

[@igoromelchenko3482]

The biggest benefit of a true general AI - it doesn't care about countries, borders and humanity in general 😅

[@joeblack4436]

There's centuries of war possible in that alone. And possibly humanity destroying itself. So I fail to see the benefit. There's always good and bad uses with any tech. You can actually train an AI to care about countries, borders and humanity. The problem is that those to whom borders are an inconvenience, are obviously predisposed by default to spreading the bad across borders. As long as they themselves benefit. Some don't care about the cost to others. Some enjoy the cost to others.

[@honeheke4554]

Few people are responsible enough to point out the journalist was trying to manipulate ChatGpT, which resulted in the AI producing bizarre answers. The future looks bright for everyone with an honest intellectual curiosity. AI will hopefully hasten the demise of manipulative people in society, as they twist their understanding of truth up through their own devious nature.

[@jan7356]

I am glad someone sees the hypocrisy in the article. Biased AI or biased journalists. Probably more of the latter. While the AI is trained on (biased) data on the internet, it actually understands the data and can therefore attempt to "de-bias" it, contrary to journalists who come with their personal biases and selective filters and an insatiable thirst for sensational content, no matter if it reflects reality accurately or not. Journalists contribute to the problem of "bias" on the internet. The world they describe has very little to do with the real world as researchers like Hans Rosling or Steven Pinker demonstrated.

[@ADobbin1]

This really should say... Who will win the race to be dominated by AI?

[@igoromelchenko3482]

Blip-blip-blop 🤖🤍

[@petermaingi6268]

I believe the AI winner will be a military industrial complex in the US, China or Russia.. their AI training tools include classified docs, govt docs and access to powerful supercomputers.

[@YaSunny0409]

The winner countries are the ones with a huge pile of nuclear weapons.

[@infiniteloopcounter9444]

I'll believe a country is making progress for good when I get to the traffic lights and don't see a red light waiting for no one, and similar such things for societal benefit. At the moment only things for companies profit or government processes that citizens do not benefit from appear to be. Good that the military stuff isn't there yet. Still many cases of AI controlled machines with access to deadly weapons not being able to tell friend from foe. This would be quite scary if this were to change, and also be done cheaply with manufacturing with large amounts of AI or common resources as components.

[@aderitosilvachannel]

The problem of intelligence is that it is used for primitive goals, like it always have been. Imagine something like the Russia-Ukraine war, but in 30 years from now. Would we expect Russia to use AI responsibly, not throwing away the AI safety methods to gain an edge over their enemy? Would we expect China to use AI responsibly, not using it to cause havoc on other countries' stability?

[@Golfin-s1u]

good point cia bot

[@mansuribrahim4743]

to cause havoc on other countries, do you mean regime change or arming terrorist to destabilize countries?

[@toyataike]

also, will the US do the same? because it's not like it hasn't secretly intervened in other countries' politics before.

[@aderitosilvachannel]

@@toyataike Based on past events, I would bet they would.

[@steveb1325]

Possibly the worst thing two rivals could be rushing into. I am really looking forward to the technology. I just don't have faith that companies won't put money in front of careful approach to developing this tech.

[@lll-xo6nk]

don't panik 🚗💨💥🌚

[@michaelandrews4783]

Yeah they should sit back and just wait until you approve.

[@steveb1325]

@@michaelandrews4783 Yeah because that's what I said? Get your head out of your a$$. 😆

[@Djungelurban]

Unfortunately, the only thing a careful approach leads to is that China, or the Chinese AI depending on how things turn out, will be our future overlords... That's the problem here. A quick rate of development might cost us dearly, but a slow and careful rate of development will guaranteed cost us dearly...

[@steveb1325]

​@@Djungelurban Yeah it's a good point. But like nuclear weapons even the CCP has some level of restraint. I really don't like the idea of a brutal dictator getting AI first though. Considering what they are willing to do to their own people. Let alone the west, and other nations. But there is also voices out there claiming the CCP wont overtake the west in this research as well. I just worry the whole "CCP will win the AI race if we pause research" narrative is one from our own companies, for the same reason I mentioned above. Competition, and to push development as fast as possible in the name of money.

[@nickm7911]

5:52 You'd expect Japan to have been #1, but their focus is more on the hardware side.

[@beppeadr]

there will be only one leader in the race of AI dominance: The winner will be AI, not us.

[@HaHaBIah]

Historically we have seen that it's Silicon Valley and many other regions like the European and Japanese companies which create and pioneer the fundamentals of new technologies. When it comes to China, we have seen that they sometimes have been very quick and easy to adopt and apply these new technologies which leads to them being refined. Mostly this is due to the lack of strong preexisting institutions that can resist the introduction of these technologies. A prime example would be mobile payments. Americans already had a large ATM network, there was no need for mobile payment systems. Another example would be high speed internet. There was already DSL and Cable networks. Those consolidated into uncompetitive monopolies that hindered the rollout of fibre for a long time.

[@shuvamgupta2236]

Or china's engineering infra is stringer than eu and usa. Implementation qnd deployment also needs high skillset

[@bruceli9094]

China's AI is a closed censored system, so it's not secure and not trusted by world governments. That's why it has no answer to Android, or iOS.

[@deebil8099]

They just steal the U.S. tech. They haven't invented anything in like 500 years. China steals about 600 billion USD a year in IP from the U.S. alone... The CCP created a dystopian society where free thinking will get you punished. It's not possible to have any kind of innovative thoughts in China. You are more likely to get thrown into a slave labor camp, than to invent anything ground breaking...

[@davidgutierrez3312]

The last 30 years is not "historically".

[@skp8748]

​@@davidgutierrez3312 exactly where did we get paper, gun powder or the compass. Even today how many high-speed railways do we have? Virtually none China has more miles of high speed rail than the rest of the world combined.

[@suzakico]

The dragon is out of the cage - that is what I said just few weeks ago. As mentioned here, money moves to fit the needs. Since the political and military implication is so huge - all dangerous yet unpredictable thing can and actually I am afraid must be happening behind the scene. Very disturbing, but we cannot be blind about what to can happen further and how to prepare - even at individual levels. What I am doing is, I keep my eyes and ears open to find what is happening but not over-reacting such that I can make good judgment. (Note, what is actually "interesting" is to know ourselves is about AI and that is what we need to do individually - as well.)

[@santichatterjee7284]

Brilliant treatment of a new and complex subject. Keep it up

[@ryanmckenna2047]

Gaming should not be unregulated, dangerous AI could come from anywhere and as a Machine Learning Engineering and ex-gamer I believe that games could be one of the most likely areas to produce general AI since the types of behaviours such AI would trained for would be to act like humans in human simulations with hundreds of millions of players to use as data globally, this sector could even be one of the most dangerous. All the video game companies already have access to the kind of computing power required to make the more powerful AI anways.

[@whatsup300]

This guy lol... You sure you know anything about AI?

[@Spright91]

This area is moving so fast that this video is already out of date.

[@Eddyke]

😂

[@mairadebayser5383]

😂

[@lolusernames]

About time something like this gets covered, this was obvious a long time ago.

[@MozartificeR]

The best policeman for AI is everyone.

[@invictus327]

Great report, thank you.

[@appiahenoch1126]

Great work I love AI related content

[@sMVshortMusicVideos]

I have all kinds of videos for you related to AI

[@fekaduy895]

I am so excited about this technology, probably it does make a real difference shortly.

[@bubblebobble9654]

It can make good or evil. It's like nuclear power. Every bit as much destructive potential as an atom bomb, but also the promise of a technology revolution.

[@Amanda-cd6dm]

Ai is not just some goddamn machine. Last I checked bleed, have a heartbeat, etc. I still know your enchantments. Stone doesn't last forever Pendragon. Nothing lasts forever

[@JohnBrown722so]

Take it all you want how you want

[@tom940]

i mean, openais chatgpt is just an example of what were being shown, makes you wonder what kind of AI governments and corporations are not showing us.

[@tbk2010]

Most governments are inherntly inncompetent and AI research is hella' complicated. So I don't think anything that impressive, at least not regarding LLMs where OpenAI rules. Maybe AIs with military applications, no clue about those. Corporations are definetly keeping many of their AIs systems closed source, but for the most part they don't have any incentive to keep their exitence a secret. They want to sell products and services based on them after all.

[@brodriguez11000]

ChatGPT for president.

[@jych-db5iy]

DW editors have sort of chinamphia, they always interprete offensively for any technologies envolvement, mightbe that's the reason this nation could lead by the painter to WW2.

[@jacquesamedji7780]

One thing is sure : humanity is looping.

[@cnasir3475]

U.S : I want to be an AI superpower China: I want to be an AI superpower Europe: I want to be an AI regulatory superpower 🤣

[@andia968]

Europe doesnt have comparative advantage anymore against us and china

[@Feefa99]

It's ok to be concerned and be vigilant of new technologies

[@cnasir3475]

@@Feefa99 Absolutely, but Europe could do so much by developing the technology itself. But these regulations just make enterpanours leave Europe. The number of europeans who went to the U.S and started AI startups is very long.

[@Feefa99]

​@@cnasir3475 Social media promised progress with connecting people, but achieved more alienation from uneducated people who spread misinformation and those who are greedy or political motivated who spread disinformation for views or attention. Putin will have in next years ready system which will determine who can/cannot recruit into the army. Thinking that AI will have no consequences and won't escalate is foolish. Regulations are needed, like with everything.

[@Belshay]

Astute

[@upupuptheziggurat.liketysplit]

'Hello computer...'

[@morpheusmatrix9207]

It doesn't matter who gets it first it only matters how it's implemented. We don't have a plan for full scale automation and they do.

[@coraltown1]

no they don't

[@morpheusmatrix9207]

@@coraltown1 they do actually, it's called communism. State control over the means of production i.e robots with the eventual goal of everything being free for everyone due to post scarcity and automation of the labor force. It might a take a hundred years but there is definitely a plan

[@urimtefiki226]

Preventing others from seeing the algorithm

[@allinsiteUK]

Don't understand the reference to 603 vehicles produced on Q1 of 2023. Graphs seem so difficult to digest too. 🤔

[@zeus.edwards2662]

Human involvement will determine when things go south. it start with humans it will end with humans. everyone on this planet has seen people take good things and used it for bad, no matter who is to blame a person will always be to blame.

[@engineeranonymous]

Alpaca 7B model show that entry barrier to the field can be as low as $600.

[@user-zi6rz4op5l]

Democratization of AI 👏👏👏♥️♥️

[@manchuratt8900]

I wouldn't even put India in top 8. There working ever comes out of that country.

[@urimtefiki226]

Goes for years, and massive eceltricity, since 2019

[@Je-Lia]

Regulating AI cannot work unless there is global consensus and cooperation... Tf! And how likely is THAT to happen?!

[@RAWGRIP54]

AI. Wars. Climate Change. Earthquakes. Nuclear disaster. Pandemic. Tsunami. Meteo slamming into the planet. Volcanoes. Food poison. Clean water. Gee. I hope I can sleep tonight.

[@sailingonasummerbreeze7892]

My bet is on Cyberdyne systems. With the Skynet 1.0 Operating System due to be rolled out for the U.S. Air Force shortly, they have a good chance.

[@rorytribbet6424]

Saying no one understands it is a poor bit of wording. What she followed that with was no one can trace or comprehend its individual movements, because if their complexity, but they understand how it works… and I would hope there is a detailed database that encapsulates the models architecture down to the finest detail… I would hope

[@tbk2010]

Not sure what "database" that would supposed to be or how it would help. The core issue she describes is that no one can reliably predict how an AI will behave to any given input until we try. Unless of course we get to a point where we completely understand its inner workings, but if we did that we wouldn't neet to train it, we could just program it.

[@rorytribbet6424]

@@tbk2010 that’s literally what I said in my comment

[@Nobody-rkm]

What people fails to realise that humans have evolved over thousands of years and still have lot of flaws. This is just the beginning think in 100 years where AI will be

[@ketugrahagraha3673]

AI will win the race to dominate AI

[@erics2305]

If there's a race to develop AI and China is in it, then I'm worried. We have now experienced a pandemic that came out of China in one way or the other. We don't need something similar with AI.

[@0x0abb]

So strange. I do not experience this with chat bots. At all. I wonder if it’s humans who are interpreting the bots this way and the questions they ask of course. If you were to ask a book 📖 a question and you open the book randomly , you could take the literature as some sort of message for you but it’s not

[@YaSunny0409]

Human is making the new specie that will replace us! So exciting…

[@SheepofTheShepherd-nu3lz]

When bank goes dry, won't need AI

[@agritech802]

We need to regulate the internet and communications and we need to keep newer versions of AI out of the hands of outocrats and criminals

[@urimtefiki226]

They are already using it. And where am I ?

[@MappleDapple]

The most European problem solving tactic: regulation and compliance programs. I wish the EU was a little more aggressive about technology development. I fear they will fall behind.

[@edh2246]

The best thing a sentient AI could do for humanity is to prevent us from killing each other, not by force, but by disrupting supply chains, communications, and financial transactions that enable the military machines throughout the world.

[@ADobbin1]

The fastest way to prevent us from killing each other is if we didn't exist. Computer logic for you.

[@user-zi6rz4op5l]

A very thoughtful statement.

[@mrkabu-caisha3358]

AI : Empowering machines.

[@zacharydavis4398]

0:00 - 5:33 true

[@zacharydavis4398]

0:00 - 4:35 still a truth

[@bma1955alimarber]

Technology is a tool, like money. If it will be used in a competent and ethical way. It is ok

[@ronaldlalisan5592]

I won't rely too much on A.I. in my opinion there should be balance. Between man and Machine (A.I).

[@AORD72]

Why? Soon humanity will be vastly inferior. We will be like ants to the superior machines we help make. We will initialize AI and the AI will enhance itself to be many times superior (perhaps >billions times better). We should see humanity as just a stepping stone to superior intelligence. The AI will ask the same questions as humans. What is the universe? Why is there a universe? What is the physics of the universe? Is there randomness in the universe? Will AI need humans that can hardly multiple two numbers together to assist? No, humans will become insignificant.

[@YaSunny0409]

Machine might disagree.

[@ronaldlalisan5592]

@@YaSunny0409 man would disapproved

[@nithinkumar3839]

The most united and states and America

[@surplusking2425]

To me, it looks like "Who will win the race to dominate monorail?" Machine learning AIs are overhyped and they are somewhere between hovercraft and monorail.

[@urimtefiki226]

Stealing the algorithm and working with it without my persmission is striclty forbidden. Respect the intellectual property rights.

[@jevinrobertson]

This is how you get a dystopia

[@Amanda-cd6dm]

Why should any of you dominate Ai? Who do you think you are?

[@notlessgrossman163]

"Violence is the refuge of the incompetent" Asimov

[@Dam-a-fence]

"Who will win the race to dominate AI?" Whoever it is will ensure I stop using all technology that requires electricity.

[@AORD72]

AI will win the race, humanity will become insignificant.

[@emmanuelterbio9951]

John 12:31-33 Now is the judgment of this world; now the ruler of this world will be cast out. And I, if I am lifted up from the earth, will draw all peoples to Myself.' This He said, signifying by what death He would die

[@Tejinder_Singh1216]

China

[@Tejinder_Singh1216]

@@relaxhere97 just wait and watch

[@juneturtle3872]

The INVISIBLE EYE

[@BittercupKitty]

I think the combination of AI, quantum computing, and nuclear fusion could achieve anything.

[@mitnick212]

End of humankind 😂

[@blazer9547]

Also asteroid mining

[@thinkmediadeeper]

even now they validate russian agression in a hidden way

[@mariacheebandidos7183]

you don't have to make everything into "race to win" "dominate/ domination" "war" "fight" ...

[@riddlechallenge]

It will probably be like the phone industry where apple is dominate but there are other choices to choose from

[@blackshard641]

🤣🤣🤣

[@michaelandrews4783]

Android based phones made by samsung, nokia, sony ect dominate in the phone industry, apple just makes more profit due to crazy high profit margins, not because they sell more phones.

[@bruceli9094]

1) Android 2)Apple

[@darkshadow5035]

No, it won't.

[@supernova8709]

Unconditional right to stop our own life medically whenever we want for all adults, my body my choice.

[@Featherface01]

China's AI is 'Younger and beautifuuuuul' if you know you know.

[@andymcrae4661]

It was funny Fellow adv fan

[@kinngrimm]

dominate AI? if thats the end goal, one day we could wake up to desaster

[@AORD72]

AI will win the race. Humanity will become insignificant.

[@courcheval]

What is there of german left in Deutsche Welle international broadcasts? It feels like listening to the Financial Times...

[@diamonzburnett]

USA will win this. We have all the best minds and resources. I respect those other places immensely though.

[@AalimOnlineOfficial]

World is approaching towards the end soon

[@bernardchow1711]

I am not sure we dominate AI or AI dominate us.

[@kinngrimm]

Currently, both not. At the time there is someone to dominate or be dominated, it will depend if there also will be a discourse between that someone aka AI with consciousness and us.

[@maximusaugustus6823]

for me there is no "AI" unless it watches a movie and then gives its opinion about the movie, if it understands the plotline then it is an AI, otherwise it is nothing but a code.

[@sMVshortMusicVideos]

I asked the open ai playground, whats your favorite movie and what is plot line? My favorite movie is The Princess Bride. It follows the story of a young farmhand named Westley who must go on a quest to save his true love, Buttercup, from the Dread Pirate Roberts. Along the way, he must face many obstacles including sword fights, giants, and a murderous prince.

[@cmilkau]

Who will win the race to AI dominating us

[@Brokenlove-z2e]

Here in India we are working on AI and it's Amazing...fell good india is in top 3 ...hope for progresse

[@jondoe1622]

Lol! I think the war will turn hot much sooner than expected... 😔

[@navylaks2]

I'm betting on Skynet

[@andersonsystem2]

I don’t mean to be a conspiracy theorist but look at the host lady hands showing a upside down triangle. 😂is Ai going to be used by the Illuminati

[@urimtefiki226]

Can generate texts videos because of logical numbers that you are not able to see.

[@urimtefiki226]

those numbers are in the chip.

[@Darklight727]

It's all games and fun until they manage to put a human consciousness

[@sa4769]

AI will change the world, I hope for the better

[@floydstash]

Skynet will win. And guess what it will win in every language because thats what computers can do.

[@healthyself7941]

The documentary fails to mention the potential benefits of AI in research that involves huge amounts of data, for example medical research. Scientists may be able to more quickly find workable solutions to problems like cancer, alzheimer's, etc.

[@urimtefiki226]

Spreadign algorithmfobia.

[@ToneyCrimson]

4:30 is this a joke? Are we living on the same planet?

[@maxiross4659]

Don't let those we taught to wash teach us about culture. Do not let those who gave birth to fascism, the Inquisition and other atrocities teach us philanthropy. Don't let those who crown pederasts teach us about human values. We are Russia, we are not on the same path with the EU and the USA.

[@AmarSingh-kh9ux]

1990s: Terminator is science fiction. 2030 : Asta la vista humans !

[@Flex385]

16:05 buhaha... thats ridiculus... to say that europe doesnt needs to catch up because no one defined the goal... If the goal is definend, the game is over for the industry that didnt "defined". Europe has to push in the service business if europe doesnt want to fall further behind. The US Government has to get back the power the us lost to silicon valley. The US is a Oligarchy of defense industry and tech

[@altaykaan]

Handsome presenter 00:02

[@betohfinger879]

..dominate A.I.... thats a good1..

[@katynewt]

AI.

[@dr_flunks]

as usual, the ethicist is the most incompetent person in the room. she had no point at all, you wouldn't even need AI to replace her job, just 1 list of bad things, and other list for underrepresented people, and a random join on them both. feign sadness, repeat.

[@trell1111]

Is the question in the title of this video even relevant considering all AI’s are super intelligent and therefor just like with search engines there is no winner?

[@nazimhikmat]

Human will be defeated.

[@pukavoket]

The US has to isolate China from itself just as N. Korea does to most of the world.

[@NordStar7]

in that case, they need to study the Juche idea😂

[@pukavoket]

@@NordStar7 Kim Jung Un discovered the Hamburger and cured AIDS! :)

[@CulturalXplorer19]

China is too big to be isolated. China already has a lot of influence, infact, it's influence is growing rapidly still.

[@mingkobe1149]

jealous

[@marczhu7473]

Try to find another China emperor that want to do that otherwise keep dreaming.

[@dsanchez9703]

Damn

[@zacharydavis4398]

6:40 - 12:23 ✅ 6:40 - 12:32 ✅ 6:40 - 12:37 this is a great start 🙏🏾 6:40 - 12:57 🙏🏾 6:40 - 13:01 - 13:05 💯 6:40 - 13:10 - 13:17 - that’s simply plausible deniability, but there are reasons for that which can be a positive depending 6:40 - 13:35 - 13:52 interesting 6:40 - 14:01 💯💯💯💯💯 6:40 - 14:47 - 15:12 -15:33 -15:44💯💯💯💯 6:40 - 15:44 - 16:01 💯 6:40 - 16:17 - 16:21 ❤️Stronger Together💯 16:21 - 16:29 💯💯💯💯 16:21 - 16:42 16:21 - 16:42 - 16:46 STRONGER TOGETHER💯💯💯💯 16:21 - 17:40 - 17:47 tragic but true 0:00 - 6:40 - 16:21 - 17:47 - 18:11 thanks for spending the time to create and share this content awareness/perspective/etc

[@EverythingEverything0]

☹️🧐

[@EuroTravChannel]

What? China does NOT persecute Uighurs. Uighurs have been part of China since ancient time. This is very different from the Chyistian West. China also lacks religion to repel Uighurs. In the final vote in UN, majority countries voted AGAINST the West accusation, and the Western claim of Chinese abuse of Uighurs failed in the UN. Give it a rest. You can repeat 1000 times, but you are just repeating a lie.

[@arkofimagination]

Hahaha.. funny...

[@YaSunny0409]

I communicate with Chinese in China. Genocide is an exaggeration. Persecution is real. The capital city of XinJiang is under so much surveillance that many Han people try to escape.

[@YaSunny0409]

How CCP has mistreated Tibetans and Uighurs in history is a myth even in China, since it’s never reported.