I worked in the industry at that time and remember the announcement in 2003. It was stunning, really, because so much effort and money had been poured in by many, many organizations. Thankfully, some clever folks figured out that (highly-purified) water was a viable alternative when supplied in the right location. And then a slew of ever-amazing innovations to extend the performance of sub-wavelength patterning with 193 light. It's one of the underappreciated success stories of the last 50 years.
@raylopez992 жыл бұрын
Sh!t happens. Same thing happened in programming when Microsoft threw Silverlight under the bus. Such a nice clean language (speaking as an amateur coder, it was never my day job). But the programming language pivot was not due to technical factors, more like popularity factors (the anti-MSFT crowd liked HTML5 and other such dirty languages).
@hansmuller36762 жыл бұрын
My collegue was in the taskforce to develop immersion objective within months and they did a Great Job !
@arthas6402 жыл бұрын
I barely understand the science or the tech but I heard a bit about that since the city i lived in was basically a Microsoft suburb at the time.
@botfeeder2 жыл бұрын
I didn't pay attention what was going on in semis for a number of years but when I looked into it at some point down the road I was astounded to learn that they were still using 193 to produce stuff with features way smaller than that wavelength. Some really smart optical engineers.
@FenrirRobu Жыл бұрын
@@raylopez99 that is just straight incorrect
@121Zales2 жыл бұрын
I love the combination of professionally produced content, high level engineering/historical information, and dank memes
@bakedbeings2 жыл бұрын
Dank nanomemes
@rkan22 жыл бұрын
We need a 2nd channel of Jon's called Danknometry
@StefanReich2 жыл бұрын
True. Laughed so hard at 10:05
@Grak702 жыл бұрын
Fun story: the first full field functioning scanner ever made for 157 was manufactured by SVG (later acquired by ASML for their catadioptric lens designs). At the time, it was thought the entire lens train, including the condenser optics, would need to be made from ultra-pure calcium fluoride. It was later discovered that fluorine doped quartz would do the trick for all but the few final lens elements. At the time, that one scanner contained the largest concentration of lithography suitable CaF2 in existence. The projection lens was literally worth its weight in gold.
@sooocheesy2 жыл бұрын
I heard CaF2 had issues with thermal expansion as well as the problem with birefringence, both of which caused unacceptable image resolution. Not to mention that it's fragile, difficult to polish and expensive as hell. I've worked with it plenty on excimer laser optics (nearly all the light source optics are CaF2) and it really an order of magnitude harder to get right than SiO2 optics.
@rkan22 жыл бұрын
Considering gold's price back then... probably worth more than its weight in gold!
@Grak702 жыл бұрын
@@sooocheesy very true. It’s much more difficult to make a large piece of CaF2 with uniform optical properties than fused silica/quartz. As such, high NA optics were always going to be a problem.
@uiopuiop34722 жыл бұрын
im use caf2 for my diy lihograpfy maschine. right has problems but first. its good
@tristanwegner2 жыл бұрын
8:16 I am grateful for the text saying when a picture does NOT show what is talked about, and is just a general cool image. Too many other channels are very imprecise with that.
@mbhinkle2 жыл бұрын
Don't know how you got in my feed awhile back young man but those algorithms and functions really "know" me. Great work.
@dansands81402 жыл бұрын
Oh you have no idea. I had a phone conversation with a friend about the mathematics of baseball scoring. I have never had anything to do with baseball in my life. The next day, my Windows taskbar had baseball scores for the first time.
@RameshChhugani2 жыл бұрын
@@dansands8140 it's happening. It's begun. U have an Alexa, irrespective of whether u buy or don't, all apps are listening...watching...monitoring...locating....running statistics, classifying...ranking.....
@honderdzeventien2 жыл бұрын
Isn't it this the best-one-yet?
@honderdzeventien2 жыл бұрын
@@dansands8140 so when did you last talk about integrated circuits with this person?
@DaxVJacobson2 жыл бұрын
Don't talk about how you get on the lists or they'll put you on the other list, the bad list.
@zeroredblade2 жыл бұрын
@6:33 is that a Gurren Lagann reference? A man of culture!
@mrembeh1848 Жыл бұрын
Amazing video, as always! Slight correction, the laser often not in the exposure tool, especially for EUV machines, but comes from the floor below. Also : these numbers, like 111, 110, etc. are not an ASML invention, but so-called Miller indices
@softballm19912 жыл бұрын
I love this video, I worked in the industry but cannot explain the technology. I have just sent to video to 6 associates who are always asking questions. Great Job.
@peterparsons7141 Жыл бұрын
Your work on these video’s is excellent. The information is presented in a very well thought out way. The beauty of these video’s is that it allows me to stop the video, and go and do a little reading about any of the details and then resume the presentation with a basic understanding of any pertinent detailed information. Your video’s allow me to have a good general understanding of complex systems. I have watched several of your video’s, they are very well done. Good work!
@markhonea24612 жыл бұрын
At some time in the past much of this process was highly guarded secrets right ? I have been wondering about the 'how' and 'what' for a long time, but only lately has this channel helped me to understand it.👍 thanks
@HouseOfFunQM2 жыл бұрын
>1999, the year of the Dreamcast Asian deer man, you are amazing haha
@botfeeder2 жыл бұрын
They don't mention a key player in 157nm which was Silicon Valley Group. I bought some of their stock back in the day, figuring being a maker of the leading-edge photolithography equipment could result in the stock going way up. Instead, 157nm floundered. SVG was eventually bought out by ASML, and I actually still made money on the stock, but it wasn't of course the motherlode that I had hoped it might be.
@justin58032 жыл бұрын
I've been to that bridge from 193nm to EUV. It is in Kaohsiung at the Pagodas.
@AlexanderSylchuk2 жыл бұрын
9:47 "The natural existence of barium fluoride was predicted by Michael Fleischer in 1970. Later in the same year, the mineral was discovered by Arthur S. Radtke and named after Frank W. Dickson (born 1922), professor of Geochemistry at Stanford University in recognition of his contributions to geology and geochemistry of low-temperature ore deposits".
@o73venky2 жыл бұрын
EUV is technically still optical lithography, however is reflective rather than refractive method of lithography. (It's still photons, just close to soft x rays) i.e 193 is refractive the lens refract light to get the pattern on the wafer. EUV reflects light to get the pattern in the wafer.
@ShadowKiller712 жыл бұрын
i was about to ask why would EUV process not be considered optical lithography anymore. i guess it was just a small mistake in the vid
@melgross2 жыл бұрын
They didn’t lose hundreds of millions on 157, they collectively lost billions. And it didn’t seem as though EUV would ever be ready. There was one setback after another.
@jimstewart3362 жыл бұрын
I would add the US contributions of ETEC and Varian Extrion during the early 80's. Both companies manufactured and delivered E-beam lithography machines, both to all of the US semiconductor companies and also to Hitachi, NEC, Oki and Mitsubishi. Those E-beam machines were used mostly for writhing high quality reticules for step-and-repeat and masks for contact printing. The machines could also direct-write on wafers, but that capibility was rarely used. Masks produced by the machines were used to produce the high density (of that era) Dee-RAM (correct pronunciation of DRAM) that got Japan on the map as a state-of-the-art semiconductor player. These machines were based on the Bell Laboratories EBES machine. Bell Labs licensed the design to both companies and they took the design from a laboratory prototype to production machines.
@Ivan-pr7ku2 жыл бұрын
The steady lithography progress during the 90s convinced Intel to go with the radical NetBurst architecture with the projection of 10GHz target, following the Moore's Law. As alluded in the video, by 2003~2004 the illusion fell apart and the 90nm Prescott was the coal mine canary that the semiconductor industry had to cool down and plans be re-evaluated.
@chrimony2 жыл бұрын
Over 20 years later, I'm still waiting for my 10GHz machine :(
@HermanWillems2 жыл бұрын
@@chrimony but we casually have 16 to 128 cores in our pc's now.
@2beJT2 жыл бұрын
1999 Year of the Dreamcast... I'm going to always say that now when referring to 1999.
@andersjjensen2 жыл бұрын
1999.. The year: The Matrix came out along with Fight Club and Pulp Fiction Napster was first released SpongeBob SquarePants aired for the first time Putin became president of Russia and invaded Chechnya Uh... I think 1999 was the year where the timeline fucked up...
@rkan22 жыл бұрын
@@andersjjensen It was because people celebrated the new millenia in 2000 lol!!
@hammerheadcorvette42 жыл бұрын
@@andersjjensen Well, the Dreamcast was also a fuckup. . .So yeah?! 1999 was the year of the fuckup. Y2K computer discs and all.
@talibong95182 жыл бұрын
Except the Dreamcast was released in '98. '99 was the year of the PS2.
@2beJT2 жыл бұрын
@@talibong9518 The world doesn't live in Japan. 9.9.99 was the magic date.
@harrykekgmail2 жыл бұрын
What a history! It's good to learn of the losers too. Just as much knowledge was acquired too.
@nexusyang48322 жыл бұрын
Early accesses. ;)
@pettahify2 жыл бұрын
@@ballsack4581 That's because he's a time traveller.
@washedtoohot2 жыл бұрын
@@ballsack4581 The people deserves to know!
@KomradZX19892 жыл бұрын
Man I love learned about niche stuff from you… And when it’s a niche failure, it’s just like icing on the cake! 🎂🎂🎂 10/10 as usual dude 😁👍👍
@OgbondSandvol2 жыл бұрын
It's always a pleasure watch yours videos, even if I don't have any personal interest in semiconductor fabrication, besides beeing a technology enthusiast.
@SchlossDW2 жыл бұрын
A similar thing happened to the effort to transition to 450mm wafers. And similar to 157nm lithography, the semiconductor equipment industry footed the bill.
@OnlyUseMezBladz2 жыл бұрын
Intel payed for it, ASML made it, and no one came
@Grak702 жыл бұрын
A lot of the reason 450mm died was the equipment folks NOT wanting to get screwed like they did with 300mm. They still got screwed on 450, but not as bad as if they’d gone all in.
@rkan22 жыл бұрын
@@Grak70 you mean nm? ;)
@andyyang52342 жыл бұрын
@@rkan2 Pretty sure mm is correct. They're talking about wafer diameters here. kzbin.info/www/bejne/ZqSYhYJvnZuZmdE
@Grak702 жыл бұрын
@@rkan2 ah…no? Lol
@rodolfonetto1182 жыл бұрын
Your channel is amazing! Soon I'll be pronouncing DRAM 'dram' instead of 'dee-ram' and find it natural!!! Keep up the good work - hugs from Brazil.
@orphidian112 жыл бұрын
6:34 somebody's piercing the heavens with their drill
@Alexander_Sannikov2 жыл бұрын
just for reference i wanted to mention that silicon dioxide/fused silica used to make lithography masks is also known as quartz
@janami-dharmam2 жыл бұрын
quartz is the name for the crystalline variety; there are two main types alpha and beta quartz. The glass type, fused silica is amorphous and is the material of choice because it is isotropic.
@mc88dx2 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@whollymindless2 жыл бұрын
It is amazing to see just how much cooperation is necessary between suppliers, vendors, manufacturers to make these things come to production.
@Jasx_5012 жыл бұрын
I appreciate the visual "examples" used during this video.
@vibrolax2 жыл бұрын
Exciting and terrifying times for us in the lithography optics business. So many tools and processes needed to be developed in parallel that performance, schedule, and cost risks were constant worries.
@andersjjensen2 жыл бұрын
Jesus we've been hanging in there with multipaterning for a long time. TSMC N7 is the last iteration that didn't use EUV. Even N6, which is only a 18% density increase over N7, uses EUV for the critical layers.
@HailAzathoth2 жыл бұрын
Yeah there's no point using euv for interconnect levels when 193i has high throughput, it's only really used for stuff like fin and gate definition.
@kasuha2 жыл бұрын
Exploring dead ends is necessary part of progress. Nobody really knew at the start if the technology will be viable. And they still invented many things on the way that became useful elsewhe.
@PedanticNo12 жыл бұрын
This channel missed an opportunity to be called Asian Memenometry.
@grizwoldphantasia50052 жыл бұрын
Amazing how something so boring is actually fascinating once you dig into the details. Thank you.
@LeleSocho2 жыл бұрын
Come for the lithography knowledge, stay for the Gurren Lagann jokes.
@scottfranco19622 жыл бұрын
Well good news and bad news, Joe. Good news is all the freaking money in the world is available for you complete this project. Bad news is everyone in the company is watching if you succeed, and nobody is even sure its possible. Good talk. Meeting at 11am.
@Deleurme2 жыл бұрын
Merci, c'est super intéressant : Je viens de m'abonner et je sens que je passer beaucoup, beaucoup de temps sur vos vidéos
@VicenteSchmitt2 жыл бұрын
Amazing to see the non linearity of progress
@alexanderschoenberger87312 жыл бұрын
great video! thanks for the insight. keep it up👍🏼
@agotti2 жыл бұрын
This video is one of the best learning videos I have seen in recent times! Thanks
@StevieCooper2 жыл бұрын
If I’ve learned anything from this channel it’s that “Simple Ultra-pure Water” is an oxymoron
@janami-dharmam2 жыл бұрын
water is not quite stable under UV, particularly if there is some dissolved O2 or CO2.
@MoraFermi2 жыл бұрын
These (100), (110), (111) numbers are crystallographic directions and specify how the crystal is cut relative to its unit cell.
@tulsatrash2 жыл бұрын
I like hell you put the introductory lines for the episode into the description.
@thomaswinston51422 жыл бұрын
This is great a very interesting and informative technology channel 😊
@guruG5092 жыл бұрын
A video on Universal Chip Interconnect would be great
@Fish-ub3wn2 жыл бұрын
damn, the quality of your vids is through the roof aaand you make meme wordplays. 10/10.
@jedermann052 жыл бұрын
“Oil Immersion” between the tip of the lens and the sample was long known in microscopy. I have wondered why it took so long to “discover” immersion (with water, not oil) for microlithography.
@Grak702 жыл бұрын
I assure you, stepper optics makers knew about immersion as a concept from the beginning. The problems were 1) why solve a bunch of novel engineering issues before you absolutely have to and 2) once you have solved them, how to convince fabs that having liquid in contact with their wafers during exposure wouldn’t cause killer defects.
@jedermann052 жыл бұрын
It was the customers who pushed for immersion in the 1980’s. For example, Burn J. Lin in Taiwan and Ghavam Shahidi at IBM. They were not the ones who had to be “convinced” to overcome inertia and redirect from 157 to immersion.
@soren60452 жыл бұрын
You move your microscope with 300mm/s? Immersion has to keep the water film intact and without any bubbles. The 1st commercial system the ASML 1700i failed by this issue.
@jedermann052 жыл бұрын
You mentioned that the light path had to be in an atmosphere of CO2 so oxygen would not absorb the light. This was challenging to do without too many changes to the base architecture. If too much CO2 leaked into the room, it could cause hypoxemia for people working around the machine. Everyone had to wear an oxygen alarm for personal safety.
@soren60452 жыл бұрын
Ok., but the used high toxic chemical (for example phosphin, metallorganics), the tons of sulphuric and hydrofluric acid or high explosives like silanes are not a problem?
@SIC66SIC662 жыл бұрын
I made that die shot of a Pentium II @ 5:05. Nice to see it in a video like this! :D
@patmelsen2 жыл бұрын
Nice shot! Do you upload them somewhere? I'd love to get one as a poster.
@TymexComputing2 жыл бұрын
The harddisk head flies as low as 10 nm over the bumpy plate... and here we care about 11-25nm of distortion :)
@florin6042 жыл бұрын
No
@TymexComputing2 жыл бұрын
@@florin604 Yes it is - Head Media Spacing in 1Tb/in^2 disks requires 10nm spacing, HAMR recording requires < 3nm of spacing :(
@soren60452 жыл бұрын
Sorry, but I have some of statements made in the video. The photoresist are usually less sensitive at shorter wavelength. So you have to enhance the sensitivity. Chemical amplified reisists were born. Thinning down the resist is simply driven by line width. You can‘t use 300nm resist thickness for 30nm lines. The lines will collapse during development by the high adhesion forces. This forces the industry to introduce new pattering processes with hardmasks. EUV was never on the table at that time. I saw the 1st lenses for EUV at Zeiss in 2005, when immersion was already in mass production. At that time 157nm was already dead. To call EUV not „optical“ is pure nonsense. 2 of your 3 points also apply to EUV.
@GerardHammond9 ай бұрын
You should start with the middle explanation section
@pirincri2 жыл бұрын
You're on fire dude!
@filipemecenas2 жыл бұрын
I love this channel , great work !!
@edwardblair40962 жыл бұрын
That was interesting, but left me wanting to know more about the new technology that the 157 nm was supposed to be the bridge to. Do you have a similar video describing the EUV technology? How is it different?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3_nm_process?wprov=sfla1 production of "3nm" is beginning, produced with EUV tech. "The term "3 nanometer" has no relation to any actual physical feature (such as gate length, metal pitch or gate pitch) of the transistors. According to the projections contained in the 2021 update of the International Roadmap for Devices and Systems published by IEEE Standards Association Industry Connection, a 3 nm node is expected to have a contacted gate pitch of 48 nanometers and a tightest metal pitch of 24 nanometers. However, in real world commercial practice, "3 nm" is used primarily as a marketing term by individual microchip manufacturers to refer to a new, improved generation of silicon semiconductor chips in terms of increased transistor density (i.e. a higher degree of miniaturization), increased speed and reduced power consumption, Moreover, there is no industry-wide agreement among different manufacturers about what numbers would define a 3 nm node. " - from article
@Grak702 жыл бұрын
State of the art production is TSMC 3nm and 5nm node and whatever Samsung is calling their equivalent node, I forget.
@bakedbeings2 жыл бұрын
As @@Grak70 said, the components are described as equivalent to 5nm gates (I think) in the old measurement, but yeah tsmc are firing *13.5nm* EUV light at the masks now, vs 157 😳
@arunaschlevickas3222 жыл бұрын
2:58 but you said that you would not bend to industry professional standard for spelling of ArF :(
@suncrafterspielt94792 жыл бұрын
Where do you get all this information from?
@scottfranco19622 жыл бұрын
Two short factoids: 1. IBM thought X ray lithography was the way to go and failed (ultrashort wavelengths). They may have just been to early. 2. How do they even know the next generation chips are even possible? Test chips can be created (slowly) by using scanning electron beams. Electrons have a really short wavelength. There is no mask used, each step on the chip is done by scanning it. Hence it is slow, but works for lab use.
@JorgetePanete2 жыл бұрын
too*
@ubulom762 жыл бұрын
Great summary, as always! But I miss your explanation on how you draw a line thinner than the point of your pencil.
@soren60452 жыл бұрын
Starting with a wrong similie is not helpfull to understand the limits of optical systems. You cannot write smaller lines than the pencils width, but this has nothing to do with optical lithography. There is the simple Abbes law. This explains all.
@HailAzathoth2 жыл бұрын
SADP bro look it up
@fxsrider2 жыл бұрын
Man you make some interesting videos.
@litmusaero96602 жыл бұрын
Another banger. I’d say here before a milly but if you keep pumping out these it might not be true by the time I comment 🚀🏆
@etherjoe5052 жыл бұрын
Fascinating 👍👍 Another great video 👍👍
@XmarkedSpot2 жыл бұрын
You've won me over. I'll be about here as long as you have something to tell about.
@geonerd2 жыл бұрын
Excellent as always. Thanks.
@sebastianwolfmayr2 жыл бұрын
It's not that ASML came up with 111 and 100 labels, these numbers are Miller indices. It's a very basic concept in crystallography.
@soren60452 жыл бұрын
Right and silicon wafers for example have a (001) surface and transistors are parallel to (110) or sometimes 45deg rotated (100) (quite common for technologies without SiGe strain technology).
@johnweiner2 жыл бұрын
@4:47, that image looks very much like chlorine gas, not fluorine gas, that, as I remember from my chemistry lab, is colorless. Chlorine gas has a yellowish hue, just like the image.
To summerrise, the photoresist was never found and 157 immersion fluid was not found either for after 157 waves.
@ashardalondragnipurake2 жыл бұрын
its weird they invested in something that was well know to be so temporary and a dead end just waiting a few years for a real road to progress and not wasting millions was just ignored as an option its as if tech demands progress without actually moving forward it seems so irrational
@COMATRON.2 жыл бұрын
can't await the next step (core 2 area when apple went x86 - i guess that was around that time)
@hugoboyce96482 жыл бұрын
Great video (and research)!
@nexusyang48322 жыл бұрын
So when is the 157 nm equivalent moment for EUV coming?
@varno2 жыл бұрын
It isn't, EUV is in production right now, and high NA is moving along, though there is no real reason to think that it will be possible to go lower wavelength than current EUV.
@thederpZOMBIES2 жыл бұрын
regarding mirrors, the use of molybdenum mirrors was also the norm.
@zouna0072 жыл бұрын
Great video!
@drwho94372 жыл бұрын
EUV is optical lithography. Mirrors and gratings are optics. 10 nm is still a photon...
@soren60452 жыл бұрын
Also x-ray or gamma ray consist of photons. Long wave „light“ like radio waves are less like a particle.
@atiessen2 жыл бұрын
Top video! Thank you very much. Greetings from Germany
@miklov2 жыл бұрын
Fascinating. Thank you!
@scionga2 жыл бұрын
As soon as he said 'the year of the dreamcast' I had to like the video instantly out of impulse
@MisFakapek2 жыл бұрын
Enjoyable. Even before watching it full.
@marcoasa902 жыл бұрын
One hundred is for sure an uncommon way to pronounce the one zero zero plane of a crystal
@HailAzathoth2 жыл бұрын
It's one oh oh bro 🤣
@maverick94092 жыл бұрын
What's your opinion on 3D stack CMOS?
@MostlyPennyCat Жыл бұрын
Everyone gangster until the flourine delivery truck arrives 😳
@jimbronson6872 жыл бұрын
in late 90s the switch from aluminum to copper was the big kahunah also.
@HailAzathoth2 жыл бұрын
Cmp tho
@aa-xn5hc2 жыл бұрын
Love these history videos
@technicallyme2 жыл бұрын
Out if curiosity but how when euv was the future did only one company wind to making the EUV lithography machines?
@chainingsolid2 жыл бұрын
Probly cause, it was so expensive it was better for the entire industry to invest in one consolidated effort, then spend x2 just to have a backup supplier.
@technicallyme2 жыл бұрын
@@chainingsolid I get that in theory but using,Intel as a recent example, couldn't one mistake or miscalculation hurt the whole industry?
@agsystems82202 жыл бұрын
Because it is really, really hard. Mirrors require much greater accuracy than lenses. The goal is for a particular path to have a distance a particular number of wavelengths so the phases line up. If a lens surface is wrong by 5nm and the wavelengths are 20nm and 18nm inside and out, then the phase is going to be wrong by about 2.5%. If a mirror is 5nm wrong then the phase is wrong by 50%, and light along this path interferes destructively instead. I expect China will get it working at some point, but for now each of the components are so crazy precise that there is nothing else that even comes close to the requirements. If one of those mirrors were blown up to be 500km across inaccuracies of the range of 1mm are be out of tolerance. That's comparable to the surface of neutron star in terms of smoothness.
@Grak702 жыл бұрын
Nikon tried, but they backed the wrong horse on EUV source technology (DPP vs LPP). That coupled with ASML’s patents on dual stage technology to augment the throughput requirements at the low wafer plane powers EUV started at and ASML’s strong partnership with Zeiss who were way ahead on the reflective optics pretty much doomed Nikon’s efforts. Canon, the only other major exposure tool maker, largely dropped off the map after dry ArF and never recovered.
@Grak702 жыл бұрын
@@agsystems8220 I’ll believe China will catch up on EUV after they’ve produced, say, a working KrF scanner.
@VioletPrism2 жыл бұрын
Love all your videos keep it up!
@goodfis6242 жыл бұрын
You specifically mention OPTICAL lithography, but is there any other? Like... electron/proton beam, etc?
@jamescaley99422 жыл бұрын
Electron beam is used for making masks. It has the highest resolution but is a serial process and slow. 157 is classed as optical though it is not actually "visible".
@goodfis6242 жыл бұрын
@@jamescaley9942 no, I mean he focuses on litography being optical, so I assume there are types of litography, which are they? Also, can you give me a hint how to google this process of making masks (or anything) with an electron beam? I know scanning microscope works like this, but I don't understand how electrons can move material, they're too light.
@soren60452 жыл бұрын
They „expose“ a resist. There is no removal of material by the electrons it self. Electrons are to light to displace an atom. You may heat up and evaporate material, but this is not very precious (at least for photomasks). You may use ions, but than it is a FIB tool. FIBs are BTW the workhorse in SEMI industry in the Failure Analysis labs to prepare SEM cross sections or TEM lamellas. Also a kind of revolution driven by the industry.
@J_X9992 жыл бұрын
Could you do a video on China semiconductor industry corruption crackdown. Seems like China is getting serious about semiconductor progress
@Hibbyhubby2 жыл бұрын
thanks for the amazing content as always
@runthejules9111 ай бұрын
"Year of the Dreamcast" respect.
@andysing722 жыл бұрын
Have you done a video on why high end masks are 4X and lower end stuff is 5X n 2X with regards to reticles?
@Grak702 жыл бұрын
Lower reticle demagnification reduces active write area on the mask, making defects easier to tolerate. 5x masks still exist at all because legacy equipment requires them. Canon for example used 5x reduction in its steppers, but left the advanced lithography market after dry ArF.
@andysing722 жыл бұрын
@@Grak70 Thanks , I did a search and found an article wherein 2000 there was a big agreement to transition to 5X from 4X , it never happen though and I never seen any "high end" 5X masks
@Grak702 жыл бұрын
I’d be interested to read that if you have a link handy.
@Kevin_Kennelly2 жыл бұрын
If you were to WILDLY SPECULATE.... what technologies could possibly lead to the next (beyond EUV) generation of ICs?
@Grak702 жыл бұрын
Gate-all-around (a finFET with the gate completely wrapped around the channel) is already planned by Samsung and TSMC. High-NA EUV is a beast so difficult it’s really more of a successor technology to today’s EUV. Beyond that, there’s not really any clear solution for further pattern scaling. EUV itself was a pipe dream for decades until it became a necessity. We don’t really even have a serious contender for pipe dreams at this point…
@HailAzathoth2 жыл бұрын
@@Grak70 euv will be the last litho technology because we will hit a hard wall with material/physical limitations before it is exhausted. A transistor with a 1nm gate (~6 atoms) will not work for Qmech reasons.
@EbonySaints2 жыл бұрын
6:33 Source: Toppan (Gurren Lagann) Look, I may have been hammered watching it, but I don't recall Kamina espousing the benefits of EUV Lithography to Simon or Yoko holding a lithography mask over her bikini during the show. I don't mind jokes, but make them obvious and not a part of something that someone might want to look up.
@miinyoo2 жыл бұрын
What a gnarly ride.
@agenericaccount39352 жыл бұрын
The year of the Dreamcast 🍥
@harmlymostless69252 жыл бұрын
@4:06 re - "Source: Trumpf" What?
@Gameboygenius2 жыл бұрын
Trumpf Group is a manufacturer of laser products used for semiconductor manufacturing. It's got nothing to do with Donald if that's what you were thinking.
@jedermann052 жыл бұрын
Trumpf is a German company that quietly does a lot of subcontracting for ASML. Not related to DJT.
@imeakdo72 жыл бұрын
Could china commerciallize 157nm, given that it's simpler than EUV but more capable than 193i?
@SchlossDW2 жыл бұрын
The real question is could China foot the bill to devlop 157nm lithography?
@imeakdo72 жыл бұрын
@@SchlossDW they probably can but on the other side semiconductor equipment manufacturers in china are underfunded, idk why the goverment could simply fund them
@Grak702 жыл бұрын
The bigger problem is that 157 is not simpler and wouldn’t really push very far beyond what can be done with KrF and phase shift masks. Even before 157 was de facto cancelled by Intel dropping its support, researchers were struggling to find resists transparent enough for decent patterning. And the search for high RI liquids transparent to 157 that would work for immersion was even less fruitful. Combined with CaF2 birefringence issues even the experts at the time struggled with, and I can’t see this ever being worthwhile or fruitful.
@Grak702 жыл бұрын
@@imeakdo7 this is an important caveat to anything China does to play catch up. Even their home grown stepper/scanner electromechanics aren’t up to snuff. China is still missing a great deal of basic know-how to even build a KrF scanner worth two farts, let alone try to solve 157’s problems.
@sooocheesy2 жыл бұрын
China hasn't successfully produced any 248nm lithography tools, let alone 193 or 157
@mike9417892 жыл бұрын
The dreamcast was a dream that was cast out of joy and wonder for you and me and society let it waste away.
@hebrewhammer10002 жыл бұрын
Awesome video. Thanks for sharing. It would be interesting to hear what you have to say about e beam lithography