Why 5G's Future Depends on Spectrum Access | WSJ

NOTE TO VIEWERS: In Chicago, Verizon download speeds reached a maximum above one gigabit per second, and median speeds in South Korea exceeded those in the U.S. The video above incorrectly says Chicago speeds maxed out above one gigabyte per second, and represents the median speeds in megabytes instead of megabits.
In the global race for 5G, U.S. telecom firms have a unique disadvantage: limited access to the “goldilocks” band of radio frequencies. That's pushing U.S. firms toward a less practical version of 5G. WSJ explains the science and its implications.
Illustration by Carlos Waters / The Wall Street Journal
More from the Wall Street Journal:
Visit WSJ.com: www.wsj.com
Visit the WSJ Video Center: wsj.com/video
On Facebook: / videos
On Twitter: / wsj
On Snapchat: on.wsj.com/2ratjSM
#WSJ #5G

[@kahchon87]

When 10G is launched, you need a wired mobile phone, because your phone has to stay close to the tower within 2cm, so might as well you plug your cable with your phone and the tower

[@Shamansdurx]

not a wire but an optic cable, you could also use directional lasers for high data transfers.

[@jadring1000]

Preach!

[@zaminhuseynov9201]

there will be diferent technology, data will come true light bulbs)

[@Rob_Dingemans]

@@Shamansdurxsuch product like Tera beam does already exist.

[@izralsei7617]

@Brian Testa Such lies

[@winstonalf]

Meanwhile huwawei in Switzerland rolled out 5g at a whopping 3.67GB per second. In many cities across Switzerland.

[@coffeeherbsandotherodditie6032]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/fZnPd6qMgteYsJY

[@fondren001]

@@coffeeherbsandotherodditie6032 It will be ok; We will figure it out after experimenting on the dumb conformist in the big cities

[@pepocopyright1020]

Switzerland stop 5g now 15 februari 2020 already. its not safe.

[@user-fg6xj2tq5q]

i cant wait

[@alexanderrahl482]

@@user-fg6xj2tq5q Witch King

[@trickdawg5521]

My takeaway from this is that the military is hogging up the available spectrum, thus giving China the advantage to beat us technologically then economically then militaryly.

[@slomo4672]

Underrated comment

[@christophernorton33]

Don,t worry about the headaches insomnia & increased risk of cancer just to mention a few of the benefits of 5G at least you will be able to download your favorite movie in no time .you may just live long enough to watch the credits at the end .

[@passionaddict9262]

Christopher Norton Well your the only other person in the comments that have some sense. This isn’t for faster downloads. This has health & privacy risks beyond what the public has any idea what it truly is. Take a look at this interview. kzbin.info/www/bejne/d3jOhmp-oqZ0d8U

[@angelicaorozcoo451]

Exactly!

[@izralsei7617]

You're wrong

[@izralsei7617]

@@passionaddict9262 and you're also wrong

[@CannabisTechLife]

Annnnnd that's why I haven't shelled out for an expensive 5G phone. Even in Chicago it would be spotty and 4G is fast enough for daily usage while we wait for 5G to actually grow to a usable front.

[@MatthewStinar]

Do I want to sit in the shade of this tree or do I want faster speed? 🤔

[@angelgjr1999]

5g is stupid. It can’t penetrate walls or even rain.

[@GODLOVEME-uj3vb]

Hahaha speaking like u already use 5G, maybe u ask trump to let China for u guys use 5G. Slowly grow 5G, China already make 6G. What have trump done so far nth ? U guys are the ppl who suffer LOL

[@anmolsingh1926]

I got my 5G phone on offer for the same price of the 4G model. When 5G comes to my house area, I'll shift to a 5G plan

[@sunnydaysddt2068]

@Samuel Carrington oxygen cause cancer as well, why don't you just stop breathing? Stop citing untrustworthy sources. If 5G. Is so dangerous, why doesn't US just let China have 5G? It would be nice for US, right ?

[@MatthewStinar]

1. Stop hiring people from anti-consumer oligopolists to run the FCC. 2. Eliminate spectrum auctions in favor of prioritizing public benefit. 3. Cancel spectrum monopolies controlled by corporations wherever communications technologies permit spectrum sharing. 4. Make the communications protocol development process open and public, permitting all the world's greatest minds to participate and regarding the public benefit as the principal constituent.

[@homania]

Apparently you do not understand the concept of 'capitalism'. 'Capitalism' is an authoritarian system of trade in a trickle up system of power and money. What you are describing when you talk about destroying monopolies and private control of rights or property is what they call 'socialism' and that's a naughty word in the western english language. Most/ Any policies that would directly benefit 'society' 'public benefit' is always fought tooth and nail by the large corporations, and their lobbying dollars > your freedom of speech and ideas any day of the week. You have to remember, while you and I cannot spend money we do not have, these large corporations and even our government pass their debt to the public, all to benefit their shareholders, politicians, and/ or donors. I'm not saying your ideas are not good nor valid, but in our current system of laissez-faire unfettered capitalism for private benefit, the ones with money (corporations) serve themselves before they serve the public.

[@BL-wu9jw]

@@homania Well said. The end result of capitalism is invariably the concentration of 90% of a nation's wealth in the hands of a handful of super rich persons. Such immense wealth buys limitless political power to perpetuate the vicious cycle. The ordinary folks are relegated to being worker ants to enrich the top.

[@MatthewStinar]

@@homania I've said nothing to indicate that I don't understand the concept of capitalism as you've described it. I'm not sure if I've somehow given you that impression or if you're just exuberant about your ideas.

[@MatthewStinar]

@@assmennfiossa See above.

[@MatthewStinar]

@@artisticendeavors5076 He was born in Buffalo, NY. I have no patience for your racism. Can we deport you instead?

[@chandanpuri2428]

Yeah, we should totally be selling more long term leases on spectrum to whoever is able to pay the most right now. That definitely doesn't support monopolies. It also definitely doesn't lead to the misuse of a public resource for private gain. Maybe we could allocate spectrum based on the greatest benefit to you know... citizens. And reallocate as often and be geographically specific as possible.

[@Palestineexists]

3:50 Ajit Pai, the same guy who struck down net neutrality 🙄

[@faith223]

Nuno Herdeiro still sucks lol The government is a bunch of corrupts

[@runningbastards6715]

He also made that terrible Harlem Shake vid

[@coffeeherbsandotherodditie6032]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/fZnPd6qMgteYsJY

[@trafficticketagent]

Ahit Pai, is a man that was given a position, which he could not achieve if he was NOT APPOINTED!

[@oskaveli662]

Net Neutrality would RGULATE the internet. The internet should be free of government intervention.

[@flyingblogger280]

Note they do not talk about the exposure/health issues. Europe is way ahead on the problem and knows communications system should be wired and grounded. How do those driveless cars protect the occupants from excessive levels of radiation? The people rolling these out on the public are sick sociopaths.

[@gusparaguss]

Yes, thank you! This is the first video on 5G that has acknowledged sub-millimeter wave 5G tech

[@3G4G5G]

We have been talking about it for years. We even made a video talking about non-mmWave 5G kzbin.info/www/bejne/gp7SeZd-eNifldU

[@MyIphoneGaming]

I don’t want 5G, not only does it give off so much Radiation that it literally boils the water in your skin and uses the EXACT same technology as the military’s “Active Denial System” which is literally a truck with a microwave ray gun on top that is used to microwave people up to 2 football fields away, it’s also going to be used as a Mass Government Surveillance System that will use large arrays of cameras, Long distance microphones which have already started appearing on lampposts in the uk, and those 5G Nodes that are going to be used as the Active Denial System, it just so happened that net neutrality was repealed and Apple integrated a government trust score system into iOS 12 and 13, mabey your phone will give that score to the government and if it gets too low, the towers will give you extra radiation to kill you off quicker, mabey you won’t be able to buy plane tickets or groceries which has already happened to a bunch of people in China, mabey if you walk into the property of a public park at night, you’ll be microwaves by the Active Denial System or if you don’t pay a parking ticket, the speakers on top of the 5G nodes will tell you to walk to the police station and turn yourself in or get microwaved. I don’t want to live in that dystopian world with an evil treasonous government where the average life span is 30 and the government takes away all of your rights to the point where your a slave to the system

[@liz-marie4224]

@@MyIphoneGaming massawakening.org/5g-depopulation-agenda/

[@thisisntsergio1352]

@@MyIphoneGaming evidence please to a non-3rd party site. Give me KZbin videos.

[@tubastud06]

Hey WSJ - Learn the difference between gigabit and gigabyte. 1.1 GigaBYTES per second is 8.8 GigaBITS per second. Internet speeds are rated in BITS per second; ISP measure how many bits per second they can send you.

[@a11danny]

True. Internet providers tend to market their services in bits. That's going to confuse many as they don't understand bits and bytes.

[@arnoldvaz3003]

LOL

[@Jmanyc123]

haha just commented this as well before I saw you mentioned it. Gonna send them an email now because they've inadvertently contributed to fake news since the report is listed in megabits not bytes.

[@GarryReyom]

It’s funny how certain radio frequencies are illegal to use even though access doesn’t cause any harm. This planet is a prison planet.

[@joshbennett376]

This may explain the trumpet sounds people were hearing.

[@cmdr1911]

I work in the oil and gas fields in OH, WV and PA. It is so rural out here. We just got 4G coverage in most areas. 5G is far from a selling point for me. It isn't where I need it to be and Wifi covers my house. What add the cost.

[@22EARTHDOG]

Going be interesting watching this turn into a lawyer's wet dream.

[@Yellow_Afryca]

Who cares, on the current bands when you hit your data cap your throttled to slower than what’s usable currently.

[@Aamie]

well obviously you have to pay for your data

[@faith223]

ATS_ they’re advertising as unlimited

[@timman3643]

Thats why I'm Glad the United States has unlimited data.

[@TheFourthWinchester]

@@timman3643 FUP

[@iseesaturnanderson2525]

Barrie Trower has good information.

[@seancashin1826]

This is like the least of 5G's problems

[@ricardoelectronicsrepair]

in my place Indonesia, there is no military or science demand on midband, so mid band 5g is possible but not expected to come before 2025.

[@johnblisniuk4479]

Yeppie! I live in Australia haha... Hope to get into the Tron mainframe one day.

[@jameszhou162]

The issue was discussed 3 years ago as US military clogged most high and medium bands and refused to move out of them. Commercial uses took a back seat. So rollout of current 5G radio frequency is way too expensive and not making any sense

[@RoundupResistance]

Based on available information, T-Mobile USA would most likely be the first to make 5G mainstream i.e. establish services on frequency bands below 1 GHz; one thing carriers can do is phase out 2G and 3G services to make room for 5G services (but you have to watch out for special applications using 2G/3G).

[@7wingsaseagles89]

Largest problem with using the higher frequency bands is rain fade. Rain fade is caused because the frequency wavelength is so short that a raindrop in the air can actually shorts it out. The US military submarines use what they call extra low-frequency to transmit information or elf these frequencies are that long that even if the submarine is submerged underwater it can still receive radio Transmissions. This comes at a price because it is an extremely slow transmission speed.

[@Jmanyc123]

WSJ- the Rootmetics report lists speeds in Megabits per second! A Megabit is 1/8 the size of a megabyte.

[@jameskapellas2241]

No mention of the very possible health dangers and intrusion into our privacy (

[@iceman9109]

Tmobile won’t have to wait if they are allowed to merge with sprint. They’ll have access low and mid band spectrum immediately and roll out high band.

[@devilorchard]

one of the advantage of 5g is faster internet speed and lower latency. latency being taken as advantage 4g has around 80-90ms.. 5g is 2-4ms. besides this there is no advantage. also having tower ever few meter is high in maintainace and expensive to install. i cant even get decent 4g everywhere.

[@rafajrichard]

Where do you get 90ms on 4G? I get 30ms pings on 4G AT WORST.

[@DanielQRT]

That's not how latency works at all

[@islantay5795]

@Samuel Carrington Shut up. You should even stop using your phone. Cuz its bad for your health.

[@zaminhuseynov9201]

DAta should be extenden by using light bulbs

[@user-zh4bx6kw7z]

the number of 4g base stations in China is 10 times of US. Before 5g, US should care more about 4g. Basically, the US tech advantage, if there is, does not benifit its normal or poor people.

[@janesimmons1861]

a military weapon;they would have you believe it's just more of the same.

[@jwillisbarrie]

Thanks for having actual captions for the Deaf

[@GarryReyom]

Why use 5G when public wifi nodes would be better and faster?

[@pengfei1394]

Disabling Huawei will make the US 5G construction cost several times higher.

[@safdar7]

Amazing video very informative

[@wyattb3138]

Meanwhile 4G isn’t available in my area.

[@coffeeherbsandotherodditie6032]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/fZnPd6qMgteYsJY

[@hullopillow4853]

China realised that at least as far back as 5 years ago.

[@evilsatorii]

@0:30 lol T-mobile 5G max 257 Mb/s in US, with T-mobile in EU we can get already 250-300 Mb/s with 4G/LTE in some cities

[@user-lv1wn5wq7n]

what is jio doing in hindia to put competetors at a loss?

[@msalem6069]

actually this have another disadvantage, the speed will be great but the communication will not be reliable, as the high frequency bands don't provide reliable communication (the bit error rate will be high). Therefore, low latency communication can be achieved in low and mid bands , but not in the high bands.

[@ramsesrameez5430]

G will not allowed rename it with R means 5R or 6R

[@CyberQuickYT]

Why don't DoD let operators take everything while maintaining contracts with them (like a requirement in auction) so they will still have access to it?

[@hindustanibhau6792]

Grate information

[@swordfish00007]

Extremely dangerous with zero long term safety studies done.

[@izralsei7617]

We don't need testing. We already know what it is

[@chuco915C]

Well that sucks

[@owlright]

Meanwhile in my country some area still haven't covered by 2G.

[@xm2895]

I tough he referred to Spectrum, the carrier

[@tedboggs4569]

I think you mean Megabits and Gigabits, not Megabytes and Gigabytes. 1 Gigabyte=800Gigabits. You won't see those speeds over wired connections for years now, and wired connections are generally required to provide the backhaul from the tower to the rest of the providers' networks.

[@3G4G5G]

Not sure if all your facts are necessarily correct, especially you don't talk about the large bandwidths that mmWave provide and is directly responsible for increase in speeds. Again, Sprint has a wide bandwidth in 2.5 GHz that it's banking on for speeds. South Korea, along with a good chunk of mid-band has large amounts (800 MHz) of mmWave spectrum that it's hoping will help it reach super fast speeds.

[@mueffe1357]

So is this why some US telecom used 5G term on a 4G? platform? Like LTE is supposedly akin to 4G.

[@linas2536]

Poor yankees.

Those numbers don't look right. Did you mean Giga- and MegaBITS per second? I don't think anyone achieved 1.1 MB/s = 8.8 Mb/s over radio yet. Also it is customary to refer to bits per second not bytes per second when discussing network throughout.

[@user-mh1qu7tu3p]

Huawei had started 6G network research about 3 months ago

[@andrewwhite1065]

Will take the frequencies from 300Ghz into the Tera-Hetz range which is even more of a concern. 6g research and testing has been happening outside of China for some time ... Huawei is not the first.

[@AzanAli-]

I can't even get 3 4G signals in the UK. And they say *We are building the fastest 5G in the UK*

[@jan-peterschuring88]

America builds a strong military to help bring itself into obsolescence.

[@katearmstrong7886]

Research 5G. God help us.

[@fredricful]

EEG EKG skanning? Seifty?

[@biggiesmol]

It's like winning the mobile speed race is like winning the nuclear arms race now

[@TheOisannNetwork]

What device can receive 8.8 gigabits wirelessly?

[@rick8053]

TheOisannNetwork i’m assuming they meant 1.1 gigabits rather than 1.1 gigabytes

[@timman3643]

For the US that's why TMO and Sprint need to merge. TMobiles B71 for coverage at 10x10 then all of Sprint B41 100-160 mhz of it.

[@coffeeherbsandotherodditie6032]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/fZnPd6qMgteYsJY IDIOT

[@volodumurkalunyak4651]

@@coffeeherbsandotherodditie6032 this is some freak complaining about mobile network operators having fences against "stop 5g" people messing with and destroing expensive hardware

[@laurismajors5502]

10g will bee 10 cm from the tower

[@rd9102]

Great video.

[@ramsesrameez5430]

These all will roll out do some research.

[@AusNetFan13]

Don't steal the frequencies from the C-Band. For cable and small dish subscribers, if the C-Band is sacrificed expect your bills to greatly increase.

[@AusNetFan13]

@@assmennfiossa Hi Anthony. Do you know where the small dish satellite companies get the cable channels? They receive them from C-Band.

[@michalisleonida9708]

People's OPEN YOUR EYES.

[@Ahead0fTime]

The question is, how does it effect the human body

[@nataliee5501]

massawakening.org/how-does-agenda-21-is-being-implemented-worldwide/ Within the website, there is a section dedicated to 5G..

[@innergx3]

The same way it has affected China...

[@jose162204]

It doesn't lol. Pick up a physics book...

[@rlee6052]

Doctors think 5g is unsafe ehtrust.org/scientists-and-doctors-demand-moratorium-on-5g-warning-of-health-effects/

[@fturriaf]

This video lacks on real insights about 5G deployments challenges and proposals

[@Wayne-Pr]

We are a large Regional, Rural & Remote Communications, Telecommunications & Telemetry company here in Aust. Our incumbent Telco ( Tel$tra) get any band it wants & it gets as much band as it wants. Australia's No.1 Telco ( Tel$tra ) & No. 2 Telco (Optu$) are currently rolling out 5G networks useing 3.6Ghz whilst it is "Generally" pretty fast its range is extremely limited onlu approx 500m's to 800m's from a tower / light pole & is regularly beaten by our 4GX network operating in the B28 700Mhz network. 5G in Australia is not capable of penetrating into buildings & the infrastructure (routers) to receive the 5G is exteremly limited so much so tuat both Tel$tra & Optu$ only have 1 x router each & the router does not work indoors. Netgear have been stopped from supplying a 5G router into Australia because they will not remove the external antenna ports thus allowing it to receuve 5G indoors via an external antenna so that it can be used indoors which the 2 x Telco$ frown 👹 on.

[@HighDef69]

Yeah. So I'll wait for the great 5G 'goldrush' before investing in a new 5G phone from Samsung. Learnt my lesson last gen with 4G and Sprint - I'm now with T-Mobile.

[@Marcus51090]

In the USA you mean

[@michaelbelonio3342]

3G (what I'm using) has slow data transfer but longer range, my younger brother has 4G LTE phone which has way better data transfer but has shorter range, so in that case if 5G were to be available in our country the Philippines, we have to be in close, very close distance to the cell site to experience the full potential of 5G. Bad tradeoff.

[@ma2i485]

Not true 5G is deployed in low band and mid band so you don't need to be close to the cell tower to get decent speeds. When you using 5G high band than you'll have to be close to a relay/node inorder to access gigabits per second connection. So 5G will be much flexible when all bands are 100% available

[@Appplethefruit]

Poor story.. don’t expect these from WSJ. Pls remember your reputation and dont get sold off.

[@harvbegal6868]

It's the most overhyped technology ever. 5G only works at capacity with high counts of fibers connecting to each 5G antenna. And those antennas can only be about 500 feet apart to use mmWaves. That kind of fiber infrastructure does not exist and building it out is slow and costly. They will build it out in metropolitan areas but if you live in small town America you are stuck with whatever you got now.

[@cocutou]

It's not overhyped because the Chinese are already onto 6G.

[@ruwiki]

the reason I skip this year's iPhone: the lack of 5G compatibility.

[@y2raza]

ruwiki 5G as currently setup to be in USA will have very limited coverage you literally have to live next to a 5G node to get any benefits. I don’t believe the carriers will invest $ in making 5G ubiquitous instead they will target pockets of areas such as arenas and busy downtown locations. And even then 5G is at least 3+ years from fully maturing in USA.

[@SM-ku3uo]

Why are you still using iPhone? Its so last century,. Use Huawei.

[@faith223]

S M Huawei uses android so it’s a big no for me

[@izralsei7617]

@@SM-ku3uo Huawei is made by the Chinese which china is known for surveillance and bootlegging so I think not

[@auro1986]

calling a better 4g service as 5g ?

[@ramsesrameez5430]

You want to test my speed Rameez here ??

[@dennisp8520]

Honestly, 5G doesn't make sense to me at the moment. The main benefits that it brings are only going to be applicable to urban markets. Urban markets already have access to great LTE and wifi. 5G is definitely needed for the future but this current implementation is not going to fair well for the US market as a whole because it is too constantly

[@steven3379]

At&t's 2g phones are no longer supported and that bandwidth will probably be repurposed for 5g...

[@f.puttstycker2784]

Towers? History repeating again!

[@mzamroni]

5G mmWave is getting near to the fate of MMS. It's fancy technology that is possible but not feasible

[@SetasMushrooms]

Technology and innovation can be good, but is 5G safe?

[@MatthewStinar]

Yes.

[@totolesquimau]

No

[@faith223]

Toto Lesquimau yes it is, don’t believe everything you see on the internet

[@kesstron1]

Nope

[@izralsei7617]

Yes it is, the fear of 5g causing lots of bad things was started by Russian trolls which you can literally look up. Take the bird killing for an example, it was a hoax

[@freecountryagain4712]

Paid promotion so it's only part of the story, the nice part....Ever wondered why our bills go up even after infrastructure is paid for.... think about toll roads.... When they proposed beltway 8 in Houston the public was told the toll fees were only to pay off the private investors and would then be ended, NOT!

[@Mr_Battlefield]

US Government don't need at that bandwidth. US has government satellites for a reason. Tell the government to go back to using Morse Code from a telegraph.

[@accumulator5734]

Please stop saying 5G will bring us full autonomous cars!!!! The only thing I want 5G doing for my autonomous car is updating the map, which 4G can already do. When u say 5G will usher in level 5 autonomous driving ur implying a computer hundreds of miles away will be driving ur car for u and if u get poor reception somewhere ur probably gonna die or ur car will pull over and stop. Tesla a leader in self driving tech and never have they ever said they need 5G cell service to make full self driving possible. I want decisions made by a powerful computer in the car with me.

[@GURken]

My question is: is there a need for that speed? I mean 4G is pretty enough for multimedia. What purpose requires 1Gb/s?

[@nicholasstarr6096]

Self driving cars

[@kagez6515]

We’ll eventually need 1Gb/s. Soon everyone will be transmitting 4K images and videos, and that will take up bandwidth. This will lower speeds for everyone and wont be 1Gb/s. This is the same with 4G. 4G has a theoretical maximum of 100mb/s, but can’t reach that with so many people using 4G. That means when most people can access 5G, the average speed will fall somewhere between 80-200mb/s, which will feel just like as it is now.

[@xiaxia686]

People said the same thing about 4G 5 years ago, now what?

[@dennisp8520]

It is not just a matter of raw bandwidth. The lower latency that 5G can provide is important for IoT devices and as others have meantioned self driving cars. The argument you are making is the same one that people made when we used 3G and we're transitioning to LTE. At the time 3G was sufficient. Smartphones and the things we did on them didn't require fast internet speeds. Yet, as time went on and infrastructure was built out for LTE new companies were made and devices became able to do more things. Basically what I'm getting at is that there are plenty of use cases that will require the extra speed that 5G brings that are not possible with current data limitations of LTE

[@xGen720]

Game streaming services, games download, 8k video etc...

[@wapworld5472]

Yay!! Ajit Pai!!! The pride of India!

[@a7temple]

This may be great for large commercial centers like big cities but even there it will be a slow build-out. I am not that excited about this. And then there's the constant surveillance state. Robot policemen are right around the corner, literally!

[@sonysonix]

But my at&t phone says I already have 5g :-(

[@sentientbeing05]

PewPewDie 5Ge is just 4G Advanced/4G+. AT&T is just misleading.

[@shugeluo735]

Now in my city 5G cost like 60£ per monthಠ_ಠ can't afford it

[@tabithaburnett1035]

Not safe

[@izralsei7617]

Kinda is.

[@abubardewa939]

Only time will tell. One thing is for sure, world will be totally different after this lockdown

[@andrewwhite1065]

'Li-Fi' the safe alternative to 5g.

[@kirstinetermansen2213]

What if criminels ,,,, uses am or f. M

[@jahjoeka]

We're not #1 again.... great...

[@ShadowBrok3r]

entitled sense of self worth you americans have...your not #1 at anything really besides longest country at perpetual war so sit down. or nuke me ROFL

[@ShadowBrok3r]

@CODE92818 delusional

[@ricchmus]

@CODE92818 septic tank!

[@dragondescendant1]

WSJ stole exclusive Huawei 5G technology to illustrate the report.

[@nzmanhdee6246]

This isn’t anything private

[@dragondescendant1]

@@nzmanhdee6246 sure is private, Huawei has hundreds of thousands of registered copyright patents.

[@GODLOVEME-uj3vb]

Hahaha probably is ur own nation screw u guys up. Probably tracking stole data against u guys and there Edward Snowden truly America. Really Huawei stealing LOL China already have bitcoin system on we chat and 5G

[@PradhumanRehal]

What exclusive Huawei 5g technology did WSJ exposed ?

[@adike5]

better and cheaper wifi is enough for most people.

[@adike5]

wifi is always better

[@davidcantor293]

I don’t like being charged to communicate with the world to begin with 😡

[@benchang1022]

By the time 5g is fully rolled out, we’ll have 6g.

[@winstonalf]

True.. Huwawei is already working on 6G

[@JohnSmith-hz7te]

*0:41** LG U+ HUAWEI*

[@mkien2005]

Huawei or the highway!

[@LoMio]

0:29 It's gigabit.. not gigabyte. Ugh. This video just lost all of its credibility.

[@ramsesrameez5430]

These are not really access full