The bishops range making it superior to knights is not new to experienced players, but explaining it this way is beautifully illustrative and really drives the point home. Great job.
@elindauer4 ай бұрын
This was interesting, thanks for sharing. Maybe you can back it up by showing how the bishop can so often outshine the knight in endings with pawns on both sides of the board, or maybe middlegame examples where the center is open so the knight can't find squares in the center while the bishops rain fire from the wings? Just food for thought, love your stuff as always.
@R.Akerman-oz1tf4 ай бұрын
The elementary diff is the colour. Bish remains; where Knts alternate. I like Ur suggestion though. Mid games) GM's might even sac a Bish. End games ?) that would be something.
@treblav4 ай бұрын
I really like the knight but the bishop has the ability to simulate a sniper, which makes him more advantageous for the checkmate.
@aidanwogan32024 ай бұрын
Glad you've been living your life, and excited to see my favorite, most instructive chess channel back on YT!
@planezero4 ай бұрын
Wonderful, came to hear an opinion on why a bishop might be preferred over a knight .. got a valuable lesson on attacking chess ❤
@IvyCatholic4 ай бұрын
Interesting . Thanks for the content Irina! Very underrated channel.
@connorregan91284 ай бұрын
The bishops are advisors, putting influence over the board and forcing weaknesses. Knights are your warriors, finding the weakness left behind and helping find the kill. Bishops have the time, and knights have harmony.
@AH-gk6qs4 ай бұрын
Thanks very much Irina. I was one of the people who asked this question about bishops v knights. Really appreciate the video
@Erik_0014 ай бұрын
Love your videos. Thanks again very much.
@comjag4 ай бұрын
Thanks Irina, hope you had a great holiday in Australia!
@kimgss14 ай бұрын
Thanks for the instructional videos, great teaching style
@pelicans4564 ай бұрын
great job with the lighting, looks really sharp!
@epicchess20214 ай бұрын
Love your videos thanks Irina and great to see you back!!
@sumnerhayes34114 ай бұрын
Excellent explanation, glad you're back!
@todesque3 ай бұрын
‘’Short and sweet.’’ Some unintentional humor there!
@calvinasu4 ай бұрын
Thank you! Was always confused about the bishop vs knight talks
@papatingle99644 ай бұрын
Hey! I'm so happy you haven't stopped uploading, was worried for a bit. Love the content, keep it up
@redareda66074 ай бұрын
very instructive , appreciate it !!
@matesenelinsti4 ай бұрын
Great content. A pleasure to have such a wonderful teacher. Thank you.
@Richard_Stroker4 ай бұрын
5:11 Holy hell!
@sandeepranga14 ай бұрын
It's a special move in chess lol 😉😂😂
@lucassantana69934 ай бұрын
always nice to watch your videos 😺 glad you're back
@Holzschieber4 ай бұрын
Actually, the 3 examples show how tremendously strong and devastating knights are when supported by the queen! Much stronger than bishops, usually.
@trent7974 ай бұрын
Great examples...very helpful!
@TheSimple1z4 ай бұрын
Thank you..🙏🥰 Welcome back...
@vnshngpnt4 ай бұрын
Great video! Good explanation.
@josephojemuyiwa89144 ай бұрын
hooray! glad you're back posting for then new year. Your content is golden
@coolcat234 ай бұрын
While it took the knight four moves, it was the star of the show in the first game. It prevented retaking on f6 and was the foundation for a checkmate threat, and the final checkmate (that did not materialise). In all games, the knights did the heavy lifting, while the bishops only removed pieces (which could have been accomplished with another kind of piece as well). According to the games chosen, the best use of bishops is to sacrifice them. :) I believe knights are fantastic, because their square coverage is unlike that of any other piece which means one can attack any piece (with the exception of another knight) without giving the attacked piece the option of removing the attacker. Furthermore, knights seem to be much more capable of creating forks, probably due to how other pieces tend to need to support each other. I don't think I've ever seen a bishop creating a fork but knights do or threaten it very frequently. Moreover, knights cannot be blocked by moving a piece between the knight and the attacked piece. A knight is therefore not only great at circumventing defensive walls and exploiting cramped positions, it is the only piece to deliver the fabulous smothered mate. Finally, bishops really suffer in endgames when one loses the bishop pair as half of the board is inaccessible for a single bishop. In contrast a single knight can reach any square of the board (granted, while taking its time to do so). For these reasons, I like knights a lot more than bishops. This is just an amateur's view, of course.
@62calum4 ай бұрын
I totally agree. It's funny how people see chess differently. None of that stuff happens without the knight. The bishop can pin you tho that's a really strong move.
@innopva99734 ай бұрын
BEST NEWS ever! new instructions and your content!!! but wow you had an amazing time that you needed so great!!!
@southron_d13494 ай бұрын
Glad you had a great holiday here in Australia.
@roqsteady52904 ай бұрын
Insightful lecture.
@hussnainjutt21844 ай бұрын
I anxiously waited for you to make any video, missed you and your videos 💞 Thank You Dear
@jackbar284 ай бұрын
One advantage knights have over bishops is its harder to predict their movements. Where could this knight be in 3 or 4 moves? That takes more time to calculate than a bishop. Im only ever blindsided by knights.
@lukastux30244 ай бұрын
Oh we've waited for a new video so desperately long!
@jonathanperez12124 ай бұрын
Just found this channel love it
@Amarjeet17914 ай бұрын
Lovely to see you back after soo long, thank you Irina
@iwill58104 ай бұрын
Love your content ❤
@joshuamphande22724 ай бұрын
Good to see you back!
@Carrinthe4 ай бұрын
Naturally cuddling 🐨 takes precedence above making chess videos, we understand. So glad to see you back though, you make the most instructive chess videos on KZbin. Although bishops are generally better than knights I'm always aware for chances getting a good knight vs a bad bishop, I really love playing these endgames.
@alirezacheraghi39654 ай бұрын
Happy to see you again on youtube😊
@user-bc6kn2mm4t4 ай бұрын
First lesson of the year! Let's go!!! 🎉🎉❤
@charlesdarwin1804 ай бұрын
Good lesson!
@davidrivera_20024 ай бұрын
Good you enjoyed your time in Australia. Great video, Irina :)
@diamondmeitei26574 ай бұрын
Very helpful
@StuffBudDuz4 ай бұрын
I like having a knight over a bishop in some end games. I like that it's the only piece that can jump over other pieces. A knight can sometimes penetrate a "fortress" when a bishop cannot. Speaking in generalities, however, I can see why people prefer knights over bishops.
@RicardGomes764 ай бұрын
Thank you Irina!
@anti_proton4 ай бұрын
The thumbnail says it all, Knights are the koalas of chess.
@chessthinker5004 ай бұрын
Nice to see your pretty face again. It feels so refreshing.❤😊
@karanaima4 ай бұрын
Thank you
@drumcircler4 ай бұрын
Welcome home, mate! Bh6 was extremely nasty!
@itsmemailingyou42343 ай бұрын
In the end game a bishop can wind up dominating a knight, a knight can never wind up dominating a bishop.
@MartinZanichelli3 ай бұрын
Any Catalan opening is a good example of a super powerful bishop in "g2". I play it with White.
@theowalcott1024 ай бұрын
Welcome back Irina! We missed you!
@CryptiqYT4 ай бұрын
Thanks
@ruthxk78444 ай бұрын
Why a bishop is better than a knight: "hey, let's sacrifice some of them😂"
@ruthxk78444 ай бұрын
Ps just joking of course. I loved the examples! I just didn't expect them to be sacrificed after stating they are so much better😂
@garyinternet54364 ай бұрын
Something I learned recently is that if you place a bishop on an empty chessboard it can get to any square of its designated color in no more than 2 moves.
@zsofi4974 ай бұрын
Really cool
@yukari_katsuragi4 ай бұрын
it's a bit of a truism that i fully agree with (800 but been playing regularly for a couple years) that I'd rather have a knight when there's lots of pieces and pawns obstructing the long movement but I'd rather have a bishop the board is open; and the more things get taken off the board, the more i like my bishops, so i almost never want to trade a bishop for a knight and treat doing so almost like a full piece sacrifice. I think that last game is a great example of this because the bishops played that vital role with the sacrifices but in the very cramped position it's the knights that actually played the checkmating role
@davidjames1494 ай бұрын
800 after playing regularly for years?
@yukari_katsuragi4 ай бұрын
@@davidjames149 yes, I'm naturally untalented i also wish i was less bad at chess but don't be rude
@michaelkugel20614 ай бұрын
Dang, wish I had known you were in Australia. Next time you could do some chess event?
@nileshw13684 ай бұрын
Very nice ! ✍️🎊👏😀
@executivelifehacks67474 ай бұрын
I get a kick out of how Irina doesn't tout the GM title on her channel (in her youtube channel name or handle) like most others do who have the title. It's like hey, I'm Irina Krush, you know who I am and this is why you're watching. Even though a GM title is greater than a number of lesser titles of content creators who created good content I also enjoy watching. I sometimes wonder if there's a material difference in what is taught at my low 1000s level depending on what level of Mastery the various demigods of chess have reached. In theory the higher you get to the better you should understand things however being able to convey things in a way that elevates people rapidly is another matter entirely.
@mohan94654 ай бұрын
could u please make a video on anand vs kamsky round 9 game from candidates tournament in 1995 which anand won
@thomasthetankengine84184 ай бұрын
Your back 😊
@mmathems3954 ай бұрын
I've seen players do wonderful things with knights, years ago, that I still haven't learnt to do, so, there are also some strong arguments in favour of the knights being superior.
@joseantoniomendes52114 ай бұрын
Walter Browne vs Arthur Bisguier US Championship 1974 14. Bh6 !!
@vladpetre56744 ай бұрын
What about in a B vs N (plus many/ few pawns) endgame?
@speed999-uj5kr4 ай бұрын
Did you lunch the wall 🧱 😅?!
@slylataupe42724 ай бұрын
Surf, scuba diving, etc… that’s an excuse we only accept once 😏. Thx for the return 😊
@jeffrey34984 ай бұрын
The Knight can do things no other piece can do, namely jump over other pieces. The Queen can do everything a Bishop can do, but a Queen can’t do what a Knight can do.
@sh3lton4 ай бұрын
I am not sure if you're open to suggestions but i love endgames videos
@steinanderson98494 ай бұрын
Hope you enjoyed Australia!
@glamdring274 ай бұрын
Interesting video, as ever, although I wonder if it really answered the question of a Bishop being *better* than a Knight when in each example it was the Knights who remained to win the game. The Bishops made their long range, 1-move flashy sacs, but those Knights, however long they took to get there, were the menaces 🤔 Still enjoyed the video and examples though, and they definitely showcased the idea of the Bishop's long-range advantage!
@avizmaldesigns31424 ай бұрын
The Bishops were put in the same rank as those filthy Knights from the royal guard, but they proved themselves over time and now the Kingdom recognizes their true value: *4*
@alveolate4 ай бұрын
next video: Why a knight is better than a bishop in chess pretty sure there are plenty of scenarios where a knight can be more valuable than a bishop, like a well-anchored knight vs a bishop blocked by opponent's pawn structure. bishops are also inherently blockable whereas knights can't be blocked, which allows knights to setup some checkmates that bishops can't.
@twentyrothmans73084 ай бұрын
I hope that you liked Australia, sorry that it was so hot. One of my opponents is very wily with his Knights, but after I've taken one with a Bishop, attacking feels lopsided. It's just poor play on my part. Love your content.
@CharlesWolfeSkate4 ай бұрын
❤
@Steve_K24 ай бұрын
Don't all three games show us the knight-queen attack is stronger than most defenses can handle?
@coolcat234 ай бұрын
I agree. While the bishops were great in terms of tempo, in principle their sacrifices could have been accomplished by other piece types as well, whereas the way the knights supported the queen to attack the opposite king could not be replicated by any other piece.
@joseantoniomendes52114 ай бұрын
K. Opocensky vs A. Alekhine Duras60 1942 23...Bh3 !!
@lourensnvanderheijden88534 ай бұрын
The Bishop is only strong in open games or half open. That's how i learned it😊 your examples were beautiful 👌😎
@kimgss14 ай бұрын
Worth mentioning the value of the Bishop pair against N v B. Bishops also perform better during endgames with pawns on both sides and while a N+N v K endgame is a draw, N+B v K is winning.
@Fccc3514 ай бұрын
snipers!
@Tletna4 ай бұрын
The knight is the only piece that can attack a king and or a queen with impunity. So, the knight foils the queen and also fills in gaps in defense. Your video really illustrates though how the knight and bishop work well as a team. So while I say the knight is a stronger piece you could argue that the queen and bishops allow the knights to shine and are much faster than the knights. So, in that sense maybe you're right but it is just hard to agree with any piece other than the queen being stronger than the knight. Yes, I think the knight is even stronger than the rook unless the board is wide open of course.
@jade_hare4 ай бұрын
Knight is good at preventing early Queen moves and defending it's own Queen. It's unblockable, yet Knight promotion is more common than bishop promotion despite lack of pieces by that point (largely due to stalemate prevention, though). Playing chess most of my life (only around 15yrs, since I was 4 lol), I've always loved the knight, and my view is that both bishops are better than both knights, but 1 knight is better than 1 bishop.
@cancer24454 ай бұрын
i will fight to the last knight but I can't say that about bishop.
@mister-86584 ай бұрын
1 bishop and one night are equivalent, however a bishop pair and a pair of knights are not.
@mister-86584 ай бұрын
Someone just liked this comment and I realized how lackadaisical it was. 2 bishops are able to checkmate an opposing king. However two knights are not compatible of doing so thus less valuable than the bishop pair.
@mister-86584 ай бұрын
The way my chest coach explained it when I was a kid. You need seven points of material to checkmate a king. You can achieve this with 2 knights and a pawn or a bishop pair. Making bishops worth 3.5.
@steelsteez61184 ай бұрын
Hi Irina. Heard you punched a hole through a wall. What a bad ass!!
@mattlambert31184 ай бұрын
I don't really think that illustrates why a bishop is better than a knight. You say it only takes the bishop one move, but you have to move a pawn to get a bishop out and you don't have to move a pawn to get a knight out.
@shaktidevii4 ай бұрын
💯🙏🏽🌞❤️
@thomasloos86754 ай бұрын
Because a bishop can travel the board quicker done
@mr._baum1534 ай бұрын
why there is a koala in the thumbnail
@swilliams1404 ай бұрын
Because of Koalas?
@kevinwellwrought20244 ай бұрын
A knight can be also better than a bishop, it all depends. In blitz knight is even better than bishop.
@vaccaphd23 күн бұрын
A knight may be better in closed positions, but, in general, a bishop is better.
@HongwareeChannel4 ай бұрын
A bishop is not better than a knight. It is the position that makes a bishop or a knight better or not.
@videofudge4 ай бұрын
And if more positions favour the bishop over the knight... The bishop is, generally speaking, better.
@HongwareeChannel4 ай бұрын
@@videofudge According to who or what book or serious study?...
@paule44 ай бұрын
What about the endings where the single bishop is the wrong color and can't attack or defend the pawns (it can only control half the squares on the board) whereas the knight can get to the whole board and capture the key pawn? What about the Sicilian structure where the White knight is dominating from d5 against Black's one remaining minor piece, the dark square bishop? Must be other examples too. Not quite so simple...
@briangunn214 ай бұрын
You are comparing the strengths of one to the weaknesses of the other
@dmaster20ify3 ай бұрын
I beg to differ that bishops are all that better than knights. And these examples didnt show why bishops are better. Its more like giving away your bishops so the knight can get maximized. Bishops have a range advantage. Knights can attack and defend every colour. Also knights are the only piece that can attack the queen without being attacked back. Also queen and knight pair are said to be better than queen and bishop pair more times. Another advantage of bishops over knights is that bishops dont need a home square; whilst knights normally need weak squares to act as their base. Also bishops can geometrically stop forward movement of the knight. Another disadvantage of the knight is it operates in one colour. So you can put all of your pieces on the opposite colour and never have to worry about the bishop. All in all, I think both knight and bishops are worth 3 pawns. And a rook is worth 2 minor pieces. And a queen is worth 2 rooks. But in alot of positions a queen still out performs two rooks.
@cancer24454 ай бұрын
these examples don't show bishop power but good pieces cooperation
@haskellglover10504 ай бұрын
No doubt some of my games will become famous and be used in examples but likely none that I won.
@chrisandhongmei4 ай бұрын
So bishops are valuable as sacrifices. I am not sure if this video is sarcasm or not.
@OldmanChess4 ай бұрын
Im here to tell you that a bishop can be better then a knight. But in fact there are a lot of situations where a knight is a lot better then a bishop. A knight for example can play on 2 colour complexes. A bishop is limited to only 32 squares on the board.