Why a Data Lakehouse Architecture

[@AnishBhola]

such a disjointed video. Flow of concepts is not making sense. Analogies come out of the blue and seem difficult to relate to actual concept mentioned by guy on the right.

[@Ralf-CGN]

Didn't hear anythin about performance and possibility of transactional data, commit/rollback, and so on.

[@ariforu4]

I feel bad about IBM. Due to the legacy mindset of the IBM management, they got left behind. Sure IBM will make money because of their legacy products for years to come but it has missed almost all disruptive technology boats. Instead of making two guys talk on Data Lakehouse they could have real product. Feeling sad for IBM.

[@ChanceMinus]

Wow! Luv and Edward are brilliant. Invaluable info. I am feeling like, Neo in the first Matrix, I want more. Thank you.

[@rogeriotalmeida]

Luv and Edward, amazing video. Great analogy. So easy o understand.

[@radhikav4698]

If I have an existing data warehouse let's say, on db2, which is not on object store, will i be able to gain the full benefits of going for a lakehouse if I am not moving/copying the data?

[@KlemenKobilica]

Yes, coming soon. Db2 will be able to read/write from/to lakehouse.

[@surfh3r0]

really interesting, i want to know more!

[@leunam3434]

Two left handed men at the same presentation?

[@IBMTechnology]

The video is flipped in post-production so the writing doesn't appear backwards.

[@Kabodanki]

@@IBMTechnology neat

[@jamesdykstra3438]

So cool

[@IBMTechnology]

See ibm.biz/write-backwards

[@jakestandley7668]

Great video gentlemen!

[@barronwill2614]

great vid !

[@ANTGPRO]

Guys, please keep one person for explanation. Visually one person fits better.

[@diegolainfiesta]

Data swaps you mean?

[@svcTSP]

Don't you think that need to provide a link when you mention some previous video?

[@IBMTechnology]

You can see it here: kzbin.info/www/bejne/e5_YXnh-bLd7fq8

[@dewaynebranch776]

What was the other venue