Testing 3 different methods of cooling a cup of coffee here: kzbin.info/www/bejne/gYDWiqaondOCetU
@carlosquiros5017 Жыл бұрын
P
@KP-zd3hc2 жыл бұрын
Having grown up in Hiroshima, it’s a weird video to watch. Imagine someone telling you that your home was thought uninhabitable, but it’s just a city…
@iamjayprakash2 жыл бұрын
Take. Care and god bless you 💝 i have read so much about it from childhood
@lefantomer2 жыл бұрын
@@iamjayprakash Some years ago I found a "chamber of commerce" brochure in an ephemera lot at an auction showing the recovery of Hiroshima by 1948!
@nikitaw19827 ай бұрын
Hpw does this relate to areas around fukushima. I have to pay attention. What's radiation at ground zero Hiroshima vs around fukushima..
@EpicMathTime5 жыл бұрын
cherynobl = DoT hiroshima = instant damage got it
@Higgsinophysics5 жыл бұрын
lol the whole video explained in 5 words for gamers
@victorfabro1074 жыл бұрын
Epic Math Time Burst damage* get your gamer vocabulary right 🙃
@victorfabro1074 жыл бұрын
@Marc Archibald Lol you dummy I was referring to the "instant damage". Ofc I know what DoT is :) I played wow too Edit: spelling
@victorfabro1074 жыл бұрын
Marc Archibald Not at all, I just pointed out your remark which was pretty stupid 🙂🙂
@cloudygor89483 жыл бұрын
Hiroshima = AOE Cherynbol = Buff DD
@rock3tcatU2335 жыл бұрын
An additional reason as to why Little Boy's fallout was less dangerous than Chernobyl is that only 2% of the U-235 actually fissioned.
@Higgsinophysics5 жыл бұрын
Nice! I did not think of that, but the number checks out. You are right.
@METALSCAVENGER784 жыл бұрын
Asw opposed to 3.5 ± 0.5% of radioactive fuel escaping to the environment in Chernobyl accident
@jonathanwilliams1065 Жыл бұрын
Wouldn’t that mean more got dispersed as fallout?
@krashd Жыл бұрын
@@jonathanwilliams1065 That would be my belief as well, 2% fission would mean 98% dirty bomb, that would be an enormous amount of fallout.
@doyouevengame98695 жыл бұрын
I have been eagerly waiting for another video, and it was well worth the wait!
@Higgsinophysics5 жыл бұрын
Glad to hear that mate - I hope you also got the notification on the video collaboration with Zap Physics
@Warhawk764 жыл бұрын
Thanks. I was always curious about the differences between the two
@soviet_union19363 жыл бұрын
Hiroshima wasn't a disaster it was a attack
@bradearthman83322 жыл бұрын
Like Pearl Harbor was an attack.
@Marc8169 ай бұрын
When the Little Boy exploded at Hiroshima, it did that a bit more than a 1/4 mile up. It did release a huge amount of radioactivity, but in only a small fraction of a second. The fireball did not touch the ground. If it had, a vast amount of radioactive debris would have been created. But at Chernobyl, when the reactor split open, it released a gigantic amount of radioactive material directly onto & into the ground. And it did that over several days. That is why the amount of radiation let go at Hiroshima is nothing compared to what got out at Chernobyl.
@MeargleSchmeargle8 ай бұрын
So essentially, Nuclear Warheads wouldn't make an area completely uninhabitable for centuries due to radiation because the amount of radioactive materials in the bomb are relatively low, and the bomb is designed with the intent of burning through all of that radioactive material instantly to unleash all of the explosive energy at once, so the radiation doesn't last nearly as long (in fact, about 80% of the radioactive products in a nuclear warhead detonation would have already decayed within the 1st hour). What makes nuclear power plant disasters much worse from a long-term radiation exposure perspective is that you need a lot more fuel for it over a significantly longer period of time that isn't burned through instantly for one massive energy release like warheads. There's huge stores of radioactive material that don't get immediately used up, which is what actually allows the unhealthy radiation levels to linger for so long. Aside from the obvious hazard that is flattening an entire city, this actually makes nuclear warheads quite a bit less scary for me than I originally thought they were. My biggest fear when it came to nukes initially was the idea that the radiation would linger for multiple lifetimes and render the place where the detonation happened uninhabitable for hundreds of years unless you wanted to develop every form of cancer imaginable. Now that I know that the vast majority of the radiation from the blast would decay within hours, the city may be destroyed, but there's still the prospect of rebuilding and making the area habitable again within a significantly shorter time frame than I assumed would be the case initially.
@rohithkumarsp5 жыл бұрын
I was just wondering about that, why does your video only have 817 views? Edit wtf was that ending lol
@metroplexgrimlock70893 жыл бұрын
Of course you can't live in chernobyl, it's a nuclear reactor. However, prior to 1986 , and after 1970, you could have lived in Pryp'yat'( or Prypyat).
@wemakecookie3 жыл бұрын
“Wind carries the radioactive fallout away” what happens to that radioactive fallout that’s carried away? Or, how is the radioactive fallout removed?
@Higgsinophysics3 жыл бұрын
It just get's randomly spread out by the wind.. diluted
@BobBarker-ky6fi17 күн бұрын
It travels in the wind and comes in your window buddy
@GeneRauXxX2 жыл бұрын
Perfect, i was just looking for this video. Thanks a ton.
@edilbertorivera34674 жыл бұрын
That huge mushroom cloud... So scary...
@Tensho_C5 жыл бұрын
I hope you'd show us the animations you made longer, it was kind of quick and hard to catch. Nothing is wrong with your face, I just felt like if the entire video was animation, it would suit the theme and atmosphere of your video better. Cutting between these are kind of distracting
@Higgsinophysics5 жыл бұрын
YasashiFPV thanks for the feedback, I’ll keep that in mind for the next video. Maybe work on the flow or gave less “face-time”
@poole46844 жыл бұрын
BRO THANK YOU IVE ALWAYS WONDERED THIS
@PrettyMuchPhysics5 жыл бұрын
Great video and smooooooooth animations!! 💯
@Higgsinophysics5 жыл бұрын
Thank you I Ove you one for the feedback earlier :)
@Dreazzon5 жыл бұрын
Looking sharp!
@BjarturMortensen5 жыл бұрын
He lives! As always, really good and concise knowledge content. But I have to admit I at first thought it was Chernobyl vs. Fukushima...
@Higgsinophysics5 жыл бұрын
You must have been so confessed watching the video haha - thanks man
@aurimasb17325 жыл бұрын
6K ! keep this up, u be big in no time.
@seleneceras30173 жыл бұрын
Great explanation and info, thanks!
@Dontspeakboutme2 жыл бұрын
That beat at the end was bumpin
@annhowcroft9493 Жыл бұрын
Thank you
@nickizcool202 жыл бұрын
Nice video bro! Thanks for the education
@danadurnfordkevinblanchdebunk5 жыл бұрын
You didn't mention Fukushima. No radiation deaths. Lot of deaths at Hiroshima/Nagasaki.
@Higgsinophysics5 жыл бұрын
I thought about adding the radiation death in Hiroshima. You are right
@mikeball13972 жыл бұрын
Great video!!
@toadamine Жыл бұрын
So nuclear war isn't really all that bad as long as you don't get blown up by the actual bomb... everywhere that's ever been bombed built back and is doing just fine... just dont live near a nuclear power plant! Haha
@workaholic45873 жыл бұрын
Bomb that blew up deathstar was pretty big.
@ilyaselekci4 жыл бұрын
As i was watching video this idea just came out of my mind. After hearing differences between theese two incidents,instead of making a covarage to Chernobyl,isn't it possible to put that rest material in a chain reaction like an atomic bomb to let it vaporised in air ? Ps : i'm not a engineer,scientist or etc. just a person who is sitting near you at the park who even does not care about wtf is going on around.
@krashd Жыл бұрын
No, bombs require highly enriched uranium, reactors don't, so it would be impossible to turn the remains of reactor #4 into a bomb without enriching all of the damaged debris - which would be dangerous, costly and time consuming, and probably not even possible with current technology (robots, processes, etc).
@borntoclimb7116 Жыл бұрын
Great work
@mrwetcloth45713 жыл бұрын
Great video
@huntingtonbeachsasquatch17 күн бұрын
Why Is He Talking Into An Aquarium Filter!??🤔
@MoparAdventure5 жыл бұрын
Should've done a chernobyl vs fukushima
@Higgsinophysics5 жыл бұрын
I find these differences fun to explore. Could you explain these difference in radiation levels before watching?
@MoparAdventure5 жыл бұрын
Yes I can, but comparing chernobyl to Hiroshima is like comparing an apple seed to an apple
@EpicMathTime5 жыл бұрын
About fkn time dude shit
@Higgsinophysics5 жыл бұрын
Sorry! I was bench-pressing in the gym!
@Tensho_C5 жыл бұрын
@@Higgsinophysics I can't bench-press for 5 minutes and you can for 5 months? JK Good to see you back was looking for your channel last week but couldn't find your name.
@Higgsinophysics5 жыл бұрын
YasashiFPV thanks man! And eeeh that’s strange. Hopefully KZbin isn’t up to something, you never know
@EpicMathTime5 жыл бұрын
I thought u died
@Nvu264 жыл бұрын
Sad how some people don't even believe in Atomic Bombs.
@paulanderson77969 ай бұрын
What has belief to do with physics and chemistry? Morons like you probably "believe in COVID" as well.
@PinoSilvestreOriginal Жыл бұрын
but THERE IS people and animals living in CHERNOBYL RADIATION ZONE since always... lets say... in fact you can watch a video dedicated to the CHERNOBYL DOGS that were born and lived there all their lives. AND OF COURSE THE WELL KNOWN CASE OF THE LADY (WHO MUST BE ABOUT 90 YEARS OLD NOW) WHO NEVER LEFT THE PLACE. there is many videos on KZbin about that two things a mentioned here...
@joeleonard1314 Жыл бұрын
35 Tons of Uranium?!?!
@wathah323 Жыл бұрын
I think your plant is dying of radiation.
@nD-ci7uw3 жыл бұрын
Nice
@aaroncarter939 Жыл бұрын
Yea I'm not buying it, good video but I highly doubt the official story we've all been fead.
@MrPrince6002 жыл бұрын
0:02 instead of chernobyl you couldve said pripyat
@ginasansone7934 Жыл бұрын
I now have the perfect nuclear family.
@jingai71554 жыл бұрын
My first impression that you look like pewdiepie :/
@jaykaiser17542 жыл бұрын
Sources?
@mikeyfn-a66843 жыл бұрын
Man don't know how it hadn't hit me just how much Japan has endured over time. Hiroshima/Nagasaki, Fukushima, earthquakes..the biggest shame is how beautiful and clean and RESPECTFUL the culture is.
@ChiriKain2 жыл бұрын
dont forget tokyo firebombings
@mikeyfn-a66842 жыл бұрын
@@ChiriKain 😮💨
@Arushi7012 жыл бұрын
Building a country like that after going through that much is an achievement.
@thetaomega78162 жыл бұрын
casually forgetting the reason for the nuking was WWII?? They were bascially asian nazis lol
@mikeyfn-a66842 жыл бұрын
@@thetaomega7816 Seems alot of people were confused and making poor decisions at the time
@megaultrasupernicko5 жыл бұрын
I came to this video
@Higgsinophysics5 жыл бұрын
Our pleasure
@digitalavatar56994 жыл бұрын
HI can you explain Plutonium uranium Carbide. Indian nuclear bomb is made of this and is it powerful than other ?
@themadpelican33914 жыл бұрын
Nope. Its weak but still a nuke
@CVEIWKID Жыл бұрын
Wondering what part of the planet will be habitable after biden and putin are done mashing buttons.
@MonosShenanigans Жыл бұрын
Stalkers Disliked the video
@krismclean50803 жыл бұрын
please fertilize your monstera.
@joepup83484 жыл бұрын
You can live in Hiroshima but not in Chernobyl because they have beer vending machines in Hiroshima, but not in Chernobyl.
@bodychoke3 жыл бұрын
Not funny. Be quiet.
@joepup83483 жыл бұрын
@@bodychoke No, you be quiet because you obviously didn't get it: It means Hiroshima is a bustling, wealthy city that it even has vending machines for beer. Chernobyl is a ghost town, a shell of its former self where the soil and water are contaminated.