Nearly 60 years ago I was a teenage kid interested in ham radio and the license exam had to be taken in person at an FCC office. Living near Chicago, the nearest FCC office was in that building. I still have memories of that building as a massive, elaborate, rock solid building. Some years later, I decided to upgrade my radio license and that required another exam but this time it was in the building that replaced the one built in the late 1800's. I can guarantee that the new federal building has none of the feel of strength and majesty that its predecessor had.
@andreasmorgen75752 жыл бұрын
I so envy you having the experience of being inside this grand and majestic building!
@harveywallbanger37232 жыл бұрын
@@andreasmorgen7575 That building made a real impression on me.for it to be in my mind for about 60 years. I was seated at a massive wooden table to do the paperwork and take the exam. That table was what you imagine to see in in the most beautiful dining halls in the greatest palaces of Europe. Please search KZbin videos about the Rialto Square Theater in Joliet, IL. This is another one of my favorite buildings near where I live. It is a 96 year old movie palace type theater that has been restored and is still being used today.
@LUIS-ox1bv2 жыл бұрын
Two key words; strength and majesty. Traits lacking in modern civic and institutional architecture.
@jeromewysocki8809 Жыл бұрын
In 1963, I took my exam there, too. The address was, I believe, 219 S. Clark St. @ 826 US Courthouse. You are right. The building was massive. I loved looking down from the dome.
@LUIS-ox1bv Жыл бұрын
@@jeromewysocki8809 You gentleman were lucky to have had experienced something we and the rest of those who truly love Chicago were robbed of. Mies' frigid, monolithic slabs, which can easily pass for an office/residential/hospital building, can never properly fill the role of a federal courthouse.
@fennec132 жыл бұрын
Yikes - I though we lost a lot of stuff here in NYC with stuff like the Old Penn station - and Singer buildings - but my goodness what a loss - for those terrible looking slabs of buildings - what a shame our architectural heritage can be destroyed for the sake of government red tape.
@pieluvr73622 жыл бұрын
More like cover ups
@carstarsarstenstesenn2 жыл бұрын
It is truly a disgrace. The channel "Kings and Things" also has a great video on this topic titled, "America's Lost Neoclassical Architecture." The video talks about Penn Station and the Federal Building
@ksavage6812 жыл бұрын
True, but if it was your taxes raised to keep up with the horrible maintenance costs, most people vote to demolish and build new.
@johnmorrissey24432 жыл бұрын
Those terrible looking buildings and the entire federal plaza were designed by Mies van Der Rohe. There is a lot of very interesting aspects to them if you know where to look
@LUIS-ox1bv2 жыл бұрын
@Caleb OKAY Very good of you to recognize the link between the decline in architecture and the degeneration of society.
@emu50882 жыл бұрын
I had no idea so many of the buildings I love in Chicago were designed by the same guy who did the beautiful demolished federal building (that building at University of Chicago, Athletic Association, Newberry Library (Where my wedding reception will be!), and the others you showed! I used to think Art Deco was my favorite style of architecture but I know now it's definitely beaux arts! Cheers to Beaux Arts!! Once again, you astound me with the quality and the subjects of your videos! Amazing, amazing, amazing!
@DaveSCameron2 жыл бұрын
I found that same phenomenon over here in England, Liverpool for example Anglican cathedral by Giles-Scott who was responsible for many other buildings both in Liverpool and London, incidentally he also designed some of our finest old Football stadia, I believe only Everton is remaining but also Spurs and Glasgow Rangers previous stadiums. Fascinating to finally look upwards as I get older and take the time to wonder at my world 🤔😘 Best wishes 🙏
@dogwklr Жыл бұрын
You really all think that these people were responsible for so many of these majestic buildings on their own in each country? Each of them is a singular work of art, taking years to complete given all the interior and exterior ornate work. The stories behind these buildings are mostly bs, like the ones in Paris that were in their 20s and designed dozens of palaces 😂 The man who designed versailles was apparently not even an architect but a buddy of the king and he casually just threw it together 😂😂 the stories go the same way if you look into each place like San francisco and new york etc
@freetolook37272 жыл бұрын
These old buildings were designed to last at least 100 years showcasing the stability of government and civilization.. The average brick and mortor retail building of strip mall fame is designed to only last 20 years showcasing that retail trends change and it is cheaper and easier to demolish and build new.
@653j5212 жыл бұрын
Well, it started to decline a lot faster than 100 years so it failed in its vision.
@andreasmorgen75752 жыл бұрын
And they're ugly!
@jamesslick47902 жыл бұрын
@@653j521 Or, More likely the government neglected it.
@kingblanco77912 жыл бұрын
That’s bs that’s what they want you to think. 😂 go take a look at the science and industry museum that building will last forever. They been burying and destroying tartarian architecture all over the world stay woke.
@dogwklr Жыл бұрын
You people need to travel around more if you can. These buildings are literal mountains of stone and can last 1000 years no problem. They did not decline easily, they are very similar to St Peters basilica in robustness and that's 600 years old roughly. The philly city hall is just like this, clearly they are far older than we are being told. Why is a post office being made into a Palace? What is the purpose of such a difficult project and the decoration can't even be attempted nowadays. These buildings do not collapse, they endure forever more or less
@theicepickthatkilledtrotsk6582 жыл бұрын
In the US especially, so many Arhitectual masterpieces have been destroyed to make way for bleak modernist buildings each blander than the last.
@themoviedealers2 жыл бұрын
Also in Germany because half of their buildings got destroyed in World War 2.
@DaveSCameron2 жыл бұрын
Yes it's so sad, here in England we Grade our older buildings from 1/3 and fortunately this does stop any destruction, hell even dilapidated farm buildings have been saved because they house nesting barn owls 🦉 in their smashed up rafters 😊🙏
@uwharriebigfoothunter Жыл бұрын
They've done that all over. Erase history and make more money
@sandybruce90927 ай бұрын
IMO it started back in the 50s and 60s with this destruction of beautiful and very usable buildings being demolished and a miserable “modern” building built in its place!
@fasttrackeducation71235 ай бұрын
It was deliberately done by communists / bankers. It's been known since Rome that beautiful architecture inspires the population. Brutish "modern" architecture is not inspiring. Intentional. Research and you can find WHO is behind it.
@PerpetualSolivagant2 жыл бұрын
I first saw this building when I started to make my video “Chicago Then and Now” last year. I didn’t include it because it no longer existed. I knew it should be a great building but didn’t know it was so great until I watched your informative video. I really learned a lot: the architect, the construction and other aspects of this splendid building and the history of Chicago.
@n.l.vannstallings46642 жыл бұрын
It should be illegal to tear down such beautiful architecture and less Beyond any reasonable repair or dangerous to people. You're never going to get that level of craftsmanship again with such beautiful materials
@ITSHISTORY2 жыл бұрын
Comment below👇 Anyone from Illinois seeing this video? I'd be curious to know what town!
@salty6pence6722 жыл бұрын
Chicago
@ITSHISTORY2 жыл бұрын
@@salty6pence672 I use to live on LSD
@salty6pence6722 жыл бұрын
@@ITSHISTORY I live on the south side now. I used to live in Hyde Park. My Mom worked at Rockefeller Chapel & used to give tours of the Robie house. It sparked my love of architecture.
@Aggergate_Demand2 жыл бұрын
Yep, use the blueline Federal Plaza Stop on Jackson Station. The old building belongs in Springfield or Rockford. Doesn't match with the Chicago skyline and Mlie's design is far better when looking outside from the inside (government workers). The Plaza is more designed for people to gather and protest safety. Beside too many federal courts are neoclassical. Glad that it's more government as a business design and Post Office is a logistics front lobby to a very complex distribution system underground.
@rosezingleman50072 жыл бұрын
I used to live on North Halsted south of Diversey, a few doors north of Kingston Mines. Sweet Home Chicago.
@TheBaritoneCrooner2 жыл бұрын
FYI: The picture shown at 13:23 and again at 13:48 is upside down! What looked like a patterned ceiling, was actually the marble floor!
@majorneptunejr2 жыл бұрын
Good eye. I didn't notice that. It just goes to show you how beautiful even the floor was.
@jamesslick47902 жыл бұрын
I know right. I thought I was "tripping" to see that stairway...on the ceiling.
@squidward_tortelllini2 ай бұрын
@@TheBaritoneCrooner this comment is confusing tf out of me help what do u mean it’s upside down? there’s people standing upright in it??!?
@MatryoshkabombАй бұрын
What are you even talking about?
@squidward_tortellliniАй бұрын
@@Matryoshkabombim still confused lol i think they mean the building is upside down even though it doesn’t look like that and there’s signage on the front that’s clearly upright..??
@oliverrojas31852 жыл бұрын
Thanks for showcasing this building. I don't know what else to say other than, new is not always better. The trees, labor hours at the quarry, the horses or trains delivering the goods, the man hours of physical labor may not have been given consideration before deciding on the value of the building. When I think of similar losses, one loss still present to this day albeit in a different field is that of the original 7 to 9 oz Coke Bottle.
@ITSHISTORY2 жыл бұрын
Exactly, and this is reason we will never have a building like that again in Chicago.
@653j5212 жыл бұрын
@@ITSHISTORY We will never have anything again. Technology, needs, priorities, ecological awareness, everything changes. You can bemoan that immutable fact or you can appreciate the best of all eras.
@DEEuroworks2 жыл бұрын
Very interesting, thank you for posting.
@freetolook37272 жыл бұрын
We as Americans do not embrace our history. Instead it's like we're more ashamed of it and the philosophy of newer is better prevails. Isn't always they say "it'll cost too much money to renovate and it's old" but when they o to tear it down, not only does it take an extraordinary effort to demolish but the cost overruns make it more expensive to build the new building... the cheaper cost of renovation long forgotten.
@jessemurray17572 жыл бұрын
MANY Americans love history. Unfortunately, those with money and power do not.
@653j5212 жыл бұрын
@@jessemurray1757 Some do and some don't. Have you done enough research to make that blanket statement?
@653j5212 жыл бұрын
Renovation of an overly small and outmoded building in a key spot is hugely expensive in every way. I'm sure if you were a worker there you wouldn't romanticize it.
@andreasmorgen75752 жыл бұрын
@K Kr he did say many not all...
@Aeyekay02 жыл бұрын
those ugly glass and metal cubes replaced that beautiful building, what sad decision it what to destroy that building
@louisaugustexvi45152 жыл бұрын
It is a Mies Van Der Rohe Masterpiece. You may see 50 drab buildings that look familiar to these 3 but the thing is they created this trend. they’re like a black chanel dress, timeless, perfect. they have beautiful lobbies all leading out to the calder statues. the Interiors are well thought out with high quality materials making them luxurious and practical, and quite frankly they changed american architecture forever
@alaskanpitbull2 жыл бұрын
Loved the video, but I would put in a slight criticism. The buildings that currently stand on the site today are obviously no replacement for the beauty and opulence of the old Federal Building, but I take exception to them being called a bleak corporate abomination. The new federal plaza was designed by Mies van der Rohe and is intended to be a “less is more” modernest approach to architecture. Mies is also one of our most famous and revered Chicago architects alongside Sullivan, Burnham, Root, and Wright. I know that Mies’ architectural style is not to everyone’s taste, but that doesn’t make it an abomination. It’s still a shame and a tragedy that the city decided to demolish the old building, but in terms of its replacement, you could do a lot worse.
@stephenmoerlein84702 жыл бұрын
I agree. Mies is iconic from a different era.
@zagatoalfa2 жыл бұрын
Bingo. The current post office and it’s plaza are fantastic.
@anthonyberardi36112 жыл бұрын
Here, here!
@brushcreek422 жыл бұрын
van der Rohe's is nothing more than a sleep inducing glass and steel building that stands out in no way from thousands of other ugly modernist buildings constructed since the 1950s. What would make this stand out from the thousands of others? I wouldn't walk a block to see this thing.
@LUIS-ox1bv2 жыл бұрын
@Kyle Fullenkamp Funny. Miesien architecture IS reductive.
@samueljohnstone47202 жыл бұрын
Hi I don't live in the US do you not have listed buildings? this Federal building was quite impressive I don't see how permission was given to demolish a historic structure
@carstarsarstenstesenn2 жыл бұрын
This building was demolished in 1965 back when these types of listings were very rare. Nowadays, we have a lot more in the way of historical preservation but this was the 1960s.
@asb3pe2 жыл бұрын
It's because it doesn't fit into conventional history... so it HAD to be destroyed. There are a LOT of such architectural mis-fits around the world, but most people don't see them as such because it isn't taught in university or in the academic textbooks. Some call it "Tartarian" architecture but that's a red-herring misnomer term, the term I think is best for them is "worldwide consistent architecture", and these buildings tell a fascinating story that you won't hear in the mainstream (or even on this channel). Another term to look up and study is "starforts" which again is a generic term that is probably not the correct word for them, but it is the best search term to discover yet another fascinating angle to our past human history that has largely been covered up and never really discussed in depth. Almost ALL the major european cities were once "starfort" constuction on a massive scale, the ancient maps show their former glory, most of it now de-constructed and hence erased from conventional history...
@teen_laqueefa2 жыл бұрын
@@asb3pe Yes here in America our forts were starforts near waterways
@ecmunz2 жыл бұрын
The US only passed a historic preservation bill in 1966. And even then it has taken an enormous amount of public input/protest to keep historic buildings from being demolished.
@653j5212 жыл бұрын
Have you considered the cost of repairing and updating a structure that is no longer large enough for a necessary job in that central spot? Clearly the bomber wasn't as enamored of it as people are in retrospect. What could have been done for the poor with the money for that dome and embellishments?
@schr752 жыл бұрын
Great channel
@ITSHISTORY2 жыл бұрын
Great comment:)
@charlie-lx6sl2 жыл бұрын
You did a real nice job on this Great oration
@AshLilburne2 жыл бұрын
Ryan all these videos are brilliant. Keep it up mate 👍
@Shahrdad10 ай бұрын
I thought there was always something odd and not quite right about the outside of this building, but the interior of the dome was just magnificent. I'd still prefer that to the grim Mies cubes that occupy the site now.
@originaluddite2 жыл бұрын
Great to see Abbott and Costello playing their part in city planning at 7:45 in. :)
@gbode77622 жыл бұрын
The current building isn’t an abomination. The service at that post office however…
@geofftucker96222 жыл бұрын
…is the worst ever?
@nikkola335 ай бұрын
Well its not as beautiful as the previous building.
@strangeluck2 жыл бұрын
I wish you'd explained more about the structural problems it encountered. You might not like what went in it's place but it sounded like it was fatally flawed and required razing.
@deucegoose86752 жыл бұрын
The old building was truly beautiful but I believe there is a subtle beauty to Mies's design as well. They are steel and glass boxes but there are many small design choices that enable me to appreciate it more than most modern highrise projects
@mrs.g.98162 жыл бұрын
I think Beaux Arts is one of the most beautiful architectural styles. So much better than all the cold, drab, strictly functional architecture of today. I like that Vincent Scully quote, "One entered the city like a god, one scuttles in now like a rat."
@dogwklr Жыл бұрын
When you realise how many countries have these basically identical buildings and how many were demolished, it really makes you wonder wtf ws going on back then. We have so many left but have lost even more. If they all still stood, the world would look oddly uniform
@kramnalla642 жыл бұрын
the upside down photo at 13:23 really confusing
@chiron14pl2 жыл бұрын
I agree with your assessment of the aesthetics of the new Federal buildings. You could have added the note that they were designed by Mies van der Rohe, another noted Chicago architect.
@markiangooley2 жыл бұрын
What’s the difference between masonary and masonry?
@stephenmoerlein84702 жыл бұрын
Interesting history. Thanks for posting
@beanzbros8862 жыл бұрын
I love your videos
@johnnyzeee52152 жыл бұрын
Of course. So many great architectural treasures in this country, have been lost forever.
@mkervelegan2 жыл бұрын
Not quite so: the Custom House was built in 1932 as a Federal building, housing many Federal departments and agencies in Chicago and supplanting the nearby Federal Building.
@keithbattaglia2 жыл бұрын
Amazing how this old Tartarian architecture was erased from when Chicago was Chilaga. We didn’t build these
@0fficialdregs Жыл бұрын
that quote near the end was also used when the famous Pennsylvania Station was destroyed.
@drewbaker1002 жыл бұрын
Please be respectful of Meis Van Der Rohe. He is a major part of Chicago history as well. The courthouse may have been gone too soon for some, however it would have been a complete rundown relic by now.
@HobbyOrganist2 жыл бұрын
There are buildings in Europe 900 years old still in daily use, age is not a problem NEGLECT and changing "styles" are the problem
@LUIS-ox1bv2 жыл бұрын
Mies' Federal Plaza has also had refurbishments as well. No matter. His buildings, whether in Chicago, New York or Toronto, all resemble each other save some sleight details. While I can certainly appreciate and understand what he was trying to acheive, his buildings do not relate to the city on a pedestrian, street level. Nor do they create memorable skylines. Cities which have a minimal representation of Miesien works, should be relieved that their urban fabric was spared.
@daniellinehan63 Жыл бұрын
Mies= ugly Boxes
@AbstractEntityJ7 ай бұрын
No, I don't respect him.
@claudermiller2 жыл бұрын
Americans. Let's tear down all these decrepit buildings and build a modern skyscraper. No! Let's tear down this absolutely gorgeous one instead.
@mrpeel32392 жыл бұрын
Luv that Scully quote!
@albinosquirlz2 жыл бұрын
Anyone who refers to the Mies design as "a bleak corporate abomination" has no credibility as an architecture critc. Chicago traded up.
@whattheshep68142 жыл бұрын
Now that winter's here, you can take your cold takes home.
@Itravelbackintime2 жыл бұрын
The building could have been a museum. The Chicago Heritage Museum.
@anrn53032 жыл бұрын
@10:23 this is when you start to pronounce “masonary” instead of “masonry”; still a great video!
@FernandoTRA2 жыл бұрын
So I wasn't the only one that noticed it.
@anrn53032 жыл бұрын
@@FernandoTRA right right? :)
@FernandoTRA2 жыл бұрын
@@anrn5303 yes
@bengilbreath2 жыл бұрын
I can't not hear it.
@anrn53032 жыл бұрын
@@bengilbreath listen closely, attentively :)
@lisaciota11772 жыл бұрын
The current Federal Center is a rhapsody of precision, light and air. Like the classic little black Chanel dress, the space today is open and airy in the middle the city. It allows space for people to engage with the famous Alexander Calder sculpture or enjoy a farmers market or to gather and protest. As nice as the old building may have been, it doesn’t match the elegance of the masterpiece by Ludwig Mies Van der Rohe.
@OrphanDirector2 жыл бұрын
Thank you, came here looking for this. If you are going to bash Van der Rohe you better at least mention his name in the video. With so many imitators I understand why some people like this guy don’t get it. But I’ll never forget, as a native Chicagoan, whose old man worked in the federal building for 30 years, the unbelievable majesty and precision and power I felt in the plaza as I saw all the lines in the skyscraper matching the lines in the massive concrete I was standing on. Van der Rohe changed the game forever and pushed us into the next era. Cobb made a nice swan song to the last era at best, one among many.
@louisaugustexvi45152 жыл бұрын
THANK YOU SO MUCH
@vassa19722 жыл бұрын
Good stuff I wish you guys do something on my city of Hamilton Ontario Canada, they had a old history of street cars too I think?
@deanmitchell9042 жыл бұрын
That's a Mies Van Der Rohe masterpiece, not a bleak building. Old one is cool too. But the new one is actually history.
@dogwklr Жыл бұрын
Sure thing. Concrete and glass trash is way more impressive than a building that could literally never be replicated for the rest of time. No wonder they were torn down when tasteless eyes look at them as "cool" 🙄 The narrative of structural problems is fcking hilarious. A building so heavy and vast would not stand for decades then suddenly have major issues, they would be apparent immediately due to the colossal weight having to be handled by the foundations.
@daniellinehan63 Жыл бұрын
Mies= ugly box
@chathamcrescent2 жыл бұрын
Cool video and subject matter! Btw, it’s masonry, not “masonery”
@mr.k61362 жыл бұрын
Being from Chicago I appreciate all the buildings and architecture you cover in this wonderful but ugly City that I live in
@gervorusreturns43002 жыл бұрын
Sorry your ghetto
@abusednomoresilence2 жыл бұрын
I love Chicago but I detest violence and crime. Including the Court System that keeps letting criminals out on electronic monitoring.
@mattdeans98732 жыл бұрын
Thanks for a wonderful informative video. Love love love old classical architecture. If you are narrating this video... I dont want to appear uppity.... you pronounce beaux arts as 'boh-zart.' its just a french thing. and soften the 'T' at the end. ;)
@tahiragibson64072 жыл бұрын
Actually the old building looked rather dark and oppressive, like a jail, or something Kafka would get lost in.
@LUIS-ox1bv2 жыл бұрын
Yes, and modern schools, churches, banks, all look like office buildings. Yawn!
@ArtistsCry132 жыл бұрын
The Kluczynski Federal Building is not a bleak and corporate abomination! This is one of the finest, classiest examples of modernist architecture. Just because it’s sleek with black steel and glass doesn’t mean it isn’t beautiful. The Chicago Federal Building was rapidly falling apart and was severely out of date. You have to remember the attitude at the time and the fact that it was built at the height of modernist architecture - neoclassical buildings were considered ugly and obsolete. The movement to preserve old buildings was only JUST beginning then as the general attitude was that only Europeans did that. After all, this is America - we are a modern, progressive, forward-thinking society and our civilization is based on the cutting edge and the new and improved (at the time this was actually true, whereas now Europe is like this). Just because a building lacks any ornamentation DOES NOT mean that it can’t be beautiful - Modernist architecture was about proving that there was beauty in minimalism and ornament is unneeded (and this is coming from someone who loves Classical architecture).
@jubu31362 жыл бұрын
the original post office was amazing haha that guy needs his eyes checked.
@utahdan2312 жыл бұрын
When I read a book Lost Chicago , my heart breaks.
@LUIS-ox1bv2 жыл бұрын
Read this classic upon first moving to Chicago. I was astonished at just how many masterpieces were given the heave ho for even the flimsiest excuses. The grief only becomes more acute when one really delves into the subject and comes across examples of the first Chicago School, which were wantonly done away with. The Loop itself, would be more lively and far more interesting had they kept so many of these beautiful structures. The Loop has lost so much of its vitality.
@mariocisneros9113 ай бұрын
Old man Mayor Richard Daley(the father),(1902-1976) was farsighted, but ignorant to preserving many elaborate architectural masterpieces. These buildings were built 1885-1915 ,the mayor living with them , didnt appreciate the masterpieces we had. All were from an era like the Titanic: Glass stained windows, marble walls, pillars, floors, brass fixtures, beautiful iron elavators.. A dozen were torn down when he was mayor1955-76, maybe more. And many more 1939-54
@zagatoalfa2 жыл бұрын
Calling buildings designed by one of the worlds most celebrated architects is an interesting move.
@keithstevens56142 жыл бұрын
They should had moved the post office floor underground not to break its vertical symmetry.
@mikegruber1722 жыл бұрын
They can thank Brunelesschi from Florence
@bucurserjobsj2 жыл бұрын
Poor old federal bilding.. such a beautiful arhitecture.. 😥 Btw: it's the same place they filmed "office christmas party" 🤣🤣
@eprohoda2 жыл бұрын
good night-unuual shots.
@robertwbingo2 жыл бұрын
Love your videos, but......"Masonary"? Uh-uh. "Masonry".
@rosezingleman50072 жыл бұрын
Surprising isn’t it?
@ITSHISTORY2 жыл бұрын
Dyslexia
@According11119 ай бұрын
This was built well before our time.
@BGTuyau7 ай бұрын
And so one must conclude that MIT is not prestigious? [approximately 3:18-3:23] That said, nice historical research, minutely detailed at times -along with supporting graphics.
@patrickf.44402 жыл бұрын
Let me correct Mies Van Der Rohe: Less is Less. Pat, in Chicago
@LUIS-ox1bv2 жыл бұрын
Precisely!!!
@hotdawg98402 жыл бұрын
He said prestigious.....it's... Prestige Worldwide wide wide wide wide
@JM-ec9kp2 жыл бұрын
This channel is incredibly based
@hopatease12 жыл бұрын
Why was it torn down and replaced . Heck I can say it in two words KICK BACK . The graft that was involved and money that went back in forth made many rich .Its the way it always works .
@daniellinehan63 Жыл бұрын
After 1955........!!.......no great building was safe.
@nakayle2 жыл бұрын
Seems like there could have been other land found for the new buildings rather than destroying this one.
@kurtmanasco672 жыл бұрын
That's a shame that would have added to the city something other than what they have now
@johnerwin90242 жыл бұрын
the destruction Europe experienced in WWII in many ways matched here in the U.S. with urban renewal following the war 😶
@tsnovak205 ай бұрын
America used to be so beautiful... now it's just a glass box with a parking lot and a highway
@MeTubeERG5 ай бұрын
God, what a galactic, nightmarish waste. Plenty of gorgeous Chicago landmarks are as old if not older than this buidling and are still standing in splendor.
@thomasdriessen9372 жыл бұрын
was gonna watch this, then the "Extra sponsorship " came up. closed the window
@majorneptunejr2 жыл бұрын
Your loss .
@johnmercier58682 жыл бұрын
What's the difference between Masonry and masonary. Masonary isn't a word. Masonry (ma-son-ry) is the proper word for stone work and for the famous fraternity. Please learn to pronounce it correctly
@stenbak88 Жыл бұрын
The government is so over inflated with workers who do nothing
@Jasona19762 жыл бұрын
What a cultural disaster the loss of this building was.
@mikevale36202 жыл бұрын
Similarly in Australia where I am, the 1960's was a shocking time for the destruction of Victorian era buildings as we were then living in the 'modern age' of space travel etc and the new public buildings had to reflect that, but they are generally souless boxes without any redeeming qualities and consequently arriving like a god, but these days scurrying in like a rat is very appropriate.
@johndonlon16112 жыл бұрын
This building was a stinking rat-infested mess when it finally was demolished. To this day I can remember as it sat, half demolished with its many itty-bitty green painted rooms, all covered in years of cigarette and cigar smoke, and it just stunk like old tobacco smoke and urine......good riddance.
@brianc75yt2 жыл бұрын
A good story about excellence and American ingenuity. Suggestion: the proper word is “masonry” (ma-son-ry) - not “masonary,” which is not in the dictionary.
@anthonyellis9872 жыл бұрын
Another beautiful building gone. Today cities are turning into canyons of soulless, uninspiring glass and steel constructions.
@drewh91662 жыл бұрын
MASONRY not MASONARY! I hear ppl say that all the time though
@majorneptunejr2 жыл бұрын
I would have never noticed if it was not for the comments
@carlthornton30762 жыл бұрын
Very Good!... #215 ✝ {7-20-2022}
@sos102 жыл бұрын
Thabk god they tore down that banal and uninspired building and replaced it with the exciting Mies designed building that is world renowned for its beauty.
@LUIS-ox1bv2 жыл бұрын
When tour guides lead groups to explore Chicago's Loop, the Federal Plaza, is not given much time, and for good reason. The spare linear series of boxes, while dignified, simply give the appearance of being an office complex situated on a barren plaza. One would hardly be blamed for not thinking that they contain courtooms and other governmental functions. The point is that Chicago's record at preserving one of the aspects its world known for, has been a mixed bag to a poor one at best. If the city had taken its architectural legacy and standing on a more serious level early on, they would have taken pains to save the noble and imposing old Federal Building and placed the Federal Plaza at an alternative location. Then again, the reality of Chicago circa the 1960s was that most people during that time harbored minimal interest in buildings of historic value. Mayor Daley had little love for historic preservation. In fact he was all for doing away with anything that recalled Chicago's sordid past. Al Capone, Chicago's most notorious gangster, was put on trial in the Federal Building. Knowing that the "Boss," disliked any references to Capone, would have been reason enough in his eyes to get rid of the Federal Building. Nevertheless, had the building survived, it would have been put into other uses, and with a good scrub down, plus strategic lighting on its facade and commanding dome, it would have been an imposing and luminous sight at night, as opposed to the dark, urban tundra that spurns visitors now.
@monnezzapromizoulin51692 жыл бұрын
You really have to be American to have so little respect for historic buildings
@richardnelson642 жыл бұрын
Good story!! 🖖🌞❗👌👉👍🔆😀💠✝️♥️✌️☮️🎆
@user-rh8yw6qj5j2 жыл бұрын
Please say masonry not masonary,
@MrInfinitefinality2 жыл бұрын
Finders keepers !
@smokeheavystudios2 жыл бұрын
Do St. Louis’ Mill Creek neighborhood! Definitely an interesting story that should be told. Great video as always man.
@joywest84112 жыл бұрын
Tartaria .. research.
@salty6pence6722 жыл бұрын
✌️❤️
@ITSHISTORY2 жыл бұрын
Peace!
@jake17767 ай бұрын
America's greatest days are behind her, sadly. All the beauty torn down and replaced by giant garbage bins.
@rob58942 жыл бұрын
Tear down beauty to build a glass box. Just disgusting.
@FordFracture2 жыл бұрын
I've been to both of them so I've been told but I don't remember the first federal building because I was only one year old . but I will say the current federal building is UGLY and a waste of space ! but that's how Chicago Operates ! waste as much money as you can and take twice as long
@scottblance14737 ай бұрын
Had to downvote for the slander on Big Bill Haywood and the IWW! Leave the red scare hysteria in the past
@misterx71712 жыл бұрын
WHY ARE SO MANY OTHER SIMILAR BUILDINGS IN THE US AND AROUND THE WORLD STILL STANDING?? THIS STORY DOESN'T SEEM TO MAKE SENSE..
@jubu31362 жыл бұрын
what crane lifted that dome? it would be 100 tonne plus
@Fevebblefester2 жыл бұрын
Built in place?
@andreasmorgen75752 жыл бұрын
As you can see in the video the dome was not lifted and dropped down. It was built in stages.
@anthonyberardi36112 жыл бұрын
I don't agree with your "opinion" of the present day Federal Center. And I'm certain Mies would take issue with you as well. Your pedestrian and philistien approach as to what constitutes good architecture is purely that of your own.
@danjackson2014 Жыл бұрын
We did NOT build these buildings.... Have you heard of TARTARIA.....
@mariocisneros9112 жыл бұрын
The 1940's - the 1960's saw so many masterpieces destroyed and many by papa Daley after 1955 . OH THIS IS THE REAL BUILDING WHERE AL CAPONE WAS FOUND GUILTY OF TAX EVASION .
@paulwilliams87252 жыл бұрын
👍 🇬🇧
@robertdipaola34472 жыл бұрын
Its a Dame shame, made about as much sense as the destruction of penn station in nyc for that hatbox called Madison Square garden!!!
@TruthSpeaker34 ай бұрын
Right, because we need a building with imported marble from Italy, for a post office. Ok. Stay gullible folks
@richardkennedy84812 жыл бұрын
The pictures you're showing don't match what you are saying.