The dark-horse alliance racing forward to take on China: on.wsj.com/3UvYbw0
@freeworld888888 ай бұрын
And china defeated all western lies. germany and France are joining china now . , america has ruined Japan, EU and ussr economy but no change against china.
@Tim2023-x7v8 ай бұрын
😅
@KhaledRajiuddin8 ай бұрын
Please sir make a documentary about akhund varat
@renkylo21798 ай бұрын
The Jew Street Journal will never report on how Israhell is expanding AND OCCUPYING Into PALESTINE So Aggressively
@findinglang20038 ай бұрын
can you tell the audiences what is your purpose and why you care China more than your own country USA? or you are just the so called western media who always make fake news? mind your own country's business first! your country is in a big mess now
@ConniSabrih8 ай бұрын
Now i understand why WSJ just decided to move its asia headquarter from Hong Kong to Singapore 🌝
@darthvadeth62908 ай бұрын
Haha yep. The new anti-spy law would have fked WSJ up 🤣🤣
@chadgarcia9838 ай бұрын
Based. They would have ended up in prison for telling the truth.
@thyristo8 ай бұрын
@@darthvadeth6290Let's ask ourselves what the relationship between the WSJ and the CIA as well as the NSA is.
@LivingLonger8 ай бұрын
Ever since it was founded in 1983, the NED has been a tool for the US to safeguard its hegemony around the world. Whenever the US has a problem with some country or region, the NED is always there to find problems with its "democracy".
@darthvadeth62908 ай бұрын
@@thyristo probably the same type of relationship as American tech companies and NSA as revealed by Edward Snowden 😂
@jghall008 ай бұрын
Will China claim the moon when it lands there?
@michaellanoue91568 ай бұрын
Yes. They play Go while others play chess. Occupying territory confers power. This is what they do.
@liongjiahwong54788 ай бұрын
Western narrative.
@sahilsingh60488 ай бұрын
Well china actually claimed
@鲁迅-w9t8 ай бұрын
yes
@lyttlebee8 ай бұрын
That i'm not sure, but the westerners landed in the Americas hundreds years ago, and claimed the indian's lands theirs. That's a fact!
@oldsteamguy8 ай бұрын
when the neighbouring country randomly starts building villages on your land.......
@carkawalakhatulistiwa8 ай бұрын
The reason why China can claim it is because no one lives on that part of the mountain
@gingerbread_GB8 ай бұрын
Except China claim those land too.
@D33PEST-F33L8 ай бұрын
It should be noted that this ridiculous boundary, which is incomprehensible, was left by the British in order to use regional disputes to achieve their continental balance-of-power strategy in relation to British geopolitical tactics.
@user-jt3dw6vv4x8 ай бұрын
@@gingerbread_GB They don't own it though. They claim it but it's under the jurisdiction of the Bhutanese government. So yes what the OP said is correct because it is legally Bhutanese land.
@theonlycaulfield8 ай бұрын
@@gingerbread_GBDoean't matter. It is internationally recognized as Bhutan's land.
@aKenheart8 ай бұрын
Oh yeah, same story with the Philippines, first they built their so called "fisherman shelter" and then they reclaim the shoal then started to own the place.
@Mk19-xc9bm8 ай бұрын
You mean what china is actually doing right now
@zkh1738 ай бұрын
@@Mk19-xc9bm didn't Philippines occupy the island first after a typhoon??
@cheesepowder22048 ай бұрын
@@zkh173 didnt china build military bases inside the philippine's EEZ?
@theodore23sanchez8 ай бұрын
@@徐行-z5x Those US military bases have the permission of the Philippine government and it's people. Meanwhile, China occupied those islands without the permission of the Philippines. Those two events are not equivalent whatsoever.
@designengrwafu53108 ай бұрын
@@zkh173it was ours, China doesnt belong in the South East Asian Region
@agriffino8 ай бұрын
"Gatekeep. Gaslight. Girlboss." - old Chinese proverb
@vishalgautamm8 ай бұрын
You mean old American proverb
@jaclrossrick63278 ай бұрын
Tell me how hawaii and california was stolen by usa again?
@agriffino8 ай бұрын
@@vishalgautamm it's "Live, laugh, love. Thank u, next."
@moriumakhter24248 ай бұрын
@@agriffino keep typing where World have seen of America's hegemony and aggression
@DCresident1238 ай бұрын
oh the irony
@qpwo88 ай бұрын
someone please save bhutan they are a beautiful country and dont deserve this
@zen4men8 ай бұрын
I agree
@frozenhanren49288 ай бұрын
Bhutan is an ALLY of China
@PapiDey-dv4gw8 ай бұрын
India says attacking Bhutan will be considered attacking India. We will not let them enter Doklam.
@donkeykong5168 ай бұрын
Bhutan saves itself by working with China
@Slydime9178 ай бұрын
If they can't see what China is trying to do and taking no action, then it's natural selection at this point. It's the same strategy Russia uses - salami tactics
@Patrick-sl8pc8 ай бұрын
I like how all the bots deflect China's actions by saying another country is doing the same thing. China can never do bad huh.
@ARIA-In8 ай бұрын
chineese bots are activated very fast
@freeworld888888 ай бұрын
troll dud here
@yogadarmawan30518 ай бұрын
More like americans always roasting their own country
@najeebchoudhary8 ай бұрын
but not faster than Indian ones.
@wingzwonder8 ай бұрын
china no. 1
@TomNook.8 ай бұрын
What's interesting is that the "Chinese bots lol" comments both have EXACTLY the same number of likes 🤔
@ap-dk5yw8 ай бұрын
Chinese paid keyboard warriors trying to damage control 😂
@tresphore31858 ай бұрын
You are dealing with another sovereign nation, Bhutan is of course close to India and their are geopolitical challenges to their ambitions. But the decision to build anything on Bhutan soil remains entirely on the government. We can talk about it, have various assumptions regarding these settlements. But it's the government of Bhutan that have the last word.
@TomNook.8 ай бұрын
When any opinion outside the established narrative is a bot, do you really have freedom of thought 🤔
@ylstorage70858 ай бұрын
good thing that the Chinese don't have access to youtube, otherwise comment sections will be drowned...
@kaimanyu5868 ай бұрын
@@ylstorage7085 what makes you think Chinese have no access to youtube?
@LeonWagg8 ай бұрын
Tbh, I see more Indian keyboard warriors throughout the internet than I see Chinese lol.
@bryannantrax1108 ай бұрын
the indians better move up there quick before china becomes a bigger issue for them lol
@Kevin-fq3zh8 ай бұрын
they are too busy building temples and going after peacefuls in their own country to realise what’s happening
@recon178 ай бұрын
have you banned tik tok yet?
@Superpooper-20208 ай бұрын
We indians have learned our lesson in 1962. We dont want to lose another aksai chin. We surrender ✋🏿🤚🏿
@sleepingduty29878 ай бұрын
@@Superpooper-2020 nice try winne the pooh bot
@cosmos68738 ай бұрын
@@Superpooper-2020 Chinese learned their lesson in 1967 nathu la and from their friend Pakistan in 1971 in Bangladesh to surrender very quickly .
@MS-ty8eq8 ай бұрын
Never ever trust them. Never
@jacobl54888 ай бұрын
Thats true. Never trust the browns.
@mohakjain58028 ай бұрын
@@jacobl5488 That's such a racist remark.
@jinlee26178 ай бұрын
As a Nepali, you don't know but India is not better in land grabbing and stealing to political interference in Nepal.
@swapneelbehera2608 ай бұрын
With a name like jin Lee you say you are nepali😂😂.@@jinlee2617
@kaimanyu5868 ай бұрын
150 nations have joined China's BRI, cry more buddy....😂🤣
@oreo7538 ай бұрын
China's greed is on a different level. You'd think being one of the biggest country in the world will make them satisfied 😢
@John_Smith_868 ай бұрын
Not yet the biggest. More room to grow yet from expanding
@athena55668 ай бұрын
Yes they’ re also doing the same in the philippines
@kendysanchez42168 ай бұрын
Didn't stop Putin. But what do I know.
@TomNook.8 ай бұрын
Factually incorrect, and easily comparable. USA has similar landmass to China, at a quarter of the Chinese population. Yet they have several thousand (yes really) more military outposts around the world than china.
@John_Smith_868 ай бұрын
@@athena5566 Philippines is different. It is not a normal country. Even though China is still the bully, nonetheless
@Cal_4408 ай бұрын
China borders 14 countries and have border disputes with 17 countries (both land and sea) 😂
@rap32088 ай бұрын
Nah! Cure your ignorance and do a little research. The chinese have all settled its border disputes with all of the abutting nations except India and Bhutan, because India is a recalcitrant child and India holds the foreign policy of Bhutan. Nevertheless, Bhutan and China have a mutual understanding that is why they don't have any trouble.
@roadrash9998 ай бұрын
@@rap3208 China is acting like a baby since 1962, throwing tantrums over desert lands just because tibetans don't want to be friends with them.
@xbender5218 ай бұрын
A fake news creator, the most ignorant bias I've ever heard.
@roadrash9998 ай бұрын
@@rap3208 Reason for that is China has been acting like a baby since 1962, throwing tantrums just because the Tibetans don't want to be friends with them.
@roadrash9998 ай бұрын
@@rap3208 Reason for that is Chin has been acting like a baby since 1962, throwing tantrums just because the their own province don't want to be friends with them.
@johnjessie30838 ай бұрын
Bhutanese stand up ⬆️✊🏻✊🏻✊🏻
@kurtisbanner39658 ай бұрын
Native Americans stand up 😂😂
@LBLbLbbbb8 ай бұрын
@@kurtisbanner3965stop the whataboutism 😭. Classic Chinese bot response
@troy50948 ай бұрын
@@LBLbLbbbbfunny how there's no Bhutanese in the comment section
@dragonfly024907 ай бұрын
But it's being pressed down by India. A few years back, when there was a clash between Chinese and Indian armies in a disputed area between Bhutan and China. Chinese ask Indians "What are you doing here?" Chinese asked Bhutanese:"Did you invite them into your country?" Bhutanese didn't answer and say nothing. They were too afraid of Indians. The Indians run all over their country as though it's their own. If I were the Bhutanese, I would play them off each other and get the most benefits. Just like India being friends with Russia and the US, and buying Russian oil at a great discount and sell it at high profit to the Europeans.
@Bay-tshug7 ай бұрын
well I certainly am bhutanese
@lindseydoe40118 ай бұрын
Top 3 most greedy nation on earth. 1. China 2. Russia 3. North Korea
@JigilJigil8 ай бұрын
Very True.
@mohanbro222 ай бұрын
U forgot USA ?
@chandraravikumar25 күн бұрын
You skipped USA ‘cos it is so way above these that there is no competition?
@monkeyputin22 күн бұрын
💯
@asikurakash60668 ай бұрын
I will support Bhutan 🇧🇩❤️🇧🇹
@crytp0crux8 ай бұрын
I plan to publish an Encyclopedia of Chinese Border Disputes and Claims if only I can get it down to 84 beautiful terabytes.
@rap32088 ай бұрын
The only BORDER DISPUTE it has left is india and bhutan. It would have settled with Bhutan if India does not take care of its foreign policy. China settled with Russia, Mongolia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Myanmar, North Korea, Nepal, and Tajikistan. You encyclopedia wouldn't eve fill up a single page.
@ekevisit1836 ай бұрын
😂😂😂
@AbhishekVet037 ай бұрын
Tibet is an independent and Sovereign nation like Taiwan.
@i_love_tibet70014 ай бұрын
❤🙏🌈
@patrickkoh1056Ай бұрын
You sleeping for a thousand years?? Go ask UN, India, UK, etc
@sauganbikramshah979326 күн бұрын
So is Kashmir
@भारतीयहिंदू13 күн бұрын
@@sauganbikramshah9793 But king was Kashmir Raja Hari Singh and it's people Dogra rajput community (natives of Kashmir) decided to merge Kashmir with India already!
@Powroti6 ай бұрын
🇳🇵Nepal is really lucky to have the himalayas and sagarmatha (mt everest ) making china not be able expand .
@temper448 ай бұрын
It's interesting to see a British expert explain the land disputes around Asia. They have some great insights, considering the British were the ones who drew up these borders on a whim 150 years ago.
@TDurden5278 ай бұрын
It is impressive the number of places around the world that are in conflict now with borders that England created.
@stephenkolostyak40878 ай бұрын
@@TDurden527 not as impressive as how many commie apologists blame the U.S. for what the British created conditions for.
@alexmalt8 ай бұрын
Exhausting.
@Admiral-General_Aladeen8 ай бұрын
Who cares? Im not British but do we always want to be stuck in the past? What does it matter what happend back then? Why don't we go back a couple of hundred years more when china invaded the place? Is that how we resolve the conflicts of today by going back further and further and saying "i can't belive this country would do what basically every other country did throughout history"?
@JeanLooksPicard8 ай бұрын
@@TDurden527 It’s as if any of these conflicts didn’t exist in the prior borders before the British. The conflicts are made much more prominent because of technological and societal advancement and have nothing to do with any borders the British drew. This issue would likely exist regardless and it’s due to an imbalance of power and ideology between an incumbent power and its growing rival neighbour.
@vidyatheerthan8 ай бұрын
Thats why we call XiJinping a thief!
@soumilroy8 ай бұрын
Winnie the pooh needs to chill.
@torelloBank8 ай бұрын
USA needs to chill.
@paulsteaven8 ай бұрын
@cathie3874 the same way they're kicked out of Clark and Subic, then China built artificial islands inside Philippines' EEZ years later.
@QuakerOats16208 ай бұрын
Wumao trolls need to chill
@zkh1738 ай бұрын
@@QuakerOats1620 what's that? can't find in urban dictionary
Arunachal pradesh is integral part of India 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
@dungna54248 ай бұрын
It's integral part of China
@farfromhome808 ай бұрын
China give u it as beg
@rajatdani6198 ай бұрын
Ys, ofcourse.. Jai Hind.❤
@jimmylam98468 ай бұрын
Silly....Tibetan department had been collecting taxes in this area up to Assam border....Go check archives in Murthy library in Delhi.
@amateur_football97518 ай бұрын
You will have to show real military strength, China is not impressed or disuades by Modi's speeches or rhetoric.
@ProximaCentauri888 ай бұрын
Now I understand why India is supporting Southeast Asia esp. the Philippines when it comes to dealing with China's territorial agression.
@georgesibley71528 ай бұрын
India is blackmailing Bhutan by threatening to cut off its energy supply. India is the country that has made incursions into Nepal. But I suppose that is ok.
@davidgreer83858 ай бұрын
But India is BRICS.
@vivekmohanta23638 ай бұрын
At 0:59 India's eastern state arunachal pradesh is misrepresented as if not part of India. It's regretful to see such uninformed and unverified information put up by content creator
@Gaius_Julius_Caesar_Augustus8 ай бұрын
What r ya yapping about? The map is alright
@vivekmohanta23638 ай бұрын
Your comment establishes how these content creators misinform people
@karaki3698 ай бұрын
That's a disputed area, do you know what it means?
@Physics_Lad8 ай бұрын
Similarly Tibet is also a disputed area, why not show that as well.
@deanzaZZR8 ай бұрын
@@Physics_Lad "After Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee visit to China in June 2003, a joint declaration was signed in which India recognised that "the Tibet Autonomous Region is part of the territory of the People's Republic of China" - Wikipedia
@A.d.O.n8 ай бұрын
CHINA claiming all 🤣🤣🤣
@humbleindian63038 ай бұрын
India can reach Beijing through Arunachal , CCPs pressure point is Arunachal , thats why it claims Arunachal
@user-343-8fx8 ай бұрын
Tyrants will be defeated when the human race come together.
@calmbeast13298 ай бұрын
@@humbleindian6303not in a million years😂
@humbleindian63038 ай бұрын
@@calmbeast1329 do you know the length of indian missiles , from arunachal beijing is just 2000km our mid range missiles will reach beijing in minutes , all the industrial towns are within reach of arunachal pradesh, that is why beijing is nervous about arunachal pradesh, they already lost tawang in 1967
@luise54198 ай бұрын
@@humbleindian6303 well India has no record of attacking any country first. Unless china doesn't do their usual shenanigans they shouldn't worry about any missiles🤷♂️
@theultimateshield51338 ай бұрын
China has always done lowly things but taking advantage of such a country which doesn't even have an army and have always lived peacefully is a new level of low.
@rollbin8 ай бұрын
Yes so bad, we only fund some advanced infrastructure project in return, which is useless compared to democracy 😂
@ObscureManifesto8 ай бұрын
Tibet? It's not new
@eriksonyw8 ай бұрын
At least China didn't start WW1+2, didn't killed off the Native Americans or Aboriginals, didn't colonize and enslave half of the world's population, didn't steal tech of paper, didn't steal tech of locks, didn't steal tech of compass, didn't steal tech of money, & didn't commit the Holocaust. My apology for this lengthy comment, but kinda have to state the facts.
@picklewithinternet22548 ай бұрын
@@rollbin It happened in Tibet, it’s happening in Bhutan.
@3markaw8 ай бұрын
@@rollbin Keep your money greedy person. Nobody asked for your infrastructure project.
@sonamtobden83758 ай бұрын
Those heartless Chinese don't have the right to claim over the Bhutanese territory.Bhutan will never be under them. One day or the other every Chinese citizen will bear the suffering of what they had caused to other. Remember there's no one who escape from cause and effect. It's time for govt to take action.
@baikeiast52553 ай бұрын
😝😝😝😝😝😝😝😝
@AndreaDoesYoga8 ай бұрын
It's alarming how fast China is expanding 🌏
@ronzac558 ай бұрын
as it should i think. India must expand too. Western hegemony in international matter is too high
@AncountN.28 ай бұрын
its literally the slowest in 300 centuries
@YessEthan8 ай бұрын
India was fighting on behalf of bhutan in doklam plateu so... Dont think bhutan is small country India's iranclad support for bhutan is what we stand for freedom and integrity
@AncountN.28 ай бұрын
@@YessEthan Remember what India did to Nepal?
@downtomars62688 ай бұрын
@@YessEthan that is not what the Indian troop captain said, he said India crossed into Chinese border side to cut off any access to the Chicken's neck, nothing to do with Bhutan. Indian media say it was helping but Bhutan did not say India was helping.
@marcomarc1518 ай бұрын
Human greed at its finest
@manikkalore16308 ай бұрын
Chinese bots in full swing 😂
@GideonBett-o8u8 ай бұрын
Seems like the bots took the day 😂😂😂
@christopherwayne27618 ай бұрын
CIA liking machines on full power
@SoCalFreelance8 ай бұрын
Says the 100 SPAMBOTS saying the same thing.
@torelloBank8 ай бұрын
CIA bots in full swing😂
@Youdontshushh8 ай бұрын
@@torelloBank Wumao bots in full swing
@jloveestorgio86648 ай бұрын
greedy Chinese.
@Lordchungusmungus8 ай бұрын
Tiananmen Square and winnie the pooh
@BlinkShadow8 ай бұрын
CLASSICBOOMER TAKE !!! Now go back to sleep old man, its your bed time 😴😴😴
@roguetrader338 ай бұрын
this triggers the bot
@BlinkShadow8 ай бұрын
@@roguetrader33 meanwhile US is cracking down on anti-Israel protests lol Keep your hyprocrisy, both US and China can defenitely play the same game
@Brutalchaos28 ай бұрын
@@BlinkShadow US: Cracking down China: Gunning down NOT THE SAME
@roguetrader338 ай бұрын
@@BlinkShadow You were only paid 2 cents for that post bot, go back to the factory
@Gemarica8 ай бұрын
What about China’s new base in Sihanoukville, a port city in Cambodia on the Gulf of Thailand? China is everywhere.
@knoraziel8 ай бұрын
China? last time I check it was another country that have military bases around the world
@MithunOnTheNet8 ай бұрын
Hun Sen (Cambodia's dictator/leader), is former Khmer Rouge... which was backed by China. He relies on China's backing. Cambodia is basically a vassal state of China at this point. CCP can get what it wants from Hun Sen.
@Brandon88nyc8 ай бұрын
Us military base is everywhere
@deanzaZZR8 ай бұрын
Global trading superpowers build navy bases to protect sea lanes. See Portuguese, Dutch, British and American history.
@k3nshiro118 ай бұрын
Just like a virus.. Oh wait..
@wintaaaaa8 ай бұрын
China occupies Bhutanese land; Chinese Commenters: Bhutan's fault! Russia bombing Ukrainian houses; Russian Commenters: Ukraine's fault! Who are the one group who cries in pain as they strike you?
@GD-L808 ай бұрын
However, India should make its voice heard more in those areas. In my neck of the woods they say appetite comes with eating. I would not want China to encroach too much in those areas. I prefer Bhutan protected by India than under Chinese control.
@pulipakasrikiran93077 ай бұрын
Lol we need to grow economically first we have two developed ENEMIES us and china.
@ashecreates8 ай бұрын
Likewise Tibbet, Bhutan and Nepal will also suffer hard.
@christopherwayne27618 ай бұрын
Good-old British professor just can’t get over with the mess their empire left over everywhere.
@Xob_Driesestig8 ай бұрын
This comment would be appropriate if it was about the China-Hong Kong conflict, since Hong Kong was a British colony, but Bhutan has never been colonized by the UK (nor by any other western nation for that matter) so it doesn't really apply here.
@Shubham_Bahirat8 ай бұрын
Why would you drag UK everywhere, it's not their fault. China just don't agree any borders they have issues with every neighbour India, bhutan,Nepal, Vietnam, Indonesia, Taiwan, Japan, Philippines, Russia,
@christopherwayne27618 ай бұрын
@@Xob_Driesestig Guess who drew the border for northeastern India?
@amateur_football97518 ай бұрын
Classic Indian, that after 70 years of independence still blames the British for Indias problems, hates the Tag Mahal because it was built by the Mughals 😅😅
@ernestkj8 ай бұрын
8964
@King_verse_infinity8 ай бұрын
10yr old Chinese kid:- papa this whole world belongs to us.. Dad: how?? Kid:- i have seen world map in Chinese geography text book 📕 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@Kevin-bg3wu8 ай бұрын
The most beautiful, peaceful, "gross national happiness-before-gross national product" kingdom in the world has to deal with this. Please take care of them India.
@tipoomaster8 ай бұрын
Bhutan's best bet is an explicit alliance with India
@Harendra-v9t3 ай бұрын
But don't rely on india fully because india has to protect its own border too
@ayushbose5998 ай бұрын
China may illegally occupy but Bhutan will never give up claim to that region🇮🇳❤️🇧🇹
@suminshizzles69517 ай бұрын
You can claim it all you want but if china puts tank and guns on that land and plants a chinese flag on you are chit out of luck. This is what russia did with the crimea and this is why we canot allow communist nations and dictatorships to grab land whenever they want.
@kezey2794 ай бұрын
Yes, you are right! The thunder of land won't be back up 💪🇧🇹🇮🇳
@cornelishenk45693 ай бұрын
If china really wants it will claim
@Harendra-v9t3 ай бұрын
Fact is they will be surrendered if india don't protect them
@阿部机8 ай бұрын
Today is Wednesday, keyword: threatens (Monday, Wednesday, Friday)
@kaleeysmith88018 ай бұрын
why is ameriKKKa so aggressively trying to control the nations of the world?
@promahamedaxmed12748 ай бұрын
I suprise the chine Philosophy of capturing new lands of their neighbouring countries.
@Kevin-fq3zh8 ай бұрын
on chinese state run media the government constantly talks about “lost ancestral lands” in kazakhstan, tajikistan, india, outer mongolia, russia, etc. haha
@stephenkolostyak40878 ай бұрын
Why? The entire history of China is filled with stealing whatever they could think to steal from neighbors.
@Youdontshushh8 ай бұрын
@@Kevin-fq3zh wth those lost ancestral lands, this is not qing dynasty. F*** lost ancestral lands, thats not justifiable to steal others country. That thing is expired, outdated and total BS if China would still believe in such fantasy.
@李小白-x4v8 ай бұрын
@@Kevin-fq3zh Really? I only see Americans celebrating Thanksgiving and thanking the Indians for their land,lol~
@Youdontshushh8 ай бұрын
@@李小白-x4v how is that a response. Omg such mediocre being stated😂😂😂😂
@OkOk-qd2nc8 ай бұрын
How come Bhutan can't settle a boundary disputes with China without India's permission? Isn't Bhutan a sovereign country? To me it looks like India is the one who's middling in Bhutan foreign policy not China.
@frownezhang16328 ай бұрын
yes
@Jen-xg3iq8 ай бұрын
Bhutan has been bullied by India all the time.
@LearTrough8 ай бұрын
Bhutan has treaties with India. Yes, India has good control over it and Bhutan should have its sovereignty to decide its international relations. However, being on the Indian side means that India pushes them to have their defined territories by international boundaries respected. China has a bunch of border issues with everyone else and definitely does not resolve them diplomatically, but by force as we have seen recently. Bhutan will be able to do nothing to prevent Chinese military from encroaching on their territory.
@rickgolder68188 ай бұрын
Bhutan doesn't even recognises or have any diplomatic relations with china. It fears chinas expansion, as we have seen in case of tibet. Bhutan have no other choice but to increase relationship with india to counter china, and not get merged with china.
@jommzom97158 ай бұрын
Yeah we who what happened to Tibet, Bhutan ain't fool, they know history and history repeats.
@sagartomar34618 ай бұрын
Why Bhutan will give up land to get another piece of land what's the benefit Bhutan has in it .
@cliff3598 ай бұрын
因为印度不允许不丹和五常建交 不丹可怜啊!
@downtomars62688 ай бұрын
Bhutan is constantly under threat from India's colonial control.
@Guesswhokk8 ай бұрын
Let not forget how China take Tibet, if the nation refuses China's request.
@yerri55678 ай бұрын
@Guesswhokk Lets indeed not forget that Tibet had always been part of Chinas sovereign territory long than USA has been a country. Just because they illegally wanted to be their own country, doesnt mean they can. Its equivalent of Texas and some southern states wanting to be their own country without the approval of USA. What do you think will happen?
@NarasimhaDiyasena8 ай бұрын
@@yerri5567first of all ‘China’ didn’t exist when Tibet was under dynastic control, and the control was never continuous but on and off, and never imposing but equal..,
@yerri55678 ай бұрын
@@NarasimhaDiyasena First of all, "China" is what the West calls the Middle Kingdom. Its always existed since time immemorial. Secondly, we are talking about "sovereignty" here, not "control". China had sovereignty over Tibet for longer than USA has been a country, its set in stone, in black and white. There a legal documents to prove it. They allowed Tibet the authority to govern themselves, but make no mistake, sovereignty was still Chinas. Thats the difference between sovereignty and "control". And once the last Chinese Dynasty came to an end, there was an imperial edict (what we call treaty nowadays) that stated that sovereignty over Tibet was to be handed over to the next "China". Ie it was continuous. Everything was enshrined in law. That is why Tibet wanting to be their own little country was illegal. China rightfully took back control when they violated the law first.
@i_love_tibet70014 ай бұрын
@@yerri5567 China can bran wash their citizens and change the history book, but The Truth will always remain Truth......... Tibet was Never been part of China. In fact, our mighty King in the 7th Century once conquered China.
@athomdelatorre63668 ай бұрын
Thats china greed in all aspect
@midcent73b8 ай бұрын
Countries need to coordinate efforts to counter China's expansionist aggression.
@JonJon-wc6pj8 ай бұрын
Ofcourse, China owns everything that those tiny eyes can reach. All hail Winnie Xi the overlord master of galaxy!
@danceoffAsh8 ай бұрын
You can show disdain for a country's political and geographic agenda but do not make discriminatory remarks about their enthinicty/race. We're better than that.
@@danceoffAsh Is it racist to call Winnie as Winnie? 😂😂
@ねるちゃん-g7c8 ай бұрын
chinese bots everywhere😆😆😆
@Chiao00038 ай бұрын
我只能看到达利特们自嗨🤣
@Youdontshushh8 ай бұрын
@cathie3874 why would we cry, ur just chinese. HAHAHAHA, paper dragon
@Chiao00038 ай бұрын
@@Youdontshushh India no.1
@QuakerOats16208 ай бұрын
Wumao bots all over the place
@DemocraticMonarchy8 ай бұрын
@@Chiao0003 just like slave trade in qing dynasty
@ga84668 ай бұрын
chineese bots be crazy
@RDd1888 ай бұрын
Bhutanese ❤ from India.
@raylee50308 ай бұрын
Ha ha. Bhutanese are relatives of Tibetans. They don't look Indian.
@frownezhang16328 ай бұрын
It is hoped that Bhutan can gain independent sovereignty, especially diplomatic sovereignty. Avoid becoming the second Sikkim.
@prnvgnsn8 ай бұрын
@@frownezhang1632same with Tibbet
@RDd1888 ай бұрын
@@raylee5030 Hahah Chinese BoT getting so predictable 😅 comeon atleast stand up to Xipingpong expectations.
@DemocraticMonarchy8 ай бұрын
@@frownezhang1632 india respects bhutans sovergnity better than china does
@voranartsirisubsoontorn8 ай бұрын
Fact is CCP would like to expand into everywhere as far as actions have shown.
@luishernandezblonde8 ай бұрын
It seems to be a trend of China's massive militarisation. Almost every border of neighbours, even on the sea, Chinese military is rapidly militarising. The only neighbour it doesn't militarise... is Russia, but that wasn't a surprise given Russia's status as China's minor partner.
@phoenix50548 ай бұрын
China is now making claims even on Russian territory. China is not a peaceful neighbor.
@mohakjain58028 ай бұрын
but even China and Russia have some territorial disputes. I have no idea why China would want to make all their neighbors, enemies for no apparent reason for some little land.
@luishernandezblonde8 ай бұрын
@@mohakjain5802 Russia is too weak to do anything now, and even if Russia managed to somehow subjugate Ukraine into its realm, it could not stand against China's demands since Chinese troops are far more modern, more capable and more advanced than Russian army. Pakistan is China's long time ally, so no reason to militarise. The rest? Their territories were parts of the Chinese Empire at some point under various dynasties, such as the Han, Tang, Yuan and Qing. That's why China want them back.
@plume898 ай бұрын
@@mohakjain5802to “make China great again” ,my country is on chauvinism mode
@designengrwafu53108 ай бұрын
@@luishernandezblondeRussia nuclear deterrence are for China 😂
@Aritra_Tozo8 ай бұрын
It's really not a funny mistake that China is taking what belongs to your country (Bhutan/India/Japan/Vietnam/South China Sea = East Asia Sea). Claiming Tibetan region, which was forcefully annexed by them. So no Claims has any basic requirement to fill the whole China is digging for the coffins of the future conflicts. India will stand with Bhutan and Bhutanese people will get the best version of Chinese love game no where before the disintegration of the Red colour (product).
@chadparsons508 ай бұрын
Why doesn't India sign a mutual defense pact with Bhutan? Or an agreement to build a base in Bhutan?
@bladeqmaster8 ай бұрын
China 🇨🇳, they'll bring the world map and draw the dashes
@degol56928 ай бұрын
I think that was the British.
@Im-mono8 ай бұрын
US simply: All Mine~
@jayantrana73898 ай бұрын
Noo keep dreaming and coping 😂 USA should care about it's school first @@Im-mono
@simondan46688 ай бұрын
I thought the Bhutan government stated that China has not taken their territory and it was India who raised the question.
@eriksonyw8 ай бұрын
Yup. & India didn't even raise any question. The vid clearly said towards the end that India didn't want to comment on foreign affairs between Bhutan and China.
@wretfsfvd8 ай бұрын
India didn't even comment on that, it was some youtuber news channels(10k-20k subscriber), who made report on that and WSJ post this video that Indian media is posting about that, it means Indian gov have problem
@snowlee-ml7rr8 ай бұрын
In 1975, Sikkim was annexed by India. Bhutan, as a neighboring country, is not stupid. The Bhutan are a country established by Tibetans after migration. Bhutan and Tibet have the same culture and ethnicity. Bhutan is very different from India, both in culture and ethnicity. Bhutan's diplomacy and military are controlled by India. The British Empire left Bhutan, but Bhutan have to meet the Indians who have no bottom line. The key is that the per capita GDP of Tibet is seven more times that of India. As a result, Indians covet the land of Tibet every day and say that they want to liberate Tibet. In the eyes of other countries, it is similar to North Korea saying that it wants to rescue Americans out of poverty.
@LearTrough8 ай бұрын
@@snowlee-ml7rr Sikkim monarch rebels voted to join India. The fact that you post such blatant misinformation shows that you have an agenda. China annexed Tibet by invading it and the Dalai Lama became a refugee in India. Now China is building villages in Bhutan, spraying water cannons at the Phillipines and always threatening to attack Taiwan. Everyone knows who the bully is. Go check Wikipedia and all these facts online for verification. India has received Tibetans with open arms because Tibetans have fled excess authoritarianism and cultural attacks by the communist Chinese governement. And also, Bhutan does not have an active military.
@SurajMandal-lj6hc8 ай бұрын
@@snowlee-ml7rr lol the Sikkim parliament himself sign on the proposal of annexation with India.
@w.e.47598 ай бұрын
Same tactic China is using on South China Sea. I remembered a TV Series I watch when I was a kid where the lead character asked the Mongolian Khan, "Of all the expansion you are doing, how much land do you need to bury your corpse?" After 5000 years of history, China still has not learnt all. Look at the Roman, how great was it to have one man ruled all?
@nike54288 ай бұрын
Remember!! not just for India, the red China is issue for everyone. TAIWAN!!! **cough** **cough**
@singatakberpura8 ай бұрын
India is keeping its taiwan card for the main event dont worry
@phoenixdown19478 ай бұрын
@user-ii2lm6kg2g China is West taiwan there was never a china.😂
@emegulle36308 ай бұрын
@user-ii2lm6kg2greally? Last time i checked Taiwan is a free democracy. Perhaps i need a refresher 😅
@charmjasmi8 ай бұрын
it seems like Taiwan case is more aggressive, but actually not, like the cases with PHP, Vietnam, Burma, Japan, India, Bhutan caused by china is still going parallel. China is igniting the problems with all its neighbors
@emegulle36308 ай бұрын
@user-ii2lm6kg2g yes... one country under Taiwan, since they wrote it.😁😁😁
@shibak48 ай бұрын
When China does it it's called land grab. When Israel does it it's called land expropriation. Regarding accusations of land grab against Israel as "antisemitic" is not hypocritical AT ALL!
@Youdontshushh8 ай бұрын
Oh yes, china is israel 2.0 with gaslighting characteristics
@thinkie128 ай бұрын
There are 22 Arab nations, and only one tiny Israel. And that land also belongs to Israel. In fact, Ancient Israel is very much bigger than now.
@thinkie128 ай бұрын
If an Indian couple migrated to Europe, and then, they give birth to children. Then, they decided to go back to India. So, when they go back to India, had they become European or are they still Indians.
@shibak48 ай бұрын
@@thinkie12 Your example doesn't represent the reality and has nothing to do with the current state of Israel. A representative example is this: Can an Iranian decide to go to India and occupy some piece of land because it used to be a part of Persian Empire? and the answer is no. India belongs to Indians. The Iranian can apply as an immigrant to go and live in his/her supposedly ancestoral land in India but if the application is successful, he/she will be a citizen of Indian. India won't be turned into Persia unless it's occupied by a large number of Iranians through the use of force and genocide! Just because your ancestors used to live somewhere centuries ago (or worse, because your "God" told you so) some foreign land won't belong to you.
@thinkie128 ай бұрын
@@shibak4 You didn't really understand the land of Palestine. The land of Palestine consisted of Israel and Jordan. There have never been a Palestinian state. Can you name any Prime Minister of Palestinian state. None. There is region called Palestine but never a country called Palestine. Due to war in that region like the Babylonian War, Assyrian War, the Ottoman Empire, Roman Empire, so Jews were dispersed and flee from the war, but not all Jews left that region. There were many Jews that remained there. In 1947, the UN partitioned the land of Palestine into two. One piece for Israel, and one for the Arabs. So, back then, there were already a two state solution. The Jews got 23% of the land of Palestine and they called it Israel and the Arabs got 77% of the land of Palestine and it was called Transjordan. Today it is called Jordan. The so called Palestinian today were actually Arabs. There were Jordanians. Some are from Egypt, Tunisia, Morocco, Syria, Iraq and Lebanon. Israel is legit. The UN had voted on it in 1947, and it passed the resolution. kzbin.infoWnGl-TFaiuM
@Matungao02178 ай бұрын
notorious LAND-GRABBER anywhere in the world. SHAMELESS
@duran96648 ай бұрын
Bhutan should merge with Nepal to be Butty & Nepals 🤷♀️
@dtmt5028 ай бұрын
Bhutan treated Nepalese refugees poorly
@sanjiblimbu46618 ай бұрын
No, Thank you.
@S1996V8 ай бұрын
Nepal can't defend its territory from Chinese occupation so how can they defend Bhutan😅
@prembhandari28768 ай бұрын
Nepal should merge with Bhutan
@WuhanVirusFAKU8 ай бұрын
Nepal is already a part of China.
@PomegranateChocolate8 ай бұрын
We cannot talk about Bhutan without talking about Sikkim. Like Bhutan, Sikkim was an independent Himalayan Buddhist kingdom many hundreds of years old and a neighbor of China. Sikkim was briefly overrun by the Nepalese Gorkhas during the 18th century. The Sikkim king fled to China and asked for help. The then Qianlong emperor dispatched an expedition force to Sikkim and expelled the Gorkhas and restored Sikkim's sovereignty and independence. Sikkim was left unmolested for the rest of its history until it was gobbled up by the artificial country India in 1975. Chinese of older generations were taught that Sikkim was one of China's neighbors. Even student in Taiwan (Republic of China) were taught Sikkim was one of China's neighbors until a couple of decades ago. Bhutan is very similar to Sikkim in terms of ethnicity, language, religion and culture and history, only that it is bigger. Bhutan is in a precarious situation right now because it is the next low hanging fruit in India's expansionism and is currently militarily occupied by India. The reason I wrote this here is to educate the people in the world what is going on in that part of the world and stop indulging India, a country that is up to no good.
@Kavino8 ай бұрын
India is useful to the west so the media doesn't talk about India's expansionism AT ALL.
@TAUNDER.8 ай бұрын
Why do you think Bhutan is occupied by Indian military. Bhutan doesn't have its military infrastructure India helps Bhutan to provide safety . India also include more than billion dollars aid from its budget to Bhutan it is highest among all the neighbours
@PomegranateChocolate8 ай бұрын
@@TAUNDER. Provide safety for what? Bhutan is a neighbor of China for many hundreds of years before the artificial country India even existed. Who was providing safety for Bhutan then? I am not going to mince words. The reason Bhutan is occupied by India militarily is because India has territorial design on Bhutan and the first step to gobble up Bhutan is to totally control it. This is the reason India is so allergic for Bhutan having diplomatic countries with most countries. Please do not lie. India is not providing billions of dollars aid to Bhutan. India debt trapped Bhutan for its infrastructure projects. I read from a Bhutanese India's interest rate to Bhutan is 10%, two and a half times the rate of international norm.
@PomegranateChocolate8 ай бұрын
@@TAUNDER. Provide safety for what? Bhutan is a neighbor of China for many hundreds of years before the artificial country India even existed. Who was providing safety for Bhutan then? I am not going to mince words. The reason Bhutan is occupied by India militarily is because India has territorial design on Bhutan and the first step to gobble up Bhutan is to totally control it. This is the reason India is so allergic for Bhutan having diplomatic countries with most countries. Please do not lie. India is not providing billions of dollars aid to Bhutan. India debt trapped Bhutan for its infrastructure projects. I read from a Bhutanese India's interest rate to Bhutan is 10%, two and a half times the rate of international norm.
@barba9288 ай бұрын
Sikkim is doing just fine now. Being one of "China's neighbors" is scary, if they weren't part of India, you would be using your 18th century obscure politics as justification to destroy their culture and take over
@gj12345678999998 ай бұрын
How is China allowed to build on other countries???
@emegulle36308 ай бұрын
Ask a thief.. they will also lie about it 😅
@silversurfergw8 ай бұрын
Not to worry, Indian military has been present in the streets of butan for quite a while.
@whysoserious75538 ай бұрын
Chyna : mine mine mine mine
@kezey2794 ай бұрын
Not easy bruh, The thunder of land won't back up 💪💀
@madhavyu8 ай бұрын
Modi is a mediocre PM so China isn´t worried about India doing anything about this.
@noterrormanagement8 ай бұрын
If China "wasn't worried" they'd be in New Delhi by now.
@prometheus73878 ай бұрын
Under Modi, India has pursued a more hawkish foreign policy stance. They've increased cooperation with the US and its allies and have been ramping up their military, which is in contrast to the previous Congress government. China certainly has an upper hand against India right now but it has more of a reason to worry as compared to the past.
@Kevin-fq3zh8 ай бұрын
@@prometheus7387you can stop dreaming. washington knows u cannot be trusted. you are the reason why the Quad is a mere talkshop
@Kevin-fq3zh8 ай бұрын
@@prometheus7387 uncle sam doesnt trust you because you turned quad into a talkshop
@backemf898 ай бұрын
@@noterrormanagement step by step. but very soon
@ronnieboucherthecrystalcraftsm8 ай бұрын
china has inter continental ballistic missiles = made from paper - untraceable and a rocket program of - sending missiles from TIBET TO ANY CAPITOL IN THE WORLD ! = just saying what i learnt 15 years ago !
@SteveGerrard-pe3fg8 ай бұрын
As long as India or world doesn't give Tibetan freedom this problem wil go on... Before there was no borders between Tibet.. India.. Bhutan
@i_love_tibet70014 ай бұрын
Absolutely. There was only peace and interconnected before. Now, everywhere is becoming nightmare due to China influence. Nepal used to be safe heaven for Tibetans, not any more. 😢
@LAURA-oz8ls8 ай бұрын
They are territorially aggressive since their own history begun. Starts with ancient feudalism and followed by thousand years with imperial expansion, they fought wherever they could and only stopped where they couldn't reach.
@lmarchand85268 ай бұрын
Noooo! Bhutan is one of the sanest countries, if not THE sanest country in the world. Or at least it was under the late King, I read several years ago. He did some great things, my favourite being that he amended the Constitution so that a sizeable percentage of the country would never be developed at all for ANY human interests, profit, etc. Still a ways to go socially, especially for women, but he was thoughtfully leading the country forward and people's lives were improved. I don't know how the conversion from monarchy to democracy he instituted is going.... I'll have to update my reading. But the idea that China is grabbing land, and sending settlers there!!! How long before they start mining or whatever in Bhutan's constitutionally protected wild zones?? Forgive me, I am so sick of the already most powerful nations of the world always picking on, bullying smaller ones just to get more, always more...
@LandGrabbingIndia8 ай бұрын
Two out of the best 3 space agencies of the World (Russia/USA/China) said India did not land on Moon's South Pole. 1) NASA specifically said "The Chandrayaan-3 landing site is located about 600 kilometers from the Moon’s South Pole.". This is just another diplomatic way of saying India did not land on Moon's South Pole. If India had landed on on Moon's South Pole, NASA would have simply said that "The Chandrayaan-3 landing site is located at the Moon’s South Pole" instead of "The Chandrayaan-3 landing site is located about 600 KILOMETERS FROM the Moon’s South Pole. 2) Dr Ouyang Ziyuan, lauded as the father of China’s lunar exploration programme, told the Chinese-language Science Times newspaper that the Chandrayaan-3 landing site, at 69 degrees south latitude, was nowhere close to the pole, defined as between 88.5 and 90 degrees.
@sajidbinmahamud46058 ай бұрын
"that look like military installations" . . .
@recon178 ай бұрын
civillian-military fusion is part of china's gameplan. Its the same way they sell weapons to Russia.
@hylimm8 ай бұрын
What’s so surprising??
@StupidDanimations8 ай бұрын
It's amazing how dictators are incapable of not grabbing land that isn't theirs.
@Olive_Chap8 ай бұрын
Doklam crisis of 2017 resulted in India officially moving into Bhutanese territory to stop PLA. Stopping & physically phusing Chinese troop & construction worker out of the border as define by Bhutan & India.. though chinese did construct road upto their territory.. had US pushed PLAN & PLARF out of SCS.. CCP won't dare to do this.. anyways the way India is constructing road, bridges & military infra along LAC is good for power dynamics.. India recently move two offensive corps toward china beside defensive corps already takling PLA & giving golgappas to CCP's goons
@ChotenTshering-ou8hx8 ай бұрын
Why Bhutan leader were silence when construction going on
@thetreekeeper1438 ай бұрын
Because they need development to get out of poverty. They don't want to be stuck in the dark ages.
@CHL419938 ай бұрын
Because that is well within the line of control, the de fatco border. WSJ just doesn't like the fact that China-India border area is too peacful last year, so they feel like stiring it up a little bit.
@MileyCyrusPartyUSA7 ай бұрын
*NOTE: Many of the comments here are from Chinese government sponsored trollbots*
@deanzaZZR8 ай бұрын
Seems that Bhutan is not fully sovereign to make its own decisions. Why not a news story on a UN member nation not having full autonomy in foreign relations?
@frownezhang16328 ай бұрын
It is hoped that Bhutan can gain independent sovereignty, especially diplomatic sovereignty. Avoid becoming the second Sikkim.
@xisanbhuiyan70918 ай бұрын
India is controlling its foreign policy by threatening otherwise India will occupie Bhutan just like sikkim neighbour country of Bhutan.
@rangoman18158 ай бұрын
@@frownezhang1632 Sikkim is happy to be under India
@NoFrillz-G8 ай бұрын
@@rangoman1815you sure about that we all know they are called chinki by your own Indian citizens
@borissergijevic73578 ай бұрын
I’m looking at China's growth into Bhutan and comparing it to Israel’s spread into Palestine, but it’s tough. Like, China builds a couple houses and roads, and the West complains, but then the West is okay with Israel.
@gamingchannelofthefatboigo25958 ай бұрын
If I understand israel got attacked pretty badly on thier soil by the largest militant group on Palestine. So It made sense they tried to establish Israel controlled places around Palestine. Of course it doesnt justify the killing of civilians, becouse they got like 4 days to plan the invasion and from every 1 militant they instead kill 10 civilians. So they justify it to the west with the explanation I said at the start
@cliff3598 ай бұрын
其实留言里 几乎没有不丹人发表意见,只看到印度人无能狂怒!和马尔代夫 斯里兰卡 一模一样
@Nationfirstalwaysfirst_IND8 ай бұрын
Shame on China grabbing land from Bhutan n Nepal like small country.
@zhidiyang8 ай бұрын
India invaded Sikkim, which is adjacent to Bhutan, and annexed it entirely in 1975. For Bhutan, their greater fear is India.
@alansmods17758 ай бұрын
That doesn't mean China is good lol.... Idk what you are saying is true but China is way more a threat than India.
@rockyjohnson17758 ай бұрын
Here comes the Chinese and Pakistani bot speaking about freedom…
@PomegranateChocolate8 ай бұрын
@@alansmods1775 All the small kingdoms coexist peacefully with China for hundreds of years (Ladakh, Sikkim, Bhutan) unmolested. Once India happened (an artificial country that historically does not exist) two were gobbled up by India, the last one left, Bhutan is militarily occupied by India. China's South Tibet (so-called Arunachal Pradesh) itself is occupied by India. And China is a threat?
@darkodonnie27298 ай бұрын
@@PomegranateChocolate😂😂😂 China invaded Tibet, inner Mongolia, Xinjiang. Here comes the online soldiers of winnie the pooh from commie propaganda department 😂😂
@PomegranateChocolate8 ай бұрын
@hj2711 The subcontinent never have a unified polity until the British arrived and created a country out of the thousands of fiefdoms cobbled together. India existed for only seventy plus years. There is no relation whatsoever between Tibet and the make-up country India.
@PoomiPoorPoo8 ай бұрын
Hermits, Monks, & LLAMAS!!!
@myexplorations59618 ай бұрын
Oysters, clams and cockles !!!
@beyondthetimescape8 ай бұрын
Daily reminder: TAIWAN IS A COUNTRY.
@babahanuman838 ай бұрын
Factually wrong. Wake up!
@snehamathew80448 ай бұрын
I love WSJ, my favorite KZbin channel ❤
@Bay-tshug7 ай бұрын
the Bhutanese government rejected a treaty with China where the Chinese would give a large portion of land in the other locations of the country for a small portion in the western part, the Bhutanese government still keeps the treaty with India and are true people
@Red.bulldozer38 ай бұрын
Bhutan can take cue from Modi that no bhutan land is lost during Modi rule😂
@singatakberpura8 ай бұрын
India has never lost land to china. India took over kailash heights from china btw 😂
@singatakberpura8 ай бұрын
China lost kailash heights
@Red.bulldozer38 ай бұрын
@@singatakberpura nice story telling😂 Did modi told you india never lost land?😂
@singatakberpura8 ай бұрын
@@Red.bulldozer3 Lol we know he didnt lose land and we know the secretive establishment 22 of Indian army took over Kailash Heights from the chinese. It overlooks all chinese positions 🤣
@Red.bulldozer38 ай бұрын
@@singatakberpura is kailash range heights still occupied by indians? The last i heard they vacated these strategic range for some minor chinese adjustment in pangso lake😂
@jimmylam98468 ай бұрын
It was a land deal between two countries by swapping particularly Doglam area where Bhutan wanted a buffer zone to be created so it doesn't end up like the Kingdom of Sikkim in 1975 which was swallowed by India.
@sagartomar34618 ай бұрын
Kingdom of Sikkim was the part of India like Puerto Rico of USA not like Bhutan which is a different country
@sagartomar34618 ай бұрын
@@Davids-e7k and it wasn't independent it was a vessel state of India Sikkimese were hindus before India annexed it like nepal is hindu . No one changed their graphics. Even bhuddism was born in India
@SurajMandal-lj6hc8 ай бұрын
@@Davids-e7k people of Sikkim still have right to practice their religion freely unlike communist China.
@SurajMandal-lj6hc8 ай бұрын
@@Davids-e7k people have rights to choose their religion according to them so what is your problem if some Sikkimese become Hindu.
@GargiSingh-op2je8 ай бұрын
Atleast people of Sikkim are prospering unlike tibetans
@SaurabhSrivastava-b7q8 ай бұрын
India is Bhutan's best friend and nothing will happen to Bhutan despite India's presence.   Feedback
@fire_fly_0073 ай бұрын
as long as *
@techxtv3578 ай бұрын
In India we're currently busy with elections. We are currently using divide and rule policy and don't want our citizens to know what's really happening because it will hinder election results
@Mr.Atypical8 ай бұрын
That's news is 3-4 months old. Government already knows the issue that's why Modi visited Bhutan a month ago and Bhutan has become more concerned about India's concerns otherwise Bhutan was just ready to give up.
@techxtv3578 ай бұрын
@@Mr.Atypical so what about china grabbing thousands of acres of land? why doesn't ModiXi say regarding that matter too? He just dares to speak against Muslims in India and doesn't dare to utter a word against china.
@soowo59428 ай бұрын
Bhutan has no problem, but India does.
@cosmos68738 ай бұрын
They do too, once you handle big fish, small fish are easier to take over.
@mohakjain58028 ай бұрын
BTW how much CCP pays you people to write this propaganda. Bhutan has no issues? How can you be so delusional? That place which the Chinese occupied has a lot of religious significance for Bhutan and that's why the Chinese decided to encroach over there.
@rickgolder68188 ай бұрын
They dont want there situation like tibet, so they have problems.
@soowo59428 ай бұрын
@hj2711 China and Bhutan have their sorted out all their boder issues, ready to sign border treaty. But imperial India doesn't want. Weak India trying hard to be imperlistic. Pathetic!
@baikeiast52553 ай бұрын
India have nothing in common with Bhutan 😅😅😅😅😅😅
@RDd1888 ай бұрын
Nothing New all in the Public domain already. Bhutan King was in New Delhi a few months ago regarding this after visiting Beijing. WSJ come on don't lag 6month behind.
@superduper31308 ай бұрын
Bhutan needs to merge themeselves with INDIA, thats the last chance
@pisablavatsky-cb3dd8 ай бұрын
"Wherever and whenever two neighbors quarrels, this mean an angl0man passed by"
@nomdeguerre20038 ай бұрын
Similarly India is building road and military installations inside western Nepal border.
@soumengorai83468 ай бұрын
🤣🤣🤣kalapani nepal🇳🇵 part of India🇮🇳
@privacyhelp8 ай бұрын
Bhutan is an independent country, free to cooperate with whom it wishes. India has no right to interfere.
@MRT-co1sd8 ай бұрын
Bhutan is controlled by India.
@SatabdiKundu078 ай бұрын
We pay for their fuel, energy, food, internet, so will f**king interfare.
@iceteazen8 ай бұрын
India and Bhutan are allies.
@城市野狗5 ай бұрын
@@SatabdiKundu07 你为什么要支付?
@ShitSkinsIndian8 ай бұрын
It seems that |ndia/|ndians have clearly forgotten that |ndia was the one who |nvaded Sikkim on year 1973 before annexing Sikkim to become one of |ndian states on year 1975. The last Chogyal king of Sikkim, Palden Thongdu Namygal, was placed under house arrest and was tortured by |ndia till he died in 1975. Miraculously, after making an example out of the Sikkim King, Sikkim became part of |ndia on year 1975 but not on 1973 when |ndia |nvaded Sikkim. If the sovereign country of Sikkim is willing to become one with |ndia, is an invasion necessary? Is a house arrest and the killing of the King of Sikkim necessary?
@darkodonnie27298 ай бұрын
Majority of sikkimese population is in Army, they don't even like Chinese, now cope 4 foot rice farmer.
@ShitSkinsIndian8 ай бұрын
@@darkodonnie2729 says the 2.5 foot cur rimun cher. World Population Review says: Average height of Indian men (age 19) = 166.5 and the Average height of Chinese men (age 19) =175.66. 🤭
@ShitSkinsIndian8 ай бұрын
@@darkodonnie2729 Indians are defeated by the Chinese in the 1962 war. It was the most humiliating defeat in history if you were to examine all the facts that were involved in the war. This is the ultimate proof that war tactics/strategy/determination/will power/bravery triumphs over superior weapons/technology/cowardice. 1) The Chinese were having the "great Chinese famine" from 1658 to 1962. China was too weak to defend itself. 2) India had Israeli and American support in the form of supplies/weaponry. Research on "Israel aid to India in the 1962 war" and "America's aid to India in the 1962 war" and "JFK’s Forgotten Crisis". 3) The Sino-Soviet split from 1960 - 1962. China had nothing. No weapons, guns, artillery supplies from either Western and Soviet and no food (serious famine). 4) Despite all these advantages, India lost. 5) There are no excuses for such a humiliating defeat. That is why India is so desperate to have the "Henderson Brooks and Neville Maxwell report of the 1962 war" concealed forever and also to hide which country is the true aggressor of the war. When it was leaked into the internet momentarily in 2014, India demanded the report to be purged permanently from the internet citing "national security"....just like BBC's documentary on the 2002 Gujarat Massacre and Modi's involvement.
@ShitSkinsIndian8 ай бұрын
@@darkodonnie2729 China claimed that they won in the 1962 war and provided 1) Video proof for example, "The crushing moment: China India 1962 war - Part 1" and "The crushing moment: China India 1962 war - Part 2" 2) Territory Trophy Aksai Chin 1962 3) Indian prisoners of war captured India claimed that they won in the 1967 "war", a 3-day battle from 11/09/1967 to 14/09/1967 (Nathu La), and provided 1) No video proof 2) No territorial victory 3) No Chinese prisoners of war captured. 😁😆😅🤣😂All historians said that the 1967 "war" was not a war but only a "skirmish". ➡How the U.S. viewed the 1967 Sikkim skirmishes between India and China (Brookings)🔚 🤭😅😂Noticed that they had use "skirmish" rather than "war".
@ShitSkinsIndian8 ай бұрын
@@darkodonnie2729 Why do all military rankings rank China above India? 🤣🤭😂1962? Wait, didn't the Indians claimed that they had won in the 1967 "war"? The score should be even like China: 1 and India:1 on paper? Oh wait again, all historians said there is no war between China and India in 1967 but only a small 3 day skirmish from 11/09/1967 to 14/09/1967 😅🤣😂Read article "How the U.S. viewed the 1967 Sikkim skirmishes between India and China (Brookings)". I guess that is the reason why China > India. 🤭😂
@ShitSkinsIndian8 ай бұрын
China detonated their first hydrogen bomb on midair, dated 17 June 1967 and prior to that, had done an atomic bomb detonation dated 16 October 1964.