Why Claude Monet's Meules à Giverny is an Impressionist Masterpiece | Sotheby's

[@fahdh.a1590]

Fabulous

[@nicolasmuzzupappa7807]

Genius.

[@grokeffer6226]

Nice!!

[@serg..]

Крутой .

[@guldenaydin9918]

💝

[@a.anderson_1]

You can find a painting for 20-30 dollars with that level of detail. Bob Ross used to do them in 20-30min on his show. 'Monet'

[@scottbranham4839]

Looks like a big strawberry..!

[@brianlawson363]

Another predictable, convoluted, and overly worded "analysis" by an "expert" or "specialist". The term masterpiece has become the most overused and applied description of any work of art these people deal with. " Les Meules a Giverny" is technically a great work but it is most certainly NOT a masterpiece. The painting is not unique in its construction, in representation, and is not, most importantly, unique in its effect. Masterpieces are rare and it is high time the word is applied only when it is truly applicable.

[@grokeffer6226]

Whatever you say, Einstein. 🤡

[@joecalabresi4072]

It is not a stellar example

[@LDVTennis]

What do you expect? It's Sotheby's. It's social media. But, yes, you are correct...

[@dear_darling]

Somebody hand Mr Brian a Xanax

[@nelsonx5326]

Masterpiece is the right word. This painting is absolutely amazing. Can almost smell the atmosphere. It breathes light. It is more realistic than the Mona Lisa. More realistic than the super realists. And it does this without the painter trying to be realistic. I could look at this painting every day. It's effect calming.