If only Kelly Moneymaker had bailed out the Panama colony. I mean, controlling the Panama isthmus is a pretty solid idea on paper.
@JarrodFratesАй бұрын
If you're going to do things at places far away with lots of water in between, you need lots of ships with guns. England had already figured out that part, and so had Spain. Scotland hoped to prove that it wasn't necessary, and Spain proved them wrong.
@GamesTwiceOverАй бұрын
That would have made everything a little too easy, I'm afraid.
@LexlutherVIIАй бұрын
He was busy with saving Nederlands 😂
@markstott6689Ай бұрын
The Scots couldn't have picked a worse spot in central America. Tropical rainforest, mountains, and swamps. The Darien Gap, even in the 21st century, is still untamed. With malaria and other tropical diseases, it's still a hell hole for human beings native to the area. For European settlers, it was a disaster waiting to happen. There's a break in the transcontinental road as the Darien Gap is still uncrossed by any kind of paved road. Even if the Scots settlers had unlimited Moneymaker and a large Navy to protect them, I suspect that the colony would still have failed.
@wentoneisendon6502Ай бұрын
Spinning 3 plates had already colonised them
@bigblue6917Ай бұрын
The problem with the Panama colony is that the land belonged to Spain and if Spain was not busy fighting England the Scots would have been removed sooner.
@christianweibrecht6555Ай бұрын
Seriously I wonder why they believed colonizing Spanish territory would’ve been profitable
@TheDanEdwardsАй бұрын
"The problem with the Panama colony is that the land belonged to Spain"
@shorewallАй бұрын
@@TheDanEdwards Don't be coy, you know how colonialism works.
@hirocheeto7795Ай бұрын
@@TheDanEdwards *Should* Spain have owned it is a different question than *whether* Spain owned it. On the world stage, guns and practicality outweigh morality. This is a bad thing, naturally, but it's the fact of the matter.
@samiamrg7Ай бұрын
It didn’t help that the Scots were also not very good at settling in rough, tropical terrain and chose a region which is to this day sparsely populated due to the unforgiving terrain.
@RoyalKingOliverАй бұрын
I know History Matters has a lot of iconic lines But it would be hilarious if one of his videos had his “But Fun Fact…” followed up by a “Yes” instead of a “No”
@davepratt9909Ай бұрын
It would be the most paused/replayed line as 1.7M viewers go, "What??"
@adamwarlock1Ай бұрын
Yes! It should be for some unexpectedly positive decision someone made. "No one expected Napoleon to agree to Britain's peace offer, but fun fact...yes!"
@JenniferinIllinoisАй бұрын
If that ever happened, the world as we know it will end.
@brendantreynor7876Ай бұрын
I don't think James Bisonette will allow it 😂😂😂
@DarthGTBАй бұрын
That would be a great April fools joke. - Fun fact: Yes - It raises the question: When?
@joshuawells835Ай бұрын
2:58-It was just the Kingdom of Great Britain. The "United" part wouldn't be added for another century, when the Acts of Union of 1800 merged Great Britain and Ireland.
@RoyalRegimentofScotlandАй бұрын
It was on occasion referred by united kingdom of Great Britain
@zarabada6125Ай бұрын
If you read the 1707 Act of Union, you will see the new entity referred to as the "united Kingdom of Great Britain," (though some online copies capitalise the U). In the 1801 Acts, the new entity is the "United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland." There are many fascinating debates online about the capitalisation (or lack thereof) of the "u" in the 1707 Act and when the country actually became the "United Kingdom."
@RoadsguyАй бұрын
@@zarabada6125 So like in the US Declaration of Independence, "the united States of America" since our own name hadn't been finalized yet and it was more a description than a name.
@martychisnallАй бұрын
Incorrect, the acts of union themselves specifically refer to it as the “United Kingdom of Great Britain” numerous times.
@EricDillinghamАй бұрын
actually, dumbass, it wasn't even the kingdom of great britain even if you get semantical, just "Great Britain". go outside
@ambeatchАй бұрын
One of these days he’s gunna hit me with a “fun fact Yes” and I’ll be floored
@VulpesInculta-h2bАй бұрын
ah yes the floor here is made out of ambeatch
@bulukaki7063Ай бұрын
Exactly what i think lol
@abzzeusАй бұрын
The Kingdoms United, stopped trying to conquer each other and decide to see what they could conquer together - turns out they could conquer, a *LOT*
@towgod7985Ай бұрын
Well Said.
@relix7373Ай бұрын
Scotland and England bonded over their mutual love for stepping on the Irish
@Gypsygeekfreak17Ай бұрын
@@relix7373 to be fair the irish raided england scotland and wales and took people back as slaves and this was going on for 700 years
@aidanmurphy8436Ай бұрын
@@Gypsygeekfreak17800 years of occupation still outnumbers that by a century, besides i don’t think some medieval raids made for good justification of the potato famine, cultural suppression, and religious persecution the irish endured over countless generations
@Ocro555Ай бұрын
Why does this line go genuinely hard
@aidanfedorochko3728Ай бұрын
When it comes to why things happen is usually comes down to one idea: To Hell with France.
@unbekannteruser2418Ай бұрын
Good boy.
@ElguirideCalafell-sb1yzАй бұрын
that's just in the UK. That's how you ended up with brexit.
@roguishpaladinАй бұрын
I mean, that's true for England, but usually not so much with Scotland.
@carlospepitos153Ай бұрын
Same reason why Germany united
@Alan_MacАй бұрын
@@roguishpaladin Not really. Historically, the partnership between Scotland and England - which resulted in the AoU of 1707 - began in 1560 when Scotland requested help from England to oust a French garrison from Leith.
@RadioMartyT1BАй бұрын
WALES: "Am I a joke to you?" ENGLAND & SCOTLAND: "Well, yes actually."
@thebottles3153Ай бұрын
Well they were already part of England, so awesome, besides they were all equal in the UK except the Southern Irish.
@darkdragon7210Ай бұрын
Wasn't there another country on that island?
@thomasbravadoАй бұрын
England is Frylock, Scotland is Master Shake, Wales is Meatwad. Ireland is Carl and they like to swim in the pool in his backyard.
@kevinshort3943Ай бұрын
Wales is a Principality, both Scotland and England are Kingdoms.
@notintere5tedАй бұрын
@@kevinshort3943 Wales is a country, it has its own government and laws
@MatthewMopoАй бұрын
Being Welsh, it’s depressing to watch an entire video where my country is referred to as England. It’s even more depressing given how historically accurate this is.
@howtoappearincompletely9739Ай бұрын
Indeed. Diolch, Harri Tudur! :pouting_face:
@dwgray9000Ай бұрын
Because the english refuse to admit after they ran out vikings that really liked brie and yorkshire, they got conquered by the welsh.
@ToastieBRRRNАй бұрын
Well that's what violent annexation does to you. Instead of peaceful personal union. Which reminds me, is that why Wales is referred to as Principality? Or was it the title Prince used be a bit more prestigious than King? 🤔
@ToastieBRRRNАй бұрын
Ironically merged by Henry VIII, a Welsh King, if you get what I mean...😅
@RoyalRegimentofScotlandАй бұрын
@@ToastieBRRRNBecause prince of Wales was already a title. Wales wasn't actually a kingdom
@LuukvdHoogenАй бұрын
I like how they probably avoided any naming disputes by naming the new kingdom after the island.
@RoyalRegimentofScotlandАй бұрын
Well the monarch was already styled king/queen of great britain so it was a no brainer
@togerboy5396Ай бұрын
@@RoyalRegimentofScotland And the seven old Anglo-Saxon kingdoms (despite only controlling England’s territory) would grant the most powerful of the seven kings the title of “Bretwalda” meaning wielder, or ruler, of Britain, despite not controlling Scotland nor Wales.
@johnnyxrcfcАй бұрын
Not strictly true, the island at the time was known as ‘Albion’. The name ‘Britain’ comes from the Latin Britannia/ Greek ‘Britanios’ which were the lands south of hadrians wall i.e. modern day England and Wales.
@cynicat74Ай бұрын
@@johnnyxrcfc You're completely wrong. The island was known as "Prydain", which is where the Romans got the word "Britannia" from. Albion only consisted of England, Alba consisted of Scotland, and Cymru consisted of Wales.
@RoyalRegimentofScotlandАй бұрын
@@togerboy5396 Bretwalda wasn't actually a title. It was more of like a very generic term for strongest guy in britian. Its effectively just king of the Britons in old English
@ElladanKenetАй бұрын
Elizabeth: Aight, I don't feel like getting married or having kids Parliament: But those are literally your two jobs Elizabeth: Oh well!
@blackchryslerАй бұрын
Fun fact: in this video History matters made a mistake. Elizabeth never named any heirs because in her late reign she was vulnerable in her old age. James VI was chosen in secret by her advisors and she never found out.
@perceptoshmegington3371Ай бұрын
She was a total minger unfortunately
@edmerc92Ай бұрын
@@blackchrysler She didn't name anyone publicly (for fear of conspiracies against her) but certainly planned for James to be her successor, and he knew it, too.
@cattysplatАй бұрын
She was married to the job, basically kickstarting the creation of Great Britain and the beginning of empire by building a big navy.
@blackchryslerАй бұрын
@@edmerc92 Elizabeth executed the Earl of Essex 2 years before her death because he was conspiring to take the throne. So her administrators had to write letters to James VI in secret to prevent her from finding out as she would have executed them too. If you can give me proof that Elizabeth knew about James VI inheriting the throne in the future I would be very interested to learn something new.
@nosoupforyou8202Ай бұрын
1:05 "too busy having his head cut off to really give it a go" Did not expect this and giggled about it
@jamesbulldogmiller29 күн бұрын
I had to play that back to be sure what I heard
@crosshair4483Ай бұрын
Last time I was this early japan was ruled by a Shogunate
@Oran_FitzАй бұрын
How The Actual Fuck Are You One Hundred And Fifty Seven Years Old? Secondly, How The Actual Fuck Was KZbin A Thing In The Eighteen-Sixties?
@GGdudeАй бұрын
Thats what she said!
@Amaan_ZargarАй бұрын
They still let the emperor dress like an emperor
@adamk.7177Ай бұрын
@@Amaan_Zargar You can also dress like an emperor. It's not illegal. Nobody's stopping you. Do it.
@Sam-I-Am981Ай бұрын
Yup
@FastTquickАй бұрын
This video makes me think there should be a video on why Castile and Aragon merged together into Spain?
@Hudpix16Ай бұрын
They had been ruled by the same monarch since 1516 for some 200 years until the Bourbons got rid of their privileges.
@HalbaredАй бұрын
I did see a video recently on all the different parts of Spain and why they 'united.' Can't remember where, I watch so much here.
@no.6660Ай бұрын
You gotta love that the most unlikely alliance ended up becoming the most powerful nation on earth
@megazard5249Ай бұрын
I love even more that it's now not and just a laughing stock. 😂😂😂😂😂😂
@OneTrueScotsmanАй бұрын
@@megazard5249 Yes, one long past its sell-by date.
@wordytoed9887Ай бұрын
The video I have been waiting for.
@segiraldoviАй бұрын
One thing I will always regret was that he didn't make the Acts of Union video in the English history series. It could have been a nice ending considering that England would then cease to exist and become Great Britain.
@ryandanngetich2524Ай бұрын
@@segiraldovi England never ceased to exist, it just became part of a bigger thing
@TrofuskyАй бұрын
I thought James Bizonet just asked them to politely play nice
@jamesbissonette8002Ай бұрын
I like that spelling!
@anaverageyoutubeuserАй бұрын
@@jamesbissonette8002the legend himself.
@Artifis0743Ай бұрын
Who is James Bizonet
@LostToasterАй бұрын
How do you think the english managed to bribe all those people? Obviously James Bissonette funded it.
@brendenwright7957Ай бұрын
@@Artifis0743 a patron supporter of the channel, those who purchase a specific rank on the History Matters patreon get a special mention at the end of each video, James "Bizonet" being one of them. Also people make a bit of a meme of the different ways his last name can be spelled.
@nolananderson4782Ай бұрын
Over 300 years later, still no one has managed to settle the Darien
@rosieroti4063Ай бұрын
Aha!! Now we wait to see if we get gta 6 before the settlement of the Darwin gap.. but Fun Fact.. No... 😅
@SarthorSАй бұрын
The English have been utterly selfless in their dealings with the Scots. While the English are masters of complaining about things, we realise that it's part of the DNA of the Scottish. If they ever run out of things to complain about, they would literally die. And so the English, with no thought for themselves, turned themselves into villains to ensure the survival of the Scottish people. Even the Irish helped out by invading Scotland and setting many parts of it.
@praisethelordpig1212Ай бұрын
@@SarthorShugh Laurie blames his Scottish roots for his miserable nature lol
@johnnychopping3655Ай бұрын
Well the Darien gap currently has millions of people pouring through it and the Chinese have plans to build a highway through it as part of their belts and roads initiative... so I don't think it will stay that way for long
@Snaake42Ай бұрын
@@johnnychopping3655There have been plans for highways through there before. I'll believe it when they've actually built it. Sure it's hikeable in 1-2 weeks, but there's plenty of venomous critters and other nasty stuff on the way, both from plants, animals and just the terrain and weather. Not exactly a nice walk. And unlike when hiking in developed countries, nobody will or frankly even *can* bail you out if you get injured. Many people die on the trip, the exact numbers are unknown but it's pretty certain the official numbers from Panama are underreported.
@theboxingarmadillo1610Ай бұрын
You are just awesome. Thank you!
@adambashaxd420Ай бұрын
Its obviously Napoleon, of course its him.
@RevolutionaryGooseАй бұрын
Nah it was failing to colonise Panama and going broke
@balabanasiretiАй бұрын
Boring
@gegecryАй бұрын
Fun fact:No
@benjaminlynch9958Ай бұрын
Yep, Napoleon gets credit for uniting two separate countries unrelated to France and doing so nearly a full century before Napoleon’s rise to power. Make it make sense! 🫠
@SirBogginsАй бұрын
Him being short meant that the English & Scots wanted to one up him by making their nation taller than him!
@jasonbullock2816Ай бұрын
I'm glad we are together 😊🇬🇧
@bjiornbjiornАй бұрын
Wow! An accurate summary of the Darien affair. A surprise, to be sure, but a welcome one.
@zeppelinprime7892Ай бұрын
Watched your Communism in Russia 10 minute video in class recently.I had to explain to my teacher in leaving cert history who you were and the benefits of watching your content. Keep up the great work.
@thedemocraticfilipino6417Ай бұрын
I have waited for you to make this since the History of England Series, I am happy that its finally here
@jeremiahsafford1389Ай бұрын
0:43 What is that flag you used for England and Scotland united under James?
@Red_PlanetАй бұрын
They united because it’s part of England’s mission tree and England had admin tech 10 by it, not to mention Great Britain’s ideas are so much more better than England’s. Not to mention Scotland likes to go wild with colonization, it disrupts good borders when they make a new colonial nation in North America and the “Stop subject from colonizing” button doesn’t work.
@ItsGroundhogDayАй бұрын
Here I was expecting them to be done in the 1400s.
@segiraldoviАй бұрын
I will never understand why Paradox would never implement a system where: 1) My PU does not make colonies where one of my colonies already exists 2) I could tell them where to colonize (with Spain it would be excellent) 3) Peacefully join 2 colonies in the same region if I am the owner of the PU
@andreamarino6010Ай бұрын
@@segiraldovido i need to remind you that paradox locked behind a paywall the feauture to transfer occupied land during wars? (Till some months ago, so 11 years)
@nicolad8822Ай бұрын
Translation?
@segiraldoviАй бұрын
@@nicolad8822 Europa Universalis 4 stuff
@dannyarcher6370Ай бұрын
Rules for Conquest: 1. Never invade Russia in the Winter. 2. Don't settle the Darien Gap.
@joec9693Ай бұрын
And never get in against a Sicilian when death is on the line!!
@jonathanwebster7091Ай бұрын
3. If you're a Europe -conquering dictator, don't try and invade Britain.
@jorgebarriosmurАй бұрын
@@jonathanwebster7091 It worked for Wiliam the bast......sorry, the Conqueror.........
@jonathanwebster7091Ай бұрын
@@jorgebarriosmur yeah, but he wasn't a Europe -conquering dictator.
@seytanuakbar3022Ай бұрын
Napoleon and Hitler invaded Russia in SUMMER. Do you Westerners have ana history books?
@SethSilver24Ай бұрын
Babe wake up, HM uploaded
@Sly88FryeАй бұрын
It's been awhile since I've watched your channel but wow you have over a million subscribers. Nice! And it looks like a lot of back and forth between England and Scotland here. It looks like the unification has worked for them though from what I can tell
@Exotic3000Ай бұрын
Very nice!
@kennyearthling7965Ай бұрын
More complicated than I thought, and this is a short video!
@shadowsingularityАй бұрын
I just searched history matters and you upload a video at the same time lol
@warriorwisdomt8Ай бұрын
This was a nice topic to answer : A great topic for next video is : “ Why did Britain and France fight over Saint Lucia 🇱🇨 so much ?
@derrickthewhite1Ай бұрын
I don't think the fighting over it was significant, just that it seemed to change hands every time. The reason for this is was it was used a "Small change" in various treaties. If the other guy just needs little more than you're offering, throw in a carribean island to make up the difference and you don't have to completely rework everything. St. Lucia was small but profitable, and thus ideal for that sort of diplomatic duty.
@Jay-ql4gpАй бұрын
I enjoyed this! Thank you!
@muhammadhabibieamiro3639Ай бұрын
Another amazing video
@Minotaur-of-MaliceАй бұрын
Even though the answers to most of these videos are essentially “because it was easier”, “because money”, or “because they’re French”, It is still entertaining to watch the information dive leading up to the answer. Fun as always!
@pixelstheredАй бұрын
Correction: Your graphic shows the Isle of Man as being part of England, and latterly Great Britain. It has never been part of either and remains a separate Crown Dependency to this day.
@blackpearl8439Ай бұрын
Which brings the obvious question, why?
@pixelstheredАй бұрын
@@blackpearl8439 probably a potential future video. I can explain but I can't animate it Edit: Oh wait you were doing the bit. The line he uses in the videos. Whups.
@jibs8392Ай бұрын
This is something I noticed too. The IOM didn't even fall under the British crown until 1765 and even then (and now) it was/is only a personal possession of the monarch. A CROWN dependency, not even a British one at that. If the UK becomes a republic tomorrow, the IOM would surely still retain the Lord of Mann, until its own revolution to replace them with a president (Eaghtyrane Tinvaal?)
@astrocat84Ай бұрын
2:42 accurate graphics. the Union was formed far away from an angry mob in a shed that is today part of the University of Edinburgh.
@Conn458Ай бұрын
Short, to the point, no waffle. Good video
@lex1mark21Ай бұрын
You videos are the little treat I look for after a long week. Keep it up friend!
@TaigaCatOfficialАй бұрын
What is that flag at 0:43?
@seanjones2524Ай бұрын
House of Stewart/Stuart
@TaigaCatOfficialАй бұрын
@seanjones2524 Thanks!
@ColumbidaeKingАй бұрын
W video 🔥
@raymondricci5323Ай бұрын
I never heard of the Darien Scheme until this!
@cam4146Ай бұрын
Yay! I'm early! Love the vids!
@nunyabizneez1527Ай бұрын
Something to add, Darien is largely uninhabited to this day. The Scottish government chose perhaps the single most uninhabitable scrap of land outside of Antarctica to colonise, and invested 1/5 of their treasury into it. The US attempted to build a highway across it from the 1960s-1990s and gave up. There's 30,000km of road called the Pan-American Highway which stretches from Alaska to Argentina, and the 100km through Darien was estimated to cost 3x as much as the existing 30,000km. Darien is one of those few places on Earth that even with modern technology, it simply rejects human life. The approximately 8,000 people that live there eke out an existence in "oases" of temperate clime. The land is so rough, the air is so heavy, and the diseases so virulent that you can break your ankle and die of exposure just looking for somewhere to shit.
@gyo900Ай бұрын
Because James Bissonette was the one pulling the strings all along.
@NobleGamer889Ай бұрын
He was truly 2 steps ahead
@balabanasiretiАй бұрын
Boring
@jackroberts8382Ай бұрын
“It was Bisonette All Along!”
@allenkennedy99Ай бұрын
Can't believe James Bissonette was the Bay Harbor Butcher all along.
@Artifis0743Ай бұрын
Who is James Bisonette
@Lalita_LunaАй бұрын
I hope in the future we'll have a History Matters that would explain how the political intrigues of our current age will have formed the world of the future
@justinfenner869Ай бұрын
For a follow up to this, perhaps a vid on why did Ireland and Great Britain unite?
@FinnbobjimbobАй бұрын
Settler colonialism
@ValiantValiumАй бұрын
oh thats simple: Because Great Britain said so
@gumloproductionsАй бұрын
Subjugation, with the goal of supplanting the Catholic majority of Ireland in favour of Anglo-Irish Anglicans and Ulster Scots Presbyterians, ultimately for the goal of full access to the pastoral land, agriculture and lumber, and a pacified neighbour. Much of Ireland's woodland was exploited for industrial expansion in the North of England and in the Scottish Lowlands. A lot of land in Ireland was owned by England and Scottish landowners.
@edmerc92Ай бұрын
At the time, only Protestants had the right to vote.
@jackdubz4247Ай бұрын
@@gumloproductions The OG Great Replacement Theory. Only made reality.
@michaelowino228Ай бұрын
Good video.
@BlublodАй бұрын
The Scottish noble racing past with his hair on fire cracked me up 😂
@uglywornoutshoelace9654Ай бұрын
It’s important to mention that the Scot’s were basically given Jamaica too. Which at the time made more money than all the 13 colonies combined
@corvusglaive4804Ай бұрын
Hence why most of the current population there have Scottish surnames yet are mostly of African descent! 😂
@matthewgliatto7339Ай бұрын
@@corvusglaive4804Look up Donovan McNabb: Irish first name, Irish last name, ethnicity not so Irish
@seacloudsАй бұрын
@@corvusglaive4804 And the Scots, per capita, owned far more slaves than the English
@blackdiamond5977Ай бұрын
England: "And then, after hundreds of years of fighting me, all it took was some bribes. Funniest shit I've ever seen" Scotland: "Worst Mistake of my Life"
@randomguy-tg7okАй бұрын
To be fair, bribery is a lot easier if your enemy has blown 20% of their entire wealth on trying to colonise the single worst choice they realistically could have ever made.
@Lp-army1Ай бұрын
@@randomguy-tg7ok 8/10 on choice 1/10 on actually being able to supply said choice
@attiepollard7847Ай бұрын
The Scottish better be lucky that they are even in the Union. In a Scottish better be lucky that the English themselves want to keep Scotland identity. Because it seems that other Scottish want to import foreigners in to erase Scottish identity all in the name of international socialism. Damn shame
@RoyalRegimentofScotlandАй бұрын
Tbh this is a bit simplistic it was more complicated than that
@thedrinkinggamemaker9749Ай бұрын
I can't understand why we let someone else rule our land, Cap in hand 🏴
@vansglitches1192Ай бұрын
Nice
@blitzgaming9561Ай бұрын
Been waiting for this video for a while.
@nuagorАй бұрын
2:35 tl;dr - England bribed Scotland.
@jackdubz4247Ай бұрын
Coerced would be a better term. The Aliens Act of 1705 comes to mind.
@michaelball93Ай бұрын
Wow, 20 seconds and I'm in.
@harveya1a952Ай бұрын
Because uniting would allow them to establish the James Bisonette empire
@SvalbazАй бұрын
Glory to he❤
@1trackmind28Ай бұрын
Bisontium Empire
@baxelbox313Ай бұрын
You ever gonna make 10 min long videos? Just curious cuz you stoped doing them but they where very good
@that_jamesguyАй бұрын
These videos are glorious.
@aleksandarvil5718Ай бұрын
Island version of *France & Bretagne* !!!
@dazai_.992Ай бұрын
My 7th great grandfather came to America as a deserter Scottish soldier in 1746 after the Jacobite defeat at the Battle of Culloden, I'm actually interested in that.
@anuragtumane5227Ай бұрын
There was even a Scottish Independence referendum in 2014, but now they are united.
@OneTrueScotsmanАй бұрын
For now. But support for the union keeps creeping down, despite all attempts by the unionists and Westminster's attempts to change it. Now, consistently, only a minority of Scots support the union. We won't be silenced. The next time there's a referendum, we'll be gone.
@ahhlewisАй бұрын
@@OneTrueScotsman I wonder how Scotland will survive when its getting subsidised by England and the fact it cant even maintain a stable internal government
@Pizza23333Ай бұрын
@@OneTrueScotsmanah yes the support that has been “creeping down” for a decade, and saw the SNP routed at the last election while consistently coming ahead of the pro-independence support.
The sound effect at 1:23 made me laugh for a lot longer than I've laughed in a while.
@ScotWallaceАй бұрын
nice vid bro
@BallTheRascalАй бұрын
Cool
@charliespurr7325Ай бұрын
Because James Bisonette wanted to drive from the north coast to the south
@Quin_RamАй бұрын
Because of Caesar.
@markojojic6223Ай бұрын
Happy to have come from CGP Grey
@Jack_todayАй бұрын
If the topic is interesting could you do a video on why only a part Crimea tends to be part of large empires? (The ottomans, romans and mongols all only seemed to have a part of it at their heights, even though the mongols controlled the land on either side)?
@GarkKahnАй бұрын
Another idea Why and how both halfs of ireland got divided
@martinmorles1Ай бұрын
The English confiscated the lands of Irish Catholics and gave them to English Protestants in an attempt to establish a firm grip on Ireland. Which resulted in a pro British community establishing in the north who opposed independence
@joedh23Ай бұрын
Already done I think
@RoyalRegimentofScotlandАй бұрын
Pretty simple Scottish colonists
@NeutralinoАй бұрын
@@martinmorles1 Most of the Protestant ancestry in the North is Scottish, not English. Hence the existence of the Ulster Scots dialect.
@BlazeCloneАй бұрын
0:53 is one of the many reasons that some people in Scotland campaign for independence
@thevis5465Ай бұрын
It is just not some people, the majority of those born in scotland support independence and over 50% of all people in scotland do.
@BlazeCloneАй бұрын
@@thevis5465 campaign doesn't mean support, it means to actively push for it, not simply support
@SSMMTTEEАй бұрын
@@thevis5465No they don’t, hence the loss of the referendum in 2014, and the absolute smashing of the SNP at the general election this year.
@thevis5465Ай бұрын
@@SSMMTTEE they did not get "smashed" they were 4% off of labours vote share, the SNP is already ahead of all scottish polls again and SNP support is not independence support, they are different things. I know many SNP supporters who did not vote in the GE. Those born in Scotland voted to leave the union, 52% to 48%. Ipsos mori polling puts support for independence consistently above 52% today. You are clueless.
@SSMMTTEEАй бұрын
@@thevis5465 They lost almost all their seats. Cope harder if you like, and be as r@cist as you feel like, it won’t make your life any better.
@ColumbidaeKingАй бұрын
Always wondered lol
@mjudecАй бұрын
Favourite line was "and soon he was too busy having his head chopped off" Never change you beautiful channel
@nerdbomberАй бұрын
My favorite part of the videos is hearing his list of top Patreons! I wanna know if they’re really spinning three plates and if the podcast is really about words
@bryansmith2808Ай бұрын
The podcast is about books, not words
@feynstein1004Ай бұрын
Politics aside, you gotta admit the Union Jack looks a hell of a lot cooler than its individual constituents.
@damienreilly4347Ай бұрын
The union flag has to be one of the coolest flags there is.
@alistairmrkerr1336Ай бұрын
The Scottish flag is the second oldest in the world, the Welsh don't get represented on the Butchers Apron but do get to war under it
@RoachChaddjrАй бұрын
@@alistairmrkerr1336 Obvious anglophobe located
@melaniedrogr951Ай бұрын
nah whales has the best flag with its dragons
@alistairmrkerr1336Ай бұрын
@@RoachChaddjr is Wales represented on the Union Flag ? Do Welsh soldiers fight under the Union Flag ? Where did I mention England?
@teamskulltron25Ай бұрын
Finally one about my homeland 🏴
@darkphoenix2745Ай бұрын
Because James Bizonet wasn't there to prevent Scottland's bankrupcy.
@christianwestling2019Ай бұрын
It never ceases to amaze me how many different identities can take place on a rather small island with very few natural boundaries.
@historyViewer1Ай бұрын
The documentary dives into the political, economic, and social factors that pushed Scotland and England to come together. After years of conflict and rivalry, both nations faced challenges that made union seem like the best solution. For Scotland, economic troubles and the lure of trade benefits with England were major motivators. Meanwhile, England was looking to secure its northern borders and strengthen its position against potential threats, particularly from France. The documentary also highlights the role of influential figures and the public sentiment of the time, showing how a mix of ambition, necessity, and a desire for stability led to the historic Act of Union. Ultimately, it’s a story about two nations finding common ground despite their differences, setting the stage for the United Kingdom we know today. The engaging animation brings the historical events to life, making it an entertaining and informative watch.
@kecajkecajowski568Ай бұрын
Make a video on why polish-swedish union didint happend
@TrocaTheNeroАй бұрын
Long story short: John III of Sweden had married a Polish princess: Catherine Jagiellon and their son: Sigismund, was elected King of Poland and Grand Duke of Lithuania when Stephen Bathory died, becoming Sigismund III. He was then guaranteed to also become King of Sweden since Sweden had a hereditary monarchy. John III dies, Sigismund becomes King of Sweden as well and so we have a personal union. But Karl, John III's younger brother and Sigismund III's uncle, wasn't very happy about this because Poland-Lithuania (and Sigismund) was Catholic and Sweden was Lutheran. So, he started a rebellion leading to the deposition of Sigismund from the Swedish throne in 1599. Karl then became "riksföreståndare" (regent) of Sweden until 1604 when he was officially crowned king as Karl IX.
@Zadlo14Ай бұрын
@@TrocaTheNero Sweden wasn't entirely Lutheran back then. It became Lutheran due to attempts of Charles IX.
@010101110100Ай бұрын
After the collapse of polish-Swedish fusion cuisine it was decided humanity would be better off without
@icysaracen3054Ай бұрын
Can you do a video explaining why some Chechen clans are loyal to Putin Russia and some others are strictly independent, want to break away and supporting Ukraine. It sounds similar to Scot’s
@babibabibabibabibabiАй бұрын
sad that he probably sidnt see this. but ither than that i dont think he'll donit, since he says he doesnt want to do politics nowadays and more just old history
@Sermentian1867Ай бұрын
Can you please make a 10 minute history video on the 7 years war?
@SuchDarknessАй бұрын
he stopped doing 10 minute history because youtube's monetization systems changed, meaning he would lose money on longer videos
@XapheusАй бұрын
@@SuchDarkness Ah, with "The KZbin Algorithm" audience desires and quality are secondary. The main metric is "engagement". So shorter videos give more viewers, maximizing revenue for both KZbin and the channel itself. But, when looking back in history, the best videos would include the additional depth OOP and many of us are looking for.
@RR-in7doАй бұрын
England: Wanna hook up? Scotland: No England: Too bad
@THEORPHEUSIАй бұрын
Great work man! Btw what software do you use to animate your videos?
@matthewgillies7509Ай бұрын
I did a paper of this in 2007, and had to go back and read the minutes from the debates in both parliaments from these ponderous tomes that were copied and published in 1707. I can still smell those books today.
@WashingtonBallАй бұрын
Because Kelly moneymaker said so
@MineONiteАй бұрын
0:28 buns in the oven is absolutely absurd
@impalfaАй бұрын
What a convenient video to come out the day I start to research for a uni essay about the formation of the union, thank you Mr history matters
@justtheilluminativ282Ай бұрын
Good video idea: Why did Canada and Denmark contest Hans Island?
@Purewater1189Ай бұрын
"SCOTLAND FOREVER!!!"
@MRBaLiStiKАй бұрын
Englands better except Blackpool I fucking hate it there
@SmudgeThomasАй бұрын
Nothing like two enemies teaming up to make an awesome duo
@macsenplaysАй бұрын
0:16 So who is saying to who "Your mother" here? 🤔
@Joaza998Ай бұрын
Probably Scotland
@SydsourtroutАй бұрын
England says it to scotland. You can tell because he’s wearing red and the crown is that of Edward Longshanks
@Kheyr.Wada.Channel24 күн бұрын
Your mother obviously 😅
@KieranBarnbyAcousticАй бұрын
The kingdoms of England and Scotland didnt cease to exist. They are alive and well today - Great Britain is a Kingdom of Kingdoms, there is still plenty keeping both the English and Scots culturally and politically seperate up to, and including, the Scottish Parliament. If anything, modern UK politics show a complete win for Scottish rule over the British, given they were the first to have a parliament of their own (NI and Wales being assigned Assemblies for a long time, offering much more limited power over the given regions). But, more so, no English Member of Parliament is allowed to sit in the Scottish Parliament, but every Scottish Member of Parliament has an inate right to sit in both the Scottish Parliament and the House of Commons. With no seperate English Parliament, this has led to the Scots being able to vote in free university education for all Scottish citizens while simultaneously voting to raise the University tuition fees for the UK.
@swtdgmnАй бұрын
What sources were utilized in this video so I can further research this topic?
@bullmoosevelt4495Ай бұрын
The last time I was this early Scotland was still independent.
@ToastieBRRRNАй бұрын
Last time I was this early, the Scots was still in Ireland.
@hentehoo27Ай бұрын
I expected Scots to yell *"FREEDOM!!"* here.
@thedrinkinggamemaker9749Ай бұрын
Oh flower of Scotland When will we see your like again
@genericcommenter1267Ай бұрын
I'm guessing there's a lot of Americans in the comments who are suddenly experts on Scottish perspectives of unity. Braveheart and a scottish great great grandparent do not make you Scottish.
@cynicat74Ай бұрын
This. I see this kind of attitude from a lot of pseudo-Welsh as well lol We Brits may all talk smack about each other, but that's just how we are. Anyone with a lick of sense realises that independence is frankly pointless, and detrimental.
@RoyalRegimentofScotlandАй бұрын
Tell me about it
@ItsGroundhogDayАй бұрын
I have Scottish ancestry, but I have no interest in being European. We overthrew them for a reason.
@OldStag72Ай бұрын
@@cynicat74 Independence is not pointless it would get the nukes out of Argyll.
@nomad186Ай бұрын
@@ItsGroundhogDay what does high taxes have to do with anything remotely related to being European?
@riceadАй бұрын
Lovin the Mr.Ben tribute
@whopito422Ай бұрын
Don't know to be proud of myself or embarrassed that I actually knew all of this beforehand
@jerryappleton6855Ай бұрын
- Same language - Same Monarch - Same Island - All their noble houses had intermarried - All their merchants and rich had intertwined business interests Makes sense...
@okay2439Ай бұрын
Scotland has its own native language like welsh and irish
@jerryappleton6855Ай бұрын
@@okay2439 Scots: Is is dialect of Middle-English. The Anglo-Saxon kingdom of Northumbria actually went all the way to Edinburgh (which, as the name suggests, a Saxon settlement). This kingdom eventually conquered or united through marriage the regions of Cumbria and Galloway into it. These were Britonic Kingdoms speaking Briton (or Welsh). So even by the Norman conquest, southern and middle Scotland spoke Old English (which diverged slightly in the 13th century into Scots, Middle-Ebgkish remaining in English). But they are mutually compatible. It's like a Slovak and Czech speaking (but even closer).
@stickaroundАй бұрын
@@jerryappleton6855 He was probably referring to Scottish Gaelic.
@UdhdhfufufАй бұрын
@@okay2439the Scottish spoke English for centuries before the union ( for trade reasons)
@kennymoffatАй бұрын
@@jerryappleton6855 This is a bit of nonsense which is usually trotted out as pro union propaganda. Yes, the Lothians were part of an Anglian, not Anglo Saxon kingdom of Northumbria for a period, but before that it was populated by Brythonic Celts and it has been part of Scotland since for more than 1000 years. Edinburgh is not derived from English, its root is Eidyn and pre-dates the Kingdom of Northumbria. Edinburgh and the Lothians is riddled with Gaelic and Brythonic Celtic place names. Scots and English developed independently, and what you call middle English wasn't really English, it was a Germanic sounding language that both Scots and English came from and wouldn't be understood by any Scots or English speakers today. English and Scots were not mutually intelligible because it is recorded that translators were used in communications between the Scottish and English courts pre 1603.
@flippern3726Ай бұрын
Because James bissonette wanted to see Great Britain united