The miracle is that this case law was nicely explained in less than 5 minutes
@thomasribar94763 жыл бұрын
Yall filled in the gaps where quimbee has been slacking/lacking and for that you are heroes and I salute you
@mattmatt49163 жыл бұрын
Great Ruling from SCOTUS!!
@Hammer1978 Жыл бұрын
Jurisdiction cannot merely be implied it must be backed up with Facts and Evidence.
@adaml29322 жыл бұрын
So it basically affirmed the Long Arm Statute
@andresmall32533 жыл бұрын
SO IF MICHIGAN HAS JURISDICTION ON THE SAME EXACT IDENTICAL CASES, MONTANA CAN TAKE JURISDICTION OVER THE MATTERS??💭🤔
@USLawEssentials3 жыл бұрын
I don’t follow your question exactly. Would you rephrase it? Also, no all caps please.
@andresmall32533 жыл бұрын
@@USLawEssentials no problem. Q: If you have Jurisdiction over the matters. Can another state take Jurisdiction if it's the same exact identical matters??
@USLawEssentials3 жыл бұрын
Yes, it is possible for a court in more than one jurisdiction to be appropriate. However, it would not be appropriate for there to be identical proceedings in both courts bc it would be a waste of resources and there could be inconsistent results.
@andresmall32533 жыл бұрын
@@USLawEssentials Q: WHEN A JUDGE ORDERS VACATE JUDGMENT AND SENTENCES DOES THAT MEANS THE CASES IS OVER?? 💭
@adaml29322 жыл бұрын
@@andresmall3253 depends
@CliffordCummings-o2o Жыл бұрын
Frivolous Litigation over something that should have been decided in milliseconds with AI is what ic.