The Vikings did not disappear. I am still here. And I am of Viking descent!
@CartoonHistory2 жыл бұрын
Always get excited whenever I hear the chronicle music at the start
@LyleFrancisDelp2 жыл бұрын
They now play in Minnesota.
@christophereichten90052 жыл бұрын
Do you live in Minnesota Don?
@LyleFrancisDelp2 жыл бұрын
@@christophereichten9005 no
@christophereichten90052 жыл бұрын
@@LyleFrancisDelp Then keep it’s name out of your mouth.
@LyleFrancisDelp2 жыл бұрын
@@christophereichten9005 Um….wut? What’s wrong with me saying the Vikings now play in Minnesota?
@christophereichten90052 жыл бұрын
@@LyleFrancisDelp Yeah you’re right. But I’m sick of people speaking in Minnesota who don’t live here. I’m sure you’ll defend yourself in your next comment but I don’t care what it is. Just stop speaking about places you don’t live in. And try not to take this personally and have a conniption fit.
@DanishGSM2 жыл бұрын
We are still here.
@Ravenoflight22752 жыл бұрын
I love this documentary ,it was very good. 3 years ago I took a 23 and me DNA test and to my surprise I am most of my European dna comes from Sweden and Ireland. I am African American my mother‘a dad was biracial . My point is this. I am fascinated with English and French history. The Norman’s being descended from Viking definitely had the edge. I have always wondered were there any Anglo Saxon that survived after The Norman’s took over .
@blackerpanther33292 жыл бұрын
Just know those DNA tests are horseshit
@andyculf88872 жыл бұрын
Anglo Saxons survived and thrived, the Normans only replaced ruling class and never fully ruled England, they had to build castles as the English always rebelled, we speak English not Norman french and we are English not Norman, within 2 or 3 generations the small number of Norman's had already begun calling themselves English not Norman.
@Anne-pv9cb2 жыл бұрын
So you are from Africa and moved to the USA?
@dal89632 жыл бұрын
It's cool that you are interested in that side of who you are, as alot of history and world changing things happened because of who you came from and we don't study or read much about them in our history books.
@Rover200Power2 жыл бұрын
I have traced my ancestry back to Normandy and eventually Rollo, as well as King Ecgberht. I'm sure most English people these days have some links to the Normans who came over as well as the Anglo Saxons.
@BobCaseyAerial2 жыл бұрын
Great watch. Enjoyed it. Thank you
@cdfdesantis6992 жыл бұрын
It's fascinating that the British Isles, such small islands sitting just off the shores of western Europe, would be so violently fought over, & eventually, become one of the greatest empires the world has ever seen - the globe-spanning British Empire.
@Tidde Жыл бұрын
Happy you didn't dub this. Glad to hear the Swedish professor speak my native language without an annoying dub over it.
@janetiscute772 жыл бұрын
I have 62% Scandinavian Viking DNA...I had ZERO idea. Nobody in the family knew, either. Crazy. This includes Icelandic, Rus, Norse, Swedish and Danish.
@jb25322 жыл бұрын
They are just hidden in plain sight
@josesiliezar17582 жыл бұрын
They didn't disappear They simply realized there's more money to be made by moving to Wall Street and becoming stockbrokers...
@bryanjackson89172 жыл бұрын
Now known as "corporate raiders".
@darrelmorgan62662 жыл бұрын
I agree with the gentleman who said that if Godwinson's forces hadn't already been force marched and fought the Norwegians that the battle of Hastings would have likely turned out differently. As it stands, William's forces really only won by a mistake of Harold's men in breaking formation. Up to that point William was struggling as though trying to knock down a brick wall and his assaults up to the feigned retrteat were of little effect. In the end however, a loss is a loss whatever the reasons. I actually don't think the Norman cavalry was all that great at this early point. At least nowhere near as good as later on in their history.
@neilmowles95816 ай бұрын
Godwinson had a lot of his army go back home to their farms after being conscripted for so long and picked up new soldiers on the way to York. Who knows how his army would have looked otherwise. He was well liked and followed so would have picked up a substantial army somehow. As far as I see it Godwinson's forces were a one trick pony. Amazingly good at it and effective but one trick only. I feel in this regard william didn't fancy himself a win with an all out close combat infantry melee. Godwinson also had the hill in his favour and defended it well but as soon as he didn't have his close combat melee or stopped just defending his hill he lost. His army composition wasn't as diverse and he lost because of it. The battle lasted days and it was close to going either way. Norman cavalry was only a thing because of the assimilation of french culture and warfare. I feel william only utilised light cavalry at this time. Medieval Heavy armoured shock cavalry came into its own in later years and wouldn't have been so feeble at smashing godwinson's sit on the hill defending tactic as what william actually utilised wasn't used in this way and stopped at the sight of the shield wall. The normans took their brilliant soldiers and warfare and has stamped its mark all over the world.
@darrelmorgan62666 ай бұрын
@@neilmowles9581 Thanks for the excellent comment/reply. Weren't the Normans later on actually renowned(and feared) for their Calvary charges? I thought I remember reading that many of their battles were nearly won after the initial heavy Calvary onslaught like a train slamming into and running over their opponents.
@neilmowles95816 ай бұрын
@@darrelmorgan6266 Yeah they became great. With the invention of stirrups, high backed saddles and use of couched lances and their destrier warhorse means they were more agile and devastating in the charge. As good as they were tho I believe some accounts that were written border on myth to scare the next foe.
@beverlybalius93032 жыл бұрын
They became Englishmen, Scotts, Irishmen and then Americans,,,,
@danichicago91402 жыл бұрын
Italians / Sicilian too
@opinionatedaf15632 жыл бұрын
Americans = we're all Vikings.
@dalj43622 жыл бұрын
Americans? The only credible archaeology found is l'anse aux meadows. There's no real.eveidence of any settlements apart from the above.
@morseventurechannel13652 жыл бұрын
I'm here fam 🤗
@Mike-iv3hy2 жыл бұрын
The Vikings did not disappear , they are alive and well , living in Iceland . DML
@vladivanov5500 Жыл бұрын
Perhaps The Battle of Hastings would be a more appropriate title.
@НатальяТаещё-ы1е2 жыл бұрын
Викинги оказали влияние на историю Европы и России.
@tonyabrown40562 жыл бұрын
I think Russians are descendants of Viking
@annamosier19502 жыл бұрын
yes
@peggybrem28482 жыл бұрын
I really like this narrator…👍
@travhammer2 жыл бұрын
"Cauncious Reason." (Has created a strange animal of Man!
@peacefulwife51992 жыл бұрын
They are still here...the VIKINGS...they are in our hearts and minds....forevermore. Shield Maiden living in 2022
@Rye_Toast2 жыл бұрын
Sure, Jan.
@peacefulwife51992 жыл бұрын
@@Rye_Toast ?
@pumbar2 жыл бұрын
One sentence summary of video; 'William the bastard, putting the king in Viking'.
@peterlewis99282 жыл бұрын
There is mention of the Normans learning to use cavalry from "Carib Indians" at about 25 minutes. How did the Normans know about "Carib Indians" ? Please explain.
@annamosier19502 жыл бұрын
what about Charles martelle
@opensourceguy730 Жыл бұрын
Yes, whatever happened to former Viking, Randy Moss?
@ajknaup35302 жыл бұрын
If Harold Hardada & his Norse hadn't invaded the Danelaw in 1066, William might now be known to history as "The Bastard", having thought better of his invasion
@0leandr12 жыл бұрын
Hadn't William know about Hardrada invasion he wouldn't planned his one.
@Perspectiveon Жыл бұрын
Basically it's a pseudo-discussion. ALL were descendents from Northern Pagans. The only reason 1066 is referred to as the end of the Viking era is William introducing Fench influence and historic events are written to suit the narrative of current rulers.
@kristynmarchus5422 жыл бұрын
Why, since you are in the business of educating us on history, was the tapestry you showed of the Battle of Hastings a modern knock-off…when you have access to the actual tapestry, called the Bayeux Tapestry. The original is vastly different than the milk toast one you showed. The Bayeux tapestry is one of the most unique needlework recordings of actual history…with a needle working technique not seen before and forever after copied. The tapestry is immense and probably worked on by an entire village of needleworkers for many years to complete. Maybe you felt it was not noteworthy, however I feel You have done a disservice to the mission on which you are educating us.
@Tj-ho2fs2 жыл бұрын
I think you mean “milquetoast” 🙄
@Rover200Power2 жыл бұрын
The original is contained in a giant glass cabinet. The museum probably didn't want to expose the original to the elements and bright lights just so a camera crew could film some panning shots of it.
@kristynmarchus5422 жыл бұрын
@@Rover200Power Your point is well taken however there are other documentaries on KZbin and elsewhere that have footage that is in the public domain that could have been used. Nonetheless, it would have been helpful/and far more accurate if the documentarians of this otherwise very informational video, had indicated that this was a likeness of the original tapestry. Even a reproduction of some of the segments of it which i have even done, would have been preferable. Some may wonder what the fuss is about, but if you saw the stitching on the original it would be self explanatory. Thank you all for your comments. K
@Rye_Toast2 жыл бұрын
It was really awkward watching the Bayeux embroidery scene as someone who does embroidery, the modern 6 strand cotton floss in various states of being a knotted mess, the machine-made tapestry reproduction, and the actors mimicking the act of embroidering by making continual loops on the length of floss and just tugging it repeatedly. I guess they were worried that a few stitches would ruin their prop. I mean, we see a lot of documentaries that reenact people embroidering, this one just really stuck out as... odd.
@peggybrem28482 жыл бұрын
Tostig was most certainly a traitor who went north to find an army. He involves Harald Sigurdsson by reminding him of old family ties. This ruined the Vikings in England .
@angrypidgeon17145 ай бұрын
7:55 actor rule #1 don't look at the camera =]
@Petquest_gaming2 жыл бұрын
I use headphones and can’t watch this because I don’t understand what there saying so whatever
@peacefulwife51992 жыл бұрын
Use the closed caption feature.
@JGB33LaRochelle3 ай бұрын
Skøll
@davidgriffith71662 жыл бұрын
This was more about the Normans than the Vikings. It was poorly written and repetitive, and not in a chronicle format, but kept going back and forth. Boring.
Agreed but when I dug for more information on it the rus were kievan rus and slavic people who eventually fought off mongolian control in the now russian area saving slavic people from mongolian mistreatment and slavery, started a new place of power in moscow and then became russian.
@AngusCon34182 жыл бұрын
So William had the tactical advantage because his men were on horseback..hmmm.. what can this mean? Ah! It's Kurgan Steppe propaganda! OK, so i solved the riddle , now what do I win ??