Why Doesn’t Everyone Use This Animation???

[@NyanCoder]

1:41 deltaTime is not the "amount of time that we want it to take", it's more like the "amount of time that elapsed since last frame"

[@valourus]

He is really not the math guy lol

[@syth-1]

Funnily later in the video he uses the correct explanation, But ye I was screaming when I heard that .-.

[@NubeBuster]

My ears started bleeding

[@Hwyadylaw]

@@valourus Though it's more of a physics or animation thing than maths

[@Sozzah]

he corrected it at 13:07

[@theDanielJLewis]

And here I thought the conclusion of this whole thing would be like, "And you can get this perfect animation with this one line of CSS."

[@radadadadee]

It blows my mind how deep the ignorance for these "everything is JS" frontend devs go!

[@user-em7rl8wc7j]

@@radadadadee THANK YOU FFS I CANT EVEN FIND A PURE CSS VISUAL WEB BUILDER SO I HAD TO CREATE MY OWN BC EVERYONE IS GOING JS EVEN IF USELESS

[@vectorlua8081]

"Oh no Math! My worst fear as a JavaScript Dev!" rofl.

[@vectorlua8081]

@@monad_tcp kek

[@Mauri6870]

Accurate, given his hiccup with understanding how floating point arithmetic works in his previous video

[@Seedwreck]

This is a Dependant-only developer issue fs

[@monad_tcp]

4:54 "The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is (whichever is greater), it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. " (the rest isn't required for this case)

[@DLAXTOX]

👁👄👁🗿 you make my brain hurt

[@givrally]

This sort of "exponential smoothing" is, in essence, an animated and slightly modified solution of an ODE that's found all throughout nature, called exponential decay : dx/dt = k(T-x), with k being a "speed" factor and T being the target. It shows up every time that 1. some quantity is approaching a target, 2. the further away it is, the faster it goes (proportionally to that distance), and 3. the quantity has no "memory", meaning that at some value it will go the same rate, doesn't matter whether it just started, or started at twice that value and reached it going down. For example, heat dissipation : A kettle filled with boiling water will lose ten degrees much quicker than that same kettle filled with barely warm water, and once the former reaches the temperature that the latter was at, it will cool in exactly the same way. Thus, Newton's law of cooling states that the temperature T of a cooling body follows dT/dt = k(T_ambient - T). Another example is radiation : If you have twice the amount of uranium atoms, you'll expect about twice of them to decay each minute. And, if you discard the decayed material, there's no difference between 1kg of fresh uranium and 2 initial kgs of uranium at its half-life : The former has 1kg of uranium, and the latter has lost about half of its original amount, and is now 1kg of uranium too. They'll both decay at about the same rate. Because decay is actually probabilistic, I'm simplifying a bit using the law of large numbers, so it won't work if you have only ten atoms of uranium, but radioactivity does indeed follow the ODE of exponential decay, with a target at 0. dM/dt = -kM One last example for the Data Scientists : A nice and simple gradient descent on the L2 norm actually obeys the law of exponential decay too ! The derivative is proportional to the distance, and k is your learning rate. Of course, in this case it's slightly modified, because we're solving it numerically : The initial solution near 11:00 corresponds perfectly, the new position being the old position plus the derivative (= (target - position) \* speed) times dt, but if the speed is too large compared to dt, it becomes jittery, as the approximation "overshoots" the true value. But if you look at the (1-e^(-speed \* dt)) term, if speed times dt is small enough, then we can use the e^x = 1+x Taylor approximation to find that, 1-e^(-speed \* dt) = 1-(1-speed \* dt) = speed \* dt ! The difference is that, once it reaches 1, instead of overshooting, it's brought down to almost exactly the target. We could probably rewrite the equation as a well defined differential equation, but because of the exponential it would likely involve nonstandard functions and stuff, so I'd rather not. EDIT : Well, crap, that's exactly what the blog post talks about only a minute after I've unpaused the video.

[@JamEngulfer]

High school math jump scare

[@NateVolker]

Differential equations are legitimately undergrad college math - like calc 3 in some curriculums

[@communismwizard8198]

@@NateVolkerdepends on the country and stuff. In year 12 Australian high school, differential equations are in Advanced maths, simple integrals are in maths extension 1, and more complex integration is in maths extension 2, like using integration by parts and stuff

[@monad_tcp]

@@NateVolker diff eq are kind of easy to understand intuitively, specially if you are not doing a test and can use the wikipedia to consult the table of rules for differentiation because you forgot most of them.

[@SandraWantsCoke]

I am a JavaScript dev. I dropped out in 6th grade.

[@JamEngulfer]

@@NateVolker Wild, we did them in the last two years before college.

[@scrimb]

Web devs discover fundamental principles of animation: part 1

[@radadadadee]

Next step: they should start learning CSS and animate it there.

[@sanjaycse9608]

😂

[@plusonerabbit]

the construct game engine's blog has an article on basically the exact same concept titled "using lerp with delta-time", but it ends up with a different formula that i find much more intuitive :) lerping by 1 - (1 - f) ^ dt, where f is the amount of progress you want to have made over the course of 1 second can also multiply dt to change the scale of things, e.g. dt * 60 would make it so f would be how much progress is made every 1 frame at 60 FPS, except it's framerate-independent

[@ChronoCZ]

Oh wow. This is useful

[@Malix_Labs]

The next step is making it all CSS

[@krellin]

it should have been the first step

[@Shulkerkiste]

@@krellin The blog post explains the math behind it and CSS is also doing just math in the background.

[@spicynoodle7419]

@@Shulkerkiste yes but CSS is processed on the GPU and in parallel, it doesn't block rendering of the UI like JS does

[@saiv46]

Kid named cubic-bezier():

[@monad_tcp]

@@krellin NO, it shouldn't, if it was the first step you wouldn't learn anything about how it actually works

[@TVDaJa]

I could enjoy these videos more if you would not pretend to not have pre-read the articles

[@redviper7766]

then the video would be 40 minutes

[@aaskrad]

I was expecting some new css easing function, but ended up getting memories of war from uni.

[@Spongman]

for your audio engineer take: this is simply a low-pass filter on the step function (implemented in this case as a first-order "infinite impulse response" filter).

[@jst1977]

Btw it is exponential moving average again (same thing as in the load balancer video). In the lerp(position, target, min(1, speed * dt)) position is the smoothed value, target is the noisy value and the last part is the factor.

[@winniedobrokot]

This math becomes much easier if you focus your thoughts not on the absolute position, but on the distance to the target. It become something like “shrink twice distance to target each second”, split to multiplicative steps by multiplication e^(-s*delta_time). When the exponents are multiplied, their powers add up, making the animation frame rate independent.

[@TheFerdi265]

There is another game that solved the float precision thing in an interesting way: StarMade (back when it was first released at least) divides the world into chunks that each have their own origin, and along the borders the game does a smooth transition between the two coordinate systems. That is of course much less elegant than the outer wilds solution, but is also a neat trick :)

[@Delfigamer1]

The sqrt-interpolation can be made stateless too, in a similar manner to the exponential function. The update should look like: function sqrtEaseIn(dt, currentX, targetX, sqrtAccel) { const deltaX = currentX - targetX; const q = Math.sqrt(Math.abs(deltaX)) - sqrtAccel * dt; if (q

[@RiversJ]

Everything contained is essentially required fundamentals for any game devs and then some, most have entire collections of hyper optimized easing / zoom / jump / delay / mass and meet type animations and an entire vocabulary exists to describe them and mixing them together is an art form of it's own. One of the things i do miss from when i was a tech art!

[@m4rt_]

1:40 dt or Δt, also known as delta time, is the time between two timestamps. (delta is a greek letter, and it's usually used in math to mean a difference/distance between two things) Usually this is done in game development, and it's the time between two frames. So you can move more or less depending on how long the last frame took to render, etc.

[@SteinGauslaaStrindhaug]

8:30 Yet, Apple think it's perfectly acceptable to not move the input focus to the obviously next active window when changing spaces until the animation (or the fade if you disable seasick-mode) is completed! I'm so sick of typing half a shell command in the editor on the previous space when changing to the space with my terminal. Who has the patience to sit and wait a whole second for the input focus to move to the terminal before start typing!? Ironically, ignoring input while animating; rather than letting me type half a git command in an editor and then have copilot hallucinate some insanity based on my misplaced shell commands; would be somewhat better than the current behaviour. But of course the real and simple solution would simply be to move the ducking input focus _before_ starting the animation! It would not affect patient users who patiently sit and admire the ridiculously slow and motion sickness inducing full screen slide animation, at all but it would make my life much better. I cannot think of any reason that the input focus should remain for about a second (maybe it's less, but it feels like ages to my ADHD) on the previous screen. Are there really anyone who regularly decides to change to a different screen with the intention of finish writing a couple of words in the previously active window while the animation finishes?!

[@mikkelsvartveit]

This is why I don't use spaces. Also how do you switch it to fade?

[@SteinGauslaaStrindhaug]

​@@mikkelsvartveit Yeah… I'm trying to get used to using a built in shell in the IDE rather than switching spaces, but I do prefer to have everything maximised to minimise distraction so it's not ideal. And also since alt-tab behaviour (even with 3rd party Alt-tab apps) in MacOS is also terrible, having two maximised windows on the same space is far from ideal. You chan change the animation from movement to fade by checking "Reduce motion" in the system settings. It's under Accessibility > Display. But this disables almost _all_ animations (at least all full screen animations) systemwide. And it also changes the "prefers-reduced-motion" value from "no-preference" to "reduce" in CSS media queries in all browsers, so it will disable a lot of animations on websites too. Which is fine by me, since I genuinely find large animations nauseating and also most small animations are just annoying. So it improves web browsing a lot, but absurdly in MacOS itself it just replaces the animations with fades with the same transition speed as the animation. And this makes the spaces-lagging-input-focus problem worse because I can see the next window quite early in the fade but I have to watch the terminal cursor to see when the focus actually has moved. Which with my ADHD feels like fricking ages!

[@Lampe2020]

20:02 Well, that's exactly why the camera movement in Minecraft gets jittery after a while and why the stripe lands appear. It's just the numbers getting so unprecise that the imprecision gets noticeable.

[@DKSubconscious]

Everybody was using that in the flash days, in fact I was doing it just today while prototyping a Hero transition animation using Adobe Animate, first time I've been near that program in about 12 years but the shortcuts came back pretty quickly.

[@ThymeCypher]

My entire issue with the whole article is the adding to position. Switches are fixed width, fixed state. You can set position to an interpolator function based on position. The approach given is using position as a state which is excessive.

[@steamer2k319]

The switch is just the simplest introductory example. The point of the article, taken as a whole, is to show a smoothing function that generalizes to all sorts of scenarios such as multi-dimensional, infinitely-scrolling map cameras and beyond.

[@seanthesheep]

Exponential motion is used pretty much everywhere on Scratch, since it's pretty easy to do change x by (((dest) - (x position)) / (10)) in a loop to get any variable to smoothly glide. It's nice because it continues to be smooth even when the animation is interrupted, like if the user moves their mouse around or spam clicks a button

[@aqua-bery]

Deltatime is not the amount of time you want the animation to take. It is the time pffset between frames. It makes it so your animation is unaffected by the amount of frames your computer can pump out

[@ColinTimmins]

This was a really cool video. Thanks! =]

[@harveyrice8504]

"delta over delta time" 🤣🤣

[@Cachivacheh]

great video. I would love to see more videos like this.

[@nobodyofconsequence6522]

15:00 YOU ARE A PROGRAMMER, MAKE A SMALL SCRIPT TO TRANSLATE YOUR VARIABLES BACK FROM THEIR SHORTHAND WHEN YOU'RE DONE! something like this maybe #!python #took me 3 minutes. could probably optimize better, but the point is to save time above all else def expand(in_str): return in_str.replace('x','position').replace('a','target').replace('c','speed') print(expand("d/dt x = (a-x) c")) # d/dt position = (target-position) speed I don't know what sort of math markup is being used, but surely there's some way to define shorthand, or regex replace or something like that and then run your mathml through it. And if there isn't there should be

[@givrally]

Counterpoint : The idea isn't just to have to write less, it's to make the equations more readable. You want your variables to have good readable names in python, sure, but that's absolutely not the case in math, where it would go against the readability of how these variables come together. If you really need to indicate a word with your variable, it's a subscript. You can also see it in modules like scikit-learn, who use variable names like X, y, c, gamma, h, alpha... and if you know a bit about ML, you don't need those variables to be named input, output, param1, param2, step_size, learning_rate... not only because they usually follow a pretty standard nomenclature, you don't call your output/label variable G for example, but also because it allows coders and maintainers to understand the equations in the code. I'd rather have `np.linalg.solve(X.T @ X, X.T @ y)` or `np.linalg.pinv(X.T @ X) @ X.T @ y` ... ...than `np.linalg.solve(augmented_input.T @ augmented_input, augmented_input.T @ labels)` That said, a better choice would have been T for the target and k for the speed, instead of a and c. This keeps with the standard nomenclature for differential equations and you can more easily see what's happening.

[@nobodyofconsequence6522]

@@givrally As an outsider to the field, I found the equations harder to follow and I think whole words would have made it easier. So it depends who you're trying to educate. Beginners and outsiders (like me) benefit from everything spelled out, wheras veterans (apperantly such as yourself) will prefer shorthand and lose patience if you do so.

[@givrally]

@@nobodyofconsequence6522 Yeah no I'm not saying those equations were very readable either, I had trouble reading them too, but that's not due to using letters instead of spelling them out, that's due to using the wrong letters that don't mean anything special, not formatting them properly (what the hell does that exp - c • t mean ?? At least use parentheses you barbarian), and not explaining the reasoning very well (why did we quietly solve the ODE between two lines without even mentioning it ?). I guarantee you that if it was written as "d/dt (position - target) = d/dt (position) = (target - position) \* speed = - (position - target) \* speed" you wouldn't understand any better.

[@Lampe2020]

On my own website I try to avoid animating manually using JS, I try to do it as either a single JS Element.animate() call or even as a CSS animation directly if I can predefine it, as for example on the toggle switches in the settings menu. There I use a simple cubic bezier animation that's defined in CSS to run whenever the state changes.

[@mqix3741]

amazing format! i like it.

[@mab932]

From a controls perspective it's a simple proportional controller designed for a variable sample rate.

[@doc8527]

While the content of the article might be "naïve", it actually contains good amount of math and comparison behind the little smooth animation thing we used in a lot of places. Very well explanation for many. You will be surprised tons of devs (includes game devs) who used it daily but never try to know the logics behind. They used it because it feels smoother comparing to other linear/cubic approaches. Even a lot of good animations later are fairly based on this type of thing and keep iterating upon it. I was kinda upset as a "semi-senior" dev (ppl called me senior but I don't feel like it), instead of trying to understand/appreciate the math/concept behind, and take the switch as the simple example how a math function can effectively affect our perception, the comment section has fair amount of "we don't need animation" "who cares" "a whole blog about animating a button". I mean even we know that it doesn't mean we need to use it, but know some math isn't a bad thing right? The web community has a lot of geniuses, they made the entry bar so low that everyone can quickly pick it up and build something, but also now we have huge amount of "pragmatic" coders that don't appreciate simple thing and don't realize we stand on the shoulder of giant.

[@ZantierTasa]

This is cool. I've used the "simple" version when programming games, because it's an easy way to get smoothing. But I didn't realize it could easily be made to work correctly when dt is varying.

[@danielgilleland8611]

I love how TLDR is added in about two-thirds of the way through.

[@shaggygoat]

“1−e^(−ct)”, the value of the lerp parameter u = 0..1, describes the charging or discharging of a capacitor (through a resistor) to some new voltage where 1/c is the “time constant”, the number of time units that will pass before about 63% of the ever-slowing progress is made towards a new state. You sometimes see a time constant being the thing to set for smoothing function of a variable speed drive for controlling an electric motor.

[@dunkyl]

I know it's the simplest courtesy, but I appreciate that you bother always putting the links. It feels more and more common that people won't bother, even if they mention it in the video 😿

[@MasterHigure]

I have used this (although the naive, only-valid-for-small-dt version) plenty of times. I don't quite like how slow it is at the end, though. Some times that's fine, but some times it's not, and you can really notice that extra fraction of a second things take to align. The immediate solution would be to increase speed, but then it goes too fast when things are far away. I dunno. Right tool for the right job, I suppose.

[@siliconhawk]

i have recently been using hyprland WM for my laptop. and man those bezier curve animation for window's are sooo smooth man. every time i go back to windows i realized how jank windows is especially in terms of looking and feeling good

[@juliohintze595]

I love the attention to details.

[@chrizzzly_hh]

Why does the blogpost look so much better in this video? Arc Boost?

[@kizigamer6895]

Ya what the whole UI of the blogpost is different from the video how ????

[@screamingfungus_]

Read mode maybe?

[@unbekannter_Nutzer]

@1:00 In which way does an animated button, which can only be in one of two states, improve the understanding of the user? If it would have an effect at all, it would be a confusing or misleading one, since the state seems to be in an intermediate state meanwhile. The truth is, that the designer likes to implement some gimmick, and takes the first and simplest justification, which comes to his mind.

[@ruanpingshan]

I tried them all in the source article, and honestly I liked the cubic easing the most.

[@TheBypasser]

Oh yeah, the good old virtual RC-lowpass. Pretty neat at times (as it closely mimics lights, pseudo-analog meters etc), pretty boring for motion, as the speed is changed immediately on condition change. When I wanted auto-aim in my game, I wanted not just the stuff to fly where a target is, but also your actual guns to follow the new aim, and that change of speed looked unnatural for something massive. Morale: the actual physical simulation (just constant acceleration, e.g. +a, -a or 0) with a per-frame condition resolution (e.g. are we still picking up the speed, or it is time to brake in order to stop at the desired point) is the key! It is not that complex to implement (although is not trivial either TBH), yet has a defined end condition, has a smooth square ramp-up and ramp-down, has a PERFECT reverse response (in your case the slider would move slightly past the point where you've tried to reverse it, smoothly stop and accelerate back to the initial edge) - and actually gives your animated object the feel of mass.

[@RobFisherUK]

3 t squared minus 2 t cubed ... "this math is insane!" Yeah, ok ;) Thanks for pointing this out, though: I now know what to do next time I need to animate anything. I've always noticed things moving nicely in certain UIs and games, this must be how they do it. Please continue to do more like this in the future. It has applications everywhere. Diversions like 22:05 are also educational. 20:44 This must be normal for any open world game. Elite Dangerous has to model entire real life scale solar systems down to pebbles on the planet's surface.

[@SmoMo_]

I used to code with this technique a lot, but then I questioned why I was avoiding storing that little bit of state value, it wasn’t because I didn’t have the memory, or the cpu cycles to spare, I was being kind of lazy really. My preferred way to animate was to conserve momentum, just like objects do in reality. You can use a Tweening library, or put something together yourself After that, I found it was actually even less code and hassle to write than these stateless Lerp techniques, plus I could use meaningful quantities like duration ( measured in seconds) or maximum velocity ( m /s), and not arbitrary scaling values like ‘speed’ ( without any tangible unit)

[@infinitivez]

Can't tell you enough, how often and how powerful your channel has been in exposing me to new and exciting techs! (at least to me) I don't know how you find all this stuff, but I want access to your sources! Are you pulling mostly from some techy website, or are people just posting interesting things in the discord? My brain yearns for a 24/7 feed of this sort of thing. Google (and other search engines) have been unfortunately letting me down, more and more.

[@Khari99]

This was so sick. The final boss is writing this in Tailwind lol

[@karlgustav9960]

Well you could also use sine or cosine or tangent. (You got to cut theinterval that you want for example pi *0.5 to pi *1.5, I mean the part between the top and the bottom part of the function. Also adding exponents can make the animation more „springy“

[@denischen8196]

The toggle buttons are very short so it doesn't show the subtle differences very well. Try moving something a longer distance or along curved paths to show the difference. How does exponential smoothing compare to Bezier spline curves?

[@kipchickensout]

I thought you can just do allat with css transitions

[@lilyzheng2322]

This is like a simple smooth gliding code in Scratch😂

[@ArtisticScratch]

Until now I didn't understand why floating point errors happen

[@ErazerPT]

Gonna get some heat for this, but who cares... 1: You're adding totally unnecessary complexity. Now you need to keep track of things to know what state its on. If you have things that are dependent on it, you slowly build up a nightmare. 2: The concept of a TOGGLE comes from mechanical switches where something springy... guess... JUMPS. It's not unnatural, it's how it IS. You're supposed to throw it, not hold on to it. 3: This whole thing about toggle's nicely described a... SLIDER. Which has a very very slight ease out for slider potentiometers but NOT for slider switches. And in that case, you want to track the user not some time. 4: It's AWFUL UX to make a user wait on an expected instant action just because someone think it's a cool thing. p.s. lengthy unnecessary slow mo annoys viewers to no end. "cool animated UI" annoys users that just want to get ish done fast to no end. Which i guess it's why it ends up as mental masturbation material for people that don't actually have to use the ish they make...

[@ukyoize]

Designers run wild

[@brunopanizzi]

Also, a pretty animation will not fix a shitty product

[@CosmicFlux]

The author seems to be more active in the game dev world where this type of animation is super useful and solves problems that a cubic animation just can't. I agree that a toggle switch should feel snappy. But, a toggle is a simple way to show difference in animation equations. The author went on to show the exponential equation being used for camera movement which is a more practical usage. So, I don't hold it against them for using a toggle switch initially. This just feel like a weird hill to die on.

[@portblock]

If they dont add complexity then they can self congratulate and they measurebate

[@Disorrder]

Nope. Animation gives users more intuitive feedback from action. And as a result it looks and feels much better. You don’t need to wait animation and since it’s just a view, the real state was toggled instant. And as you can see in the video you can interrupt the animation, but you never clicking thousands times per sec on the button in real life 🤷‍♂️ (Allegedly)

[@avi12]

13:01 Another typo: "out" instead of "our"

[@timofey7773]

The function guy uses for interpolating called linear interpolation or just lerp It interpolates between start and end by value t When t is 0, then it returns start When t is 1, then it returns end Anything else is inbetween So, to smoothly move camera or stuff, you just put something like x = lerp(x, target, 0.2) 0.2 here is interpolation between x and target Each time we run it x is getting close to target And heres the function of lerp return start * (1 - t) + end * t;

[@klazzera]

I don't know what you dev's are taught but delta T(not "dt", it's something else but similiar) is basically the difference between two times of significance. Can be the difference between the desired finish time and beginning time, the time has passed since beginning, can be the time difference between two events, whatever. So you all are right.

[@ShaharHarshuv]

I audibly gasped when I saw the title "differential equations (oh no)

[@AlexandruVoda]

I have been an early adopter of the iPhone (got it as soon as it was possible) and have lived with smartphone interfaces for at least 15 years and yet I still find these toggles harder to understand than good old checkboxes. Unless there is also some color these toggles to me feel confusing. Maybe it is also because I grew up in a country where light switches are not consistently mounted the same way (even if the electric code always said they should) so there is no consistent association for me between left-right, up-down and on-off. Is it just a me problem?

[@Terigena]

It is not just you. I also often find them confusing. I also notice that they are often used in applications where confusing what state means ON and which means OFF may be intentional, such as whether to allow certain cookies.

[@stevenbasher5363]

Generally, circle on left is off and circle on right is on - I think this corresponds to typical English/Latin based left-to-right reading direction, so for RTL language readers it may seem strange or unintuitive. Most physical electronic consumer devices follow these conventions, such as with power switches, though I'm not sure if that's an unwritten rule / convention or actually standardized by any governing body. Light switches are inconsistent even in the US, but generally off is down and on is up (unless 3+ way lightswitches, in which case it could be either). I've heard lightswitches are inverted in other parts of the world, so vertical switches are not commonly seen in UI designs. "Up" is generally associated with "on" and "down" with "off", also presumably due to cultural / language biases - you will often hear of services being "up" or "down for maintenance", for example. Best practices usually indicate greyed out background for "off" state and some color for "on" state (green or blue are common) -- it's also generally advisable to avoid "green is on" and "red is off" due to Red/green color-blindness, despite this being a common association with "on / ok" and "off / incorrect". It is generally bad design to have a design be centered purely around position, unless you at minimum have labels corresponding to what the direction means. For example, the thumb or a label on the side could have an icon with an '×' for off and '✓' when switched to on, or text inside the switch corresponding to it's current state (on / off)

[@dareknyckowiak5906]

You should read up on Robert Penner's easing functions

[@LadyTink]

I love lerp, when I first learned about it, it helped me so much :)

[@1rez378]

I've been using it ever since I started game dev many years ago since it seemed like a no-brainer solution

[@noahpilarski]

18:40 ah this is why this video was in my recommended lol any mention of outer wilds and KZbin decides to show it to me.

[@rayanuki]

Thank you for reminding me why I still use gsap

[@ToroidalFoxCasual]

Outer Wilds mentioned 🎉 It's progression is you gaining information so you should play it as blind as possible.

[@vaap]

YESSSSS S S S SS S S S S SS omg i exploded when he said outer wilds

[@gerooq]

@@vaap me too bruh, love the outer wilds fandom uniting

[@tailez606]

Is there any reason why people have decided that radial switches should go fast first and ease out, and that it's the best looking solution? Most real life switches I've used have bi-stable mechanisms, where they are slow first (due to resistance) and then snap to the other stable point. Does that not look good in UI? Does it somehow feel bad to use from a UX standpoint, since a user gets slightly delayed visual feedback after clicking the button? It just seems like it genuinely would look much cooler if the radial switches behaved like real switches. They could even overshoot a little and snap back to the position to give it a little extra oomph.

[@Ryan-in3ot]

im partial to the sigmoid (σ = 1 / (1 + e ^ (-αx)) function to get that 3b1b manim look. I set alpha to 8 or 10 usually, and it looks pretty good!

[@plantparty]

I wonder if the 2X speed issue is related to this: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nyquist_frequency

[@sharkinahat]

My $0.02 hot take: If you're doing any kind of skeuomorphism based UI, you probably should make that switch/toggle (near) instantaneous - that's how switches work in the real word. It also saves you from edge cases where the user click again while the animation is running.

[@Sammysapphira]

The animation runs over literally 10 frames there's no chance of that

[@FrancoVS2112]

Hard disagree - the movement should be made easy to track because of the possibility of user error. The extra time allows users to zero in on the changing element and revert undesired actions. Real world don't need this - they already have tactile feedback, making it very clear which one was pressed when the user fat fingers them. And the one that don't (capacitive ones) suck.

[@jimmypatatoeyt4800]

pov: over engineering a button slider

[@andrewk2756]

The blogpost hangs tab when navigating to a certain section on Firefox, is it only me?

[@FrederikSchumacher]

Take a few seconds: thing that works. Take a few minutes: thing that works and animates. Take a few weeks, study some math, take a few more weeks and write animation interpolation framework, take a few more weeks debug edge cases, and you have a thing that works and animates and "feels nice". I know which of these I pick, and I know the world calls me lazy, and I call the world crazy.

[@carminator12]

From to Outer Wilds, what a journey. Very interesting.

[@卛]

The minecraft farlands also exhibit the behavior described in 20:00

[@nameless_fairy]

You really need calculate all this floating point stuff for simple animation? I wonder why websites are so slow...

[@magnusm4]

Saw this in Jonas Tyroller's video: Dear Game Developers, Stop Messing This Up! Where he wrote it as this: float blend = 1 - Mathf.Pow(0.5f, deltaTime*lerpSpeed); position = Vector3.Lerp( position , target, blend ); or float blend = Mathf.Pow( 0.5f , deltaTime * lerpSpeed ); position = Vector3.Lerp( target, position, blend );

[@lawrencejob]

It’s a rite of passage for all compsci students to think they invented a PID

[@vsolyomi]

So Outer Wilds runs on Futurama warp drive... How am I not surprised?

[@trelligan42]

He talks about the simpler code, but I wonder how expensive LERP and EXP are in compute time? Should we write our own version of these complex functions that do less granularity while being perceptually identical? #FeedTheAlgorithm

[@bomdiajj]

as a gamedev this is so f-ing funny

[@Ноунеймбезгалочки-м7ч]

3:00 can't you optimise this to (3-2*t)*t*t

[@ifscho]

Film in 60fps then already. 😁

[@MrMassaraksh]

IMHO. Looks great, works perfect on website with 1 tab and only browser opened though. As soon as it gets to the real world, when user opens 100500 tabs, a lot of stuff going on, browser stops rendering animations normally. Better not to spend time on them at all

[@RT-.]

That's not what happens in the real world though... On mobile at least, even if somebody has 200 tabs open, they won't all be *running*, the non-used ones will be paused.

[@MrMassaraksh]

@@RT-. of course they won’t be running all together. They’ll be working in “sleep” mode. js still executing on BG, something is fetching when resources are available

[@RT-.]

@@MrMassaraksh Maybe if you have a service worker... But yeah I disagree with the statement that most people will have their browser so slowed down that they won't be able to see animations properly

[@osku388]

the real world you say.. 😂

[@magne6049]

Now make a video about using this exponential animation with Tamagui..!

[@ksaw3212]

damn, dude just discovered lerps. I think that's how every dev reacts when they discover lerps. lerps are cool

[@conradrobinson7941]

It's not linear. Were you listening at all?

[@ksaw3212]

@@conradrobinson7941 but he's using lerps. most of the time I've used lerps was for this kind of stuff. I know what lerp means, but here he's using the linear interpolation for exponential stuff

[@proosee]

Uhm, are there really people who think that 1-exp(-x*dt) looks weird? That's like most common thing in science when it comes to describing processes...

[@cherubin7th]

You need to know about science to be familiar. Many don't.

[@flohh]

Are web devs just now discovering interpolation methods?

[@Kreypossukr]

Outerwilds mentioned 🗣️🔥🔥

[@orisphera]

I have an unfinished game where I find it hard to make the player movement smooth. Should I make the scrolling when the player reaches the edge smooth?

[@MajkaSrajka]

Quadratic formula. "Jesus Christ this math is insane" 🤣🤣

[@Carlos-cm3ul]

Idk abt you but I always use quadratic

[@999fini]

hey theo! how come you record your videos at 30fps? is it a mac limitation?

[@t3dotgg]

I, uh, am beyond confused by this question lol. I don't record at 60fps because it would be roughly twice the file size. I record on a PC, I capture card my Mac's display over, so that's entirely irrelevant lol.

[@kipchickensout]

lerp is its own word

[@portblock]

I started to like your videos as I was exposed to some new things, but they dragged on and now I realized, well, change the name to iReddit. I need summation not a word by word audio book

[@ARandomUserOfThisWorld]

I’m just casually watching this in cs class, we where just learning about this and I just get a little cheatsheet from Theo just on time 😭

[@soyitiel]

the bots are early

[@wakinki]

Is this a reupload, because I swear I already saw the video

[@puddlejumper3259]

Does this guy do anything other than read other people's blogs? It's the literate version of reaction videos.

[@quidoquidenzis5374]

16:08 got me haha

[@kittycatcrunchie]

Love how the "most watched" sections are just people skipping the maths lmaooo

[@meowsqueak]

I can’t believe I’m actually watching someone read out a blog written by someone else… I need a hobby.