Why Is The Omega Seamaster 165.024 'Big Triangle' So Expensive? | Wristwatch Check

[@knudsen1971]

For purists: SN is more like JAN67, baton hands may be ok, as there was small batch with baton hands made on the first week of 1967. Bezel seems as later 67-68 version, here I would expect the serif flat 1 bezel. Bracelet later replacement for sure too. My favorite model, I have 4 of those, but only one BT.

[@robynsjp]

Nice, I have a Q1 1964 (1963 model) fully complete in exceptional condition, with original bracelet, and with rare "Swiss Made" dial and irreplacable "mark 1" bezel. You won't find many of those if at all, and it is no longer one can wear much because it is absolutely unique. It sits at the bank like a bottle of 1960s Romanee Conti. But I did also find a repaired water-damaged one with replaced movement, bezel and crown, and found a fabulous black handmade beaver tail strap at a strap "atelier" in Geneva. Ideal for casual weekends and it does look good. Ironically, the dial is also a rare 1963 "Swiss Made" one (just before the standard "T Swiss Made T" ones), although damaged by the moisture.

[@kevinwall2313]

The patina on the indices is cool

[@matthewwhitney1693]

Gorgeous watch, and great video .

[@huntingtoncompany]

Glad you enjoyed it!

[@tenshihisaki6233]

A stunning watch

[@XEZGOLDZ]

Incredible piece 😮‍💨👌😮‍💨👌

[@huntingtoncompany]

Right, the dial is so good!

[@fatioubella4811]

A masterpiece 👍