Why It's Almost Impossible to Solve a Rubik's Cube in Under 3 Seconds | WIRED

[@JPerm]

Great video :) one of my favorite series on YT and you definitely did speedcubing justice here!

[@wrth]

Who would have guessed that J Perm would be here?

[@onnibools]

You are here too wtf

[@MacGuzman]

@J Perm i agree J Perm, i think he should have interviewed you too, lol. This is definately a well tthought out video and he did plenty research. What do you think the fastest time could be within the next few years?

[@JPerm]

i dont think an official sub-3 will happen in the next few years. and i wouldn't bet on someone beating 3.47 this year but in a few years i think maybe a 3.2

[@robalden2404]

J Perm are you uploading today? It’s your upload schedule

[@nathanway8974]

This is what I like with wired. They actually have a proper look into how cubing works, and doesn't just look at the first result on Google like mainstream media. Great vid ☺️

[@PeLOmaRgni]

...Wired is a mainstream media

[@fakeemail4005]

@@PeLOmaRgni yeah but it's good media compared to other media companies

[@user-sf4fy8bq1h]

Wired _is_ mainstream. Stop using “mainstream media” as an insult lmfao. You just look like you don't know what you're talking about

[@user-sf4fy8bq1h]

@@fakeemail4005 “good” media? what does that even _mean_ ? How are you measuring “good”?

[@fakeemail4005]

@@user-sf4fy8bq1h They don't try to shove a political agenda down my throat when I watch their videos. Or at least they don't make their agenda blatantly clear

[@amm9387]

This reporter is really good. All his works are so well built and constructed. Congratulations mate

[@SpydersByte]

"we'll build"? You'll build what?

[@STFwrinkle]

@@SpydersByte hahaha

[@SpydersByte]

you edited it but you only fixed half of the error, it should be "well built" :D

[@Ezio470]

Ikr.... He even went as far as dedicating a lot of his time actually learning it.... I was wondering in the beginning if he really tried to get into it or just wanted to present something...but boy i was wrong. Hats off.

[@tittycommitteesenator1878]

Just like his computer

[@FemboyHasu]

This guy literally learned the cube for this video, and not only learned, but he actually got better at it. That is dedication, he is a champ.

[@philjung]

Although it is nice to get paid to practice cubing for 2 weeks...

[@jeromealday614]

It's not that hard tbh, learned it by reading the included instructions. Took 10 minutes. Then managed to get a consistent 3 min average time

[@FemboyHasu]

@@jeromealday614 yeah 3 minutes are easy, but faster your times become harder it is to improve, and when you're cubing a sub 40s you basically improve by 1 sec a week and when u cube at 20 seconds it takes months

[@michaelboyle7281]

@@FemboyHasu I feel like the "beginners method" can only reach a certain amount of time. I realzed that him just learning the cube and getting under a minute in a few weeks probably means that method just takes a long time to complete, cause my best time was around 30 seconds (and I had a lucky scramble) but my average stays around 45, so while a good starting method its very slow. I think I misread what the convo was about, so sorry if that comments wasnt exactly on subject haha

[@garramiro]

​@@jeromealday614 it took you 10 minutoes to memmorize the last steps and learn the first two rows? I call BS

[@esram.3505]

No one starts with the idea of breaking a world record. You just start making progress little by little and until you realize it you have actually become fast.

[@maxhaibara8828]

Usually company makes something "competitive" to earn more money too. But still the human nature of trying to be their best is still the reason why these world records exist. And these companies are just supporting us, while gaining profits. Win-win solution.

[@esram.3505]

@jclouds22 OK sorry. You know what I meant

[@gabano1311]

Me in a nutshell.

[@hughmungus99]

Agreed

[@Eric-zz5ij]

@jclouds22 bruh, are you stupid or what?

[@nicholaslear7002]

“Talked to some local cubers” The local cuber: *cofounder of the world cubing association*

[@lombridious]

Yeah xD

[@arjumandsalfi274]

Hahahaha

[@theRevVA32]

"To be fairrrrr", he said that about the girl that was a speed cuber, not the guy who co-founded the organization.

[@Johnhasa1]

💀

[@TheBluePhoenix008]

Yoooo locals are packing

[@PokeBlock247]

It's always so refreshing to see a non-cuber make a good, informed video about the cubing community. Great video.

[@Slamolo]

Weren't we all non-cubers like him? And he became a cuber in the end, like we all did. It could be more broadly taught to children everywhere, it's a wonderful puzzle.

[@AryanKumar-in3pk]

@@Slamolo Yes, children should be taught to solve Rubik cube. It's not that difficult. I learnt it in about 3 days. Just had to remember few algorithms to solve it.

[@dennisp8520]

@@AryanKumar-in3pk can I ask why you think it's necessary to learn how to solve this cube. It's just a toy, what practical use is there to learning how to solve it?

[@kuldimanas]

@@dennisp8520 well, first of all it's the memorization skills that you need to learn the algorithms. Second, thinking your moves ahead improves the flexibility of your brain cells I guess. Also it's not always predetermined path. Sometimes you need to get creative and make your own moves. And last, it's so much fun, it really is.

[@dotdankory]

gooooooogleeeeeeee

[@andrewcamagay6255]

3 years later and now official sub 3 solves are becoming more and more likely, it's insane how far the hardware and the hobby has come in such a short time.

[@king_fitz9931]

Max park just got 3.13 it'd gonna happen soon

[@HomeRunChess]

Max Park got a 2.98

[@andrewcamagay6255]

@@HomeRunChess not in comp, and his fastest is currently 2.68

[@HomeRunChess]

@@andrewcamagay6255 Max Park is incredible

[@HomeRunChess]

@@andrewcamagay6255 even tho it wasnt in competition it’s still pretty impressive

[@mileschun143]

**human solves Rubik's cube in less than 4 seconds** Humanity: cool, do it faster.

[@cdurkinz]

We will probably continue to say that until a human can match a machine... I mean come on, we built the machine.

[@ChepFrosty]

Lol

[@krt7640]

True

[@thepicklechamp]

Miles Chun other half of humanity: are you sure you’re not a robot

[@gamerboi8092]

*solved in 1 second* Can we do it less than 1 second?

[@pakesanders5272]

“Why it’s almost impossible to use the bathroom between school bells”

[@mr.knightthedetective7435]

"The time it takes to get to it added with going through the crowd (outside and inside of the bathroom), finding the available toilet and finishing it in time makes it seem impossible to do"

[@marcussterling6065]

im alowed to do that for 10 minutes

[@L_T34]

Marcus Sterling lucky

[@marcussterling6065]

@@L_T34 ya

[@funnibird]

legend says, one man has done it before...

[@AndrewTyberg]

This is one of the very few GOOD cubing videos for non-cubers.

[@disastreee]

Andrew Tyberg but it still talks about how it is impossible

[@bennettstouder9849]

It’s OKish

[@chipp5148]

yeah dude im a cuber

[@disastreee]

SpaceCuber 1 I agree

[@notaweeb7936]

Im a cuber, meh 3x3 main is a stickerless yuxin little magic

[@jwo1382]

I used this video to learn to solve the 3X3. It took roughly 2 months. I can now solve in 40-50 seconds. The strange thing is that I no longer remember the algorithms, as it has turned into muscle memory. Great video!

[@parmesancheese5475]

i’d say my best time is a bit less than 2 minutes but i definitely agree with not even remembering the algorithms 😂 indeed it has turned into muscle memory!

[@autumn8215]

​@@parmesancheese5475my best time is 1min 20 sec

[@bvcghh1684]

For anyone watching I would recommend jperms video and you can learn to solve it every time in less than an hour

[@salad3955]

*5 second KZbin ad exists* This guy: alright I'm gonna solve a rubik's cube real quick

[@tazbid8489]

Lmao

[@levitheentity4000]

hey ricardou, how u doin buddy?

[@rujon288]

I can’t even solve it in under 20 seconds. 😢

[@wyldcat9396]

@@rujon288 I can't even solve it in under 40 seconds

[@seanaboyy]

James Kerman I cant even solve it

[@-MankoMan]

"No matter how good you are, there is always an Asian better than you."

[@subswithtwovideos-wb5ir]

Darn it! That suck because I am an Asian

[@imjustok9966]

No I am better at being American.

[@NobleLaika]

*cries in American*

[@bratitu5601]

@@imjustok9966 nah, the asian-american probably still better than you at being american.

[@zeuxlaught2797]

@@bratitu5601 oh yeah

[@corban4133]

1:25 dang that guy counted all the grains of sand Now that’s commitment

[@card425]

@Useless Channel of course there is how is that even new to u

[@blueferal8626]

I dont think he counted each grain of sand dumbass

[@Montanerrr]

BlueFeral R/woooosh

[@lambporks]

BlueFeral no no no~ he didddd~~

[@Mecal21]

@@card425 IT'S A JOKE

[@BenTheCuber]

Max Park, Ruihang Xu, Leo Borromeo, Tymon Kolashinski: Hold my cube

[@Velocityyyyyyyy]

First reply

[@samuelmay7716]

yiheng wang solving it in under 2 seconds 💀

[@tcs0808gd]

yiheng wang: what about my 1.05s solve

[@iiAchilles]

"alright time to go to sleep" *Why It's Almost Impossible to Solve a Rubik's Cube in Under 3 Seconds* "nvm"

[@yadom5232]

iiAchilles lmao literally me rn. 6 am no sleep

[@NickRoman]

Why It's Almost Impossible to go to Sleep at My Planned Time

[@corbina9849]

wth

[@scipio42]

Same

[@nafetsaces7079]

Like literally 🤣

[@azore7202]

“They’re called *Speedcubers*” this man saying it like I’m a different species

[@crilleroglau1276]

We are*

[@T0MYAMS0UP]

*Who says we arent*

[@hao_cuii]

Oh so that’s why everybody looks at me weird

[@Jay-og4yb]

Ultra nerds

[@havok-zpeedx83]

@@Jay-og4yb not at all

[@ankithmahesh1182]

Speedsolving tutorials in 2019: "you gotta learn and practice algorithms" Speedsolving tutorials in 2030: "the secret is to hit the timer really fast"

[@D4wGr1]

😂😂😂😂😂😂

[@felixthefox100]

I'm pretty sure in 2030 you can just activate the timer by looking at it. Or a high speed 8K camera can scan you starting and ending

[@webingerfamily9105]

@@felixthefox100 You could but they dont

[@adityarajsrivastava6580]

Haaha

[@ankithmahesh1182]

@@felixthefox100 That would be cool

[@trafmuc]

2:36, I appreciate hobbies and sports like this that can become so humble of a community. Pay attention to the lad next to him, he paused just to witness it go down

[@sayan64]

Wired: why is it impossible to solve Rubik's cube in under 3 seconds? Me: still working on my Rubik's cube since 1990.

[@xxEzraBxxx]

Learn how to solve it, keep practicing and your times will be lowered.

[@seanisnoob2885]

@@xxEzraBxxx True!

[@televizion9962]

@@xxEzraBxxx bruh he was joking

[@kodem199]

Tudor Vintila He is joking tho

[@irvingarcia7387]

Typical non cuber

[@ashwinsanthosh9154]

1. Buy a Rubik's cube. 2. It's already solved. 3. ????? 4. Profit!

[@parthibhayat]

*Cubing stonks*

[@maaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaan]

160th like

[@parinitachakma765]

1. Install pubg 2. Win chicken dinner 3.???? 4. Profit????

[@Ethanzz29e3]

Chicken sim reference:)

[@reyansh417]

@@parthibhayat lol

[@Cubeorithms]

Thank you for making this! It's awesome to see the speedsolving community getting some mainstream attention!

[@ChepFrosty]

Big owo

[@kingoftheseas9332]

It would be my dream to collaborate with you

[@lucaarmstrong6375]

This was the first video that got me into cubing. I now average sub 17 seconds with CFOP, and owe my thanks to WIRED

[@DanielG-yrusobad]

Same🙂

[@ethangeyer5170]

Same :)

[@VikForReal]

I'm approaching sub 15 average 😮

[@pll__skip]

Wired: It’s Impossible to solve a cube in less than 3 second Luke Garrett, Ruihang Xu, Max Park, *F a h m i* , Leo, Tymon, Yiheng, Feliks, Asher, Jode: Hold My Cubes Edit: i know they say ALMOST Edit 2: this is very possible now

[@jadenwhite3419]

max park never got 2 seconds?

[@pll__skip]

@@jadenwhite3419 he got it 3 times i think, but he got it off tape

[@pll__skip]

@@jadenwhite3419 and he post it on his instagram

[@jadenwhite3419]

@@pll__skip do you have a link?

[@beybladefusion3883]

Read the title it says almost impossible

[@SomeoneCommenting]

"1 minute 41 seconds... I'm ashamed..." Me: *an entire life without still being able to solve it*

[@bea6219]

I once used an online cube solver and it STILL took 3 attempts

[@danielwisdom8045]

My best time is 1minute 2 seconds

[@danielwisdom8045]

@Diego Marra 🙂😣

[@SubscriberswithoutAnyvid-sr3jx]

Diego Marra 😭😭😭😭😭😭 and my best is 41 second.By the way when I first solved the cube,it took almost 4 minutes.What about you?

[@sunnykhatri9449]

My maximum time is 2 minute 48 seconds 😔

[@Bruh-tz6gf]

Zemdegs: Solves a Rubik’s cube in less than 5 seconds. Asian guy: 😏

[@iwansays]

"Hold my rice"

[@lightr2187]

He still holds record for average

[@whyamihere8313]

It is actually Max Park

[@konstantinkodzhabashev1694]

Eric Shi hold my chopsticks

[@lightr2187]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/g4KnpmCKYrqtoac check this out

[@RemAtmos]

Such a good video. You guys really gave such respect and appreciation to such an intelligent and niche artform and its community (:

[@Peridox69420]

How to solve a Rubik’s cube. 1. Buy a Rubik’s cube. 2. It’s already solved.

[@Trix35k]

Yes than bring a scrambled cube and than replace it with it the solved one when no ones looking

[@Helmster]

You should become a comedian

[@Peridox69420]

Helmster No. I have crippling social anxiety.

[@notjettson8407]

100th like

[@laurensiller9222]

Yep,I still have mine in it's case for display but I'm currently working on my little sisters cube because I'm too scared I'll mess up mine 😂

[@Byhrgfdtustueueidig]

I've competed in a few speed cubing competitions when I was younger and the most impressive solver I have ever seen was this elderly Indian gentlemen at Berkeley. He only did the 2x2 event and his times were not very good, it took him about 2 mins per solve but what amazed me was that he solved it without any algorithms. He looked at the cube and worked out in his head what moves would take him to the solved position. Smart man.

[@jobfernandez9274]

Ye that's the 2x2 for you, with some cubing experience you can solve it without knowing any algos

[@CS-et4fs]

Is this sarcasm

[@sylent1]

@@CS-et4fs I dont think so , its possible to solve the 2x2 without any algorithms.

[@CS-et4fs]

@@sylent1 ik but 2x is hella easy, so why is he making a big deal out of this

[@theofficialkc9970]

@@CS-et4fs Well, you try solving it with absolutely no use of algorithms and no random turning

[@griffinmartin3812]

I’m waiting for the “My friend solved it in 2.5 seconds but didn’t film it”

[@birliptasenapati7469]

Realy?

[@Powpowsquad123]

He lives in Russia and goes to a different school

[@caterpaw5107]

Spoiler: that was 1×1 cube

[@wickedmajestic8100]

I’ve done it

[@evolvedbread1370]

@@caterpaw5107 na fam thats impossible it takes 8 minutes for speedcubers to solve it

[@madonnahagedorn5649]

Is there anyone out there like me who is having a hard time learning this skill. My son gets it. He understands the algorithms very well. I call him the puzzle man. He wrote everything down for me and I'm still confused. I get to a certain point and then I'm lost. I admire those who have mastered this puzzle. It inspires me to keep trying.

[@Destin._.]

I would suggest looking at J perms tutorial he explains it very well. I had a Rubik’s cube sitting on my shelf for years then I watched the tutorial and I was able to solve it

[@epsilonsolves1457]

Don’t worry you can get it! It takes some time. And I agree with the above comment about watching j perms vids, they’ve helped me a lot

[@empathogen75]

I actually learned it a month ago so I could teach my 6yo how to solve it. I’m down to like 90 second solves now.

[@thecjwolfpack]

It tends to be a bit harder to learn if you start older, but it's completely possible. Jperm's tutorial is probably the best way to learn. It's what I used after trying a bunch of different "how to solve" videos.

[@dagatti1200]

Try with a tutorial online! Maybe J perm one

[@dreflox]

People see me as a god when i solve a 3x3x3 at school in around 1min... then i see people solving it in 10 seconds...

[@simar1846]

Yeah , I know right 😂

[@Weigazod]

Then you see people solve a 3 dimensional 10x10x10 cube :)

[@ERhymesD]

"People see me as a god" yeah...

[@accidentalgenius7933]

then the 10 seconds people see other people solving it in 3.47 seconds.

[@obamaisntreal6149]

When is Carson streaming

[@mald7019]

I feel bad for the next generation of speedcubers. The records are going to be nearly unbeatable with the progress of today.

[@kingsoonkit9234]

Hope their interest holds long

[@montanasnack7483]

Yes oof

[@charliek115]

That's why we need new WCA events!

[@Den-qz3rm]

Mallory Dupuis time to move on to the 4x4 as the standard.

[@charliek115]

@@Den-qz3rm 4x4 records are getting pretty crazy too though

[@freedomkarungi1022]

the other kid on the table at 3:22 started questioning his life choices lmao

[@alainmg2362]

Hahahaha he probably though: '"is it really worth it to solve this" xd

[@Amir.........]

I laughed so loud at this that my mother and brother started to talk about my mental health 😂.

[@yf-n7710]

The record shown at 1:04 is even funnier when you have context. The record was dropped to 4.73 seconds here. The previous record had been 4.74, and that record had been set by the other guy at the table. He was very good-natured about it; the community that speedcubing has built up is pretty non-toxic.

[@hadrielnuarin8922]

@@yf-n7710 bruh mats was probably like wth thjs guy just beat my wr by 0.01, man mats was like im not beating that

[@yf-n7710]

@@hadrielnuarin8922 Yeah. At least it wasn't just some random guy; I think Feliks Zemdegs and Mats Valk are actually friends (which is why they were sitting together in the first place).

[@kloodledoodle]

wired : uploads a rubiks cube video max park : and i took that personally

[@RiceSquad]

How to make a WIRED title "why it's almost impossible to (insert world record) in under (world record time minus 1 second)"

[@absqrb]

Ooh ooh or plus 1 depending on the game

[@francisdimaano2350]

@@absqrb nah

[@sarthakgoel7697]

@@francisdimaano2350 yes it can be In case Why is it impossible to skip 89 stones in water

[@francisdimaano2350]

@@sarthakgoel7697 that's also a nah

[@riplikatlnloki5091]

The Asian guy beat it in 3.47 seconds so it like 0.50 seconds

[@JP-td8gt]

"No matter how good you are, there is always a computer better than you." Computer: solved under a second.

[@naziyadarve4535]

Still we are the one who gave them existence

[@petelee2477]

Code bullets video showed how fast a regular computer could.

[@ciarangale4738]

computers are extremely stupid. they can only do exactly what you tell them to do. they are simply stupid FAST

[@hewad378]

@@ciarangale4738 Not really....they don't have consciousness. And we do, eventhough we have no idea what it actually is and why we have it. Yeah...We're are crazy stupid.

[@ahmadkendakji6417]

Me:error 404 :( 10%,40%,70%,100% system will restart. System destroyed.

[@dpage446]

Who uses algorithms?I memorised the 20-move solve for every single one of the 43 quintillion possible combinations.

[@zachschumann5899]

TheDragonKing same

[@folo2007]

Yeah same, but that actually means we learned 43 quintillions algorithms...

[@ezdor8877]

@@folo2007 was gonna say that

[@electricyeet1527]

bruh

[@nesto9889]

????

[@MuffinMcFluffin]

This was awesome. I never thought I'd watch a 15-minute video on this (even though I've finally cracked how to solve one), but the presentation was phenomenal and this time just flew by.

[@DanaYi13]

Well researched and put together! I like it

[@friendlyneighborhoodsoviet4512]

Strongly agree!

[@hey.tobiii]

agreed

[@xuananator]

Totes

[@sleepykaizu]

hello

[@warpspeedchic8540]

It was surprising to see you here, i dont know why, youre a speedcuber yourself

[@piperguballa5078]

??!! I found my old rubix cube and then instantly got recommended this video thank you fbi agent

[@mathguy101]

It is spelled rubik’s

[@dots223_]

Same! Today I was doing my Rubik’s cube for the first time in months and this video got recommended to me.

[@martinbecker1380]

@@mathguy101 r/whoooosh

[@speedytutlz8474]

@@martinbecker1380 define r/woooosh please

[@charlie_mario6292]

Peeper Gumball it’s Rubik’s not rubix you uncultured swine

[@wuhaoouyang7453]

Feliks is a legend. I agree these speed cubers have pushed the "impossible" limit further and further.

[@WcropoliX]

And also his mic is awsome

[@toxic2971]

Tymon is better

[@futuregmchess1561]

@@toxic2971 He's not talking about who is faster. He is talking about who pushed the times to the limit; and that would have to be Feliks. At his prime, no one even came close to him. At Tymon's prime (probably now), Max, Leo, Luke, and a few others are still on his heels. Heck, he doesn't even have the WR average anymore.

[@toxic2971]

@@futuregmchess1561 I don't know what he wrote exactly but it says edited so yeah

[@mdv9831]

He really is. But as time goes on the next generation gets better, even though Feliks isn't the best anymore he certainly was the face we all saw when we got into cubing. The guy who we all wanted to beat

[@PaulTaylor1]

14:38 Dog be like I could solve that cube faster, but first I have more important things to attend to. 🐾💤

[@DanteYewToob]

I noticed something really cool... Some of them are actually throwing the cube down half turned and relying on gravity and impact to finish the last turn while they hit the clock. Pretty friggin cool.

[@maxwellli7057]

Yea cuz magnetic cubes are pretty nice

[@maxwellli7057]

@Super Crackers always get the strong magnets, medium and light magnets are usually pretty gei.

[@hpermutation4439]

No they don't do that... nobody does that

[@jasonlewiscuber2081]

@@hpermutation4439 yep they don't through it down but they do slam their hands down pretty fast

[@Ronanmai]

more than a half turn is still counted

[@skygge1006]

“Why it’s almost impossible for wired to to tell us about wires”

[@01X23]

thanks, you killed me

[@mackenziemarden451]

TELL ME ABOUT IT I’m still waiting on the wires on this channel

[@JohnKhith-n1s]

Fishy gang

[@demonictowtoe7983]

Not funny didn’t laugh

[@tessajohn77]

@@demonictowtoe7983 o.k

[@rbe.a]

*Asian Guy:* solves it in 3 seconds *me:* boasts about solving it in 2 minutes

[@DrZaneK]

in 4 seconds* nobody has a sub-3 yet 3.47 isnt in 3 seconda

[@slowmotionbetterthannomotion.]

Dr. ZaneK its a 3 second solve.

[@hakkai5819]

Thats faster than me solving 2x2

[@ronniechatterjee6490]

Haven't solved one

[@zedmelon]

@RabiyaNoor Hahahah, me too. I recall being proud of 2.5 minutes! (now I'd be pleased if I still have it somewhere packed in a box)

[@waza987]

Back in the 80s under 3 minutes was considered mastering the cube. Now that’s just not bad for a newbie after a couple of days.

[@dwijaksara]

For a non cuber, he's done a pretty good job reaching a sub 1 min solve. Props to him

[@RobertBeckk]

I remember when I finally got my solves down below around 3 minutes because I would start a song and try to solve it before it ended.

[@Quantum-]

@@RobertBeckk it was such a quick transition for me, I think a week in I was sub 3 minutes. Once I hit 1 minute solves is when I really slowed progress. To get consistent under 1 minute f2l and 2 look just aren't enough for my fingers. It really took me studying oll cases to shave seconds. I still only know about half of them at best.

[@DirtyPoul]

@@Quantum- Yup. I only know the standard beginner solve and I can consistently solve it under 1 min, probably around 50 sec average. Or rather, I used to be able to do that. I haven't solved in years so rusty is an understatement.

[@Quantum-]

@@DirtyPoul I can't even remember how to do the beginners method. Lol. I think I used it to solve my puzzle maybe my first 10 times, saw a speed cubing video and was learning f2l that day. Intuitive f2l only has a few algorithms and they're short.

[@user-me8hy8ew4o]

@@Quantum- Beginners Method is like intuitive f2l, just that you would now understand why you do these moves. But I know what you mean, I wanted to teach a friend how to solve a cube and I googled the beginner's method to show her because I couldn't remember

[@MisanCuber]

Human in 19th century: "We can't travel faster than 40 mph."

[@AtheistGamerz]

Trains could go faster than 40mph

[@azearaazymoto461]

Modern trains maybe. I’d imagine trains back then couldn’t though. It was the 1800’s.

[@AtheistGamerz]

@@azearaazymoto461 it was rare but they could top out at 55-60mph.

[@azearaazymoto461]

Cool.

[@azearaazymoto461]

Cool.

[@hendy24]

Wired: "It's almost impossible to solve a Rubiks Cube in under 3 seconds" Ruihang Xu: "2.68. Take it or leave it."

[@iwishexamsneverhappened]

He did say almost impossible

[@hendy24]

@@iwishexamsneverhappened yeah that's why I wrote that

[@chimyshark]

@MUFC the fk?

[@yeadai89]

leo borromeo also 2.78

[@BenjaJohnsonIII]

Please tell me where in the world records is a 2.68 solve. Cus I don’t see it

[@attila0323]

I learned to solve Rubik's Cube more than 15 years ago with a really old "rusty" cube. I was so hyped that I solved it every day a few times and it took me less than a week to memorize the moves. A few years ago I bought a faster cube but still only able to solve it in a few minutes. I just ordered a "speed cube" and will learn the speed cube method to be able to solve it under a minute or half. Can't wait for it.

[@AdvaitDhingra]

Usually, when non-cubers talk about cubing, it's kina cringey. But this video was really well made and fun to watch, even for speedcubers such as myself. Good job!:)

[@rewinged-insanemc9595]

Yeah. It annoys me when my classmate is a non cuber and when i turn the corners due to it being twisted and say im a cheater. even though its impossible to solve due to the cube gets messed up when you try to solve it

[@AdvaitDhingra]

Mere ereM been there😂

[@triple7marc]

Mere ereM That’s happened to me too 😂

[@AdvaitDhingra]

Daniel27D thats right

[@buzzmas8068]

Agreed, they arent pretending that you have to be a genius to solve one

[@viewfromthehighchair9391]

Back in 1980 (high school for me), I solved a cube in about 33 seconds and my average time was about 35 seconds. It was an old-style cube, of course; however, a friend of mine sped up the cube by putting graphite in it to lubricate it. Thing turned like a dream.

[@ustbot7047]

Chernobyl the series taught me that graphite is dangerous

[@viewfromthehighchair9391]

@@ustbot7047 No doubt but I was a stupid teenager at the time. Cubes now are better. :-)

[@braidos.k3657]

@@ustbot7047 only because the graphite was exposed to the radiation in the core of the reactor though, graphite in a pencil is fine

[@austinkomachi]

i’m 1980 if you solved it in 35 seconds average you would be basically world class. That’s quite amazing. I am saying this based on the fact that world class cubers in early 2000s averaged about 20 seconds i think

[@viewfromthehighchair9391]

@@austinkomachi To be fair, I solved cubes all day long since I didn't have video games to obsess over. Later on, I got really good at Minesweeper and Jezzball. TeeHee

[@Trexrush1]

Probably the best mainstream cubing video since the Vox Observatory episode in 2015. Id dare say its even better than that video. Excellent job Wired!

[@aaronrosberg5302]

There are actually 43,252,003,247,489,856,000 or in short 43 quintillion different combinations to the rubiks cube

[@emps2376]

"almost" *patrick ponce is very satsisfied with that 2.99*

[@wilsonxie]

ericaaaa

[@EvanWrightSpeedcubing]

His record has been broken twice

[@The_NSeven]

@@EvanWrightSpeedcubing Yeah, but those solves are very controversial. The 2.82 is pretty believable, but he took the video down for some reason

[@titussutterfield9439]

Who got a 2.82?

[@The_NSeven]

@@titussutterfield9439 Kim Roger Høyland Larsen. www.reddit.com/r/Cubers/comments/bqiw7d/282_3x3_uwr_single_kim_roger_høyland_larsen/? Here is a Reddit thread about it

[@JugheadJones03]

That guy got really good, really fast. 50 seconds in that short of time is impressive.

[@fritzsoze7329]

@CAN00192 Ye you have internet, google, books, bunch of methods, but he didnt. That's the different

[@mcpebox8880]

It's not. Its normal. You can literally learn to solve it under 2 min in a day if you got a paper with algorithms.

[@JugheadJones03]

@@mcpebox8880 I need to get me one and try lol!

[@BlancoWilliams]

I got 40 seconds in 1 and a half week with beginner method, it’s not hard, I used the rubiks brand cube and it slowed me down to 1min and then I got a better cube and got down to 40 seconds

[@isaacdavis1363]

@@JugheadJones03 I got down to 1,44 in like 2 days,

[@neerajnandan3519]

Another asian kid solves cube in 2.5 seconds WIRED: Why is almost impossible to solve a Rubik's cube under 2 seconds.

[@wakkle]

Actually 2 people has had unofficial world record.

[@louisbar111]

Who is it

[@Bob-uh9fw]

@equal rights equal fights GENDER EQUALITY what about Ben baron’s 2.83 solve

[@wakkle]

@@Bob-uh9fw oh yeah i meant 3 ben baron max park sameer aggarwal

[@wakkle]

@@albertluo2293 I know I'm not 100% sure that they didn't fake it. but ban baron is a past world record holder and his UWR solve reconstruction got shown in a lazer0monkey video. max park is probably one of, if not the best big cube solver, as he has the world record for 5x5, 6x6, 7x7. sameer I don't really have anything that backs up this solve, but he averages sub 8 in comps so i guess it's possible

[@mboss7733]

In middle school, it was one of my dreams to solve one. I got one for Christmas around that time and learned to solve it within about a month. I'm not really into it anymore, but those were fun times.

[@vagerplayz1999]

i solved it for 4 days😭😭

[@Axel-kc5se]

The title: "Why It's Almost Impossible to Solve a Rubik's Cube in Under 3 Seconds" Robot solving it in under 1 sec: "Ahaha poor humans!"

[@aa9amer]

Aklos because it’s a robot idiot

[@GalaxyGuy305]

@@aa9amer because it's a joke you idiot

[@JustNuggie]

@theXguy exactly, you idiot

[@oceanix91]

*hOLy cRaP tHIS gOT inTEsE*

[@davidnewhart2533]

I don't know. Even robots fear Rubik's Cube.

[@yhmixel]

1x1x1: allow me to introduce myself

[@Ryo_San_]

lol

[@kingkaizoku85]

you arent a cuber. Every cuber knows that the 1x1 is impossible, Expensive and not even Albert einstein was able to solve it

[@alexhall1862]

My name is CUBE! C to the U B. I used to move rubicks layers by the WT.

[@imran19187]

@@alexhall1862 lol u spelt cub not cube

[@shabanaasgher6353]

1x1 is solved by just flipping it

[@ryanbaker1097]

"something the cubers call algorithms" as if that's not what they're called

[@beekeeperhoneymoon8179]

@@deekay1306 Woooosh

[@flyintheH2O]

@@deekay1306 He's saying that it's not just cubers that call them them that. That's what they're called by everybody because that's what they ARE. It would be like saying, "People who like to tan refer to the ball of gas in the sky as the sun." It IS the sun. It's not just something one group calls it.

[@Novasky2007]

How do you ever figure out when to use an algorithm, all i see is a jumble of colours

[@Novasky2007]

Odd we call it by its correct name in our group of Orbital Mechanics Physicists: Sol

[@hakkai5819]

screw algorithms! Just call them 'Up, Left, Right, Down'

[@TheSilentHeel]

This was an unexpectedly fascinating video!! Loved it!

[@thomas3793]

7:49 This is day one, hour zero Thanks for 1k like

[@Theno__]

I Understood That Reference

[@ryandunklee634]

Kid just don’t(cap be like)

[@stoned565]

Mike bald

[@alejrandom6592]

M I K E B O Y D

[@marcusinternet]

mike boyd my dude

[@LordMostafa]

Wired: It's Almost Impossible to Solve a Rubik's Cube in Under 3 Ruihang Xu: SIKE

[@futuregmchess1561]

You got da wrooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooong numba!

[@garvitpandia8059]

*Oooohhhhhh*

[@lewislittlewood5038]

i think there’s like 5 sub 3 unofficial solves now haha

[@aiSage48]

"almost"

[@mememaster8368]

Keyword "almost". They never said its impossible

[@mccanby1234]

"1 minute and 41 seconds, I'm ashamed of myself." Dude I haven't even solved one.

[@Shrek-jv6fb]

Same I just brake it and fix it

[@oraakkeli]

Not trying to flex or anything, but my personal best is 15 sec on the dot

[@ZiRR0]

I have an average of about 1 minute and 40 seconds, and I have to say, it is shameful.

[@oneismajor4863]

1 month of practice (1-2 hours a day) can get you less than a minute. I started in December 2018 and now I avg 20-26 seconds and a PB of 16.85. PB is personal best btw.

[@elthpiano]

My best is 23s

[@_wetmath_]

Max Park: Is that a challenge?

[@mark-antonymosley3697]

I love this video. I haven’t really met anyone else that speed cubes but I’ve been speed cubing for around 10 years now which is a little under half my life. I felt the “kids these days don’t realize how good they have it”. I can buy a really good 3x3 online for $60 or a still really good but cheap cube for $15. Back in the day the only way was to go to Walmart or target, get a crappy rubiks brand, take a dremel to almost all the peices to round all the edges of every price so it could corner cut a little, then dump a whole container of Vaseline in it. When learning all the faster methods that take hundreds of algorithms, this video doesn’t mention that any set of moves repeated enough times will return the cube back to original. And they could have even dipped into all the other shape puzzles. They could’ve shared about 18x18s, cuboids, shape mods, pyriminxs, etc... this hobbie is like no other and people think your a genius when really you just watched some KZbin videos. But being able to solve a cube in under 20 seconds every time is pretty cool to show people

[@kavyag6405]

What video(s) would you recommend for a beginner to learn to solve a 3x3?

[@mark-antonymosley3697]

@@kavyag6405 look up “how to solve a Rubik’s cube”, the Chanel is Dan Brown. Watch the original I think there’s two parts and they’re like 14 years old. Those are the ones I watched back in the day

[@kavyag6405]

@@mark-antonymosley3697 Okay thanks, I’ll try that!

[@notoro]

@@kavyag6405 for me how i learned to solve it is by jperm

[@xxHumilde]

Dont know how i did it but i did read all that 👍🏼🔥🔥🔥

[@gloz6662]

2069: why its almost impossible to solve a rubik's cube in under 1 second

[@jitendrasoni4639]

Well it could be true because it will be 2069 lol

[@depressedkimjongun2513]

@@jitendrasoni4639 paabji mobbile Jk

[@ZahinYEETS]

5018: why its impossible to solve a rubik's cube in 0.0000000000000000000000000092827607 nanoseconds.

[@tim43s56]

Hardware isn’t now as important as it used to be, but overall this is the best cubing documentary by mainstream media. Great job!

[@med8615]

whats the best 3x3 i can get

[@tim43s56]

UZ depends, generally people say either the gts2m/gts3m (very similar) or the gan 356 X are the best it depends on preference. For a budget try the YJ MGC or QiYi warrior W.

[@med8615]

@@tim43s56 cool thanks man

[@Endxrrr]

i feel like the happiest man alive when many people say “its nearly impossible to solve a rubik’s cube” or “ The rubik’s cube is the most difficult hobby” because as a cuber averaging 30 seconds feels bad (for me) many non-cubers think im Albert Einstein 😅, thanks

[@pedrosantos1480]

Until now I only have heard about Partik Ponce's unoficial solve of 2.99 seconds

[@PrideSP]

When do they mention that at?

[@howtolife3737]

There are a lot of unofficial solves... mats got a 3 second solve in 2016 during his practice solve at wca comp

[@davetechme]

Ah, memories. I played with a cube for a few months some decades ago. Using the Petrus method, because I found it more intuitive as a beginner and I didn't want to memorize too many algos, I got it down to about 20 seconds with my terrible hand dexterity and lack of algos. Good times! After I had kids, I found an old cube and found I could still love it in under a minute.

[@NbNgMOD]

I also love cubes under a minute

[@sirkomic8474]

Bro, I'm also at around 17 - 20 seconds, and I know CFOP, with full PLL and almost full OLL. Don't sell yourself short, you were at an amazing pace.

[@qwerty_qwerty]

Please, what is the petrus method? I've wanted to know for ages but everyone refuses to talk about it lol

[@stc_]

Wired: It is almost impossible to solve a Rubiks Cube in under 3 seconds Patrick Ponce: Hold my beer

[@jbruso123]

Max Park just set the world record for 3.134 seconds. Granted, not under 3 yet... but dam, that's close.

[@sandro3103]

actually there are a lot of unofficial sub 3 solves

[@Cosmossidney]

@@sandro3103 true

[@anirudhpuranik5222]

Now I want to know who is that genius who developed the algorithms to solve the Rubik's cube.

[@KP-qv7on]

Jessica friddich invented cfop which a lot of people use

[@hallwayraptor2036]

As with everything, it was many people iterating over a long period of time with incremental break throughs that built in the previous person's discoveries.

[@26mineaxes]

Gilles Roux invented Roux

[@claytonstuart]

Jessica Freedrich invented CFOP I probably spelled that wrong

[@26mineaxes]

@@claytonstuart yeah u did but its correct non the less😁 (its Fridrich btw)

[@orionsbelt3252]

I think it's time you released a ''Why it's almost impossible to solve a Rubik's cube in under 2 seconds'' video.

[@mblada4916]

True

[@mrsamudhaful]

I think now should be one

[@doomestee]

The title said almost so obviously sort of unnecessary to change it when the entire video is based on 3s already. If it said literally impossible then that’s even less believable.

[@pavlenikacevic4976]

No, in the video, Felix said that unofficial sub-3 second solves have occurred. This is about average solves and not single solves, and getting lower than 3 seconds on average is probably practically unachievable

[@BenjaJohnsonIII]

Why if the world record is still above 3 seconds so this video still stands

[@gamerepic9332]

Nobody: 10 year old cubers: lol this guy did it so slow i can do it in 30 its not even that hard

[@kevinbones8599]

Cuberious same bro

[@zaneaustin22]

KAMINI SUNDARAVADANAM LMAO U FELL FOR THE BAIT

[@Yafama]

Lan Bach ...you know bragging is point not the time, right?

[@iheartchi]

Holy so true

[@Ezio470]

I'm 24 and i stopped improving since i averaged under 30 secs....i dont see the need anymore. I don't compete and 30 secs is already very impressive to people around me

[@aidannodomm]

1:05 the person to his right, Mats Valk held the world record, then the person who solved the cube, broke the world record by 1 milisecond.

[@raulrosu]

Mats Valk did 4,74 and Feliks Zemdegs then did 4,73. Technically the difference between this two values is 0,01 seconds and it is a centisecond and not a millisecond ☆ But both speedcubers are crazy 😳

[@etzstyy6301]

"Shes so good she can do it one handed"

[@Astral_YT]

candi YT oh god XD

[@etzstyy6301]

@@Astral_YT lol

[@MinutemenSyndrome]

Lmao

[@etzstyy6301]

R/whoooosh

[@MinutemenSyndrome]

@@evanlynch2288 r/woooosh

[@drink15]

Why It's Almost Impossible (for me) to Solve a Rubik's Cube in Under 3 days.

[@jagadish20091]

I can solve one in 20 mins

[@nerdfighter2004]

1 minutes

[@Icyyyyyyyfrmsz]

my record is 29 sec

[@sophiekaplann]

Me- *years

[@RaulAyanami]

5 minutes with amateur algorithms

[@cloroxbleach7554]

1:53 You can see the best of the best back then solved it in 25 secs, nowadays some people in my circle of friends that don't even cube that much do even faster. Only a few decades have passed and we're like aliens compared to people decades ago.

[@shabanamirza9226]

the fact that he has a pillow that is like a Rubik's cube really shows that this guy is dedicated to what he does

[@kelvin31272]

"Why it is almost impossible to solve a Rubik's cube under 3 seconds" *oho-hooo,* don't challenge the power of our lord _Feliks Zemdegs_

[@yourlocalwhat8272]

agree completely

[@BotanCheung]

And Max Park

[@yeshichoden3409]

He did it in 3.3 didn’t he? Recently last month

[@leoli7975]

And Max

[@itscooltocube4482]

max park did a 2.88 solve yesterday. check his insta

[@BilalAhmed5]

I’m currently trying to solve a Rubik’s cube. This is my 6th year.

[@fuckinolive6053]

Good luck

[@uhhhhi3779]

Lol just bought my first one ever today. Only took 32 years

[@kristijantodorovski5790]

@MCPE Redstone get fast about 1 and a half minutes and than switch to cfop or roux

[@shouryamathur3712]

@@kristijantodorovski5790 isn't a minute too early

[@pjtato5390]

I can only solve 15 seconds :(

[@unity9214]

Him: it’s impossible to solve a cube in under 3 seconds Me: *pulls out 2x2* Edit:wow thanks so much for 250 likes! I have never had anything near this only like 5 or 6

[@ffhaste1736]

It is a cube, and my best is 1.78

[@owenanderson2133]

Nah man you gotta pull out the 1x1

[@unity9214]

@@owenanderson2133 ikr

[@pianodna-james3147]

A 2-2 WR is under 1 sec I think

[@Zenith_682]

Amateur, just pull out a 1x1. Fastest time is I believe 0 seconds

[@clapshotxd3049]

Wired: It's impossible to solve a cube in under 3 seconds Ruihang Xu: Does a 2.68 second solve

[@Orbitz2x]

Speed Cubers be like: I am speed

[@sethphilbrick7632]

Floatin' like a Cadillac, Stinging like a Beamer

[@izzy3120]

I am, the god of speed

[@dreww.4461]

Eventually someone will find a skip to clip the cubies through each other by executing frame perfect algorithms, warping the cubes into the correct positions.

[@goldenwarrior1186]

Drew W. And if you get one move wrong, time will stop and nothing will exist anymore. If you succeed, then the credits will start playing and you'll hear some happy music playing in the background.

[@notmrcrowley9757]

r/unexpectedspeedrunning

[@roboticjo2183]

what will the clip be named?

[@ariffumbreon5946]

ROFL

[@mrpipeher]

The most underrated comment

[@MichaelAussie05]

Brilliantly written, filmed, performed and edited. Thanks to all those involved for your time and efforts on producing a thoroughly entertaining and informative video. Cheers.

[@Chirp197]

Tymon Kolasiński: laughs in fast

[@ChompyMaster]

Fr lmao. Sub 5 average is just crazy

[@bvcghh1684]

@@ChompyMaster he also got a sub 3 unofficial solve

[@ShynyMagikarp]

This might be the best "Almost Impossible" episode there is. This one has less exceptions, less leaps in logic and steps, etc. It's a good episode.

[@MoneyManHolmes]

Some of these “almost impossible” videos are getting ridiculous. This one was a fun watch though.

[@jakezimmer7256]

Gotta admire the dedication for a 15 minute youtube video

[@origamiwithrami]

3x3x3 is so hard. me solving it in under 5 months “oh really”

[@zoonova149]

I literally learned how to solve a rubiks cube in 2 hours after that i can do it without instructions

[@PRDGL_WindyBW]

@@zoonova149 Don't undermine their achievement! Solving a Rubik's Cube is impressive as is.

[@briansewelloutdoors8404]

@@PRDGL_WindyBW I’ve been trying for fourteen years

[@PRDGL_WindyBW]

@@briansewelloutdoors8404 Wired made a really good guide on how to solve it. You can watch that and solve it.

[@briansewelloutdoors8404]

@@PRDGL_WindyBW i watched and did all the steps but always had a wrong color cube in my sides

[@TheDeadlockArchives]

I love the Rubik's cube, my mother bought me one for Christmas one year thinking id never solve it, by lunch time I had solved it. and ever since that day I can now solve it in around 20 seconds on average, sometimes faster, I use it as a stress releif. I also use it as a way to remind myself that I am capable of teaching myself anything no matter what.

[@notosdude]

Ok fine KZbin. I watched it. Gosh.

[@tharshena9283]

Lmaoo

[@earth11116]

Lol

[@picklesman8]

He said gosh111!1!!1!!!!!!1!1!1!

[@ToastyDiano]

That makes us Australians proud that there is a record breaking speed cuber thats Australian

[@riplikatlnloki5091]

B4S1C beat by an Asian guy lol

[@ToastyDiano]

@@riplikatlnloki5091 ikr

[@Skikorski]

Matt valk is dutch and im dutch too

[@jjpaq]

@@riplikatlnloki5091 Lost the WR single. Still holds the record average, which considering the PLL skip on Yusheng Du's solve is honestly more impressive to me. Not knocking Yusheng, that double X-cross took skill.

[@joost6994]

It's also very impressive since you have to do it upside down.

[@davedonovan2681]

this guy is phenomenal. great content every time. he also taught me how to solve a Rubik's cube. Thanks!

[@nikitadas9671]

which guy exactly?

[@rotimi22]

kzbin.info/www/bejne/iF61YX6ojduKmMU this guy

[@abhay_007]

hey, dave how much time do you take to solve the cube using Wired's method. Can it be under 1 minute?

[@mcwithshift]

@@abhay_007 I learned using that method, and I got under 1 minute eventually. But if you really want to get faster you need to learn things like Intuitive F2L, 2-Look OLL, and 2-Look PLL just for starters. Also optimize look-ahead, turn speed, and if you don't have a good cube I reccomend the RS3M 2020 or 2021 since it's cheap and very good. (i now average 20s)

[@Nameiscool420]

I could barely get under 2 minutes with wireds method. But that's probably not the methods fault because I was using an old Rubik's cube I lost then found in the dirt. This cube wasn't even a 1980s cube, it was made in like 2017

[@BaconTheLegend1]

“No matter how good you are, there’s always one kid better than you”