One myth I used to repeat that turns out is wrong - That the manual wind Speedy was chosen because automatics dont work in zero gravity. The reality is that automatic chronographs didnt exist until the very late 1960s, so none were available in the early years of the Apollo program
@CasualWatchReviews9 ай бұрын
Yep I remember that one! The seiko pogue went to space and that was an auto chronograph I later found out.
@robertbarta49128 ай бұрын
Also because automatics in most cases can still be wound and also they do work in zero gravity, they are powered by the motion of your arm.
@chronocommander0078 ай бұрын
Inertia is perfectly capable of substituting for gravity in portering an automatic watch. They must have known this.
@WatchMeEDC8 ай бұрын
The official NASA requirements for chronographs in the 1965 RFP was quote - “the chronographs may be electronically, manually or the self-winding type; however, it must be capable of being manually wound and re-set” end quote. Rolex launched the Oyster Perpetual automatic movement in 1931 so there were automatic watches for a long time by 1964 and Rolex submitted their test watches. The requirement was a chronograph which Rolex did not have an auto movement for. They submitted a Cosmograph with a manual Valjoux 72 movement (not a Daytona).
@patrickhopkinson18518 ай бұрын
There were no automatic chronographs in 1965 to choose from. The first automatic chronographs (Zenith, Seiko and the Breitling/ Heuer/ Buren one) came out in 1969, after NASA had chosen the Speedmaster.
@petemulhearn77878 ай бұрын
I bought a Speedmaster Professional in 1968. I was in the RAF and flying gliders at the time and needed a chrono for navigation because it was map, compass, watch and looking out the window at the time. I still have said watch, and the receipt from the NAAFI
@CasualWatchReviews8 ай бұрын
Well thats an awesome story in its own right.
@Redondo_dom9 ай бұрын
It's because there was a waitlist
@spittinvenom98439 ай бұрын
😂 i spit out my coffee, 😂
@mattkanfer72569 ай бұрын
Ha!
@giorgiodelpalatinato67189 ай бұрын
😂😂😂 But no, the Daytona was in the race too.
@jtwu89319 ай бұрын
Because the AD wants to sell them Tudors.
@cqc22388 ай бұрын
🤣🤣🤣
@PhantomObserver9 ай бұрын
Fun fact: one of the problems NASA and Ragan ran into was that while the Apollo astronauts were issued the Omega watches for training on Earth, it wasn’t a permanent issue; they were expected to return the watches to NASA once the training was finished and the mission was over. A lot of them didn’t, until Ragan complained to Deke Slayton the head of the astronaut office. Slayton told the astronauts they wouldn’t be allowed to use NASA’s T38 aircraft (which they used to commute around NASA’s training sites cross-country) until the watches were returned.
@CasualWatchReviews9 ай бұрын
That is interesting! I didn’t know that.
@iggytse8 ай бұрын
And I am guessing this is how a Bulova ended up on the moon. It was a personal watch that later got auctioned for $1.6 million.
@PhantomObserver8 ай бұрын
@@iggytse Not quite. Bulova was never on the original list of watchmakers NASA contacted for chronograph testing, because at the time Bulova didn’t make a chronograph that met NASA’s specifications. Once Bulova’s president Omar Bradley (yes, the former general) found out, Bulova began lobbying Congress to put NASA under a “Buy American” procurement policy so that Bulova could be put on the list of space watch providers during the next procurement cycle in the 1970s. As part of this, Bulova used their military connections to give Apollo 15 astronaut Dave Scott a prototype they developed for the next NASA set of trials. Bulova never got the prototype back because the Apollo 15 crew landed in a postal first cover scandal, and Scott was told not to return the watch to avoid giving Bulova an unfair advantage while competing for the contract.
@ebgbass9 ай бұрын
Hi Sam- I first discovered the Speedmaster by watching your early videos including the paper clip clasp repair! Immediately loved that watch with the hesalite crystal and sapphire case back. I went on to purchase one and have never looked back, it is still my favorite and I will keep it forever; even the local Omeaga boutique staff find it to be a special model that stands out among the many other iterations. Keep up the great work!!
@CasualWatchReviews9 ай бұрын
Wow! Well I very much appreciate you watching for so long. Seems like a lifetime ago that first Omega video. Glad you love yours. That is the true grail I think in this hobby, finding a watch that you love year after year.
@WatchMeEDC8 ай бұрын
Good dialogue and vid. I encourage people to check out the testing results of the watches, really fascinating to see how poorly some of the brands/watches fared in the tests. Granted it was the 1960’s but some of the failures with the Hamilton, Rolex and others were catastrophic. (edit: If memory serves me correctly the Speedmaster was the only one to actually “pass” all the grueling tests, not that they survived all tests since most rigorous testing goes beyond the “pass” limits. I heard that NASA was quite hopeful that the Hamilton watches would do well since it was an American watch company but alas it did not do well at all.
@patrickhopkinson18518 ай бұрын
Hamilton kept on trying and used Congress in an attempt to force the issue. The Omega Speedmaster kept winning though.
@jorgerobles6288 ай бұрын
Hamilton never got tested coz they sent a Pocket Chronograph, not a Wrist Chronograph, and that stuff that NASA was hoping for Hamilton to pass was some story that circulated at the time and was later debunked.
@jorgerobles6288 ай бұрын
@@patrickhopkinson1851 Sorry to say but Hamilton was not the watchmaker which insisted to have its watches tested, it was Bulova under the influence and request of General Bradley who was the President of Bulova at the time, and then Omega passed everything while the Bulova failed. And that was because Bulova was pushing the idea of Buying American Items.
@patrickhopkinson18518 ай бұрын
@@jorgerobles628 Thanks for the correction, it was indeed Bulova. I didn’t have the book to hand when writing the comment.
@antonyreyn9 ай бұрын
Great video, fun fact the first watch on the moon Buzz Aldrins Speedy was used because Armstrongs had to be left on the ship because the Bulova clock on board failed. Aldrin watch is now 'missing' after he posted it back to NASA. Then on Apollo 15 Dave Scott's Speedy 'failed' leading to him using his Bulova. So it's like a reverse. Cheers
@camarocarl71309 ай бұрын
Scott's Speedy: first watch to break on the Moon.
@antonyreyn9 ай бұрын
@@camarocarl7130 yeh but there is also the suspicion it was just a way to get an American brand watch on to the Moon. Cheers
@Supercruze9 ай бұрын
I had heard that some of the early Mercury 7 astronauts; in particular Wally Schirra, wore his personal Omega Speedmaster into space on the early Mercury missions. Other astronauts caught on and purchased their own Speedmasters. I believe NASA then saw the need for a watch to endure the rigors of space travel and thus the testing program and selection process began. Ibn 1962 Scott Carpenter wore a Breitling Navitimer into space and when he exited the capsule upon splashdown the watch promptly flooded. I believe Breitling still has this watch in its museum. Not saying the Omega Speedmaster is any more water resistant.
@Docmeff14 ай бұрын
Ragan goes into more detail and lists the multitude of tests used and the Omega was the only one that survived all tests and worked as it did prior to the tests. He even talks about how he serviced many kf the watches as well.
@paulwi578 ай бұрын
I think Carpenters Breitling Cosmonaute was made at the request of NASA , Carpenter wanted a watch that had a 24 hour dial so one sweep in 24 hours instead of two to avoid confusion as to day or night. Also I believe Breitling was the first to have the slide rule bezel to calculate navigation. Please correct if I’m wrong
@CasualWatchReviews8 ай бұрын
I think we covered this is a show a long time ago. Yes very interesting story around the Breitling watch! Thanks for sending the photo!
@joshuam46149 ай бұрын
Wally Schirra was the first astronaut to wear a Speedmaster. He wore his own watch when he first went into space in 1962.
@lestercombs18719 ай бұрын
My all time favorite Astronaut. RIP
@jorgerobles6288 ай бұрын
Yes, Schirra used the Omega Ref CK2998 Speedmaster.
@MadMax76er9 ай бұрын
I cant be there for the live streams or always spare the time to rewatch at a later date so these excerpts of interesting discussions are a great idea
@dezinedude14178 ай бұрын
So while I own a well working Seiko Pogue, the reason for choosing Omega is not nearly as intriguing as why NASA has lost all film footage of the Kubrick inspired pseudo-moon set.
@kellingtonlink9568 ай бұрын
Great story. Thanks for the video.
@MrGrentch8 ай бұрын
The "space watch" was pretty much an afterthought. As the chap pointed out they had a tiny budget. It was a tiny side project not considered essential for flight. If it had been they almost certainly would have approached a watch company(likely American) to build a watch specifically to their specs. Much like they had with the Bulova Accutron clocks fitted to their spacecraft NASA did consider mission critical. SR71 Blackbird pilots had already been issued Accutron watches, but Accutron didn't have a chronograph/stopwatch. An actual designed for purpose space watch would likely look nothing like a civilian chronograph. Indeed Omega prototyped an evolution of one; the "Alaska". Didn't have "Speedmaster" on the high contrast white dial, the movement was housed in a hefty squareish steel case, fitted within an anodised aluminium clamshell to protect against temperature extremes, with very large chrono pushers so an astronaut could actually operate the functions on an EVA. Something that would have been near impossible with a standard chronograph. It didn't look too dissimilar to the huge and very legible(and simple)wrist worn bomb timers of the 1920's and 30's, designed to be operated in often open cockpits of aircraft by someone wearing gloves. So similar enough operating conditions. They didn't test a multitude of watches either. They only bought four off the shelf; Omega, Longines-Wittnauer, Hamilton and Rolex. The Hamilton was a pocketwatch so was dropped as an option almost immediately. The Longines-Wittnauer and Rolex were running the same movement. Hardly a great spread of options.
@simonwright68829 ай бұрын
Fascinating information to me as an owner of a 1961 pre moon example.
@stuartanderws57058 ай бұрын
I thought the watches were submitted by the watchmakers for NASA to bid for the contract. Omega was the winners by a long way. There were hoping that Rolex would win. I got my Speed Master as a present to myself for getting a first in my Horology degree. Neil Armstrong's watch from the moon landing has been lost. Buz has his because he bort it from NASA. Omega still make a speed Master for NASA today but it's a bit different. I think Omega gave Buz one, I know he has one.
@CasualWatchReviews8 ай бұрын
Hey Stuart, interested to hear more about your degree. the watches were bought from a normal jeweller, Dave discusses it in depth in this upload. Buzz's watch was the one that got lost on its way to the Smithsonian.
@stuartanderws57058 ай бұрын
@@CasualWatchReviews I guess if NASA got whatever they are selling at a store it can only get better if they improve it for space use. My Horology degree was at Birmingham School of Jewellery in England. First year is basics, second year you have repair some many clocks of each type (It would be watches but i focus on clocks) and make a platform cock and plate, balance wheel, staph and jewel mountings with jewels. 3rd year is more clocks for me and them make a clock of your desigme. Out of the 12 students in my year 10 went from Uni to work in London's large watch service centres. I like to make clock parts like 0.3Mx8 leaf pinions for carriage clocks and deadbeat escape wheels for platform escapements. But i do get a lot of Smiths striking clock types from the 20's and the 60's. My Speed Master had been back to Omega twic but still keeps worse time than a watch a fraction of its price. As soon as I find the time i'm just going to strip it myself. Something is bent inside I think, which is causing the timing trace to wonder up and down. Its loosing about 2 min a day. My 2892 looses about 5 min a month.
@Bob.martens9 ай бұрын
For the waterresistance of course:)
@a.j.e43499 ай бұрын
... Amazing insight information. Thankyou!
@stephenoliver14378 ай бұрын
I’ve a x33 speedmaster which I believe is the official omega supply for the European Space Station for all current astronauts
@CasualWatchReviews8 ай бұрын
I know there was x-33 watches used for the dragon launches.
@chronocommander0078 ай бұрын
The crystal on David Scott's Speedmaster popped out during a mission.
@WatchMeEDC8 ай бұрын
You mean Hesalite 😉
@chronocommander0078 ай бұрын
@@WatchMeEDC Yes, the acrylic crystal.
@WatchMeEDC8 ай бұрын
@@chronocommander007 seriously it’s just plastic… but “Hesalite” acrylic crystal sounds much better hehe.
@chronocommander0078 ай бұрын
@@WatchMeEDC "It's not just plastic, it's Hesalite!" 😁
@asleepzone55578 ай бұрын
That’s the same reason I got from Omega!
@spittinvenom98439 ай бұрын
Omega been milking it ever since but I still love’em
@geo8rge8 ай бұрын
Why did they need watches? They had clocks on the instrument panels, they were in contact with mission control, they could take astronomical measurements.😊
@CasualWatchReviews8 ай бұрын
I would encourage you to look into the moon landings a bit more. The clock on the lander actually broke. Neil Armstrong left his speedmaster behind so they could time the departure. If they didn't have that watch they could have mistimed it and missed the departure time and been stuck on the moon. Astronomical measurements wouldn't have helped them time the departure. Also, when you investigate you will find there was a delay in the commands coming from mission control and when they receive the transmissions. The Watches were actually vital to the mission.
@davecorry77239 ай бұрын
Ooo, that was great!
@thecrypto36628 ай бұрын
Didn't Bullova "gift" a watch to one of the astronauts?
@WatchMeEDC8 ай бұрын
Bulova was a part of the original test batch of watches. NASA was hopeful it would do well since it’s an American company but I believe it failed catastrophically during early testing.
@i60r148 ай бұрын
Love my Hesalite Moonwatch. Just want to remind to you all that Omega is official timekeeper of the olympic games since, well forever. Omega is Omega not because of the moonwatch. The monwatch is the moonwatch because it is an Omega.
@CasualWatchReviews8 ай бұрын
Hi! We covered the Olympics in the livestream this clip was taken from. An important part, you’re right. I would argue the moon watch is the moon watch because of NASA, who took it to the moon? As mentioned in this clip the speedmaster was designed for Italian car racing drivers.
@ChrisM-lb8xw8 ай бұрын
Because rolex AD tried to convince nasa how exclusive daytona was. Failed 🙃
@ClubmanGT19718 ай бұрын
Awesome. I finally bought mine in the 50th anniversary year of the moon landing.
@tracywilliams79299 ай бұрын
Personally I would have chosen a different watch. Ball Watches are a well respected old American brand. The Engineer II is incredibly rugged. Lives up to the motto: Accuracy under adverse conditions.
@WatchMeEDC8 ай бұрын
Well it wasn’t about personal choices, the watches selected were put through extremely rigorous testing. The watch that performed the best and passed the test criteria ended up being the watch that was selected.
@juniorjohnson59619 ай бұрын
Did you know that Omega coined the name Hesalite for the crystal ?
@CasualWatchReviews9 ай бұрын
I didn't but I totally believe that!
@WatchMeEDC8 ай бұрын
Specifically because it’s not crystal… NASA didn’t want glass shattering in zero gravity then cutting/puncturing the Astronauts suits or other things… and calling it polycarbonate or plastic probably wouldn’t have helped sales much 😉
@dad_jokes_4ever2268 ай бұрын
I'm guessing because money ?
@trisinogy9 ай бұрын
It’s even more amazing that modern tech fails at repeating moon landing… We’ve barely managed to land a few rovers over there, while in the 60s we sent dozens of people who spend days (!!!) on the Moon. Ain’t that unbelievable?
@Avto288 ай бұрын
Not that it matters to the legend but why does the narrative comes off as to somehow diminish the achievement of Omega if a random selection at a random jeweler performed better (broke less) than all other brands.
@CasualWatchReviews8 ай бұрын
Hey! Thanks for watching. I’m not sure I follow what you’re asking. Are you saying that omega are making too much of the history?
@dreamtube34338 ай бұрын
Well, I had 3 Speedys ( Day-Date, steel with 9300 movement and the current one with the 3861 movement). After owning Panerai, Breitling, Tudor over the years I have to say Omega was the worst brand by far. Only the one with the 9300 movement ran pretty much without issues. The worst was the 3861 caliber (chrono got stuck or didn't run properly, whole watch stopped being almost full wound.etc..A nightmare and it spend 4 months in repair. My opinion, never ever Omega. And the Speedmaster on the moon had a Lemania movement, obviously a quite good one...
@CasualWatchReviews8 ай бұрын
I had a speedy for 10 years without issue. The service only took 6 weeks. I also know a fair few omega collectors, some you can see on my livestreams (and ask directly) I have never heard of someone having that many issues, very sorry to hear that.
@dreamtube34338 ай бұрын
@@CasualWatchReviews Hi, well I know some watchmakers in Prague and Vienna that say the same thing. Omega is trying to keep the historical movement but also simultaneously innovating and changing the caliber. Which leads to problems. It seems to me that the issue is the same like with the " Land Rover Defender" A so called legendary car. But it is a piece of s... People love to spend money on stories (moon landing) packaged in products.....That is called marketing after all. I will write you a list of what keeps in breaking in the 1861 movement the most, for example.
@CasualWatchReviews8 ай бұрын
Yep, I will mention it on the livestream if we cover the subject again if you do. Thanks for watching.
@manuelmiranda26392 ай бұрын
Ninguém pode mudar o destino: omega 🛸👽✌️
@alvarocoutinho31038 ай бұрын
Hehehe… except for the fact that none of those guys ever set foot on the Moon.
@artkingofwholefoods748 ай бұрын
Should’ve have went with Seiko.
@abrahamlevi35568 ай бұрын
Seiko came out with the 7T92 quartz movement chronograph in the 90s that nowadays can be bought on Chrono24 or eBay for 150 bucks. No other chronograph movement be it mechanical, quartz, or Meca-Quartz can surpass it in terms of its functionality and reliability. It would have been the dream chronograph watch for the low flying fast fighter pilot who flew fast dead-reckoning. It has a 60/12 totalizer with split-time capability and a build-in flyback capability. All that the pilot, wearing his watch on the right hand that holds stick on the facing him and his left hand on the throttle, had to do is to push pusher A once before takeoff and then just push and re-push bottom B to check his ATA to checkpoints along the route throughout the duration of the sortie. The chronograph would catch up automatically after every split-time measurement. No other chronograph watch is capable of that, not even the most modern ones.
@petemulhearn77878 ай бұрын
@@abrahamlevi3556 A quartz watch would be problematic if used for EVAs first because the battery would not withstand the extreme heat and cold on the outside of a space suit and secondly the electronics would be susceptible to damage by high energy particles and radiation from the sun.
@tracywilliams79299 ай бұрын
That is not the original photo from the 1960s. The original shows Aldrin wearing a different watch probabl from his personal collection. To me it looks like a Bell pressurized but I am not saying it actually is one. It has more of a super elliptical face. This omega was doctored in as part of an advertising campaign. I assume Aldrin was compensated for it. I noticed the difference right away because Aldrin is my favorite astronaut and I always admired the original photo.
@TheStefmcd9 ай бұрын
I was told Bulova had submitted a new model that was designed for the moon missions but it failed NASA's tests, prompting them to grab existing models from other btands off jewellers shelves for testing. Is this nonsense?
@jonjanson80219 ай бұрын
The Omega failed so he had to use a Bulova. Bulova had been given the contract for the spacecraft timing modules and it's government policy to distribute contracts over a range of manufacturers.
@armandogomez26779 ай бұрын
I heard the bulova accutron was the best one for the job but omega paid nasa more money so they won. Despite it not the best one. In an attempt to still go into space they created a custom one off model and gave it to one of the astronauts whose omega broke and he had to use his bulova
@jonjanson80219 ай бұрын
I guess Omega can claim to be the first watch to malfunction on the moon.@@armandogomez2677
@WatchMeEDC8 ай бұрын
Bulova was not one of the 4 brands that entered into the final NASA testing. They were Rolex, Hamilton, Longines and Omega.
@WatchMeEDC8 ай бұрын
@@armandogomez2677 it was his personal Bulova. Astronaut Dave Scott on Apollo 15 wore it along with his Speedmaster as a back up and good thing because the Hesalite “crystal” popped off so he used his backup watch at his timekeeping device.
@muds11238 ай бұрын
They paid for it. Which is the Omega strategy. Doesn’t have the brand value of Rolex.
@christianklein57748 ай бұрын
I gues i know whay omrga done that or nasa without fwien that ; might its intresting tofindout what Timex say about and iff they had off a produkt delicate tothe spaceprogram .
@CasualWatchReviews8 ай бұрын
The Timex NASA used was not till the 1990s I made an upload on it here The Most Influential Timex Watch of the '90s: A Nostalgic Gem kzbin.info/www/bejne/q4fSo5Z3otOagsU
@HansZarkovPhD9 ай бұрын
Lowest bidder, like every government contract.
@QatarVegan8 ай бұрын
So Omega cheaper than Timex then?
@WatchMeEDC8 ай бұрын
That is not how the watches were selected. It was solely based on which model passed the rigorous test requirements.
@diego6464649 ай бұрын
So Rolex didn’t go to the moon, and is still a very successful brand, for other reasons. So if Omega had not been chosen, it would still exist… without the moonwatch !!! 😊
@CasualWatchReviews9 ай бұрын
I think this is a hard one because a lot of brands died off or got bought, Heuer for example. Omega lean so heavily into the Space connection it’s hard to imagine where they would be without it.
@jackthompson83778 ай бұрын
If only this was in English
@CasualWatchReviews8 ай бұрын
You should be able to activate the subtitles if you struggled at any of the parts. I will go back in and double check they are correctly worded.
@luckypennynumber72079 ай бұрын
Casio g-shock! Is the best 😤
@CasualWatchReviews9 ай бұрын
A lot of them are used in space but the G-Shock was released in 1983, the moon landing was 1969
@denbo748 ай бұрын
The Daytona failed yet that models seems to have done just fine over time
@CasualWatchReviews8 ай бұрын
Yes, good point!
@jamesbastian38268 ай бұрын
You don’t have to deal with 250°F temperature on earth. Rolex couldn’t take the heat.
@WatchMeEDC8 ай бұрын
The Daytona was not the chronograph submitted by Rolex though. The Daytona came out in 1963 and was probably brand new or not yet even available at the time of NASA requisition to Rolex USA to submit test pieces.
@denbo748 ай бұрын
@@WatchMeEDC no one submitted any models. NASA purchased several brands on their own at Jeremy stores and tested them. The Daytona was tested and failed. The Speedmaster did the best and was chosen.
@WatchMeEDC8 ай бұрын
@@denbo74 the Daytona was NOT submitted by Rolex. It was a Cosmograph with a Valjoux 72 movement. It failed multiple test but the hands melted during high temp test causing the watch to be inoperable. And Rolex was officially asked to submit watches along with 10 other manufacturers. 4 agreed to participate in the official NASA RFP.
@petersullivan30129 ай бұрын
Because Omega gave NASA a load of money to use them, it's called promotion. Same as Fisher with the Space pen, totally unesessary but NASA went with it for some reason, whereas the Russians just used pencils.
@illyth639 ай бұрын
Sorry, but almost everything in your comment is incorrect. Omega didn't pay NASA, nor did Fisher. If companies could simply pay NASA to use their products, NASA would be WAY better funded than it is. NASA doesn't even get money from the sale of products which use their logo (of which there are MANY, globally). The "for some reason" that NASA used the Fisher space pen is simply because it DOES actually work better than other ballpoint pens in microgravity. NASA also used pencils, especially mechanical pencils. Soviet cosmonauts used ballpoint pens and grease pencils -- the latter is extremely preferable to wooden pencils. Graphite can conduct electricity and create hazards in a spacecraft.
@CasualWatchReviews9 ай бұрын
You heard from Dave who spoke with James Raegan. He is the guy who did all the testing for NASA. He bought the watches and tested them himself. Omega didn’t pay him or NASA to select the watch. These watch companies were not the massive companies they are today back than. The truth is the watches did perform well, in fact one speedmaster made sure they didn’t die up there when the onboard mission clock failed.
@miabeatz809 ай бұрын
Funny that some folks get tired of a brand celebrating it's achievements while other brands come up with cool nicknames instead 😂
@ALL-il1sw9 ай бұрын
If paying was all it would take, they would have ended up with Rolex
@illyth639 ай бұрын
@@ALL-il1sw I'm not sure Rolex was the richest watch company in the 1960s. They were well regarded, but nothing like the market dominators they are today. I couldn't quickly find any data, but I'd bet other major brands probably had more cash to spend on something like that. If it was just a matter of marketing budget, it probably would have been Timex or someone like that.
@diego6464649 ай бұрын
What’s new about this? This has always been the official story. Thank you for the time waste. 😂
@CasualWatchReviews9 ай бұрын
Your welcome and thanks for watching!
@WilliamInternational9 ай бұрын
Nobody ever walked on the moon, so Omega should remove that stupid writing on the back of the watch.
@phill.29249 ай бұрын
Yes, and all the hundreds of pounds of moon rock that were returned from the moon missions that have no earth origin were a collection of meteorites. The same for the "faked" photos of the lunar reconnaissance orbiter that photographed each Apollo landing site. Maybe you should look into which scientists, even today, use the laser bounce experiment that is still activated on the surface of the moon.
@petemulhearn77878 ай бұрын
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@markgiles85279 ай бұрын
No one went to the moon, so who cares. Great watch but. 😂
@CasualWatchReviews9 ай бұрын
I clearly watched a documentary series where Wallace and Grommet had a picnic on the moon.
@spittinvenom98439 ай бұрын
A few did and the earth 🌍 is ….. no flat
@jorgerobles6289 ай бұрын
Yeah, and some people still believe that earth is flat, and the sun revolves around the Earth, and humans come from spontaneous generation.....
@jorgerobles6289 ай бұрын
@@CasualWatchReviews What a coincidence, I too watched it!!! Great documentary and the best proof Armstrong and Aldrin and the rest went to the Moon!!!!!
@antonyreyn9 ай бұрын
So the Russians were Americas biggest enemies at the time and also trying to get to the Moon but they didn't call it fake despite having the spying ability to steal all our Nuclear secrets! Unyet we should believe Internet rumours Cheers from Mars