To sum it up, the host cities take all the risk, the IOC takes all the rewards.
@Parlimant_Strifey4 ай бұрын
didn't even mention the part where the committee members were getting bribes from foolish people in the bidding. Yes, deal with those zero ethics & morals IOC members...instead of avoiding them like a plague.
@__jack________________22254 ай бұрын
Best comment so far.
@qj0n4 ай бұрын
It's too certain to call it a risk, it's a damage
@jankisi4 ай бұрын
Just like the UEFA
@Owlr4ider4 ай бұрын
@@jankisi Yes, but on a massively larger scale. UEFA Champions' League requires just 1 stadium for a single night and decent infrastructure: roads and public transportation, for everyone(the teams, staff, press, spectators, etc) to enter and leave the stadium in a decent enough manner. The Olympic Village on the other hand is orders of magnitude more demanding than that. Multiple stadiums hosting events over multiple weeks. Athletes, staff, press, etc, living in the city throughout the runtime of the event. Much more infrastructure is required, etc.
@averytucker7904 ай бұрын
Imagine being in a country where everyone wanted the main city to spend $5 billion on better housing, but the city said no. Yet when the Olympics was said to be held in that country. The City agreed to spend $52.6 Billion on a stadium, high speed rail system, and 30 luxury hotels for the athletes. I'm not surprised people protest against these games. Infact, I'm surprised more people don't protest against these games.
@SnifferSock4 ай бұрын
How does spending money on "better housing" work? People are supposed to pay to house themselves, what can the city do about it?
@techpriestsalok81194 ай бұрын
@@SnifferSocksubsidize them, incentivize builders to build cheaper/smaller houses, punish groups artificially racking up housing prices, build better public infrastructure that allows for more housing area to be utilized, etc. There is a whole lot the city government can do to help with housing issues, for every option I listed at least 10 reasonable sub options or full options exist.
@luisenriqueperezperez31934 ай бұрын
@@SnifferSock I'll give you an example. I'm from the Dominican Republic, we have something here called "Housing Bonus". That is a governmental subsidy that the government provides to FIRST TIME home buyers which is somewhere between USD$3-6K that can be applied to complete a missing part of the 10% down payment of a house/apartment or directly to the housing loan if the buyer has the complete down payment. What's the catch? Simple, the house/apartment has to cost USD$100k or less. This incentivizes construction companies to build low cost houses/apartments since this is essentially a guaranteed influx of buyers. The DR is now incredibly full of giant low cost apartment complexes, which makes it incredibly accessible for anyone to get their first house/apartment.
@Elmaestrodemusica4 ай бұрын
Chicago, until we protested it down ....
@averytucker7904 ай бұрын
@@techpriestsalok8119 Sir or Madam you're exactly 2,115% correct.
@savannahm.laurentian12864 ай бұрын
They used to utilize mostly existing facilities. Now they build dorms & venues. It's insanely wasteful.
@bipolarminddroppings4 ай бұрын
That's not even true. Did you watch the video? That happened for ONE Olympics.
@giraffestreet4 ай бұрын
More and more sports added into the game
@EstParum4 ай бұрын
Brazil built stuff for the Olympics@@bipolarminddroppings
@OK-hl6qd4 ай бұрын
@@bipolarminddroppings you didn't watch the video
@BuurmanDirk694 ай бұрын
@@bipolarminddroppings ah yes. Sydney, Athens, Beijing... Only one olympics
@kevindavies1893 ай бұрын
It’s really sad to see the state of many of these facilities. Here in Sydney, Olympic Park is still immaculate and frequently put to good use. It’s an area to be proud of.
@KatieBellino3 ай бұрын
That's great to hear! It seems like certain cities/countries are more capable of hosting. Sydney, LA, it seems like Paris has the venues and finances.
@SherlockHolmesb-kp4ru3 ай бұрын
@@KatieBellinoI am not so sure about Paris given the current news of the place
@SherlockHolmesb-kp4ru3 ай бұрын
@@flmis The seine river in particular comes to mind ,swimmers had to swim through a river with dangerous levels of e-coli and coincidentally they got sick
@AllMenMustServe3 ай бұрын
@@SherlockHolmesb-kp4ru But that was actually a good thing about the Olympics in Paris. Swimming in the Seine has been prohibited since 1923 because the water has been too toxic. They invested a whooping €1.4b to clean up the river. They just didn't complete the programme on time. But it will eventually be done and that's a good thing for the city. However, financially speaking, the Olympics as a whole is not profitable at all. And I mean for the City/Country itself, because for the IOC it is indeed highly profitable because they are the ones taking all the immediate revenue. Even for a city like Paris who only had to build 2 new venues and will definitely use those and not let them die like many host cities did previously, the daunty challenges of hosting such an event aren't covered by the global exposure and tourism the comes from it. Paris realized $8,7bn in Investments which will probably not be reimbursed with Cash Flows resulting from such investments in next few generations of population. Olympic Games are expensive, and French public finances are not in the best state. But hey, they hosted the Olympics, who cares? The big guys who wanted the Olympics hosted there probably earned some indirectly from it and will still be rich afterwards. But the common citizen, who only wants an healthy economy and the country to prosper will be the ones paying the debt for years to come through taxes. The insane amount of money invested on just logistics of planning the Olympics is enough to make something actual worth in the city/country. Like invest on healthcare, transportation, housing etc.
@kali70553 ай бұрын
Same in Munich, the Olympic Park here is iconic and full of people almost every day. The swimming and ice sport facilities in the park are actively used by the general public. There are frequent open air events in the park and concerts and sports games in the Olympic Stadium. People like to gather in the hills around the Olympic Stadium to have picnics and enjoy free concerts (Like the recent Taylor Swift one where over 30.000 people gathered in the hills outside). Our former Olympic Villages have become affordable housing for mainly students and are almost full.
@Azamat787264 ай бұрын
Why olympics are hosted by only 1 city instead of whole country ? Hosting it as a country might solve some issues like infrastructure and environment.
@Jorge23Costa4 ай бұрын
Technically they are hosted by the country and not by just one city, because for example this year you have events that will happen all across France, not only in Paris, including in Tahiti.
@NiallMcEvoy054 ай бұрын
Absolutely and would allow smaller countries to host aswell. Irish person here with a dream.
@xungnham13884 ай бұрын
They are hosted by the hole country. The host city is just where the main stadiums are. But they use stadiums hundreds of miles away. When Atlanta held the '96 games, they used soccer stadiums as far away as Miami and DC. Same thing is going to happen at the '24 games; they are using soccer stadiums in Marseille, Lyon, Bordeaux, St Etienne, Nice, Nantes. They will have basketball and handball in Lille. Rowing and kayak in Vaires-sur-Marne. They're even holding the surfing events in Tahiti, the french territory in the Pacific ocean.
@fod20114 ай бұрын
@@NiallMcEvoy05 Coolock
@nosignal884 ай бұрын
1000%
@harpgrewal82034 ай бұрын
They are a huge scam which leaves the host in debt for decades.
@captainAlex2584 ай бұрын
or millennia since canada barely has nothing at all, I really need to find a small town for my l.a.noire tv series
@hybridstryker2334 ай бұрын
💯💯💯
@Clippidyclappidy4 ай бұрын
On top of the fact modern Olympia is literally just Goebbels propaganda and is just rebranded eugenics. As in the same Goebbels who was propaganda minister of 1930s Germany.
@larsonfamilyhouse4 ай бұрын
And make athletes bear the burden of all the costs.
@bridgetbinion84944 ай бұрын
Plus everyone wants to kiss Russia's ass even though they are cheaters.
@mikatu4 ай бұрын
We keep avoiding the main problem. The main way cities lose money with the Games is because the IOC takes a lot of money and they spend zero! They should pay the cities to host, not charge them for the Games. In fact, the way the cities won the bids in the past was by bribing the IOC officials. When your process includes bribing something is not right.
@badkarmabaroo4 ай бұрын
Exactly. The IOC also includes stupid ass demands in their contracts with host cities: create separate lanes on all roads that will only be used by IOC personnel; the IOC commissioner must be greeted ceremonially at the tarmac (and hotel) when s/he arrives; IOC must have separate entrances to the airport. Crazy shit.
@subscribetopizzatheonlyrea73224 ай бұрын
@@badkarmabaroo ahahhaha thats bizarre
@TheAnimeist4 ай бұрын
@@badkarmabaroo The IOCC is corrupt no doubt. But who knows? Those demands may be put in place to see if the contract was read in full detail. Like what Van Halen used to do with brown M&Ms being removed from the bowl.
@z-beeblebrox4 ай бұрын
This is also why a permanent venue solution has been avoided for so long. Because that WOULD require the IOC to foot the bill in some manner.
@nutmeg2084 ай бұрын
Yeah, the Olympic Committee should change their business model to one that also raises money.
@Zezetheb3 ай бұрын
Kind of surprised Salt Lake City wasn’t brought up as an example of how to do them well. All venues that were used in the 2002 Olympics are still being used today, and are planning to be used again in the 2034 Olympics. Also, I think it’s one of the few cities that did actually benefit from that “legacy” idea. The games absolutely put Salt lake on the map, and it has since become even more of a pro sports training / competing / recreational destination.
@hanguhbur3 ай бұрын
I was wondering the same thing. I suspect it was conveniently not mentioned because it didn't fit the narrative of this video.
@getoffamylan68443 ай бұрын
I am literally going to an ISU short track event in the Olympic oval later today, and my 11 year old is currently taking speed skating classes in that same facility.
@kerstinanderson61723 ай бұрын
I was looking to see if this comment was made and glad I was not disappointed. Yeah, the SLC Olympics was purposely left off. Boo!
@dh19523 ай бұрын
Yea they purposely ignored the successes of SLC, Atlanta, Barcelona, Lake Placid, London
@SeeJay19863 ай бұрын
it seems like North American athletes have benefited the most from their winter olympic games as the venues post games end up being the perfect training facility for alpine sports. In Canada, Calgary Alberta ended up being exactly that, and just as their facilities started to get outdated, the city of Vancouver and Whistler in British-Columbia hosted the games with updated modern facilities in the latest technologies. ..Turin Italy struggled after cause of proximity competition facilities in other countries who dominate in alpine sports.
@FrancisSiuChock4 ай бұрын
Isn't it time for the corrupt IOC to start paying cities to host game?
@rosstheboss86334 ай бұрын
they don't have 25 billion dollars XD
@simonjenkins57384 ай бұрын
@@rosstheboss8633then the question we should be asking is do we even need an Olympic Games?
@Rei-xq3zm4 ай бұрын
@@simonjenkins5738alternatively, does each game ACTUALLY need to cost so much?
@saikat93ify4 ай бұрын
@@simonjenkins5738The Olympics are a wonderful opportunity for a lot of sportsmen to show case their skills in a global platform. It also inspires many people. Almost all olympians have an inspiring journey behind them. The goal of the Olympics inspires a lot of people as well. I don’t know about the economic side but it’s definitely a great event worth having.
@musyarofah14 ай бұрын
@@saikat93ify then you don't watch the video at all.
@thomascho81324 ай бұрын
There isn't a strong demand to host because while the IOC stands to make billions from broadcasting right and advertising, the cities that host them are usually left in debt.
@joelmilten4 ай бұрын
I feel like this wasn't emphasized enough. From what I've heard, too much of the money from food and merchandise sales go directly into the IOC's pockets. Not enough goes into the local economy.
@freewaynicky55694 ай бұрын
For every winner...there has to be a loser
@Monitice4 ай бұрын
@@freewaynicky5569 Every floor ... has to be made out of floor.
@KhanMann664 ай бұрын
Did people forget what happened in Rio 2016? So many new stadiums went up only to be abandoned once the games are over. A huge waste of time.
@ad-t-dude4 ай бұрын
The revenue from broadcasting rights used to be split evenly between the IOC and the organizing committees of the specific individual games. Then the IOC decided to keep ALL broadcasting revenue which is very lucrative especially in the United States. This is a major cause of their current problem finding host cities. This is even more so for the Winter Games. Now, it is my understanding, that they are sharing some of the broadcasting revenue as an incentive to get host cities.
@faerydae293 ай бұрын
In Brazil it was a disasters. Thousands were forced out of their homes in the poor areas so it could get torn down to build Olympic Venues. Now the venues sit empty. It’s extremely expensive, wasteful, and it hurts the locals! I agree with having multiple nearby countries hosting the event to be able to use exiting Venues, or just have a permanent location in Greece. Times have changed, we can all travel now.
@Jeloquence3 ай бұрын
Having one permanent location would be the best idea for several reasons. But isn't it a little of an advantage to preform in your home country? Seeing all the french supporters in the stands this year, is a big boost for the athletes to do really well. You don't want to lose in front of so many people who cheer for you. Also preforming in your own timezone and climate would be kind of an advantage, right? I think, maybe it should rotate certain cities respectfully, every continent gets one city. And maybe in Europe (because, let's be honest, it's small in the great scheme of things) it can span a couple of countries with the best facilities.
@jasewilliams143 ай бұрын
@@Jeloquence I didn't see any advantages at the Paris Olympics. All I see on social media is people complaining about events, athletes, and boycotting France or purchasing anything from there.
@myyou73353 ай бұрын
@blor3664 I don't see a problem here. Winter Olympics is done separately and they can just go to whichever country is big on snow. or Ice. . .Also they should split indoor and outdoor winter olympics if they need to.
@TheManofthecross3 ай бұрын
yep and much more. also with ww3 being a risk as it is. the games might be suspended out right.
@Damento123 ай бұрын
Greece proved it can’t financially afford the games, it should be held in countries/cities that actually could hold. Making it a rotation between London, Paris, LA/Atlanta/NY/Chicago/SF, Tokyo, Sydney/Melbourne/Brisbane, Rome, Barcelona, Beijing, Munich/Berlin, and Seoul with the occasional switch to a city that has good financial backing seems ideal at this rate.
@mogerus3 ай бұрын
Holding the Olympics in a permanent place is a practical and cost-effective idea; and holding it in Greece would be symbolic. Sports, no matter where it's held, is still a crowd drawer. Like the Superbowl and the World Cup, they can still earn revenue as long as they allow sponsors.
@RaymondHng3 ай бұрын
Greece does not have the financial resources to host every time. Also, hosting the Games in one country for every Olympic Games is in violation of the Olympic Charter.
@KatieBellino3 ай бұрын
@@RaymondHng I'd assume that if you went to a permanent venue in Greece, the IOC would have to start footing the bill for that venue. Every nation would contribute to the fund through athlete entry fees and ticket sales would go right to upkeep.
@RaymondHng3 ай бұрын
@@KatieBellino A significant portion of the broadcasting rights revenue collected by the International Olympic Committee (IOC) is allocated towards the staging of future Olympic Games. Specifically, the IOC redistributes about 90% of its revenue to support the organization of the Olympic Games, as well as the development of the Olympic Movement around the world. General breakdown of how the IOC allocates its broadcasting rights revenue: Organizing Committees for the Olympic Games (OCOGs): Approximately 50% of the revenue is provided to the host city organizing committees to cover the costs of staging the Olympic Games. (For the 2024 Paris Olympics, approximately 27% of the budget is covered by the International Olympic Committee (IOC). The IOC's total contribution to the Paris 2024 Games amounts to $1.7 billion, of which $855 million comes from revenues generated through broadcast agreements). The overall budget for organizing the Paris Olympics is primarily sourced from private sector funding, including the IOC, partnerships, ticket sales, and licensing, covering nearly all the costs of the event ) National Olympic Committees (NOCs): Around 10% is distributed to NOCs to help fund their operations and support their athletes. International Sports Federations (IFs): About 10% is allocated to the IFs to support the development of their respective sports globally. Olympic Solidarity: A portion is dedicated to Olympic Solidarity, which funds programs to support athletes and promote the Olympic values worldwide, especially in countries with fewer resources. The remaining revenue covers the operational and administrative costs of the IOC and other initiatives to promote the Olympic Movement. This revenue structure ensures that a large majority of the funds generated through broadcasting rights are reinvested into the continued success and growth of the Olympic Games and sports globally.
@bilbowilbo98493 ай бұрын
@@KatieBellino Participating nations would help fund the maintenance of all the venues if say, Athens were to be the permanent host city. Greece itself might provide the security and/or misc. costs. Agree, the IOC model needs to change. Amazes me that LA got the 28 Games with the Calif. economy in deficit.
@KatieBellino3 ай бұрын
@@bilbowilbo9849 As demonstrated in 1984, LA is a unique city because it has almost all of the facilities to host the games without building much in the way of new structures...the stadiums and colleges are numerous. A poor American economy is still easily able to provide the food and materials needed for the games.
@smurfcatcher3 ай бұрын
Love the explination that the host city is able to show itself off to the world. Yes, because nobody has ever heard of Paris France or Los Angeles California.
@YRS243 ай бұрын
lol spot on
@user-zw5jj2uf1p3 ай бұрын
In that sense it may help developing countries more. The first time I heard of Rio de Janeiro was through the 2014 World Cup
@thrusta1003 ай бұрын
Brisbane tho? Now they wanna hand em back, can’t even decide on a stadium 🏟 😮
@thebeautificationclub85783 ай бұрын
Toronto Canada has never hosted. I'd love if they did since I'm in the GTA
@Madjiul3 ай бұрын
Everyone’s heard of Paris France but it’s had a shit reputation over the last few years. So I think the decision would be somewhat to do with trying to save their international PR😂
@kirbyrules554 ай бұрын
I live "in" LA. the 1984 olympics were so sucessful that they made a fund for under privileged kids to give them really cheap tennis lessons. I used to teach those. The charge was 10 dollars for 4 1-hour lessons for 6 weeks, so 24 total lessons, group style. Now-a-days group lessons are 30 a piece or more and more than 100 an hour for a private lessons so you can understand how cheap 10 dollars is for 24 lessons. The LA 84 olympics' fund paid for the rest. This fund STILL EXISTS in 2024 and kids still get to benefit from it across LA, meaning hundreds of lessons each week.
@garfieldsmith3324 ай бұрын
That was 40 years ago. So much expense, kickbacks and corruption in the Olympics of today.
@KallyReeder4 ай бұрын
That's awesome 🎉
@H0mework4 ай бұрын
Very cool thx for sharing.
@Shark-pj8in4 ай бұрын
10 dollars is more now tho
@OscarUnrated4 ай бұрын
@@garfieldsmith332 it’s not like there wasn’t corruption in the 80s. Iran-contra affair
@NostalgiCrazy3 ай бұрын
At this point, the most practical thing is to reuse all existing venues. It's cost effective and there are plenty of cities to rotate every 2-4 years. Some comments have mentioned just having 1 or 2 permanent locations, but the people that have spent so much money, time, and labor to build all those venues deserve to see their work at future Olympics again.
@patrickorourke414 ай бұрын
I researched LA84 extensively for a project in my CA Culture class in college. It was a wild success thanks to everyone from top to bottom, especially Peter Ueberroth. There was also a MASSIVE volunteer force that helped run the games. Los Angeles refused to take a single tax dollar and funded the whole games through corporate sponsorship. The only real money spent came out of the initial fund started by Ueberroth. LA only had to build two new venues and modify a few existing ones. At the end of the games they netted over $200M in profit, and that led to the creation of the LA84 Foundation, which went on to create a ton of youth sports programs in Sourhern CA. That’s what you call a legacy👏👏👏👏
@caellencaellen19584 ай бұрын
And they were inspired by the success of the frugal Depression-era LA Games of 1932, don't forget!
@Jigamanx24 ай бұрын
Now that’s a model with pursing. Have all these money hungry corporations pay for the event. Sell it ass a more exclusive advertisement than the Super Bowl (for the US) and watch the free Olympic money roll in to do cool things for the hosts city
@kaleimaile4 ай бұрын
I hope it will be a good one again in 2028. I got to go to the Gold medal baseball game: USA vs Japan (Japan won) @ the Dodger stadium.
@steveroberts94534 ай бұрын
Apologies for Zola Budd.
@wavelength01234 ай бұрын
What about the efforts taken to clean up the streets of LA for the games to make the city "presentable" to foreign nations?
@ogog77804 ай бұрын
Almost 50 years later, Montreal is still paying for the Olympic stadium 😵💫
@EdT.-xt6yv3 ай бұрын
Ahi caramba!
@lordemelodrama42033 ай бұрын
Here in Brazil we will probably continue paying for this for at least another century.
3 ай бұрын
i LIVE IN MONTREAL QUEBEC, CANADA. WE HAD THE SUMMER OLYMPICS BACK IN 1976. WE ARE STILL PAYING FOR THEM BY THE MILLION$ EVERY YEAR. THAT IS 48 YEARS LATER. DO NOT EVEN TRY TO GET THE OLYMPICS, EVER.
@CD3MC3 ай бұрын
didn't they fully pay it off last year?
@burmesepython3933 ай бұрын
No. It was paid off 3 decades later (2006)
@jaredhuang22254 ай бұрын
LA is unique in that it already has almost every venue needed for the summer games. The only expensive things they are building are long overdue improvements to public transportation.
@dt73534 ай бұрын
Should just stay there forever.
@danielzhang19164 ай бұрын
they should limit it to LA and other former hosts, not every city is able to host such a big event
@barmybarmecide53904 ай бұрын
Hardly unique, this is the situation Paris finds itself in. Most the budget has gone into public transport links, cleaning the river and restoring historic sites. The olympic village will be social housing after the games and be a part of a larger estate later
@EdDunkle4 ай бұрын
Paris has a ton of venues and an actual river. It's probably the best site for the Olympics.
@cattysplat4 ай бұрын
LA has infinite money cheat unlike every other place in the world.
@roygoodhand13013 ай бұрын
You forgot something: Denver 1976... In a statewide referendum on 7 November 1972, Colorado voters rejected funding for the games, and for the first (and only) time a city awarded the Winter Games rejected them.
@christianvandegraaf98444 ай бұрын
Using existing venues isn't enough. Oslo wanted to bid for the 26 winter games, and was well on its way with a plan to use the existing infrastructure and venues, merely needing to build athlete housing which would be transformed into student housing later. Problem was that the IOC list of demands beyond just the sportive was leaked and it was absolutely insane. Things like wanting unobstructed car transport to each venue, 5 star hotels for executives, free helicopter transport, tropical fruits in arctic norway, meetings with the king and prime minister etc. Once that was seen, all public support for the bid evaporated.
@db50943 ай бұрын
wtf
@josepheridu33223 ай бұрын
entitlement inflation
@janejustin17883 ай бұрын
tropical fruits in Arctic Norway, meetings with the king .....wtf
@davestang54543 ай бұрын
Understand that the IOC is run by very corrupt, greedy individuals these days. The "Los Angeles 1984" plan did not take for future games because as more and more players jumped in the event and they realized more and more ways to PROFIT off the games, the original focus, the ATHLETES and the sporting competitions themselves, became secondary. I think this has been made very clear for the 2024 Paris Olympics, featuring an opening ceremony that was ridiculously extravagant.
@dfuher9683 ай бұрын
Yeah, most of the demands had nothing to do with the actual events or athletes, it was about insanely expensive coddling of the IOC members and executives. I remember the helicopter rides. Also each had to have their own luxury car with private chauffeur, an iPhone with unlimited use, 5-star hotel suites for all, luxury meeting rooms on numerous locations with a specified temperature and specified accessories right down to the fruit and snacks they demanded in every room, whether it was used or not. Just the demands to the catering of them was beyond beliefs, down to the slightest detail, that would be more expensive than the most pricey restaurant in the world. And it just kept going for 100s of pages of outrageous and expensive demands.
@WesMakowski4 ай бұрын
Hosting the Olympics is kind of like having a wedding. Statistically, the cheap ones are the most fun/memorable & the flashy/expensive ones often end in divorce...
@John-gr5tx3 ай бұрын
You tell them wes! The whole thing was started in 1900 to stop war and promote peace between countries. So far it has produced 2 world wars, several mass murderers, a dozen protests leading to riots and the divorce rate has increased 5 fold. Along with all the wars that are on the increase!
@bobsinhav3 ай бұрын
Don't get me started on the Ambani wedding?
@jessquiatchon22043 ай бұрын
Tf is this analogy? those descriptions arent mutually exclusive.
@JohnSonofSons3 ай бұрын
I don't think there's any statistical evidence of cheaper or more expensive weddings resulting in divorce. However I do believe that people don't like those with money out of jealousy, so in their mind, they'd like to believe that more expensive weddings result in divorce. Because in their mind, rich people are bad. At the base of it all, jealousy.
@rhubarbtart3 ай бұрын
Lol @@JohnSonofSons
@AntonioCDias-bh7ns3 ай бұрын
I am brasilian and it really hurts that my country spent so many with olympiads and soccer word cup while we have so many people in poverty without education or health care adequate.
@cesarin35923 ай бұрын
Yeah, i'm mexican but i remember watching all the protest on tv. I was very worry about things going mad after the end of the semifinal against germany in 2014 cause your politicians risked the economy and stability of your country just to get ,maybe, the worst humilliation of your national team in football
@Tokru863 ай бұрын
@@cesarin3592 7:1, never forget. the best football game ever :)
@AntonioCDias-bh7ns3 ай бұрын
@@cesarin3592 They SOLD the game : don't forget Neymar pretended a contusion in the mach before for get out of the shame!!!!
@MatheusFernandes-xf4zm3 ай бұрын
"agro-exportador" significa, sem desenvolvimento.
@sabrinarodrigues6293 ай бұрын
@MatheusFernandes-xf4zm English please.
@lucsanaraujo3 ай бұрын
If the idea of an Olympic permanent city goes forward, I think a good solution to keep the excitement of the Games is making local-themed editions, as if the chosen country/city becomes the event's Master of Ceremony, responsible to organize the event right there not only at the ceremonies and brand identity, but also to decorate, to make expositions, presentations, experiences, conventions, etc. around the whole city during that time; ensuring the infrastructure stuff would be exclusively organized by the IOC. It would be less expensive for a local Olympic Comitee and virtually zero costs for the public authorities, would attract countries that had never had a single chance to host (or even thought in bidding) to show their culture to the world and would leave visitors watching the event motivated to visit that country soon after ending the Games.
@cerebrummaximus37623 ай бұрын
A permanent spot for an Olympic city, but the chosen "host" country decorates it based on local traditions and landmarks? Would have been an excellent idea! ...a few years ago. You see what's happening with France and Qatar (eventhough not the Olympics). Nobody's hosting a ceremony based on their local countries traditions, rather preferring a generic splendour bombast to wow the audience than something ethnic, and when they do focus on local traditions, it goes in disaster, such as the recent scandal of France mocking their own historical figures (and also the Last Supper, though Da Vinci is Italian). You can see a similar trend with other world competitions, such as Eurovision. It would have been cool if the songs and dances were themed to each of the countries' cultures, but it's just a generic contest. Some countries have done more local-themed songs. I'm not suggesting a full folk song competition, just have the pop songs more local themed, but darn it, Russia went full on and hired folklore grandmother singers one year, and that was good - however, sadly even this is no longer plausible, with countries such as the Ireland controversy straight up mocking their own culture. It's sad.
@nicoladc893 ай бұрын
@@cerebrummaximus3762 It would be very very different if the "host" country was Botswana, which could never host an Olympics. The Olympic Games are one of the very few things that unite all of humanity, what could be more perfectly Olympic than an Olympic center built, maintained, financed by everyone? Wouldn't it be perfectly in the olympic spirit to give visibility to small nations that could never host an olympics? It would also be very interesting from a sporting point of view, always the same route for the marathon, always the same route for road cycling, always the same regatta field for sailing, the same pool for swimming, the same track for athletics. The only problem would be football, because you couldn't build 5/6/7 stadiums, but nobody gives a shit about Olympic football, it's worth less than the Europa League, they could even abolish it.
@clickbait37534 ай бұрын
My econ professor told our class how he was hired by the city of boston to consult them about the potential pros and cons of an olympic bid they were considering. He didnt give a recommendation of either going forward with the bid or not, but he said that within 48 hours they had withdrawn their bid for the olympics. That was all I needed to know lol.
@MNIU_4 ай бұрын
So he was hired to do a job and didn’t do it?
@lyyila02564 ай бұрын
@@MNIU_ Sounds like he just gave a list of pros and cons without a formal advisory recommendation either way, just that the list of cons were so bad that he didn't need to give a recommendation for them to realise it was bad
@Emileigggggh4 ай бұрын
As someone who lives in Boston, can confirm that the Olympics being here would be an absolute nightmare lol
@phoenix50544 ай бұрын
@@lyyila0256 It's a tragedy how some people don't have the ability to comprehend a paragraph-long post.
@jamesprumos77754 ай бұрын
I'm glad your professor gave an honest assessment of the bid.
@rody2k64 ай бұрын
As a Brazilian and resident of Rio , I can confirm that our Olympic legacy is bullshit. Even Maracanã stadium which was shown in this video with horrible pitch took a few years after the game to finally be stabilized. I went to the games and found it awesome but the lasting effects were and are complete crap
@murlocanonyme4 ай бұрын
I heard that the city of Rio is in debt for something like 300 years just to built the Maracanã, is it true or is it exagerated ?
@rody2k64 ай бұрын
@@murlocanonyme no no that is not true. The last management company actually owes the state of Rio money. To save the stadium they basically had to get two football clubs Flamengo and Fluminense to take over the stadium. It’s a really convoluted story but the info that you got is wrong, fortunately.
@christianbolisca14934 ай бұрын
This was happening at the same time as a massive corruption scandal with Lula and Rousseff.
@bobdrooples4 ай бұрын
The old stadium had it's rebar rotting from piss though...its an upgrade?
@rody2k64 ай бұрын
@@bobdrooples you mean Maracanã pre 2014 World Cup ?
@uncleremus644 ай бұрын
Montreal 1976 was a debacle. I visited Montreal in 2009, and on a guided tour of the Olympic village, the guide said the city was still (at that time) repaying the debt from the 1976 Olympics.
3 ай бұрын
i LIVE IN MONTREAL QUEBEC, CANADA. WE HAD THE SUMMER OLYMPICS BACK IN 1976. WE ARE STILL PAYING FOR THEM BY THE MILLION$ EVERY YEAR. THAT IS 48 YEARS LATER. DO NOT EVEN TRY TO GET THE OLYMPICS, EVER.
@KnugLidi3 ай бұрын
Thanks to the incredible corruption during the construction phase.
@TheEDFLegacy3 ай бұрын
@@KnugLidi That's pretty standard for Montreal, unfortunately
@NoName-md6fd3 ай бұрын
The thing I heard about it, was that concrete trucks would pass a border to say they were going to unload the concrete (for constuction) as to get paid by the load, but didn't unload the cargo at all. They would then pass that border 2 or 3 times and rack up the profit. Yeah, it was bad and we are stuck with the olympic stadium.
@haroldb18563 ай бұрын
The Olympic stadium in Montreal is called the Big Owe.
@dwayne53523 ай бұрын
I think rotating the Games among a list of 6 cities (one in each inhabitable continent) would be a good strategy. Every number of years, a new city might show its interest and contest a bid.
@lilyrolyat67263 ай бұрын
This is a great idea imo
@crashthevacuum3 ай бұрын
Exactly. LA for North America, Rio for South America etc. Plus Athens every 7 cycles. Have a set number of sports (don't add one without getting rid of another) also.
@dwayne53523 ай бұрын
@@crashthevacuum I agree. If the model that exists is threatening the very sustainability of the Games, then a more logical model must be embraced. I'm sure this stability would provide a lot of advantages as it relates to planning and preparation.
@lordmusea4 ай бұрын
At this point, why would any country want to host the Olympics? There’s little, if any, economic benefit to the host country. The costs are outrageous to prepare, it inconveniences the locals, and the IOC is basically a criminal racket at this point. 🤷♂️
@ChryskylodonInstitute4 ай бұрын
exactly. should not be called olympic but corruption games
@BurritoKingdom4 ай бұрын
Probably the same thing with the World Cup. Oil rich countries.
@thesenate18444 ай бұрын
@@BurritoKingdomThese days even the Olympics don't have the level of international prestige as hosting a FIFA world cup.
@sadmanh04 ай бұрын
@@BurritoKingdom it's not just the oil money that makes them want to host fancy shit, those countries all have terrible human rights record and so they try to hide it with sports washing.
@sharpasacueball4 ай бұрын
@@thesenate1844 Even the FIFA world cup is making losses too
@MandiaM274 ай бұрын
I lived my entire life in the suburb/city next to the Olympic village in Athens. There was no growth to this really bad and abandoned by everyone in power city, the village and the facilities are abandoned and people of low income are housed there with no real infrastructure for the people there (no hospitals, no after school activities for kids, little to no commercial activity). The village is linked with city nearby with only one bus line that is rarest than truffles in the wild. So there was no metro lines connecting to the city and the village for more than 200k people, no economic growth, no drops in criminal rates. On the contrary the city is sinking more and more into darkness and the criminal rates have skyrocketed
@daleviker58844 ай бұрын
Athens 2004 was a budget-style games that cost very little because of Greece's economic difficulties at the time. A year before the games there were doubts they could proceed. If no money was invested it is hardly to be wondered that there are few enduring benefits. How could there be?
@iamnormal86484 ай бұрын
*no after school activities for kids* ? C'mon ... with all that Olympics playgrounds lying around in the village.. how lazy are the kids of Athens?
@SuperDestroyerFox4 ай бұрын
Rarer than truffles in the wild is a saying I need to use now.
@chrislamp4 ай бұрын
@@iamnormal8648 If you take a look at what happened to the old stadiums from the olympics you will see why these "lazy kids" don't play. The only thing standing from that time is the olympic stadium and even that hasn't had any type of maintenance since the day it was built. I am guessing the same thing happened to the olympic village.
@70mavgr4 ай бұрын
@@daleviker5884 Athens 2004 where most definitely not budget style Olympics. The economic crisis came post 2008. Over 20 new venues where build not including the hugely expensive renovation of the Olympic stadium.
@lukemullet4 ай бұрын
Slight correction on London. They originally said there wouldn't be a football team in the stadium and would be used for athletics only. They soon realised though that it wouldn't be financially viable and practically handed the stadium to a football team just so they didn't have huge costs each year.
@MrWillyMrBrightside4 ай бұрын
To be fair, with the provision that the stadium could and would be used for other sports, that's why it's not truly a football stadium (West Ham fans dislike this)
@andrewwinslow93154 ай бұрын
@@MrWillyMrBrightside Hammers Fans are still pissed they had to leave their old Ground for this dump, while Tottenham and Arsenal got much better grounds
@MrWillyMrBrightside4 ай бұрын
@@andrewwinslow9315 To be fair, those clubs paid for those grounds out of their own money and bank loans, West Ham got a very generous deal from the taxpayer
@malahammer4 ай бұрын
The arrogance of Seb Coe and Co not building it with football as an after use. It's completely their fault.
@malahammer4 ай бұрын
@@MrWillyMrBrightside as West Ham fans say "It's ours, It's round We got it for a pound" It's still not a football stadium.
@rustygaming78813 ай бұрын
Brisbane Australia won the bid purely because NONE of the other states wanted it. The cost was considered too much. It's a total waste of resources that can be spent on the state or country
@qiyuxuan94373 ай бұрын
I think its better for Sydney to host it again rather than brisbane, since most of the stadiums in Sydney are still in use. Many new stadiums probably are needes for brisbane, and since it is a much smaller city compare to sydney, they probably have very limited usage after the olympics.
@70mavgr4 ай бұрын
We hosted the 2004 Olympics in Athens, got universal praise and left with billion euro installations rotting away with no use whatsoever. The only positives where the expedite of the metro infrastructure and the tram system.
@goodshipkaraboudjan4 ай бұрын
It's the same in Sydney. The village and venues are in the middle of no where and a constant issue.
@greywell29824 ай бұрын
@@goodshipkaraboudjan As an american, I have researched the rio and there is a issue as well.
@esmeraldagreengate43544 ай бұрын
@@goodshipkaraboudjan closing ceremony was a great party though 😁
@mikejones-go8vz4 ай бұрын
Greece should stage it every time and every competing nation should contribute. The stadia and infrastructure would be already built and used every time
@dutchuncle27164 ай бұрын
@@mikejones-go8vz Why Greece? The modern Olympics are founded by a French man, and have nothing to do with Olympic Games of Ancient Greece except for the name.
@Lagmaster334 ай бұрын
The leaked document from Norway when they pulled out from the Winter Olympics bid showed how IOC head honchos wanted to be treated like royalties. It's insane. Nothing to do with sports, just accumulating personal wealth.
@phild80954 ай бұрын
That is the purpose of power.
@dmac97774 ай бұрын
I've worked on 2 world cups and a commonwealth games and the VIPs are exclusively executives from the organising committees.
@LiezAllLiez4 ай бұрын
Wow... spending a fuckton of money on a one-time historical event produces deficits, rather than revenue? Who woulda thunk it!
@KorianHUN4 ай бұрын
But several politicians were paid huge sums under the table, totally worth it for them!
@Abluemoon91124 ай бұрын
This video is stupid lol. Countries like the USA make money off the Olympics and they also utilized the buildings after the games.
@SaintNormRIP4 ай бұрын
Atlanta actually avoided that by selling sponsorships to every event to corporations. Rare Olympics that didn’t cause a city a massive deficit. Of course the IOC hated it because the city of Atlanta benefitted and they didn’t from the corporate sponsorships.
@Abluemoon91124 ай бұрын
@@SaintNormRIP lol the only Olympic that cast a deficits are countries that can't afford to host it or use it as vanity project. The Olympics that the United States have hosted have either broke even or made a profit from. The London Olympics also were very inexpensive.
@vordman4 ай бұрын
@@Abluemoon9112 London was a very good example. There were many existing venues they could use. Wembley, Lords, O2 etc and the venues they had to build were needed anyway.
@AntiNihilist3 ай бұрын
Ah yes. Los Angelos really didn't have enough traffic lately, so it's nice to know it will have a sufficient amount in 2028.
@steamedbunnft44774 ай бұрын
Olympic Committee should stop glorifying the event so much. Stop asking for too much with too little benefits to host countries. Just keep it real.
@KorianHUN4 ай бұрын
All about corruption. These large numbers are a joke, the real money is the bribes everyone pockets and the friend and family who own the contracted companies get the rest.
@ObscureGaruda4 ай бұрын
@@steamedbunnft4477 Wtf do you think the OLYMPIC COMMITTEE should do? Shit on the Olympics? Wtf do you think their job is?
@franklinhuang4 ай бұрын
@@ObscureGarudaacknowledge the issues and account for it?
@sdiz35094 ай бұрын
@@franklinhuangcommon sense isn't so common 😂😂
@neale38714 ай бұрын
Far too many events, some are quite obscure. Host cities should choose, outside of the classic sports.
@diehardharrypotterfanz4 ай бұрын
As someone who lives in east London, I would say the 2012 Olympic Games has had a positive and lasting legacy on the communities here. From a brand new park, to lots of new housing and upgraded public transportation, the benefits have been numerous. I think London is a great example of how to hold the games and leave a positive legacy.
@alyraismanisqueen45764 ай бұрын
Yes❤
@ScarySox4 ай бұрын
@joescott5015 We all pay while London benefits, just like everything in the UK!
@AddySwann4 ай бұрын
@@ScarySox London is a net contributor. it generates more in tax than is spent on it..
@SeanusAurelius4 ай бұрын
Of course it has. The issue is that it cost Birmingham and Manchester and Essex and Brighton and Scotland and Wales and the Isle of Man millions and millions of pounds.
@OntarioTrafficMan4 ай бұрын
They are also perfectly capable of building parks, transport etc. without also building stadiums that they won't need once the Olympics are over.
@JKSSubstandard4 ай бұрын
A big problem ive always had is that the IOC doesnt take project sustainability into account when picking host cities.They keep picking cities that dont need all these new facilities and projects and investment. So it just ends up as a waste. I said for the last 2 decades that Buffalo, NY would make an amazing Olympic venue practicality wise. Make it a joint games between Buffalo and Toronto. Toronto builds a new baseball stadium they want. The Buffalo Bills get a new football stadium they want. The Sabers can get the new arena they want. University at Buffalo gets the stadium they want. And the olympic village can be built at the University at Buffalo to serve as replacements for some of their older dorm buildings after the games. And the city could use the infrustructure investment to get itself back on its feet. Thats 8 stadiums and a village right there. After the games, the existing 4 stadiums could be torn down. Nothing would be wasted at the end of the day. All the stadiums have teams waiting to occupy them afterward. The village has a tenant afterwards. But whatever, just hit LA again
@kghostthegreat4 ай бұрын
You can even build a good amount of it in Niagara Falls, which is more or less becoming a ghost town. And it literally has one of the 7 wonders of the world right there. Also not an insanely large population to work around either
@KyrilPG4 ай бұрын
* didn't take into account... They do now. Like in Paris, very very very few things were built. Even the Olympic Aquatic Center was sized for most international events but for the highest attendance requirement events that only exist for Olympic Games, like swim races. Those will be held in a major concert and sports arena with a temporary and reusable pool structure. The Olympic Aquatic Center will hold most other pool events. They've only built an athlete's village, and a media village, both to become housing within a few months after the games. (Private market, semi-social, and social housing). There's also a mid-size arena, which Paris needed for some time, that was built "for" the Olympics. But that's just a way for the city to externalize the cost of their new venue under the Olympic and privately funded budget. The city also piggybacked on the Olympics to fund their major river cleaning and sewer overflow problem solving projects. Literally everything that was really built "for" the Olympics, was either long overdue, or on Paris and-or France wishlist. So, there's zero chance of any equipment staying abandoned after the games. All the "new venues" already were used before the games for local events or serving the local population. Much like the training pool, which like the Olympic Aquatic center, were built in the district of Paris (and France) with the lowest amount of swimming pools per inhabitant.
@eb.37644 ай бұрын
@@kghostthegreatNo f__ck that. Go to Hamilton. Leave Niagara Falls the quiet place it is
@osco43114 ай бұрын
That's because the IOC doesn't care about the host city. Sustainability is the taxpayer's problem. The IOC just wants the city that offers the most benefits to them: bribes, kickback contracts, and concessions on civil rights like advertising restrictions that violate free speech.
@kghostthegreat4 ай бұрын
@@eb.3764 the American side, the Canadian side is pretty much a tourist trap already
@dacorum80533 ай бұрын
I live in London and I opposed the 2012 bid because it was too expensive and it was sold to us on a lie because the final cost was several times higher than what we were originally told it would cost. it's clear that other cities are now far more aware of the astronomical cost of hosting which is why they are dropping out.
@stevek12253 ай бұрын
The IOC should just buy an island in Greece and host the event in the same place, every Olympics
@cannibalronny73143 ай бұрын
Exactly an Olympics disneyland
@christinajoseph50293 ай бұрын
@@cannibalronny7314 ohhhhh I like these ideas, especially a Disney land type .
@donnacrabtree56113 ай бұрын
love that idea yes 👍👍👍
@mrcak23 ай бұрын
Agreed. Maybe can collaborate with 2nd country as co-host.
@Z4r4kiKenpachi3 ай бұрын
That island can be in the middle of possible battlefield.Aegean dispute has potantial to create war.
@tarik69904 ай бұрын
Hosting the Olympics is a major luxury today compared to 30-40 years ago.
@YourCanadianGuide4 ай бұрын
And then there is Canada, who managed to go in debt for 40 years to pay off the stadium in Montreal 48 years ago... Sorry
@tarik69904 ай бұрын
@@YourCanadianGuide Yes and today it would cost a thousand times more and you'd be a thousand times more in debt than you were back than in 1976.
@CastorRabbit4 ай бұрын
Like most things
@Gingermycat4 ай бұрын
@@tarik6990 what makes it ok because it was cheaper then? The Olympics are dying because people don't really care. We have bigger issues
@tarik69904 ай бұрын
@@Gingermycat It's not that it makes it ok, it's that the challenges regarding financing were different at the time. How are Olympics dying?
@carlosroura75814 ай бұрын
Being from Barcelona, it came as a shock to me when I first learned about this topic. For us, it is still said today that the Olympics of 1992 really transformed the city and put it on the map for worldwide tourism. Not only that, but most of the infrastructure and venues are still used today. Almost all the venues here have been repurposed for hosting various contests, events & festivals (like a copy of the Oktoberfest or a copy of the Feria de Abril), fashion events & galas, other sports competitions, lots of concerts and shows (like Cirque du Soleil and many musical artists), comic-cons, congresses (some are used for the Mobile World Congress for instance), a yearly children festival and a yearly youth employment & studies guidance & job fair, and some are even open to the public permanently as sports facilities or museums I don´t know if Barcelona´s model was exceptionally well maintained through time or what, but it really was a blessing for the city. Nowadays though, I´m not so sure it would be again, probably not
@memovilmx62394 ай бұрын
Barcelona has a lot of stuff. Actual summer, a shitton of culture related venues, magnificent architecture. The Olympics were a booster? Perhaps but definitely not what brought Barcelona to the world's eyes.
@SomeoneFromBeijing4 ай бұрын
Been to Barcelona and I can confirm it. That shopping centre shown in the video used to be a stadium. It is really cool. Beijing did something very similar. The gigantic swimming venue is now a water park. New metro lines are used by residents to get to places. And despite what the video says, the main stadium is still hosting football matches, concerts, and many other events. The football team he mentioned never planned to move into the stadium, the video was wrong about it. I remember living in Beijing during that period. The city really transformed. And I enjoyed the Olympics.
@estebanod4 ай бұрын
It’s harder when you’re already in a big city
@sporeafan4 ай бұрын
I'd say it's a bit special case as Barcelona is just lucky, being already well known tourist destination before, and being able to combine a well sized city, with the sea and incredible soft power of Spanish and Catalan cultures
@belamoure4 ай бұрын
Today Barcelonese pistol water their tourists so that they can leave them alone .
@TheMacacoco3 ай бұрын
One of the success stories not mentioned is Barcelona. Its hosting led to increased international interest in Gaudi architecture which raised Barcelona's profile as a tourist destination.
@gemmeldrakes27583 ай бұрын
And now there are so many tourists that Barcelona has protests against tourism.
@angel_of_rust3 ай бұрын
@@gemmeldrakes2758 whoopsie
@mooreanonumbers3 ай бұрын
Barcelona 92 lead to increased international interest in Dr Fuentes❤
@mervzd3 ай бұрын
Thanks to the original Dream Team.
@brucejunior18133 ай бұрын
Even the Olympic villa in Rio is almost still empty to this day. Only a few of the buildings have people living in.
@loercayt61463 ай бұрын
Is it dangerous tho?
@Velvet743 ай бұрын
Hopefullly since most of the buildings in Paris and LA are already existing it will be better from now on.
@freebolt59133 ай бұрын
I would rather we never host the Olympics again, dont care what other country's do or dont do.
@ketianma28104 ай бұрын
I am Beijing resident and I want to correct one thing. The national stadium in Beijing consistently holds all kinds of huge events like concerts, improvised parks, etc. I just went to a huge concert there several months ago and it was one of my most cherised memories. I'm not sure whether it paid off economically but it's definitely not "sitting there mostly empty".
@pinkitydinkity65504 ай бұрын
Yes we also toured there as part of our architecture class and it’s pretty common
@viron67344 ай бұрын
Thanks for the information. So many KZbin videos are poorly researched, like this one.
@MaQuGo1194 ай бұрын
50 Cents were added to your CCP Bank account, plus 10 Good citizen points.
@sbakst4 ай бұрын
@@MaQuGo119go and touch grass
@FrcNeru4 ай бұрын
@@MaQuGo119 5 yuan, cents are a imperialist construct
@paulclarke75714 ай бұрын
I'm a Canadian. The 1976 Olympics in Montreal ran way over budget as after the terrorist's attacks in 1972 games, the security budget ballooned to $1.1 billion. That's 5.35 billion in 2024 dollars.
@RandomDude-t8b4 ай бұрын
Entertainment as a whole is a economical waste, instead of using it to cure cancer or sustainability of the earth.
@cynthiajohnston4244 ай бұрын
Remember the '72 Olympics well as Olympic equestrian Kathy Kusner returned to her home in Maryland & rode for the barn where I worked . Much more occurred surrounding the Munich attacks , both before & after , that never reached the media ! 😪
@HelloMattMat4 ай бұрын
Interesting to learn about '76 as a fellow Canadian. My understanding is that the 2010 Winter Games in Vancouver were considered highly successful, and I believe profitable, as Canad learned much of their lessons from previously hosting in '76 and '88.
@wendysnelgrove58704 ай бұрын
@@HelloMattMat Calgary was also a pretty successful games and that infrastructure is well used. I don't mind if we host another winter games, but I hope we don't host another summer games as I think the cost just isn't worth it.
@lamou17083 ай бұрын
It took more than 30 years to repay the debt of The olympic stadium in montreal by tax payers. In the end, an extra sales tax was added to tobacco to finish paying it all. I remember thanking some smokers for helping repaying that debt as a joke
@garystrahan46013 ай бұрын
It's interesting that this popped up in my feed, considering I boycotted watching the Olympics since 1990 when Atlanta was awarded the games and came to the conclusion that the whole process was corrupted and costing taxpayers of the losing bidding countries millions of dollars.
@Emmanuel_Rocha3 ай бұрын
Same, I don't even bother to watch them anymore. People are taking way too long to realize the Olympic games are just a scam.
@Masterraccoon-np3kl3 ай бұрын
@@Emmanuel_RochaWith how horrible this 2024 Olympics game is? Not really. The number is increasing. Rapidly.
@MrGrandBarbu4 ай бұрын
as a quebecers, i heard for decades that we've still been paying for the interest of the montreal 76's olympics debts. and the cost on maintaining still adds up
@AIMAGICSTREAM3 ай бұрын
Omg.
@RoboJules4 ай бұрын
Sometimes those costs are a good thing if they're spent well. With Vancouver, everything we built was designed to be used by the public years after the Olympics. The Canada Line is an extremely successful transit line linking the Airport and Richmond to Downtown, which currently serves 150k riders a day. The Sea to Sky highway upgrades are very well appreciated and has allowed Squamish to become a major satellite city. All of the local Olympic venues were turned into really nice community centers that are currently so crowded that the city needs to start building more. The Olympic village has become a vibrant transit oriented waterfront community. The point I'm making is that the infrastructure being built cannot be single use, but must be designed to build and grow the city itself. Vancouver used the Olympics as an excuse to build important infrastructure instead of the other way around.
@enterpriset4 ай бұрын
I was very curious why Vancouver wasn't mentioned once. It was far from perfect but I guess it didn't fit the storyline?
@TheMowgus4 ай бұрын
My thoughts exactly. The Richmond Oval (the speed skating venue) was designed to be a multi-purpose facility and locals are able to use it and host events like basketball. It all comes down to the people doing the planning; it's not an Olympics problem.
@Pscribbled4 ай бұрын
Yeah Vancouver did an awesome job with the infrastructure improvements. Although I wonder if maybe the problems seen happens more with summer Olympics as Id assume they would need more permanent facilities that would inevitably end up as “white elephants”
@danielzhang19164 ай бұрын
@@tek1645 back then, a lot of cities thought it would bring a lot of tourists if they built a lot, but they later realized that it was only temporary, so the new venues went to waste or were torn down
@janicechau54824 ай бұрын
Vancouver 2010 was probably one of the few Olympics success stories and doesn't fit the narrative of the video. It left a lasting legacy but it was sustainable, the city definitely optimized and still uses all the infrastructure that was built. It was 100% the right decision to host it in Van, and honestly it could probably be done again successfully a second time.
@gregorylu4 ай бұрын
What about a rotation with “anchor cities” as where the Olympics returns to regularly, but still gives room for other cities to make bids when they feel like they have the budget? For example, in the golf majors (except the Masters), each have “anchor sites” which the major returns to every 7-8 years. St. Andrews for the Open, Pebble Beach, Marion, Oakmont among others for the US Open. But other old and historic courses also can make an appearance every once in a while. This process allows two things: 1) it makes it so anchor sites don’t need to spend as much money to build infrastructure, and we can use already successful cities to do so, such as LA. 2) it still gives us the ability to experience the wow factor when a new city hosts. Further, there’s the added benefit where if a country that regularly hosts the Olympics has an issue, whether through domestic turmoil or crimes against humanity, the IOC can effectively suspend that country until they fix their issues, then reinstate them into the rotation. Sites can also serve as emergency backups in case no new country desires to bid on a future Games, or if a site has some massive issue that may prevent them from hosting/completing their infrastructure in time.
@danflaman72684 ай бұрын
Or you rotate the hosting between 5 distinct cities, and the facilities in all of the cities between Olympic years are available for participants to train at at a reduced cost to their home country. in effect you get a training facility that's globally local for athletes in that area to train at that should be an Olympic level venue, and the participating countries can use it with reduced costs for their athletes because they are already paying money to the IOC.
@ikester84 ай бұрын
I like that idea. It's still worldwide, and nearby cities in the country can host some events without breaking the bank.
@caellencaellen19584 ай бұрын
This would be a superb plan for the struggling Commonwealth Games...
@Lilitha114 ай бұрын
I like that idea but I am not sure it would work due to how long it is between each event. If you only rotate between the same 3 cities that is every 12 years. A white elephant isn't really worth it, if the games only come to you every 12 years, and that was using an extremely small number of cities.
@droid2D2C3P04 ай бұрын
Similar concept to the world juniors. Canada hosts it every other year and on off years the rest of the world rotates. Canada has a ton of infrastructure for hockey plus a high concentration of fans to fill the stadiums making it easy to host every other year, but still allows other countries a turn on off years
@sayuas42933 ай бұрын
I am from Amsterdam. I really really do not want the olympics to ever come here. If they try, I will protest against it and sign petitions and whatever
@nurnadhirahsaing61693 ай бұрын
From my obsevation, the Olympics is just not worth it compared to Fifa World Cup. Maybe because it just focus on one sport while the Olympics have many sports in it therefore people/fans will flocked over to sports that are more popular? (Idk, I might be wrong).
@sayuas42933 ай бұрын
@@nurnadhirahsaing6169 i also dont want a world cup and whatever other world sporting events. Amsterdam is already full of tourists all year, every year and it causes many problems. We don't need more.
@FulhamXHansa3 ай бұрын
@@sayuas4293I fly to Paris every year and its never been so quit on the Streets becuase the Tourists didn't come becuase of the prices and most people That live in Paris leaved the City
@sayuas42933 ай бұрын
@@FulhamXHansa yeah everyone dislikes it basically
@AllMenMustServe3 ай бұрын
@@nurnadhirahsaing6169 Hosting a football event is a lot easier and less costier to host than the Olympics. Just look at Germany this year with the Euros. They had all the infrastructures already. They invested close to nothing. It's just logistics and that's easy because they're already used to it every weekend. Not to mention the fact that a World Cup/Euros is organized by the whole country, not just by a single city. You can use all the infrastructures you have at your dispose in your territory, regardless of where it is located. As opposed to Olympics, where you need all the venues at a specific location.
@mradamp1254 ай бұрын
Boston was down to be a re-occurring destination. We have DOZENS of high-quality universities with wonderful facilities that agreed to participate as Olympic hosts. BUT the IOC demanded new venues erected for the event. Wicked stupid. We told them to take a hike.
@vordman4 ай бұрын
Good for you. But have a heart for those poor IOC officials denied their backhanders under the table from the construction companies.
@kelvinpell45713 ай бұрын
But you are also governed by democrat party fascists
@rungfang273 ай бұрын
I imagine you saying wicked stupid in a Boston accent. While Ben afflick dances to the dunkings in the back ground!
@mradamp1253 ай бұрын
@@rungfang27 accurate
@normadgarmez70263 ай бұрын
Sounds to me that Boston gave the IOC a lot of benefits on a silver platter to host the games. I mean that's what they need to be profitable and hosting a city is one of them. But nope, it's not enough and ask that those countries especially the citizens flip the whole bill.
@MrSilverDude1014 ай бұрын
There's really only one city I've heard of that loved hosting the Olympics, it was Salt Lake in the 2002 winter ganes. It was very similar to the LA model, but new infrastructure was built. The difference is that all that new infrastructure is still in use. Students still stay in the Olympic Village when they attend the University of Utah. The difference is SLC was a growing city as opposed to an established one. Would be hard ro replicate in another city, but not an imposible one.
@caio59874 ай бұрын
London loved it too back in 2012
@XMysticHerox4 ай бұрын
@@caio5987 The long-term effects of the London olympics is a big part of why cities dropped out this time.
@imtired16964 ай бұрын
I hear Salt Lake City is going to host winter games again too?
@maxpowr904 ай бұрын
Why Salt Lake is so happy to have a "new" NHL team. They're gonna build a new arena for the team (and the Utah Jazz) so they will definitely be ready for the 2030 or 2034. I imagine Stockholm is the other winning bid.
@FffFff-jd2lo4 ай бұрын
@@XMysticHerox i thought london olympics were successful?
@sandrajohnson42333 ай бұрын
i never understood why they have to focus on a city rather than a country or state. It would make it less congested and there would be more venues available.
@felix-gj4ut3 ай бұрын
i think the main problem would be that the olympics dont work like forexample a world cup. Games/Events tend be made out of much more smaller events, with an incredible amount of different sports, often happpig somewhat simultaniosly, which makes trying to see more than one event incredibly difficult if its happens to be at the other end the country, meaning you either dont get to see it/or have to travel a lot.
@donnacrabtree56113 ай бұрын
yea like the football world cup and the euros, many stadiums in the whole country ... would be a much better way to do it 👍
@j-lon35643 ай бұрын
It’s simple, really. Olympic sports don’t really have that much of an appeal for the general public. Imagine having to travel to a random city in the middle of Brazil, that you’ve never heard of, to watch Pole Vault? You simply wouldn’t go. Now, if all of the events are in the same city, you end up attending “random” events because you’re already there.
@donnacrabtree56113 ай бұрын
@@j-lon3564 well they could split the crap sports that no one wants to watch and include them at the various venues with the good stuff people do want to watch, or alternatively just ditch the crappy ones no one wants to watch anyway ... just as easy ... Also just to note, many people travelled to and from different cities / venues for the recent euros football in Germany and it was an excellent vibe everywhere 👍👍
@j-lon35643 ай бұрын
@@donnacrabtree5611 the whole point of the Olympics is to compete in a bunch of sports that wouldn’t have a spotlight otherwise, ditching them would ruin the event. About the euros, of course people travelled around lol, it’s football, the most watched sport in the planet and it was with most of the biggest and most well-known national teams. The Olympics is different, you can’t expect people to travel to random places to watch random events, it wouldn’t work. About bundling the events together, they already do that. All of the athletics stuff is held in the same venues(running, long jump, pole vault, etc.). The country-wide Olympics is a good idea only in small countries, like France, Portugal, Spain, etc. if that were to happen in the US, Russia, Brazil, China, Canada, etc. it would be a complete flop because people just wouldn’t attend the sports that are held in lesser known areas. Try to imagine yourself going to the outskirts of Arkansas in the US, or to a random city in the countryside of China, to watch archery, you simply wouldn’t go because there’s nothing attractive about the sport or the place. In contrast, if the Olympics is held in New York City, for example, and you get tickets for archery, you would attend, because you could go sightseeing across the city and visit tourist attractions and you would get the “feeling” of the Olympics as everyone is bundled together there to watch the Olympics as a whole.
@TedTrinity3 ай бұрын
It's not worth the money. Splitting it up by individual sport by category and have cities bid on each sport. Specializing on individual sports would improve everything overall and less overwhelming. Something needs to change
@AAblade74 ай бұрын
I’m kind of surprised the 96 Olympics wasn’t mentioned that much as well. I know the IOC hated it, but that was because of how little control they had over it. The major sponsors had much more say due to Atlanta using mostly private funding for the games. IOC really cracked down on sponsorships after that one.
@belamoure4 ай бұрын
IOC hated Atlanta 1996 because Atlanta was so bright and lit about not being screwed by them. I was there in 1996 and I really saw how a city can control IOC's pirates.
@nachobroryan88244 ай бұрын
Eric Rudolph is an example of why people wouldn't want what happened in Atlanta.
@70mavgr4 ай бұрын
The 1996 Olympics where bought by Coca Cola.
@colej12064 ай бұрын
Surprised by this as well, guess it goes against the narrative of the video. A lot of facilities were reused after the Olympics a good example being the Ga Tech North Ave dorms which were built originally to house athletes.
@Xiuhtec4 ай бұрын
Atlanta used them as an excuse to perform much needed upgrades on their interstate highways through downtown as well, traffic improved for many years following.
@rchilde13 ай бұрын
One thing you forgot to mention or expand upon, is that for the LA 2028 Olympic Games not all of them will be held in LA or even the S Cal region. Two events, Softball and Canoe Slohlam will be held in Oklahoma City; a city that already has world class venues for the two sports; which will significantly save LA28 and the Olympics. In fact, OKC also has a very straight course along its river that could also be used for rowing events - that hasn't been announced but it could. This just reiterates the acceptance of the Olympics being a multi-city effort where possible, while also shining a bit of light for lesser known cities or those would couldn't do it on their own such as Oklahoma City, to also shine and share in the rewards of being an Olympic city.
@mircopaul52593 ай бұрын
Still need to build toilets for all the gender fluid people
@GilBangalan3 ай бұрын
The idea of having the Olympics as a "multi-city effort" is worth considering. I would go beyond by suggesting to have the Olympics in a "multi-region" event. Some games maybe held in the cities of several regions - USA, South America, Asia, Middle East, Africa, etc. The cities will not have to accumulate debts just to hold the events - and use the money for the people who needs help.
@davestang54543 ай бұрын
Technically speaking, a "city" doesn't host the games. It's organized by the national Olympic committee so it would be normal for some events in the Los Angeles 2028 Olympics to be held in other American cities. They try to keep most events in a tight geographical area but that's not always practical. Team events, especially, might employ multiple venues.
@aclark9033 ай бұрын
@@davestang5454Hope LA reigns back the Pride shit, but I won’t hold my breath.
@SnowmanTF23 ай бұрын
That only got announced a few weeks ago, even if there had been rumors for months at least the Canoe Slalom was for over a year, some chance the video was already shot and in editing by that point.
@marscaleb3 ай бұрын
What honestly surprises me the most is... How soon before the Olympics the IOC picks a city. I thought this was planned out far further in advance than this.
@elainelindsey13063 ай бұрын
It used to be done 7 years in advance. I remember watching the bid for 2004 Olympics which aired live on TV in 1997. Dunno maybe the system changed recently.
@RaymondHng3 ай бұрын
@@elainelindsey1306 The International Olympic Committee (IOC) typically awards the hosting rights for the Summer and Winter Olympics about 7 to 11 years in advance. This long lead time allows the host city to prepare the necessary infrastructure, facilities, and logistics to accommodate the event. For example: The 2024 Summer Olympics were awarded to Paris in 2017, giving Paris 7 years to prepare. The 2028 Summer Olympics were awarded to Los Angeles in 2017 as well, giving Los Angeles 11 years to prepare. The 2026 Winter Olympics were awarded to Milan-Cortina in 2019, providing a 7-year preparation period.
@btf_flotsam4783 ай бұрын
Brisbane was picked a decade in advance.
@WickedNightingale3 ай бұрын
Brisbane was picked 3 years ago and they have not done one single scrap of work towards implementation. they haven't even written word on of a plan to implement. It is going to be an absolute disaster - LA will end up hosting two in a row,
@nicoladc893 ай бұрын
Well, at today we know the host cities of Olympics up to Salt Lake City 2034. Paris and Los Angeles were chosen in 2017, 7 and 11 years in advance. Milano-Corina was chosen in 2019, 7 years in advance. The French alps and Salt Lake City in 2024, 6 and 10 years in advance. Brisbane in 2021, 11 years in advance. The idea of hosting the Olympics in a single city, having to build facilities from scratch that will then be dismantled, when there are already sports facilities everywhere, is a stupidity of biblical level. Paris was a little less stupid this year by hosting tennis on the courts of Roland Garros, sailing in Marseille and surfing in Tahiti, but then they spent 2 billion to make the athletes swim in a river that hasn't been swimmable for over 100 years. It seems that in 2030 they want to hold the skating competitions in the Turin 2006 facility (something that the idiots who organize Milan-Cortina refuse to do). For Milan-Cortina they cleared dozens of hectares (in an area that is a UNESCO World Heritage Site) to make a sledding track that no one will use anymore, when they could have gone to Innsbruck which is a few kilometers away. You want to host the Olympics in a single city? Why not always the same city? All the NOCs and Olympic countries contribute according to their capabilities and all together build an Olympic center where the Olympics are always held. The opening and closing ceremonies are assigned to a nation, which can then make itself known to the world even if it is not one of the rich nations, the facilities will be used in the future. The money earned is reinvested in the maintenance of the Olympic sites. And that's it.
@johnpk58313 ай бұрын
It costs too much to run the games and bribe the IOC. Then there's all the headaches before, during and after the games for the host city.
@An00bisY00tubis4 ай бұрын
I’m from Brisbane and am not looking forward to paying for the Olympics with tax
@ChrisSmith-bh2hg4 ай бұрын
You hosted the Commonwealth Games. You already paid to build much of the necessary infrastructure.
@Scottagram4 ай бұрын
I'm not overly pleased about Brisbane hosting the games but I softened on the idea. New selection rules state that 80% of the infrastructure has to already exist or be funded before the Olympic bid, specifically to prevent empty stadiums. New rules also let the event spread out more instead of being in one stupidly big mega-venue. Gabba total reconstruction has been demoted to a regular refurbishment and new stadium proposal has also been shot down.
@jimjimson62083 ай бұрын
@@Scottagram Thank god
@matthewbain63063 ай бұрын
@@ChrisSmith-bh2hg You would think so, but no, already huge arguments about the amount to be spent and where the main stadium would be. The commonwealth games were actually on the Gold Coast and although some venues will be reused most will be in Brisbane .
@MercifulEmma3 ай бұрын
If Brisbane is anything like Sydney the infrastructure and venues created will still be used years to come if that is any consolidation.
@Daoibhéar4 ай бұрын
I'm surprised Qatar, Saudi Arabia or the UAE haven't been selected to host an Olympics. They'll spend about $1T on a sporting event easily
@olliemcdowell45034 ай бұрын
Because then it’d have to be in Qatar, Saudi Arabia or UAE LOL
@abstort95934 ай бұрын
@@olliemcdowell4503 yea like didn't doha already get under fire for hosting FIFA since it's a very homophobic country (or something along those lines, i don't fully remember the situation)? i doubt it would fly for qatar to host the olympics in today's climate, and for good reason
@shagunthapliyal73094 ай бұрын
Qatar and Saudi Already got the 2030 and 2034 Asian Games with Saudi even making an new city for the asian winter games and obviously the 2034 World Cup
@lol-ih1tl4 ай бұрын
@@abstort9593 the FIFA World Cup 2022 boycott was because of the unspeakable working conditions of the construction workers.
@Hex4Trex4 ай бұрын
I'm not - I suspect that has always been considered very controversial
@Bobrogers994 ай бұрын
One topic just touched upon is that there are so many "sports" that have been added to the Olympics, and they all require an often-specialized venue. That adds to the overall costs of being a host city.
@donkeysaurusrex78814 ай бұрын
Most don’t “require” a specialized venue. The IOC simply requires separate buildings. No reason, you couldn’t hold many of indoor sports that have small competition areas such as the fighting sports and weightlifting in one building divided into multiple areas.
@etienne81104 ай бұрын
@@donkeysaurusrex7881even if not specific, more sports means more venues used at the same time. So more venues (which won t have much use afterwards), means more spendings. And returns aren t following.
@Calemdoscope-uq1yg4 ай бұрын
Not to mention how pandemic-time olimmpics turned into politcal speech platform for "underrepresented group" ( the one that demands letting men into women lockerrooms ).
@richiericher90844 ай бұрын
Additionally, many of the "new" sports can manage with temporary infrastructure. Take 3x3 basketball, the last world cup was hosted on a temporary court in the middle of Vienna. Similar things go for speed climbing or BMX.
@tk80mufa54 ай бұрын
I would argue the sports program itself should get cut down to the big 3 in terms of audience interest : - *Athletics* ( but only Sprinting really , everything else is outdated like Shot Put , Javelin & Discus & Hammer throw , Pole Vault , Long & Triple & High Jump , Marathon , Decathlon , Race Walk , etc. ) - *Aquatics* ( but only swimming as in races , no Diving , no Water Polo , no Artistic synchronized , no Marathon ) - *Gymnastics* ( but get rid of the Vault & Trampoline ) the only "new" sport i am okay with is *Climbing* , since over the last 20 (?) years in Western countries it has gained an enormous following / active scene. Combat Sports (inluding Fencing , Boxing , Wrestling , Judo , Taekwondo , Karate , etc.) to me are quite primitive , and should all get canceled. same with Equestrian & Modern Pentathlon. animal rights have evolved. Cycling & Triathlon is for morons only. now on to the team sports : since FIFA actively sabotages the Olympic football tournament - get rid of it. same with the low audience interest sports like Field Hockey , Team Handball & Rugby. also get rid of Tennis ( the Slams are more prestigious than the Olympics) , Badminton , Table Tennis , 3x3 Basketball & Beach Volleyball , Canoeing , Rowing , Sailing , Surfing , Skateboarding , Breaking & Golf , Archery & Weightlifting . the only team sports I would keep are *Basketball* & *Volleyball* ( since FIFA is actively gonna sabotage Futsal if it were to be included ). So , in my book , that would be *6* (!!!) sports , and only really three types of venues need to be built - a indoor running track ( no more than 20,000 capacity ) - an indoor swimming pool ( no more than 10,000 capacity) - several multi-purpose indoor arenas for Gymnastics , Climbing , Basketball & Volleyball ( again , no more than 10 - 20,000 capacity ) I want to also add , that the Olympics should be extended AT LEAST to *4* (!!!) weeks , not two ! If you are going to have an event like this , at least let the people enjoy it for a full month !!! ( like the FIFA World Cup ) there i did it , saved billions of Dollars/Euros/Pounds and hundreds of boring sports tv hours.
@luciennedespota9093 ай бұрын
A permanent location makes total sense. Although the Paris Olympics were beautiful and well organized, getting from one event to another became a real hassle on certain days. The opening ceremony was a five minute walk from my hotel. Due to security issues, and Metro train problems, I ended up needing to take three different trains back to my hotel. I had to show my Pass Jeux six times just to get onto the block of the hotel. There were huge lines at train stations and at the different events. Eliminating the need for public transportation and utilizing buses and vans which move people from one event to another without traversing huge swaths of a metropolitan area would be cheaper, easier and eliminate the need for the military and police to be stationed on every street.
@cv49814 ай бұрын
From what I gather the only real recent successful Olympics was the 2012 London Olympics, due to the absolutely massive focus on makign sure the facilities built for the Olympics would serve a purpose after. From what I know almost every single permanent build for the Olympics (stadiums, accommodation, the Olympic village) still exist today and are in use.
@rafhurffer78844 ай бұрын
I'm a live in London and can confirm this. The main stadium is now a weekly sold out premier league stadium, the arena is home aof Londons basketball team, the aquatics is just an awesome public pool etc. The best part is the area where they built the olympic park was pretty dodgy and now I think I see mkre new builds there than anywhere else still to this day
@FlashyVic4 ай бұрын
@@rafhurffer7884The stadium very nearly wasn't as the London Olympic committee insisted the Olympic stadium design be specific for athletics and not fit for easy conversion for football after the games. Even though there was never ever going to be any demand for a large arena for athletics in the UK. It was only afterwards when reality bit and with some dubious dealing and a lot of taxpayer money wasted that West Ham moved into the stadium - against the wishes of the majority of their support. And it's renowned in football supporter circles for its bad sightlines, poor atmosphere and distance of pitch from many of the seats.
@jasonstevens20604 ай бұрын
Pretty sure Vancouver and Lillehammer for the winter Olympics were considered successful also
@CtrlAltDelete0074 ай бұрын
The Vancouver 2010 winter Olympics are one of the most successful in the history of the Olympics. Vancouver still utilizes pretty much every single venue and infrastructure upgrade they did in preparation for the games. They also didn't lose money like most Olympics.
@bennwaters58514 ай бұрын
Sydney was more sucessful than London.
@Dnn4113 ай бұрын
What financially responsible and sane country would disagree? Today, a city wanting to host the Olympics is just a politician’s Vanity Project. Overall, hosting is a huge security risk, financial RISK and environmental disaster.
@indigocheetah41723 ай бұрын
Exactly, the politicians in Brisbane made the bid for 2032. We unfortunately won the bid.
@chdreturns3 ай бұрын
@@indigocheetah4172Say what would happen if a city refuses to pay afterwards?
@xituma3 ай бұрын
@@indigocheetah4172exactly, and the construction, not just for the arenas and stadium but the road infrastructures have began everywhere and pretty much hired out 80% of all trades persons. Thus making the housing crisis even greater with rising interest rates and inflation. New home buyers and investors are having a hard time finding tradies to build houses or even renovate it to sell.
@night67243 ай бұрын
If the world operated in your way there’d be no art or beauty and everything would be utilitarian
@tournamentmaster20003 ай бұрын
@@indigocheetah4172 I believe there was only one bid, which is why it won.
@bubbabear2444 ай бұрын
The Big Owe in Montreal for the 1976 Olympics didn't pay off their debt on the Stade Olympique until 2004. It's not being used regularly as the Als and CFM play elsewhere where they don't need a 65k seat venue.
@123mathtutorabc44 ай бұрын
lol, the CFM play right next door and the Als prefer an 100 year stadium to the Big Owe, oh yeah they are going to spend another $870 million to replace the roof again...
@krisppynugget4 ай бұрын
At the very least they still use or have repurposed some of the old sports vicinities (the aquatic center is still in use today, for example, and the biodome was converted from the '76 velodrome), but the Big O itself is a white elephant, the whole thing has and always will be an exorbitant money drainer.
@lanceschmidt30474 ай бұрын
A bit of trivia - it was also the first games where the host country didn’t win a gold medal.
@genebohannon88204 ай бұрын
Champlain Islander here and the Big O has been a laughing stock my whole life. I saw an exposure game in 1980 and it wasn't finished then and the place was empty
@123mathtutorabc44 ай бұрын
MONSTER SPECTACULAR!!!!!!!!!!
@diegosilang48233 ай бұрын
In Vancouver, all Olympic facilities are still in use, but the Provincial and Feds had not fully recovered the cost. The winner are the real estate investors who inflated property cost and making it unaffordable to average people.
@MaxPayne9093 ай бұрын
9:04 The part of hosting the Olympics can hurt the image of the city is so true. I never want to visit Paris after all the negative things that were brought to light during the Olympics this year.
@skidmoda3 ай бұрын
ditto, after the sexual deviant stuff they make it seem like a pedo and groomer world capital.
@evelynalvarez48973 ай бұрын
Can you give any example of this negative things?
@clarity21153 ай бұрын
Paris is a dump... outside of their architecture
@qcthesxientist3 ай бұрын
@@evelynalvarez4897 tourists from my country have been getting raped
@ebtsolstice3 ай бұрын
@@evelynalvarez4897 Can you come up with a positive thing about paris?
@WarioSaysSo4 ай бұрын
Actually, does each Olympic Games ACTUALLY need to cost so much? It really don't need to have so much extra costs, incl. luxuary hotels, luxuary built stadiums etc-etc. Its about the competitions, NOT luxuary things. In the old past it was never these insane prices because they kept things more modest.
@jakovcu4 ай бұрын
Well the number of Olympic sports is increasing so number of facilities has to grow and so the cost.
@dty12074 ай бұрын
@@jakovcuthat’s irrelevant to what they posted.
@oriena_4 ай бұрын
@@jakovcu This doesn't explain the need for hotels that cost $500/per night per person
@jakovcu4 ай бұрын
@oriena_ I don't think that some hotels are built for Olympics, in grand scheme of things I don't think that increased price for some hotels for few people (athletes will stay in Olympic village) makes huge difference.
@Wfalen4 ай бұрын
They cost a lot per night because there's so much demand. No one is building new hotels for a two week sports event. Actually when you look at the athletes rooms they are usually pretty spartan. The venues themselves and transportation are the ones that cost.
@Rverma304 ай бұрын
You didnt touch on the $1Bn question - will cities still want to bid anymore given the ratings for Olympics are dropping like a rock. No viewers = less tv revenue = why are we putting on such a big show at all?
@bernardpolicarpio6513 ай бұрын
If The world market in general would still be interested. Same reason why hotdog eating contests and jerks playing computer games have their own olympics. Only a few percent of humanity wants to still be fit..
@dranzacspartan80023 ай бұрын
The Olympics should be held in Greece, permanently. The country is already geared up for millions of tourist a year, and its freeways are spectacular, with vehicles travelling at 160kph. They could run all the traditional events in Sparta (Javelin, Discuss, Archery, etc); they could run the water events between one of the 2000 islands of Greece; they could run the cycling/vehicle events at Mount Olympus; and they could run all the track events on the original Olympic Stadium in Old Olympus.
@Belomoh63 ай бұрын
Agreed
@carmenl1633 ай бұрын
That's not possible. Those are UNESCO World Heritage sites. They are historical and cultural legacy and cannot be put in jeopardy of destroying them.
@iljagaimovic91663 ай бұрын
And who will pay for the game? Greece
@dranzacspartan80023 ай бұрын
@@iljagaimovic9166 The Olympic Committee. It doesn't require Rocket Science, mate.
@dranzacspartan80023 ай бұрын
@@jbrock8596 You really need to comprehend, mate. Think. Just think. IF you have it a one location, preferably Greece, then EVERY COUNTRY has to pitch in and the OC is the International committee to work that out. Forget Rocket Science with you, mate ... just grab a 3rd Grader to explain this to you!
@jackbarham4 ай бұрын
London has done well, in the long term, since the Olympics. Maybe not in the cold, hard $$$ value returns on what was spent, but entire areas in East London (mainly Stratford and Hackney Wick) have developed considerably as great places to live and visit. All the facilities are still there, with the main arena now a football team stadium, and the original athletes' villages have expanded into more homes morphed into small towns. However, the regeneration of the entire area has been significant, and it is still developing 14 years later.
@Hex4Trex4 ай бұрын
I lived in the area where the London Olympics regenerated it, and I feel overall the legacy regeneration was successful and the area is thriving. The only thing it didn't really deliver well on was enough truly affordable housing for residents such as key workers, so there is an element of investors taking up property or 'gentrification'. But the public areas and green spaces that everyone can enjoy has done the area fantastic along with sporting, arts and entertainment facilities, restaurants, local shops, offices etc. But it did require commitments and ongoing investment to make the legacy work.
@etienne81104 ай бұрын
The games were used as a convenient excuse for gentryfication.
@smfreeze4 ай бұрын
They done gentrified Stratford 😢
@TemptressTeelia4 ай бұрын
I live in Stratford, and I disagree to a certain extent. Due to the building of the stadium, they demolished many flats in that area. Which was were homeless and drug addicts squatted. Now I ain’t advocating squatting. But when the buildings left, the tent city that appeared in the Stratford mall was atrocious. Still now, as I live across the tracks, on the non Westfield side, we have so much drug addicts and homelessness around. We have homelessness living in bushes next to schools. I’ve have seen people streak in FRONT of schools, as they propped their tents right behind a playground. I’ve had people stab each other right on my doorstep before 8am! So whilst the olympics rejuvenated the area of E20, E15 has felt the negatives of it. I will say though, we have used the park unlike the other hosts. So that’s a good thing tbh.
@keithhallam11554 ай бұрын
How is shipping the basketball stadium from London 2012 to Rio creating a legacy for east London? In an area of high unemployment an overwhelmingly white labour force was imported to build the Olympic venues, accompanied by white racist thugs wearing 'Olympic security' coats terrorising the local community. How does a community worker explain to young people that the biggest building site in Europe was within sight of their homes, yet minimal local people were employed in this site? Basketball is associated with black players (especially at the highest level) yet no basketball stadium remained in the Olympic site after the (money making) games had finished.
@Hex4Trex3 ай бұрын
@@TemptressTeelia Yes, it's a problem that has always needed to be addressed and this council has never managed to do so properly. I think it's better getting rid of those flats than hiding the problems in those flats which were a state. They were squatting nearby buildings where I lived (E15 too) but they were still out in the neighbourhood, it took an incident for them to finally knock them down, yes they are still about but the police have more visibility, in our area it started getting a little better. A few of my friends even came to live here. I think the most of the Olympic legacy very well utilised though, but yes, more should have been put back to E15.
@Mystipaoniz4 ай бұрын
8:31 "It puts your city on the map...." Yeah because nobody ever heard of Paris, Los Angeles, Beijing.... I wonder how does that makes an argument. It's not like the olympics are hosted in a small village, that actually needs to be put on the map.
@CarlosD3744 ай бұрын
That's more of a recent trend though. The Olympics did help some cities in becoming more prominent, such as Seoul which in 1988 wasn't the world leading metropoli it's today. Something similar happened to Barcelona in 1992, which of course was always well known and fairly important on a world scale, but it did help Spain get back on the world stage in the aftermath of its decades long dictatorship. Also, Atlanta isn't really a city that's known outside of the US; similar to Brisbane which will be the 2032 host. This is also a problem that mostly applies to the Summer Olympics, as many not-so-worldwide-popular cities have also hosted the Winter Olympics, such as: Pyeongchang, Sochi, Lillehammer, Nagano, Sarajevo, etc.
@worawatli89524 ай бұрын
Imagine Sealand holding Olympic.
@high-captain-BaLrog4 ай бұрын
Typical KZbin intellectual
@neilbiggs13534 ай бұрын
@@CarlosD374 I remember the discussion happening specifically around Birmingham or Manchester bids for the Olympics in England. UKA were told that they'd only consider bids from capital cities (which raises odd questions in the UK with technically 4 capitals, Belfast, Cardiff and Edinburgh in addition to London)
@Mark.G4754 ай бұрын
😂 funny
@tankeater4 ай бұрын
The Olympics need to just be in 1 location... With the amount of venues needed, it would just make sense to have a premier location.
@davestang54543 ай бұрын
Don't really agree but I would like to see the games rotated among a short list of locations.
@tankeater3 ай бұрын
@@davestang5454 I could see that, but any more than 3 locations would be at least 16 year gaps and the cost to keep those buildings up wouldn't be a liable option... 1, 2, or 3 locations with premium venues is what the Olympics needs.
@dfuher9683 ай бұрын
That was the original idea, why its a city hosting, not a country. But practically it was impossible. No 1 city could have all the facilities for all sports events, fx, that would mean, that no landlocked city could ever be considered, coz what about the sailing events? Plus, financially its so insanely expensive, it has to be a countrywide effort. Tho I had to admit, I did a double take, when I found out, that the 2024 Paris (read: French) Olympics would be holding the surfing contests on Tahiti on the other side of the world. It does seem insane to be so far away, tho I see their argument, that they wanted all French territories involved, and Tahiti does have some of the best wave. And considering how here just a few days in most of the sailing events have had to be cancelled due to a lack of wind, maybe they shouldve held all ocean involved event over there!
@tankeater3 ай бұрын
@@dfuher968 you need to think about the amount of events they've added along with the entire world represented having more rounds/heats. Along with the video presentation needed 2 centuries later and the simple logistics needed 128 years later. Los Angeles better do good in 2028, because I honestly think that's one of the best spots to do it. With LA and OC, there's so much infrastructure to house the tourists and an enormous International Airport. California just needs to stop going so far to the left, it's crippling this state with their policies. O yah, in SoCal, we have The Wedge in Newport Beach. They usually start to get big this time of year, but they're only 2 feet today, so, I can't blame them for that choice... Honestly, surfers are uh different breed. Doesn't it sound rad to have the top of the top contest with nothing but your fans, friends, comp, and like minded people. 🤷♂️🤘
@solehsolehsoleh3 ай бұрын
They can build a new city in Greece only for the Olympics.
@marcusjborg3 ай бұрын
My first visit to Search Party. Very impressive. Interesting, well-referenced and nicely presented. Looking forward to watching the older episodes.
@jamaarbrundidge13954 ай бұрын
Atlanta has repurposed many facilities from the 1996 Olympics. My kids learned to swim in Olympic-size pools in the inner city of Atlanta.
@kimyeung53074 ай бұрын
Worst Olympic Games ever (Atlanta)
@williamwolf28444 ай бұрын
But almost always this reuse and repurposing of Olympic venues is horribly cost inefficient. Absolutely massive amounts of money are spent on making a small number of gold-plated venues. And then after the Olympics, they are used far below capacity for things like what you mentioned. A much better way to do this would be to have not had the Olympics and to take only 10% of the total money spent on the Olympics and actually invest that for sports facilities throughout the city, especially in low income areas.
@donnyslader90254 ай бұрын
And the Atlanta games were bought - not won fair and square.
@tk80mufa54 ай бұрын
@@williamwolf2844 agreed ! great comment !
@johndodd68434 ай бұрын
The exception was also the most criticized: Atlanta. Atlanta made a profit and its legacy projects have mostly been used (the Olympic stadium became Turner Field, home of the Braves. It's now Georgia States football stadium and hosts the high school semifinals)
@nlpnt4 ай бұрын
One of many problems was the draconian restrictions on local businesses the IOC insisted on to protect their sponsors (international corporations); one that was well-publicized in 2012 around the London games was that local chip shops within a certain radius of a venue were forbidden from selling...chips. Fries, that is, because McDonalds had exclusive rights. "Fish and chips" was allowed as a heritage food but no selling fried potatoes on their own or as a side to anything else. Apparently a lot of fried fish was thrown out...
@TheRealScooterGuy4 ай бұрын
Had not heard about those restrictions before. I don't think that would fly in the US, but maybe someone knows otherwise. I could see restrictions in the venues or on sidewalk vendors, of course, but the IOC has no authority to restrict the products sold by existing businesses. If the cities tried to make such restrictions, the businesses would tie them up in court until well-after the event.
@tk80mufa54 ай бұрын
@@TheRealScooterGuy nah you should read up on these Swiss IOC FIFA UEFA contracts and the clauses they put in them , whichever country kneels down to their demands gets the games , countries that don't simply go empty handed. they even put something in regarding suspending lawsuits during the duration of the event , and guaranteeing legal "consistency" or something. don't forget , after the event is done , the money goes back to Switzerland , a non-signatory country to most US & EU contracts / supranational courts.
@j-lon35643 ай бұрын
Im from Rio and besides the public transportation improvement(only in very specific areas), the Olympics were more of a detriment than a benefit for the city. The Olympic venues are mostly left unused and are just a huge public cost. Of all the venues built(this means excluding the ones that were already there before, like the Olympic stadium Nilton Santos), only 1.5 are used nowadays. One of them being repurposed for shows and other events like the UFC, the Jeunesse Arena, and 0.5 being the actual Olympic city(where all the venues are located) that is used for the Rock in Rio events. The Olympic city used to be used for other shows, but because it’s located so close to residential areas, the government has made it illegal to host other events there. The other venues are all left unused. The tennis courts built for the Olympics aren’t even used for the Rio Open events. The cycling arena is abandoned and only serves the purpose of wasting electricity as it needs to be kept at a constant temperature. The Olympic pool is either empty or completely abandoned. I could go on and on. The only real benefits were the BRT(express bus system), that was expanded and improved, and the subway system.
@marcr75834 ай бұрын
the corruption part has been left out: these events are excellent for money laundry - that's why they're so incredible expensive. there's a ski jump in a more recent winter games event that cost about the same as the complete games in Montreal.
@SauROnmiKE4 ай бұрын
As a Greek, the lasting effects of our corrupt Games are still felt to this day. It was awesome to be a part of them, but it hurt the country a lot.
@derekh45114 ай бұрын
Munich Olympic Park still makes money, every year, and is a stunning place to visit. There's always something happening there, sports, concerts, carnivals, all kinds of stuff.
@tk80mufa54 ай бұрын
@derekh4511 not really , both the Munich & Berlin Olympic Parks are costing taxpayers millions every year in maintenance , and that for decades now. the few events are nice , but don't bring in anywhere near the exorbitant costs. Munich alone is scheduled to undergo the third (?!) renovation of its super complicated roof structure , they are talking about the possibility of 280 Mio. € !!! -- just for a roof renovation !!!
@howl_with_the_wolves4 ай бұрын
That's because the Germans are great people that know what the hell they're doing. Where is the rest of the places that host the Olympics? They're all corrupt with politicians that are even more corrupt
@Usercute-fx6uq4 ай бұрын
This might be different for the winter games. I’m from Salt Lake and we still use every venue we built from our games for local sports, college teams, youth programs, and athlete olympic training.
@fullmooney5613 ай бұрын
Vancouver is very similar, everything is being used in all seasons.
@CD3MC3 ай бұрын
Same with Calgary. It's legitimately only the bobsled track that's no longer in use (formerly the busiest such track globally), and that's only because the refrigeration system kicked the bucket a few years ago, and they can't find the funds to fix it. :(
@JohnSonofSons3 ай бұрын
They may be getting used. But Youth programs, local sports, and college teams aren't paying off billions of dollar of investment. They'll bring in a small fraction of revenue to actually pay it off.
@glacialis33293 ай бұрын
@@fullmooney561Vancouver is one of the rare scenarios where the host city broke even on the games with a profit of $1.9 million. And then there’s the economic benefit to the rest of the region in tourism during the games. I think it shows that you can run the games effectively and provide a massive benefit to the region both in infrastructure and economic growth without the need to spend billions and billions. Vancouver cost $6.4B to run (including transportation upgrades), while Korea in 2018 cost twice that (not to mention Russia at $51B)
@Kektor3 ай бұрын
Keep the venue fixed, but allow different countries to take the responsibility of hosting. Like Keep the venues in Greece but let somewhere like Canada be the official sponsors. Find different ways to bring your country's flair without it being in your country.
@e-moshe4 ай бұрын
I’m in Brisbane and there’s already infighting going on around the 2032 Olympics. For example they wanted to demolish the Gabba stadium, which was still perfectly good for a white elephant. There is however already the world class Suncorp stadium relatively nearby. Thankfully, it seems that has been canned. Oh, and there was also the underhanded way they wanted to expand the Belmont shooting range by razing parts of the natural forest right next to it. Thankfully someone noticed and it was blocked.
@kholdstare904 ай бұрын
Really doesn't help the blatantly corrupted John Coates gloating about getting another games under his tenure as president of the AOC by breaking rules and entirely behind closed doors. Then there were protests shortly after the announcement, then "don't use existing infrastructure, build new stuff", "if we go over budget a different city will pay" combined with "basically every single calculation says any point of benefit flew by $800 million ago and we're just barely 1/3 of the way into the budget". Hell, March there were talks about backing out of the whole ordeal and the subsequent federal inquiry really did not paint a good picture.
@BooksRebound4 ай бұрын
Barcelona, Toronto and New York being nowhere near their actual location on the map is really sending me 😂
@aromaticsnail4 ай бұрын
Because a photo and video editors aren't the right tools to create maps. I also noticed and it's annoying as a map maker, considering the channel is all about Geography and Geopolitics (and sports). There are plugins that they could use with Photoshop to make accurate maps, if they really want to use such software.
@BooksRebound4 ай бұрын
@@aromaticsnail But they could have just manually placed the dots in the right location. It's easy to adjust their position. Then again most people won't know, or maybe it was just a trap to make us pendants comment. People are transparent lol. A friend of mine codes and when he runs into problems, he asks reddit. Nobody would answer until he started logging in on a second account and answering his own question with an answer so egregiously wrong that people were compelled to respond lmao. We're predictable af. But yeah, they marked around around Murcia, Washington and Sudbury which is funny
@esgee38294 ай бұрын
it's probably because the train he was on when making the graphic was amtrak and VERRRRRRRY SHAKEY. i inferred this because i watched half the ad read.
@gamechip064 ай бұрын
Guys chill it's ok it's funny and it's not the important part if it was about the cities themselves then yeah that's reasonable but they're just mentioned here
@anongecko4 ай бұрын
The red dots are the city locations, not the white dots
@MikeBenko4 ай бұрын
I think having Greece as a permanent venue makes the most sense historically, economically, environmentally. It's the birthplace of the idea, it is a country that is accustomed to handling large volumes of visitors, it has a diverse cultural and environmental offer, it can invest into building out the necessary infrastructure knowing it will be a recurring event etc.
@falconeshield4 ай бұрын
Imagine if the games took place in Greece for the past 20 years. The venues would've become legendary.
@turtlefrog3694 ай бұрын
greece does not have a diverse culture, its a white country, period.
@BuyBBStonk3 ай бұрын
Summer = Athens Winter = Switzerland.
@alyeanna3 ай бұрын
Doing sports in the Summer in Greece is brutal. Temperatures are extremely high and are only going to get higher. Right now it is 35°C in Athens (95F). You can't perform at the highest level in these conditions.
@jhh7643 ай бұрын
@@alyeannaThat's pretty much the summer temps in most places
@Camilla_Kudrin3 ай бұрын
Winter: Stalingrad, Russia 💀💀💀
@Masterraccoon-np3kl3 ай бұрын
@@alyeannaThat’s not brutal. That’s literally Michigan summer weather.😭 I mean, I’ve heard the Mediterranean weather is really temperate. But 95f is not, “brutal,” bro…
@nevn3v3 ай бұрын
Summer = Quenia xD Winter = Siberia
@NationalParksArtist4 ай бұрын
Just rotate between, like, LA, Beijing or Tokyo, London/Paris, and Sydney/Brisbane. Pick 4-5 cities that have everything in place and each city hosts every 20-24 years.
@SenileOtaku4 ай бұрын
Exactly what I've thought. Although you probably wouldn't want the rotation more than 20 years. But a rotation schedule would let the games have diverse locations, and the intervening time allows the hosting cities do whatever maintenance & upgrades needed. They would have the expectation of recouping costs, which the current system doesn't. It's like Worldcon (World Science Fiction Convention). You'd be amazed at how many times Boston (NESFA primarily) has hosted Worldcon. Meanwhile NYC hasn't had a Worlcon since I think the 1960's (I had been on a bid committee for a NYC-centric Worldcon, which we had to drop when one of the hotels we would have used sold off it's function space).
@lanapapas4 ай бұрын
I lime that😊
@74_pelicans4 ай бұрын
Melbourne is better than both Sydney and Brisbane with its infrastructure, although why it needs to be one city. Melbourne hosted events in 2000 so why cant it be shared.
@sharpasacueball4 ай бұрын
Tokyo was a disaster
@jorgeortega68064 ай бұрын
@@sharpasacueball but because of covid
@davidbrown3864 ай бұрын
The reality is most Olympics are not cost effective. LA with Sofi and the Clippers Arena, to go to with the LA Coliseum and the rest will be fine. But most Cities cannot afford them.
@Erik_The_Viking4 ай бұрын
Denver CO has originally won the 1976 Olympics but they decided to withdraw in 1972, so it went to Innsbruck Austria. Smart move on their part. The costs have skyrocketed out of control, IOC demands, politics, financial issues, and much more. LA in 1984 was one of the best Olympics ever and the fact they pulled a profit was incredible at the time.
@nicko59454 ай бұрын
SLC proved it can be done and turn a profit. It’s why Denver actually tried to bid on the Olympics again but they lost to a second bid from SLC. SLC will now be hosting again in 2034 and will turn yet another profit.
@InTeCredo4 ай бұрын
Same with Munich that lucked out with all of its facilities still in use to this day, including Olympic Village that had been converted to the private residential homes and student housing.
@Erik_The_Viking4 ай бұрын
@@InTeCredo Munich definitely lucked out, which is more than you can say about other locations.
@MJCLAXDEN4 ай бұрын
@@nicko5945 Actually, that's not true. Denver had some (very Left leaning) business leaders and politicians who wanted it. LITERALLY, nobody else wanted it.
@nicko59454 ай бұрын
@@MJCLAXDEN actually it is true. Never said the people wanted it, only that Denver put in a bid with the USOC against SLC and SLC won the vote.
@JosephWilliamPelobello2 ай бұрын
Summer - Los Angeles Winter - Switzerland and Austria
@aj12183 ай бұрын
Bill Schmidt was a bronze medal olymian during the Munich Olympics. After his Olympic glory he became an early adopter of sports marketing. He was one of the planners for the Worlds Fair that was in Knoxville Tennessee. That event was profitable and he was invited to become a lead planner for the LA games in 1984. He helped make it profitable. Then became one of the lead marketers for Gatorade and transformed that company. He is a fantastic man that is always behind the scenes in these discussions
@checkanr1383 ай бұрын
oh he made kids drink sugary drinks that lead to diabetes, by suggesting that athletes (they just use a gatorade labeled bottle with non sugary drinks inside) drink gatorade. well done. diabetes for the win.
@PC-tan3 ай бұрын
@@checkanr138I remember hearing just how many cavities these Olympians seem to have as well. Because of that stuff. Also I just watched Idiocracy and in that word Gatorade is an evil company that basically made everyone get rid of water. So I'm sure that years after him that people were finally able to put two and two together.
@RalstigRacing3 ай бұрын
@@checkanr138Older Gatorade was different than the sugary water we have now.
@checkanr1383 ай бұрын
@@RalstigRacing i am fully aware how gatorade came to be what it is today. the actual formula developed at florida university that was not tasting good is what is still what athletes use (they dont use the sugary bs that is sold by gatorade or other "sport drink" companies, simply put just some minerals and electrolytes. but the stuff you get in stores is full of sugar and not healthy at all. There are 34 g of sugar (8 teaspoons) in one 20 US fluid ounces (590 ml) bottle of regular Gatorade.
@maxafc46954 ай бұрын
I think it would have been good to touch more on London 2012. This was omitted from the video because it was a success. What did they do right that others didn't and how can that be replicated in the future. The redevelopment of Stratford and the olympic park are a fantastic legacy from the games.
@wanderer10k4 ай бұрын
It really helps when you have prime real estate that needs development anyway (zone 3 is fairly central). Massive transport hub. Plus London had sports venues that were aging and could do with replacement.
@SpeculativeConjecture4 ай бұрын
Just made a whole angry comment about this exact point, the 2012 olympics was so well planned and the legacy was excellent. The fact it was not mentioned by the two in the video as potential permenant host was crazy to me, the UK would probably be the best permenant host of the games without doubt, we play and/or host pretty much every sport which features in the games amongst others that previously have and have so many amazing facilities not only in London. Genuinly the games being perminantly hosted in the UK could even potentially expand the scope of the games and feature much more in depth tournaments for certain sports such as Football, Hockey, Rugby etc.
@maxafc46954 ай бұрын
@@SpeculativeConjecture I really hope the games don't go to a permanent host, it would really take away their magic. There are enough places that have hosted them in the past that it shouldn't require tens of billions of investment in new facilities every time now
@MrWillyMrBrightside4 ай бұрын
London has established itself as a go-to emergency backup host. This was on the cards in 2014 during Brazil's political crisis with uncertainty over Rio could host the Games. The London Stadium is designed as a multipurpose venue and can be reconfigured very quickly from football to athletics, the Copper Box and the acquatics centre are still there, the 02 Arena is still used all the time, and there are other major sports facilities such as velodromes, acquatics centres, rowing places, indoor arenas all over the UK. The UK/Irish bid for UEFA Euro 2028 only involves two new stadiums, one being entirely funded by the club due to move into the new stadium anyway.
@neeljavia29654 ай бұрын
@@SpeculativeConjecture You guys can easily add cricket to Olympics without having graveyard like pitches as seen jn USA in the recently concluded worldcup. LA 28 would be no different.
@danvano94824 ай бұрын
I did a research paper when I was in University regarding a future economic plan for the Olympics to be successful. My plan was for a city to host 3-4 Olympic Cycles soa 12 Year contract with the IOC. This allows full utilization and maintenance of Olympic venues and actually would become a home for Olympic Athletes as a world renowned training facility.
@astralpowerr3 ай бұрын
What? So 1 city/country hoards the event for 12yrs??
@danvano94823 ай бұрын
@@astralpowerr yeah essentially, really make use of the insfrastructure. A chance to for the city to make changes and improve on from previous years. Develop a world class olympic program for sports that could develop the next set of olympic athletes
@houtansadeghi3 ай бұрын
@@danvano9482interesting idea. At least you looked at the figures. Well done. It looks to me as if the Olympic committee wants to see new construction to take place whereas cities like as much existing facilities as possible. That was all to get the bid now the situation is different nobody wants to host.
@AkitaMix3 ай бұрын
Nice idea.
@setlerking3 ай бұрын
The IOC has also overlooked a bunch of cities that would’ve worked great who did bid while picking exotic, flashy cities with little to no infrastructure to actually host like Rio
@inodesnet4 ай бұрын
As a Sydney resident who attended the games, it is well known that the economic benefits were strongely felt for over 20 years. The stadium still holds the record for the largest Olympic stadium (Melbourne 1956 was the second largest). But it was reconfigured to be smaller after the games. Sydney gained a new airport train line and an Olympics line that is regularly are from well before to now. The Olympic village was designed to be converted to homes after the Oympics and is a thriving suburb today. The venues are very frequently used today. The Olympic area was a derelict wasteland but it and surrounding areas are among the most densily populated areas of Sydney today. The economic benefits included a change to have Sydney still be today, the primary city for UHNWI (ultra high net worth individiual) migration. If there was anything that the city gained that it may not have wanted, it was a massive increase in population and wealth leading it to become one of the most overpriced real estate markets in the world. Sydney's success is why Brisbane has been desperate to host the Olympics for so long. It's following LA in 2034.
@tk80mufa54 ай бұрын
and yet the recent news out of Brisbane have not been great regarding 2032
@daleviker58844 ай бұрын
I lived in Sydney in 2000 and still fondly remember those Games. The only people who vilify the event are the joyless types that vilify everybody and everything.
@SonOfAsgard-ku4kd4 ай бұрын
I'm from Atlanta and I can tell you that the 96 Olympics put Atlanta on the MAP!!!! The City took off after the Olympics and has never look back!
@n7y8c74 ай бұрын
Exactly! Not to mention, Olympic venues are still in use today. The Olympic Village are dorms for Georgia Tech, Georgia State uses Turner Field, and Centennial Olympic Park has generated billions in spinoff development like the Georgia Aquarium.
@ulizez894 ай бұрын
The IOC learned nothing from their greek history, they sinned of hubris and now they are here.
@falconeshield4 ай бұрын
Everything is a sin for you guys
@theultimatereductionist75924 ай бұрын
I'm sinning right now all over my ...
@someguy-k2h4 ай бұрын
A lot of talk about how to make your city more desirable to the IOC, but not one word of the bribery, bid-rigging, and kick-backs that have plagued the committee for decades.