Why Quantum Physics Says There's a Multiverse

[@StarTalkPlus]

From a full episode, titled 'Cosmic Queries - The Deep, Par II': kzbin.info/www/bejne/sGGXiaprhJ2Ln7csi=lvcKf6zKa_J-2HwR

[@Jesse_R]

This is a shit post video..😂😅😊 sorry neil..❤

[@cloudzero2049]

I have a question that I've never heard asked before. We believe that black holes have a Schwarzschild radius, but would that mean that whatever center the universe began at also had a Schwarzschild radius? Would that even matter?

[@michaelfercik3691]

Neil, read my book, The Art of Dowsing - Separating Science from Superstition ($14.95), by Michael Fercik

[@barbarianzg8826]

Neil? In order to answer to this q you'll need to take psyhodelic substancesor you want me to give you short answer

[@Reportbots]

Lose the stupid fuckin music. I came to hear the lesson, no the dumb fucking music in the background, like it's suppose to make me feel something? WTF would be the purpose, other than to annoy? LOSE THE FUCKING MUSIC.

[@et1965]

When I was 10 years old, I was very interested in Cosmology and spent a lot of time thinking about it. One afternoon I was standing in my mothers kitchen and I noticed some drops of water on the kitchen bench. I wondered to myself, what if everything we knew about existed inside one of those many drops of water. I imagined each drop of water as representing a universe. Looking at the drops sepetated on the bench, I wondered about the possibility for an unlimited number of universes existing in an infinite void seperated my unimaginable distances. Now that I am 58, I enjoy hearing sceince slowly supporting the notion.

[@manodeepkumar1393]

May you long live to know more about this❤

[@arthurb6200]

Horton hears a Who

[@et1965]

@@arthurb6200 I don't know what this is meant to mean.

[@arthurb6200]

@@et1965 it’s a book by Dr Seuss. Also an animated film

[@arthurb6200]

@@et1965 en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horton_Hears_a_Who!

[@ndowroccus4168]

There’s something about watching chuck & Neil that just doesn’t feel wrong. Kudos

[@timterrell8678]

This is the most mind bending episode yet.

[@silvercloud1641]

Also mind bending is as fast as light travels, it can't escape a black hole. Light is the fastest known* thing in the universe, yet can be reversed or trapped? And time gets warped too.

[@travz21]

@@silvercloud1641 Light is slow af on a grand scale. It would take roughly 90 BILLION years for it travel across the current observable universe. It takes years just to reach the nearest star to us. Yet it only takes about 0.2 seconds to travel around the Earth.

[@GuruChaithanya]

Chuck's acting skills peaked. He already know all these concepts but acts as if he heard it for the first time and blown his mind 😂

[@pharaoh2537]

Yeah he may not be a full-blown doctor. PhD but he is definitely a science researcher at this point..... You can't be around all of these brilliant scientists and doctors and not know something after all these years.. but his paycheck is in entertainment so he got to keep it gone😂😂😂😂

[@onkabetsebopape7338]

It's supposed to be interactive for those of us who don't know.

[@Voodoofairy88]

Honestly some of Chuck's "acting" is probably his ADHD. That problem we tend to have with "object permanence" doesn't just happen with physical items. It happens with people, emotions, & yes even knowledge, especially when that knowledge involves our "special interest" but we are limited in who we can discuss that special topic with. I'd almost bet any time Chuck has had to go deal with other commitments, the first hour of their conversations are just both of them info dumping on each other, talking over each other & about 3-6 different topics at the same time until they get to anything that looks like a normal conversation between 2 neurotypical people about 1 topic.

[@drakewinwest9888]

Probably true , likely because he surrounds himself with info

[@oii0712]

I have heard it before but it excites me you learn to not be buzzkill 😅 maybe

[@luvotheoduntsu708]

I want both essays😭😂 "On Being Round"-Neil Tyson and "On Being On the Ground"-Mike Tyson🤣

[@TheDennys21]

"Everybody has a plan until they get punched in the face."

[@Chakaaaa]

😂😂

[@ericbrown1101]

As a weather guy I loved the last bit. My synoptic meteorology professor refused to accept 50% chance of anything as a forecast. You had to do either 40% or 60%. He also couldn't stand the use of the word "forcing" that you hear a lot in meteorology to describe basically the mechanisms of weather. He taught us it's a meaningless word that doesn't actually say anything about what's really going on. I share those 2 pet peeves to this day.

[@Serfo_]

Is it me or Chuck sounds more and more like a real scientist for times? No wonder, since he's been leveling up all this years with Neal AND he's pretty smart, on top of that.

[@kevinfisher466]

chuck is still just a dumb comedian and an evil urban orangutan.

[@ronin4991]

the topics aside, really nice editing, especially at around 6:15 or so 🙏🏻🌌

[@davidevans3227]

glad i started watching, not just listening! 🙂 x

[@exert2020]

'Sothing' is actually a great word. Do we just have to use it a lot for it to become officially recognised?

[@slowly-but-eventually]

That's how it works, yes. You know what to do 😎

[@JeremyEllwood]

7:44 - When they say 50% chance of rain in weather models, it usually means 50% of the area (usually a county by county basis) will get rain. Aviation has drilled this into my head.

[@ndowroccus4168]

Correct….but it still holds up…..for the joke.

[@jackielinde7568]

Funny, when I hear a meteorologist say there's a 50% chance of rain, it usually means the east valley and the sun cities areas are going to get drowned and I might be lucky enough to get spat on by a passer-by. But such is the experience living in Phoenix.

[@matteopera3479]

@JeremyEllwood actually it means that 50% of the initial conditions used in the mathematical model have brought about a result in which there's rain. If you repeat the resolution of the differential equations that describe the weather enough times with different initial conditions, in 50% of the cases you'll get rain. It has nothing to do with geographical areas.

[@JeremyEllwood]

@@matteopera3479 Huh... not according to the meteorologists (2) I spoke with at a STEM pilots and aviation conference a couple years back - as well as follow up conversations with other CFIs. I'm not discounting what you're saying... just stating my source of reference.

[@gligormitkovski9536]

Not correct. There is a thing called model ensemble. For example 10 different models, of which 3 give deterministically rain at a certain spot, at a certain time. Now the other 7 models don't give rain. So, that's 30% chance of rain,

[@goseals6]

2:08 - This overlap comment make me think about the phenomena of Deja Vu. So, if there is a multiverse, wouldn't deja vu be a byproduct of conciousness overlap experienced through quantum entaglement?

[@beyondcreamsoda]

3:42 - Chuck: "Say my name!"

[@neilbeni7744]

I died 10 months ago of a brain tumour, you just happen to be in the universe which I survived.. lol.

[@kamikazeftw]

Rip Neil Beni n°5673

[@Young-ep8ik]

You are understating it. There’s a version of you that died 5 seconds ago, 1 seconds ago, 2 seconds into the future etc

[@bsherman8236]

I feel like i should be gone but somehow i'm still here for some reason

[@lilskronklbloop]

fr i almost choked on a coin then almost drowned them almost got run over and i’m still here but the other mes weren’t lucky

[@CosilHeiir]

​@@Young-ep8ik man, why this dude's multiverse variants just gotta die all the time, is the multiverse out for him or what

[@busyrand]

Fantastic explaination... This stuff is fun to think about...

[@aoifedeborha2420]

Oxford Dictionary, special request to add “sothing” to the English language

[@SiqueScarface]

It would be soothing, wouldn't it?

[@TheSouthernSiren]

Let's officially nominate Chuck's new word "SOTHING" as the official StarTalk geek quantum codeword meaning nothing & something all at the same time.❤😆

[@stillwater5053]

This episode is soo good, Chuck was on point too.

[@nilo70]

Cheers From your newest subscriber from California 😎 (startalk sent me)

[@nancyhernandez2271]

This was my favorite episode ever

[@sir_squonks_alot_castro4438]

8:20 it’s not a percentage of chance with the weather. When you see the 50% that means 50% of that area will have rain or 30% and so on

[@QuantumNeutrinos]

Don't try to outsmart an astrophysicist 😂

[@MikeHol225]

It's the same thing if you think about it

[@stewartdillard7199]

Was looking for this comment

[@AncientAli3n777]

That is not what it means at all. That's how you interpret it.

[@lukassmida4885]

@@MikeHol225 Yeah it's the same.

[@markthomas8680]

About the multiverse... I do believe there is a multiverse but I don't believe there are other versions of us. For example if my grandfather meets my grandmother at a fair, what if in another universe he doesn't end up at the fair and they never get together. Then my whole family will cease to exist. And you can go back years with different decisions. Therefore every multiverse has different people on those words that we don't know.

[@babyrazor6887]

true story: Back in the 70's I dropped a hit of LSD and went to visit my friends Dave and Kathy. As we were talking, out of curiosity, I was trying yo see how long I could stretch/elongate my index finger. It appeared to me, in my altered state, that my finger appeared to extend to about 8 inches long. Then I stopped and my finger returned to it's normal size. Thinking this was a an hallucination I looked up to see Dave and Kathy looking at me with their jaws dropped. The Dave spoke up "How'd you do that?" To my shock they had also watched my finger grow. "Wait you saw that too????" I asked. To validate the experience I suggested an experiment I placed my fist at the end of a bureau with my finger pointing to one of a drawers knobs. I thought that if I really had made my finger grow then it should move closer to the knob and the distance between them will be reduced. So once again I tried to make my index finger grow. We all watched as once again my finger grew HOWEVER the finger did not get any closer to the knob. The only conclusion we could reach was the the illusion as caused by a bubble in reality. The distance between the finger and the knob were now distorted due to the surface of a reality bubble, a curvature, like a bubble, in the space my finger occupied.

[@douglasssloan7530]

Maybe you all were high at the time? Yeah, I'm going with that explanation.

[@sabinrawr]

Why would we expect the laws of physics to be different in another universe, especially if they are embedded in the same higher-dimensional space?

[@lombardo141]

Because the universe does not have to follow any rules.

[@sabinrawr]

@@lombardo141 You answered a slightly different question. Your answer makes sense if I'd asked something about how they COULD be different, but that's not what I asked. I am wondering why we SHOULD expect them to be different. As far as I know, there is no affirmative reason to think that they would be different other than the fact that we don't know either way. For me, the default assumption would be that, if our universe is embedded in some higher-dimensional space, the physics of universes born within that space should be the same. Of course, there may be other mechanisms in play, but we don't know about any of those, either.

[@verticalyetti1266]

nah I think they would be the same or similar, because of the quantum easer experiment that was done in 1999,

[@LexSwindlez]

I asked the same thing when he said it !! Like where did that rule come from or am I missing something, thank god I don’t feel alone on that 😅

[@aoifedeborha2420]

The 50% chance of rain hit home 💀

[@maplion]

The 50% chance means that in the cell that they calculated in -- usually 2-25 km^2 (they are usually pretty large areas due to the complexity of calculations and depend on the cubical cell sizes used for the air parcel calculations) -- will have rain over 50% of the area of that cell -- not 50% chance of rain at all. If you're in a city, there is likely a cell or grid that covers the whole city in the calculation and that if there is a 50% chance of rain, then rain is 100% expected to fall on 50% of that grid area. Hope that clarifies things.

[@aoifedeborha2420]

@@maplion Thank you so much!!! I always thought it was the CHANCE of rain, I was really confused 😅 thanks for the explanation, now my life makes sense XD

[@vicuppal]

Meteorologists are well aware of this and many of them will change that 50% to a 51% or 49%

[@RottenMuLoT]

@@maplion and as a person who goes outside that day, since I don't know where I stand in that "calculated cell", I suppose it basically mean I have 50% chance of occupying the area where it rains, right? Or because a chance of rain means it will happen at some point so it is as space AND time thing?

[@maplion]

@@RottenMuLoT If the area is mostly flat with no bodies of water, then yes; but generally, there are additional factors that the calculation by itself doesn't offer. For example, if you're near hills or mountains and that is part of the cell, then the area where the hills are is more likely to be part of that 50% just because of the nature of moist air being pushed up higher in elevation increases the relative humidity, meaning that if rain is predicted, some areas are more likely to be part of the rain area than others. Bodies of water also increase the likelihood (e.g., lake effect). So while generally you can think of it as "50% chance I'll be in that area", if you think about it more in terms of your geography, you can probably make a more accurate determination for yourself (e.g., I live near foothills and if it is at least 12% chance, I'm getting rain -- but those deeper in the valley usually only get wet if it is 50% or more).

[@ll7868]

What is North of the North Pole? South. It's like a Mobius Strip, once you're there you're on the other side of the there you were there to get to. Or you could think of it like that movie Upside Down from 2012 where two Earths exist simultaneously in the same space and the people interact with each other, like in an office building some people are on the ceiling and others are on the floor, they can pass things back and forth, talk to each other etc, one Earth is poor and the other is rich, but from each Earth's perspective the other Earth is upside down and backwards.

[@Sohel-fo2rr]

Did you find the relativity of temperature, light transfer between the solar systems and stars (light Sources)? That may make the sance of Time or Relative Timer.❤❤❤

[@RubenKuijsters]

I love this episode soooo much. thanks for this one lads

[@Zeerse_Chef]

Why would other universes have any close specific relationships to ours? such as why would there be any further instances of Chuck? That would presume events down to a spectacularly minute level are replicated such as Chuck's parents meeting, and their parents meeting and so on. Would it not be more probable that there's an Earth that never got hit by the asteroid and still has dinosaurs etc.?

[@verticalyetti1266]

because of the earths torus field for your first question

[@julianmcmillan2867]

If the many worlds interpretation, which I'm going to refer to as MWI, is true, then it means that there essentially an infinite number of possible worlds. Why? Because when a quantum event occurs, such as when an electron interacts with literally ANYTHING, the wave function collapses and that is what MWI would peg as a world popping into existence. So yes, within the MWI, there are a nigh infinite number of variations of Chuck. But it is not infinite since there would necessarily have to be worlds wherein Chuck's parents didn't meet. But, this introduces another problem, the problem of consciousness. If there are many Chucks as there are many worlds, are they all really "Chuck"? Because if we define Chuck as someone whose name matches his, whose heritage and genetics match his, then certainly, there are nigh infinite Chucks. But, do they all have the same consciousness? Are they all inherently Chuck? Are they all you? Are you an individual? Or are you concurrently living a nigh infinite amount of lives with no knowledge of them, but still technically experiencing all of them? This isn't a problem with the MWI itself, just an interesting mind bender about its implications.

[@therewillbecatswithgwenhwyfar]

I am loving the amount of excitement that space and cosmology offers. The things we don't know but will discover? I wish I were a theoretical physicist! I think in one of those other universes… There's a version of me who is that. ❤

[@marcoottina654]

3:40 "sothing" is like an "empty set": a container made of nothing in particular that can't ever never contain anything. This reminds me of the "void" type of Category Theory.

[@RottenMuLoT]

I was told that the "50% chance of rain" thing is not a statistical precision of the forecast but basically the territory's coverage of rain. So when it is 90% or rain it means 90% of the area subject to the forecast will get rain.

[@gunungstanman]

well that's the way the idiots think

[@janepatton8100]

And you believed it? The word "chance" is literally statistical vocabulary... 🤔.

[@isatousarr7044]

Quantum physics introduces the intriguing concept of the multiverse, suggesting that multiple, parallel universes might exist alongside our own. This idea arises from interpretations of quantum mechanics, such as the Many-Worlds Interpretation, which posits that every quantum event spawns a new universe. How does the multiverse theory challenge our understanding of reality, and what are the potential implications for our grasp of fundamental physical laws and the nature of existence?

[@findyourlevel9601]

50% chance of rain means that the entire coverage area will or will not be rained on depending on slight but uncontrolable and unpredictable flucuations in the local atmosphere. Mostly its about the weight and spread of the water in the clouds and cloud coverage. When the weight is over a certain limit and cloud cover is complete, the atmospheric flucuations will have minimal effect and the rain will push through. Thats 100 % coverage in the whole specific area. Even when you have 100% there are differences in the amount of water that falls in any specific spot. Who knows? Maybe one day they will be able to say, "it's going to rain everywhere except over NDT's house!"

[@nkululekololiwe106]

but how come Neil doesnt understand that.😔

[@TG-Maverick22]

I'm so glad there is a 2nd Startalk channel. Psyched! Subscribed

[@nancyhernandez2271]

Omgosh I hadn’t even noticed it was a different one

[@slimcuttava2929]

What if our dreams that we don't understand are a conscious connection between the other versions of us in the multiverse?

[@ShaunLodwig1987]

that's what i considered to be an option when i was growing up but the more i learned about the human subconscious and some of the impossible dreams i have had then i soon learned this isn't the case. Nice thought though :) plus ever since i was about 21 and heavily into science i strongly disagree with the possibility of a multiverse correlating with the other universes. For me there are 2 options for considering a multiverse - option 1, there is a multiverse but they don't relate to each other but the laws of physics are always the same. option 2, there is 1 opposite universe as anti matter (and 2 particles being in the same place at once [quantum physics] (in this case they would correspond with each other.). Ultimately i lean more in the direction of a Universe and no others, but there could easily be others that we would never know about (as i said in the options, if there is a multiverse then i don't believe they correspond with each other as in parallel universes with infinite possibilities). Multiverse wise - i am a believer that none of them relate just like the galaxies of our universe, and all their physical laws are the same, as i strongly believe the law of physics is the way it is because that's the only way it can be, it can only be 100% the way it is because that law is the basis for reality. Have a nice day and love your scientists :)

[@Moose92411]

Stop that immediately. Now my brain hurts.

[@questioningitall6856]

There are real theories based upon that thought.

[@subject20productions2]

I love this thought and have even made it a part of a story I'm working on. Really crazy thought, what if this is the dream and dreams are real?

[@simpleanswer8954]

@@questioningitall6856 Not theories, hypotheses. By definition a theory needs to be tested and appear to be true. That's a fundamental difference you need to be aware of when discussing concepts like this. When talking science and actual possibility the difference between a theory and a hypothesis is huge.

[@bomberman666]

If multiverses were formed at the beginning of the universe inception. There is no guarantee that the host speaker is created similarily and living a similar life. Each universe existed a certain amount of time to go a different timeline paths. Unless you copy paste the history of 1 universe to another not at the inception but after some time has passed.

[@Dyslexic-Artist-Theory-on-Time]

We only need three dimensions and one variable in the form of time, if we have a geometrical process that uses spherical symmetry. The geometrical aspect of this process can be based on Huygens’ Principle of 1670, that says: “Every point on a wave front has the potential for a new spherical 4πr² wave” Each point on the curvature of the wave front forms the potential for a new photon ∆E=hf of energy, a new oscillation or vibration as the future comes into existence. We have to square the radius r² of the sphere 4πr² because the process in unfolding on the spherical surface. The 2D surface form the two aspect of positive and negative charge. Therefore we have the speed of light squared c² we have the charge of the electron squared e² and the probability wave function is squared Ψ². This theory is supported by the fact that photon ∆E=hf energy is continuously transforming potential energy into the kinetic Eₖ=½mv² energy of matter, in the form of electrons e². Kinetic energy is the energy of motion, of what is actually happening! The interior of the sphere 4πr² is naturally three-dimensional with centre of the sphere forming a constant of minimum quantity within the geometrical process. We see this mathematically h/2π as the Planck Constant h divided by 2π representing the geometry. The Planck constant h/2π represents minimum quantity in space and time and is formed by the radius r² squared being a constant relative to the spherical surface. The 2π representing circular geometry that is formed by the spherical symmetry.

[@attoshtechnologies]

Since E = mc^2 is just an equation & not a fully functional formula, why do you always refer to it, and is E = γmc^2 any better?

[@DannyJoh]

Can relativity be an emergent feature from quantum physics?

[@ZagnutBar]

I love it when Chuck confirms that Neil is correct about something Chuck knows nothing about 4:30

[@generalnawaki]

5:55 hold up, I've always thought we were early to the party and it turns out its probably true. dang, I wish I had the math to go to school to learn the things Dr. Tyson knows.

[@julianmcmillan2867]

I mean, there is ALOT of contention about the many worlds interpretation. That interpretation, though elegantly simple and straightforward, is still quite ridiculed by the more institutionalised Copenhagen interpretation; basically, the Copenhagen interpretation is given automatic consensus. In other words, it is presumed by the broader physics community to be accurate. Even though it is convoluted and adds in unnecessary and inexplicable variables like the wave function collapse. It makes demands of quantum mechanics via assumption that we now have a problem confirming. If you just follow the Schrödinger equation's natural implications, you always end up with many worlds. But the Copenhagen pals want to force the Schrödinger equation to mean something else entirely.

[@vernonhowell4485]

Brilliant!!!

[@tanbui7869]

The background music is fire!

[@benwinegarner4797]

I so very much enjoy listening to Neil and Chuck. They have figured out a way to discuss these very complex theories in a way that someone like me not only understands them (to a reasonable point) but has also sparked an interest in me to want to learn more.

[@TheSouthernSiren]

Chuck at 1:51 🤣😂 (a virgin?🤦🏻‍♀)...😹 Chuck pay attention! We're talking quantum physics here!

[@NateTmi]

There should be no overlap if there is another universe because it was created in the same way our universe was & it is out side of our universe. If there is a connection or overlap, then it would mean some how our universe created a universe. I don't get why people think That me or you would exist in every universe or that earth would. We are not a critical component of the universe. We are only important to our planet. I don't see why anything based on me would need to exist in any other universe unless there is some connection or event that will happen in every universe. Something all universes need.

[@Ayumu31]

i always as a child had this question that what is space itself? tho there is nothing 100% vacuum in the known universe since there IS minuscule tiny particles everywhere, so hypothetically speaking IF there was a space in the universe THAT has no particles in that one spot, what is that empty part? is that space? so does space have no structure? And also comes the questions they talked about in the video, since the "space" we know of is inside our universe, then it it also space or something else higher dimension beings can see/understand on which our universe ball(just for example calling it a ball) positions itself?

[@larryhammer5926]

There are a lot of Multiverses, Alternate realities & parallel universes! Sincerely the senior foundation creator! Note this is not Larry!

[@KevinRodriguez-w2e]

Proposal: Galaxies as Independent Universes Originating from a Singularity Dear Dr. Tyson, I am writing to propose a speculative hypothesis for your consideration: what if each galaxy is not just a cosmic structure but an independent universe? Furthermore, could all galaxies have originated from a primordial singularity, similar to the one described in the Big Bang theory? Key Concepts: 1. Galaxies as Universes: Each galaxy, with its vast complexity, might function as a distinct universe governed by its own localized physical constants. 2. A Singular Origin: Instead of a singular universe expanding from the Big Bang, this hypothesis suggests that the singularity fragmented into multiple galactic universes during its initial expansion. Potential Implications: • Gravitational Anomalies: Phenomena attributed to dark matter may reflect inter-universal interactions. • Quantum Entanglement: Quantum connections across galaxies could indicate underlying ties between these “universes.” This idea draws inspiration from multiverse theories, eternal inflation models, and recent discussions about black hole cosmology. While challenging to test with current technology, I believe this hypothesis could spark valuable discussions in cosmology and physics. I would deeply appreciate your thoughts on this concept. Best regards, Kevin Rodriguez

[@SlickTim9905]

So basically if you don't clean your room in this universe, it's because you don't clean your room in other universes either.

[@KbB-uf2ot]

I understand that there’s things out there that I can’t understand.

[@JuliusUnique]

3:10 but can logic be outside of it? Is logic maybe something fundamental beyong the universe?

[@Itsanawfulwasteofspace]

I really love these twos. ❤

[@PalgunaGopireddy]

Oh. Neil, sir, you have created curiosity among many people, including me. This is 9 minutes of not lost time. Always admired by your knowledge. Thanks for starting this channel.

[@thomasmiller1135]

An infinite number of universes with ever-changing properties. We cannot even say with certainty whether multiverses exist. How do we know that the physical properties are different in every universe? Where does this idea come from? What if all universes have the same properties?

[@peaceinthemiddleeast4349]

Sothing, thanks chuck

[@ReefaBhanga]

Sothing. ❤

[@denizkendirci]

I noticed that people who are familiar with multiverse from sci-fi generally don't understand the concept of "divergence via decoherence" well. Because sci-fi always shows people a specific amount of decoherence, evil twins or people who looks almost exactly like you with small differences. But skips showing the possibilities where the counterpart is only one atom different than you (which humans consider the same practically) or where the counterpart is so different that it cannot be consider as a counterpart at all.

[@tiago.alegria.315]

The knowledge and theories we have is the human model of reality, how it works, but reality is what is real,exact, we may not understand in detail how reality is and works, but it already is in the flow of time and space

[@dhotnessmcawesome9747]

If there are an infinite amount of possible realities than somewhere out there the dark ages never happened and our tech is 800 years ahead of what it is now and someone has made an invention that made it so when we dream we "touch" another universe briefly. Also I'm wicked stoned right now. Could you tell?

[@Bigworse]

It is so amazing when you think we are all star people. We are all here because 🌟 stars started making other elements. So we owe a lot to star's.

[@theodorequist4904]

If the weather service is projecting a 50% chance of rain, that means that for the forecast area, about half of the area might expect to see some rain. It doesn't mean there’s a half chance of rain. That means that you might not get any rain at all, but other areas of the region may get rain.

[@ashirchristopher]

i have a few questions: 1) why are scientists sure that quantume physics wins at the beggining of the universe 2) particle have quantum fields from which they pop in and out of existance but universes?

[@PatrickFlynn-ry6oj]

I’m not an expert but I would guess that it’s not literally accurate to say that another version of me would exist in other universes. Sure, in other universes there could be other individuals that parallel me in every way or in almost every way, but that wouldn’t actually mean they literally are me it would just mean that they are someone else that is very similar to me.

[@milkshakeflake]

If in the beginning there were no elements at the time of the big bang and the elements were fused/forged in the stars, what were the stars made of if there were no elements?

[@kateri17]

All atoms in the universe began as hydrogen.

[@sourkoyote]

I'd like to see how many times I, in another universe died, while me, in this universe just went on my merry way without knowing I just narrowly escaped death.

[@JershomCrown]

awesome my guy

[@CWDarkly]

This is something I think about often when I consider the notion of infinity and absolute opposites. Existence and Oblivion, 1's and 0's, Is and Is Not. I wish I was a part of this conversation to exchange thoughts with you two.

[@Jen_lois]

I can share a whole paper written by me, not accepted yet, just give me your mail.

[@bigboy4006]

I love Chuck’s Mike Tyson impersonation! 😂😂😂😂

[@adamlabnaki9216]

4.34, video of Waterfall, where is that, someone please say!

[@alejandroriano3246]

Can you explain conscience and comun experience in reality? How can tgat be connected with quantum physics

[@lozD83]

3:40 Script guy boss: "Oh, inventing unnecessary words is tight"

[@kickedoutatone]

Wow this video really was sothing

[@Jen_lois]

I have a question from sir Tyson. If there are higher dimensions of space that mean nothing to us, then definitely they have a time of their own. But this only means time has no beginning/history, i.e. time has always been there, but we cannot detect that higher dimensional 'time'.

[@CaddilacJoe1]

so could these multiple universes be a result of a giant bang that causes a serious of infinite bangs and the great attractor is energy moving along to a destiny meeting point to do it all again or go back dormant until it stirs up again?

[@enoughstuff333]

Mind blowing

[@the_infinity_channel]

First like then watch 😂😂 love this guys 😊😊

[@waltb7707]

This style of the show was fun. Even the music was cool. Chuck and Neil works

[@hpbertin]

Wouldn't the process of the singularity to develop, need an surrounding of time, to be able to develop?

[@-----GOD-----]

Well, it depends on the definition of, "multiverse," being used. It also depends on whether or not people believe that possibility times infinity equals existence. You'd have to be more specific.

[@dragoonseye76]

I honestly believe we will have breakthroughs in MV research then with deep space manned exploration.

[@lordjerle]

First season TNG. They're taken outside of the known universe where the laws are determined by perception and thought. I'd love to see an analysis on that :)

[@BryanRobertAugustThul-ONELOVE]

Thank Y'all

[@Samm-rj5ls]

So if the universe didn’t begin at the size of an atom, would it still be possible for a multiverse?

[@CSLintheCASINO]

Found a new drinking game: every time that guy says, “Wow!”👀🥃😵

[@leeFbeatz]

As Clouds move, they are in different projected operability regions in proximity to the water cloud solutions as lightning/vicious gas held in the mantle. Their constant resonance of decay from the clouds brings fourth operability in elevation away from as well as time spent in the region for induction as it is happening constantly as the time to the mantle held cloud solutions of water in its operable form

[@alejandroriano3246]

Also can you explain why there is entropy but yet life is the opposite to entropy?

[@rumenaleksandrov4391]

That was GREAT - SOTHING … this is a new born philosophy 😎🍺✨💥😀

[@TheSouthernSiren]

😂 A agreed a whole lot of sothing. And Chuck's confesses he's an evil virgin with a goatee.

[@lmaskell5696]

50% chance of rain is used when the prediction applies to an area where half the area will get rain.

[@Americaisfukd]

So happy I came across this tonight 😊💯💜

[@r4z0r84]

Nice hypothetical, quantum entanglement would be cool to experience first hand, I like to think anytime you think of doing something but don't that happens in another multiverse and their timeline diverts from that. Doesn't matter if it's positive or negative you'll never know as you don't do it. But that also means that everything you ever think of doing has already been done by you in another multiverse and we never actually have a choice or free will. I do feel like there's a second earth of some description that people get a second chance on if they get taken too soon but there's no way of us knowing if this is already that second chance for us.

[@jacobb8832]

I people wish to change something in my past and get a second chance someday.

[@patelk464]

If multiple universes were created, would they necessarily have different properties, or could each one inevitably lead to the same physics?

[@dumaskhan]

yes

[@Savya492]

Since the plane/geometry of the universe is randomized at its big bang, yes

[@richardalbert5422]

Please, does anyone knows the sound track playing in the background from 4:30 - 5:00 ?

[@teamloidanne443]

Eye of the Tiger

[@richardalbert5422]

@@teamloidanne443 Thanks, by whom please?

[@INCOMEINSIDER10X]

0:44 isn't this logo of siri?

[@lebogangmotingoe]

It is 💯

[@richrocks213]

Although their may be othe universes, the odds of being another you are not possible. Think about all your ancestors before you which had to meet in order for you to have your DNA composition. In saying there is another you means there is a larger being controlling us, and nothing we do really matters because it's all predetermined.

[@jasonmilgate6769]

😊 no existence, to existence is outwards the 1st direction collectively 3d and = nothing + movement ect ect. Calculate all possible directions as pos or neg as the individual scale =1d use balance to then overlap the scale=2d of directions remember a pos can be a neg and a neg a pos there is only two collective directions at this point + + = outward and - - = inward. Also, from no existence, apply cause, effect, and outcome to the directions expansion and by using time as a measure of the dimensions expansion apply time and then cause effect and outcome become future, present, past. Because existence and no existence are opposites, then there will always be balance, balance works in all directions, so apply Schroedingers cat until the 3rd dimension 😊 then a black hole kind of works inside out and outside in directionally, every overlap is the expansion rate growing in all directions. This is why I think that what you call muliverse is actually overlapping scales of dimensions and size, and then the atomic scale fits beautifully overlapping the quantum scale, making Schroedingers de javu a natural biological possibility but also remember we are a build up of the past on two overlapping collective 3d scales and your just dreaming about the outcome until you actually get there 😊 this equation I call the direction outcome can be used to do just that. On any scale of existence..... 😊Maybe😊 🖖

[@abdulmuhammad-md7xi]

Each individual is a universe, humanity Multi-verse. When you enter someone's life, that is another universe, and it adds to your own universe which is why relationships can be chaotic. Harmonizing your inner world is key, so that you can differentiate your own energy vs theirs, you do not want to be in everyone's universe, getting sucked in and caught up forgetting yourself. The universe has black holes, observe others, be cautious.

[@QuintessentialGaymer]

Wait... When Dr Tyson says "there was a particle, and a second later big bang" that's for us because time as part of space time is contained within it, are we technically Dr. Manhattan style still experiencing the big bang in some imperceivable dimension? 🤔 Gotta listen to enough of these to figure out if that's anywhere close to right

[@paulholsters7932]

"when the universe was the size of a particle." what's the reason we are sure there must have been such a tiny universe? expansion does not se em like an enough reason to assume this? was there ever a singularity to begin with?