Why Russia FEARS Sweden, Norway, Denmark and Finland Alliance | AMERICAN REACTION

[@darthetraveler]

click this link to add Nordic military videos to the playlist on KZbin so I can react to them. kzbin.info/aero/PLfH-QKxjyz5L8VMeKycL3Ws4mMRrMo60k&jct=e0rqD4GivnejKxrmu12JDg

[@lillanlofgren7424]

In our soul ,Finland is a part of Scandinavia . They are our brothers just like Norway

[@Finland-SkiTeam39-40]

Nordic brothers; only possible threat comes somewhere else.

[@juhakorpi8372]

Kiitos Lillan

[@olenilsen4660]

Nah, not really, and Denmark isn´t either! Because Scandinavia is a peninsula consisting of Norway and Sweden. Finland might touch a bit at the top, but nobody lives there, on either side of the border. However, both the Danes and the Finnish are our Nordic brothers and we count each and every one of them as our own siblings! Every bit of banter you might´ve heard of is like the shenanigans that brothers and sisters will try out on eachother, just for fun! We love our Nordic neighbours, and we will most certainly die for them!

[@Patrik6920]

@@olenilsen4660 if u mean the Peninsula its Norway, Sweden, Finland .. depending how u define the peninsula most or Northen and west Finland OR whole of it, and a part of Russia is also part of the peninsula .. ..Norway-Sweden togeter is part of the peninsula apart thay are not as the shared border is to long...

[@Patrik6920]

🇸🇪💛💙🤍🇫🇮

[@landersen8173]

The russian numbers are outdated. Ukraine has destroyed impressive amounts of russian military hardware incl. 30% of the russian Black Sea fleet.

[@Pataassa]

Never underestimate a Russian. It is never as weak as it seems, and never as strong as feared. Greetings from Finland.

[@landersen8173]

@@Pataassa True. We can´t underestimate them. Greetings from Denmark.

[@BorderGuardJaegerFinlandia]

We dont underestimate the Russians, but we would never let them take our country by force, period. This time we are ready and totally prepared, unlike during WW2. We have been training every single day since basically 1945.

[@pekkajarvinen69]

Tbh Finland has been the frontline for almost a thousand years. Our first recorded fight was in 1042, when russians called their land Novgorod. We have been defending ever since. Our history of defending against russian aggression goes way, way back in time. Dozens of wars later, we are still here.

[@jeschinstad]

What the fuck is the guy in the video talking about? First he says Finland is Scandinavian, then he says calling Nordic countries friendly is a stretch? We love and respect each other a great deal and we are all members of The Nordic Council. We are extremely tight. I'm not aware of any other group of countries on this planet that are this close.

[@Patrik-pi3dl]

Finland will keep the border safe. Evil can try to get us, but every Finnish citizen will do their duty to defend our demorcacy.

[@pekkajarvinen69]

This is true. I will defend what is behind me when enemy is in front of me. This is our mindset. Always has been.

[@arcticblue248]

While I am Norwegian, my DNA tells me I am 20% finnish and 80% scandinavian ... so ofcourse the finns are my brothers and sisters.

[@sismofytter]

I actually think that the Scandinavian countries could win over Russia, because of better weapons and training

[@Pataassa]

Without Finland also? Finland isn't part of Scandinavia but part of Nordic yes.

[@CATOGUSTAVSON]

Geography wins the day to be honest. Finland has thousands of lakes on the border, Norway has ita crazy coast and mountains, sweden owns the Baltic sea.

[@sismofytter]

@@Pataassa Yes also without the fins

[@Gittas-tube]

@sismofytter Hello there! You are of course free to think whatever you like, but don't kid yourself. Better equipment and better training may be nice, but you only have to look at the war in Ukraine. The West is throwing billions and equipment at Ukraine and training their soldiers, and still it looks very unlikely that they could stop Russia and secure their own borders. That Russia would FEAR the Nordic countries is a ridiculous idea. It's as ridiculous as if the U.S. would FEAR, let's say, a country the size of Iceland - with a defense force and some fighter jets, warships and fancy electronics, but no nuclear missiles... To underestimate and belittle Russia's military power is a serious mistake. They have the numbers and no scruples. Evidently, the West and NATO, mostly, have been hellbent on seeing how far they can push Russia with no thought of what their dangerous 'game' might lead to for the world as a whole.

[@caprifolia1]

And we treat our people well. We know why we would fight. Baltic countries belong to our Nordic family, never forget that! Together we stand and would fight if necessary and now we help Ukraine to win Russian aggressor. In the North we do not attack, we defend! That is a great difference of thought and action. I fully trust our Nordic countries, Greetings from Finland

[@antevasterhaninge1007]

wtf happend to all of Swedens 100 jas 39 gripen in these stats

[@roxpace]

This is a bad comparing, so much fact faults and strange comparing, why is it important if Russia have aircraft carrier? They cant barely navigate with it in Baltic sea without being a clear target, that works better in other places, like bigger oceans. Also, compare military technology superiority where Russia will not win, Sweden and Finland wins there.

[@leifiseland1218]

The budget numbers for the Nordic countries is oudated aswell. 2024 Swedens defence budget constitutes 2,2% of it's GDP, or about 12 billion Euros, ie almost twice the numers qouted here. & Odds are it will continue to rise..🧐

[@BenjaminVestergaard]

The video you found exaggerates various elements. If any of the Nordic countries are ready for direct confrontation with RU... that would be Finland and Sweden. Regarding military spendings compared to GDP, the numbers used are way outdated. I think there are only the Baltics spending more per capita on military after RU invaded Ukraine. That said, Denmark isn't super prepared for confrontation... we only meet Russian forces when they invade our air space above Bornholm. But would the Nordic countries defend each other? No fricking doubt... we'll defend the Baltics too if that's how we avoid RU on our soil.

[@olenilsen4660]

Nah, your numbers are outdated! Look it up - In Norway we´re redirecting funds for defense right now. OFC, the Baltics spend even more, as they´ve experienced the Soviet empire directly, and they are closer to the problem. You´re also ignoring the fact that Norway has a bordeer with Russia, but you´re including Sweden who has the same tiny border up north. the Finnish are bordering Russia all the way on the Eastern front. You´re right about the brotherhood though! We will most certainly stay with our brothers in the Nordics if anything goes down!

[@BenjaminVestergaard]

@@olenilsen4660 I'm sorry, what numbers in particular? That the Baltics have spent more compared to the Nordics if you compare populations and GDPs? In that case I'll be happy (and a little proud) to be wrong. Ukraine needs all the help it can get. Edit: anyway, when I say Sweden and Finland are more prepared... I mean, they have significant sizes of militaries already... it's not just assigned monetary values... and while Sweden does have a little land border with Russia... they've also got submarines in the Baltic sea. Edit 2: they were prepared to meet RU without NATOs article 5 before they joined NATO.

[@KungKokkos]

Russian airforce is so strong they are hardly seen at all in Ukraine. Im willing to bet fennoscandia would kick their asses in the air with superior aircraft, training and planes that actually work.

[@SteamboatW]

"Qui desiderat pacem, præparet bellum." // Vegetius

[@olenilsen4660]

I´m sorry to say I have to acknowledge that fact. In this day and age, we still can´t find peace in this world to coexist just as people, can we?

[@Gittas-tube]

@SteamboatW Or: Si vis pacem, para bellum, the actual phrase being Igitur gui desiderat pacem, præparet bellum. We learned that in history class at school some seventy years ago. That's what you can expect from the Rome of Antiquity, although it appears that the idea existed much earlier in Ancient Greece (Plato). Parabellum is a well-known trademark for a type of semi-automatic pistol among other things. As to the meaning of the phrase that if you want peace, you should prepare for war, the world still seems to be stuck in the belief that might makes right and that violence and power are the ultimate and only lawmakers. However, time marches on and even Man has changed and has begun to think before he acts much more than before. Nuclear weapons in the hands of Medieval Man would have been used almost immediately with no thought at all of the consequences. Today, we do at least hesitate a bit...

[@TomKirkemo-l5c]

FEAR the Nordics!! :D I'm Norwegian. But remember, Finland alone beat Russia in the Winter war of 1939.

[@j3mixa]

This video assumes a lot of things that aren't exactly 100% true. It gives the impression that we, the Nordics are some weaklings who are running to NATO for protection when things get hot. Like we hadn't been allied with NATO before the full membership. For the last couple of decades before joining NATO, Finland was only namely neutral. There were regular NATO exercises done in Finland and the US solders came here to learn and practise their skills on winter warfare. We were also invited to some of NATOs meatings regularly. Finland stayed officially neutral because we've had lots of experience on why it's not a good idea to irritate Russia for no good reason. We have a saying about not waking up the bear. We had hopes, just like most of Europe did, that Russia was going to a more democratic and reasonable direction. When Russia attacked Ukraine, it became clear that that was not the case. Once they proved that they were ready to take land from Ukraine by force, we saw that the bear had already awaken. There was no reason for us to remain neutral from that point on. That's one of the reasons why the public opinion on joining NATO turned so fast. We're practical people and now we were finally free to officially express who we've been standing with for years. No reasons left to stand back and pretend that Russia is our friend.

[@olenilsen4660]

I´m so sorry, did your pu55y get hurt?

[@janihaavisto79]

The fact that Russia at least used to have more of everything is old news. During winter war Soviet Union was in deep trouble with Finland alone back in mid 1940's. And because all the sanctions post by western nations against Russia, war in Ukraine where even most optimistic valuations are that Russia loses about 1000 men every day, has already lost pretty much all of it's modern battle tanks, and tracked vehicle's, even losing many of their Jet fighters and few battle ships. Putin has been forced to bring old world war 2 era tanks from storage to trying to take Ukraine to themselves. Also most Russian soldier's lack good training ,armor, and weaponry. So it really is way more evenly matched if Russia and Scandinavian countries would go to war rivht now.. Some western military specialists valueate that war against Ukraine has put Russia back some 50-60 years in terms of war capabilities. Also all Scandinavian countries do have most modern weaponry and best training.

[@LynxLord1991]

Its Europe everybody has beef most are just choosing peace over old grudges

[@Randomdude21-e]

Russia never moved on

[@LynxLord1991]

@@Randomdude21-e Yeah among others

[@olenilsen4660]

What? That sentence really don´t mean anyting in my vocabulary, it´s more like a question mark...

[@audunholme7273]

When looking at the number of tanks Norway has, it should be taking into consideration the terrain in Norway. In Norway we have mountains and other natural barriers. Which I think is not good for tanks. In Russia there are large flat fields, where tanks can drive more easily..

[@M.E.G.A]

If you include Finland to scandinavia it´s called Fennoscandia

[@KristoferOlsson]

Then you have to include a part of Russia to. Kola Peninsula is part of Fenoscandia. Then Denmark has to be excluded.

[@M.E.G.A]

@@KristoferOlsson No you do not have to, Russia is not part of the question, only wheter finland is scandinavian or not. Russia on the other hand is "Mordor" and stole a large part of Karelia from Finland. Scandinavia is only Sweden and Norway by geography and includes Denmark by culture.

[@KristoferOlsson]

@@M.E.G.A You brought up Fennoscandia then a small part of Russia is Included. It do not matter if you like Russia or not. Its like saying Norway is not part of Europe because you dont like Norway. Scandinavia is the Three Kingdoms in the North. Nordics is the Three kindoms + the 2 republics Finland and Iceland. Fennoscandia or Scandinavian peninsula is purley geographicall. Sweden, Norway Finland and Parts of Russia.

[@M.E.G.A]

Finland is a part of Fennoscandia nobody asked if russia is a part, You only want to be important and say "i know rrussia is a part" who the fack cares?

[@tgh1972]

How old is the video, russia def doesn't have 12000 tanks anymore lol

[@1891726]

That's not quite right. Sweden today has a standing troop in peacetime of 32,000 soldiers. Should it break out, we have a reserve force of up to 70,000 then I have included our conscripts as well , which will mean that we can deploy 102,000 men. The Swedish defense is to be strengthened to 90,000-100,000 men by the year 2030, then we will also have the home guard of over 30,000, but it takes time to build up. Finland is not correct either, they have a standing force of 280,000 thousand men, they can mobilize a total of 900,000 which we could also do between the 60s and 80s. Which would mean that only we and Finland can mobilize a total of 1,002,000 and then all reserves are also called up. So no, this video is not quite right. And then we haven't counted on Norway and Denmark either. I think those numbers match pretty well

[@runeversveen9598]

The Nordic countries are definitely building their military capacity with high quality equipment. JAS Gripen and F-35 plains have a much different qualities then ruski plains for example. And weapons build in the Nordic countries can match anything simular built in other countries.

[@CATOGUSTAVSON]

Why not just say "Nordic"?

[@herrbonk3635]

Because that (Norden) is mainly a local name. Germans, Brits and Americans still call us Scandinavians. So still including old eastern Sweden (Finland), although Germans generally exclude current Denmark (without Skåne, Blekinge).

[@CATOGUSTAVSON]

@@herrbonk3635 I'm aware, but It's still wrong though. If people who are not familiar with the distinction between Scandinavia and the Nordic region and need a source, please look up the official body for formal inter-parliamentary Nordic cooperation among the Nordic countries called the Nordic Council.

[@samuelgustavsson1483]

None of the northern countries will attack another country for no reason. Its like ”dont fire until fired upon”. But that doesnt mean they cant fight. And today, when they all have an open alliance…only a fool would attack them on their own soil. I am from Sweden and I always say the nordic countries is like a bunch of sibblings. We love to annoy and tease each other….but we also share the same blood. If you start to mess with the vikings…you need to prepare yourself for having some really, really bad times ahead of you.

[@jeschinstad]

Finland is absolutely never referred to as a Scandinavian country. Nor should it be. It's Nordic and Fennoscandic, but it isn't Scandinavian, which explicitly refers to Norway, Sweden and Denmark. Why anyone would care about this, is beyond my comprehension since there's no actual difference.

[@novoiperkele]

Well, depends on the definition.. Denmark isnt in the Scandinavian peninsula. Part of Finland is..

[@jeschinstad]

@@novoiperkele I don't understand why people are so desperate to confuse this. The peninsula is named after Scandinavia, not the opposite. Finland was not part of the Norse culture and thus is not Scandinavian. Iceland had not been discovered yet and is thus not part of Scandinavia.

[@Galantus1964]

A man who never knew when to admit defeat.. and here i thought we were talking about Putin and not Trump ..

[@matssvensson3834]

gammla sifror

[@spyro257]

while Sweden was applying for NATO membership, they had the official protection of NATO, meaning if they got attacked, NATO would react and protect them...

[@olenilsen4660]

I can assure you that NATO would never store a nuclear device closer to Russia than what´s stated in the agreement. And Russia has never neglected this agreement by flying their military aircraft over foreign airspace.

Srsly, what heck is this? 1.3%?! Latest official number for Sweden is 2.2% of GDP. We do, as such, meet the 2% requirement of NATO.

[@stonie0212]

Count Denmark out. No army, no operational frigates and a very small air force

[@UltimaSRi]

Its time to have the Finnish borders reset to b4 the winter war..

[@Pataassa]

By 1700-1721 russia killes half of hole finnish population and tortured those who remained. This time is called the greath wrath. In the 19th century, Finland was again attacked by Russia. At that time they conquered Finland but gave Finland autonomi. Finland became independent in 1917 and already in 1939 Russia attacked again and the winter war began. Finland kept its independence but lost its territories, such as Karelia. Finland's neutrality remained after the winter war until the Ukrainian war, when Finland saw its opportunity and joined NATO with support over 80% of finnish people. We had always belonged to the West but we couldnt join nato before.

[@olenilsen4660]

Well, you could, but there was also the part where Nazi Germany helped you fight the Bolcheviks during WW2. That hit pretty hard with some people. Norwegians that supported SF in that war are still called Nazis... there´s a lot of butthurt going around in these wars..

[@Pataassa]

@@olenilsen4660 Well, if you properly familiarize yourself with the background of the war in question (continuation war), you will find out that Finland had no options. Germany was the only country that gave us weapons and attacked Russia at the same time we were trying to get back the lands and people's homes that were stolen from us. In addition to Germany, Sweden sold us weapons. Sold, did not give. No other country helped Finland fight against a country many times bigger than itself. A common enemy unites if one's own family is in danger. Finland never had anything else to do, let alone shared values, with Germany at that time. After all, Finland was also at war with Germany, the war in question is called the Lapland War. Finland also never participated in the siege of any city or the murders of civilians. That was the Finnish border. So if someone has a problem with that, they have a lack of knowledge of the facts.

[@Pataassa]

Russia will never attack toward sweden for one simply reason: they have no reason to do that. Norway instead has oil what they want and finland is a land, what they have always wanted to be their gate to west. With their rules. So norway and finland is more in danger. Finns is the one who has always had to fight because of west values. Thank god we are part to nato now, so we dont have to fight for democraty by our selves if shit happens again.

[@olenilsen4660]

Yeah, well - If Russia some day decides to attack a NATO country - they´ll find out why they lost the race to the moon...

[@Michels_Supercars]

500,000 Russian soldiers have died in the war with Ukraine and most of the tanks and military vehicles are destroyed in Ukraine and they were old, Russian technology is 20 years behind the technology of Western countries

[@LynxLord1991]

Well we did just give Ukraine most of our stuff. I doubt Russia can do much they can barely give handle Ukraine and Russia did just loose a bunch. We choose neutrality and Germany said f that and invaded anyway

[@DONTHASSLETHEHOFF]

Neutrality regarding?

[@LynxLord1991]

@@DONTHASSLETHEHOFF WW2

[@DONTHASSLETHEHOFF]

@@LynxLord1991 Sweden was NOT neutral in WW2. You need to read up on that one.

[@LynxLord1991]

@@DONTHASSLETHEHOFF Sweden was neutral hence they didnt get attacked but Im referring to Denmark

[@DONTHASSLETHEHOFF]

@@LynxLord1991 Sweden was not neutral. Sweden helped the nazis with lots and lots.

[@Darktiger01]

Yeah don't feel like this video present a honest view of the situation. The russian numbers have been severly declined during the war and the numbers was bloated from the beginning with old broken and rusted equipment.

[@janskogsberg8668]

Well Scandinavia have the geography as a defense. You can only “invade” Sweden etc through naval assault (which Russia has little) or through the narrow part of the to of Sweden and Norway. They also need to cross several wide rivers and there are only so many roads you can go through as there is dense forests and mountains etc which makes it ”easy” to defend. Also Russia don’t have carriers etc in the Baltic Sea and all their military can’t be at one place at pone time. They need to keep their whole country safe so all that military ”might” needs to be spread of over their whole country. So for them to attack Scandinavia and ”win” easy is just a pure of lie. They would have a really hard time fighting that war. And Scandinavia and the Nordics aren’t interested in “attacking another country especially not a shitty and worthless peace of crap country like Russia. Nobody wants to have Russia except maybe the Russians themself probably not even them self tbh..

[@evahallenberg9465]

they dont have eny longer! 9k is eliminated of the russian tanks theydont have eny longer eny logistic its gone!

[@hrafnatyr9794]

This comparison / report by no means tells the whole correct story. I also do not understand the angle and the narrative of the article at all. By omitting / understating / exaggerating essential information, I find the article as a whole at best completely pointless and at worst pure misinformation. For example, the military budget in 2024 is from about $7 billion to well over $8 billion per Nordic country which they should know. Another thing that doesn't come up at all is that all the Nordic countries all have tailored their defenses (everything from materials to exercises) to suit each country's geographical conditions. That Russia would have big problems invading for example Finland is quite certain (they tried in 1939) and even more so now that all the countries are in NATO, which of course gives the opportunity to invoke article five but above all gives large logistical advantages, not only for the Nordic countries but for the entire Baltic Sea region. Russia on the other hand has extremely poorly developed infrastructure along the entire Finnish border with only a single railway between Russia's more central parts all the way to Murmansk and also a very sparse and outdated road network. The Baltic Sea also nowadays is a close thing to a Nordic / Baltic / Polish / German inland sea with only the harbor in the small enclave of Kaliningrad the only russian harbor in the Baltic Sea beeing ice-free all year round. Kaliningrad is furthermore completely enclosed by Poland and Lithuania, both of which are NATO members, and also has only a single railway that runs through Lithuania to Russia. Both Sweden, Norway and Finland have extremely modern and well-developed naval forces and have practiced coastal defense for decades (side track: In a joint war game in 2005, a Swedish Gotland-class stealth submarine managed to repeatedly sink the American aircraft carrier USS Ronald Reagan without ever being detected 😉😁). Both Sweden, Denmark, Norway and Finland have State of the Art air forces with, for example, the F 35 in Norway, Denmark and Finland and Sweden's JAS 39 Gripen, which is a multi-role aircraft developed and adapted for Nordic conditions and among other things have world-leading technology for electronic warfare. Furthermore, I am quite convinced that Russia's superiority in terms of things like tanks / other armored vehicles and also naval forces is greatly exaggerated. Why else would they deploy quite a substantial number of old refurbished tanks like T-62s and T-72s from the 1960s and early 70s in Ukraine. Both their tanks and other armored vehicles have also proven to be quite inferior to the likes of Abrams, Leopards, Bradleys and the Swedish CV-90 and also very vulnerable to Ukrainian weapons such as their specially developed anti-tank drones. The Russian fleet in the Black Sea has been largely inactive and tucked away in harbors far from Ukraine for the past two years, especially since their pride and flagship for their Black Sea fleet, the guided-missile cruiser Moskva, was sunk by Ukrainian land-based missiles in 2022. Russia's only aircraft carrier Admiral Kuznetsov has been in dry dock in Murmansk since 2017 awaiting repairs and upgrades and has suffered several accidents and fires in the meantime. I would like to say that Russia's military power can be fairly accurately described with a few key words: Incompetence, grave, bordering on unimaginable corruption, top management from politicians with no military skills, propaganda / exaggerations and overall aging and very badly maintained material. If Russia were ever to get serious about any of their many nuclear threats, there is hardly much ANYONE can do, but firstly, a large part of western Russia would become quite uninhabitable in the event of a nuclear attack on, for example, Finland or Sweden, because of the prevailing weather conditions in and around the Baltic Sea and secondly, I wouldn't be very surprised if the general rot in the Russian military also extends to their nuclear arsenal.

[@benthansen3415]

This video you reacted to should tell you why we (I'm from Denmark) fear that Trump will win the US election! Trump has said that Putin, as far as he's concerned, is free to attack NATO countries that don't pay their share! What about article 5? Trump has said that the US might leave NATO because other members do not pay their share. That's true, but; what about article 5?

[@marviv3180]

dont want the vikings united...

[@soulman0]

This guy leaves out a VERY important note. The Scandinavian technology in weaponry!! Russian weaponry i way outdated in comparens

[@herrbonk3635]

Not really.

[@Peter-yk2hh]

Finland is skandinaviska period. And Finland sweden ar briters. Ibfmdint lever out sexrets a awede is siolent.

[@Zandain]

1. Finland is NOT Scandinavia, never has, never will be...the presentator's perfunctory conclusion is ignorant and crude! They are proud Nordics! 2. 'When' is near past for the presentor? Russia invaded and occupied the Danish island of Bornholm after WWII - they didn't leave before 1 whole year had passed! They had figured that they could stay there, and have a foothold in the Baltic!!! 3. I believe the numbers from Russia are very skewed, as their numbers have dwindled substantially since they invaded the Ukraine 4. Denmark was neutral during WWI, but not WWII hello from Denmark 🌸

[@lillanlofgren7424]

Finland seems more close to us than Denmark ...ok...hello from north of Sweden

[@Tingelingkiss]

So you didn't really listen to what he said 🙄 Try again 😉

[@olenilsen4660]

@@lillanlofgren7424 That´s a NO from the south of Norway, an neither is Denmark! Scandinavia is a peninsula! But you are our §Nordic brothers!

[@Finland-SkiTeam39-40]

...not yet even seen the reaction but I know what direction this is going...; Russia will never attack Nordics. And the Swedes are in safe 🙂

[@olenilsen4660]

First impression - I should not continue listening to you, because it´s really hard to make out the words you´re trying to make. Please speak up, and not just mumble into the mike. You´re good, trust us - just raise your voice to let us know. You´re the one teaching us stuff, have some confidence ;) I´ll keep on listening though, because I want to know about your take, and I´m Norwegian. So let´s roll!

[@johanbergel1926]

Finland is NOT a Scandinavian country.

[@Tingelingkiss]

Listen one more time and try to understand what he is saying 🙄

[@EricTheBroBean]

Also take into consideration, during WWII, Russia aided and invaded Norway, effectively taking it back from the nazis. Russia had full control over Norway, and gave the control back to Norway without any demands. Staying neutral in the Russian Ukrainian conflict is in everyones best interest, but NATO keeps giving weapons to Ukraine for the sole purpose of weakening Russia without directly involving themselves, a cowardly act in my opinion.

[@KungKokkos]

Not helping Ukraine would mean Putin doesn't learn, and the Baltics would be next, then Poland, then onwards. Your arguments is exactly what let Hitler move forward one step at a time, the unwillingness to put your foot down and say not one more inch.

[@EricTheBroBean]

@@KungKokkos There are actual reasons behind the conflict in Ukraine, Russia has no reason to invade country after country just to gain territory. Whether you or I agree with the reasons or not, they are still factually undisputable reasons. NATO has also been pushing on Russias borders even after the Warzaw pact was disbanded, if Russia was to push on the US borders they would react the exact same way. NATO are the ones in the wrong here.

[@KungKokkos]

@@EricTheBroBean There are Russians living in Baltics too, you can just listen to Putins imperialistic speeches yourself. People like him don't stop, Napolean didn't stop at Belgium and Putin wouldn't stop with Ukraine if he could continue.

[@olenilsen4660]

well, id they´d known about the oil in 1945, the story would´ve been different.

[@EricTheBroBean]

@@KungKokkos Sending weapons to Ukraine isnt helping them, its just prolonging the war. All NATO cares about is weakening Russia without being in the frontlines themselves, Ukraine is basically their human fodder.

[@Glaaki13]

What a bunch of crappy propaganda

[@sismofytter]

Russia is the biggest country on earth

[@Randomdude21-e]

Its full of nothing really..

[@sismofytter]

@@Randomdude21-e yes

[@lillanlofgren7424]

But that country don`t belong to the people . Your country is not Russia ...it is the land of Kreml

[@olenilsen4660]

@@Randomdude21-e Very much like the US of A then ;)

[@Randomdude21-e]

@@olenilsen4660 yep, most people live in a few places in USA too. But they have over double the population and russia is almost twice as big as usa in size