1:06 that's what makes the Edsel story so sad, they had such high hopes for this car including a 1 hour TV special.
@jerry389011 ай бұрын
I've always thought that the biggest problem with the Edsel was it's position in the lineup. Mercury was introduced for the 1938 model year to compete with the Pontiac, GM's lower mid range car. The Edsel needed to be an upper mid range car to compete with Buick and Oldsmobile. People thought of Mercury as a Pontiac equivalent, so was Edsel a Ford plus or Mercury minus. There was no room between Ford and Mercury, but a huge gap between Mercury and Lincoln.
@houseofbusiness6910 ай бұрын
This is a great analysis, thanks for contributing!
@lancasterritzyescargotdine26027 ай бұрын
When the first Mercury appeared, it was the "Ford Mercury", a luxury model above the Ford Standard and Ford De Luxe lines. For 1940 it was its own line, standing between Ford and Lincoln.
@RickTBL11 ай бұрын
I love the '58 Edsel. I think the problem was the name. Edsel sounds old-fashioned for 1958. In '59, Buick had Electra and Invicta, much more space-age sounding.
@lancasterritzyescargotdine26025 ай бұрын
That's true, but neither Electra nor Invicta were actual words of any substance, having a myriad of unfocused meanings. Edsel was simply the man's name. And yes, it was indeed awkward. The problems were three-pronged: styling, quality, recession.
@nykolehodges2736 Жыл бұрын
These cars do have style... I believe the Edsel would make it in today's world. As a compact car. Yes. I like the Edsel .. unique styling. America missed this one ...
@richardrice807611 ай бұрын
Fun fact: the '60 Comet was to be the '60 Edsel. But by that time the decision had been made to pull the plug on the Edsel. The Comet was a stand alone model until 1962 when it became the Mercury Comet.
@wilburross97094 ай бұрын
Dad told me that the cars didn't live up to the hype. Maybe he and his friends were expecting too much, but with all of the ads about the 'car of tomorrow' etc., they remembered the Lincoln Futura show/concept car from a few years before that and were hoping for something that looked more like it. So when the Edsel was unveiled and it looked like this, they were disappointed to say the least!
@chuckinnc4184 Жыл бұрын
Great, informative video! Many of these reasons for failure are sounding very familiar to Ford's current failures with EVs.
@houseofbusiness6910 ай бұрын
Good point! Perhaps I should make a video on their current EV focus?
@lancasterritzyescargotdine26027 ай бұрын
Ford's failed EVs? What about GM's EVs? Name one that didn't go over like a turd in a punch bowl.
@Loki91-hc6js Жыл бұрын
You just earned yourself a new subscriber, sir!
@houseofbusiness69 Жыл бұрын
Awesome, thank you!
@kevinguitar12247 ай бұрын
Not a FORD EDSEL, just Edsel! It was it's own make, same as Mercury.
@houseofbusiness693 ай бұрын
So.. What? The Ford Edsel is not a Ford? The car was an Edsel, without any influence from Ford?
@selwocc2 ай бұрын
@@houseofbusiness69 - If you tell your neighbor that you like his "Ford, Lincoln" - he’s likely to give you a bloody nose! It’s not a Ford, Edsel. Just like it’s NOT a Ford, Mercury.... NOT a Ford Lincoln.... Get it, now!?
@dma1242 ай бұрын
@@houseofbusiness69Right.. It is just as the same as not being a General Motors Buick.. or a Chrysler Dodge. If you’re calling it a Ford Edsel, you’re just illustrating your own ignorance of the subject, and people are responding to you and your content based on that.
@1940limited15 күн бұрын
The Ford Edsel failed because most people didn't buy the right car. The Pacer and Ranger were available with conventional shift mechanisms and even stick shift. Had more of those ben turned out the troublesome Tele-Touch drive wouldn't have been so prolific. In the area of the Citation and Corsair, Tele-Touch was standard. It should have been optional. Might have saved a lot of headaches. I'd love to have a red Pacer convertible, stick with OD. I wonder if one was ever built?
@johntracy729 ай бұрын
Edsel: Every Day Something Else Leaks
@richardrice80767 ай бұрын
Yes sir.
@theprinceofsnj5 ай бұрын
Very good, well put together. One point you failed on was Robert McNamara's involvement with it's disconsolation. He didn't want it from the get go. Many years ago I had the pleasure of meeting Roy Brown. Yes it was at a Edsel convention. And yes I own an Edsel. And did you know the Falcon and Comet were originally designed to be Edsel's.
@houseofbusiness695 ай бұрын
Thanks! That is a good point, and should probably have been included. Appreciate you filling in some gaps though :)
@djimiwreybigsby526326 күн бұрын
It was a victim of a gullible society in bad press
@JohnnyFox-je3fr Жыл бұрын
Interesting, subscribed!
@houseofbusiness69 Жыл бұрын
Welcome aboard!
@MaiBenteHansson Жыл бұрын
Great video with lots of interesting facts 🤔
@houseofbusiness69 Жыл бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it!
@iainholmes27356 ай бұрын
It was certainly a learning curve.
@kurtnilsson6960 Жыл бұрын
There´s no car named Ford Edsel! It´s Edsel Ranger,Pacer,Corsair,Citation,Bermuda e.t.c. Ford is one car make and Edsel is another.There´s no Ford emblem on an Edsel!
@richardrice807611 ай бұрын
Which was one of a myriad of factors that killed the Edsel. They had no dealer network. Fomoco tried to remedy that in '59 by selling them at Lincoln- Mercury dealers.
@lancasterritzyescargotdine26027 ай бұрын
@@richardrice8076 I don't know where you got your baloneyous information, but it's all wrong. By announcement day, Edsel had 1,200 dealers signed up, stocked and ready for business. They consisted of existing Ford and L-M franchises, other makes, used-car lots and newbies. When the car failed, it was merged with Lincoln-Mercury, effective January 1, 1958.
@richardrice80767 ай бұрын
@lancasterritzyescargotdine2602 baloneyous? Wow, will I find that in the dictionary? Merged with Lincoln Mercury? I have to admit I never heard that before.
@lancasterritzyescargotdine26027 ай бұрын
@@richardrice8076 You won't find 'baloneyous' in the dictionary for a few thousand years yet! The Lincoln-Mercury Division became the M-E-L Division, or Mercury-Edsel-Lincoln Division. After the Edsel was discontinued, it reverted back to Lincoln-Mercury.
@richardrice80767 ай бұрын
@@lancasterritzyescargotdine2602 MEL were the 3 brands sold at the dealer starting in the fall of '58. Before then Edsels were sold at Edsel dealers. The brand soldered on until Nov. of '59. You might have a little more credibility if you weren't making up stupid words. BTW Why would they sell new cars at a used car lot? No manufacturer has ever and never will sell their cars at some shady corner lot.
@ChuckNorris-yo3hu3 күн бұрын
The Edsel Ranger was produced 1958 1959 and 1960 not just 58-59
@1940limited15 күн бұрын
What Ford Motor Company lost on the Edsel as a drop in the bucket compared to the bath they've taken on EVs. I guess they haven't learned anything.
@user-zx8de8op9lАй бұрын
My mom's uncle had a 1958 station wagon
@David-yw2lvАй бұрын
The grille looked like a toilet seat.
@karancarnwright431210 ай бұрын
I remember everybody made fun of the Edsel!
@houseofbusiness6910 ай бұрын
Perhaps for a valid reason? :)
@davidrandall74368 ай бұрын
I like them. They. Look. 1950s
@gmck912049 ай бұрын
The best book on the subject is “Disaster in Dearborn: The Story of the Edsel” by Thomas Bonsall.
@lancasterritzyescargotdine26027 ай бұрын
A lot of trusting people paid for Bonsall's book, but he failed to deliver. I am one of those unfortunate victims. When I finally wrote, I received a snotty response from his boyfriend, chastising Edsel owners as ''greedy, uncaring; all they care about is their money," which he said he wouldn't return because he used it to pay for Tom's funeral.
@houseofbusiness695 ай бұрын
I would also recommend “Business Adventures” by John Brooks - an excellent book!
@lancasterritzyescargotdine26025 ай бұрын
@@houseofbusiness69 Brooks' book is among the most authoritative in print.
@chrisjeffries232222 күн бұрын
Ugly from any Angle
@mirzaali33092 ай бұрын
Wheel classic book
@glennmorris1807 Жыл бұрын
Edsel was very unattractive - and didn't survive in a Chevrolet World.
@richardrice807611 ай бұрын
That was the least of Edsels problems. When the blue oval gang realized that people who wanted to step up from Ford but couldn't afford a Mercury were taking their business elsewhere. The Edsel was to be a bridge car. Problem was the cheapest Edsel cost the same as the most expensive Ford and the most expensive Edsel cost the same as the cheapest Mercury. Whoops. Also there was a depression in'58 affecting car sales industry wide.
@DMBall6 ай бұрын
All you have to do is look at the ugliest grille in U.S. auto history to understand why the Edsel failed.