You also forgot to mention that, in the FNAF 3 files, the suits of the animatronics are called "gifts". Further implying that the animatronics are the gifts, they are what Puppet gave to the kids. It's such a good narrative. But it's also understandable that people believe WillStuffed.
@Spawnmatism7 ай бұрын
Yeah! That is a great piece of evidence, thank you for pointing it out. I didn't know how to put it in the script around the debunking, and I agree that WillStuffed is a very strong and valid theory to have, which is why there is pretty much a 50/50 split between PuppetStuffed and WillStuffed.
@Patolagos6 ай бұрын
What if it turns out that this is also the case in the movies? With Garrett becoming the puppet and William ordering the puppet to stuff the bodies in the animatronics...
@Spawnmatism6 ай бұрын
Could be! Kinda fitting for the Puppet to be controlled like a puppet by William.
@Kakikito12346 ай бұрын
The man on the phone clearly said that Pupet is always thinking. Apart from that before Jeremy (as Gusardia) there was Wiliam and Pupet, being in his box, could not see the changing of the guard, thinking that the player (us) is Wiliam Afton.
@Spawnmatism6 ай бұрын
I agree!
@Kakikito12346 ай бұрын
@@Spawnmatism 💝
@Kakikito12346 ай бұрын
In “your the band” Pupet have powers😊
@Spawnmatism6 ай бұрын
Yeah, it was really cool in that story. But I don't believe it showed it having the unique ability of fusing soul to machine.
@Kitkat-rz3gn7 ай бұрын
GREAT GOOGLY MOOGLY! another certified banger...i love the way you explain your points and i love your editing - you are a skilled and talented person and i can't praise you enough!!!!!!
@Spawnmatism7 ай бұрын
@echothesilent46937 ай бұрын
FINALLY, everyone makes thirty minute long videos with William stuffing as a basis despite having concrete evidence of otherwise even back in the 2nd game. I had to be disappointed so many times because many KZbinrs would ignore one of the most concrete facts, it's like ignoring the Mr.Afton name drop in SL but no one ignored that.
@Kakikito12346 ай бұрын
The Pupet literally want to save the dci, we can see that in “save them”
@Spawnmatism6 ай бұрын
Yeah! Same way it wanted to save the MCI, in my opinion. Im actually in the process of making a video about SAVETHEM and the DCI next.
@Kakikito12346 ай бұрын
@@Spawnmatism 🫶
@_o.0_7 ай бұрын
Do we really know Mike is an Afton, he could have just kid napped someone who turned out looking just like him, I think young and the restless was hinting that Mike WASN’T actually William’s son, even though the similarities are damning
@Spawnmatism7 ай бұрын
Mike calls William "father" after the events of Sister Location. Which is after he watched Immortal and the Restless, after he saw what his sister had become, and after he saw the experiment rooms. Things that would really make him hate William. So if Mike really was kidnapped by William, it wouldn't make sense for him to refer to him as father after knowing that he is not his true father and that he is instead an evil monster. But it would make sense if William is his actual father, as that would just be a matter-of-fact statement rather than out of endearment. But at the end of the day, what you are saying could be possible too. Since we only have Sister Location and FFPS as the only evidence that Michael is William's son.
@_o.0_6 ай бұрын
@@Spawnmatism the way he says “father” sounds sarcastic, like it could be referring to it as a “you turned me into this” instead of biological
@Wizardjones69Ай бұрын
Idk But with glitchtrap literally luring us into the stage, to become later freddy, and dance in Joy, implying that he's happy that we turned into freddy Already implies willstuff, and, on the novels The death of Elizabeth caused afton to commit the mci, not charlie
@duckisacoolguy7 ай бұрын
but I thought it was just a silly pizza restaurant
@Horrorbutterz7 ай бұрын
Nah there big spooky lore 👻
@Spawnmatism7 ай бұрын
The animatronics do get silly at night.
@Kakikito12346 ай бұрын
Michale brooks ≠ Michale afton
@Spawnmatism6 ай бұрын
Yeah, I do admit to they are depicted as very different characters besides the family name change. The "equation" I made in the video still works though, since you can instead say "If the character named Michael in the [insert media] is not Afton's son."