Why THIS is Canon’s BEST Beginner Camera

Why THIS is Canon’s BEST Beginner Camera | EOS R10 vs R50

Рет қаралды 18,278

Joseph Martin

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 39

@Adib-A 2 ай бұрын

How does this video have so little likes. You deserve more. AMAZING review and thanks a lot!!!

@JosephMartin 2 ай бұрын

Much appreciated! Glad you liked it :)

@alexisricalday4208 5 сағат бұрын

Just got the r10 for 600$ yesterday, i think it's worth as its cheaper than a retail r50

@areasevenpro 3 ай бұрын

Overall ergonomics was the deal breaker for me, as the R10 feels more like a real camera than the toyish R50.

@JosephMartin 3 ай бұрын

For sure!

@juhaaavalaakso455 3 ай бұрын

This. I have R50 and handle is too small. I will change it to R7 II or R10 II when those are released next year. I like small size but handle is too smal it could be bigger without making the camera any bigger

@VinayKumar-qb8rs 3 ай бұрын

Hello, Can you help? I have bought my first camera as R50 With 18-45mm kit lens + 50mm f1.8 lens. I didn’t like kit lens much as my iphone 13 pro pictures were better. And I really liked 50mm lens for great portrait. But when i went to London last week I could capture most of the places properly as i was not able to fit both subject and background like London eye or big ben in one frame. I had to move bit far to capture both. Now i have ordered 16mm 2.8 and 28mm 2.8 and I’m travelling to barcelona and rome next week. Can you suggest me which lens carry to capture the iconic places with me and family ? Thanks in advance.

@JosephMartin 3 ай бұрын

Nice kit! With the R50, I would recommend either carrying both the 16mm and the 50mm, or only the 28mm. In the first option, the 16 will work really well for architecture and wider portraits where you want the background in frame (plus it will be wide enough for selfies), while the 50 will give you decent reach to snap close portraits or detail shots. If you choose to only bring the 28mm, you’ll have an awesome middle of the road lens that can capture most architecture/landscape shots, while still being long enough to avoid much distortion on portraits- though you wont have much reach if you want to get detail shots. In the end, all these lenses are so small and light, i would even recommend bringing all three- but it totally depends on your needs. Maybe travel with all three but try out different daily carries while leaving the rest of the lenses at the hotel room. I find that restricting my focal length choices enables me to be more creative with shots, which is a lot of fun! Have a great trip, and safe travels!

@VinayKumar-qb8rs 3 ай бұрын

@@JosephMartin great thanks 🤩

@dmeloTV Ай бұрын

Thanks for the video, thats exactly the comparison I wanted to see

@JosephMartin Ай бұрын

Glad it was helpful!

@mas_kentungs2 4 ай бұрын

I'm still confused, i want to take photos of plane, and i want to do night spotting, which camera that is good for night photography?

@JosephMartin 3 ай бұрын

Full-frame cameras like the Canon R6 generally boast better low-light performance because the sensor is bigger and can gather more light. It will also be important for you to have a lens that’s got a wide aperture (f/1.8 or below) if you want the cleanest shots without sacrificing the shutter speed necessary to capture a moving plane without blur

@mas_kentungs2 3 ай бұрын

@@JosephMartin umm i forgot to mentioning R10 or R5, which one is the best for what i have been explained?

@JosephMartin 3 ай бұрын

@mas_kentungs2 the R10 and R50 have equal low light performance because their sensors are exactly the same, though you may benefit from the greater burst ability of the R10 if the planes are moving fast :)

@mas_kentungs2 3 ай бұрын

@@JosephMartin thank you!

@johnwinter6061 Ай бұрын

You've chosen one of the most challenging situations. That means expensive gear for the best results. Full frame usually better in low light.

@ConnerJohn 4 ай бұрын

Great comparison dude!

@Cowlong21 3 ай бұрын

Just subscribed, this was the most useful video and it really helped me make my decision.

@JosephMartin 3 ай бұрын

so glad I could help! thanks for the sub 🙌

@johnwinter6061 Ай бұрын

I've added a cheap full 'skin' from AliExpress to my R50. Solved the too small body issue. Can come with the RF-S 18-45 kit lens. That's 27 wide in FF. IQ? Not sure. The advantages of the R10 were not important to me. Eg Video not of importance to me. The R50 is the later release. I'm sure that gave it later / better software and focus system. Consider the RF 24-240 for both APS-C and FF bodies! (My main camera is the RP. )

@Alex_Roma87 Ай бұрын

Hi, Can you tell me please how it's RP overall? I cannot decide what to buy, R50 or R10 because i have a discount of almost 200euros versus RP. My first decision was the EOS RP. Thanks. 🙏

@johnwinter6061 Ай бұрын

@@Alex_Roma87 The short answer is it depends on what you want to do. Eg Video v shot. Subject matter. Time available to take shots. Got the RP 2 years. Love it despite some shortcomings that don't worry / bother me at all. FF at a reasonable price was the main attraction. Mirrorless had me close to the line and the RF 24-240 pushed me over the line. Got RP + RF 24-240 zoom kit for about 25% off RRP. Great one lens travel grab shot camera - which is what I mostly do. Bought the R50 a few months ago. Haven't done much with it. Bought it for the odd long distance shot. Got the R50 with the 18-45 lens for a bit less than RRP for the body alone. There's also a twin lens kit. Don't know much about the lenses. I added my existing RF 100-400 to the R50. Price That price difference seems about right. (Same for Australia where I am). Unless you shop around for kits (body + lens) being discounted. They come up. You might get some tax / duty free off if you are travelling overseas (We can buy up to 30 days in advance at any shop and get our 10% GST back). Don't buy overseas. (Within EU might be Ok - don't know). EBAY, airport or otherwise. Many issues. Watch out for locals selling 'grey import' models. Overseas ones not covered by local manufacturer warranties. FF (eg RP) v APS-C (eg R50 and R10) Heaps of videos everywhere on that argument. What used to apply to mirrored DSLRs is pretty much history for mirrorless. The gap has decreased considerably and there is now a blurring between them. Bit like 6 cylinder car v 4 cylinder cars. Depends upon specs! Remember F1 are 4 cylinder and maybe 2000cc ? I think all R series Canon bodies do in camera lens corrections for jpegs. (Think it's auto detect lens. Otherwise just go into setup.) The IQ is great straight out of the camera. Video RP is not really in the race. R10 seems to be popular. R50 has some later technology v R10. Not my area of expertise for more comment. Photo I chose R50 as my second / occasional camera for long shots with RF 100-400 For photos, it has later / better technology than v R10. Some of it's better than the RP! I could have got the R10 body only, discounted for same price, but for me and what I do, the R50 was better. Generally a full frame will be better than APS-C. But that's now changing too. There's a bit of blurring. Just look at prices. Some APS-C bodies are dearer than the lower end of FF bodies! APS-C used to mean much cheaper lenses. With mirrorless, that's changing too. Especially Canon RF 24-240 and RF100-400 (I have both). Those compete with mirrored APS-C lenses on both price and IQ despite being FF lenses. (It's cheaper to make mirrorless lenses than mirrored lenses of the same specs.) Gives you an option to add a FF body later on and keep the lenses! I had a Canon 600D (18MP APS-C) with Tamron 18-270 for 10 years. Loved it. At 50mm, it was better than the Canon 50mm 'prime' I bought (cheap version - not L version). Compared that with the RP + 24-240 before buying the RP. The RP (26MP FF) kit won hands down on all fronts. Eg A crop from the RP was better than my old kit at 270 on APS-C (=400+mm equivalent) ! Yes, I love my RP kit. It's my 'go to'. Maybe just as much because I have the 24-240 'permanently' attached. Regardless, it still comes down to what you want to do. Eg My RP + 24-240 is excellent for travel grab shots. It does a lot more too. If you want wildlife, then it's probably an APS-C with high continuous shot rate + 100-400/500 zoom or 600 fixed for that. Not my area. Try Simon d'Entremont. Lenses Currently Canon does not allow third party R series lenses. That may change. The three I have are very reasonably priced for what they are. There's a 24-105 (plain and L series?) I think - know nothing about them. Too short for me! Otherwise, hmm . . . People rave about Canon L series lenses. Some cost more than a car! Ok if it's your job with tax deduction. Otherwise just for the annual holiday its not viable. Canon have a reasonable range of RF (FF) lens options. The RF-S (APS-C) range was a bit scant but seems to now be expanding. RF and RF-S have the same mount etc. So, like me, you can use an RF on an APS-C body. (Yeah, I hear the purists yelling foul!) And finally The person behind the camera. Doesn't matter what you get if you don't have an eye for what makes a great shot. Eg You can have the best portrait lens wide open for high isolation, but still take a dud. Best portraits tell a story. Just look at Time and National Geographic. Don't need a portrait lens for those. My award winner (best in show all categories) portrait was taken on 35mm film with a Ricoh 55mm lens! It was a grab shot in the street! I've seen some great shots from phone cameras too. They've come a LONG way and eliminated the old compact digitals. Ask your shop if they have demo models you can try out. Mine lets me take it out of the shop and into the street for 10-15 minutes. I took my own APS-C gear and two memory cards so I could analyze the shots after on a 'same shot' basis. Comparing online ones is a good start, but you are restricted by the website resolution restrictions and your screen resolution. With your own shots you can print off (another resolution issue - use highest DPI!) parts and compare. If you do go for the R50, make sure you buy a cheap 'skin' (eg AliExpress) for it. It's just too small to grip properly. I found myself accidently hitting buttons. The skin fixed that. For me, it's still the RP for IQ.

@johnwinter6061 Ай бұрын

@@Alex_Roma87 I did. I can's see it! Let me know.

@johnwinter6061 Ай бұрын

@@Alex_Roma87 Forgot Low light / flash RP has no flash. It has shot shoe for Canon Speedlight. Not cheap. Bought one and highly impressed with the depth of filed with same exposure. Great! But you may not need flash. FF is better than APS-C in low light. I've found shots inside a house acceptable without flash. R50 has a sort of hot shoe It's Canon's new style. You need an adapter depending upon what you use it for! But it does have a built in flash. Nothing serious but if it's like my old 600D, it's good for daylight shadow fill-in , etc at 10-15' or 1 to 5 metres.

@johnwinter6061 Ай бұрын

Ah . . I see it now. All good.

@ConnerJohn 4 ай бұрын

no 4k 60 is a deal breaker for me

@JosephMartin 4 ай бұрын

It definitely banishes the R50 to the hobbyist realm