Why Was King James II So Unpopular?

[@paganseashellies]

I've seen this whole series several times and I love it. But I have to say that it amuses me to see Earl Spencer (Princess Diana's brother!!!) on there offering commentary as simply Charles Spencer; author. It tickles me, and I'm impressed with the wealth of his knowledge on the topic.

[@St.Linguini_of_Pesto]

Unsurprising that he is so knowledgeable of this era.. the events of the late 17th century involved some of the Spencer ancestry, after all.

[@St.Linguini_of_Pesto]

It's very nice to see Charles Spencer is keeping busy.

[@onagaali2024]

Great oratory narrators and skit taking us back in time. Good video.

[@karenishness1]

A taste of freedom even once brings a craving forevermore.

[@moraesneto9508]

What do you mean?

[@davidryan0808]

He was rather awesome in his early years...feel sorry for him really he didn't keep his battle smarts up. I like this period of history because m was jumping about like mad hatters:) all rather awesome indeed like this vid..great this is up :)

[@judyadams8409]

Lol 0 plop

[@kittys.2870]

James the First of Scotland and Joan de Beaufort are my 18th great grandparents

[@jakubkuzminski5670]

Super film

[@onagaali2024]

Kate Williams has rhotacism just like Helena Bonham Carter. I think how they talk is cute.

[@unicorngirl4462]

He was the one who executed Archibald Campbell ninth Earl of Argyll, the hereditary chief of clan campbell in June 30th, of 1685,

[@moraesneto9508]

In order for Jaime II to have kept his throne during the glorious revolution, he could have adopted a more balanced and sensitive approach to the concerns of the people and parliament. Here are some things he could have done: 1. ** Religious tolerance in a smoother way: ** Instead of trying to impose Catholicism abruptly, Jaime could have gradually worked to promote religious tolerance, respecting predominant Protestant beliefs. He could have shown more empathy and built confidence, which would have diminished resistance to his government. 2. ** Collaboration with Parliament: ** Instead of trying to rule alone, Jaime could have sought a more open dialogue with Parliament. He could have accepted some concessions, showing that he was willing to work together for the sake of the country, which would have strengthened his position. 3. ** Construction of Political Bridges: ** Jaime could have struggled more to create alliances with moderate political figures, both Catholic and Protestant. Upon hearing and meeting the concerns of these groups, he could have avoided the isolation and growing opposition that led to their fall. 4. ** Moderate use of force: ** Instead of resorting to military force to silence the opposition, Jaime could have opted for more peaceful and conciliatory solutions. A less oppressive government would have generated less fear and resistance, and could have preserved its authority without the need for repression. 5. ** Graduative reforms: ** Instead of trying to impose rapid and drastic changes, Jaime could have introduced reforms more gradually, involving the people and parliament in decisions. This most careful approach could have maintained popular support and avoided the feeling that he was ignoring the country's traditions. 6. This could have ensured the continuity of its lineage without causing so much division. Taking these attitudes, Jaime could have kept his throne, creating a more stable and accepted government, preserving the powers of the crown without generating the hostility that led to his deposition.

[@moraesneto9508]

James II of England made several strategic mistakes, which, according to Robert Greene's 48 Laws of Power, contributed to his fall during the Glorious Revolution. Here is an analysis of the main mistakes he made and how he could have prevented his deposition by applying these laws. Mistakes committed by James II according to the 48 Laws of Power: 1. Did not overshadow the master (Law 1: Never overshadow the master) Jaime tried to reverse the power balance policies implemented by his brother, Charles II, by trying to impose Catholicism and consolidate absolutism. This challenged the political balance and alienated Parliament, which felt threatened. If he had followed the example of Carlos, who ruled with more diplomacy, perhaps he could have maintained a more stable relationship with Parliament and the Protestants. 2. Failed to hide your intentions (Law 3: Hide your intentions) Jaime was explicit in his intentions to re-establish Catholicism and increase the power of the monarchy. By granting privileges to Catholics and weakening Protestant institutions, he caused alarm. If he had been more subtle and progressive in his reforms, he could have avoided the revolt. 3. Alienated his allies (Law 5: Become indispensable) Jaime removed potential allies, especially among Protestants, by favouring Catholics. He did not cultivate support in Parliament or among the military, which left him vulnerable. He should have built strategic alliances to become indispensable to his supporters. 4. Underestimated your enemies (Law 15: Completely crush your enemy) James underestimated the threat of William of Orange, allowing him to become a central figure in the opposition. Jaime was not decisive with his rivals and ended up losing the throne. He should have neutralised Guilherme before he became a real threat. 5. Offenced the wrong people (Law 19: Know who you are dealing with - don't offend the wrong person) Jaime alienated powerful figures in Parliament and the Anglican Church by trying to impose Catholicism. This resulted in the formation of an alliance against him. If he had better navigated religious sensitivities, he could have maintained enough support to govern. 6. He was indecisive and not daring (Law 28: Be bold) During Guilherme's invasion, Jaime was hesitant, which caused many of his allies to change sides. His lack of decisive action allowed Guilherme to gain support. Jaime should have acted quickly and strongly to prevent the opposition from gaining strength. 7. Exceeded the limits (Law 47: Don't exceed the mark you wanted; in victory, learn to stop) Jaime went too far in his attempts to impose Catholicism and increase royal power, without recognising the limits that Parliament and the people would accept. By pushing for more control, it generated massive opposition that resulted in its fall. If he had stopped before exceeding these limits, he could have kept power. 8. Did not use strategic surrender (Law 22: Use the tactic of surrender - turn weakness into power) When Guilherme consolidated his support, Jaime resisted militarily, without success. He should have used strategic surrender to negotiate better terms, turning his weakness into a position of power. 9. Failed to prepare the next move (Law 29: Plan until the end) Jaime was taken by surprise by Guilherme's invasion because he didn't have a long-term plan to deal with the opposition. If I had planned carefully, I could have avoided his fall. What James II could have done to keep the throne: 1. Follow the example of Charles II (Law 1: Never overshadow the master) Jaime could have followed a more diplomatic approach, as his brother Charles II did, balancing power between the monarchy and Parliament, avoiding an abrupt break with the established political balance. 2. Hide your intentions (Law 3: Hide your intentions) Jaime was very clear about his intentions to restore Catholicism. If he had been more discreet, acting gradually and less visible, he could have implemented his reforms without causing so much alarm. 3. Better control your image (Law 6: Attract attention at any price) James II could have worked on his public image to seem more neutral in relation to religious issues, attracting support and time necessary to consolidate his power. 4. Manipulate Protestant allies (Law 7: Make others work for you, but always keep the credit) By appointing strategic Protestant allies to important positions, James could have maintained an appearance of neutrality, while implementing his Catholic policies behind the scenes. 5. Neutralise William of Orange earlier (Law 15: Completely crush your enemy) Jaime should have acted quickly to neutralise the threat posed by William of Orange before he could gather support, preventing the invasion that resulted in the Glorious Revolution. 6. Maintain the support of key figures in Parliament (Law 19: Know who you are dealing with - do not offend the wrong person) Jaime should have maintained a better relationship with influential members of Parliament, avoiding alienating powerful figures by openly imposing Catholic policies. 7. Negotiate instead of fighting (Law 22: Use the tactic of surrender - turn weakness into power) Jaime could have negotiated with William and Parliament, accepting temporary concessions to maintain the throne, instead of trying to resist militarily. 8. Focus your forces on strategic allies (Law 23: Concentrate your forces) Instead of forcing reforms on many fronts, Jaime should have secured strong loyalties in key areas, such as the Army or Parliament, before expanding his policies. 9. Act with more decision (Law 28: Be bold) Jaime could have shown greater boldness and confidence during the invasion crisis, preventing his allies from deserting and dissuading his opponents. 10. Plan in advance (Law 29: Plan until the end) Jaime should have anticipated the opposition and better planned his actions to deal with William's threat, ensuring alliances and external support, such as from France. 11. Moderate your reforms (Law 47: Do not exceed the mark you have aimed for; in victory, learn to stop) If the scope of his reforms had been more moderate and limited, Jaime could have maintained Parliament's support and avoided causing a crisis. 12. Adapt to circumstances (Law 48: Stay adaptable) Jaime was inflexible in his attempt to impose Catholicism and absolutism. If he had been more adaptable, he could have made temporary concessions and resumed his plan later, at a more favourable time. Conclusion: James II of England made several mistakes by alienating his allies, underestimating his enemies and being inflexible in his intentions. If he had followed some of the 48 Laws of Power, he could have kept his throne by: • Hide your religious intentions, • Neutralise William of Orange earlier, • Form strategic alliances with powerful Protestants, • Demonstrate boldness in critical moments, • And adopt a more flexible and adaptable posture. These actions could have avoided the Glorious Revolution and consolidated his power as king.

[@glps6167]

"Chronicle" uploaded a video they did not produce under a changed title. And, of course, the Stuarts do not fit into a series of "medieval History Documentaries".

[@galaxian754]

I'm not really getting this. So James 2nd was the king, but they got rid of him and brought over a guy from Holland? Does that not break the royal assent? Is it ligitimate? I thought 'whos next in line' is a big issue?

[@kumaridesilva]

The person they brought over was married to the daughter of the British King, so Mary had a right to the throne. Mary, James ii’s daughter married her first cousin. Her husband’s mother was the son of king james ii’s sister. So there was that connection too

[@egparis18]

Eye-rolling for England.

[@Kubotahonda5]

Very very uncomfortable dresses those medieval 🏰 times , not only the clothes, but overall worst era to live those times

[@St.Linguini_of_Pesto]

Looks more comfortable than 6" heels.

[@SyriusStarMultimedia]

Taking perceived power from English monarchs made them more dangerous and powerful. It’s not like slavery and colonialism did not spread along with the sufferings born out of each. The only ones that like it are the English that do not suffer it.

[@ukemike1]

It's a bit surprising that a video entitled "Why Was King James II So Unpopular? " fails to mention Jeffreys and the Bloody Assizies that followed the Monmouth Rebellion.

[@NoName-us7wn]

I'm beginning to see why the u.s. passed a freedom of religion law.

[@51elephantchang]

James the 1st was not king of England in 1580 as erroneously claimed at 3.25.

[@BRAND0N...]

Who was then?

[@51elephantchang]

@@BRAND0N... Elizabeth the first was Queen obviously.

[@kittys.2870]

They are speaking of James STEWART of SCOTLAND

[@51elephantchang]

@@kittys.2870 Not what they said at 3.25

[@BarbieByMattel]

it looks like that same cartoon painting of issac newton but with a nicer wig instead of that goofy haircut he has

[@St.Linguini_of_Pesto]

That was probably considered the look at that time. Imho, it looks better than some man-buns I've seen.

[@BarbieByMattel]

@@St.Linguini_of_Pesto bro there are like only 2 cartoon pictures of issac newton in existence. he's basically the "jesus" of the heliocentrism religion. seriously google basically the only other one, he is a total G🤡🌎fball either way lol

[@dogue7338]

What boogles me is the concept of royalty... should every not every family be consider royalty

[@edwardiv1420]

What rubbish Monarchs. Disappointed in my descendants