Why we didn't buy the RF 70-200 2.8 and bought the EF version instead!

Why we didn't buy the RF 70-200 2.8 and bought the EF version instead!
Luts, Presets and Production contracts: sellfy.com/monkeypixels
Check out our Merch: sellfy.com/monkeypixels/merch/
Favorite plugins: motionvfx.sjv.io/c/2245172/614...
Where we get our youtube music: share.epidemicsound.com/DZFq8
Where we get our commercial music: geni.us/eA5k
Best High-Quality stock footage: geni.us/81lSWy4
Get the EF version on Amazon: geni.us/BAmLR94
Thanks for Belle for filming. Follow her on belinda.films
Our Gear to make Videos:
Zeapon Slider:
NA: geni.us/7zmg
EU: geni.us/sygPX
Main Camera: geni.us/FZ7XVx
B - Camera: geni.us/XEeOjut
Favorite lens for the C300III:
NA: geni.us/Vdg5f
EU: geni.us/IXLSv
Favorite macro lens: geni.us/kWhS
Favorite top handle:
EU: geni.us/A8tc5Lo
NA: geni.us/TmqB
Monitor mount:
EU: geni.us/vtGXo
NA: geni.us/s62Jb9x
Shotgun Mic for interviews:
EU: geni.us/rFPUA
NA: geni.us/d7EX
Shotgun Mic for the R5:
geni.us/PVYKhq
Windshield:
geni.us/hSXPf
Favorite monitor:
EU: geni.us/pB7X4Y
NA: geni.us/yUKpOJ
Best field recorder: geni.us/RVVlzqz
Awesome wireless mics: geni.us/hwqkU
Key light: geni.us/ECZs3cz
Easy to open softbox:
EU: geni.us/of3B
NA: geni.us/Mz9f
Pocket light:
NA: geni.us/KI4AC
EU: geni.us/v58LAEv
Gimbal: geni.us/pNXAAVF
Portable light:
EU: geni.us/7bMAjc
NA: geni.us/DJMt5
Softbox: geni.us/oV81
Best memory cards:
NA: geni.us/arI1R19
EU: geni.us/V94YM9
---------------------------------------------------
Follow us:
/ monkeypixels
/ belle_schoenberger
www.monkeypixels.com
/ monkeypixels

[@thecommish80]

I think the best thing about rf glass is that it brings down the price of ef glass.

[@damiencooper]

has it though? I think the EF 70-200 has been solid when it comes to pricing!

[@Soul_Visuals_Photography]

I disagree. Hasent.

[@thecommish80]

Monkeypixels Maybe not for new lenses but I feel like there are better deals on the used market now. Or maybe its just wishful thinking on my part.

[@jameskeener7251]

Nice.

[@the1trueluigi581]

I prefer the EF version as well for one reason...I prefer internal focusing! It's more reassuring.

[@doorsx111x]

A lot of other reviewers just blab how much better the RF is since they want Canon to send them stuff

[@GriffinConway]

The walk and talk vibe of this video was cool Damien! I agree with you on the versatility + zoom throw of the 70-200. Thanks for sharing bro!

[@mikewinburn]

Excellent presentation. Loved the blocking and location for m addition to the exposure choices.The lens info was equally well presented.

[@asherdavidson4635]

Thank you so much! The reason was given by YOU I never heard from somebody else. And because I'm looking for a lens for concert shooting - your opinion of zooming functionality made sense to me.

[@AustinRoss]

This was the deciding factor I have been looking for guys. Thanks!

[@oracleofvalerius]

Thanks. I got the EF version due to its versatility, I was tempted by the RF coolness but could never justify that 3K cost when just starting out. I did stump for the 2.8 version as everyone was telling me it’s sharp as hell and my god they’re right. Gorgeous and love the feel of the focus wheel that I can spin from 70 to 200 in a heart beat. Keep up the good work, counting the seconds till we’re out of lockdown and I can visit a zoo with this bad boy. All the best.

[@EugeneMaynard]

Excellent! You have confirmed my doubts without question!🙏🏾

[@thefilmpoets]

EF f/4 IS makes me happy. Small and beautiful.

[@mg3media]

What do you mainly use it for?

[@thefilmpoets]

@@mg3media We do weddings, so it's a good ceremony lens. But I really love it for travel along with a 16-36mm for wides.

[@mg3media]

@@thefilmpoets have you had any problems with it in low light?

[@thefilmpoets]

@@mg3media not really, but it's not a low light lens and the 2.8 isn't either. I'd rather bust out an 85mm 1.4 and 135 f/2. Or for travel just carry a small 50mm prime

[@QuayandChristine]

dude as your channel grows your production for your video also is going to the next level. keep it up man! looking forward to the next one

[@damiencooper]

Just wait until I can do only KZbin 😂

[@TizOnly1]

Great video. Production wise. Really like the style. The bike going through the alley while you were talking was a really dope shot. I already decided on EF over RF for basically everything for me at this point (I shoot R5/C70+Speedbooster), but still stuck around on the video bc it looked nice.

[@damiencooper]

haha, really surprised so many like the production quality so much as it was just pretty much last minute improvides :D But the scooter shot was cool!

[@njrivetelite]

I have the R5 & EOS-R I also went with the EF version of the 70-200 2.8 IS III It's a solid lens and will serve me for many years. I don't regret buying it over the RF version. Sure I like compact & light.. But.. I just really like the Tank of the EF version.. it a beautiful lens that works phenomenal

[@ryevdee6064]

Really glad you pointed this out, I love throwing zoom in video even, I have a feeling I'd miss how smooth it is on the EF vs all that fuss with the awkward & noisy zoom I see on the RF. When you tested did your Mics ever pick up the noise from it moving in and out?

[@santanistic]

Similar to you switching between EF & RF systems, the EF lens appeal more to me. The other benefit to EOS R & R5 is the ability to use the drop-in filter adapter allowing for a really coinvent spot when adjusting exposure via the ND.

[@MattBlakPhoto]

Thanks for this review.

[@77dris]

Here I am in 2022 and considering getting an R6 but the RF glass is stupidly priced and there are no third party lenses anymore. I had the EF 70-200 II for a while and it was mind blowingly good. I can't imagine the RF being much better thought the form factor is fantastic. I can't afford $4000 for a lens though when I can get an EF MkIII version for half that price.

[@77dris]

Update: December 2022 I got the R6 Mark II and the EF 70-200 2.8 III and WOW! To say this combo is phenomenal for hockey is an understatement! It also cost $1300 cdn less than the RF version.

[@chuck7415]

The vortex pattern in the two photos you showed in the beginning - that's from the lens correction. Use masking and color noise reduction to get rid of it, or just turn off correction if that's not a big deal to you. Sorry I only noticed because upon recently buying and using this lens (RF 2.8) and editing in post, I have noticed this happens a lot. So it's very fresh in my mind haha. Great video!

[@lilku6090]

Love the quality of this video. After watching this video I have decided to buy the the rf version, don’t like the short travel zoom ring with the Ef version I have, I prefer more precision while zooming. Also the size difference is huge I don’t bring my ef version out more than twice a year due to the size, and it seems the rf version have better corner sharpness and AF speed and stabilisation

[@damiencooper]

Good point. One reason I sold the EF version was I never brought it with me due to size

[@michaeloeser]

As someone who also shoots weddings the weight and size of the RF makes it the goto lens for me.

[@damiencooper]

Oh I bet it’s amazing for weddings

[@rabinkarki2690]

indeed needed video. I have EF version and I am happy with it. Great content as usual.

[@damiencooper]

It's an amazing lens!

[@meibing4912]

Makes sense. Got the RF myself and am happy with my purchase. Biggest drawback for me is that the EF takes extenders while the RF does not.

[@RichartAsia]

Excellent points...

[@loudandclearmedia]

Great points, Damian, especially since you articulated your specific use case so well into your decision. IMO that's really the biggest factor is how you will be using it. For me, it's rare that I use a 70-200 anyway, but when I do need it that's the only lens that will do. So, I'll always have one, and for me the RF version is the right choice just for the compactness of storage. It spends most of its time stored in the van anyway...might as well take up less space while it's doing that.

[@lovemycity420]

I’m hoping that I made the right decision, I just sold my ef F/4 usm II, for the Rf F/4! Great video and perspective! The throw was so smooth on the ef version

[@damiencooper]

haven't tested it yet. But it would be a concern. The lens is a lot smaller though

[@Soul_Visuals_Photography]

I recently got the RF. MY GOD ITS AMAZING.

[@Soul_Visuals_Photography]

I do agree the RF Is more difficult to rotate the zoom ring but a minor set back. I had the ef version and definitely don’t mis it

[@damiencooper]

absolutely agree. Unfortunately for us it wasn't just a minor inconvenience

[@B7RAIN_STUDIOS]

Same RF is much better lighter smaller just much better for my workflow because i use it on my R5 and red komodo which are RF so i don't need the EF.

[@ElBoyoElectronico]

I love the RF version too, it is my favorite lens by far :)

[@michaelballinger6419]

I'm actually buying the RF 70-200 F4 because it's so small and light. Weights a big deal for me though.

[@LSsuperior]

I’m happy with my EF 70-200mm 2.8L III USM ($2k). Use it on all my cameras. 5DSR, R5, and Sony A7sIII👍🏽 At this point the only RF lens I’d consider is the 28-70mm f/2 ... I’d still keep the EF 24-70 2.8 II for it’s versatility.

[@icanfly5964]

I’m happy with the RF version. Was worth the investment. The fact that it’s a telescopic lens did bother me a tiny bit at first, but come to think of it most of my other lenses were telescopic to begin with. At least we have options to choose from.

[@ariomstudios7366]

Great review David, have you tried to squeeze in an EFx2 teleconverter between the EF70-200mm and the EF/RF adapter? How do you reckon for that setup and its effects on AF and IQ?

[@samuell.hodgesjr.1577]

I just purchased the EF model. I didn't realize that the RF model would be cumbersome in keeping the subject in focus. I think that is a big factor when shooting sports and moving subjects.

[@hefter-film]

Thank you happy with my EF. Now more! 😉👍🏻

[@McTube2010]

Nice points. For your experience it’s the same for the 24-70? Especially about the ring movement during zoom

[@pcsphotographyvideography2556]

Awesome video!! Would love to see how you mix your audio for this video.

[@damiencooper]

Thanks man! I’m actually not happy with the audio quality at All 🙈

[@royottaway9434]

Totally agree , I much prefer EF version tracking a subject and keeping in frame with my thumb .

[@jameskeener7251]

I'm enjoying shooting with the R5. My EF 70-200 f/2.8 L III arrived four hours ago. And I just saw your video. It's nice to have my reasoning confirmed. Another factor for me is the dearth of RF glass between 200mm-400mm. The EF lenses in that range were some of the best telephotos for any system: 300mm f/4, 400mm f/5.6, 300mm f/2.8, 400mm f/2.8, 200-400mm f/4 with TC f/5.6, 400mm f/4 II DO (my favorite). I chose the EF lens because TCs can't be used with the RF 70-200 f/2.8, and there is nothing that can get me the extra stretch the EF system offers/offered that I want to use. Thanks for your very useful video. /s/A New Subscriber.

[@robertbohnaker9898]

Hi. Informative video. I’m coming to the same conclusion re: the Sony 200-600 . Internal zoom and extremely short throw between 200-600 for birding. That’s helps me thanks. 😊

[@RockyMaiviaMiami]

The biggest for me to ef glass in general is that canons adapters only work on ef glass. ND, Speedbooster, polarizer. Given the cost effective cameras from canon will be super 35. It is the way.

[@damiencooper]

also good point. That's what I meant with the RF mount not really being an advantage

[@Waywardastronaut]

Went with the ef on account of being able to use the 1.4/2x ef extender, rf -rf doesn’t pair up with the 70-200 for the extra reach. The extra turn on the rf is definitely a muscle memory learning curve.

[@RogerZoul]

Thanks for the video. A lot of people swear right and left that RF glass is way better than EF glass but you just sited one meaningful example where that is definitely not true. Of course, there are many who will see the weight savings and small size of the RF as big advantages and they would be correct also. It just depends, but it is not a complete washout.

[@sambowks]

I was eager to replace my EF with the RF 70-200 until I realised that it doesn’t work the the RF 2x extender. That is a huge problem. I hope a 2x extender is released that works with this lens.

[@joseregino5170]

Thank you for your insights. Its nice to have a real world opinion instead of an "influencer" trying to sell you something.

[@gappo1301]

Just got myself 70-200 Ef IS version:)

[@mothaphoto]

The ef 70-200 ii is nearly identical to the iii and can be had for around 1k used at the moment. That’s what I would get.

[@damiencooper]

Yeah I had that one for the longest time

[@TheVoyagerFilm]

@@damiencooper Hi guys! I argued with my DOP: tell me, please, what lens-ND did you use on the street? Thank you :)

[@damiencooper]

@@TheVoyagerFilm 28-70 at 2.0 with a 2-5 stop ND

[@paulgibbings9553]

@@damiencooper I was thinking about the version ii, as my 20 year old Sigma can't keep up with my EOS R6, looking at reviews everyone seems to moan about it's performance when shooting into the light. I'm presently thinking the Sigma sport version presents the most bang for the buck, but it does seem rather heavy. I'm waiting for stock in the UK at the moment as no camera shop appears to have any at the moment. At less than half the price of the RF version it does seem a (relative) bargain.

[@jamescarlos8642]

As ef 70-200mm f2.8 lens Is there any difference between mark ii vs mark iii version

[@vincenzoiacovoni]

not to mention the dirt that sucks in the RF version , another problem for those who use it for sports in outdoor places

[@KBProduction1988]

You are amazing bro!!

[@damiencooper]

thanks man! :)

[@The_Therapeutic_Architect]

I love my EF 70-200 4L USM just fine!

[@coach_yo]

Which version EF were you using? I picked up a mk ii but want to know if its worth getting a mk iii

[@mountainparkselectric1688]

You are correct on the EF vs. RF mounts. I already have the perfect EF lenses and even some of my adapted lenses are nice to have. I also believe that it's nice to see that EF Glass prices are slowly coming down. I bought my first EF 70-200 L IS ii about 7 months ago and the price has come down quite a bit. I think it's a "Buyers Market" right now for EF Glass. Thank you Canon!!! AND thank you #Monkeypixels for such great content. Just this video alone will save so many people a lot of money. That's if they see this before they buy the 6 thousand dollar R5 that includes the lens... P.S. I love the composition in your scenes. Cheers!

[@edgarberber5556]

Been using the ef version for years. Weight has never been an issue.

[@PINACI]

WoW, thanks. I was thinking of selling my EF version to buy the RF version but think I will just stick with my EF lens until canon decide to make a better RF lens.

[@prakashjokhe6654]

आभार बहोत खुब और अच्छी बात बताई

[@JaredHoyman]

Thoughts on the 70-200 f4 RF version?

[@spelunkerd]

The main issue I have with my old EF glass is the noise of autofocus motors. It means you can't run and gun with mic on the camera.

[@vishkumar]

Hi I have Canon R5C. Does this Tamron 70-200 2.8 Auto Focus work in Video mode?

[@khanmahmood2690]

Really appreciated your review Monkeypixels of the EF vs RF 70-200mm f2.8. What I liked most is that you did not go with the heard mentality, that is a shinny new toy is better than old one. Anyone into cars would tell you that a non-turbo Ferrari V8 is far superior than than newer turbo V8 version because of the character of the non-turbo engine. Canon has produced some amazing lenses over the years and it is difficult to deliver improved performance whilst reducing the size, weight and keep cost manageable, especially during supply shortage of chips. I use a R6 but continue to use some of the best EF lenses because each lens has its own character that very few people know. My favourite lens is EF 85mm f1.2 L USM Mark II, EF 16-35mm f4 L IS USM and RF 28-70mm f2 L USM lens. Photography is not about taking the most sharpest picture with beautiful colour and bohkeh. You can do that using CGI. Photography is each individual's creative art, like Van Gough. No one is looking whether every brush stroke is perfect on the canvas but the elure the painting/photography leaves you behind that they hold in their memory for ever. Thanks.

[@Ebaggeronline]

Completely agree, the throw is way to long and takes to much effort instead of being able with two fingers to easily do every zoom possible and not missing anything

[@St8lker]

I understand your point of view... but for me tbe size and weight is more important. I switch from DSLR to EOS R6 and sell all my ef glasses and the adapter too....;-)

The difference between RF and EF is considerable. RF is a bit sharper, lighter and most importantly smaller. The price is $ 500 higher, but buying the EF version plus the adapter doesn't pay much. Larger size, weight and then the price is almost the same. The EF version is good for someone who already has it. For example, the RF 70-200mm F / 4 is incredibly luxurious.

[@njrivetelite]

When you are shooting figure skaters which shutter speed range do you find yourself most working with to keep them in focus? Shooting with the R5.. I personally stuck with the EF version.. people complain about weight.. but I like that it's built like a Tank.. it just feels well built. I'm sure the RF has it's advantages.. but I'm just not going to think about them and enjoy my EF 70-200 2.8 IS III.

[@CanoeToNewOrleans]

I shoot rodeos and there's a lot of dust. I don't want that dust in the lens. The internal focus of the EF is better in that regard.

[@yreyez]

Unrelated question here. When you had the C70, did you by any chance came across the idea of using the speed booster with the Canon R5 and sigma 18-35mm? I wondering weather you can gain the extra stop of light assuming you are using the R5 in crop mode and weather is worth the hassle.

[@damiencooper]

No. That would not make any sense at All. 🙈 You couldn’t even use the sigma with it either

[@ByStephenJones]

How does focus breathing compare?

[@thebrothers5871]

Man I have the 24 70 rf and 28 70 rf and now I think I need ef 70 200 after this video with my rig thanks mr cooper

[@chairminh]

If you could only keep the 24 70 or 28 70, which one would it be?

[@thebrothers5871]

The 28 70 f 2

[@MrDvaz]

Own both and looking sell the ef...heavier....longer....plus the rings it makes it very awkward ......besides that the RF is much better glass and the savings not that much!!!! and I have no problem with the extended part of the lens....plus a lot less space in my bag......

[@udo794]

is that Kurtinig (South Tyrol, Italy) in the background at 0:25? :-D

[@damiencooper]

Egna south tyrol ;) Good Eye

[@mredben]

The EF is better autofocus and faster?

[@quagmire321able]

I thought the RF version was a great design initially until I found out how Canon shrunk its length... a lens that telescopes when it zooms or focuses is always cumbersome, most of all if its a telephoto lens. I would have chosen the EF version too if I used telephoto zooms. Let me add one more advantage of using the EF version, you *can* use it on other bodies too in case if you have multiple systems or decide to... "move" to some other brand in the future, there are good adapters for EF to nearly anything now. ;-)

[@Carrillophotography]

So lenses aside. This was a beautifully aesthetic video

[@m11kan]

Good points but i would go with RF version just because mirror cameras will be history and RF version keeps its value much better.. also it is sharper as well.

[@rvboondocker2559]

It’s size and weight for me. Traveling is much easier. I can bring an extra lens. I don’t like the opening and closing. Eventually that constant vacuum will bring in dirt.

[@ALeoHughes]

Couldn't deal with the weight plus having it on a adapter

[@burritobrosvideos8060]

I bought the rf version. I love it. I liked the ef version but it was too large and heavy.

[@AnthonyTadle]

I’m w you heheheh. I was debating for the longest time

[@tobygroves2112]

YES! Thank you! I've just switched to mirrorless and, whilst I may replace/upgrade some of my EF lenses over time, I'll never sell my 70-200 II. I was horrified when I saw the extending barrel design of the RF version, it's just inferior, end of. I'm actually annoyed that they seem to have done this purely in the name of weight saving. These are professional grade lenses and professionals want the best quality, functionality and usability, regardless of weight. If good glass is too heavy for you, go use a smartphone :)

[@damiencooper]

Yes, they keep doing it. Same with the 15-35 too

[@ElBoyoElectronico]

Ich kann die Logik total nachvollziehen. Irgendwie fühlt sich das RF-Objektiv auch einfach zu teuer an... Mit welcher Kamera und welchem Objektiv habt ihr die Talking Head Parts aufgenommen? Sieht total cool und fresh aus! :)

[@damiencooper]

R5 mit 28-70 aufm RS2 ;). Scheint ja echt vielen zu gefallen. Hätte ich gar nicht gedacht ^^

[@six16th]

What are you using for your audio? It sounds great but I dont see a mic on you lol

[@damiencooper]

Tentacles under my shirt. I have a review of them online

[@creativegreats6924]

What about saving even more money and going sigma art 70-200ef ?

[@dimitrimoonlight]

It's also lack of ND filter adapter for video shooter, EF ver is better.

[@shadowHunter678]

Isn’t the EF lens automatically force your camera to switch to crop mode which reduce the megapixels?

[@damiencooper]

no, absolutely not

[@JimSefton]

Interesting summary. I am in the process of upgrading from my 5Dii and 5Diii to the R6 and was considering swapping the 70-200 2.8L Mkii to the RF version... considering the cost to do this I may just buy the EF converter instead and keep the EF version. From what I read though the EF shoots a lot slower (fps) than the RF version. Is that true?

[@aliaksandrafunk7955]

What did you end up doing? Did you stick with the EF? I’m considering R6 but only if EF lenses work fine on it

[@majorpayne0195]

RF glass is too expensive. From what I have watched, the build quality of EF glasses are better than RF glasses. If the control ring of the RF lens is a big seller for other, just buy the adapter with control ring.

[@kurtissutley1485]

Precisely. I use both an R5 and DSLRs in my photography. EF only for me.

[@Y2kphotos]

Just got the ef version ii in like new condition for $700 add $100 for the adapter.

[@Stefan1968ful]

You know what? I have the R5 and I did not buy yet even on RF lens. Why? Simply because the EF lenses perform so great on the R5 with adapter. And I use really a wide selection of EF glass, starting from the excellent Canon EF 16-35mm 4.0 via the Canon EF 70-200mm 2.8 II to the stellar Canon EF 600mm 4.0 III. Not to forget the Canon EF 100mm 2.8 Macro.

[@tossemanden]

Much better format for your videos. Two things: let the person who uses the equipment speak about it. I know it might be hard but you know your stuff so pass it on :-) also try and see if you can use the same camera for the talking head and for the b-roll. I think it would smooth out the look.

[@damiencooper]

Yeah. I always want her to be on front of the Camera 😉 As for the b-roll, I grab b-roll from shoots all over the world with whichever camera I have available at the time 😅 Glad you liked the video though!

[@GHOST-ig6bi]

What’s the point in an extra aperture blade with the RF which hardly makes any difference almost at all (9 v 8) as a selling point with portability if your performance is compromised ??? Go with the EF. Old is gold

[@medakidz6319]

What adapter did you use for the EF version.

[@damiencooper]

The canon one with the control ring

[@user-li3wt2ee9h]

2:14 what was she zooming at?

[@vedranb87]

By the way, are those adapters weather-sealed?

[@kirkdarling4120]

Yes, the adapters are weather-sealed.

[@iDirtyDan]

what camera cage are you using?

[@damiencooper]

smallrig. Tried several, like this one the most. I have a full rig video on my channel

[@ericbernardi9157]

This video was shot in the old downtown of Nice, France. I'm 100% sure :)

[@damiencooper]

Correct 😉

[@ankitpixelstudio8210]

Can I use Ef lens on EOS R Body

[@phill5917]

Yes just buy the RF to EF adapter for 100 bucks and you'll be fine.

[@ericcoen8894]

‘Cause you may want to consider that Canon x0.71 speedbooster

[@benjamin.kelley]

Selling my EF to buy a new EF...mine came wobbly and loose, would rather sell than get repaired.

[@henrikblomberg4793]

I think the opposite way: I have had my good old EF 70-200 /2.8 around twenty years and it has been repaired three times; still sharp and working well! I will not trade!

[@jamesholbienmendoza4354]

I bought the EF version cuz i don't have a RF camera

[@MATHEUSss]

como coño grabaste el audio de este video

[@minyuan86]

it is not that the RF version will physically be longer than the EF version when extended. You can easily assume the size of the RF to be similar to the EF from the beginning and your problem solve You can make a small lens physically bigger, but not the other way round. Secondly selling away the EF, renting a RF and buying back the EF... if you plan wisely... you dont even need to waste your money on these. The money you wasted can be easily make up for the cost difference. last the RF is a new lens and it is expected that zoom rings are tighter. basically your points are not valid

[@WOLFTICKVIDEOS]

It's not just a case of it's a new lens and the zoom ring is tighter, it has a completely different design. I'm not sure that even after a proper break in period that it will zoom as smooth and easy as internal zoom versions. In my experience on average it's the 70-200 lens that gets taken into the worst environmental conditions out of all of my lenses, so I'm not sure the new version will hold up long term as well. Not trying to step on a rant, but I thought it was worth mentioning. That's my two cents worth😁.

[@Burritosarebetterthantacos]

Easy. BMPCC6kPRO🔥

[@paulkane7636]

Tested an RF 70-200 for a basketball game with the R5 and R6.... Ended up going straight back to my EF70-200 ii Glad I can cross that lens off my want/need list..... Until they bring out an RF 70-200 without the external lens extension, I won't be going there...

[@martinekwall4671]

What did you experience with the RF version you didn’t like? I’m curious to know. I’m moving over to RF bit by bit.

[@paulkane7636]

@@martinekwall4671 It might be more tactile.. I just found the RF version was not as quick to zoom and maybe as balanced as the EF. Maybe over time, you would adapt to it - same as using the R5 and R6, instead of my 1Dxii's. Also for me, the quality difference didn't really make a difference. At the moment I have both the R5 and R6 and using all EF L lenses - from 16-35 thru to 600 f/4 ii. I'm sure some of my smaller focal length lenses will be replaced in the coming year or 2 with RF, but doubt the bigger glass will be.

[@martinekwall4671]

@@paulkane7636 Thanks for your answer : ) Cool lens collection! I have the RF 24-105 and I think I understand what you mean. It's more resistance in the zoom ring and lens package as it protrudes and I guess it's a design from Canon to not have it changing the zoom when pointing up or down. I do like the enclosed zoom lenses but don't be mistaken about the durability of the new RF lenses. My mentioned zoom lens went into the stream with EOS R - camera wet but the lens had no trace of moisture in it, had it sent to Canon repair. The lens was sharper than their benchmark lens. Lol!!

[@bornfree8487]

Is the presenter alluding to the fact the EF lens is par focal?