Why we use cube for strength Test instead of cylindrical | Interview Question

15 Mistake in House construction
• 15 Biggest Mistakes du...
15 Technical Term for civil Engineers
• 15 Technical Every civ...
Official Website Civil Site Visit
civilsitevisit...
Daily New Job Links
civilsitevisit...
WHATSAPP GROUP
chat.whatsapp....
chat.whatsapp....
chat.whatsapp....
( TELEGRAM GROUP FOR CIVIL ENGINEERS )
t.me/joinchat/...
t.me/joinchat/...
( TELEGRAM GROUP FOR JOB UPDTAE )
t.me/joinchat/...
( OUR OTHER KZbin CHANNEL )
1. For Job Update
/ @civilsitevisitjobsupd...
2. For Business Idea
/ @businesskaadda12
3.Civil Engineer Sharma Ji ( Basic of civil Engineering )
/ @civilsitengineer
4.Pareeksha ( Job & Exam Preparation )
/ @civilengineerintervie...
10 Most watched Video of ( CIVIL SITE VISIT )
1. Tile or marble Flooring
• मार्बल लगाये या टाइल |...
2.How to decrease construction cost of House
• घर बनाते समय इन 5 बातो...
3.Construction Cost of 1000 Sqft House
• Construction cost of 1...
4.Parapet Wall Cheap & Best Design
• Parapet wall two Best ...
5.Wall Dampness Treatment
• Wall Dampness Treatmen...
6.Marble or Tile Flooring
• Marble or Tile ? which...
7.Cracks in wall repair
• घर की दीवारों में क्रे...
8.Mistake in House Construction
• घर बनाते समय इन 8 बातो...
9.1000 sqft House Material Quantity
• 1000 sqft का घर बनाने ...
10.ACC Block Vs Red Brick
• 1000 sqft का घर बनाने ...
CONTACT DETAILS
✔Email Id for Business Enquiry - [e-mail]
✔Twitter: Vi...
✔Facebook Page: / 100041543491213
✔ LinkedIn: / rahul-sharma-66324a215
✔Instagram: / civil_site_visit
✔Tumblr: / civilsitevisit
For Business Enquiry
7006672812 (Note :- Only WhatsApp )
Disclaimer - This video is for educational purpose only. Copyright
Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is
made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news
reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use
permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of
fair use .
#civilengineeringbasic #Practicaltraining #siteengineerTips

[@ritikrajak5354]

Great job sir mene lockdown me aap ke 80% video dek dale or site ka bhi knowledge or experience mil gaya 🙏😊

[@ranjithalluri604]

Cylinder strength is 0.8 times of cube strength means cylinder is having 80percent of that cube strength but in this video u said opposite . But anyway thanks for sharing information.

[@himanshprajapati3679]

I think cube's strength is higher than cylinder's strength that why cube is 1.25 times of cylinder's bt he is saying that cylinder's strength is higher than cube bcos of increase length less frictional effect ...so confusing can u crearify this topic bro

[@harisabbasi5447]

@@himanshprajapati3679 cube strength is greater than cylinder strength .... yes in this video he said wrong . cube strength is 0.8 times higher than cylindrical strength

[@harisabbasi5447]

if u see european standard of concrete grades their written in clear . for e.g c30/37 , so c30 is cylinder which is equal to c37 cube strength .

[@himanshprajapati3679]

@@harisabbasi5447 Bhai civil ssc je ki preparation kar rahe ho

[@babuallrounder]

No problem bro

[@usmanmohammad9696]

Cylender strength is equal to 0.80 to 0.85 of Cube strength. matlab hamesha cylender ki strength cube strength se km hoti h...

[@k.rajashekarreddy9569]

That part of friction is not failing the specimen, it is infact resisting the failure and that frictional resistance is known as platen restraint which introduces shear stresses at top and bottom and as we move away from the platens this effect reduces. Since the slenderness ratio of cylinder is more this frictional resistance is less and therefore the strength of cylinder is less when compared to cube. You explained it wrong.

[@prashantpatel8871]

👍 right bro

[@islahuddin2249]

kya topic liya hai sir maza agaya best keep it up

[@bangalkids9596]

Sir i have a doubt on this vedio ..sir you have compare between cube and cylinder for getting best result of conpressive strentg ..sir we know that fck cylinder is equal to 0.8fck cube. 20% decrease in compressive strenght in cylinder with compare to cube.bcz of slenderness ratio of both shape.

[@civilsitevisit]

yes yu r right ....i speak wrong in flow sorry for that

[@bangalkids9596]

@@civilsitevisit its ok..

[@ssaleem1056]

Can I have ur num?

[@ssaleem1056]

Dil ki Awaaz

[@parunova]

👍well explained sir

[@civilsitevisit]

Thanks keep watching n saring

[@sajidmasoom2105]

Area badhane men to problem h lekin agr area kam kiya to...100mmx100mmx100mm...tab to force kam chiye hoga....to ye ku ni use kr skte

[@krazyharsh5040]

thanx for information

[@atifqazi6222]

Concrete cube ki strength cylinder ki strength se kitnee percent ziada rakhte hain kindly ACI II AASHTO yah ASTM se bAtye kindl

[@vinodprajapati5745]

Sir ji apne ak bhi topic ko clearly nhi samchaya

[@amarpc3532]

Bro can u explain about standard deviation of cube ka topic I sm getting lot of confusion

[@impossible5539]

My question is when cylindrical specimen and 100 mm cube give better result then why we don’t use them,

[@akshaykamath1190]

Simple. The code says us if u are using 20mm Agg we have to use 150 mm cube. If Agg size is less than 19mm we should use 100 mm cube. Since most of our construction we use 20mm agg , so we use 150 mm cube only. #CIVILBRAINS

[@santanumanna9118]

Plz one bbs of rcc and psc girder with full details

[@mohammedzaidalam1450]

Than why cubes are majory used for const. Work And If we use cylinder than it's exact comp. Strength doesn't carried out. Than how you said that it's Good.

[@civilsitevisit]

You easily get cylinder compression result perfect as compared to cube And we use cubes bcz itz formwork available easily n small waste of concrete n many more things

[@mohammedzaidalam1450]

@@civilsitevisit But in IS CODE 456-2000(P.no- 29 or 31) only said about cubes.

[@civilsitevisit]

Yes IS said 150*150 cube should use but according practically cylinder cube give best result because of no friction v

[@sgpfamilysgpfamily844]

Sir which code book mentioned the concrete cubes compressive strength .7 days 75%, 14 days .90%,28 days 99%.

[@ashishjaiswal453]

There is no code. Code only 28 days strengh fck +.825*standard deviation( as per IS code) Mean M25 tabhi pass hoga avg 29 ayega.

[@TheKunal333]

Good one himanshu.. 👌

[@civilsitevisit]

Thanks brother

[@civilsitevisit]

Keep watching

[@tausifengg]

cylinder strength is less than cube strength, ratio factor is 0.8 percent cylinder /cube .you define it is appropriate test of cylinder specimen. but when you will multiply any number to 0.8% it will decrease own value so that value will decrease in cylinder insist of increase. other point is welly explained .

[@homeanimations5786]

tnx sir 👌👌👌

[@harisabbasi5447]

0.8 times higher strength of cube rather than cylinder , kindly correct u mistake.

[@MandeepSingh-zm8wq]

Bhai cylendrical strength =0.85cube strength To cylendrical strength jada kese aagye Commonsence h

[@ashwinsinhgohil1046]

Uska kriteria. Kya he

[@susantamondal5814]

Wrong information cube strength is greatee than cylinder strength. Cube gives strength 1.25 time than cylinder mould.

[@SurajYadav-qo8sl]

Last me utla bta diye h

[@yashgupta6826]

Thank you bhaiya.....

[@civilsitevisit]

Keep watching n share

[@GauravKumar-lz3hk]

Sir standard 150*150 hi kyu hai 100*100 bhi to le skte thai standard

[@civilsitevisit]

shayad video ni dekhi apne usme btaya huya hai mene

[@MS-dc9tx]

Hello sir can you add subtitles or add English version of it..please Thanks

[@civilsitevisit]

Ok ofcourse brother i will add subtitles in my upcoming videos

[@mazharkalwal]

@@civilsitevisit Thanks

[@AyushKumar-ml4oj]

cylinder strength is0.8 times cube strength....... it means strength of cylinder will be less than that of cube. U told otherwise.

[@abhisekmedya4502]

Why is not used 100mm cube. I don't understand

[@mohdanas-ey3no]

Sir 100x100 cube is more strength why does not use it

[@civilsitevisit]

bcz for that you need machine that have more strength to break the cube n ...machine is so big n costly

[@mohdanas-ey3no]

Sir which is best square and circular I have a doubt please clarify my doubt

[@k.rajashekarreddy9569]

@@vkvivek1633 😅😅

[@k.rajashekarreddy9569]

Because smaller size cubes fail very quickly. The normal time for performing the test is 10min. If time taken is less than 10minutes more strength will be shown. You can opt smaller size cubes for compression test but then you should change the FOS value proportionately. For this reason BIS publishes IS codes so that a standard practice will be adopted throughout the country. If they are not followed and if the structure fails due to improper design then the engineer will be held responsible for not following the IS code.

[@usmanmohammad9696]

yar bhai please ap theoretical video na bnaye....agar cube size inncrease karenge to strength decrease hoti h.....size badha ne pr km load pr vo tut jayega....aur M20 strength kabhi bhi 28 days me 23 n/mm2 nahi a skti

[@NareshKumar-en5wc]

Sir, jab cylinders batter result deta hai to hum log cube kyo use karte hai???

[@civilsitevisit]

easy hota hai

[@nemichandbabal.7533]

Glt h Best results to cube hi deta h

[@nemichandbabal.7533]

Cylinder have .85 time strength of cube

[@k.rajashekarreddy9569]

@@nemichandbabal.7533 shayad aap soch rahe honge ki jo result ka numerical value jyada h vo acha result h. Lekin asal m aisa nahi h. Isko aisa samjo....aap M20 concrete tayar kar raha h, aur cube strength 28 days ke baad 19N/mm^2 aaya, aur cylinder strength aata h 15.5N/mm^2. Actual strength cylinder deta h i.e 15.5, but cube ne 19 diya, aur field m aap concrete ka strength 19 maanke construction shuru kiya. Concrete ka strength 15.5 hone ke baad bhi aap 19 maanke construction kar raha h which is overestimating the strength of your concrete which makes your structure weak. Though this effect in the field is compensated by using FOS both for material and load in LSM.

[@prashantpawar9595]

@@k.rajashekarreddy9569 well explained 🙏

[@dhirendraram8826]

Thanks

[@civilsitevisit]

Keep watching brother

[@israrahmad2092]

Thanks Sir... But why we test cube after 28 days??? Why we can not test cube on 29 days, 30 days, 31 days... I know after 28days cube achieve 99.9% strength... Laikin ye kaise pta Laga ki after 28 days cube 99.9% strength achieve kr leta hai..

[@civilsitevisit]

Yes lab test se brother

[@civilsitevisit]

Video soon on it

[@k.rajashekarreddy9569]

The simple answer to this question is just to save time. You can test even after 1 year for better results (infact after 1 year the creep coefficient is reduced by more than half of its 1 month value), but in field no one waits 1 year to occupy a structure after its construction. More often than not the structure will be loaded by the 15th day, but as per IS code it should be loaded after 28th day for best strength. In the end you are doing all these lab tests just to estimate the value that will be achieved on the field.

[@ashwinsinhgohil1046]

Sir cube fitting kese hoga sir

[@civilsitevisit]

Cube fitting brother ????

[@manojkumarmanjhi3528]

M 20 ke liye 230kyo lege

[@rohitranga36]

230 nhi 2.3 aaye ga sir

[@vns8724]

Matter is good but unnecessary lengthy explanation

[@civilsitevisit]

ok brother

[@mohammedimran1869]

Among 15x15cm and 10x10cm which cubes gives more strength

[@nobel12321]

15*15cm is less strength compare to 10*10cm

[@gobindguptaibc]

M20 =230 kyo le rahe h sir

[@mdtamanne231]

30*30*230= 207 kn easily ho jayega

[@bashakhan8212]

Sir 230 kya hai??

[@civilsitevisit]

Brother ...m20 liya ....hai 28 din bhad 23 kn/mm2 strength hoyegi ....edar ap 200 b le sakte ho jetna grafe houga utna he m 30 houga 300

[@usmanshabbir5678]

Compressive strengths of cylinders=0.8 x strength of cube, so cylinders give less strength. Your own concepts are bit shaky. And you have completely ignored the slenderness of cylinder

[@mohammedjiruwala2867]

10cm cube acche yaa 15cm.cube ?

[@civilsitevisit]

15

[@mohammedjiruwala2867]

What is the relation of coarse aggregate with th cube size ?

[@nobel12321]

Cube is more strong then cylinder

[@hellostranger9645]

You haven't mentioned why 100mm cubes aren't used in the site. Instead, you have said 100mm size of cubes gives more strength than 150mm size of cubes.

[@civilsitevisit]

but for 100 mm cube need big machine for test

[@hellostranger9645]

@@civilsitevisit we do not need a bigger machine for it. It's all about surface area for better accuracy.

[@vkvivek1633]

@civil site visit bur you said, for cube of bigger size we need bigger machine.

[@prashantpatel8871]

Bhai ne thoda galat bata diya

[@premshankarmahto1853]

No sir ,2000kn ka use hota hai

[@rajudasr]

2000kn CTM available in the maximum projects s! Not satisfactory!

[@rohitsahu5845]

jb friction ka baat aaya to acche se bataya kyun nhi

[@aniketmaurya2897]

apne to galat bata diya

[@rajibroyroy77]

I asked for a question but you did not replyed!! So, arrogant!! N blocked my messages!!

[@civilsitevisit]

Sorry for that brother ?? But which one ?

[@rajibroyroy77]

@@civilsitevisit thanks for atleast replying!!

[@civilsitevisit]

We replied olways

[@civilsitevisit]

What was your question

[@rajibroyroy77]

@@civilsitevisit , For , G+1 structure, zone5 ,assam. Beam size, column size, footing dimention n bar. Column n beam bar, stirrups n their gap between cc. Also is it good to provide beam bar out of column in both side??

[@dileepsinghrathore3654]

🙋

[@mdtamanne231]

all calculation mistake

[@vaibhavsharma1955]

Please delete this video its clearly misleading the concept sir