I actually like the fact that it looks very random from the outside, but when you stand on the center block it becomes a perfect circle. I really like chaotic designs like this and having them come together so beautifully is wonderful. I must build this in my hardcore world!
@squibble1117 ай бұрын
ill post the schematic of both the world and the armor stand tols in the schem channel in my discord, if you want to take it, or possibly make your own (if you have a bigger gradient)
@kr1v7 ай бұрын
@@squibble111 how would you get a bigger gradient? Isn't 5 glass blocks the max?
@mystik_owl7 ай бұрын
@@kr1vthere are FAR more permutations than just these 96
@sebastiangrau84097 ай бұрын
@@kr1v you could switch between more colors. He didn't include the values or brown. You could also reuse colors in your gradient, or do something crazy with mixing 3 colors at once
@eshleyyy7 ай бұрын
@@squibble111 I was thinking of making a muuuuch bigger circle for one of the farms im cooking and I was already thinking id have to make the datapack from scratch, but ill gladly take and modify yours, thanks!
@OrigamiMarie7 ай бұрын
I have never watched your channel before, but I'm sold on "baking tutorial for a cake you'll never bake". The pair of rings thumbnail was pretty great too (though a rainbow beacon thumbnail would have done the trick quite well).
@squibble1117 ай бұрын
going rainbow beacon would have been a nice throwback to the first video, woulda looked cool. though im glad i went with this, youtube seems to like it
@OrigamiMarie7 ай бұрын
@@squibble111 it definitely creates the contrary assertion that brings in the clicks. But also, you deliver on it!
@ChibiKagura7 ай бұрын
@@squibble111 yeah, i like that simple and technical thumbnail so it really got my attention
@alexo_pog7 ай бұрын
@@squibble111the thumbnail definitely pulled me in from the main page so i say its working
@acookie75487 ай бұрын
i probab;y wouldnt have watched if it was just a tutorial onb how to do that. ig why i clicked is the why behind the given diagrams. good video
@PCHSwS7 ай бұрын
I love designs that look completely random from most perspectives until you stand in the right spot and suddenly it makes sense... I am contemplating trying to incorporate this into something I can build on our SMP now :D
@Kaadjoisanavaliwithtoomuchtime7 ай бұрын
its like those pictures made out of lots of hanging objects. they are so cool!
@kipu447 ай бұрын
copy pasta 😜 accidental?
@PCHSwS7 ай бұрын
@@kipu44 oh my god, two people that have a similar opinion! How could that happen??? Drama!!
@PCHSwS7 ай бұрын
@@Kaadjoisanavaliwithtoomuchtimeyou mean like Squibble's perspective art? :D kzbin.info/www/bejne/iIalmGdngLqmaKssi=pMjevp67jfdVtPc8
@glompert73907 ай бұрын
@@kipu44OH MY GOD, PEOPLE HAVE THE SAME OPINION??? HOW WILD!!!
@Frozen_Hope6 ай бұрын
Gives the same vibe as those art pieces that are loads of bits on strings but forms a coherent picture when viewed at a specific angle
@CraftyMasterman7 ай бұрын
this blew my mind
@LimolaGaming7 ай бұрын
omg it's crafty
@aspidinton7 ай бұрын
blows up pancakes with mind
@JasminUwU7 ай бұрын
Dirt blocks have low explosion resistance, so that makes sense
@squibble1117 ай бұрын
omg its crafter counter
@lucashu12477 ай бұрын
cop flop > crafty counter
@daireks7 ай бұрын
i assumed the problem was that you couldn't place beacons next to each other or something lmao 😭 so, when you explained that it was actually that the spacing was uneven i thought it was a bit silly. BUT!!! i also completely understand the fun in solving random small problems like this so i quite enjoyed watching haha
@artyfarty99changingtohoiii787 ай бұрын
same 😅
@painovoimaton7 ай бұрын
Same here! Turns out it was a very neat perspective puzzle.
@Dezloxe7 ай бұрын
Looks considerably better from the inside than outside, maybe thats it.
@kipu447 ай бұрын
Like the Tardis. 😁
@MichaelPohoreski7 ай бұрын
Title is partially clickbait. People assume, and rightly so, that a perfect circle refers to *world space* beacon placement when the author is talking about beacons in *screen space* (when looking up.)
@widget59637 ай бұрын
@@MichaelPohoreski Yeah I was kinda expecting something like finding a best-fit radius for a 96-gon that's still fully loaded at once on a standard server. This was kinda neat anyway though.
@milkflys5 ай бұрын
you could probably consider how it'd look from the outside when deciding how much to space out the beacons and compromise a little bit on the size consistency without it mattering too much
@wackid23704 ай бұрын
@@MichaelPohoreskiwell yeah people should know that's impossible in a cube grid game
@the_ant_guy7 ай бұрын
It's like drawing an infinitely large 96-gon centered at (0,0), then drawing a line from the center to all 96 corners, then getting the minimum integer coordinates on that line outside a defined radius around (0,0)
@HEHEHEIAMASUPAHSTARSAGA7 ай бұрын
The integer coordinates can only approximately touch the lines, cause most of the lines have irrational slopes, which means they never exactly hit any grid points except (0, 0)
@adnzip81987 ай бұрын
doesn't even have to be infinitely large, it can just be big enough that the beacons all fit inside. There's definitely a way to automate this
@nddragoon7 ай бұрын
@@HEHEHEIAMASUPAHSTARSAGA for 96ths of a circle i think a pretty decent portion if not most slopes are rational, still, you can just try to find the closest it gets to a block center within the specified radius
@-minushyphen1two3797 ай бұрын
@@HEHEHEIAMASUPAHSTARSAGAAlthough they do get arbitrarily close, if you go out far enough
@HEHEHEIAMASUPAHSTARSAGA7 ай бұрын
@@nddragoon I plugged the values into wolframalpha and it seems like all the slopes are irrational except the cardinal directions and diagonals (so 88 out of 96 are irrational). Though you can get arbitrarily close to any slope, it might require you to go out too far and make the beacon beam appear too small. It's an interesting question what the maximum allowed radius should be in order to make the effect look (subjectively) the best
@SimplexonYt7 ай бұрын
you actually found a solution for the problem im trying to solve since half a year
@squibble1117 ай бұрын
congratulations on being the single member of the uninentionally targeted audience
@itripleo57807 ай бұрын
It can easily be done with some trig tho
@sluggy17397 ай бұрын
@@itripleo5780nerd
@drippylad39737 ай бұрын
@@itripleo5780 Hush, mathematics graduate
@RubiksCubeNerd37 ай бұрын
Do the trig and get us a graph of it @@itripleo5780
@grungko7 ай бұрын
i did a rainbow beacon in the past and wanted to make it a circle. It didn't look good due to the gaps between the beams as you explained, but i said it was acceptable since it was a single player world and no one would see this lol. I actually might reload this world and fix this rainbow beacon, to thank you for this video !
@onebacon_7 ай бұрын
NOOOO sqrt 2 stikes again... disgusting irrationals. we must embrace hexagons
@Faroshkas7 ай бұрын
Hexagons, embeded with sqrts(3) all over the place...
@gallium-gonzollium7 ай бұрын
@@Faroshkasb- but hexagons are the bestagons..
@WindsorMason7 ай бұрын
@@gallium-gonzollium even the bestagons betray us
@nartoomeon93787 ай бұрын
sqrt 5 : (sad)
@dagurtheone39697 ай бұрын
@@nartoomeon9378golden ratio!! :3 pentagons :333
@ai-spacedestructor7 ай бұрын
so the conclusion is that warehouse style is the best approach to almost anything.
@matchstick333 ай бұрын
I get the vibe that you have a passionate nerd rant (/pos) to go on about this, and I have never heard of this concept before and an so intrigued, care to explain? lmao
@ai-spacedestructor3 ай бұрын
@@matchstick33 not really a rant, its just i find there is a specific style of doing things i always fall back to and maybe thats because im a really ptractical person who doesnt do any decorative stuff, so it 100% only has the functionality it needs to and nothing else, which i tend to describe as "warehouse", "factory" or "industrial" style. there isnt really a big thing behind it, also even if there was. its so long ago that i saw this video that i would probably not remember what my thought was anyways.
@DogBat7 ай бұрын
3:24 that is actually gorgeous It looks like a star
@CNSninja7 ай бұрын
I feel like this kind of thing could almost be a numberphile video. This is a really cool lesson in perspective and why the idea of "perfection" is actually very subjective. Have you ever seen one of those sculptures that looks like a big chunk of nonsense, but shining a light on one side reveals that it casts a perfect shadow in the shape of a familiar object, and then shining a light at it from another angle casts a different shadow of a different familiar object? It's a fun way of playing with perspective. This video reminded me so much of that sort of thing. The way the circle looks careless and messy from almost any angle until you stand at the middle of the circle and it all organizes itself almost as if by magic, is genuinely an awesome thing to see play out. I love anything that can illustrate the extent to which perception can affected shape your ideas about "reality."
@NitroLemons3 ай бұрын
Absolutely agree. The subjectivity of perspective is a fascinating topic in general, and one that spans multiple fields of study
@datengineer21747 ай бұрын
You know had you NOT pointed out the difference in spacing I might never have noticed but now its forever going to torture me. Thank god this video also handily fixes the issue you just pointed out.
@akkiruksavage5547 ай бұрын
So excited this video has inspired my next two weeks of Minecraft obsession. I made a bunch of farms for beacons as my last project and then kinda stopped playing a few months back. Now I know what to do with all those beacons
@_wetmath_7 ай бұрын
this is quite interesting. and it may be possible to calculate and assign a score to different possible beacon placements based on 1. how close the of the beacon block is to the ideal angle line, and 2. how wide the apparent beacon beam is relative to the other beacon beams this is worth investigating, I'll have a look into it myself
@squibble1117 ай бұрын
Ooh, that would be really cool to design a program to do that! if you do come up with sometihing please do let me know on the discord server
@ClaraDeLemon7 ай бұрын
Assigning scores would be a great solution instead of brute forcing! For closeness to the ideal line, it should decrease with distance, as differences in horizontal gaps would not be as noticeable at large distances I think. And for calculating apparent wideness vs other beams, you would need to know their sizes first to compare, which would make it recursive and weird. I think if you instead swap that for "distance to center", you would get the same effect, as beam width scales with radius! Really neat math problem overall, I wonder if there could be a formula that gives a more straight answer than just computing all the values and picking the best
@JPK3147 ай бұрын
@@ClaraDeLemonThis leads to a diophantine equation which is unfortunately NP-hard to solve in general. However, optimization isn't too hard via a branch / prune approach, and with this particular problem you can find good bounds fairly easily that exclude all but a small number of possibilities that can be easily checked
@ClaraDeLemon7 ай бұрын
@@JPK314 It wouldn't be a diophantine equation, as the slopes of the straight lines are all irrational, and even then you dont want to find exact solutions, you want to find approximations, which is much easier to do than finding integer sols.
@schwingedeshaehers3 ай бұрын
@@squibble111sry for the ping, but has someone come up with something? if not, i will try something, but first want to know, that it isn't solved yet
@potaatobaked70137 ай бұрын
This is really cool! The method you used very much reminds me of ray marching, which is typically used in rendering. It would only take a small tweak to the ray marching algorithm to turn it into a tool that does this automatically.
@squibble1117 ай бұрын
Oh yeah absolutely. Something I could try is spawning a shulker on each site and since shulkers snap to blocks, I can easily find the closest point to the center of the shulker
@tverdyznaqs7 ай бұрын
I feel like there's a maths dessertation somewhere in there. Like you just sort of brute forced this problem with a rotating armor-stand but I bet if an actual mathematician took a crack at it they would probably be able to deduce some sort of formula that approximates a circle on a square grid in this specific way. That's what fascinates me about yall redstoneheads, sometimes you guys just end up doing incredible maths recreationally and I think there's something quite pure and wholesome about that :3
@flamekid5747 ай бұрын
An interesting problem and a genius solution. You explained it all really well, kept it interesting, and the result was awesome (the warehouse light effect was a really nice touch). Great video all round!
@squibble1117 ай бұрын
Thank you !
@ЗинаидаЛеонова-ю5у7 ай бұрын
What I learned instead is that no two men's OCD is the same
@TheTrueMichael7 ай бұрын
This was... Incredible. I'd love a block-by-block tutorial on how to build this exact setup (for those of us not savvy with commandblocks :)) and I already have a plan on where to include it, but I totally get if you want this to be a ”figure it out if you can, this was my project and i want it to stay that way” thing. This felt really cool and informative and for the first ever video I've watched from you, you gained another sub
@squibble1117 ай бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it! Theres a WDL for everything in the discord, and you can modify things to how you please. Theres also certain programs being used in the server so you could ask around if you want to use a computer to generate things instead.
@michael23b7 ай бұрын
That’s awesome. While it wouldn’t be perfect, I think it might also be cool to simply increase the “thickness” of the circle, to have more beacons at each turn covering the gaps. Edit: actually this is a stupid idea cause you’d still have the same visible gaps between some of them unless it was extremely thick
@vulpesinculta34787 ай бұрын
Perhaps if it is layered thrice? Though maybe it would need more.
@michael23b7 ай бұрын
@@vulpesinculta3478 to efficiently cover the gaps even more I think he would just need to plot more points the same way he did, but at a smaller turning increment
@rtrichter7 ай бұрын
to increase the desnity you would have to increase the number of turns in the circle. Say you triple the number of turns, then you find 3 spots for each color (or you could have the colors repeat three times its up to the builder really). You would probably need a bigger radius to fit all of these beacons but I think this would increase the density better than making it thicker would.
@martinshoosterman7 ай бұрын
@@rtrichterincreasing the number of turns would cause beacons to need to be placed even further to find ideal spots for them. While layering the beacons wouldn't have much variation in distance.
@rtrichter7 ай бұрын
@@martinshoosterman layering the beacons at the same rotations wouldn't have any effect. Additionally layering them would require more distance as well. You need to find a second point along that ray that is close to an integer coordinate. When you stand in the middle that coordinate will just be behind the first beam (and since its farther away it will be smaller and completely invisible from the center). Layering them at a higher frequency decreases the distance between beams and therefore "covering the gaps" which is what OPs intention sounds like.
@partiallypeculiar45457 ай бұрын
You've made something incredibly epic here. I immediately recognized the Smile Rancher ruin music too so that's awesome as well
@matth86177 ай бұрын
I really like this style of video where you build something useful or fun and explain it. Tbh I couldn’t care less about how quickly you could destroy a hoe but would watch so much content if you explaining things like this or like the anvil launcher that was one of your first videos. More practical mechanisms, redstone or not, are far more interesting to watch, at least for me
@GlossyPigeon4 ай бұрын
It’s an anamorphic piece of art really. You’ve overcome a technical limitation to create something circular in a square world.
@adamhayes46917 ай бұрын
I always love seeing one of your videos come out. They’re always so unique to most other people’s. And you explain things so well. You’ve come a long way since before you even had one thousand subscribers, not that long ago, but you’re still just as entertaining, if not more
@squibble1117 ай бұрын
Thank you for the compliment. I appreciate you having been here since then, the channel's definitely come a long way
@Autumn-Leafeon4 ай бұрын
I really like how it looks like you could put in a natural path to travel to the inside/outside of the circle, too, which I really like.
@kolamostic7 ай бұрын
I saw the title of this video and expected some sort of "Wifies" explanation type thing, and I don't usually get interested in those types of videos, however, I was really interested in your video by the way you conveyed things. You and Gneiss Name could be a good, underrated Minecraft duo, you earned a new subscriber.
@squibble1117 ай бұрын
Thank you, im honored to be batched into the same group as the great gneiss name
@Mirolp77 ай бұрын
i like your calmness, a lot of Minecraft content creators are so over exaggerating. But you Sir, you are just doing your thing and its interesting to watch
@happysmilesworldandgames87552 ай бұрын
7:56 "but, *in the end* ..."
@гксгкАй бұрын
it doesn't even matter...
@Whenpigfly6667 ай бұрын
Gotta love how the perfect circle looks like a starting position for Conway's Game of Life.
@Cooly-noobАй бұрын
This is a very smart and accurate solution to the problem. I have already built a beacon circle before, but i haven't thought about this problem.
@maxsam54987 ай бұрын
I’d recognize that music from anywhere It tickles my brain with nostalgia
@seulseulgom13 күн бұрын
the second u faced the camera upwards, i got it, i dont want no explanation, i dont understand why it happens but the fact that it works blows my mind and i wanna keep it that way, liked and subbed tho, great content!
@Lawry-nwyfu7 ай бұрын
Squiddy , this video has made me rethink my whole life , my wife came back , my son loves me again , my ex finally got over our breakup . Squirrel, there aren't words in the English language that can show my appreciation so I'ma just say - Thank you Pookiebear
@kapsaysin7 ай бұрын
This is something I’d likely never build, but is genuinely so cool that I can’t help but admire it.
@wChris_7 ай бұрын
the diagonal distance is sqrt(2), which is 41% bigger than beacons just next to each other. You can calculate the distance using Pythagoras' theorem.
@MxMxffin7 ай бұрын
yeah sure but this is not actually the angular difference. Both circles with diameter 34 and 35 can be built using 96 beacons. I'd go with 35 since i don't like double centers. you have 96 Blocks so your ideal Angular differences should be 360°/96 which is 3.75°. If you are in the middle of that circle and look south. The center of that block and the center of the block next to it have an angle of 3.37°, the next two enclose an angle of 3.34°, then 3.3° and then 3.23°, then when the first offset block comes the angle rises to 4.11°, 3.2°, 3.07°,4.44°,2.89°,4.57°,4.7°,4.76°, and then in reverse. The angles are all different.
@Superwaffle-ez9ct6 ай бұрын
loved this whole concept but WOW that redstone circuit at the end was so cool, i have to do that for a build some day
@LimolaGaming7 ай бұрын
You cant because it is a game with cubes.
@fizipcfx7 ай бұрын
i think he is aware that this game contains cubes
@ShadowDancer10007 ай бұрын
NUH UH
@costa-w3k4 ай бұрын
You can because it's a sandbox game
@dirtydan30293 ай бұрын
@@costa-w3k i found no sandboxes in this sandbox game 0/10
@The2024Not-Channel3 ай бұрын
@@dirtydan3029suspicious sand stores stuff like a box,10/10
@SilicatYT7 ай бұрын
Amazing video! Love how you explained how you came up with the shape
@Grinthex7 ай бұрын
You are right, I will probably never build this, but you made me want to and that sir is a success in my book.
@ВіталікБритан-х7ч7 ай бұрын
7:30 I can see binary counter here)
@Kaiasky7 ай бұрын
I really like the armor stand raycast. The resulting effect is really cool. I like the effect from places slightly off center, where they're not perfectly aligned but there's not an obvious grid pattern
@slbubuzamazal55187 ай бұрын
Such a neat problem. Awesome video
@epicrainbowАй бұрын
i actually needed this for my server with some friends, thanks!
@mirosVEVO7 ай бұрын
Splendid choice of music :)
@squibble1117 ай бұрын
hi bronkulator
@Shieldzany2 ай бұрын
Isn’t the background music from 0:17 A certain area of slime rancher?
@AureaTWАй бұрын
YESS it's from the glass desert i think it's called that in English?
@ShieldzanyАй бұрын
@@AureaTW thx
@ShieldzanyАй бұрын
@@AureaTWwait no it’s where you unlock the ancient ruins
@MooMania4Ай бұрын
Ancient gate is the bame
@ShieldzanyАй бұрын
@@MooMania4 thx
@AverageCentipedeHater3 ай бұрын
The most unexpected song you can hear in a Minecraft video is a Slime Rancher theme to be honest
@squibble1113 ай бұрын
whats also surprising is the disproportionately large amount of rain world fans who watch my videos. i don't know where they all come from
@bomblii7 ай бұрын
omgg u have a little lantern hat :3
@pedrom45727 ай бұрын
cooking tutorials for dishes ill never make are the only possible cooking tutorials for me
@Drawoon7 ай бұрын
nice to see I'm not the only one who figured out the right glass pattern for a good rainbow
@santi-agoАй бұрын
Dude u have made the PERFECT thumbnail 😧 i always keep clicking on this video no matter how many times i have seen it in my recommended. Good job
@vulpesinculta34787 ай бұрын
Holy moly you are an absolute genius, love ur videos, they're always not only interesting, but explained in enough depth to make even a layman like me understand the concept!! :D
@imoutofthisgame7 ай бұрын
"Why you can't make a Perfect Circle with Beacons in Minecraft" 2:49 THATS LITERALLY A PERFECT CIRCLE WITH BEACONS IN MINECRAFT
@clumsytav3 ай бұрын
As Kendrick once said "A perfect circle's never perfect only filled with lies" Very deep conceptual lyrics.
@thenameofxavier7 ай бұрын
A baking tutorial for a cake you'll never bake is a fire line
@genericalias21793 ай бұрын
this is so beautifully overengineered
@percycreeper27337 ай бұрын
ah, yes, the slime rancher music :D
@samstedman4096 ай бұрын
God damn I hope you’re an engineer irl bc this is really smart. The second I saw how you used the armor stand I was like this guy is a genius.
@Plaegu7 ай бұрын
Mom: Your OCD isn’t that bad Me: … I need the beacon beams mathematically perfectly apart.
@foxglove-woods2 ай бұрын
the ingenuity here is incredible, seeing the problem and deciding there must be a way to solve it instead of decrying it as a 'quirk of minecraft' is incredible
@Qeuy_7 ай бұрын
I think this video explains why you can't make the perfect circle in Minecraft :}
@adamlau9274Ай бұрын
I actually like the rainbow glass without the beacons too looks like some cool colourful crystals
@lone.faerie7 ай бұрын
You just made ray marching in Minecraft... for a beacon. You're channel never fails to blow my mind
@jasperdiscovers7 ай бұрын
That was awesome! Love how it all comes together in the end.
@mikivini735 ай бұрын
Congrats for the thumbnail, that was one of the most interesting videos i haven't search for Gj
@kieran4613 ай бұрын
I put off watching this video every time it came up on my recommended thinking "that's dumb yes you can" and never have I felt so stupid
@rajczak_wonsz6 ай бұрын
Best thing to watch at 2am while having a mental brakedown. I'll 100% use this in my survival world when I get better
@FreakinGrooves7 ай бұрын
i like this video, it's genuine and interesting and comes from passion, which you can't really say about most other minecraft videos these days ;)
@JadeSadiky7 ай бұрын
I think filling in all of the corners of the original circle would help a lot and would still look good from the outside
@joeg5797 ай бұрын
it definitely would not look good from the inside, those regions with less "beacon density" than the cardinal directions would now have more "beacon density" than the cardinal directions and you're left with the same issue
@_Chrono1747 ай бұрын
I think it would also be possible to solve it by increasing the radius of the circle, perhaps with twice the circumference, doubling each color, or leaving spaces between each beacon (if you don't have so much material), so since the blocks are further away, it would be less noticeable the irregularity between the beacons, the advantage of this is that even from the outside or not being in the center, it would be possible to see the shape.
@EnderMega7 ай бұрын
You said no one is going to make it, so just because of that Im going to make one.
@squibble1117 ай бұрын
if you want the armor stand doohickey itll probbaly be in the discord server in a bit
@whateverprecisely7 ай бұрын
Cake you won't bake is a perfect analogy lol. Very small difference but a noticable one. I thought this might be about effect area usefulness but colors are pretty cool too. Good video!
@NameForHire3 ай бұрын
This is how I'd imagine a 4th dimensional tutorial video to be like with the abstract circle
@Electric0eye7 ай бұрын
This is the most fascinating bit of information I will probably never need
@sepiasmith50657 ай бұрын
this is SO FREAKING COOL wow that solution with the armor stand is so fascinating
@samloredescarregado17554 ай бұрын
That video and the color grading one actually helped on the end barrens I were trying to convert each discovered island in a gimmick and the island that i woulf focus on beacon messed me up when i tried to make bigger circles with degrade Thanks, hope you get even more recognization
@MichaKolb2 ай бұрын
that's the amazing fusion of creativity an technicalities, that I love about this game. Thanks for sharing this with me!
@davidgustafson61643 ай бұрын
The thumbnail and title of this video are perfect. Stuff like this is really clickable. Also the video was great :)
@overestimatedforesight7 ай бұрын
"It's best to consider this a baking tutorial for a cake you'll never bake" is unexpectedly poetic
@Spec7rejay4 ай бұрын
Actual interaction: Me: I need to play Minecraft Brother: what’s wrong? Me: I need to play Minecraft
@pinkius7 ай бұрын
That's why Hexagons are the Bestagons. If Minecraft was made with Hexagons, then you could've made semi-perfect circle.
@Digitalsurfer2657 ай бұрын
I love the off and on sequence, it’s like a light show
@Skeletor96baАй бұрын
i am in love with the flightspeed changer and i've only seen it be used for a total of 2 seconds
@mother_foxxer3 ай бұрын
i haven't played minecraft since before they added beacons. why am i here. keep doing what you're doing i feel like i learned a lot that i will never use in my life.
@peterpumpkineater69282 ай бұрын
You haven’t played Minecraft since 12 years so?
@Burningurns7 ай бұрын
I don’t usually watch much minecraft content but I’m glad I watched this. You are very talented, I love your building style
@some_12144 ай бұрын
math time: i think this process can be done more efficiently when using complex argand functions and circles. starting with complex numbers: the function [a•cis(z)] where “a” is the distance from the centre and “z” is the angle relative to the positive x axis (with a range of -pi
@poliax70667 ай бұрын
That's actually really cool
@Jord_OP7 ай бұрын
That is just beautiful
@DanatronOne7 ай бұрын
This could've been solved mathematically instead of experimentally! What you're effectively doing is trying to find good rational approximations of various irrationals. What you want to do is subdivide a circle into 96 evenly spaced units (for the 96 beacon colours), meaning each turn (such as for your armour stand) is 3.75 degrees. You have two conflicting requirements here, that are probably best expressed via a triangle. - You want to draw a right angled triangle with an angle (theta) as close as possible to each of those 3.75 degree increments - The hypotenuse of each triangle (aka radius of the circle) must be roughly equal (that is to say, you don't a drastically difference between each beacon; you want to find integers that are in the same ballpark) Additionally, the width and height of this triangle must be integers (since it's in minecraft, they're snapped to an integer grid) A standard "minecraft circle" is one that only cares about a consistent radius (hypotenuse). You care much more about there being a consistent 3.75 degrees between each beam. This is a mathematical approach to the experimental solution you found using the armour stand and raycasting, which can be generalised to many use-cases. You also only need to do 1/8th of a full circle, as you can mirror that to get a quarter-circle, and rotate that around to get the full thing. This means that instead of 96 coordinate pairs, you only really need to find 12 (well, 13, fenceposting for the diagonal). Starting from 0 degrees, and increasing 3.75 degrees each time, until you reach 45 degrees. To convert a degree angle into a pair of coordinates (let's use 30 degrees for example) you would have to convert it to radians (0.523598776...) and then find the tangent of that (0.577350269...). This gives you a decimal value (that's not necessarily rational). What you want is a rational (fractional) approximation of this value. Minecraft blocks are locked to an integer coordinate grid, which means you can only move a whole number of blocks in each direction. Obviously 5773/10000 would be a decent approximation of 0.5773, which would correspond to placing a beacon at the coordinate (5773, 10000). However that would place the beacon over 10,000 blocks away, well outside render distance, which isn't the best for visibility... also, we can get better approximations. You want to keep the denominator of this ratio relatively low, while maintaining as much accuracy as possible. For this, you can use a Farey sequence, implementing a Continued Fraction algorithm (google those terms for more info). These algorithms tell us that fractions such as 4/7 and 11/19 are good approximations of our 0.5773... decimal. We can check these with a trig calculator (omnicalculator has a good one) - plug in those values for the height and width of a triangle, and see that it has an angle pretty close to our target of 30 degrees. If we draw this visually, we can see how accurate it really is; i.imgur.com/LX8fsZz.png You say that this information is useful to almost nobody, but it's the opposite! What you're seeking by asking this question is something incredibly useful, and was a question asked by Euclid, around 2300 years ago! If you've ever used 22/7 as an approximation for pi, this is the branch of mathematics you have to thank for it.
@coconuttv44546 ай бұрын
Why is this making feel so nostalgic, I think its his voice it fits the old calming Minecraft videos back in the day.
@katebirch12075 ай бұрын
Interesting video, definitely came here because of the technical looking thumbnail, I got curious. (So far my biggest finished build is like a 6×6×8 house, so kind of out of my scale) Lovely end build, btw!
@squibble1115 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@JayceMinecraft4 ай бұрын
I love how you overdid this but I literally can't see a difference between the two LOLLL
@whataboutthetrout59063 ай бұрын
I’ve watched this once already, but it came back into my recommended and its very interesting. A 10/10, trout fuckin with it
@tyrannosaurusrekt11277 ай бұрын
i'm certain there's some really useful real-world application for this math problem you just solved that nobody else bothered to look for. like, there's gotta be.
@Jack-ck3jh4 ай бұрын
I'm admiring the fact that it looks chaotic until you stand in the middle and it all looks perfect.
@AureaTWАй бұрын
0:00 slime rancher ost, good choice. amazing choice even