I heard of these way back in the early to mid 2000s and yet they still are not on the road. Mostly because government officials are heavily invested in oil and want to keep us dependent on focil fuels. A car like this would cause gas and diesel costs to plummet and set people free from their system of control. So it and any similar technologies that have come along over the years are discouraged and some of the inventors have been murdered and their reaserch and prototypes dissapeared.
@kayEnt3rtainm3nt Жыл бұрын
Government officials have been incentivizing the adoption of alternative energy vehicles for years now through tax credits. Have you not noticed all the electric cars on the road? Also, who has been murdered?
@paradiselost9946 Жыл бұрын
@@kayEnt3rtainm3nt yes, but they only seem to subsidise the systems that DONT work and require lots of smaller, taxable, middlemen... i made a solar system a few years ago, thermal storage. had every intention of entering the great solar car challenge. then i read the requirements. still applied. got knocked back. no batteries? no electronics other than lights? plan on running at night when its cold for maximum heat differential? sorry. not allowed. we only want to train our university students about electronic devices supplied by large multinational companies like samsung and siemens... who do you think sponsors all this? alternative systems are not allowed. plus you arent a uni student. youre nobody. go get a degree then we shall talk. you know, before electricity got big, that some cities had compressed air supplies? some had high pressure water mains too, for hydraulics and the like. the last 100 years of flicking switches, we seem to have forgotten how to do a lot of things. simple things like ALL engines run on air, its just how the heat is supplied... fuel? its a source of heat. the engine uses that heat to make air expand. it doesnt have to be burnt inside the engine. nor does it _all_ have to be mixed with fuel. theres a lot of heat to share with all that air... doesnt even require that fuel be burnt at all... did i mention thermal storage? what do all modern power plants tend to use? steam. turbines. heat. i can make heat with a wind turbine, and make that wind turbine deliver maximum power regardless of windspeed... no need for brakes, the generator IS the brake... and resistive heating is pretty well much 100% efficient. and i can use that heat to boil water at a controlled, reliable rate... very consistent, the energy required to boil water. and i can do both at the same time. input and output. whereas a battery is basically an electroplating process with losses when charging, and a chemical decomposition with losses whilst discharging. slowly the metal being plated destroys itself. you also wont get much better than lithium/sodium. look at the periodic table. they cant discharge and charge simultaneously. they cant charge above a certain rate. they cant discharge above a certain rate. current chemistry requires lots of external circuitry to maintain them or they explode/fail. the cost of stripping all those chemicals out of them back to raw materials to be used again far outcosts the return. nobody talks about the third party waste. those other (toxic) chemicals also require manufacturing, handling, and disposal. what do you do with arsenic? or hydrochloric acid? or hydroflouric acid for that matter? dioxins? whereas i can melt down any old engine block and make a new engine block... electric cars are fine at the moment. give it five, ten years when the piles of rubbish accumulate and the gloss wears off. time will tell. i have zero faith in batteries, in solid state electronics, in fancy modern so called "hi-tech" stupidity... every thing breaks, everything wears out. what can be repaired, what cant be? nothing... and everything.
@kayEnt3rtainm3nt Жыл бұрын
@@paradiselost9946 Breathe.
@TempoLOOKING Жыл бұрын
@@kayEnt3rtainm3ntthe inventor of the water powered car was posioned. The guy worked at NASA and showed off a water powered car just before the end of the Gass shortage.
@robertarthurs32810 ай бұрын
Fossil fuels are still the most feasible option
@kanchiraveisubramaniyan91872 жыл бұрын
Wow. Interesting. The decade of 2020 to 2030 is sure a Revolutions in Auto industry.
@MyUsernameIsAlsoBort3 жыл бұрын
I am very fascinated by green tech, and I love any alternative energy source that can be used in a car. However, there are a lot of limitations to the technology. I think compressed air should definitely be used in small vehicles like forklifts for example, replacing the propane with an air tank to reduce emissions inside a warehouse. Even some golf carts could be done with compressed air. Little vehicles like that seem an ideal use for the technology. For a larger car, seems like it would only work as a city car. And the lack of infrastructure makes refilling the car a problem. If the car had an onboard electric air compressor so that you could plug it in at home and charge overnight rather than having to buy an air compressor, that would work. The main benefit over having an electric car that you could also plug in at home is that batteries have an enormously detrimental effect on the environment, far greater than creating the carbon-fiber air tanks that such a vehicle would use. So while I do think that air cars would never have become widespread enough to justify the infrastructure, it is still great as a niche technology. Though saying that the cars will help with global warming because their exhaust temperature is cool is just plain silly. And not to get political, but this is why I hate government regulation. The fact that the government wants to make electric cars mandatory stymies innovation in technologies like this, something that the all-seeing government didn't even know existed. Let people innovate and invent and come up with ideas that will be better than an electric car.
@Scudmaster113 жыл бұрын
i axualy dispise electric cars... air cars would make more since because its cleaner and better ... electric cars just arnt a good idea ... fast chargeing thoes batteries murders them “so much that they explode or catch fire” air cars can act like gas cars... in a way
@nathanhale74442 жыл бұрын
Oh they knew it existed. I've been hearing about this since the early to mid 2000s but it would disrupt the profits of many influential people as well as that of many politicians. They do have an on board compressor but it takes like 6 hours to charge. If you have an external compressor it takes a few minutes.
@nathanhale74442 жыл бұрын
@@Scudmaster11 you're right on both counts.
@dalehinshaw37648 ай бұрын
This is interesting for sure & from my perspective ,modern ICE engines are still vastly superior to current EV alternatives. This Air car technology described here may be suitable for golf carts & small equipment as someone suggested, but it be extremely dangerous to get on an Arizona freeway with 80 mph limits in a pint sizes car that can only go 45 mph top speed. Reminds me of that Shanklin song that was on Rush Limbaugh 's show 15 years ago. "In a Yugo". It's on KZbin to this day.😅
@MattL-x6e Жыл бұрын
Ev cars has been the (start) of this cleaner world vision. Our cars will eventually run of high Pressure air compressors with receiver tanks for energy storage. compressed air will be the energy while using a small amount of battery power for electrics and start up. - - *While the wheels are moving its turning the compressors filling them tanks
@thedubwhisperer21579 ай бұрын
You are aware of compressed air's energy density, yes?
@jamesvandamme77868 ай бұрын
@@thedubwhisperer2157 1000 bar oughta do it. Build it out of Unobtanium.
@thedubwhisperer21578 ай бұрын
@@jamesvandamme7786Musk's new project? 🤣
@fraz0064 жыл бұрын
i want to buy only if they make the shape like normal cars
@LearnMechwithNVM3 жыл бұрын
AWESOME!👌😀
@-Bhanu-pt8ul3 жыл бұрын
Why do you mind the shape if the technology itself is interesting and modern?
@lfm41592 жыл бұрын
@@-Bhanu-pt8ul Do you rlly want to drive around in that?
@ahamanandhan2 жыл бұрын
Well it must feel different, why don't give a try 😄
@jamesvandamme77868 ай бұрын
They travel at low speed and are minimal designs so they're light. This technology doesn't put out enough power to run a full sized car for the range that battery powered EVs achieve today.
@yvanpimentel99502 жыл бұрын
air engines are more suitable for big trucks, because air tanks are lighter than battery especially big ones ,in geometry as they get bigger the unit of energy density go up,and combine with gren hidrogen or natural gas the range can be more than doble.another use for this engine is as of grid energy for solar or wind.
@elixexo40112 жыл бұрын
Still requires energy to compress the air, but would greatly reduce emissions produced by cars.
@vrushabhvora40864 жыл бұрын
Nice work👌
@LearnMechwithNVM4 жыл бұрын
Thank You!😊
@ibrahimfikridokur28132 жыл бұрын
I’m skeptical about this “because the exhaust is cooler than the weather, it’s use will cool down the earth” thing, because as stated in the video, air is used to store energy. And energy is a conservative quantity, meaning you’ll get what you give, not more, but also not less. And in our situation, your exhaust is cool because there is some heat emitted when you pump the air into tank, so you take from the atmosphere what you gave it before (heat). This is my intuition about the topic, anyone who thinks different is welcome. Also i agree that it’s a greener source than the ones we use now..
@nathanielhampton25592 жыл бұрын
I agree, although I’m hoping whoever wrote this just misunderstood what was being told to him/her. I’m guessing they meant the exhaust temperatures are much higher in an IC engine than in an air engine. But uh well.
@huwkelvinmorgan35752 жыл бұрын
solar powered recharging
@nathanhale74442 жыл бұрын
It won't really have much if any effect on temperature. The air is cooler because it is going from high pressure to low pressure. When it's compressed the opposite happens. Much of the energy stored in the air is forced out of it and dissipates through the lines or storage tank. Then there's the heat that is generated by friction in the compressor and air motor. It's not enough to change the overall temperature either up or down. Even if there were millions of cars out there. Now what might make things cooler a little bit is when internal combustion engines start dissapearing. A cars engine produces lots of heat both from under the hood and out the exhaust. Multiply that by hundreds of thousands in a large city and you might actually get a noticeable drop in temperature locally but probably not globally.
@huwkelvinmorgan35752 жыл бұрын
i still think that compressed air powered cars are the future and will be
@t-serieas22782 жыл бұрын
Please delete this video urjently
@darrishawks60333 жыл бұрын
You can make compressed air without any electricity or moving parts using a trompe. Look it up. I think it will work really well in any place with water.
@LearnMechwithNVM3 жыл бұрын
But Trompe doesn't provide the amount of pressure required to move a car, I think that's why they have not used the Trompe Mechanism.
@pebblepod303 жыл бұрын
That's not true - some kind of energy would be required to compress the air, either electrical, mechanical (steam expansion) or chemical.
@chandanaahirrao21054 жыл бұрын
Nice
@LearnMechwithNVM4 жыл бұрын
Thank You!😊
@johnmongiello36022 жыл бұрын
Why make a car when you can make a air powered generator to power your car, house, ac/heat pump. A compressor powered by a solar panel to an air tank the lowest tech and cheapest battery you'll ever find, to the generator.It would be the greenest solution on the planet
@architsasta7003 жыл бұрын
Awesome Research! What's the Air powered car's name that Tata Motors is working on?
@LearnMechwithNVM3 жыл бұрын
Thank You!🙌
@LearnMechwithNVM3 жыл бұрын
Air Pod
@sumansallawar16493 жыл бұрын
Very nice 👌👍
@LearnMechwithNVM3 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lot!
@keithc81082 жыл бұрын
Well, those high pressure tanks are very expensive to replace. I know on a CNG car, the tanks expire after 15 years and must be replaced. Cost about 4k to 7k to replace those tanks.
@alphaalpha31812 жыл бұрын
they will cost $1000 after 15 year but by that time your car will be rusted pics of metal
@anic1716 Жыл бұрын
People change the cars in around 15 years anyway, so it's not a big deal. ICE cars need to get revisions periodically, and electric cars' battery loses performance by time. So, a 15-year lifespan of the batteries shouldn't be a problem.
@arielhermoso4262 Жыл бұрын
Keithc8108 : You can safely used the steel tanks of industrial : oxygen, acetylene, hydrogen, argon, etc..
@throcmorton3 жыл бұрын
There must be style! Musk understood this for his electric cars. Others looked like a freezer or a coffin on wheels. They are rejected by many. Most of the air cars look like kiddie carts at Disneyland. Stupid. Some models look great but will they be available?
@Verdiz7002 жыл бұрын
Your Musk you are talking about was removed back in 2019. considering he supported the new Rotschild scam by making electric cars environmentally damaging, involving child labor and when an electric car catches fire, it gives a huge conflagration after which the vehicle has to be submerged in a water container for 2 days. New technology is at the door, when we will have free electricity again, which used to be there between 1800 and early 1900! Also anti-gravity and other possibilities that were held back will be discussed, because around 6000 hidden patents will be released when the Rotschild world club is cleared.
@reyhilario96514 ай бұрын
Please see the Victorian (Australia) air engine developed a few years ago.
@aniketgupta10922 жыл бұрын
How is that compression done to get 20 bar pressure & how you maintain continuity 🤔
@iceolate12122 жыл бұрын
Nice overview... However, there was a clear mistake in your explanation of radar. Radar does not detect heat, that would be thermal imaging. Your inclusion of such information about radar reduces credibility. Just a tip, please research all of your points thoroughly before constructing your presentation.
@jt24732 жыл бұрын
I used Doppler radar to monitor traffic for speeders. Once, I detected something moving 3mph, but saw no car. A minute or so later, a jogger ran past. I think he had a metal belt buckle.
@JERELSALSERO3 жыл бұрын
use more lighter material, use carbonfiber instead of polyesterfiber! and make the speed at least 110 km per hour! its for the highways.
@lc8695 Жыл бұрын
I have same idea.
@shaundurant7415 Жыл бұрын
Does radar require an object to be hot for detection?
@thedubwhisperer21579 ай бұрын
No.
@ralphpremici7632 Жыл бұрын
What about engineair in Melbourne Australia 🇦🇺
@nwngenisys89696 ай бұрын
Why would you need exhaust? (40-43 mph is pretty weak, just saying)
@trill49072 жыл бұрын
Read the comments a whole list of tech experts .. that don't know much....but I enjoyed the video very much ..... and gave reading the comments the thumbs down
@LearnMechwithNVM2 жыл бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it!
@robertoortizespinoza7952 жыл бұрын
If the problem with combustion cars is the emission of greenhouse gases, the solution should lie in how to capture CO2 and prevent it from entering the atmosphere. Electric cars leave a deep carbon footprint in their manufacture. Mining degrades the environment, makes it expensive to purchase and increases the weight of the vehicle along with recharging problems. And these shortcomings of the electric car are aggravated in compressed air cars due to their low energy density.
@tandymiller7752 жыл бұрын
Is nuclear a fossil fuel?
@vjekoslavpavicic65752 жыл бұрын
Lets tink if we yuzit air car combayn weth mazda skay acktiw X engen
@venkateshvajja36663 жыл бұрын
iam not understand working procedure...i am sorry to say this... i think u are teaching what ever journal has....i.e., it seems to be u r reading from the journal
@-Bhanu-pt8ul3 жыл бұрын
No one can teach better than this. Go through the video once again.
@venkateshvajja63083 жыл бұрын
@@-Bhanu-pt8ul i went through this video many times even though am nt understndng, am a nit warangal student
@venkateshvajja63083 жыл бұрын
Only Working process
@LearnMechwithNVM3 жыл бұрын
See, what we needed to cover was basically this question, "What is an Air Powered car?" And along with this we have tried to cover most of the aspect related to this technology! That may be the reason that you may have found it a bit confusing.
@venkateshvajja63083 жыл бұрын
@@LearnMechwithNVM kk tq sir... for responding
@harizsulaiman36652 жыл бұрын
Why can’t the car reuse the exhaust air to power the engine
@anic1716 Жыл бұрын
That would be perpetual motion, which is impossible. The laws of physics don't allow this.
@mabe86822 жыл бұрын
Not a single word about where the compressed air comes from. Air compressors have a very bad efficiency, two thirds of the energy is turned into heat, one third compressed air.
@olrob112 жыл бұрын
200 Km and 65 Km/h is to little. We need 300Km and 100Km/h !
@anic1716 Жыл бұрын
It is still a concept, if this is developed I'm sure it will reach that and more. Think of all the improvements on electric cars that have been done in the last few years.
@sirgrizzly21203 жыл бұрын
Wait a sec, how are we compressing the air? Do we need to use fossil fuels to do this? I wonder
@yanikivanov3 жыл бұрын
charging battery needs fossils too...but it uses complex batteries after 5 years those batteries go bad....air tank is like battery that can last 30 years or longer.also there will be wind turbines and instead of generator compressor will be used.so think outside the box....this is future
@sirgrizzly21203 жыл бұрын
@@yanikivanov Oh I see. Check out Fusion Energy too
@anic1716 Жыл бұрын
If it's compressed using renewable energy then no.
@jeffkey53352 жыл бұрын
Electric vehicles require 10x more precious metals then gas wonder why USA banned compressed air vehicles at that range when it takes a month worth of electricity to recharge and history channel documentary on compressed air vehicles 15 years ago 125 miles for 2 bucks at home price
@yakut987615 күн бұрын
They always promote electricity, because electricity enables them to control people and make profits as a result of its malfunctions and complications. I noticed something strange. If there is a useful alternative technology, things will be rumored about it, including that it is inefficient and unreliable, or that it is a “perpetual motion machine” that violates the laws of physics and is immediately suppressed, even if it is in its initial stages. However, if the technology is “electric.” They'll advertise it as, " Oh, wow, futuristic technology !"
@ralphpremici7632 Жыл бұрын
I think they have gone belly up.
@maliduwa Жыл бұрын
Fossil fuel! Don't even think about air or water powerd cars☹️ b'cos you will die on road or poisoned in someweare.
@thedubwhisperer2157 Жыл бұрын
The air powered car which is always going to be on sale 'next year' What a scam. Compressed air is and always will be a very poor and expensive means of storing energy.
@williamjames95152 жыл бұрын
The truth is, it is not practical. The efficiency is too low!
@yakut987615 күн бұрын
Regarding efficiency, the efficiency of photovoltaic panels is (10%-26%), and they cannot withstand environmental conditions and need continuous periodic cleaning. They are much less efficient than a compressor, but they are always promoted.
@mauriceupton14743 жыл бұрын
Yeah still waiting..calling scam.
@scottpeterson75002 жыл бұрын
Solar power to run air compressors to store the energy as compressed air, to be used in all sorts of ways including compressed air cars
@eniomart2 жыл бұрын
Ok, then... years ago I was imagining something like this but, instead of 1 single tank, maybe is possible to have up to 3 tanks, and always using the same charge. Then the air intake to the engine or system, is possible to accumulate the output or throughput of that same air from the 1st Tank to the 2nd, then to the 3rd and then back to the 1st... Making an infinite free of recharge machine....
@mihaipodut14152 жыл бұрын
I was thinking the same and try to find a way to do it, but no luck yet.
@sirnikkel67462 жыл бұрын
You may get the engine more efficient, but thermodynamics will screw you if you try to autorecharge it
@Zoopie9112 жыл бұрын
Perpetual mouvement….
@tempstep4058 Жыл бұрын
I was thinking, you connect an on board compressor to each tank. When one tank is being used, another empty one will trigger the compressor connected to it so the empty one is refilled. Relay switches and regulators can automate that. But the tank must fill and compressor must stop before it goes full circle and car starts using the refilled air. Not perpetual motion because the on board compressors must run from the car battery, which has an alternator always charging it. When a tank's pressure lowers, a switch opens a valve of a full tank and then quickly shuts that of the empty one, which in turn triggers a compressor to start filling the empty tank that was just shut-off. So it becomes a self refueling vehicle. Could that work? Question is, how long will those 12V compressors take to fill those tanks?
@anic1716 Жыл бұрын
@@tempstep4058 How would be the car battery charged? If it used the air engine then it wouldn't work as energy would be lost in the process and using 3 tanks without any kind of compressor would be more efficient. The only suitable option I can see are batteries charged with photovoltaic panels (without batteries, so we can save in weight) on the roof of the car. This way, it won't have an unlimited range, but it would definitely help on getting a few more kilometers.
@crabbee882 жыл бұрын
This is old tech they had these before gas cars. The reason we arent driving them is because you cant control people with electricity if they are driving on air. And you cant charge people massive sums of money for fuel if you are driving with air
@priyanshishah96414 жыл бұрын
Great video.! 🙌 keep going 💯
@LearnMechwithNVM4 жыл бұрын
Thank You!😊
@ralphpremici76323 жыл бұрын
Check out the engineair by Angelo Dipierto, Melbourne Australia.
@FlakeyPM2 жыл бұрын
I agree, 400% to 500% more efficient than any other air powered motor. Uses a 3mm air supply. Tata picked the wrong engine.
@plemasucur56403 жыл бұрын
the only realistic green solution that has no alternative for now
@LearnMechwithNVM3 жыл бұрын
Hope for the best!
@Ioulos862 жыл бұрын
@@LearnMechwithNVM the danger is the weight and frame of this car it could never be place on the same roads are diesel freight tractors hauling 45 thousand lbs and more
@Mr11ESSE1113 жыл бұрын
that cars will be fine and good because recharge time of compressed air will be very fast basically lower then those of gasoline cars and much much much better then those of electric vehicles
@atulsinghtandan92324 жыл бұрын
Best work 🔥🔥.... Keep making such videos your channel grow soon 💓
@LearnMechwithNVM4 жыл бұрын
Thank You!😊 Yes, we will!🙌
@wesm39152 жыл бұрын
Your speaking English so give us monies and measurements accordingly
@perezzekeezequiel75942 жыл бұрын
I came up with a solar pneumatic recumbent energy engine I would love to show you my drawing
@mitulgamit4483 жыл бұрын
I am from India
@pipimontana Жыл бұрын
please don’t make more of these videos based on “research”
@perezzekeezequiel75942 жыл бұрын
I have an design for a solar pneumatic recumbent energy engine but can't find investors to creat it I would love to build it but I'm poor it's very easy car conversion
@lolzinjo2 жыл бұрын
Good video, but next time please convert rupees in euros or dollar so we dont need to convert it :D
@christopherpauldean6052 Жыл бұрын
Hello i been following air motors since early 80,s AIRCAR NCR AIR ENGINE CA and have some ideas as i love any info on new developments in air drive boats aircraft and so on wonderful informative video thank you best of luck
@3DLasers5 ай бұрын
I believe it was a 1904 Old College Physics Book that was stolen that had a page that showed you how to weld a couple of glass tunes together that would just drip liquid nitrogen off night and day. Trying to build a thermal differential engine that will run indefinitely with different temperential gradients of Nitinol Wire... USA USA USA 🇺🇸 🌎
@sdfft8205 ай бұрын
You guys have short memories. Guy Negre, a Frenchman, had apparently invented the air powered auto engine in the 1990s, and built several air powered vehicles that could drive upto 55 mph. What happened afterwards?
@mngabeastgamer93143 жыл бұрын
I can't understand what second exhaust Piston do?
@LearnMechwithNVM3 жыл бұрын
It just moves up due to the pressure exerted by the combustion of gases.
@mngabeastgamer93143 жыл бұрын
@@LearnMechwithNVM And how does it restore air pressure energy when stop at one point
@-Bhanu-pt8ul3 жыл бұрын
@@mngabeastgamer9314 A DC excitation motor is used to start it and the cycle continues.
@THEBLINDNINJ4 ай бұрын
The pain of how expensive these are probably going to be is just absurd. Like if you want this to be genuine you gotta wait like a year or so and you can make it cheaper. That’s what i think. Anyways this video really helped me a-lot with my science fair. Thank you.
@carraracom Жыл бұрын
I would make a indirect method: using compressed air as "battery" for a eletric engine. Both technologies are very well developed and the air container is the only safety issue to take care (maybe a kevlar air tank should solve it). It would have just a very small battery to just start the car (which can be like the ones from cordless tools, to be charged at home)
@pipimontana Жыл бұрын
😂😂😂😂 Finally, we can cool the planet 😂😂😂😂 The car will cool the environment where it’s driving - the heat up happens before 👌🏼
@marctorrades17602 жыл бұрын
Yeah it's funny, none of the french car manufacturers made it ! Renault , Peugeot, even Citroën who made the 2Cv . They're asleep. They keep making polluting engine, but , now no more petrol or gaz . Do you think they would give a chance to engineer like that . NO. To simple . With the roads in France now , these cars would be great, 65 to 70 kmh , its fast enough even in a crash .
@konardkonrado7755 Жыл бұрын
can anybody tell me how i supoise to refuel air pod 2.0 within2 minutes on every station? they have kompressors for tires wich are 3 bars max lol. AIrpod have 300 bard work pressure .... Do i miss something here?
@paradiselost9946 Жыл бұрын
car engines ARE air-powered. engines run on a combination of air and heat. all the fuel does is supply heat. we also limit ourselves due to having to stay within limits of combustion. compressed air engines are fine... but you lose the heat of compression, meaning the air doesnt expand as much as you expect. it requires heat to be replaced. thats why compressed air tools get cold. this is NOT a good thing for an engine. they get ice build up and freezing of valves if taken to the extreme. heat the air and it can expand with more force. the hotter, the better. plenty of ways to heat air first. im currently working on my own thermal storage system. far more reliable and simple than dealing with batteries and inverters.
@rkelektroniks2 жыл бұрын
i am also having simular idea
@random.9238 Жыл бұрын
im very sure they can be made faster and take air from top and bottom and the sides as well maybe tesla's water system desgin could help
@thedubwhisperer21578 ай бұрын
BS of the very highest order. How many air powered cars are in production and on sale right now?
@george_3252 Жыл бұрын
my only complaint with some eco cars is that they look so ugly, feel more car companies should remain faithful to some older designs to keep the style
@jorgealejandrohoyospaez15222 жыл бұрын
Lastima que no esté en español porque no se entiende nada y uno pierde el interes de algo tan importante
@atvheads10 ай бұрын
Been there, done that. It is useless as a power source for a car. And filling these tanks in 5 minutes is a lie.
@VijayPandat-zu5lo7 ай бұрын
Here’s we can use ev tech
@prototype9000 Жыл бұрын
piston engines are very inefficient for air engines a rotary vane or turbine is much more efficent
@yakut987615 күн бұрын
Each has its use. The turbine produces low torque and high speed, while the reciprocating engine produces high torque with low speed. It depends on the application.
@prototype900015 күн бұрын
@@yakut9876 rotary vane is a torque monster
@patrickfinnegan52022 жыл бұрын
Very good job gentlemen very much appreciate the information very interested in seeing if we can get one of these cars for our families could you please send me a link on how to purchase one?
@patrickfinnegan52022 жыл бұрын
I am very curious if you could build a generator that runs off compressed air. I am building a home that is off grid. This home will be powered by solar panels with a battery array to give it 24 hour power. But to have more electrical current you could have a back up generator that runs on air just like the one that runs your car that you have in this video and you could simply have the air compressor running off electricity also be powered by the solar panels to replenish the air in the poly carbon fiber tanks. My question is do you think that there are any current application Like a generator that is being used as of now that could possibly be purchased? Thank you!
@peterstark27163 жыл бұрын
I was thinking i will made it 😫
@Zoopie9112 жыл бұрын
Will fossil sources of energy be used to compress the air?! In that case isn’t just moving the problem elsewhere?
@anic1716 Жыл бұрын
If it's compressed using renewable energy then no.
@happyhappy40103 жыл бұрын
Mangat pesten use Air engin
@thedubwhisperer21579 ай бұрын
2:40 😆😅😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@rajendrabhatt54792 жыл бұрын
a request to please expedite, production on vast basis to lessen air pollution globally. This is the extreme need, say in urgency.
@jamesvandamme77868 ай бұрын
Where do you get the compressed air from?
@parthadas30063 жыл бұрын
I want to learn farther in more detail and am a person without any technical bavkground
@jamesvandamme77868 ай бұрын
Most of these 'inventors' are. That's why they never get anywhere.
@robertarthurs32810 ай бұрын
No
@ishwarpote68723 жыл бұрын
Hope for the good will .
@knezevicdragan36579 ай бұрын
0:23 cijena automobila?
@dreamtoremember46363 жыл бұрын
Waiting
@mokd17623 жыл бұрын
Hai, can any one tell what type of air we are filling in this car
@LearnMechwithNVM3 жыл бұрын
It uses normal air which we breathe, but in highly compressed form.
@datguyphil391 Жыл бұрын
im curious to know what powers the first piston
@thedubwhisperer21579 ай бұрын
Magic Pixies.
@racataiangheorghe128 Жыл бұрын
So basically you have in a very small car a 300l air tank at 300bars. I have seen videos of people ripped apart by air compressors bursting due to tank failures at only 10 bars, I can not imagine what a 300bars boom would do to a man in small car... And eventually such an accident would happen due to many reasons, it's not a matter of if but of when.
@ludoandro8137 Жыл бұрын
Peugeot development of hybrid car (combustion engine + air compressed engine) has been stopped few years ago. They claim selling volume are not high enough and therefore it would not generate enough profit. I just wonder now... Peogeot is part is stellantis and energy price rise... Would they restart development?
@MrAcquadimare Жыл бұрын
Theorically there's another easy solution to use compressed air without ice formation: compressed air pushes water quitly..., and water(liquid) does all the work.
@Dimythios3 жыл бұрын
Current technology does not work for air compressed vehicles. Otherwise TaTa Motors would have made billions with these clean energy cars. This is still in the experimental stages.
@naveen..8733 жыл бұрын
Exhaust temp is less due to gas expansion, this is basic😒
@LearnMechwithNVM3 жыл бұрын
But as the Engine load increases the exhaust temperature also increases.
@naveen..8733 жыл бұрын
@@LearnMechwithNVM but bro, in dealing with air powered car the exhaust temp will always lesser due to expansion,it is not good for environment because all the heat is generated during gas compression and tank filling
@shaneord75272 жыл бұрын
Helps reduce air temperature eh? Okay, so what about all the heat generated during compression?
@hearsejr2 жыл бұрын
If they make it look sporty and good looking, not like a sweet pea with tiny wheels, i bet it would be a huge hit.
@scaloi2 жыл бұрын
Instant compressed air can be obtained using explosives, like the air bags that we already have in cars.
@anic1716 Жыл бұрын
@sourand jaded using some Fresnel lens to heat up the air is also possible. The temperature isn't that high, but at least it heats it up a bit.
@Wallace197112 жыл бұрын
Where can I purchase one of these inside the United States?
@markquavertune2003 Жыл бұрын
Would it be posible to incorporate centrefugal force and compressed air into an engine design ? A compressed air flywheel engine ? Research and development into tank expansion and contraction dynamic . Heavy cars that go way more than the speed limit is the problem we could avoid anyway .A powerfull porsche stuck in traffic is no better than a small Toyota .
@jamesvandamme77868 ай бұрын
Buy an air car and you'll never have to worry about speed limits.
@johnmongiello36022 жыл бұрын
Why make a car when you can make a air powered generator to power your car, house, ac/heat pump. A compressor powered by a solar panel to an air tank the lowest tech and cheapest battery you'll ever find, to the generator.It would be the greenest solution on the planet
@mrmexicano642 жыл бұрын
I think what they're trying to remove in the equation is the battery since the manufacturing of batteries leave a negative impact to the environment. Also remember that every time you transfer energy from one medium to another you're losing efficiency.
@perezzekeezequiel75942 жыл бұрын
My idea 💡 for my S.P.R.E.E. solar pneumatic recumbent energy engine just wish I could afford to build it been waiting to build it since 2007 just underprivileged and underfunded I can't build it without help I just have the patent and the paper anyone interested or have ideas on what I should do let me know thank you
@arielhermoso4262 Жыл бұрын
rez Zeke Ezequiel : I am interested in your SPREE air powered , pls PM me..
@perezzekeezequiel7594 Жыл бұрын
@@arielhermoso4262 if you want I can email you a picture of the workings of it it’s a simple explanation of how it works together but if I could double the magnet amount in an alternator I can take out one air turbine generator it’s really possible
@joy211191 Жыл бұрын
Forced induction can scoop up air and compress it to refuel?
@thedubwhisperer2157 Жыл бұрын
No.
@leogra3621 Жыл бұрын
Fascinating! Its 2023, anyone knows where we are with that?
@thedubwhisperer21579 ай бұрын
Nowhere - it's all a scam.
@jamesvandamme77868 ай бұрын
The improvements in battery technology have surpassed it. Just like hydrogen, the inefficiencies make it too costly vs. just charging your batteries.
@johnnymcgeez56472 жыл бұрын
Almost 300 bars... What if god forbid, you crash and it explodes? 90 cubic meters of air under almost 300 bars is basically a bomb...
@DenverDave5280 Жыл бұрын
Duly noted. Millions of production vehicles on the road with fuel tanks containing both vapor and liquid petrol (gas) present a similar concern. Yet, design considerations have been made and we've learned from past design flaws (see Ford Pinto).
@tempstep4058 Жыл бұрын
That's why you use carbon fiber material for a tank. Usually cracks open and not explode. Conventional metal explodes.
@anic1716 Жыл бұрын
If the tanks are well protected with extremely resistant materials, it isn't more dangerous than a 60 liter petrol tank.
@arielhermoso4262 Жыл бұрын
Johnny Mc Geez : The American B-52 bombers plane carried more than 20,000 kilos of bomb- plus the thousands of liters of jet engine fuel... Yet the 2. plane pilots didnt think that it will explode to their face!..
@dingdongsyo3 жыл бұрын
That cooling effect is non-existent because you have to first compress the air which creates more heat than the net cooling effect. Disliked for that reason
@LearnMechwithNVM3 жыл бұрын
So, glad that you have noticed it and also made us aware about it. What happens is when you are trying to make something good you always focus on how to make it look better and make it more simple to understand, and while doing so such small mistakes happens. But We will surely try to avoid such mistake in future! Keep Supporting!😊 and Don't forget to subscribe!🙌
@ericpham82053 жыл бұрын
Yes but you cars left any air for you to breath after that?