I applaud the effort and the purpose, but I would not call this an introduction *as it is currently structured*. In my mind, an introduction would clearly state the problem, describe why the problem exists, describe what's desired, and work it out from there. I do enjoy the video, but I believe that's because I already have some small understanding of the FT.
@gallamine9 жыл бұрын
Code and notebooks for (an earlier version of) this talk are here: github.com/gallamine/fft_oscon
@kpmaynard9 жыл бұрын
+gallamine Just FYI Cooley and Tukey published in 1975.
@ElectronoobGeekingOut8 жыл бұрын
+gallamine awesome talk
@innovationmail87657 жыл бұрын
Could you tell why in 6:12 the 3rd circle has a point instead of a line
@cybermascot9 жыл бұрын
awesome talk :)
@dgtlmoon8 жыл бұрын
great talk! thanks!
@mkminerals123438 жыл бұрын
fantastic
@Nicknamelikeyours8 жыл бұрын
Errors in the slides (and different definitions for the same thing), he lefts many things unclear, but let's people fall into the trap that this what it's all about (as if it is that easy). I think this talk is really bad. Sorry but you can't left the math out and let it seem as if it's just as understandable as without.
@dipeshwalte98498 жыл бұрын
I really wished I had seen this in my Graduate years, the subject would have been way more interesting...
@MIKOOO652 жыл бұрын
If someone came here to learn how FFT works, it is better to skip this video. I came here to learn how FFT are better then "normal" I an got nothing.