Windows Chicago (95) Build 3.10.07200022 Installation and Demo!

[@Leonardo5681]

Hey buddy, I came across this video in my recommendations, good job, subscribed :)

[@naturexmusic2567]

The Windows XP Theme at last was something special......... Let me tell you people what my dad did. He bought a system and wanted to install the XP on his own. The first time, I was in a hurry and went to play, but he reinstalled it again. That was the time I just sat and enjoyed Theme myself fully. Thank you XP for everything.

[@osstuff123]

I didn't expect a version like this. At this speed we may find the BYTE magazine Windows 1.0

[@pankoza]

OR EVEN A BETA OF WINDOWS 2.0, THESE ARE ALL ELUSIVE SO FAR!!!

[@osstuff123]

@@pankoza Yeah

[@atsizbalik]

we almost had that version, but the floppy disk is corrupted enough to not work

[@osstuff123]

@@atsizbalik I know, i mean working copy

[@PutHandleHere11]

Or maybe dr1

[@alexisw4362]

Object Packager isn’t new in this build- it’s present in Windows 3.1 (not sure exactly how far back it goes), and is carried through to 95 (and later; IIRC it still exists in Windows 11, although it looks different now). As to what it does- it lets you package arbitrary files into documents in other applications using OLE (Object Linking and Embedding), particularly useful if you want to package something that’s not an embeddable OLE object itself. So, if you wanted to, for example, include a .wav file that you recorded using Sound Recorder in a document that you’ve written in Write, you can use Object Packager to do that- go to “Edit” > “Insert Object…”, pick “Package”, then choose the file that you want to package; then the package will show up as an icon in your Write document and you can share that Write document and any of its embedded packages will come along with it.

[@dank-su]

Only 14 subs for this level of quality is criminal

[@naturexmusic2567]

He is making great , really having low subs is a bad thing

[@kathrynradonich3982]

43 now

[@naturexmusic2567]

@@kathrynradonich3982 60 now

[@MadameSomnambule]

Dang, so this build was compiled at midnight, quite late at night.

[@atulrai701]

Refurbhised windows 3.1??

[@WindowsSurfaceOffical]

I took a look at this build and while testing most of the applications won't work or give network errors as expected form a beta build but what is strange and kind of odd the beta wiki page shows some additional apps that weren't present in the control panel folder and those are Windows Memory Viewer General Info, Windows Heaps Viewer, Window Matrics, Screensavers, and Wallpapers weren't present when I installed it in 86Box and few applications did work after a lot of researching

[@anidnmeno]

11:19 oh, my sweet summer child

[@naturexmusic2567]

Man, please make something nostalgic about XP. I hope you will make it for your 50 subs celebration, won't you?

[@Adxrezz]

Ahhh before 911 era

[@levelairplane768playzroblo8]

Congratulations for leaking this.

[@kokodin5895]

doesn't seem much improved over windows 3.11 i know and love from childhood i am surprised it is even called chicago at all because it looks like microsoft didn't even know how a next version of windows should look like yes and just poking it in the dark also if i remember corectly you don't need to pick exit from menus to close programs, just doubleclick on the minus button

[@MSBenwastaken]

This version was released *before* Windows 3.11. That's why it looks so much like 3.11.