Windows vs Linux Kernel performance on unreachable ports

Рет қаралды 10,002

Hussein Nasser

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 32

@hnasr 3 ай бұрын

Fundamentals of Operating Systems Course oscourse.win

@spicynoodle7419 2 ай бұрын

I really enjoy these long, deep dives. You always cover interesting topics

@bipulmishra1543 3 ай бұрын

Recently started watching your videos. Feels nice to know things in depth❤

@nathansherrard4111 2 ай бұрын

The term "Happy Eyeballs" is basically a euphemism for "good user experience". The RFC was trying to balance network load and efficiency versus fast enough timeouts that users wouldn't readily notice that they were timing out and failing over to another address family. Thus the delay was short enough (200-300ms) that their eyeballs remained "happy" as it didn't negatively impact their experience.

@eminence_grise 2 ай бұрын

I have just finished listening to the podcast about this topic and decided to subscribe to your KZbin channel. Thank you for sharing interesting things!

@esra_erimez 2 ай бұрын

Great explanation of Window's TCP/IP. Douglas Comer would be proud. P.S.: you have some very strange bots in your comments. Edit: How many people know who Douglas Comer is?

@siya.abc123 2 ай бұрын

One day the dev tool them all series will make a comeback

@benlu 2 ай бұрын

I like how he didn’t actually try setting the registry option on his machine

@anandmoon5701 2 ай бұрын

Its seems that server would not be listning on ipv6 port for this behavior 😮

@uguremirmustafaoglu40 2 ай бұрын

Deamons are in trouble, yo 😂

@devyetii 2 ай бұрын

Thanks for the great video, as USUAL

@hnasr 2 ай бұрын

Oh that is a good question, I really don't know the answer. But If I would to guess the underlying kernel is a Windows, and linux comes on top, so we should see the retries .

@theweirdamir 2 ай бұрын

Demonstrably is actually a word😄

@adityapoddar3798 2 ай бұрын

What is there written in Japanese

@esra_erimez 2 ай бұрын

16:02 In 2024 you might need to have IPv6 disabled on Windows due to a zero day. Edit: please see CVE-2024-38063

@nezu_cc 2 ай бұрын

Or just update Windows? That disable was only good as a temporary measure for systems that can't be updated immediately.

@monad_tcp 2 ай бұрын

I don't think people should use IPv6 without NPTv6 , having internal machines publicly addressable outside was a mistake. with NPTv6 the firewall can block access to protected resources, for ex, you might only allow SIP or voip to pass to internal machines, not everything. And yes I know about rfc4941, it just put too much burden on all devices in the network instead of a device made for it, a router/firewall.