Wira Merdeka

[@muhammadhafizuddin2691]

Anggota TDP dah blh layak utk menerima pingat sekurangnya KPK

[@62000zas]

udah tahu kawasan konflik, sepatutnya usah lalu kawasan bergolak memang sentiasa ada pelancar missiles...

[@Prv_Objectivist]

The MH17 court found the defendants guilty on the basis of circumstantial evidence only. Even if we accept as a fact that the militia had a Buk and a rocket was launched from the field near Pervomaykiy, this does not mean that it was she who hit the Boeing. There were hostilities, BOTH warring parties fired, and the missile that hit the Boeing could also be launched from another location, by the other side of the conflict. This version has not been considered. The court stated that "... if it is convincingly proven that it was a missile from a field near Pervomaisky that shot down MH17, then this already rules out any other scenario." But the question is that THIS is proved only by circumstantial evidence, it is not at all convincing!

[@Prv_Objectivist]

Ukraine has not closed the airspace over the combat zone to receive money for overflights. She didn't give a damn about the danger to passenger planes. The rebels thought they had shot down a Ukrainian military plane. They believed that they had fired at a Ukrainian military aircraft. The connection between their shot and the fall of the Boeing is only indirect - it is believed that if they fired, then their rocket hit the plane. But there is no exact time of their shot. It is impossible to prove whether their missile shot down the Boeing - there was cloud cover and witnesses did not see that it was the rebel missile that hit the plane. There was a war going on - both the rebels and their opponent were shooting. Ukraine also had a Buk, and Ukraine had already shot down passenger planes by mistake (2001). The investigation was based on data provided by Ukraine. And she had every opportunity to conceal something, and to stick out something.